Death toll rises to 36 after India pharmaceutical factory blast, fire

At least 36 people have been confirmed dead after a powerful explosion triggered a fire at a pharmaceutical factory in the southern Indian state of Telangana.

“The condition of the bodies is such that we’ve had to deploy a specialised medical team to carry out DNA tests”, said Health and Medical Cabinet Minister of Telangana Damodar Raja Narasimha on Tuesday.

A government panel has been formed to investigate the cause of the disaster.

The blast, which erupted on Monday afternoon at a facility run by Sigachi Industries, took place in the plant’s spray dryer unit – a section used to convert raw materials into powder for drug manufacturing. The factory is located roughly 50km (31 miles) from Hyderabad, the state capital.

Authorities recovered 34 bodies from the debris, while two more workers succumbed to injuries in hospital, according to Telangana’s fire services director, GV Narayana Rao.

“The entire structure has collapsed. The fire is under control and we’re continuing to clear the rubble in case more people are trapped”, he told the Associated Press news agency.

Twenty-five of the deceased are yet to be identified, a district administrative official, P Pravinya, said.

About 36 workers remain in hospital with burns and other injuries. Police officials said that more than 140 people were working in the plant when the incident occurred.

Local residents reported hearing the blast from several kilometres away.

The incident has raised new concerns about industrial safety in India’s booming pharmaceutical sector. Despite the country’s reputation as a global supplier of low-cost medicines and vaccines, fatal accidents at drug manufacturing units are not rare, particularly in facilities handling chemicals or solvents.

Sigachi Industries, which has its headquarters in India, produces active pharmaceutical ingredients and nutrient blends, and operates manufacturing plants across the country. It also runs subsidiaries in the United Arab Emirates and the United States, according to its website.

Who wins, who loses if Trump’s ‘One Big Beautiful Bill’ passes?

The United States Senate is debating President Donald Trump’s “One Big Beautiful Bill“, which promises sweeping tax breaks, as Republicans hope to pass it before Friday’s Independence Day holiday.

On Saturday, the Senate voted 51-49 to open debate on the latest 940-page version of the bill,  despite two Republican senators joining the Democrats to oppose the motion. Trump’s Republicans hold 53 seats in the Senate, and Democrats hold 47.

What’s next if the Senate passes the bill?

On May 22, the Republican-controlled House of Representatives passed an earlier version of the bill in a 215-214 vote.

That bill has been revised by the Senate, and both chambers of Congress must pass the same legislation for it to become law. If the Senate passes its version, then members from both chambers would work to draft compromise legislation that the House and Senate would have to vote on again. Republicans hold 220 seats and Democrats hold 212 in the House.

If the compromise bill is passed, it would advance to Trump, who is expected to sign it into law.

So, who would be some of the winners and losers if the bill – opposed by Democrats and some conservatives – becomes law?

Who would benefit from the bill?

The groups who would benefit include:

High-income households

The bill would extend tax cuts that Trump introduced during his first term. While Trump has pitched this as a gain for the American people, some will benefit more than others.

More than a third of the total cuts would go to households with an annual income of $460,000 or more. About 57 percent of the tax cuts would go to households with a yearly income of $217,000 or more.

According to an analysis by the nonpartisan Tax Policy Center, the Senate bill would slash taxes on average by about $2,600 per household in 2026. “High-income households would receive much more generous tax benefits”, its analysis said.

Families with children

If the bill does not pass, the child tax credit, currently at $2,000 per child per year, would drop to $1,000 in 2026.

However, if the current version of the Senate bill passes, the child tax credit will permanently increase to $2,200. This is a smaller increase than the $2,500 in the version of the bill that the House approved.

Traditional car manufacturers

Makers of traditional petrol-driven cars could benefit from the bill because the Senate version seeks to end the tax credit for purchases of electric vehicles (EVs), worth up to $7,500, starting on September 30.

This could decrease consumer demand for EVs, levelling the playing field for cars that run on petrol or diesel.

Workers who receive tips

Tips will not be taxed if the bill passes.

Currently, workers – whether waiters or other service providers – are required to report all tips in excess of $20 a month to their employers, and those additional earnings are taxed.

This bill would end that.

Who would lose out because of the bill?

