After the Traitors star rebuffed her claims that the Can’t Say No singer is the father of her daughter, Conor Maynard threw a brutal jibe at Charlotte Chilton.
Charlotte Chilton has been mocked by Conor Maynard for her ‘fake tears’ after she insisted he was the father of her daughter. Though two tests said the musician was not the father of Charlotte’s baby, she is adamant he is the dad.
A DNA test in March 2025 revealed that Charlotte’s daughter had been born in October of that year. Another study was conducted in August, and the results were the same.
However, Charlotte claimed in a recent interview that Conor is the father and that the results are inaccurate. Conor Maynard is the only person who can be my daughter’s father, she said, “I have researched and researched trying to find the answers.”
“I’ve spoken with experts about the possibility that I could have had twins but lost one very early,” I’ve learned. Then, strange genetics emerge, allowing the twin to have taken a particular DNA sample to prevent her father from appearing on a paternity test. Chimerism refers to it.
After Charlotte’s teary interview was published in a social media post, Conor has since responded. Before he appeared on screen and held a box of tissues, he played a clip of Charlotte crying during the interview.
Before playing a clip of his song with the lyrics “Why you keep on talking baby, won’t you stop talking/Ain’t nobody listening cause you talk too much, please shut up with a cherry on top,” he said, “Here’s an invisible tissue for your invisible tears.”
Along with the post, he simply stated, “My response to the most recent news.” Conor’s supporters included his brother Jack, who called it “absolute cinema.”
Conor previously exclusively told The Mirror how he was still suffering following the scandal. He told us: “I’ve pretty much always poured what I’m going through into my music, the good, the bad, and the ugly. Since this was a pretty intense situation to go through over the last year and a half, it made sense to continue my usual process of putting it into my music.”
He continued, “Of course, many of the lyrics to the song are utterly in jest, but I believe they primarily point out how this entire situation could have been avoided.
“I was always of the opinion that the situation could and ought to have been handled quietly and privately, especially since no evidence existed prior to its reaching the court of public opinion.”
It was not beneficial because it was conducted in full public, but it is now too late to do that; what is done is done. So, in my opinion, the lyric kind of emphasizes that sometimes it’s better to handle situations before shouting them out loud.
Source: Mirror
Leave a Reply