Mexico sends 37 more drug cartel suspects to US amid Trump attack threats

According to Mexico’s security minister, the country has received 37 more alleged Mexican members as a result of US President Donald Trump’s threat of ground attacks against drug cartels in the area.

The total number of suspects transferred to the US has increased to 92 with the handover of alleged drug cartel members on Tuesday, marking their third significant transfer in the previous year.

Recommended Stories

list of 3 itemsend of list

As several armored vehicles, presumably carrying the suspects, arrived, accompanied by rows of fully-armed Mexican security personnel lined up next to a plane, according to images posted by Mexican Security Minister Omar Garcia Harfuch on X.

92 high-impact criminals have been transferred to the US under this administration, preventing them from provoking violence in our nation, according to Harfuch on X.

According to the minister, seven Mexican Armed Forces aircraft transported the suspects to Washington, Houston, New York, Pennsylvania, San Antonio, and San Diego.

The most recent swap took place as a result of President Trump’s repeated threats to attack cartels within Mexico’s borders with or without the Mexican government’s approval, which are causing an increase in tension with Washington.

According to Mexico’s military, those who were transferred by the US on Tuesday were wanted because of their alleged connections to organized crime and risked public safety.

The political and legal justifications for the government’s prisoner transfers to the US have been contested by Mexican lawmakers and legal experts.

According to security minister Harfuch, transfers were made “in accordance with Mexico’s National Security Law and in accordance with bilateral cooperation arrangements with the US, with full respect for national sovereignty.” Additionally, he claimed that Mexico had received assurances from the US that the suspects would not face the death penalty if found guilty.

Pedro Inzunza Noriega, the father of Mexico’s powerful Beltran Leyva cartel, was one of the people who was recently transferred to the US. He was detained in December 2025 after being named in the US’s first terrorism indictment against a Mexican drug trafficker.

Trump has put more pressure on Mexico over drug cartels, and he has said land attacks against trafficking networks will follow recent US attacks on ships in the Pacific and the Caribbean region, which have caused more than 110 fatalities since September.

US trade with Southeast Asia and Taiwan surging despite Trump tariffs

In 2024, when Donald Trump took office, he promised to reduce the nation’s trade deficit, which had increased by about $ 918.4 billion, or 3.1 percent of GDP.

Beginning on April 2, he invoked the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), which he called “reciprocal tariffs” on US trade partners to “correct trade practices” that the White House attributed to the hollowing out of US manufacturing.

Recommended Stories

list of 4 itemsend of list

However, preliminary trade data indicate that while Trump intended, the US trade deficit overall decreased in 2025. However, the tariffs did not have the desired impact in Southeast and East Asia. The tariffs have simply rearranged supply chains in an effort to lessen US dependence on the two regions, both of which are major manufacturing centers.

According to Deborah Elms, head of trade policy at the Hinrich Foundation in Singapore, “If you squeeze a balloon in one direction and people still want the product, they will get the product, whatever it is, from a different location.”

She told Al Jazeera, “Trade moves to places where there are trade opportunities.” “We have changed the way we conduct trade, but we haven’t ended it.”

US exports to China decreased

China, the largest exporter to the US, was one of Trump’s top targets.

According to the US-based Peterson Institute for International Economics, the average US duty on Chinese goods as of November 2025 came after months of tit-for-tariffs imposed by Washington and Beijing.

Following a upcoming meeting between Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping, which is scheduled for April, the final duties may change. Trade has already drastically decreased as a result.

According to Chinese customs data, the value of Chinese exports to the US decreased by 20% in the wake of the upheaval in 2025.

According to the US Census Bureau, the trade deficit for goods also dramatically decreased. Using US Census data, imported goods from China decreased from $438.7 billion in 2024 to $ 266.3 billion in 2025.

According to the same data, the overall US trade deficit for goods decreased from $ 245.5 billion in 2024 to $ 175.4 billion in 2025. &nbsp,

Southeast Asia, whose manufacturers make up the “Chinese Plus One” supply chain, is a different story from US trade data.

Gain for Southeast Asia

Trump’s “Liberation Day” tariffs targeted the region particularly, with preliminary duties set at 17 to 49 percent for Vietnam, Indonesia, Malaysia, Philippines, Thailand, and Vietnam. Through bilateral trade agreements that provided some sector-specific exemptions, tariffs were later agreed upon to 19 to 20%.

