Slider1
previous arrow
next arrow

News

Spain-Argentina Finalissima in Qatar cancelled

The Finalissima between Argentina and Spain has been cancelled because of the war in the Middle East.

European champions Spain were set to play Copa America champions Argentina in Qatar on 26 March.

Uefa said proposals to hold the match at Real Madrid’s Bernabeu, or play a two-legged game in Madrid and Buenos Aires, were rejected by Argentina.

Uefa said: “Due to the current political situation in the region, the Finalissima cannot be played as hoped in Qatar.

BBC Sport has contacted the Argentine FA for comment.

Uefa said: “Argentina made a counter suggestion to play the game after the World Cup but, as Spain has no available dates, that option had to be ruled out.”

The Spanish FA said it had “worked intensively” to get the game on in any format possible, whether in Spain or at a neutral venue.

It said: “Spain was prepared to play as it has always been stated. They set no conditions.

“Spain, together with Uefa, has offered all possibilities.”

On Saturday the Bahrain and Saudi Arabian Formula 1 Grands Prix due to be held in April were cancelled.

Formula 1 said it is not safe to stage the races because of the conflict across the region.

Related topics

  • European Football
  • Football

More on this story

    • 1 day ago
    A BBC Verify graphic showing a man of Iran with attacks marked as dots - the darker the dots, the greater the number of attacks
    • 19 December 2025
    Argentina lifting the finalissma trophy

RFU determined to root out England inconsistency in review

To play this video you need to enable JavaScript in your browser.

Mike Henson

BBC Sport rugby union news reporter
  • 21 Comments

A review into England’s Six Nations performance will begin in the coming days as coach Steve Borthwick’s Rugby Football Union bosses investigate a historically poor campaign.

England won only one of their five matches – a 48-7 thrashing of Wooden Spoon ‘winners’ Wales in the opening round – and finished fifth in the table.

A solitary victory is their worst return from a Six Nations campaign since the tournament admitted Italy in 2000.

A much-improved England came within a final play of beating eventual champions France in Paris on Saturday, only to be denied by Thomas Ramos’ match-winning penalty with the clock deep in the red.

However, a group of senior rugby figures, drawn from inside and outside the RFU, will collect feedback from coaches and players about what went wrong over the next few weeks.

    • 7 days ago
    • 1 hour ago

After a first defeat by Italy in 33 Test meetings last weekend, RFU chief executive Bill Sweeney said the organisation “remained fully committed to supporting” Borthwick and his staff despite “hugely disappointing” results.

“We will work together to understand and rectify why we have been unable to meet the expectations and anticipation going into these games,” he added.

Borthwick’s predecessor Eddie Jones was endorsed after a similar investigation into England’s last fifth-placed finish in the Six Nations in 2021.

To play this video you need to enable JavaScript in your browser.

Five years on, few of those will be factors in 2026’s under-performance.

Borthwick has a large backroom staff, led by senior assistant coach Richard Wigglesworth, who oversees defence, with Lee Blackett – recruited from Premiership champions Bath – in charge of the attack.

Kevin Sinfield (kicking and skills), Tom Harrison (scrum), Joe El-Abd (forwards) and Byron McGuigan (contact and back three) were also part of the Six Nations set-up.

The Professional Game Partnership, launched in 2024, also means England have greater control over their top players’ preparation and medical treatment.

However, 15 of their players were part of the summer’s British and Irish Lions hectic tour to Australia.

Itoje, who exceeded guideline limits on the number of minutes top players should play in 2023-24, led the tourists to a 2-1 series win in another busy campaign.

France, who have a policy of resting stars for summer tours, have won five out of the seven Six Nations tournaments directly after a Lions summer.

The 2021 review called for more refereeing input in England’s preparations, given their indiscipline. The team has fallen foul of the officials once more this year, with eight yellow cards shown to them across the five matches.

Matt Dawson and Paul Grayson, both part of England’s Rugby World Cup-winning squad of 2003, believes the answer to ironing out the team’s inconsistencies is within the players themselves.

