Trump’s ‘Big, Beautiful Bill’ passes Senate: What’s in it, who voted how?

Following extensive negotiations and a marathon vote on amendments, the US Senate narrowly passed President Donald Trump’s massive tax and spending bill on Tuesday.

The bill, which still faces a challenging path to final approval in the House of Representatives, would impose deep cuts to popular health and nutrition programmes, among other measures, while offering $4.5 trillion in tax reductions.

After nearly 48 hours of debate and amendment tussles, the measure was approved.

What information is necessary here:

What is Trump’s ‘ Big, Beautiful Bill’?

The bill combines spending increases on defense and border security, tax cuts, and social safety net reductions into one sweeping package.

The bill’s main objective is to extend Trump’s proposed tax cuts, which are scheduled to expire in 2025. It would make most of these tax breaks permanent, while also boosting spending on border security, the military and energy projects.

Cutting programs in healthcare and food contributes to the bill’s funding.

Trump’s measure, according to the non-partisan Congressional Budget Office, will cause the US debt to rise by $3.3 trillion over the next ten years. The US government currently owes its lenders $36.2 trillion.

The bill’s key components include:

Tax reductions

In 2017, Trump signed the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, which lowered taxes and increased the standard deduction for all taxpayers, but it primarily benefitted higher-income earners.

The new bill would make those tax breaks permanent, but they are scheduled to expire this year. Additionally, it adds some additional costs that he had promised during the campaign.

There is a change to the US tax code called the SALT deduction (State and Local Taxes). This enables taxpayers to include certain state and local taxes (such as income and property taxes) on their federal tax returns.

People can only deduct up to $10,000 of these taxes at the moment. The new bill would raise that cap from $10, 000 to $40, 000 for five years.

Taxpayers would also be able to deduct interest on loans used to purchase US-made cars as well as tips and overtime earned.

About $4.5 trillion in tax cuts are included in the legislation.

Children

If the bill does not become law, the child tax credit – which is now $2, 000 per child each year – will fall to $1, 000, starting in 2026.

The credit would increase to $ 2,200 if the Senate’s most recent version of the legislation were to be approved.

Border wall and security

The bill sets aside about $350bn for Trump’s border and national security plans. Among these are:

  • $46 billion is being spent on the border wall between Mexico and the US.
  • $45bn to fund 100, 000 beds in migrant detention centres
  • In order to carry out Trump’s largest mass deportation effort in US history, he plans to employ an additional 10,000 Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents by 2029.

Medicaid and other programs are being cut.

To help offset the cost of the tax cuts and new spending, Republicans plan to scale back Medicaid and food assistance programmes for low-income families.

They claim that their goal is to redirect these safety net initiatives toward the groups that were intended to be helped, most notably pregnant women, people with disabilities, and children, while also reducing what they refer to as waste and abuse.

The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) and Medicaid assist people in getting groceries while the Medicaid program assists people who are poor and those who have disabilities.

Currently, more than 71 million people depend on Medicaid, and 40 million receive benefits through SNAP. If the bill becomes law, it would leave an additional 11.8 million Americans without health insurance by 2034, according to the Congressional Budget Office.

Tax breaks for clean energy

Republicans are pushing to significantly scale back tax incentives that support clean energy projects powered by renewables like solar and wind. The Inflation Reduction Act, a landmark 2022 law signed by former president Joe Biden that sought to combat climate change and lower healthcare costs, was a key component of the bill.

If the bill is passed in its current form, rather than at the end of 2032, the tax break for those who purchase new or used electric vehicles would expire on September 30th of this year.

Debt limit

The proposed legislation would increase the debt ceiling by $5 trillion, surpassing the $ 4 trillion figure set forth in the House’s May version.

Who benefits the most?

According to Yale University’s Budget Lab, wealthier taxpayers are likely to gain more from this bill than lower-income Americans.

According to them, incomes in the lowest income group will decrease by 2.5 percent, primarily as a result of SNAP and Medicaid cuts, while incomes in the highest earners will increase by 2.2 percent.

Which senators abstained from the bill’s vote?

Republican Senator Susan Collins of Maine opposed due to deep Medicaid cuts affecting low-income families and rural healthcare.

Concerns about Medicaid cuts were raised by Republican Senator Thom Tillis in North Carolina. Trump has threatened to support a Republican challenger to Tillis, so Tillis has made it clear that he won’t run for president again.

Republican Kentucky senator Rand Paul criticized the bill as having “no” because it would significantly worsen the national deficit.

Every member of the Democratic caucus, a total of 47 senators, also voted against the bill.

In the Senate, who was the bill’s supporter?