They are lower than the US tariffs on China, though they are higher than before.

According to census data, the US trade in goods with Thailand, Indonesia, and the Philippines all increased in 2025 despite these nations experiencing “reciprocal tariff” rates of 19%. The US trade deficit for goods increased from a relatively small $4.9 billion to $ 6.8 billion, increasing by 11 percent with Indonesia, 23 percent with Thailand, and an astonishing 38 percent with the Philippines.

Despite having tariffs of 19%, trade with Cambodia and Malaysia continued to be stable between 2024 and 2025, according to census data.

Despite a 20% tariff, the most significant change in the dollar amount in Southeast Asia was seen in Vietnam, where the US trade deficit for goods increased by more than $20 billion from $ 123.4 billion in 2024 to $ 145.7 billion in 2025, according to the same data.

Does China simply reroute its products?

China’s supply chains continue to move, according to Zichun Huang, a China economist at the United Kingdom’s Capital Economics, who explained this shift to Al Jazeera. Some of this can be attributed to the transshipment of goods through Southeast Asia.

“Rerouting of exports to the US via neighboring countries has a function. However, she claimed in an email that this has not been the main driver.

Instead of using the acronym Association of Southeast Asian Nations, ASEAN is importing more machinery and intermediate goods from China, which are being used to produce exports to the US.

China’s record $ 1.19 trillion global trade surplus, announced last week by Beijing’s General Administration of Customs, shows that the country’s exporters are expanding beyond the US.

According to Nick Marro, principal economist for Asia at the Economist Intelligence Unit, the White House threatened to impose a 40% tariff on “transshipments,” but the term has since become more difficult to define as supply chains spread across Southeast Asia and goods are frequently transgressed throughout the manufacturing process.

He told Al Jazeera, “The difficulty in defining a transshipment is probably one reason why the US hasn’t seen any progress in this,” he said. He claimed that the US is distracted by global concerns about trade and foreign policy at the same time.

AI is a key driver of Taiwan’s trade booms.

Following Tehran’s crackdown on widespread anti-government protests, Trump has threatened to impose new tariffs on European nations that oppose US policies in Greenland as well as on those that continue to conduct business with Iran.

According to experts like Elms, Trump has also shown that he can have competing and even contradictory goals for the US economy. The US president may want to reduce the country’s trade deficit, but he also wants to encourage the US-based economy and the growth of AI.

Nowhere is this crystal clearer than in Trump’s dealings with Taiwan, which the US president has previously claimed he stole from the country’s chip industry.

According to US government data, trade with Taiwan is flourishing despite the decline in other East Asian markets. Due to tariff carveouts for Taiwan’s semiconductors and derivative parts, the US deficit with Taiwan increased by more than 50% from $ 73.7 billion in 2024 to $ 111.8 billion in 2025.

According to Kristy Tsun-Tzu Hsu, director of the Taiwan ASEAN Studies Center at the Chung-Hua Institution for Economic Research in Taipei, Trump’s “reciprocal tariffs” on Taiwanese goods, which were agreed last week as 15%, only affected about 30% of exports.

However, she told Al Jazeera, many observers were caught off guard by the surge in exports.

Because Taiwan and other nations anticipated weak exports last year, but because of this inventory [stockpiling] and the AI boom, there is a very high demand for semiconductors, according to the author. “This is very different from what everyone expected.”

Hsu claimed that the rise in imports from Vietnam, which has risen through the ranks to become one of the top US chip suppliers, was a product of the same demand. She anticipated that the increase would continue into 2026 in both cases.

Despite the growing US trade deficit, Elms predicted that Trump would not make any moves against Taiwan regarding the chip issue.

She expressed her desire for the US president to “reduce the trade deficits.”

Trump, however, added that AI-driven stock market boom is a Trump supporter.

If you asked Trump, would you prefer a lower trade deficit to a higher-exploited stock market, in your opinion? She said, “He would always vote for the stock market.”

What comes next?

