Slider1
previous arrow
next arrow

News

Iran to ‘boycott’ World Cup in US but will not withdraw from 2026 event

The Iranian national team are continuing to prepare for the FIFA World Cup 2026 finals and have no intention of pulling out of the tournament but do intend to “boycott” matches in United States, football chief Mehdi Taj has insisted.

Iran were one of the first nations to qualify for the finals but their participation has been in doubt since the conflict between the Islamic republic and the United States began in ⁠late February.

Recommended Stories

list of 4 itemsend of list

The tournament runs from June 11 to July 19 and is being co-hosted by the US, Mexico and Canada.

Team Melli are scheduled to play all three of their opening-round group matches in the US, but Taj said on Monday the Iranian FA (FFIRI) was negotiating with FIFA to have them moved to Mexico.

Iran will play Nigeria on March 27 and Costa Rica four days later in ‌Antalya as part of a four-nation invitational tournament that had to be moved from Jordan because of the conflict in the Middle East.

“The national team is holding a training camp in Turkiye, and we will also play two friendly matches there,” FFIRI President Taj was quoted as saying by the Fars News Agency on Wednesday. “We will boycott America, but we will not boycott the World Cup.”

Taj was speaking on Wednesday as he welcomed the players from the women’s national team back to Iran at the border crossing from Turkiye after their protracted journey from Australia.

Iranian players in white
Iran’s Mohammad Mohebi celebrates scoring against United Arab Emirates in an AFC qualifier for the World Cup in Tehran in March 2025 [Majid Asgaripour/Reuters]

All of the delegation, who were ⁠in Australia for the Women’s Asian Cup, were offered asylum by the host nation because ⁠of fears for their safety in Iran. While seven accepted, only two ended up staying.

US President Donald Trump had urged Australia to offer the players asylum and later said that while the Iranian men were welcome to play in the US, it might not be appropriate for their “life and safety”.

Trump later ⁠stressed any threat to the players would not come from the United States, but Taj – a former member of Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps – used the president’s statement as grounds for demanding ⁠the venue switch.

Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum said on Tuesday that her country would ⁠be open to hosting Iran’s World Cup matches against New Zealand, Belgium and Egypt in June, but the final say on any venue switch would be FIFA’s.

Football’s world governing body said it was in contact with FFIRI but was “looking forward to all participating teams competing as per the match schedule announced on ‌6 December 2025”.

Beau Busch, the Asia Pacific president of football players’ union FIFPRO, said it was FIFA’s duty to ensure the safety of everyone involved at the World Cup.

“FIFA have an institutional responsibility to protect human rights,” the Australian told Reuters.

Truck Collides With Car At Kara Bridge As Gridlock Worsens

A truck–car collision has compounded the already severe traffic congestion around Kara Bridge along the Lagos-Ibadan Expressway.

The incident, which occurred on Thursday morning on the outbound lane from Lagos towards Mowe, involved a Mack truck and a Toyota Camry.

The truck rammed into the car, leaving it with significant damage to its bonnet.

Officials of the Federal Road Safety Corps (FRSC), alongside other security operatives and traffic management authorities, are on the scene to manage the situation and ease vehicular movement.

The collision aggravated the heavy gridlock that has plagued the Kara Bridge corridor in recent days.

READ ALSO: Borno Bombings: Normalcy Has Been Restored To Maiduguri — Police

Traffic build-up has reportedly extended far beyond the immediate axis, with spillovers reaching Otedola Bridge, Berger, and other adjoining routes.

Commuters have continued to experience prolonged delays around that corridor, with some journeys lasting between three and five hours for relatively short distances.

The worsening traffic situation has largely been attributed to ongoing rehabilitation work on the bridge.

The Federal Ministry of Works earlier commenced repairs to replace damaged expansion joints on the outbound carriageway, leading to partial lane closures and diversions.

The current phase of the project, which resumed on March 10, 2026, is expected to last approximately two weeks, with a tentative completion date of March 24, 2026.

In addition, increased vehicular movement linked to the Eid and public holiday period has contributed to the surge in traffic volume.

Tuchel’s dilemmas as he picks last squad before World Cup selection

Alex Howell

Football reporter
  • 39 Comments

When Thomas Tuchel names his England squad for the two March friendlies on Friday it will give a major hint as to who will be on the plane for this summer’s World Cup.

England cruised through qualifying with a perfect record of eight wins out of eight and Tuchel largely used a settled XI as he focused on building a club feel within his squad, which could be away in the USA for the best part of two months.

But with seven of the XI – Jordan Pickford, Reece James, Ezri Konsa, Declan Rice, Elliot Anderson, Bukayo Saka and Harry Kane – near enough nailed on to start, there are still some dilemmas for the England boss to work through before the first World Cup group game against Croatia.

Who will be England’s number 10?

