News

Bargain Hunt star loses jail sentence appeal over sales to ‘Hezbollah financier’

https://i2-prod.mirror.co.uk/incoming/article36152327.ece/ALTERNATES/s615/0_Oghenochuko-Ojiri-court-case.jpg

A Bargain Hunt expert was given a jail sentence for selling high-end art to a US national who had been arrested on suspicion of financing Hezbollah.

A BBC Bargain Hunt art expert, who was jailed for failing to report a series of high-value art sales to a man suspected of financing militant group Hezbollah, has lost an appeal against his sentence.

Oghenochuko Ojiri was jailed for two and a half years and a further year on licence in June for selling artwork worth around £140,000 to Nazem Ahmad, a man designated by US authorities as a suspected financier for the Lebanese organisation.

The 53-year-old is the first person alleged to have been charged with the offence because he had previously admitted guilt to eight crimes under section 21A of the Terrorism Act 2000.

Ojiri’s lawyers told the Court of Appeal on Wednesday that the art dealer should be sentenced to a lower sentence. They argued that the artist was “naive.”

However, three senior judges decided against the claim and said Ojiri “knew what he was doing.” There can be a lot of things said in his favor, according to Lord Justice Edis, who is seated alongside Judge Samantha Leigh and Mr. Justice Martin Spencer. However, we must accept that he poses a naive offender’s role.

He may have been an inexperienced art dealer, but by the time this series of transactions began, he was fully aware of his obligations, of Ahmad’s activities, and of the causes of those obligations.

He continued, “He was committing these crimes in order to make a sizable sum of money,” and he knew what he was doing. That is not at all naive.

In January 2020, Ojiri was accused of failing to report information about transactions in the regulated art market sector on or before October 2020 due to new money laundering laws that were passed by the HMRC.

According to the prosecution, Ojiri was the owner and manager of the Ramp Gallery at the time. According to a previous hearing, Ojiri was aware that Mr. Ahmad, who was alleged to be based in Beirut, had been arrested in the US.

According to US prosecutors, Mr. Ahmad used “high-value art and diamonds” to launder money and finance the organization. He is a “major Hezbollah financial donor.” He is accused of avoiding terrorism sanctions by using front companies to buy more than 160 million pounds of artwork and diamond services.

Hezbollah is a Shia Islamist political and militant group based in Lebanon, backed by Iran and known for its armed resistance against Israel.

The entire organization, including both its political and military wing, has been declared a terrorist organization in the UK since 2019.

Mrs Justice Cheema-Grubb, sentencing, told Ojiri he had been involved in a commercial relationship “for prestige and profit”, and that he had been “seeking the kudos of dealing with an eminent name in the dealing world ”.

On Wednesday, Gavin Irwin, who was representing Ojiri, testified for the Court of Appeal, claiming the judge did not consider mitigating factors in the case and did not take into account Ojiri’s naivety or inexperience.

This was not a man who was ignorant or uninterested in the change in the law, according to Crown Prosecution Service spokesperson Lyndon Harris.

He added that there were instances of Ojiri “changing the details on invoices to conceal Mr. Ahmad’s identity,” citing the offence as being “a serious example of a section 21A offence.”

Although the case “did not involve any money moving from the appellant to any terrorist organization or any other criminal source,” Ojiri “went to some trouble” to “disclose Mr. Ahmad’s identity,” according to Lord Justice Edis. He came to the conclusion that the phrase “was not fundamentally excessive or wrong.”

Ojiri, of Brent, north London, has appeared on a number of BBC shows, including Bargain Hunt and Antiques Road Trip, as a freelance presenter.

Although he was detained while filming a BBC TV program, it is known that he hasn’t contributed to the company’s programming since 2023.

A prison officer informed the court that he had “refused to attend,” but he was scheduled to show up at the hearing via videolink from jail.

Continue reading the article.

Bargain Hunt star loses jail sentence appeal over sales to ‘Hezbollah financier’

https://i2-prod.mirror.co.uk/incoming/article36152327.ece/ALTERNATES/s615/0_Oghenochuko-Ojiri-court-case.jpg

A Bargain Hunt expert was given a jail sentence for selling high-end art to a US national who had been arrested on suspicion of financing Hezbollah.

A BBC Bargain Hunt art expert, who was jailed for failing to report a series of high-value art sales to a man suspected of financing militant group Hezbollah, has lost an appeal against his sentence.

Oghenochuko Ojiri was jailed for two and a half years and a further year on licence in June for selling artwork worth around £140,000 to Nazem Ahmad, a man designated by US authorities as a suspected financier for the Lebanese organisation.