The remaining Republicans cast a vote in favor, with Vice President JD Vance casting the decisive vote, which saw the bill pass 51–50.

Trump has set a July 4 deadline to pass the bill through Congress, but conceded on Tuesday that it would be “very hard to do” by that date, since the House now needs to vote on it. Due to the Senate’s amendments, the House must revisit the bill after it was passed in May.

Among the notable Senators who backers are:

Senator Lisa Murkowski (representative of Alaska): Her backing was secured after Republicans agreed to Alaska-specific provisions, including delayed nutrition cuts and a new rural health fund, making her vote pivotal.

She told an NBC News reporter, “I have an obligation to the people of the state of Alaska, and I live up to that obligation every day.”

Senators Cynthia Lummis of Wyoming, Ron Johnson of Wisconsin, and Rick Scott of Florida, Mike Lee of Utah, and Ron Johnson of Wisconsin: These fiscally conservative senators shifted from hesitant to support the bill after it was amended.

Senate Majority Leader John Thune led the push to pass the legislation.

What has the public and lawmakers said?

It was hailed as a historic accomplishment by the majority of the Republican lawmakers.

Trump also expressed delight.

After receiving the news from a reporter, Trump said, “Wow, music to my ears.” Because I know this is prime time, he continued, “I was also wondering how we’re doing.

Thune said after the vote: “In the end, we got the job done, and we’re delighted to be able to be partners with President Trump and his agenda”.

Democrats opposed it, calling it a victory for climate change, food aid, and healthcare for the wealthy.

In a floor speech following the vote, Democrat Chuck Schumer said, “Our Republican colleagues will be forever affected by today’s vote.”

“Republicans covered this chamber in shame”, he added.

More than 145 organizations, including the US Chamber of Commerce, led a coalition of more than 145 organizations in favor of the bill, arguing that it would “foster job creation, higher wages, and investor capital investment.”

They applauded funding for border security and permanent tax cuts.

However, healthcare and hospital associations have warned that millions could lose coverage, driving up emergency and unpaid care costs. Environmental advocacy organizations have also voiced strong opposition.

The bill is also losing support among the general public.

“Initially,]Trump] had more than 50 percent of the support. Politicians are aware that under 50%, according to Al Jazeera’s Alan Fisher, a reporter from Washington, DC.

They are aware that Medicaid may be reduced as a result. They are aware, even though Donald Trump had promised to protect it, that this could cut nutritional programmes, particularly for poorer families in the United States.

“And although they will receive tax cuts, they have a lot of the time been persuaded by the Democratic argument that billionaires will do much better than the average American people, and that is what has altered the opinion polls,” he continued.

What follows?

The process begins with the House Rules Committee, which will meet to mark up the bill and decide how debate and consideration will proceed on the House floor.

The House floor will be notified of the rule-passing bill after it passes the Rules Committee for discussion and a vote, possibly on Wednesday morning.

The bill could be changed and sent back to the Senate for another vote if the House of Representatives rejects the Senate’s version.

Alternatively, both chambers could appoint members to a conference committee to work out a compromise.

Qantas says hackers breached system holding data on 6 million customers

According to the flagship airline of Australia, hackers hacked a system that held personal information belonging to 6 million customers, prompting a major cyberattack on Qantas.

After discovering “unusual activity” on a third-party platform on Monday, Qantas said on Wednesday that it took “immediate steps” to secure its systems.

The airline is looking into the amount of data that was stolen, according to a statement from Qantas.

According to the airline, customer names, email addresses, phone numbers, birth dates, frequent flyer numbers, and other sensitive data are included in the affected data, but not credit card information, personal financial information, or passport information.

Qantas informed the police, the Australian Cyber Security Center, and the Office of the Australian Information Commissioner that it had implemented additional security measures.

Vanessa Hudson, the CEO of Qantas Group, apologized to customers for the breach.

“We take the responsibility that our customers have for protecting their personal information seriously,” said Hudson.

“We are contacting our customers right now, and our goal is to give them the support they require.”

Following a string of controversy during the COVID-19 pandemic, including revelations that it sold tickets for thousands of cancelled flights and fought a bid by Qatar Airways to expand its flights to Europe, Qantas is now working to rebuild its reputation.

Qantas moved up 10 spots in the 2025 ranking to earn its lowest-ever spot at Skytrax’s World Airline Awards last year, falling from 17th to 24th place.

Alan Joyce, Hudson’s predecessor, resigned two months before his anticipated retirement in 2023, while acknowledging the airline’s “commitment to advance its renewal as a priority.”

A cybercriminal group known as Scattered Spider had expanded its scope of its targets, according to the FBI in the United States last week.