Some of the groups that would not benefit include:

Food stamp recipients

The Senate version of the bill proposes slashing the food stamps programme, called the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), by $68.6bn over a decade, according to an analysis by the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office (CBO).

Food stamps help low-income families buy food. In the 2023 fiscal year, 42.1 million people per month benefited from the programme, according to the US Department of Agriculture.

Medicaid beneficiaries

The Senate version of the bill proposes federal funding cuts by $930bn to Medicaid, the largest US programme providing healthcare to low-income people. These are cuts to budget outlays by 2034.

The bill says that starting in 2026, able-bodied adults under the age of 65 will be required to work 80 hours a month to continue to receive Medicaid, with the exception of those who have dependent children.

More than 71 million low-income Americans were enrolled in Medicaid for health insurance as of March.

EV manufacturers

The EV tax credit would end on September 30 if the Senate version of the bill passes. The House version aims to phase out the tax credit by the end of 2025.

Billionaire Elon Musk, who owns the EV manufacturer Tesla, has voiced his opposition to the bill online. “I’m sorry, but I just can’t stand it anymore. This massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination,” Musk wrote on X on June 3.

He doubled down on his criticism before the Senate deliberations on the bill on Saturday.

“The latest Senate draft bill will destroy millions of jobs in America and cause immense strategic harm to our country,” Musk wrote on X, a platform he owns.

Fiscal conservatives

Some conservatives have criticised the bill, saying it would inflate the country’s enormous debt.

The CBO estimated that the Senate version would raise the national debt by $3.3 trillion from 2025 to 2034. Under the House version, the CBO estimated a $2.4 trillion increase in the debt over a decade.

Iran ‘needs more time’ to decide on resuming nuclear talks with US

After President Donald Trump claimed that US negotiations with Tehran might resume as soon as this week, Iranian Foreign Affairs Minister Abbas Araghchi has ruled out a prompt resumption of talks with the country.

The G7’s foreign ministers issued a statement calling for dialogue on a deal to end Iran’s nuclear program on Monday, following Araghchi’s comments on CBS Evening News.

Israel attacked Iran’s nuclear and military infrastructure while Iran and the US were negotiating about Tehran’s nuclear program. On June 21, the US bombed the Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan sites in an effort to counteract Israel’s attacks.

Tehran insists that its nuclear program is peaceful, but Israel and the US claim to make it impossible for Iran to develop nuclear weapons.

Iran first needs assurances against further attacks, according to Araghchi, who claimed that negotiations won’t begin as soon as Trump had suggested.

The minister said that we must first ensure that America does not target us again during a military attack while we decide to reengage.

He said, “I think we still need more time given all of these considerations,” but that “diplomacy will never shut its doors.”

After his first term, the US president abandoned a 2015 agreement his predecessor signed with Tehran that curbed the nuclear program in exchange for sanctions relief, the Trump administration is pursuing discussions with Iran. Iran was permitted to enrich uranium that was less than 3.67 percent pure for use in commercial nuclear power plants in accordance with that agreement.

Iran responded by producing uranium that was 60% enriched, above the legal threshold for civilian use, but still below the level of a nuclear weapon.

Iran’s nuclear programs would almost certainly not be able to be resurrected, according to Trump, who has claimed that the US attacks have “obliterated” its nuclear sites.

However, Araghchi refrained from making that claim.

He told CBS, “One cannot obliterate science and technology for enrichment through bombings.” We will be able to quickly repair the damage and make up for the lost time if there is a will on our part and a will that exists in order to once again advance in this industry.

Iran has suspended its cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) since the US and Israeli attacks, which came after the ceasefire.

Iranian-based Resul Serdar, a reporter for Al Jazeera, reported that Iran and the IAEA are experiencing growing tensions.

According to Serdar, “They] Iranianians are saying that they will only allow the inspectors to come back once they have secured the nuclear sites” that the US and Israel have bombed.

Meanwhile, Group of Seven foreign ministers praised the ceasefire between Iran and Israel and demanded that Tehran and Washington resume its negotiations.

The G7’s foreign ministers on Monday urged the resumption of negotiations to lead to a comprehensive, verifiable, and long-term agreement that addresses Iran’s nuclear program.