Why is Brooklyn attempting to break free from Brand Beckham’s influence? Experts examine the complicated world of child monetization and where it might lead.
Brooklyn Beckham was world-famous before he could even walk, and now his staggering stardom has come back to haunt him.
From early photoshoots to public appearances alongside his parents, Brooklyn grew up in one of the most famous family names. David and Victoria Beckham were not only parents, but a commercial powerhouse, with their children frequently appearing in campaigns, at events and even in documentaries that reinforced the ‘Brand Beckham’ image.
For many celebrity families, that line between private upbringing and public persona is blurred – and experts warn the impact can linger well into adulthood. For Brooklyn, it seems that growing up in his parent’s glitzy world has left a gaping whole in his own sense of identity – and now he’s made it his mission to “take control back”. In turn, the aspiring chef has shattered the picture-perfect family image his parents have spent years cultivating.
In a six-page social media statement, he vehemently stated that “my family values public promotion and endorsements above all else.” “Brand Beckham comes first,” says Beckham. Family “love” is determined by how much you share on social media or how quickly you post, even if it comes at the expense of our professional obligations.
READ MORE: Real reason Brooklyn Beckham exploded at Victoria as bitter ‘trademark row’ exposed
The most amazing part of Brooklyn’s letter is that money is the center of the letter, aside from the brutal allegation that Victoria “hijacked” his first wedding dance with “very inappropriate” behavior. He wrote, “My parents repeatedly pressured and attempted to bribe me into reneging on the rights to my name, which would have affected my wife and our future children,” before our big day. They resisted requiring me to sign before the day of my wedding, fearing that the terms of the agreement would be in effect. The payday was affected by my holdout, and they have never treated me similarly.
Although it’s not known what Brooklyn means by payday, the Beckhams, whose net worth is estimated to be around £500 million, are diligent about upholding their family’s solid legacy. And recent information regarding the “Brand Beckham” trademarks may help to understand what actually drives the conflict.
The name Beckham was registered with the intellectual property authorities in the UK and Europe in April 2017, according to a report from BBC News that emerged in April 2017. This allowed for the release of branded products while keeping the name Beckham safe from other celebrities or businesses. She and David had previously registered their names, respectively, in 2002 and 2000.
And now it’s emerged that Victoria is the sole owner of the trademark on Brooklyn Beckham’s name – said to expire this year. Documents seen by the Daily Mail reportedly show that in December 2016, the fashion mogul took out the trademark in her son’s name, with the deadline for expiration said to be December of this year. When it ends, Brooklyn will be free to renew using his own lawyers, the publication claims.
While a trademark may be extremely lucrative, it seems much more lucrative for Brooklyn, whose entire identity is tied to Brand Beckham. His early exposure was frequently depicted as wholesome and aspirational: a close-knit, loving family navigating fame together. However, as he advanced older, he began to elude scrutiny for his own public image, shifting between fields of photography, cooking, and fashion. Commentators frequently questioned his worth, independence, and whether or not he had earned or inherited any of his successes at each pivot.
He frequently dressed as a child to reflect the occasion at family weddings and official events, which reinforces the idea that even the most memorable occasions were carefully chosen for public consumption. His presence at football games also became a part of the spectacle. Fans praised these instances, but Brooklyn also learned from them that he was a part of the brand as a whole. And that seems to have severn the family bond, too.
But why has Brooklyn just begun its nuclear attack? And did Victoria and David choose to trademark the names of their children in order to protect their empire? According to Mayah Riaz, a PR to the stars, “the conversation around monetizing Brooklyn from a young age is complicated.” “Children raised in well-known families frequently overlook the origins of their brands. That has a profound impact on later in life, including identity and autonomy.
According to the expert, that pressure can be particularly destabilizing for someone who has never experienced life without the spotlight. A young person’s ability to develop a sense of self that is distinct from public expectations is harder, according to Mayah. Participation does not, however, automatically imply exploitation, especially when seen as a family rather than a form of business. The significance of the story’s nuance is frequently forgotten.
While Dr. Jane Halsall, a chartered counseling psychologist, thinks Brooklyn’s uncharacteristic outpouring was the result of a desperate need to reclaim some of his PR-savvy family. Speaking out loud after a while of silence is frequently not impulsive, but a last-resort boundary, she told the Mirror.
“Estrangement frequently develops when repeated attempts at private repair fail, particularly when there are power imbalances, loyalty conflicts, or emotional coercion,” according to the report. When private channels no longer feel secure or useful, public disclosure may be a means of reclaiming agency.
Brooklyn’s claims of “manipulation” and “control” are difficult to swallow for those who are familiar with David and Victoria. Their once-unbreakable family unit has been destroyed overnight, according to those who frequently refer to them as devoted parents who believe family “is everything.” Their efforts to reconcile have been ongoing despite the intense public outcry.
When Brooklyn and Nicola missed David’s 50th birthday bash, a source told the Mirror: “Victoria feels betrayed because she’s done everything she can to make them both feel welcome and Nicola like another daughter. But she feels it’s been thrown back in her face. She would normally do anything to avoid a family fallout, but she thinks they’re both being unreasonable.”
And now that Brooklyn has publicly exposed their feud, it seems there is no way to end it. Victoria is “shocked to pieces” by her son’s behavior, according to a source. They continue to blame Nicola because they believe she put him up for this, and it’s all due to her. However, as Brooklyn put it, this was required. He wants to control their narrative, which is oppressive.
In recent years, Brooklyn has appeared to push back against the family narrative that once defined him, choosing to live in the US with his wife, Nicola Peltz Beckham, and increasingly distancing himself from the public image long associated with his parents.
Brooklyn asserted in a bombshell statement on Monday that his parents were “ruining” his relationship with Nicola right away, with tensions rising as the wedding date approached. He added that he felt he had been subjected to parental control for the majority of his life and that the narrative that Nicola controlled him was “completely backwards.” According to PR expert Mayah, “what matters most is whether the person feels they have agency.” The difficulty arises when someone begins to question whether or not I chose to be who I was destined to be.
Source: Mirror
Leave a Reply