The issue that has created the most noise since Tuchel took charge is about how he has dealt with Jude Bellingham and the battle for the number 10 position.

The Real Madrid midfielder was left out of the October camp after injury despite wanting to join up as Tuchel favoured keeping a settled group after excellent performances.

Aston Villa midfielder Morgan Rogers impressed in qualifying, starting five of England’s eight group games, and has become the first-choice number 10.

“Rather than finding positions for my best players just so that I can have them on the field, I prefer to put everyone in their best positions and have some competition,” Tuchel said when speaking about the pair going up against each other.

There is no denying Bellingham is one of the best midfielders in the world when he is fit and in form, but the midfielder is currently working his way back from a hamstring injury and has not played since 1 February.

It’s easy to forget that Bellingham is just 22, given he has already produced some iconic moments for England such as his last-gasp bicycle kick against Slovakia at Euro 2024 and his assist for Cole Palmer’s goal in the final.

Tuchel has made a point about how his England team need to be settled and united, but if Bellingham is producing his best for Madrid at the end of the season, the England manager has a very difficult decision on his hands.

Chelsea’s Cole Palmer, who has also had injury problems this season, has barely played under Tuchel, featuring for just 65 minutes.

The centre-back question

It’s never ideal going into a major tournament without knowing your first-choice centre-back partnership but that is where England are currently.

Tuchel has spoken repeatedly about his admiration for Manchester City centre-back John Stones but because of fitness issues, the defender has only been available for four of England’s 10 games since he took over.

Aston Villa’s Konsa started six of England’s qualifiers and is certain to be part of the backline.

Marc Guehi has missed two international camps under Tuchel through injury, but he was one of the standout players for England at Euro 2024 and then won the FA Cup with Crystal Palace before moving to title-chasing Manchester City.

Stones will be included if he is fit – but who Tuchel picks to start from those three leading into the summer will be intriguing.

Meanwhile, Manchester United centre-back Harry Maguire is making a late charge for the squad as the Red Devils continue their resurgence.

The left-back problem

The left-back spot being a problem position is not new for England.

Gareth Southgate opted to take Luke Shaw as his only natural left-back to the last major tournament with Kieran Trippier filling that position and Bukayo Saka also playing in a modified wing-back role.

During this qualifying campaign, Tuchel has used Myles Lewis-Skelly, Nico O’Reilly, James, Djed Spence and Tino Livramento as full-backs on the left.

O’Reilly has been excellent for both Manchester City and England this season but has now moved into midfield for his club side.

Lewis Hall has missed most of the England camps under Tuchel through injury, although he played for the under-21s in November.

He is performing well for Newcastle and the games against Uruguay and Japan give Tuchel a last chance to see how he would fit into his 4-2-3-1 system.

Back-up striker and late runners

Being the back-up striker to record goalscorer and England captain Kane is not an easy task.

Ollie Watkins has had the role for the past couple of years but after scoring just two goals in his past 10 games for Villa, there is debate around who deserves to go to the World Cup in that role.

Dominic Calvert-Lewin has had a good season for Leeds but his scoring rate has slowed down in recent weeks.

The 35-year-old Brighton striker Danny Welbeck has signed a contract extension with the Seagulls and is having an excellent campaign with 10 goals in the Premier League.

Welbeck has not played for England since a friendly against Switzerland in 2018, but has the quality and experience of playing in big matches for his country that could be beneficial to Tuchel.

Arsenal’s Rice and Nottingham Forest’s Anderson will be England’s pivots in midfield with Adam Wharton the next on the list – Alex Scott of Bournemouth was called up last time out but did not get on the pitch.

When Tuchel names this squad it will make clear who still has a lot of work to do to make the plane in the summer.

Related topics

  • Football
  • England Men’s Football Team
  • FIFA World Cup

Saints and Bath lead race for top four as Prem returns

Sophie Hurcom and Brent PilnickBBC Sport England
  • 4 Comments

It has been eight weeks since we last had a game of Prem rugby, with the league taking its now annual break for the Six Nations.

We have had 10 rounds of the competition so far with eight still to come before the top four is finalised and the end of season play-offs confirmed.

Just 11 points separate sixth place from first, perfectly setting up an exciting race to clinch a spot in the top four over the coming weeks, while four teams already find themselves cut adrift.

    • 27 February

Leading the way

It is perhaps not a surprise that the past two winners of the Prem title – Northampton and Bath – are the two clubs jostling for first place in the table.

The two sides have traded top spot every round since the third weekend of the competition, until Northampton opened up a slender two-point gap at the end of last year with a scintillating display to comprehensively beat Bath at the Recreation Ground.

Saints’ attack has been blistering and they have scored the most points of any club, averaging 39 a game – they put 66 points past Harlequins and scored 43 away at Sale in January alone.