“I would direct it all at the players,” Dawson told Rugby Union Weekly.

“They were accountable against France, they took responsibility for that and got themselves into a frenzied, physical state to take France apart.

“I saw the players owning it today.”

Grayson added: “The best teams are player-led, not coach-led.

Related topics

  • England Rugby Union
  • Rugby Union

More on this story

What do the first two weeks of the war on Iran portend for the future?

The first two weeks of the Israeli-American assault on Iran have generated enormous amounts of news, propaganda and speculation. Politicians and pundits on all sides have offered contradictory information and analyses that have obscured realities on the ground and overloaded the global public.

As the conflict enters its third week, careful observation can still identify new and critical dynamics that could shape its outcome, the future of the Middle East, and perhaps global confrontations and conditions. They are all new realities that feed into each other to create this destructive moment.

First, the scope of this war has expanded military clashes to more than a dozen states in the region while also entangling countries around the world who assist either side. The global array of states involved in this war is unprecedented. It shatters the assumption that countries can be safe if they stay out of the fighting. That was made clear when Iran decided to attack Gulf states, Iraq and Jordan for hosting US military bases and Cyprus and Turkiye for hosting US and British forces.

Second, the direct impact of the war has rattled most of the world through oil and gas shortages, shipping constraints, higher prices and the prospect of an economic recession. No country can insulate itself from the impacts of the war, whether at the level of the economy or basic family security in foodstuffs, medicines and household energy needs.

Third, the duration of the Israeli-US war on Iran will determine its long-term impacts regionally and globally. The aggressors from Washington and Tel Aviv hoped for a quick and decisive victory. They assumed they could kill and topple the Iranian leadership within a few days but have failed to achieve that after 14 days of unrelenting attacks. Iran and its allies seek a lengthy war that bleeds the attackers’ military capabilities and political endurance and compels them to cease fire and stop trying to turn the entire Middle East into a flaccid collection of supplicants and vassals.

Fourth, the ideological underpinnings of the conflict are just as important as geopolitical realities. Israel and the US are the torchbearers of the last Western settler-colonial campaign in the region, which enabled Zionism to dispossess the indigenous Palestinians and now attempt to assert hegemonic military and economic dominance over everyone else in the region. The Iranians and their allies want instead to check and reverse the colonial onslaught that has plagued virtually every Middle Eastern country since the 19th century and that remains militarily active today.

Fifth, the nature of this war demonstrates we have entered a new age of warfare. The US and Israeli militaries use their superior air and satellite assets to destroy military, industrial and civilian facilities in a brutal aerial campaign. With vastly more limited resources and firepower, Iran and its allies have developed technological and logistical innovations that severely limit the impact of the air assault against them and allow them to continue fighting.

Iran’s use of sophisticated but relatively cheap technology has helped it penetrate US-built air defences worth millions of dollars. Its evasive drones and hypersonic missiles have allowed it to overload and weaken defence systems, such as the Patriot and Terminal High Altitude Area Defense, or THAAD, and hit many targets. There has been extensive damage even in Israel, which boasts the most advanced “Iron Dome” technology and is forced to heavily censor its own media and citizens to hide its weaknesses.

Sixth, Iran has learned important lessons from the last century of Western-Zionist assaults on any party that has tried to resist them. Tehran survived the assassination of Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei and dozens of other leaders in the first days of the war, transitioned its top leadership, and continues to resist and fire back against foes. It has clearly recognised the importance of a decentralised system of warfare: planned leadership successions, durable command and control systems, dispersed weapons manufacturing and storage facilities, and hidden launch platforms for missiles, drones, maritime weapons and other critical assets.

Seventh, the full consequences of the war to date cannot be accurately assessed because complete damage information is not available in most cases. That will come later. But we can see that the attacks by all sides since the US-Israeli opening assault have continued to ignore provisions of international law that should protect civilian areas, essential infrastructure and cultural sites in times of war. The sheer indiscriminate savagery of many of the attacks, especially against civilians, has been shocking. This should come as no surprise, given the horrors of the ongoing US-Israeli genocide in Gaza and Israel’s threats to turn parts of Iran and Lebanon into Gaza-like wastelands.

