What do Russian nationals, analysts make of US-led Ukraine peace talks?

The main obstacle to peace is Russia’s view of Ukraine’s refusal to accept its terms for a ceasefire.

Vladimir Putin, the president of Russia, is reportedly blocking a truce, as claimed by Kyiv and many of its European allies.

Recommended Stories

list of 4 itemsend of list

A delegation from the United States flew to Russia on Tuesday for five hours of behind closed doors discussions with Putin. Steve Witkoff, the son-in-law of US President Donald Trump, and Jared Kushner, the group’s leader.

Yuri Ushakov, a Putin aide, acknowledged that “a lot of work lies ahead.” He described the meeting as “very useful and constructive.”

He said there was “no compromise” had been reached on territorial issues, calling Ukraine’s desire to join NATO a “key question.”

Since Moscow launched a full-scale assault on Ukraine in 2022, Ukrainian officials find Russia’s position absurd. Given the ongoing bombing of Ukrainian cities, they think Putin has no real interest in achieving peace.

Ilya Budraitskis, a Russian political scientist and visiting scholar at the University of California, Berkeley, reported to Al Jazeera, “These negotiations did not end in success, as was expected. They are based on fundamentally different ideas about what is happening between the Americans and the Kremlin.”

Putin doesn’t really care about the American effort to sell the idea of peace resting on the exchange of territories. He wants to alter Eastern Europe’s entire security system.

Russia’s “unreliable counterpart”: an analyst

However, some Russians support the Kremlin’s point of view and use similar expressions.

The Kyiv regime’s “progress toward a peaceful settlement,” “factual distortions, and attempts to delay the inevitable,” said Spartak Baranovsky, a political scientist and member of the Moscow-based Digoria Expert Club, a think tank whose positions largely align with those of the Russian government.

The Ukrainian side rejected the initial conditions of the Istanbul peace agreement after refusing to implement the Minsk agreements. He told Al Jazeera, “It is really difficult to strike up a productive conversation with such a lacked trustworthiness.”

In order to end the conflict in Donbas, where separatists supported by Russia were fighting the Kyiv government, the Minsk agreements were a number of treaties that were signed in 2014 and 2015. Numerous meetings between Russian and Ukrainian delegations in Belarus and Turkiye, all of which failed to bring about peace, took place after the full-scale invasion of 2022.

Russia’s general optimism that the war will end is palpable despite the lack of detailed information from this week’s meeting.

Tatyana, a 60s businesswoman from Saint Petersburg who declined to provide her full name, believes that Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy’s European allies have pushed him to prolong the conflict.

What has the world come to when Trump, the only person who appears to be acting rationally in this situation, is by nature utterly insane? she inquired.

“Everyone is now in for a much worse situation. The advantage is obviously on Russia’s side, which the crude American generals and everyone else understand, despite the fact that a decision needs to be made.

Dmitry Peskov, a spokesman for the Kremlin, announced on Tuesday that Russian troops had finally taken control of the strategically important city of Pokrovsk in eastern Ukraine, putting an end to a two-year siege. In recent months, Ukraine’s forces have struggled to stop Russia’s advance in a number of regions despite the country’s claim that the city has fallen.

The proposed terms of an agreement that are being discussed include that Ukraine should withdraw its troops from the areas of the Donbass region, which will become a neutral demilitarized zone but be recognized as Russian territory internationally. The Crimean Peninsula and the Donetsk and Luhansk People’s Republics, which have been under Russian or pro-Russian rule since 2014, will also be recognized as Russia. Ukraine’s military capacity is set at 600,000, and it must abandon any plans to join NATO, but its application for EU membership will be taken into account.

Russia must also make a pledge not to invade any more European nations, which must be stipulated in its constitution. Additionally, a proposed war crime amnesty is proposed.

Putin stated last week that if Ukrainian troops leave the areas they occupy, the plan could serve as the basis for future agreements. We will accomplish our objectives militarily if they don’t.

According to sources, Ukrainian negotiators told their US counterparts over the weekend that giving up any territory was not a possibility.

Can Russia sustain itself for a long time?