US university bars trans athletes, erases records under pressure from Trump

Following repression from President Donald Trump’s administration, a top university in the country has agreed to ban transgender athletes from women’s sports and erase records set by a prominent trans swimmer.

Tuesday marked the conclusion of a federal civil rights investigation involving transgender swimmer Lia Thomas and the University of Pennsylvania (UPenn).

Thomas, who was born in the male gender and admitted to being a trans woman in 2018, won the first-ever transgender champion title in 2022.

Thomas, who switched from being a man to a woman in the transition from being a man to a woman, also set UPenn records in five women’s events, including the 100-meter and 500-meter freestyle competitions.

LGBTQ campaigners praised the swimmer’s participation as a victory for inclusion while some of Thomas’s teammates criticized her as an assault on women’s rights, making her accomplishments the center of the debate about fairness in sport.

The university acknowledged that some student athletes had been disadvantaged by the NCAA eligibility requirements that had been in place at the time of Thomas’ participation, according to Larry Jameson, president of UPenn.

Following Trump’s executive order denying funding to educational institutions that allow trans girls and women to compete, the NCAA changed its eligibility requirements in March to only allow female-born athletes to compete in women’s events.

We are aware of this and will make amends to those who have been put at a disadvantage or have anxiety as a result of the policies in place at the time, Jameson said.

We will review and update the Penn women’s swimming records to reflect the current eligibility requirements for those who hold the records.

Thomas was later removed from the “All-Time School Records” section of UPenn’s website on Tuesday, along with a note stating that Thomas set records for the 2021-22 season under “eligibility rules in effect at the time.”

The Education Department’s Office for Civil Rights announced in April that the university had “permitted male athletes to compete in women’s intercollegiate athletics and to occupy women’s only intimate facilities,” making the decision to change.

The agreement, according to US Education Secretary Linda McMahon, was a “great victory for women and girls.”

The Department applauds UPenn for correcting its discriminatory practices against women and girls, and it will continue to fight unabated to reinstate Title IX’s proper application and full application, McMahon said in a statement.

The biggest LGBTQ advocacy groups in the US, GLAAD and Human Rights Campaign, did not respond to requests for comment right away.

The latest in a line of measures to restrict transgender participation in sports since Trump’s January return to the White House is UPenn’s announcement.

World Athletics announced in March that participants in female competitions would have to undergo DNA testing to establish their biological sex.

According to opinion polls, trans women&nbsp and girls competing against female-born athletes are increasingly popular.

Russia-Ukraine war: List of key events, day 1,224

Here is how things stand on Wednesday, July 2:

Fighting

  • A Ukrainian drone attack on an industrial plant in Izhevsk, in central Russia, killed three people and injured 35 others, regional Governor Alexander Brechalov said in a post on Telegram.
  • The drone struck the Kupol Electromechanical Plant, which produces air defence systems and drones for the Russian military, an unnamed official with Ukraine’s Security Service, the SBU, told the Associated Press news agency.
  • A Russian attack on a vehicle evacuating civilians from Pokrovsk, in Ukraine’s Donetsk region, killed one person and injured a policeman, police said.
  • The Ministry of Defence in Moscow said that 60 Ukrainian drones were downed overnight over several regions, including 17 over Russian-occupied Crimea, 16 over Russia’s Rostov region and four over Russia’s Saratov region.
  • Ukraine’s Air Force said on Tuesday that Russia launched 52 Shahed and decoy drones at the country overnight.
  • The United Nations nuclear watchdog, the International Atomic Energy Agency, said on Tuesday that it has been informed of a drone attack last week near Ukraine’s Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Power Plant that damaged several vehicles near the site’s cooling pond.

Weapons

  • Ukrainian Minister of Defence Rustem Umerov announced a new joint weapons production programme with members of the Ukraine Defense Contact Group (UDCG), an alliance of about 50 countries. The programme would offer “a special legal and tax framework” to help establish new factories, “both on Ukrainian territory and abroad”, Umerov said in a post on social media.
  • The Pentagon has reportedly halted some shipments of air defence missiles and other precision munitions to Ukraine over concerns that US stockpiles are too low, the Reuters news agency reported, citing two unnamed sources. The Pentagon did not immediately comment on the report.
  • A Russian-British dual national appeared in a London court on Tuesday, charged with sending cryptocurrency for pro-Russian separatist militias in eastern Ukraine to buy weapons and military equipment.