The 53-year-old is the first person alleged to have been charged with the offence because he had previously admitted guilt to eight crimes under section 21A of the Terrorism Act 2000.

Ojiri’s lawyers told the Court of Appeal on Wednesday that the art dealer should be sentenced to a lower sentence. They argued that the artist was “naive.”

However, three senior judges decided against the claim and said Ojiri “knew what he was doing.” There can be a lot of things said in his favor, according to Lord Justice Edis, who is seated alongside Judge Samantha Leigh and Mr. Justice Martin Spencer. However, we must accept that he poses a naive offender’s role.

He may have been an inexperienced art dealer, but by the time this series of transactions began, he was fully aware of his obligations, of Ahmad’s activities, and of the causes of those obligations.

He continued, “He was committing these crimes in order to make a sizable sum of money,” and he knew what he was doing. That is not at all naive.

In January 2020, Ojiri was accused of failing to report information about transactions in the regulated art market sector on or before October 2020 due to new money laundering laws that were passed by the HMRC.

According to the prosecution, Ojiri was the owner and manager of the Ramp Gallery at the time. According to a previous hearing, Ojiri was aware that Mr. Ahmad, who was alleged to be based in Beirut, had been arrested in the US.

According to US prosecutors, Mr. Ahmad used “high-value art and diamonds” to launder money and finance the organization. He is a “major Hezbollah financial donor.” He is accused of avoiding terrorism sanctions by using front companies to buy more than 160 million pounds of artwork and diamond services.

Hezbollah is a Shia Islamist political and militant group based in Lebanon, backed by Iran and known for its armed resistance against Israel.

The entire organization, including both its political and military wing, has been declared a terrorist organization in the UK since 2019.

Mrs Justice Cheema-Grubb, sentencing, told Ojiri he had been involved in a commercial relationship “for prestige and profit”, and that he had been “seeking the kudos of dealing with an eminent name in the dealing world ”.

On Wednesday, Gavin Irwin, who was representing Ojiri, testified for the Court of Appeal, claiming the judge did not consider mitigating factors in the case and did not take into account Ojiri’s naivety or inexperience.

This was not a man who was ignorant or uninterested in the change in the law, according to Crown Prosecution Service spokesperson Lyndon Harris.

He added that there were instances of Ojiri “changing the details on invoices to conceal Mr. Ahmad’s identity,” citing the offence as being “a serious example of a section 21A offence.”

Although the case “did not involve any money moving from the appellant to any terrorist organization or any other criminal source,” Ojiri “went to some trouble” to “disclose Mr. Ahmad’s identity,” according to Lord Justice Edis. He came to the conclusion that the phrase “was not fundamentally excessive or wrong.”

Ojiri, of Brent, north London, has appeared on a number of BBC shows, including Bargain Hunt and Antiques Road Trip, as a freelance presenter.

Although he was detained while filming a BBC TV program, it is known that he hasn’t contributed to the company’s programming since 2023.

A prison officer informed the court that he had “refused to attend,” but he was scheduled to show up at the hearing via videolink from jail.

Continue reading the article.

Who is Selling Sunset Emma Hernan’s boyfriend and are they still together?

https://i2-prod.mirror.co.uk/incoming/article36151970.ece/ALTERNATES/s615/0_Emma-and-Blake-in-Selling-Sunset.png

In season nine, Emma Hernan, the star of Sunset, flaunts her boyfriend Blake Davis. What’s the most recent news about the couple?

In the newest episode of Netflix’s Selling Sunset, reality TV star Emma Hernan reveals her romantic relationship to partner Blake Davis.

Today (October 29), The Oppenheim Group aired ten additional episodes that explored the most recent sales and personal experiences of real estate agents.

Early in the new series, Emma, 33, shows her boyfriend Blake, 28, to her co-stars Chrishell Stause and Chelsea Lazkani, who both have varying personalities.

Blake reveals during their brief conversation that he has never had a fruit or vegetable in his life before revealing that his body odor is most likely a result of “vodka and chicken fingers.”

Chrishell, who was Emma’s former best friend, kept her sincere thoughts about the romance a secret. She stated to the audience, “I obviously want to try to get to know him and I want to try to get past my misconceptions, if that’s what they are.” However, it resembles a conversation with a young child. or a drunken-teenager.

What’s the most recent news about Blake Davis’ romance with Emma from The O Group?

Blake Davis, who is he?

Without prior authorization, content cannot be displayed.

Blake is an Atlanta-based real estate agent and developer for the 28-year-old, as Emma reveals on the show.