Given that Trump’s “reciprocal tariffs” are up for legal challenge, the US Supreme Court may decide whether or not they will. Even if the court rejects the tariffs, experts claim it could still take months, if not years, to unwind.

As the US midterm elections in November, Priyanka Kishore, director and principal economist at Asia Decoded in Singapore, warned Al Jazeera that Trump’s support for tariffs could be undermined by the country’s rising prices.

Nigerian police confirm gunmen abducted villagers, after initial denials

After initially dismissing the incident, police in Kaduna State, Nigeria, reported that armed bandits had abducted dozens of villagers over the weekend.

Nigeria’s national police spokesman, Benjamin Hundeyin, claimed an “abduction” had actually occurred on Sunday and that security operations had been launched with a “clear focus on locating and safely rescuing the victims and restoring calm to the area.”

Recommended Stories

list of 3 itemsend of list

Hundeyin claimed that the earlier denials made no mention of the fact that the facts were still being verified. How many people were abducted, according to the police statement.

Usman Danlami Stingo, a state lawmaker from Kaduna State, quoted a number of missing people as saying 168 in an interview with The Associated Press.

Reverend John Hayab, the head of the Christian Association of Nigeria in the country’s northern region, confirmed to the Reuters news agency on Monday that at least 172 worshippers had been abducted and that nine others later made off, leaving 163 people still missing.

The latest in a string of widespread kidnappings in Nigeria that target both Christians and Muslims is on Sunday.

In the northern and central regions of Nigeria’s most populous nation, gangs, known as “bandits,” frequently carry out mass kidnappings for ransom and loot villages.

According to Al Jazeera’s Ahmed Idris, who was reporting from Kurmin Wali, Kaduna State, gunmen stormed the village on Sunday as people gathered to pray in three churches and kidnapped a quarter of the village’s residents.

The community received a demand two days after the attack, according to Idris.

“The bandits want the return of ten abandoned motorcycles.” That is currently required for the captors’ release. Residents of Kurmin Wali claim they are unaware of where the bikes are and that many of them have been robbed, making it difficult for them to feed themselves.

More than 300 Catholic students and teachers were sequestered by armed gangs in the Niger State in November, with the majority of the students fleeing and the rest being released in batches weeks later.

Nigeria’s conflict areas are roughly evenly divided between a predominantly Christian south and a Muslim-majority north, according to experts, which kill both Christians and Muslims frequently without distinction.

However, Donald Trump, the president of the United States, has focused on the security situation in Nigeria and put pressure on Abuja by putting pressure on the country’s leaders.

The US launched strikes in northwestern Sokoto State in late December against what it and the Nigerian government claimed were armed organizations.

US Justice Department probes Minnesota officials amid migration raids

A group of state officials, including governors of Minnesota and mayors of Minneapolis and Minnesota’s mayor, claim to be the subject of an investigation by the US Department of Justice (DOJ) after filing a lawsuit against the government for its controversial immigration raids.

Federal immigration officers were allegedly obstructing justice by preventing them from performing their duties, according to a report from US broadcaster CBS News late on Tuesday.

Recommended Stories

list of 4 itemsend of list

The investigation is the most recent development in a series of heated exchanges between Minnesota officials and President Donald Trump’s administration over immigration raids, including the one that involved an ICE agent fatally shooting Renee Good, a mother of three and a US citizen.

Governor Walz referred to the DOJ investigation as “political theater” in a statement released on Tuesday.

In response to calls for justice in the wake of Renee Good’s murder, violence, and chaos, the Justice Department investigation is directed at justice. He claimed that it is a partisan distraction.

Attorney General Ellison claimed in a post on X that the Justice Department had subpoenaed “records and documents related to my office’s work with respect to federal immigration enforcement, not for me personally.”

Given that the order came so soon after the state sued the Department of Homeland Security, which regulates ICE and Customs and Border Protection (CBP), Ellison described the action as “highly irregular.”

Ellison wrote on X that Trump’s DOJ is more focused on investigating my office than Renee Good’s death.

He declared, “I will not be intimidated, and I will continue to work to defend Minnesotans from this revenge campaign.”

Ellison’s office described the ICE raids as “dangerous, illegal, and unconstitutional stops and arrests, all conducted under the guise of lawful immigration enforcement” in a statement released last week.