Politics and diplomacy

  • French President Emmanuel Macron called for a ceasefire in Ukraine in his first call with Russian President Vladimir Putin since 2022.
  • A Kremlin statement said that Putin reminded Macron that “the Ukrainian conflict is a direct consequence of the policy of Western states”.
  • Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov told reporters that “no one is delaying anything here”, after US envoy Keith Kellogg accused Russia of “stall[ing] for time” on ceasefire talks, “while it bombs civilian targets in Ukraine”.
  • Peskov added: “We are naturally in favour of achieving the goals that we are trying to achieve through the special military operation via political and diplomatic means. Therefore, we are not interested in drawing out anything. ”

Two Chinese nationals charged for trying to recruit spies in US military

The United States Department of Justice has charged two Chinese citizens for spying and trying to recruit from within the country’s military ranks.

According to Tuesday’s statement, Yuance Chen, 38, and Liren “Ryan” Lai, 39, are accused of working on behalf of China’s foreign intelligence arm, the Ministry of State Security (MSS).

The pair allegedly carried out a range of “clandestine intelligence taskings”, including facilitating payments in exchange for national security information, gathering intelligence on Navy bases and attempting to recruit MSS assets.

“This case underscores the Chinese government’s sustained and aggressive effort to infiltrate our military and undermine our national security from within,” said Attorney General Pamela Bondi.

According to an affidavit from the FBI, Lai was part of an MSS network “who could travel more easily” between China and the US “to facilitate clandestine operations”.

Starting around 2021, he began developing Chen, who is a legal permanent resident, into his asset.

After ascertaining that Chen knew people in the US military, Lai urged him to travel abroad to discuss his connections in person, even offering to pay for the tickets, according to the affidavit.

The men reportedly met with MSS agents, and in 2022, they left a backpack with $10,000 in cash in a California locker as payment to other individuals for intelligence gathering.

In the years that followed, the affidavit says that Chen collected information about the Navy and sent it to Lai, while also discussing recruitment efforts directly with the MSS.

Some of that information included personal details from Navy employees. In one case, Chen travelled to San Diego, California, to meet with a Navy hire and tour the USS Abraham Lincoln, an aircraft carrier.

Photos included in the affidavit show a visitor’s badge as well as Chen posing with the employee and their child on top of the aircraft carrier’s deck.

The FBI says that such interactions are part of China’s campaign to extend its military’s reach.

“The PRC [People’s Republic of China] government seeks blue-water naval capabilities as part of their effort to modernize their navy and establish hegemony in the South China Sea,” the affidavit reads.

“Blue-water capabilities” generally refer to long-distance maritime efforts, as opposed to operations based closer to domestic shores.

“As such, the PRC government tasks and deploys the MSS to surreptitiously target the US Navy and collect intelligence,” the affidavit continues.

Both men were charged under the Foreign Agent Registration Act, or FARA, which requires that those working on behalf of another country register with the US government.

In recent years, the US government has ramped up its use of the law in its effort to combat alleged Chinese espionage activity.

Beijing typically denies such claims and has accused the US of discriminatory tactics.

“These charges reflect the breadth of the efforts by our foreign adversaries to target the United States,” US Attorney Craig H Missakian said in the Justice Department statement.

US Senate passes Trump’s ‘One Big Beautiful Bill’, sending it to the House

The United States Senate has passed a sweeping tax bill championed by President Donald Trump, sending the controversial legislation to the House of Representatives for what could be a final vote.

Lawmakers passed the bill by a 51-to-50 vote in the Republican controlled-chamber on Tuesday, after Vice President JD Vance broke the tie.

The successful vote ended what was  a marathon 27 hours of debate in the upper chamber. Three Republicans joined with Democrats to vote against the bill, which would enshrine many of Trump’s signature policies, including his 2017 tax cuts, reductions for social safety net programmes, and increased spending on border enforcement and deportations.

Critics on both sides of the aisle have taken aim at the estimated $3. 3 trillion the bill would add to the national debt.

Others have blasted reductions to programmes like Medicaid and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP). They argue that the bill takes support away from low-income families to finance tax cuts that will primarily help the wealthy.

Trump, however, has pressed for the bill to be passed by July 4, the country’s Independence Day. The legislation, informally known as the “One Big Beautiful Bill”, now heads back to the House for a Wednesday vote on the updated version.

The president found out about the Senate’s passage in the midst of a news conference in South Florida, where he was touting his crackdown on immigration.

Despite tight odds in the House, Trump struck an optimistic tone about the upcoming vote.

“I think it’s going to go very nicely in the House,” Trump said. “Actually, I think it will be easier in the House than it was in the Senate. ”

The president also downplayed one of the most controversial provisions in the bill: cuts to Medicaid, a government health insurance programme for low-income families. About 11. 8 million people are anticipated to lose their health coverage in the coming years if the bill becomes law.