Putin fully comprehends that Ukraine is in the dead of a long stretch, according to Washington, DC-based Russian economist Vladislav Inozemtsev.

Putin is therefore very confident in everything. He has some time. He has a year or two to fight. The West’s motivations and willingness to fight are more at fault. Yes, he is willing to wait until his conditions are met, but not until Ukraine is exhausted and given up.

Putin raised the stakes by threatening Europe before Tuesday’s meeting.

He warned that if Europe wants to and begins, we are prepared right now, even if Russia is not.

Putin will be preparing for this, just like he did before 2022, according to Budraitskis of the University of California, Berkeley, who said that the opposite was true when he said that Russia was not going to attack Ukraine.

Inozemtsev and Baranovsky both agree that Russia can continue to pursue a war effort indefinitely despite their divergent viewpoints.

“It’s not a problem at all to fight for years at such an intensity,” said Inozemtsev.

“We saw more problems than there are now because they needed to be mobilized, they now receive a fairly high salary from them, and [new volunteers] are constantly enlisting,” says one veteran. Additionally, they experienced issues with weapons, and some, particularly active commentators, predicted that shells would run out in three months. In fact, there is a greater level of munitions production now than there was before the war.

According to Inozemtsev, “the Americans are very determined to end this war or completely withdraw from any support for Ukraine.”

He added, “I believe that Kyiv has now been clearly informed of this.” The Ukrainians will therefore be persuaded that they are incapable of saving them, according to the statement. In the sense that, if the Americans are now completely eliminated, Europe will, of course, have no money or the willpower to continue to support this cause for years.

According to Inozemtsev, a deal might still be in Ukraine’s interests.

“In fact, this is the solution to the problem,” he said, “if they are able to guarantee themselves 600,000 for the army and a break for at least a few years.”

Putin will always be a threat, according to Putin, and the West’s main task will always be to surpass Putin’s 73-year-old. If the fighting lasts three to five years, he is already on the verge of passing away, which naturally lowers his moral standards.

Russian economic benefit will be benefited by any potential peace agreements and the lifting of sanctions, but Inozemtsev and Budraitskis doubt that things will turn around in the country in 2022. According to their forecasts, society will continue to be heavily militarized and tightly controlled.

Because we no longer have a direct threat from abroad, Budraitskis said, “There can be no peace, no return to a normal situation in which all these measures that correspond to a full-fledged repressive totalitarian dictatorship will be abolished.”

Putin’s regime in Russia was designed in this way, including how his power was organized, how his government operated, and how there was an endless war where Russian elites were consolidated under the flag and how any dissidents were subjected to repression inside the country.

He continued, citing the “normality” that Putin “established” in Russia after 2022 as an integral component of “war in any form” against Ukraine, Europe, the Baltic states, or “anyone.”

He predicted that the war would continue on various fronts to allow this regime to remain.

Some Russians have already made a long-term commitment.

Tunisia arrests top opposition leader Nejib Chebbi in widening crackdown

As a crackdown on opposition leaders in Tunisia, which was once a beacon of young democracy in the years following the Arab Spring, grows, according to his family, Tunisian police have taken Ahmed Nejib Chebi’s arrest.

On Thursday, Chebbi was detained at his home days after receiving a 12-year sentence for plotting against the government in a trial that human rights organizations called “sham” and politically motivated.

Recommended Stories

list of 3 itemsend of list

The 81-year-old’s daughter claimed police had removed him from their home in a Facebook post.

The arrest was confirmed by his attorney, Amine Bouker, who claimed Tunisia’s “political scene has become frightful.”

Chebbi, one of the co-founders of the nation’s main opposition coalition, the National Salvation Front (FSN), is one of several opposition figures, attorneys, and rights advocates who have been subject to recent arrests and prosecution.

One of Saied’s most prominent critics, who seized a sweeping power in 2021, more than a decade after Tunisia overran Zine El Abidine Ben Ali during the Arab Spring uprisings, is he?

Since then, rights organizations have criticized the president for overseeing a profound rollback of freedoms.

In the so-called “conspiracy case,” dozens of opposition figures received sentences last week that could lead to up to 45 years in prison.

