The EPA has announced that it intends to revoke a landmark scientific finding on climate change that served as the foundation for important environmental and pollution laws.
The EPA, which will take over the 2009 “endangerment finding,” which links car emissions to climate change and negative health effects, was revealed in an interview on Tuesday.
Zeldin continued, “Those who want to reduce carbon emissions only highlight the negative effects.”
“They’ll say carbon dioxide is a pollutant and that’s the end of it,” they say in response to the endangering finding. In a right-wing podcast called Ruthless, Zeldin stated that they never acknowledge any kind of benefit or need for carbon dioxide.
It’s crucial to bear in mind how significant it is for the planet, even if they don’t.
The “endangerment finding” has played a significant role in the development of regulations for greenhouse gas emissions, including those relating to automobile emissions standards.
Conservative lawmakers and fossil fuel companies, who have sought its repeal, have become increasingly critical of the finding, which was released under Democratic President Barack Obama.
The “endangerment finding” has withstanded a number of court challenges, though.
In order to boost the economy, the Trump administration would continue to push back against environmental protections and slash regulations.
The EPA plans to revoke all regulations for light-, medium-, and heavy-duty vehicles, according to a report from Reuters last week.
Zeldin also cited the benefit of the “endangerment finding” in Tuesday’s interview.
According to Zeldin, “there are people who are willing to bankrupt the country in the name of climate change.”
They “made this endangered finding,” and they now have the authority to impose all these rules on vehicles, planes, and stationary sources, basically regulating out of existence, in many cases, many different sectors of our economy.
Zeldin also referred to the finding’s revocation as the “largest deregulatory action” in US history and a potential fatal blow to efforts to combat climate change.
According to Zeldin, “This has been described as basically kicking a dagger into the climate change religion.”
A decrease in vehicle emissions, according to a study from Harvard University’s TH Chan School of Public Health, helped lower the number of fatalities attributed to air pollution from 27,700 in 2008 to 19,800 in 2017.
The researchers attribute that decline to a combination of technological advancements and federal regulations.
They also pointed out that if emissions had remained at their 2008 levels, there would not have been any more deaths than 48 and 200 by 2017.
Supporters believe that regulations regulating air pollution are essential to reducing harmful health effects and limiting climate change.
Trump, however, has called climate change a “hoax” and defied scientific consensus.
Instead, he has pushed for the US to increase its use of fossil fuels, which are viewed as the main cause of climate change.
His energy secretary, Chris Wright, claimed that climate change is a “byproduct of progress” rather than an existential crisis in a column for The Economist magazine earlier this month.
For this legacy of human advancement, Wright wrote, “I’m willing to accept the modest negative trade-off.”
Source: Aljazeera
Leave a Reply