What El Mencho’s death means for Mexico’s cartels

Mexico kills cartel leader El Mencho. Violence erupts nationwide. What changes now?

Mexico says it killed El Mencho, leader of the powerful Jalisco New Generation Cartel. Within hours, highways burned and violence spread across multiple states. His death is being called a victory, but removing a kingpin doesn’t dismantle a cartel. What changes now for Mexico, and what doesn’t?

In this episode: 

Episode credits:

This episode was produced by Noor Wazwaz, Sonia Bhagat, and Marcos Bartolome, with Spencer Cline, Tamara Khandaker, Tuleen Barakat and our host, Malika Bilal. It was edited by Sarí el-Khalili.

Our sound designer is Alex Roldan. Our video editors are Hisham Abu Salah and Mohannad al-Melhemm. Alexandra Locke is The Take’s executive producer. Ney Alvarez is Al Jazeera’s head of audio. 

Connect with us:

Cuba: Technological Disobedience

In US-blockaded Cuba, ingenious mechanics and inventors revive old machines in order to survive during a time of scarcity.

When the Soviet Union collapsed in 1991, Cuba was plunged into crisis. Fuel, food and spare parts vanished almost overnight. This character-led documentary shows how common Cubans refused to give up – and instead built a new culture of radical repair. From Havana’s Malecon to small-town back yards, it follows mechanics, street vendors and a teacher-turned-inventor who live by one rule: “invent and resolve”.

New Zealand fight back to eliminate cohosts Sri Lanka from T20 World Cup

⁠New Zealand have recovered from a poor start to crush Sri Lanka by 61 runs in the Twenty20 World Cup Super Eights and eliminate the cohosts from the tournament.

Mitchell ⁠Santner led New Zealand’s recovery on Wednesday with a captain’s knock of 47 off 26 balls after coming in with his side in huge trouble at 84-5 to power them to a competitive 168-7 at the R Premadasa Stadium in Colombo.

Recommended Stories

list of 4 itemsend of list

Sri ⁠Lanka managed 107-8 in reply, never recovering from a top-order collapse and succumbing to their second defeat in the Super Eight stage of the 20-team tournament.

Rachin Ravindra (4-27) and Matt Henry (2-3) impressed with the ball for New Zealand.

“It’s embarrassing to disappoint the home crowd. They’ve been very supportive,” Sri Lanka captain Dasun Shanaka said.

“We wanted to restrict them to 130, ‌but to be honest, they played really well, so we must give them credit.”

Having lost to England in their first Super Eight match, it was a do-or-die game for Sri Lanka, and they initially showed a sense of urgency with the ball after electing to field.

New Zealand got off to a strong start before losing openers Finn Allen and Tim Seifert in successive overs.

They were 75-2 in the 10th over before the Sri Lankan spinners wreaked havoc to reduce them to 84-6.

Maheesh Theekshana (3-30) removed the well-set ⁠Ravindra (32) and Mark Chapman in the same over to turn the screw.

Santner joined ⁠Cole McConchie, who made 31 not out, in a rapid 47-ball stand of 84 that proved decisive.

Santner smacked four sixes as New Zealand plundered 70 runs from the last four overs to ensure their bowlers had a decent total to defend.

Henry bowled Pathum Nissanka for ⁠a duck with the first ball of the Sri Lankan innings and deceived Charith Asalanka with a slower delivery in his next over.

Player of the match Ravindra then ⁠whittled out Sri Lanka’s middle order to derail the chase.

The left-armed ⁠spinner sent down a two-wicket over in which Kusal Mendis and Pavan Rathnayake were stumped to reduce Sri Lanka to 29-4 in the ninth over.

Ravindra also dismissed Shanaka for three to essentially seal their victory.

Kamindu Mendis (31) and Dunith Wellalage (29) offered brief resistance, but Sri Lanka were never ‌in the chase.

“It’s one of those wickets where, if you can get in and give yourself a bit of time, you can cash in,” Santner said.

“It was pretty tough to start out there, so to hit 160 ‌was ‌nice.”

Group 2 leaders England have qualified for the semifinals with four points from two matches.

Iran rejects ‘fictional narratives’ of power grab after protest killings

Tehran, Iran – Iranian authorities have rejected reports that a former president tried to grab power at the height of last month’s nationwide protests and characterised the claims as “purely fictional narratives”.

A French media report saying former moderate President Hassan Rouhani gathered influential clerics, Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) commanders, and other figures, like former Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif, to take power was “likely based on false information and speculative accounts provided to the author”, Iran’s embassy in Paris said on Wednesday.

