As tariffs hit, Americans grapple with rising bills and multiple jobs

Dallas, United States – Melinda, a teacher at a Dallas high school, has an easy way to predict if her students will have a good day.

“If they show up and they’ve had breakfast, it’s a really good day,” said Melinda, who has worked as a Texas teacher for 13 years. Her students showing up fed, she added, “is rarer than you think”.

Recommended Stories

list of 4 itemsend of list

To help, Melinda spent about $45 per week on breakfast items and snacks during the last school year. While such practices are common among US teachers, she asked Al Jazeera not to use her real name. However, rising prices for groceries and school supplies may force her to stop, especially since Texas teachers’ salaries are not keeping up with inflation.

When Melinda went to the store in late August, the same items now cost her $56 per week. That means, over the course of a school year, she could spend $400 more for the food her students rely on.

“I’m trying to work out how to keep that in my budget, because prices are just crazy, and I like to keep it to where it’s [available to all students] so people aren’t singled out.”

Melinda’s worries are just one example of a broader problem brewing in the United States. After the administration of US President Donald Trump issued an onslaught of tariffs on countries around the world, Americans are seeing price increases creep into their lives. Rising costs of groceries, bills, rent and essential baby items are creating new burdens for people across the country, millions of whom work more than one job.

Pinching pennies

Tariffs are the rate that importers must pay to import their goods, and some economists have pointed out that it will take time for US consumers to bear the full brunt of Trump’s tariffs.

That’s no small comfort for Katie Ventre, a 37-year-old Long Island resident who oversees payroll, finances and HR for her father-in-law’s auto repair company. Her husband is the CEO of the company, and together, they’re trying to start a car rental service. Increases in grocery prices – especially the cost of fruit, eggs and milk – have been frustrating for their family, Ventre told Al Jazeera, but the auto business has been hit even harder.

“We just had the worst two months in the last eight years,” she said in early September. To pinch pennies, she said, customers are reducing the amount they spend, or delaying repairs altogether. Meanwhile, the Ventres raised their prices in an attempt to offset the cost of imported goods.

“It’s not just us,” Ventre added. “We have a towing company we work with that’s seeing a slowdown … and all our vendors are addressing [the tariffs] in their own way. Some are raising prices, some are trying to wait and see if things get better.”

Other companies aren’t waiting. The think tank Groundwork Collaborative has been tracking earnings calls and the remarks that C-suite executives have made about price increases, and in a new report, they detail how some companies are using the tariffs as cover to hike prices.

“The indirect effect of tariffs is that it gives steel producers and the mills and other fabricators … great cover for increased pricing in some cases,” Aaron Jagdfeld, CEO of the power generation products company Generac Power Systems, said on an earnings call this summer.

Among those raising prices are the security and digital products company Fortune Brands Innovations Inc, the footwear company Rocky Brands and the apparel company Hanesbrand, whose CEO, Stephen Bratspies, said the company is “seeing tariff-related disruptions creating incremental revenue opportunities in the market”.

Russell Diez-Canseco, the president and CEO of Vital Farms, put it more succinctly in a recent call to investors: “The price we’ve talked about, that is more than sufficient to cover the impact of the tariffs.”

Elsewhere, major brand names like Walmart and household goods titan Procter & Gamble are raising prices and attributing the move to the cost of tariffs. Several studies show such increases are already impacting customers’ wallets.

In a July 3 survey, nearly half of the likely voters interviewed told the Groundwork Collaborative and Data for Progress that Trump’s tariffs are having a negative impact on their monthly finances, with only 16 percent reporting a positive impact.

Back-to-school season exacerbated these issues, as prices rose on everything from shoes to essential items as simple as pencils.

“Parents are facing price increases across a number of categories when it comes to school supplies,” Sarah Dickerson, a research economist at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, told a local TV station. “If we look at pencils, for instance, we know the wooden pencils are imported from Brazil. We are anticipating price hikes there.”

Canary in the coal mine

Lindsay Owens, the executive director of the economic think tank Groundwork Collaborative, told Al Jazeera that fall 2025 will offer the strongest picture yet of how tariffs are affecting the US economy.

“We have long expected that some of the big price hits would drop in the fall,” said Owens, whose organisation researches how the economy impacts consumers and workers.

“Back to school season is kind of the canary in the coal mine, but we’re expecting high prices for Halloween items, for costumes, things like that that are coming in from China. We’re also expecting some of these impacts to flow through to Christmas, whether that’s price hikes on toys or even supply chain issues where there are just fewer toys available.”

