According to analysts, the Palestinians’ long-hoped-for results might not be the results that Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has promised to see from the US president’s proposal for a ceasefire, according to Al Jazeera.
The 20-point Trump plan contains essentially nothing else beneficial for Palestinian people, according to analysts, while the people on the ground would be greatly relieved if Israel’s vicious bombardment stopped, killing at least 66, 055 people, and injuring 168, 346 people since October 2023.
Recommended Stories
list of 3 itemsend of list
According to Palestinian lawyer and analyst Diana Buttu, who served as a legal advisor to the Palestinian negotiating team from 2000 to 2005, “Ending the genocide is tied to this very colonial approach where the US, the party that carried out the genocide, and the US, who has funded it, decide the fate of the people against whom they are committing genocide.”
There are no guarantees made to the Palestinians, she added, if you read the entire agreement in its entirety.
The Israelis receive all guarantees, according to the statement.
Gaza is the focus, but there is no clarity.
In exchange for hundreds of living Palestinians taken by Israel, as well as the remains of hundreds of dead, the plan would end fighting in Gaza, and Israeli prisoners held there would be freed.
The “Board of Peace,” an international transitional administration led by Trump and whose members include former UK Prime Minister Tony Blair, is then required to relinquish control of the Gaza Strip.
Amnesty for Hamas members who promise “peaceful coexistence” and “disarmament” will be granted. “All people who wish to leave Gaza will have safe passage to receiving nations,” said the statement.
According to reports, Israeli troops would resume aid deliveries after a set number of conditions were met, though it’s unclear who would impose their withdrawal, and an economic revitalization strategy would be developed by Middle Eastern experts who had developed “thriving modern miracle cities” (Middle Eastern).
Hamas has stated that the plan is being considered at the moment.
Trump warned that if Israel rejected his offer, it would have the right to take whatever course of action it saw fit in Gaza with the full support of the US. Israel’s actions in Gaza are already being compared to a genocide, according to human rights organizations and academics.
However, Muhannad Seloom, an assistant professor at the Doha Institute for Graduate Studies, stated for Al Jazeera that this leaves many questions unanswered.
For instance, the Palestinian Authority (PA) is mentioned in the plan, but it won’t have any immediate impact until a reform plan with various recommendations is finished. Trump both mentioned his 2020 peace plan and the Saudi-French proposal, but it’s unclear what he meant by specific reforms. In the past, the PA has been advised to overhaul its governance, address endemic corruption, alter the educational curricula, and overhaul the social welfare system to support Palestinian prisoners’ families.
According to the Times of Israel, Secretary of State Marco Rubio did not ignore the changes and criticize the PA for an outdated policy despite the fact that the PA has changed the prisoners’ families’ payment schedule.
Without any clear objectives, the PA will have to persuade Israel and the US that its reform efforts have been completed before it can rule Gaza. This could continue unabated.
The plan does not specify whether the notorious Israeli and US-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF), which has resulted in more than 1, 000 Palestinians being killed waiting for aid, will be disbanded. Instead, it states that aid will be provided by the United Nations and the International Red Crescent.
According to Seloom, “It seems like a rushed agreement that will be refined as they go along.”
What state is Palestine located in?
The state of Palestine was recognized on September 21 by Canada, Australia, and the United Kingdom. Soon after, more European nations, including France and Portugal, followed suit.
Despite analysts claiming that the act of recognition was primarily a face-saving exercise, global leaders praised the “two-state solution.”
The UN General Assembly voted in favor of a resolution that would reinstate a two-state solution on September 12. The international community has frequently discussed a two-state solution for Israel and Palestine.
However, some analysts contend that the phrase “two-state solution” is unrelated to the reality on the ground and that this proposal raises a more pressing issue: Even if Israel’s two-year-long genocidal campaign is halted, in what kind of state would Palestine be in reality?
The West Bank and the Gaza Strip are frequently mentioned when discussing a Palestinian state, with East Jerusalem as the Palestinian capital.
But Israeli policy is splintering and isolating those areas. Additionally, with international cooperation, illegal Israeli settlements exploded in the occupied West Bank, further reducing any potential future Palestinian state.
Before October 2023, this was the case, but since then, things have gotten worse: movement restrictions, land grabs, settlement expansions, settler- and military violence, and home destructions.
Before Israel’s war on Gaza, there was no longer a single stretch of Palestinian land in the Gaza Strip, but Palestinians could not travel there because of Israeli restrictions on their travel.
Analysts worry that this strategy will further sever Gaza from East Jerusalem and the West Bank. There is only one brief mention of a potential “credible path to Palestinian self-determination and statehood,” which depends on how the ambiguous PA reform program is “faithfully carried out.”
What resources are left over to create a Palestinian state in light of recent recognitions, analysts questioned.
Buttu remarked, “This is the one-million-dollar question.” The problem is that “everyone recognizes the state of Palestine as it is being erased,” according to the statement.
According to the plan, Trump’s plan also imposes a burden on the Palestinians from outsiders, including having no recourse if Israel does not withdraw from Gaza.
Netanyahu has, for his part, pledged to halt any attempts to create a Palestinian state on numerous occasions. Netanyahu signed a settlement agreement to proceed with the occupation of the West Bank a day before a UNGA vote that approved a resolution supporting the two-state solution and declared, “There will not be a Palestinian state.”
Netanyahu’s goodwill and US assurances that Israel will adhere to the agreement are two things that have long been in short supply, according to analysts.
Analysts are unsure whether Netanyahu’s past efforts to undermine the peace process and enshrine the occupation will actually be put into practice.
According to Seloom,  , the agreement is “workable on paper,” but “from experience, there are so many details that are ambiguous.”
Palestinians negotiating the end of their own genocide
Palestinians have previously dealt with Israel.
What ought to have been the foundations for a future Palestinian state in the early to mid-’90s were laid by the Oslo Accords, a pair of interim agreements between Israel and the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO).
Since the second accord was signed in 1995, though, little has changed in that regard. Instead, according to experts, Israel has repeatedly thwarted the establishment of a state in Palestine. The current situation appears to be worse than it has ever been, with years of Israeli-led exploitation of Palestinian land and two years of the Gaza genocidal campaign.
According to Buttu, who was the PLO’s legal advisor at Oslo, “this is worse than Oslo.” There was a Palestinian voice at least in Oslo.
We’re back to the days when other people were speaking on our behalf because of this.
No Palestinian leaders were present when Trump met with Arab and Islamic leaders on September 23 to discuss his plan.
The Palestinians themselves bear the brunt of the blame for ending Israel’s occupation of Gaza, according to the US. Israel’s genocidal war will continue and possibly even grow if Hamas rejects a deal that offers few guarantees to the Palestinian people.
Source: Aljazeera
Leave a Reply