Recommended Stories

list of 3 itemsend of list

“This article is a clear example of an organised campaign to produce and disseminate false and fabricated information aimed at damaging Iran’s image. It holds no real value or credibility,” it said in a statement released by state media.

The report said Rouhani’s alleged attempt to overthrow 86-year-old Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and rebrand the Islamic Republic failed after Iran’s security chief Ali Larijani refused to support it. Larijani has now been given expanded powers in case of war with the United States, according to Western media reports this week.

Rouhani and Zarif were placed under arrest shortly after thousands were killed on the nights of January 8 and 9 during the anti-establishment protests, according to the French report.

The claim of the arrests was first raised last month by two hardline politicians, including a lawmaker, but was denied by Rouhani and Zarif separately at the time. Appearing next to former reformist President Mohammad Khatami, Rouhani also released photos from a funeral event to show he was not under arrest.

On Tuesday, Rouhani’s office slammed the reports that he was positioning himself to replace Khamenei – who has been in power for 36 years – and framed it as a “continuation of the psychological operations of American and Israeli sources”.

The former president said in a statement that the reports were aimed at creating “doubt and concern among public opinion in Iran to complete their [the US and Israel] maximum pressure through economic sanctions and military threats”.

Reformist challenges

In its statement on Wednesday, the Iranian embassy in France also rejected any connection between the arrests of top reformist leaders earlier this month and the alleged neutralised power grab scheme.

The arrests “were solely related to public statements and the issuance of declarations made during the unrest” in January, according to the embassy.

Some of the reformists have since been released after posting considerable bail, but several remained incarcerated as they had previous political prison sentences hanging over their cases with judicial and intelligence authorities.

The most damning statement by a former official and reformist figure after the protest killings was from former presidential candidate Mir Hossein Mousavi, who has been under house arrest since shortly after the 2009 Green Movement protests. Multiple political activists were arrested in connection with helping the release of his statement, which said that the “game is over” and called for a peaceful transition away from the Islamic Republic.

Former Presidents Khatami and Rouhani also called for major reforms, and Iran’s Reformists Front said it would have to cease to exist if the theocratic establishment does not take steps to change course.

Iran’s supreme leader, however, called the events during the unrest a “coup” that was carried out to serve the interests of the US and Israel.

Student protests restarted this week in Tehran and multiple other major cities after universities were reopened for the first time after the January nationwide protests.

The condemnation of the foreign media reports by Iran’s authorities come amid two other stories publicly rejected over recent days.

The Mojahedin-e Khalq (MEK), a foreign-based group considered a “terrorist” outfit by Tehran for launching armed attacks on Iranian soil decades ago, claimed a major operation on the headquarters of the supreme leader this week.

It said in a short statement that more than 100 of its fighters were killed or arrested, and more than 150 more fled, after “inflicting heavy casualties” and engaging in an hours-long firefight early Monday inside a compound located in Tehran’s Pasteur area – where numerous government offices are located.

While some residents reported hearing loud noises on the day, and unconfirmed reports said a number of schools in the surrounding area were closed abruptly, there was no evidence to suggest a bloody battle in the area.

Gholamreza Sanaei Rad, a senior IRGC commander and deputy for the political-ideological office of the supreme leader in the force, suggested that such a large operation could not have taken place at a top security compound in the capital without anyone noticing.

“This is merely a claim, and they are making it to introduce themselves as an alternatives for their masters, who have now turned to the pro-monarchy and Pahlavi camp,” he told the state-linked Iranian Labour News Agency on Sunday, in reference to US support for Reza Pahlavi, the son of the Iranian shah deposed in the 1979 Islamic revolution.

The IRGC-affiliated Mehr news agency said that several “mercenaries used PVC tubes to make something like a children’s toy and create some noise in Tehran to keep benefitting from their masters”.

Iran has blacklisted a number of US politicians for funding the MEK or delivering speeches at their ceremonies. The group has little support in Iran, partly because its forces joined former Iraqi President Saddam Hussein during his eight-year invasion of Iran in the 1980s.

This week, another Western media report suggested that Turkiye might launch a military operation inside Iran to secure its own borders if a war with the US leads to chaos and prompts Iranians to seek refuge in the neighbouring country.

But a statement by the communications office of Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan, carried by Turkish news outlets and picked up by Iranian counterparts on Sunday, rejected the allegation as containing “disinformation”.

Where the Silence Breaks | Ep 3 – Colombia

As part of Colombia’s peace process, former National Army soldiers confess to taking part in extrajudicial killings to the victims’ families.