Owens says rising prices and the cost of living have been the top economic issues for Americans since 2021. Now, tariffs are further influencing what Americans buy, where they buy it and, in some cases, the jobs they work or pursue.

According to recent data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS), nearly 8.8 million Americans are working more than one job – down just slightly from the all-time high of 8.9 million in February.

Kay Alexander, a 30-year-old in Austin, is one of those Americans with multiple jobs.

Alexander lost his job in the tech industry during a round of layoffs at the beginning of 2025. He drastically cut his food spending and started looking for a cheaper apartment, which proved nearly impossible in Austin.

“Prices surge within a few months without any notice,” he said.

Shortly after the layoff, he noticed “daily essentials” such as groceries becoming more expensive. BLS data shows the cost of groceries has risen 29 percent since February 2020, while another study shows prices are up almost 3 percent from this time last year.

Alexander and his partner cut out snack foods and opted for the cheapest possible option for items like eggs and milk, which still weren’t that cheap. Plus, he added, “I can taste the difference.”

“It’s definitely shifted the way that we shop and the way that we eat,” he said of the tariffs. Even now that he has found a pair of part-time jobs and feels more comfortable dining out or going to a bar, he says he is still focused on saving “as much money as possible”.

“It’s hard to put in words the trauma of a job loss right now, when you know you might have to replace that one job with two others,” he said. “So I’m trying to save and do whatever I can to avoid that feeling.”

He has gotten used to buying lower-quality groceries, but now he feels as if his quality of life is worsening. For instance, he’s grown to like one of his part-time jobs even more than his project management work in the tech industry. But he feels drawn back to the volatile tech sector, if only to pay his higher bills.

“I really have to figure out, am I going to go to work and make sure that I can keep up with my bills, or am I going to show up for myself and make sure that I’m OK?” he said.

‘Food is discretionary’

Isabel Deniz, a 31-year-old living in Austin, Texas, agrees.

She worked in social media marketing until a layoff in late 2024, and any given month, she may be working up to six side gigs to keep up with rent and other bills.

When she was interviewed for this story, she was selling clothes on the online marketplace Poshmark, working as a theatre stagehand and cutting and stamping craft ice cubes for cocktail bars. Then, shortly after, she picked up yet another job: bail bond runner.

“I’m enjoying not being in front of a screen and actually talking to people face to face and moving my entire body around, but it’s also like, I need three of those jobs to survive,” she said, adding that all her friends are working more than one job.

“Going outside is expensive,” she said. “The second you step outside, it’s like, ‘That’ll be $20’.”

That means she is constantly examining what qualifies as a discretionary expense.

“Food is discretionary at this point, and it’s like, ‘Oh, sick, a disposable income of $42. What am I going to do with 42 bones?’” she said. “I’m worried the worst is on the way.”

DR Congo’s ex-President Joseph Kabila sentenced to death in absentia

Developing a Story

Former President Joseph Kabila was sentenced to death in absentia by a military court in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC).

The military tribunal’s presided over the military tribunal, led by Lieutenant General Joseph Mutombo Katalayi, announced on Tuesday that Kabila had been found guilty of a number of crimes, including treason, crimes against humanity, murder, sexual assault, torture, and insurrection.

Recommended Stories

list of 3 itemsend of list

Kabila, who presided over the country from 2001 to 2019, left in 2023 after making a recent visit to the M23 rebel-controlled region in the east of the nation.

The former president allegedly supported the Rwanda-backed M23 rebels, who this year seized significant swathes of territory in the eastern DRC, in absentia in a trial in July.

Kabila had previously called the court system “an instrument of oppression” and previously criticized the case against him.

Following the military court’s ruling, Kabila’s whereabouts were unknown at the time.

Trump says Hamas has ‘three or four days’ to respond to Gaza proposal

Hamas has “three or four days,” according to Donald Trump, the president of the United States, according to Trump, who claimed that Israeli and Arab leaders had already ratified the plan.

Trump said at the White House on Tuesday, “Hamas is either going to be doing it or not, and if it isn’t, it’s going to be a very sad end.”

Recommended Stories

list of 4 itemsend of list

When questioned about the proposal’s potential for negotiation, he responded, “Not much.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu thanked Trump for “accepting the plan,” according to the US president.

A day after the White House released a 20-point document calling for an immediate ceasefire in the Gaza Strip, the exchange of Israeli prisoners for Palestinians in Israeli prisons, and a staged Israeli withdrawal from Gaza, Trump made the remarks.

Hamas would be required to disarm under the proposed plan, and the US would work with Arab and international partners to set up a “temporary international stabilization force.”