Finally, the war has demonstrated that Arab states’ reliance on the US for protection has failed to keep them safe. Having spent trillions of dollars in the past half-century buying sophisticated weapons systems and hosting US bases, many Arab capitals now see little or no return on this investment. They will all have to assess how they can overcome this big void in their capability and sovereignty and how they can recalibrate their defence strategies and diplomatic focus.

All of these dynamics are interlinked, and they all point in the same direction: Palestine. The war in Iran is yet another manifestation of the inherent regional and global instability that the unresolved Israeli-Palestinian conflict has produced for more than 75 years.

Stability and peace will not be achieved until a just solution to the conflict is reached. Until then, Arabs, Iranians and Israelis will continue to live in conflict and fear while people across the world will suffer the rippling effects of the century-old battle between Zionism, Arabism and anticolonial resistance across the Global South – in the many realms that have been clarified in the past two weeks.

Probe ₦5.9bn NNPC Rebranding Cost, SERAP Urges Tinubu

The Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project has called on President Bola Tinubu to order an investigation into the alleged spending of about ₦5.9 billion on the rebranding of the Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation into the Nigerian National Petroleum Company Limited.

In an open letter dated March 14, 2026 and signed by SERAP Deputy Director, Kolawole Oluwadare, the group said there should be full transparency regarding the reported spending.

It asked Tinubu to direct the Attorney General of the Federation and Minister of Justice, Lateef Fagbemi, alongside anti-corruption agencies, to investigate the expenditure.

“SERAP urges you to urgently direct the Attorney General of the Federation and Minister of Justice, Mr Lateef Fagbemi, SAN, and appropriate anti-corruption agencies to promptly investigate the alleged expenditure of about ₦5.9 billion reportedly spent on the rebranding of the Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation to the Nigerian National Petroleum Company Limited,” the letter read.

READ ALSO: Most Nigerians See Govs As Wasteful — SERAP

SERAP also asked the President to mandate the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission and the Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Commission to identify officials who approved the payment and the contractors who received the funds.

“SERAP urges you to direct the EFCC and ICPC to identify the officials who approved and paid the amount, and the contractor(s) who collected the money, and to invite them for questioning,” the group said.

The organisation further urged the anti-corruption agencies to examine the procurement process for the project to determine whether it complied with existing financial regulations and procurement laws.

It added that anyone found responsible for wrongdoing should face prosecution, and any misused public funds should be recovered.

“SERAP urges you to direct Mr Fagbemi and the EFCC and ICPC to ensure that those suspected to be responsible for any wrongdoing are brought to justice if there is sufficient admissible evidence, and that any public funds that may have been misused or mismanaged are recovered and returned to the national treasury,” the letter stated.

According to SERAP, the national oil company reportedly paid ₦2.9bn for incorporation expenses from petroleum product proceeds, while the National Petroleum Investment Management Services also charged ₦2.9bn against crude oil revenue for the same purpose.

“According to reports, about ₦2.9 billion was reportedly charged as incorporation expenses from petroleum product proceeds, while another ₦2.9 billion was charged against crude oil revenue by the National Petroleum Investment Management Services during the transition of the company into a limited liability entity,” the letter added.

SERAP said the combined amount resulted in about ₦5.9bn spent on the rebranding and corporate transition process.

The group argued that investigating the expenditure would help strengthen transparency and accountability in the management of public funds in the petroleum sector.

Keisuke Honda loses US advertising deal over Iran support at World Cup

Former Japanese footballer Keisuke Honda says he has lost an advertising deal in the United States after voicing support for the Iranian national team’s participation in the upcoming FIFA World Cup.

Without naming the sponsor, Honda revealed on Saturday that an advertisement from a US-based company had been “put on hold” after he posted on X that he wants Iran to compete in the tournament cohosted by the US, Mexico and Canada.

