Critics have scathing reviews of the Duchess of Sussexes’ new lifestyle program just hours after the second season of With Love, Meghan premiered.
Just hours after the release of the second series of Meghan Markle’s lifestyle programme With Love, Meghan, critics have shared their savage reviews of the show, calling it everything from “needy” to “‘narcissistic”.
The anticipated second season of the show was released on Netflix this morning, which follows the widely-panned first season that premiered earlier this year, and sees Meghan share cooking, crafting, and hosting tips with a range of celebrity pals and experts.
In the second instalment, Meghan is joined by guests such as US model and T V personality Chrissy Teigen and Queer Eye star Tan France, as well as podcaster Jay Shetty and his cookbook author wife Radhi Devlukia. While chefs joining Meghan include Clare Smyth, who runs Core, a three-Michelin star restaurant in London, and Jose Andres, who set up the World Central Kitchen.
READ MORE: Prince William’s ‘strategic reason’ for new house move revealed by royal butlerREAD MORE: Meghan Markle makes another brutal swipe at royal life – and reveals actual legal name
Despite the line-up of celebrity figures featuring on the show, critics have shared their scathing reviews of the second series, with The Telegraph giving the lifestyle a two-star rating, panning the season as “marginally less mad but more needy” than its first instalment.
The review went on to call Meghan a “Montecito Marie Antoinette”, and called the series as a whole “boring and at times, pretty insufferable”. The Telegraph’s Anita Singh added that Harry’s absence from the show – despite the programme being based on the couple’s Californian home life – was becoming “increasingly weird ”.
The sentiment was echoed by The Guardian , who dismissed the show as a “gormless lifestyle filler”. The publication also gave the second series a mere two stars, as the review went on to say how Meghan’s show is “so painfully contrived that it’s genuinely fascinating,” before questioning whether “Meghan’s impulse to sprinkle flowers over everything is a choice or a compulsion”.
The Times was equally cutting, branding the eight-part season “a series in search of a meaning, fronted by a woman in need of some cash”. The Times’ Hilary Rose added: “With Love, Meghan is baffling. It occupies the sweet spot where irrelevant meets intolerable. It’s like an advert for somewhere we’ll never go and aren’t invited. It’s an entry for Miss World, not a concept for ten hours of TV.”
The show’s general consensus appears to be that despite the presence of a large number of guests, Meghan comes across as unauthentic despite the breadth of the list.
While the second series of With Love, Meghan appeared to be unapologetically bad, some of the Duchess’ devoted followers online have had opposing opinions of the show, with one user writing on X: “It was such a joy and laughter. Every episode was wonderful.
Meghan’s support was praised by some as being “almost relatably girlie and endearing.” Such a lovely, unassuming, and completely unupbeat soul. Another fan remarked, “You can tell from the inside how much more confident and joyful Meghan is this season.
Meghan also defended her show in an appearance on The Circuit podcast with host Emily Chang when she was asked about the divisive reviews of season one of the show, and how the hate comments landed, as she said: “I think I know who I was trying to meet, so if you know your audience and you know your demographic, well they love the show, and my partners love the show and that’s why we have a season two.”
“So I frequently consider the voices that are saying bad things before secretly returning home and making my single skillet spaghetti,” she said. They might be. Therefore, my goal with the show was to reveal more of myself, offer advice that I value and have fun.
The show comes on the back of Meghan and Prince Harry announcing a new watered-down deal with the streaming giant, in contrast to their reported 100 million dollar (£74million) contract five years ago.
Source: Mirror
Leave a Reply