A rights activist and lawyer Ayachi Hammami was detained on Tuesday in response to Chaima Issa’s Saturday arrest. During the trial, they were each sentenced to five and twenty years in prison.

In an interview with Al Jazeera Arabic, Chebbi blasted the verdict against him as “unjust” and with “no legal basis.”

Chebbi claimed that he and other opposition figures who had been ensnared in the crackdown had not broken any laws. Additionally, he criticised the nation’s legal system.

He claimed that there are no judges in place. We have employees who are used to exact revenge on political opponents under the leadership of the political authorities.

On November 7, 2025, Tunisians protested and demanded the release of Tunisian opposition figure Jawhar Ben Mbarek.

Unjustified deeds are the definition.

The case has been described as a “sham trial” that has been the target of numerous human rights violations by Amnesty International.

After the appeal court’s verdict, political activists Chaima Issa, Ahmed Nejib Chebi, and Ayachi Hammami, both of whom have been found guilty, are now facing an “imminent and arbitrary risk of arrest,” according to Sara Hashash, Amnesty’s deputy regional director for the Middle East and North Africa, in a statement last week.

Detainees held “solely for exercising their human rights” must be immediately released, according to her. “The Tunisian authorities must immediately overturn the unfair convictions and sentences against all defendants in the “corruption case.”

The European Parliament urged Tunisia to release “all those detained for exercising their right to freedom of expression, including political prisoners and human rights defenders,” according to a vote taken last week.

Saied, however, criticized the resolution as “blatant interference,” claiming that the European Union could “learn lessons about rights and freedoms from us.”

The National Salvation Front, the coalition Chebbi cofounded, claimed in a statement that the Tunisian government was carrying out a “campaign of political “extermination” against their political opponents following the sentences being handed down last week.

The coalition claimed that the decision to issue the verdicts without interrogations or hearings was a result of the authorities’ concern about exposing the truth and false information and that the trial’s sole goal was to criminalize political activism and remove political figures whose names and credentials have been cited in opposition political activism.

Gaza militia leader accused of collaborating with Israel killed: Reports

Developing a Story
According to several Israeli media reports, Yasser Abu Shabab, the head of a gang in the Gaza Strip, was convicted of looting humanitarian aid and working with Israel.

Without providing further details, Channel 14’s initial report on his death on Thursday was made public. Abu Shabab was later pronounced dead at the Soroka Medical Center in southern Israel after being killed in “Gaza clans.”

Recommended Stories

list of 3 itemsend of list

When Israel’s genocidal war against Palestinians in Gaza was fought by his so-called Popular Forces, Abu Shabab was accused of stealing the little humanitarian aid that the Israeli government allowed into the coastal enclave.

Later, Israeli officials announced that they were working with armed groups in Gaza, including those led by Abu Shabab, to set up a local anti-Hamas force.

The precise circumstances surrounding Abu Shabab’s death are still a mystery, according to Al Jazeera’s Hani Mahmoud, who was a reporter from Gaza City on Thursday. The big question mark is “Who killed Yasser Abu Shabab? ” – it’s not yet clear,” he said.

According to Mahmoud, Abu Shabab and his group were “notorious” in Gaza as a result of their alleged links to aid looting and drug trafficking.

They were accused of “deliberately preventing the entry of aid trucks into the northern part of Gaza, where displaced families were forced to endure famine and the spread of starvation,” Mahmoud continued.

He was described as a “counterweight] to]Hamas by the Israeli military and Israeli officials.

A Hamas-affiliated security force in Gaza, Radaa, uploaded a photo of Abu Shabab to Telegram on Thursday with the message “Israel won’t protect you.”

Abu Shabab was given ten days to turn himself in in Gaza in July on suspicion of treason, conspiring with hostile groups, starting an armed gang, and leading an armed rebellion.

The gang leader allegedly served time for drug trafficking by Hamas in the past.

According to experts, Abu Shabab’s rise is a result of Israel’s longstanding strategy to support Palestinian armed groups in an effort to stifle political movements and resistance.

Israel’s blockade of the Gaza Strip, which has led to a humanitarian crisis and famine in several areas, led to the looting of aid in the region.

Eurovision organisers debate whether Israel should be barred from contest