Recommended Stories

list of 3 itemsend of list

“I know it’s a very sensitive thing, but I personally want them to participate in the World Cup,” the 39-year-old wrote in a tweet on Thursday, a day after Iran’s sports minister said the country cannot take part in the World Cup after the US and Israel launched a war on it and killed its supreme leader.

Honda, who represented Japan from 2008 to 2018 and scored 38 international goals for his country, posted a follow-up tweet in which he indicated that the advertisement, which had been expected to be finalised in time for the World Cup, had been shelved due to his earlier post.

“Apparently, this statement caused a US company to cancel an advertisement that was about to be finalised to coincide with the World Cup,” he wrote.

“We don’t want anything to do with companies that ignore the essence of things and make decisions based on rotten thinking.”

Iran’s place at the 48-team tournament is in doubt even after they qualified because of the US-Israeli attacks that began on February 28, following which Tehran responded by launching waves of missiles and drones at Israel, several military bases in the Middle East where US forces operate and infrastructure in the region.

The 23rd edition of the FIFA World Cup will be held in the three host nations from June 11 to July 19, and all of Iran’s group games have been scheduled at venues on the US West Coast.

The former Samurai Blue represented his country at the 2010, 2014 and 2018 World Cups and is among the top 10 most capped players and top five goal scorers for the Asian giants.

Honda was named the most valuable player in Japan’s title-winning run at the Asian Cup in 2011. After representing 11 clubs across five continents, the attacking midfielder hung up his boots in 2024 and switched to coaching.

The golden-haired player enjoys a hero-like status in his home country and is one of Japan’s most recognised international footballers.

He expressed his opinion on Team Melli’s participation amid heightened tensions between the host nation US and Iran.

Soccer Football - Keisuke Honda arrives in Rio to join new club Botafogo - Antonio Carlos Jobim International airport, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil - February 7, 2020 Keisuke Honda arrives at the airport and is greeted by Botafogo fans REUTERS/Pilar Olivares
Honda played club football in South America, North America, Europe, Australia and Asia [File: Pilar Olivares/Reuters]

US President Donald Trump said on Thursday that it would not be appropriate for Iran to participate in the World Cup.

“The Iran National Soccer Team is welcome to The World Cup, but I really don’t believe it is appropriate that they be there, for their own life and safety,” Trump wrote in a social media post without elaborating.

The Instagram account for the Iranian national team quickly responded to Trump’s remarks, questioning whether the US president should be commenting on team participation.

“The World Cup is a historic and international event, and its governing body is FIFA – not any individual country,” it wrote.

The account also criticised Trump for failing to provide adequate security for Iran’s national football players.

“Certainly, no one can exclude Iran’s national team from the World Cup,” the message continued. “The only country that could be excluded is one that merely carries the title of ‘host’ yet lacks the ability to provide security for the teams participating in this global event.”

France offers to broker Lebanon-Israel talks: What do we know?

French President Emmanuel Macron has said Paris is ready to mediate a truce between Lebanon and Israel, saying that Lebanese leaders are willing to engage in direct talks in a major shift in the country’s approach towards Israel.

Macron’s statement on Saturday came as Israel continued its attacks, killing more than 800 people in Lebanon and displacing some 800,000. Israel has issued forced evacuation orders for all residents south of the Litani River in southern Lebanon. Reports also suggest that Israeli forces are preparing for a major ground invasion there.

Recommended Stories

list of 3 itemsend of list

Israel launched strikes on Lebanon after the Hezbollah group fired rockets in response to the killing of Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei on March 1, a day after the United States and Israel started the war. Hezbollah had not responded to near-daily attacks carried out by Israel since the November 2024 ceasefire.

Let’s unpack what France has said and what it means.

What’s Macron’s proposal?

Macron said he spoke with Lebanese President Michel Aoun, Prime Minister Nawaf Salam and Speaker Nabih Berri.

“The Lebanese government has indicated its willingness to engage in direct talks with Israel,” he said on X in a message posted in Hebrew, Arabic and French. All segments of the country must be represented, he said, urging Israel to seize the opportunity and start discussion for a ceasefire, “abandon its large-scale offensive and cease its massive airstrikes”. He also called on Hezbollah to halt “its escalating conflict”.