They will perhaps face the biggest hangover from the Six Nations, however – nine of their players were in England’s squad, with scrum-half Alex Mitchell now out with an injured hamstring.

After their own all-conquering treble-winning 2024-25, expectations have been high on Bath to back it up.

They still boast arguably the strongest squad in the division with the ability to rotate a team like no other, but a narrow loss away to Leicester, a second-half collapse against Exeter and the defeat by Northampton when they looked off-colour show Bath are far from unstoppable.

Head of rugby, Johann van Graan, alluded after the Prem final last June that winning multiple titles is the goal though to create a real legacy – only Saracens and Leicester have won back-to-back Prem titles in the past 20 years.

Top four contenders

Harry Randall holds the ball close to his chest with his right arm while standing on the pitchGetty Images

The chasing pack of Bristol, Leicester, Exeter and Saracens will all fancy they can at the very least make the top four, if not push for a home semi-final.

The Bears return to league action against the Tigers having won their past five Prem matches, and Pat Lam’s side have been boosted by the return from injury of scrum-half Harry Randall and winger Gabriel Ibitoye.

Upcoming fixtures also look kind to Bristol – after their trip to Leicester this weekend they take on strugglers Harlequins, Gloucester and Newcastle in successive games.

Bears will hope to maintain the spot in the play-offs they got last season, but can they go one step further and make a first-ever Prem final?

Exeter have in many ways been the surprise package of the season after a disastrous 2024-25 campaign saw them finish second-from-bottom.

Twelve months ago, Exeter 2.0 had crashed, but the Chiefs have more than switched the Sandy Park computer off and on again.

Exeter 2.5 (if you like) has seen a new coaching staff under long-serving boss Rob Baxter get the best out of a squad that has had some key additions.

If they can get star centre Len Ikitau fit again from his shoulder injury he will form a formidable midfield combination with England’s Henry Slade.

Immanuel Feyi-Waboso’s fitness will also be key after he missed the Six Nations with a hamstring issue, but with impressive youngsters Paul Brown-Bampoe and Campbell Ridl on the wings – and the experienced Olly Woodburn – they still carry a try-scoring threat.

Geoff Parling watches a training scrum from distanceGetty Images

In his first 10 Prem games as Leicester boss, former England and British and Irish Lions forward Geoff Parling has bettered his side’s record from last season with seven wins and three losses this term versus six wins, a draw and three losses in 2024-25.

But they have arguably the toughest run-in of all the sides in the Prem – their last four games see them host champions Northampton, go to Sale, meet Exeter at home and end the regular season away at Bath.

If Leicester can command a play-off place after that run of games their title credentials could once again be realistic.

They return to league action off the back of a commanding win against an inexperienced Exeter side in the Prem Rugby Cup final, when they cruised to a 66-14 statement win, to add a first trophy to the cabinet since they won the Prem title in 2022.

You would never rule out Saracens, but even less so a Saracens side which will want to give departing director of rugby Mark McCall the send off his glittering time at the club deserves.

Bristol are the only title-chasing side they have beaten in the league this season – Leicester, Bath, Exeter and Northampton have all beaten the north London side – results that put them four points off fourth-placed Leicester.

But their 73-14 trouncing of Newcastle in their last Prem match shows that on their day they are still capable of beating anyone handsomely.

Their first two games could well make or break their season as they face the top two – first a trip to Bath and then a home game against Northampton.

Quartet cut adrift

Alex Sanderson standing on a pitch with his arms folded across his chest looking up towards the skyShutterstock

It is hard to fathom that Sale, the most consistent team in the Prem in terms of finishing in the top four every one of the past three seasons, are all-but out of the running for the play-offs already.

A bruising defeat in their last outing by Saints, who scored seven tries and left more on the pitch, leaves them 16 points off the top four.

Although director of rugby Alex Sanderson said his side were “not in freefall” he did concede their chances of making the play-offs were remote.

Poor away form has cost the Sharks with the team not recording a win on the road in the league this campaign – but they are still in the Champions Cup and a run through the knockout stages, as well as a top eight finish, will be some saving grace.

Trailing even further back are Gloucester, Harlequins and Newcastle who count only four wins out of 30 between them and whose combined points total would not even put them near the top four.

Bottom side Newcastle’s league form is as it has been for the past few seasons with one win and nine losses but many fans will be looking at this as a transition season and the promise of better from the 2026-27 campaign following their takeover by Red Bull last summer.

Harlequins players walkingGetty Images

For Gloucester and Harlequins, positivity has been harder to find.

The Cherry and Whites have just one solitary win, against Harlequins, out of 10 games but a battling performance against Bath at the end of January suggests the tide might be turning.

Changes have been made to their leadership team in the shape of Chris Boyd, who spearheaded Northampton’s previous title tilts, and Rob Burgess from Bath, with the hope of bigger picture improvements being made.

