Meghan and Prince Harry have always vowed to keep their two young children’s privates, but a new report claims that Archie and Lilibet have a plan in place as they age. Experts weigh in on the sudden shift
Little comes before their two children for Meghan and Harry, but what will the young Sussexes’ future hold?
Prince Archie, six, and Princess Lilibet, four, have spent most of their childhoods being kept away from the spotlight, with the Duke and Duchess of Sussex working hard to ensure their privacy. Even when it comes to sharing photographs of the youngsters, the couple often opt to release images that keep their faces out of the shot, a trend that’s become increasingly popular amongst A-listers and celebs in the age of social media, including with other royals like Princess Beatrice.
However, royal fans were delighted in December when the photograph released by Harry and Meghan to mark Christmas gave them a glimpse into just how big Archie and Lilibet are getting on, with the couple sharing a shot that gave more of a look at Archie’s face than normal. Harry was seen beaming down at his son and holding the side of the little boy’s face, who in turn looked up at his father adoringly, with his arms wrapped tightly round the Duke’s waist.
READ MORE: ‘I spoke to Kate Middleton for 90 minutes and realised change is coming’READ MORE: Should Harry and Meghan’s children have official royal roles in the future? Have your say
Body language and communications expert, Judi James, said that the Christmas photo – where Archie was a little more visible than usual – that it could be part of a clever plan by Harry and Meghan to avoid something of a “free-for-all frenzy” of public scrutiny when the children are older.
She explained: “The children are the central point of the idealistic Christmas photo with the pose showing both parents doting on them, but also keeping them visually ‘locked’ in their fairytale-looking world. However, the glimpses here do seem to be a little more open with Archie in particular slightly more visible than usual.”
The expert added: “Perhaps then this is the start of a gradual U-turn to wean the public into more visible glimpses of the children, but without creating any frenzy”.
The communications expert noted that this process would need to be carefully run to prevent the kids from becoming bored later. Harry and Meghan will have created what is known as a “queue trap” for royal and celebrity fans by filming them from backseat and from their constant public references to their obviously beloved two offspring. The peek-a-boo glimpses have fuelled interest and speculation rather than the kind of anonymity that might have occurred if the whole family had moved off to a low-profile life abroad”, she said.
Meghan and Harry made the adorable family photo after changing the name of their charitable foundation to Archewell Philanthropies, a significant professional change. It’s been the couple’s arm for “showing up and doing good” for five years now – but one particular aspect of the statement announcing the new chapter caught attention: a fleeting mention of the Sussex children themselves.
Although it was a brief nod to young Archie and Lilibet, the statement said that “this charitable organization allows the couple and their children to expand upon their global philanthropic endeavors as a family.” It also marked a significant change in how the couple views their family life, which is typically kept very apart from their public image. This “brief but powerful statement,” according to Judi, “sounds like the two worlds of public and private might collide.”
And now fresh reports have claimed that the Sussexes are gearing up to give Archie and Lilibet public roles in then future. A source quoted as one of Harry’s “old friends” is said to be “confused” by the move. They reportedly told the Daily Mail: “Harry and Meghan were always so insistent that their children would be able to make their own way in life without the pressure of expectations or titles. I can’t believe Harry is behind this. It must be Meghan’s influence.” A source disputed to the Mirror the accuracy of the report, saying: “I do not believe this has come from an ‘old friend of the Duke’.” However, they did not comment on the claim that Archie and Lilibet could have public roles when they get older.
Judi James claims Harry and Meghan made a wise decision by including the children in the charity statement. “The fact is their children are growing and will presumably start to have their own opinions about their public profile and visibility, too.
The inclusion of their “efforts” and the Christmas photo may suggest that they are getting ready for that specific moment in advance to avoid any free-for-all frenzy. The images and the quote suggest that their future will still be largely viewed as a family and closely watched and diligently watched by their parents.
Meanwhile, PR to the stars Mayah Riaz told the Mirror that in her view, the brief mention of Archie and Lilibet was a powerful example of” future-proofing “and showed that the couple are focussed on” Legacy over noise, values over visibility. The PR whizz pointed out that this was not a “U-turn” in her opinion when Harry and Meghan attempted to balance their professional lives with parenting, but rather something much more “subtle.”
” I would not see this as a U turn so much as a subtle repositioning, “Mayah explained”. The Sussexes have never really lost their minds about safeguarding the privacy of their children. The way their family story is framed has changed. This is less about putting the children in the public eye and more about future proofing the brand.
“Instead of being meaningful, mentioning the children in the context of Archewell is symbolic. Legacy, continuity, and values are all emphasized. In PR terms, it says this is not a short-term celebrity project but something rooted in family and long-term purpose. This distinction is important because you can discuss your children without explicitly mentioning them.
The statement and photo for Christmas feel carefully crafted. It is warm, aspirational and values led, especially at a time of year when audiences are more receptive to messages about family and togetherness. It views philanthropy as a shared family philosophy rather than merely a professional endeavor. that is successful abroad.
The expert added that the claim that it was “confusing” to bring up the Sussex children in the announcement misses the mark. Mayah clarified that privacy does not imply erasure. The children are not being used as props or visually exposed. They are being made known as a component of the justification. That is a wise decision from the perspective of reputation management.
“If anything, this is about control. They lessen speculation and prevent others from speaking out on their behalf by defining the narrative themselves. A single line does a lot of lifting. It says we are parents, this work matters to us deepl, y and it is bigger than any single news cycle. In essence, it is not a U-turn. It is a muted intention. Legacy over noise, values over visibility”.
Over the past year, the couple has been consistently incorporating their children into their legacy. Meghan has shared photos of sweet family moments on social media, from pumpkin patches to meals shared with her children, as she continues to gain more knowledge about the Sussex family’s idyllic-looking lives in California.
The couple is eager to get their children involved in philanthropy from a young age, just like Harry’s own parents did when he was a child, by taking the kids to a Thanksgiving event at Our Big Kitchen Los Angeles where they helped prepare meals for “neighbours in need” over the holiday weekend.
Source: Mirror
Leave a Reply