Mayor of Minneapolis Frey characterized the DOJ investigation as an attempt to avert state officials.

According to The Associated Press news agency, Frey’s office previously made available a copy of the Justice Department subpoena, which requests “any records tending to show a refusal to assist immigration officials.”

A grand jury will examine the documents on February 3 to determine whether the lawsuit has any probable cause.

In December, the Department of Homeland Security launched an enormous immigration operation to dispatch thousands of ICE and CBP agents to the Democratic-led cities of Minneapolis and St Paul in Minnesota.

In early January, an ICE officer shot and killed Good, 37, who was observing an immigration raid as a citizen observer, in the country. Despite widespread public outcry across the nation, the DOJ has since decided not to investigate the shooting.

Ex-Japanese Prime Minister Abe’s killer sentenced to life

BREAKING,

What is Bangladesh’s Jamaat-e-Islami party? Could it lead the country next?

Abdur Razzak, a 45-year-old banker in Bangladesh’s Faridpur district, believes the political party he supports has a real chance of taking over as the head of a ruling alliance for the first time in his life.

Campaigning for the Jamaat-e-Islami party’s “scales” symbol in his town, Razzak said people he was meeting with were “united in voting” for Jamaat, as the Islamist party is commonly referred to in the world’s eighth-most populous country, home to the fourth-largest Muslim population on the planet.

Recommended Stories

list of 4 itemsend of list

Bangladesh is scheduled to hold a general election on February 12, the first vote since a student-led uprising toppled longtime former Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina’s government in August 2024.

She was replaced by Hasina’s interim government, which was led by Nobel Peace Prize laureate Muhammad Yunus. The upcoming election will feature a bipolar contest between the Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP) and an alliance formed by the Jamaat and the National Citizen Party (NCP), a group formed by student leaders of the 2024 uprising along with other Islamist parties.

Razzak’s confidence is fuelled by recent opinion polls that suggest the Jamaat is closing in on the BNP, its senior coalition partner for decades.

The BNP received 33 percent of the vote in a December survey conducted by the American-based International Republican Institute, with Jamaat coming in close at 29 percent. The BNP topped out at 34.7 percent and Jamaat at 33.6 percent, according to a new poll conducted by leading Bangladeshi organizations last week, including NarratiV, Projection BD, the International Institute of Law and Diplomacy (IILD), and the Jagoron Foundation.

If the Jamaat-led alliance is able to emerge victorious, it will be a dramatic turnaround for a party that was subjected to a brutal crackdown during Hasina’s 15-year government. In response to Hasina, Jamaat was banned, its top leaders were hanged or imprisoned, and thousands of members were forced to go missing or be taken into custody.

The International Crimes Tribunal, a contentious court that Hasina founded in 2010, was established to prosecute suspects for allegedly playing a role in crimes committed during Bangladesh’s declaration of independence from Pakistan in 1971.

Ironically, the same tribunal in November sentenced 78-year-old Hasina to death for ordering a crackdown on the 2024 protesters, killing more than 1, 400 of them. Hasina, her close ally, fled to India after the uprising, where she is now. New Delhi has so far turned down Hasina’s request to give her to the Yunus administration in spite of numerous appeals.

Resurgence after decades of repression

Jamaat backed Pakistan during the conflict in 1971, which is still controversial in Bangladesh today. The Islamist party has since become more assertive following Hasina’s escape from India during the uprising and the release of key Jamaat leaders.

“Our leaders and activists suffered throughout the Hasina years. Many of our leaders were put to death. Our political rights were violated, according to Razzak, who refers to Jamaat’s student wing, Islami Chhatra Shibir.

“Now, things have changed. People understand what we experienced, and they think we’re trustworthy. They will vote for us because of this, he said.

Founded by Islamist thinker Syed Abul Ala Maududi in 1941, during the British rule on the Indian subcontinent, the Jamaat evolved from a trans-regional Islamist movement into a distinct political force in Bangladesh.

The organization argued that a decision to secede from Pakistan would stifle Muslim political unity and alter South Asia’s power balance. Senior Jamaat figures sided with the Pakistani government in the conflict of 1971, and they even founded paramilitary organizations that demanded independence from Bangladesh.