But bringing pride back to the Shed and securing a top-eight spot to ensure Champions Cup rugby next season is their only target between now and June.

For two-times champions Harlequins the spiral downwards seems even more deep-rooted. Ninth place – or second from bottom – would represent their lowest league finish since they were promoted back to the top tier in 2006.

They are searching for a new director of rugby and have not won in the league since beating Newcastle on 25 October.

This weekend’s game against Gloucester could define how bad their season could still get, if they come away with another defeat.

Round 11 fixtures

Friday, 20 March

Bath v Saracens (19:45 GMT)

Saturday, 21 March

Harlequins v Gloucester (15:00 GMT)

Northampton v Newcastle (15:00 GMT)

Exeter v Sale (15:05 GMT)

Sunday, 22 March

Related topics

  • Exeter Chiefs
  • Newcastle Red Bulls
  • Sale
  • Northampton Saints
  • Gloucester
  • Saracens
  • Rugby Union
  • Bath
  • Bristol
  • Leicester Tigers
  • Harlequins

Iran war: What’s the Jones Act, and why has Trump suspended it for 60 days?

United States President Donald Trump has temporarily waived a century-old shipping law to help ease the cost of transporting oil, gas and other commodities within the US.

The move allows foreign-flagged vessels to transport goods between US ports for the next 60 days, a step taken to ease the movement of energy supplies across the country.

Recommended Stories

list of 2 itemsend of list

“This action will allow vital resources like oil, natural gas, fertilizer, and coal to flow freely to US ports for sixty days,” White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt wrote on X.

Here is what we know:

What is the Jones Act?

The Jones Act, formally known as the Merchant Marine Act of 1920, was passed by Congress to rebuild the United States’s shipping industry after German U-boats devastated the country’s merchant fleet during World War I. The law was sponsored by Senator Wesley Jones of Washington state.

At its core, the act requires that any ship transporting goods or passengers between US ports must be built in the US, owned by US citizens and crewed primarily by Americans. This in effect bars foreign-flagged vessels from participating in domestic maritime trade.

The law allows for temporary waivers in the “interest of national defense,” according to the US Maritime Administration, typically granted by the Department of Homeland Security or the Department of Defense.

The Jones Act was also designed to ensure the US could rely on its own merchant fleet during times of war. It continues to be strongly backed by some shipping companies, labour unions and national security advocates.

Critics, however, argue that restricting foreign competition has driven up shipping costs.

Why is Trump waiving Jones Act requirements now?

Oil markets have been volatile since the start of the US-Israel war on Iran. Tanker traffic through the Strait of Hormuz, a key global chokepoint, has been severely disrupted, affecting exports from major Middle Eastern producers. Commercial vessels carrying everything from fuel to pharmaceuticals and computer chips have also been delayed or have come under attack.

That disruption has pushed up prices worldwide. Brent crude, the global benchmark, was trading near $109 a barrel on Wednesday, up from about $70 before the war. US crude has climbed to roughly $98 a barrel. At the pump, prices have surged, with the US national average for regular gasoline reaching $3.84 a gallon, according to the American Autombile Association, about 86 cents — more than 25 percent — higher than pre-war levels.

With supplies under strain and shipping routes disrupted, countries are scrambling for alternatives.

By allowing foreign-flagged vessels to move energy products between US ports, the administration hopes to reduce transport costs and increase supply. The waiver also applies to fertilisers, which are in high demand during the current spring planting season.

But the decision has drawn criticism. The American Maritime Partnership, a coalition representing US vessel owners, operators and maritime unions, said it was “deeply concerned” the 60-day waiver could be misused, displacing American workers and companies.

The group also argued the measure would have little effect on lowering fuel prices for consumers.

How could suspending Jones Act requirements affect US petrol prices?

A range of factors shape fuel prices, and analysts say easing domestic shipping restrictions is unlikely to be a sweeping solution.

“The waiver will simplify logistics, making it slightly cheaper and easier for products to flow,” said Patrick De Haan, the head of petroleum analysis at GasBuddy, an app that tracks fuel costs.

But De Haan warned not to expect steep price drops from the waiver.

“It won’t have a ‘visible’ impact in reducing prices at the pump as of now; it will merely offset rising retail prices. I estimate it may offset 3 to 10 cents per gallon ($0.007 to $0.02 per litre) of price increases,” he said.

The waiver is part of a broader effort by Washington to boost supply. The Treasury Department has eased sanctions to allow US companies to do business with Venezuela’s state oil firm, while also temporarily opening the door for Russian oil to re-enter global markets.

At the same time, the International Energy Agency (IEA) has pledged to release 400 million barrels of oil from emergency reserves, the largest coordinated release in its history, with the US contributing 172 million barrels from its Strategic Petroleum Reserve.