Colombia continues to navigate the fragile aftermath of more than five decades of armed conflict. Although the 2016 peace agreement formally ended hostilities between the state and the FARC-EP rebels, sustaining peace has proven far more complex than signing it.

This episode follows former members of the national army accused of carrying out the so-called “falsos positivos” (false positives) — extrajudicial executions in which innocent civilians were executed, then falsely presented as combat casualties by the government as a way to bolster the numbers of enemies killed. Soldiers testified to their involvement in the assassinations to the families of the victims as part of the peace process. We also explore the suffering and anguish of those who have had their families devastated by these killings.

Their testimonies unfold within the framework of the Special Jurisdiction for Peace (JEP), the justice mechanism established under the peace agreement between the Colombian state and the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC-EP).

The JEP applies a model of transitional and restorative justice centred on victims and with full guarantees of due process. Its mandate is to investigate, prosecute and sanction those most responsible for serious human rights violations. The system provides two pathways: a restorative process for those who acknowledge responsibility, provide full truth, and contribute to reparation and guarantees of non-repetition; and an adversarial process for those who do not.

Currently, more than 17,000 individuals are appearing before the JEP, including former FARC-EP members, members of the armed forces, and civilian third parties. The jurisdiction has issued indictments for maximum responsibility, delivered restorative and adversarial sentences, and conditionally waived criminal prosecution for non-most-responsible participants.

US issues new Iran sanctions on eve of nuclear talks in Geneva

The United States has issued a new wave of sanctions against Iran, targeting ships that it said are selling Iranian oil to help fund the country’s ballistic missile programme.

The penalties on Wednesday come a day before US and Iranian negotiators are set to meet for a third round of nuclear talks this year amid a massive military build-up by Washington in the region.

Recommended Stories

list of 3 itemsend of list

As President Donald Trump continues to issue threats against Iran, Washington said it is also ramping up economic pressure against the country.

“Iran exploits financial systems to sell illicit oil, launder the proceeds, procure components for its nuclear and conventional weapons programs, and support its terrorist proxies,” Secretary of the Treasury Scott Bessent said in a statement.

“Under President Trump’s strong leadership, Treasury will continue to put maximum pressure on Iran to target the regime’s weapons capabilities and support for terrorism, which it has prioritised over the lives of the Iranian people.”

While the US calls the Iranian oil trade “illicit”, Iran, which is selling its own petroleum products, describes the crackdown on its energy sector as piracy.

The US has been intensifying sanctions against Iran as it amasses military assets – including two aircraft carriers and large fleets of fighter jets – in the region in apparent preparation for war.

Wednesday’s penalties targeted 12 vessels, as well as several companies and individuals that the US said are involved in Iran’s oil sales and weapons acquisition.

The new sanctions will freeze targeted assets of the designated firms and individuals in the US and make it mostly illegal for American citizens to engage in financial transactions with them.

Washington has been piling such sanctions on the Iranian economy since Trump nixed the multilateral nuclear deal with Tehran in 2018 during his first term.

That agreement, known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), saw Iran scale back its nuclear programme in exchange for the release of international sanctions.

After returning to the White House in 2025, Trump reignited his economic maximum pressure campaign against Tehran with the goal of choking off Iran’s oil exports.

Still, the two countries have been engaging in diplomacy to avert the looming conflict.

On Wednesday, Iran’s Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi, who is leading the diplomats representing Tehran at the talks in Geneva, said it is possible to “fair and balanced” agreement with Washington.

He stressed that Iran – which denies seeking a nuclear bomb – is ready to answer any concerns or questions about its uranium enrichment programme.

“But we are not ready to give up our right to peaceful use of nuclear technology,” Araghchi told India Today in an interview.

The assertion appears to contradict US calls for zero uranium enrichment by Iran.

The top Iranian diplomat also dismissed Trump’s claim that Iran is developing missiles that could reach the US.

Araghchi said Trump often complains about fake news, but he has become “the victim of fake news” himself.

“We are not developing long-range missiles, and we have limited the range of our missiles below 2000km [1,240 miles],” he said, stressing that the Iranian missile programme is designed for self-defence to deter attacks against the country.

In his State of the Union speech on Tuesday, Trump said the US reiterated that Washington is seeking a deal with Tehran.

“We haven’t heard those secret words: ‘We will never have a nuclear weapon,’” Trump told Congress.

Coincidentally, Araghchi had said hours earlier that “Iran will under no circumstances ever develop a nuclear weapon”.