“France is ready to facilitate these discussions by hosting them in Paris,” Macron said. “Everything must be done to prevent Lebanon [from] descending into chaos.”

On Saturday evening, the French Ministry for Europe and Foreign Affairs denied any such plan, saying France is merely open to facilitating and supporting Lebanon in holding direct talks with Israel.

However, a source familiar with the French efforts told Al Jazeera that the plan does exist, but that France is hoping to bring the US on board and fold it into a broader diplomatic push to end the devastating conflict.

Axios cited three sources saying the French officials drafted a proposal that would require the Lebanese government to recognise Israel in exchange for an end to the war.

Israel and Lebanon have been technically at war since 1948, when thousands of Palestinians took refuge in Lebanon. They have since signed armistice and ceasefire agreements, but a final binding peace treaty has eluded them amid Israel’s expansionism.

Hezbollah was created in response to Israel’s 1982 invasion of Lebanon. It has since evolved into one of the most powerful political players in the country, drawing its support mostly among the Shia population.

According to the Axios report, the Lebanese government has accepted the plan as a basis for peace talks. The proposal calls for the deployment of the Lebanese army south of the Litani River, while Israel would pull out from territories it has captured since the start of the current war.

Talks could already start in the “coming days” either in Cyprus or Paris, two sources told the Israeli newspaper Haaretz.

Al Jazeera, however, could not independently confirm the veracity of the media reports.

What has been Israel and Hezbollah’s position on talks?

Lebanese officials’ offer for direct negotiations with Israel is a major concession in a country where ties with Israel, a longtime enemy, are a divisive issue.

It comes as the government has hardened its position against Hezbollah, accusing the group of jeopardising the country’s security. On March 2, the Lebanese prime minister banned Hezbollah’s military activities and restricted its role to the public sphere.

Berri, the parliament speaker who represents the Shia community and is an ally of Hezbollah, has also welcomed the idea of direct talks but said he would negotiate only after Israel stops its attacks on Lebanese territory and displaced people can return to their homes – a position in line with that of the Lebanese group. Israel, on the other hand, has repeatedly said it would not hold its fire until Hezbollah disarms.

A Hezbollah source told Al Jazeera that the group has so far not received an offer for negotiations.

Regardless of the diplomatic initiatives, the reality on the battlefield suggests that neither Hezbollah nor Israel is ready to sit at the negotiating table, said Al Jazeera’s Zeina Khodr. While Israel has imposed air superiority and continues to bomb targets across the country, Hezbollah says it is repelling Israel’s advance in the country’s south.

“What is clear is that the battlefield is still taking shape and neither of the two sides is in a position to impose its conditions for the time being,” Khodr said, reporting from Beirut.

What about past ceasefire deal?

Hezbollah and Israel agreed to a US-backed ceasefire in November 2024 following more than a year of cross-border fighting, including two months of an all-out war in which Israel killed the group’s leader, Hassan Nasrallah. The two sides committed to stop fighting and pull their forces back from south of the Litani to pave the way for the Lebanese army to redeploy in the area.

In practice, however, the deal reduced the intensity of the conflict but never fully stopped it. Israel maintained a presence in at least five positions and continued to carry out military attacks on an almost daily basis.

Hezbollah has refused to lay down arms, which was one of the terms of the 2024 deal. It says it would do so only once Israel fully withdrew from Lebanese territory and stopped its air attacks.

What is the latest on the ground?

The diplomatic efforts come as Israel continues to pound Lebanon, with campaigners pointing out the destruction of residential areas, including health centres. Hezbollah has fired dozens of rockets at Israel.

Israel maintains a sustained bombing campaign targeting the capital, Beirut, as well as other locations across the country. The air raids have forced more than 830,000 people out of their homes – about 14 percent of the country’s population.

Many are struggling to find shelter as aid agencies warn of a humanitarian catastrophe. Israel has also called for the forced evacuation of Beirut’s southern suburbs and parts of the eastern Bekaa Valley.