While the couple has had an on-and-off relationship, Blake’s Instagram page is packed with pictures of them dating back to 2024.

Emma said on the show that seeing her partner with her family is what really makes her like him. He is very focused on the family.

Despite being smitten, the Netflix star later confirmed she split up with Blake, shortly after sharing that they were considering marriage.

Emma and Blake are they still together?

Without prior authorization, content cannot be displayed.

The couple split up in the new season, which was shot between January and February of this year.

However, they reportedly rekindled sometime after the show before calling it quits again this summer. But based on Blake’s Instagram, the pair have since reconnected and continue to travel the world together.

He shared a number of vacation shots of their trip to the Turks and Caicos Islands just last week.

Continue reading the article.

Emma emailed a comment about the post, “Turks with Bae,” followed by an emoji of a love heart. And Blake responded, “Love you, babe.”

Who is Selling Sunset Emma Hernan’s boyfriend and are they still together?

https://i2-prod.mirror.co.uk/incoming/article36151970.ece/ALTERNATES/s615/0_Emma-and-Blake-in-Selling-Sunset.png

In season nine, Emma Hernan, the star of Sunset, flaunts her boyfriend Blake Davis. What’s the most recent news about the couple?

In the newest episode of Netflix’s Selling Sunset, reality TV star Emma Hernan reveals her romantic relationship to partner Blake Davis.

Today (October 29), The Oppenheim Group aired ten additional episodes that explored the most recent sales and personal experiences of real estate agents.

Early in the new series, Emma, 33, shows her boyfriend Blake, 28, to her co-stars Chrishell Stause and Chelsea Lazkani, who both have varying personalities.

Blake reveals during their brief conversation that he has never had a fruit or vegetable in his life before revealing that his body odor is most likely a result of “vodka and chicken fingers.”

Chrishell, who was Emma’s former best friend, kept her sincere thoughts about the romance a secret. She stated to the audience, “I obviously want to try to get to know him and I want to try to get past my misconceptions, if that’s what they are.” However, it resembles a conversation with a young child. or a drunken-teenager.

What’s the most recent news about Blake Davis’ romance with Emma from The O Group?

Blake Davis, who is he?

Without prior authorization, content cannot be displayed.

Blake is an Atlanta-based real estate agent and developer for the 28-year-old, as Emma reveals on the show.

While the couple has had an on-and-off relationship, Blake’s Instagram page is packed with pictures of them dating back to 2024.

Emma said on the show that seeing her partner with her family is what really makes her like him. He is very focused on the family.

Despite being smitten, the Netflix star later confirmed she split up with Blake, shortly after sharing that they were considering marriage.

Emma and Blake are they still together?

Without prior authorization, content cannot be displayed.

The couple split up in the new season, which was shot between January and February of this year.

However, they reportedly rekindled sometime after the show before calling it quits again this summer. But based on Blake’s Instagram, the pair have since reconnected and continue to travel the world together.

He shared a number of vacation shots of their trip to the Turks and Caicos Islands just last week.

Continue reading the article.

Emma emailed a comment about the post, “Turks with Bae,” followed by an emoji of a love heart. And Blake responded, “Love you, babe.”

Real seek ‘substantial damages’ over Super League ruling

Images courtesy of Getty

After losing a court case over the lackedluster European Super League, Real Madrid will seek “substantial damages” from Uefa.

A May 2024 decision was upheld by a ruling from the Provincial Court of Madrid on Wednesday.

In that decision, FIFA discovered that La Liga, the Spanish Football Federation (RFEF), and Uefa were engaging in anti-competitive behavior and were abusing their position of authority by forbidding teams from joining the breakaway league.

The most recent ruling, according to Uefa, “necessitates” the Super League project and does not “refuse” Uefa’s current authorisation guidelines.”

In a separate decision, the European Court of Justice determined in December 2023 that it was unlawful for clubs to be banned from playing in a European Super League, leading to Uefa’s subsequent revision of its rules.

Real Madrid applauds the regional court’s decision to dismiss the appeals made by Uefa, the RFEF, and La Liga, confirming that the Super League’s actions gravely violated European Union competition laws and violated its position, according to the 15-time European champions’ statement.

However, Uefa stated in a statement that “these rules ensure that any cross-border competitions are evaluated on objective, transparent, non-discriminatory, and proportionate criteria.”

This development comes after the European Parliament reiterated its opposition to “breakaway competitions” by reaffirming its position in a landmark resolution this month.

“Uefa will carefully review the decision before making any further adjustments,” the statement states.