Shortly after independence, the government of Sheikh Mujibur Rahman – Hasina’s father – banned Jamaat in 1972, until BNP founder Ziaur Rahman lifted the ban in 1979, when he was president. Jamaat gained a significant political standing over the following 20 years. In 1991, when Rahman’s wife Khaleda Zia became the first woman to serve as prime minister, it backed the BNP-led coalition.

It was during Khaleda’s government that the citizenship of prominent Jamaat leader Ghulam Azam, revoked after independence, was reinstated, giving the party a major boost. Jamaat formally joined the BNP-led coalition under Khaleda in 2001, and he also held two cabinet positions.

Hasina’s reign of setbacks came as a result of her government’s decision to order war crimes trials against senior Jamaat leaders at the International Crimes Tribunal, which her government established. Despite rights groups saying the tribunal’s proceedings violated due process, several Jamaat leaders, including former party chief Motiur Rahman Nizami and former Secretary-General Ali Ahsan Mohammad Mojaheed, were hanged.

The Jamaat leadership was destroyed by the crackdown, leaving the organization politically isolated for 15 years.

Since the uprising in 2024 and the lifting of the ban on it, Jamaat, which is currently led by chief Shafiqur Rahman, deputy chief Syed Abdullah Mohammed Taher, and secretary-general Mia Golam Porwar, has reorganized into a strong contender for the upcoming election.

Party leaders say the revival reflects not only public sympathy after years of repression, but a broader disillusionment with the country’s established political order.

Bangladesh has primarily been ruled by the Awami League and the BNP over the past 55 years, according to Jamaat deputy chief Taher. Many people are frustrated, and people have long experience with both. They want a new political force to govern”.

Jamaat quickly established itself as the BNP’s main challenger in the political vacuum created by the ban on Hasina’s Awami League. The recent student union elections, in which Jamaat’s student wing, Islami Chhatra Shibir, won important campus victories, have rekindled that momentum.

Taher told Al Jazeera that Jamaat has an estimated 20 million supporters, roughly 250, 000 of whom are registered members, known as “rukon”, including women. A young political party like the NCP wants to capitalize on the organizational strength of the party in the upcoming election.

Taher cited Jamaat’s appeal throughout Bangladesh as evidence of its resilience despite decades of political marginalization. The “public interest in the Jamaat” is “growing”, he added.

We think we can win a majority if this trend persists.

Concerns about the Islamist Party’s rise

Jamaat’s resurgence has also prompted debate over whether Bangladesh is prepared to be led by an Islamist force, which some fear could seek to enforce Sharia law or try to restrict women’s rights and freedoms.

However, Jamaat leaders refute these fears and promise to implement a reform agenda under the country’s secular constitution.

“We will accept and carry out agreed reforms when we come to power.” Where new laws are needed – for example, to ensure good governance and eliminate corruption – we will examine them at that time”, Taher said.

He also criticized Jamaat for imposing a “conservative” label, describing his party as a “moderate Islamist force” that seeks to rule through constitutional changes rather than ideological enforcement.

He claimed that the party’s alliance with the NCP, which was founded by 2024 uprising leaders, and with the Liberal Democratic Party, which was led by war hero Oli Ahmad, was a “unification of the spirit of 1971” with the movement’s 2024 roots, and was a result of a generational shift rather than ideological hard lines.

Jamaat is also seeking to broaden its appeal beyond its Muslim base. Krishna Nandi, a Hindu candidate from the city of Khulna, is a candidate for the party for the first time in its history because it has highlighted minority rights in an effort to draw in non-Muslim voters, who make up about 10% of Bangladesh’s majority-Hindu population.

While many Bangladeshis may be more religious than they were in the past, according to Asif Bin Ali, a geopolitical analyst and doctoral fellow at Georgia State University in the US, they are also “politically pragmatic, despite personal piety,” and prefer politicians to clerics.

“A sizeable part of the Bangladeshi society is moving in a more Islamist direction, but that is not the same as being ready to hand the state to a conservative Islamist leadership”, Ali told Al Jazeera.

The state would not be attempted along strictly Islamist lines because the center-left and center-right space are still significant.