Hamas would not participate in Gaza’s governance, according to the plan. Those who wish to leave the enclave would be given safe passage abroad, while its members would receive amnesty if they “peacefully coexist.”

Trump added that the plan also includes guarantees that “the people of Gaza will not be removed will not be removed,” as well as a transitional government of Palestinian technocrats that will provide daily services in Gaza, self-governance, and the return of displaced residents.

The Israeli-led two-year conflict in Gaza is now being pursued with a humanitarian crisis and the death toll for Palestinians has exceeded 66 000.

According to the Qatari Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the Hamas’s negotiating team is studying Trump’s strategy.

Meanwhile, Fatah, the Palestinian Authority’s (PA) ruling political party, publicly praised US efforts to end the war and protect civilians.

Fatah reportedly stated that it was ready to work with all parties to secure a ceasefire, allow humanitarian aid to enter Gaza, secure the release of Palestinian prisoners, and establish international safeguards for Palestinians.

The organization also reiterated Mahmoud Abbas’s commitment to holding elections one year after the end of the war.

The US proposal was described as a “document of surrender” imposed on the Palestinians without the consent of senior Fatah official Abbas Zaki.

He alleged that Washington and Israel were trying to “liquidate the Palestinian cause” by warning that accepting it would “intensify humiliation, legitimize occupation, and fragment Palestinian unity.”

Not an offer, but a ultimatum

UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres’ spokesman said the UN chief applauded the US efforts and urged “all parties] to commit to an agreement and its implementation.”

According to Farhan Haq, “the Secretary-General reiterates that our top priority must be to lessen the enormous suffering caused by this conflict.”

According to Al Jazeera’s Mike Hanna, a reporter from Washington, DC, Trump’s comments on Tuesday demonstrate that Hamas’ offer to him is not “an offer,” but rather an ultimatum.

According to Hanna, “We’ve heard there’s a chance that Hamas might not comply.”

Why are US Tomahawk missiles for Ukraine a ‘red line’ for Russia?

Russia claims to be closely monitoring Ukraine’s request for long-range “Tomahawk” missiles, which might increase Kyiv’s ability to strike deep inside Russia.

The request comes as US President Donald Trump appears to be shifting his stance on support for Ukraine against Russia because of his growing frustration with President Vladimir Putin’s war push despite a meeting to discuss peace in Alaska in August.

Recommended Stories

list of 4 itemsend of list

Speaking to media on Monday, Russian government spokesperson Dmitry Peskov maintained that the weapons, if delivered, would not be a game-changer in the war. However, he suggested that the US might be breaking the red line Moscow had previously drawn in response to what it perceives as direct interference by Ukraine’s allies.

“As before, the question is: Who can launch these missiles?” … Can only Ukrainians launch them, or do American soldiers have to do that? Who determines the missiles’ target? The Ukrainians themselves or the American side? Peskov asked.

Moscow has previously stated that it will consider providing intelligence or targeting data as crossing the line. It has been suggested on numerous occasions that Russia might restart producing intermediate-range nuclear weapons and stationing similar missiles close to the West.

In a Monday post on Telegram, former Russian President Dmitry Medvedev warned that such interference could result in a war with “weapons of mass destruction”.

What we know about the US’s position on Tomahawks and what it might mean to deliver them to Ukraine:

In Dnipro, Ukraine, on September 20, 2025, a handout from the country’s state emergency service shows rescuers responding to a drone strike near a residential building.

What weapons has Ukraine asked for and how has the US responded?

Volodymyr Zelenskyy, the president of Ukraine, said he requested the Tomahawk missiles when he met with President Donald Trump in New York on the occasion of the UN General Assembly last week.

In an effort to prevent an escalation of tensions with Putin, the US government under Joe Biden had previously prohibited Kyiv from using US weapons to attack Russia. Ukraine was allowed to target Russian positions in occupied territory.

Zelenskyy claimed that Trump had told him that Ukraine could retaliate against Russian strikes in a similar manner, such as by attacking Ukraine’s energy infrastructure if Russia attacked Ukraine’s energy resources in an interview with Axios last week.

US Vice President JD Vance confirmed to Fox News on Sunday that Kyiv has requested that the US government be taking Tomahawks in the delivery of the aircraft. Vance did not reveal details, but said that Trump would be making the “final determination”.

Meanwhile, US Special Envoy to Ukraine Keith Kellogg made a comment on the request later on Sunday during a separate Fox News interview. There are no such things as sanctuaries, according to Kellygg, who claimed that the Trump administration already gave Kyiv the right to launch deep attacks on Russia in specific circumstances.