“I’m saying it’s going to be a very much smaller number than that, and that number will be all waste, fraud and abuse,” Trump said.

Criticisms in the Senate

Trump was not the only Republican to be celebrating the passage of the omnibus bill. In the Senate, leading Republican John Thune touted the bill as a victory for US workers.

“It’s been a long road to get to today,” Thune said from the Senate floor. “Now we’re here, permanently extending tax relief for hard-working Americans. ”

But not all Republicans were as enthused about the bill. Three party members – Thom Tillis of North Carolina, Rand Paul of Kentucky and Susan Collins of Maine – all voted against its passage. And even a critical vote in favour, Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, appeared to express regret in the aftermath.

“Do I like this bill? No,” she told a reporter for NBC News. “I know that in many parts of the country, there are Americans who are not going to be advantaged by this bill. I don’t like that. ”

She later took to social media to criticise the haste of its passage. “Let’s not kid ourselves. This has been an awful process – a frantic rush to meet an artificial deadline that has tested every limit of this institution. ”

Meanwhile, the top Democrat in the Senate, Chuck Schumer, said that Republicans had “betrayed the American people and covered the Senate in utter shame”.

“In one fell swoop, Republicans passed the biggest tax break for billionaires ever seen, paid for by ripping away healthcare from millions of people,” said Schumer.

Still, Schumer announced one symbolic victory on Tuesday, writing on the social media platform X that Trump’s name for the legislation, “One Big Beautiful Bill”, had been struck from its official title.

Republicans currently hold a trifecta in the US government, with control of the Senate, the House and the White House, giving Democrats reduced power in legislating.

But the Republicans have narrow majorities in Congress, leading to uncertainty about the bill’s fate. In the Senate, they hold 53 of the chamber’s 100 seats. In the House, where the bill heads now, they have a majority of 220 representatives to the Democrats’ 212.

‘Not fiscal responsibility’

The bill is therefore likely to face a razor-thin margin in the House. An early version that passed on May 22 did so with just one Republican vote to spare.

The House Freedom Caucus, a group of hardline conservatives, has continued to baulk at the bill’s high price tag and could push for deeper spending cuts in the coming days.

“The Senate’s version adds $651 billion to the deficit – and that’s before interest costs, which nearly double the total,” the caucus wrote in a statement on Monday.

“That’s not fiscal responsibility. It’s not what we agreed to. ”

Billionaire Elon Musk, whose endorsement and funding helped propel Trump to victory in the 2024 presidential election, has also been a vocal opponent of the bill.

“What’s the point of a debt ceiling if we keep raising it? ” Musk asked on social media on Tuesday. “All I’m asking is that we don’t bankrupt America. ”

Musk has threatened to fund primary challenges against Republicans who support the bill and even floated on Monday launching a new political party in the US.

Trump, however, has brushed aside Musk’s criticism as a reaction to the elimination of tax credits for electric vehicles: The billionaire owns one of the most prominent manufacturers, Tesla.

The president also threatened to use the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), which Musk helped to found, to strip the billionaire’s companies of their subsidies.

“DOGE is the monster that might have to go back and eat Elon,” Trump said as he travelled to Florida.

Reporting from Washington, DC, Al Jazeera correspondent Alan Fisher said that public support has been slipping as a clearer picture of the bill has emerged.

“The longer this has been talked about and the more details that become public, the fewer Americans support him,” Fisher said.

Several recent polls have shown that a majority of Americans oppose the bill. In a survey last week from Quinnipiac University, for example, just 29 percent of respondents were in favour of the legislation, while 55 percent were against it.

Increase to national debt

All told, the legislation in its current form would make permanent Trump’s 2017 cuts to business and personal income taxes, which are set to expire by the end of the year.

It would also give new tax breaks for income earned through tips and overtime, a policy promise Trump made during his 2024 campaign.

At the same time, the bill would provide tens of billions of dollars for Trump’s immigration crackdown, including funding to extend barriers and increase technology along the southern border. The bill would also pay for more immigration agents and build the government’s capacity to quickly detain and deport people.

Beyond cuts to electric vehicle tax breaks, the bill also guts several of former President Joe Biden’s incentives for wind and solar energy.

Faced with criticism about the knock-on effects for low-income families, Republicans have countered that the new restrictions on Medicaid and SNAP, formerly known as food stamps, would help put the programmes on a more sustainable path.

Many Republicans have also rejected the Congressional Budget Office’s assessment that the legislation would add $3. 3 trillion to the country’s already $36. 2 trillion debt.