The best chance for voters to land in Jamaat would be in using its Islamist identity, according to Thomas Kean, senior consultant for Bangladesh and Myanmar at the International Crisis Group. This would help voters dissatisfy voters who are dissatisfied with the BNP and Awami League.

At the same time, Kean cautioned that Jamaat’s past and some of its policy positions – particularly those related to its Islamist ideology – continue to deter many voters.

He predicted that Jamaat is on track to deliver its best-ever results in the upcoming election. I have a doubt about Jamaat’s chances of winning, though. We are talking about a party that has never won even 20 seats previously, or much more than 12 percent of the popular vote”.

Will the NCP-alliant alliance succeed?

Jamaat’s resurgence has also prompted debate over whether Bangladesh is prepared to be led by an Islamist force, which some fear could seek to enforce Sharia law or try to restrict women’s rights and freedoms.

However, Jamaat leaders refute these fears and promise to implement a reform agenda under the country’s secular constitution.

“We will accept and carry out agreed reforms when we come to power.” Where new laws are needed – for example, to ensure good governance and eliminate corruption – we will examine them at that time”, Taher said.

He also criticized Jamaat for imposing a “conservative” label, describing his party as a “moderate Islamist force” that seeks to rule through constitutional changes rather than ideological enforcement.

He claimed that the party’s alliance with the NCP, which was founded by 2024 uprising leaders, and with the Liberal Democratic Party, which was led by war hero Oli Ahmad, was a “unification of the spirit of 1971” with the movement’s 2024 roots, and was a result of a generational shift rather than ideological hard lines.

Jamaat is also seeking to broaden its appeal beyond its Muslim base. Krishna Nandi, a Hindu candidate from the city of Khulna, is a candidate for the party for the first time in its history because it has highlighted minority rights in an effort to draw in non-Muslim voters, who make up about 10% of Bangladesh’s majority-Hindu population.

While many Bangladeshis may be more religious than they were in the past, according to Asif Bin Ali, a geopolitical analyst and doctoral fellow at Georgia State University in the US, they are also “politically pragmatic, despite personal piety,” and prefer politicians to clerics.

“A sizeable part of the Bangladeshi society is moving in a more Islamist direction, but that is not the same as being ready to hand the state to a conservative Islamist leadership”, Ali told Al Jazeera.

The state would not be attempted along strictly Islamist lines because the center-left and center-right space are still significant.

The best chance for voters to land in Jamaat would be in using its Islamist identity, according to Thomas Kean, senior consultant for Bangladesh and Myanmar at the International Crisis Group. This would help voters dissatisfy voters who are dissatisfied with the BNP and Awami League.

At the same time, Kean cautioned that Jamaat’s past and some of its policy positions – particularly those related to its Islamist ideology – continue to deter many voters.

He predicted that Jamaat is on track to deliver its best-ever results in the upcoming election. I have a doubt about Jamaat’s chances of winning, though. We are talking about a party that has never won even 20 seats previously, or much more than 12 percent of the popular vote”.

Litmus test for ties to other countries

It is for these reasons that the forthcoming election – and how the Jamaat performs – could also prove to be a litmus test for Bangladesh’s relations with neighbouring countries, mainly India and Pakistan.

Following Hasina’s demise, which hasstrained Dhaka–New Delhi ties, a Jamaat-led government would have more trouble setting up relations with India, according to Kean of the International Crisis Group.

With Jamaat in power as opposed to the BNP, India is seeking a reset following the election. Domestic politics in both countries would make it very difficult for Jamaat and the BJP to work together”, Kean said, referring to Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Hindu majoritarian Bharatiya Janata Party.

Regardless of which party is in power in Dhaka, Kean predicted that there will still be tensions with India over a number of “perennial issues,” including those relating to immigration, border security, and the sharing of water.

Bangladesh has also made steps to rekindle ties with Pakistan since Hasina’s fall in August 2024, including resuming diplomatic contact, pursuing new trade and transportation links, and making high-level official visits after years of tense contact.

Jamaat supporters say the February 12 vote is more than an electoral test. A party’s ability to convert organizational resilience into national legitimacy as a governing force is the subject of a referendum on whether it can do so after a long period of controversy and exclusion.

According to Khan, a professor at SOAS University, the outcome of the contest will depend more on promises of governance than ideology.