Uefa added that it will continue to “protect the protection of the football pyramid” and that it is “firmly committed to the European sports model, built on sporting merit, open access, solidarity, and the preservation of the unity of European football.”

La Liga reiterated its “firm commitment” to the “integrity and stability of national competitions” and “respect for the European Union’s competition rules, despite the Provincial Court’s decision.

This decision, according to its president Javier Tebas, does not in any way represent an endorsement of Super League or other formats. It merely reiterates the importance of transparent and objective regulation.

The breakaway competition’s signings for 12 clubs, including Arsenal, Chelsea, Liverpool, Manchester City, Manchester United, and Tottenham, were the start of the European Super League saga in April 2021.

Fans, other European leagues, and even the government were outraged, and the plans were immediately voided.

Analysis of “The truth lies somewhere in the middle”

Don’t anticipate the European Super League project to resurface as a result of today’s court ruling.

The only remaining members of the original 12 who were prepared to leave the Champions League are Real Madrid and Barcelona, roughly. After the backlash from its supporters effectively led to its collapse, English clubs refused to play it again, while Paris St-Germain and other German clubs immediately opposed it.

Whatever the La Liga champion might say, Madrid have been engaged in what has always been a losing battle. They have continued to go through the courts to “work for the good of global football and fans,” as Madrid put it. Or, as it appears, a portion of compensation.

The parties’ responses to the original ruling, which led to today’s appeal, have remained essentially the same as they did in May of 2024. Madrid will agree with them that the European Super League should have been allowed to continue, but Uefa will contend that it doesn’t offer any of that support.

The answer is somewhere in between. In addition to the European Court of Justice, Uefa has lost a number of court cases that have resulted in unlawful rulings. The European Super League is dead in the water, and it was always going to be, but Wednesday’s decision rubberstamps that once more.

Any decision based on a 2021 decision is irrelevant because Uefa insists its regulations have been revised twice in recent years.

related subjects

  • Spanish La Liga
  • Football in Europe
  • Real Madrid
  • Football

More on this story.

Mistakes not ‘Crashgate’ cost Massa title, court hears

Images courtesy of Getty

A court has heard that former Ferrari driver Felipe Massa “performed very poorly” at the 2008 Singapore Grand Prix, which was the site of the “Crashgate” scandal, which cost him the race win and ultimately the drivers’ world championship.

The 44-year-old Brazilian is suing for damages from Lewis Hamilton for McLaren over an alleged “conspiracy” that he claims cost him the title.

Massa is requesting about $64 million plus interest from former Formula 1 boss Bernie Ecclestone, Formula 1, and the FIA on Wednesday, the first day of a three-day hearing at the High Court in London.

When Fernando Alonso, who finished 15th on the grid, collided deliberately to derail a safety car, Massa was in command of the race.

Ferrari pitted Massa in the safety-car period, but he was unable to stop because of a malfunction in the stop, which sent him to the points.

Ecclestone and then-FIA president Max Mosley claimed in an interview with F1 Insider in 2023 that they were aware of Piquet’s accident on purpose but didn’t take any action in an effort to “protect the sport and save it from a huge scandal.”

Ecclestone, who turned 95 on Tuesday, “does not remember giving this interview,” according to Quest.

The defendants contend that Massa had enough legal knowledge to bring a lawsuit in 2008 and 2009, which should have resulted in the dismissal of the case.

After the publication of the Ecclestone interview, Massa’s attorneys claim that he did not have sufficient information to file a lawsuit.

Marshals recover Nelson Piquet Jr's car after he crashed into the wall in Singapore in 2008 Images courtesy of Getty

What transpired in “Crashgate”?

When Piquet intentionally crashed at Turn 17 on lap 14 to bring out a safety car, Massa was leading the inaugural race in Singapore from pole position.

Alonso, who had already stopped earlier than his rivals, benefited from that.

Ferrari accidentally knocked over a crew member during the safety-car period during the pit stop, forcing Massa to leave the pits with the fuel hose attached to the vehicle.

He rejoined the track toward the back of the field, finishing 13th overall outside of points.

Hamilton, who finished third, increased Hamilton’s championship lead over Massa by seven points.

Piquet at the time described the wall’s “simple mistake” as a “simple mistake.”

However, when Renault dropped him in the 2009 season, he revealed that the team had asked him to deliberately crash, leading to an investigation that saw the suspension of both the team’s chief technical officer Pat Symonds and its team principal Flavio Briatore for several years.

Alonso was found innocent of all charges, but the FIA found no proof that he knew about the scheme.

related subjects

  • Formula 1