INTERACTIVE - What are Tomahawk missiles - September 30, 2025-1759225571
]Al Jazeera]

How do Tomahawk missiles work?

Tomahawks, which can be launched from ships, submarines, or ground launchers, are long-range subsonic cruise missiles. They have long-range, deep-strike capabilities, and can hit targets 1, 250km-2, 500km (777-1, 553 miles) away.

They carry high-explosive warheads designed to pierce military bunkers and other hardened targets. Tomahawks also fly quickly because they maintain low altitude while avoiding radar detection by moving at high subsonic speeds.

The US Navy has used Tomahawks since the 1970s. US weapons company RTX is the only company making missiles right now.

What makes Ukraine want Tomahawks?

Kyiv has long been requesting powerful long-range missiles to strike deep inside Russia, but its Western allies, which form the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (NATO), have mostly been reluctant to risk a bigger conflict by agreeing to provide these.

Some have since censured their position and given Ukraine more freedom over how it uses the weapons it does possess.

Former US President Joe Biden eased restrictions on the launch of US missiles just before his election-year, partly because Trump had stated he would not support Ukraine further during his presidency.

In May 2023, the UK began delivering the British and France-built Storm Shadow (or SCALP in France), a long-range missile weighing 1, 300kg (2, 866 pounds), and with a range of about 250km (155 miles). The UK then granted Kyiv the right to directly use its weapons against Russia in August 2024.

A long-range surface-to-surface missile artillery system capable of hitting targets up to 300 kilometers (186 miles) away, the US sent Ukraine its Army Tactical Missile Systems (ATACMS) in April 2024.

Both the Storm Shadow and ATACMS systems are limited in range and explosives compared to Tomahawks, however.

Ukraine has developed its own drone-missile systems, including the turbo-jet drone Paliantysia, which Kyiv claims can hit targets located 650 kilometers (404 miles) away from its allies’ restrictions on the use of their weapons.

The Flamingo, a ground-launched missile that Ukraine claims can target locations up to 3, 000 kilometers (1, 864 miles) away, was also unveiled in August, but it’s not clear if it has actually launched one.

Marina Miron, an analyst at King’s College, London, told Al Jazeera that, based on data shared by Ukraine, a Flamingo may in fact have better range and destructive capabilities than a Tomahawk. She noted that Ukraine may still be asking for US missiles for primarily strategic reasons.

“It might be interesting to see how Russia reacts because Ukraine also understands that firing a missile like that might entice Russia to use more force,” Miron said.

Regardless, if Kyiv receives the Tomahawk weapons, analysts say it could significantly expand Ukraine’s strike capabilities and allow it to hit targets deep inside Russian territory, including military bases, logistics hubs, airfields and command centres.

Russian expert Keir Giles, a member of the UK think tank Chatham House, claimed that the missiles would also stifle Russia’s front-line defense strategies.

Giles referred to the Russian military’s strategy of hunkering just outside the range of missile launches launched from Ukraine, and said, “deep strikes would be targeted on significant military installations and ensuring that Russia can no longer hide behind the front lines.”

However, Miron argued that while Tomahawks would undoubtedly hurt Russia, the damage would be limited. Is Russia going to have to resign from Ukraine? She said, “I don’t believe it.”

President Zelenskyy himself has suggested Ukraine might not actually need to use long-range US missiles against Russia if it has possession of them. He claimed in an interview with Axios that powerful missiles could be used as a merely a means of influencing Russia’s willingness to accept peace.

Zelenskyy told Axios, “We need it, but that doesn’t mean we’ll use it.” “Because if we will have it, I think it’s additional pressure on Putin to sit and speak”, he said.

Ukrainę President Volodymyr Zelenskyy speaks during the 80th session of the United Nations General Assembly, Wednesday, Sept. 24, 2025, at U.N. headquarters. (AP Photo/Yuki Iwamura)
On September 24, 2025, during the 80th session of the UN General Assembly, Ukraine’s Volodymyr Zelenskyy addresses [AP] Yuki Iwamura/AP

If the US sent Tomahawks to Ukraine, what might Russia say?

Russia perceives Western support for Ukraine as a potential “threat of force”, but is unlikely to take drastic action, analysts say.

Western nations have continued to provide humanitarian and military aid to Ukraine despite Moscow’s veiled threats.

Sergey Lavrov, the country’s foreign minister, reiterated Russia’s position at the UNGA last week. “Threats of force against Russia … are becoming increasingly common. Such provocations have been repeatedly refuted by President Putin.

Russia has never had such intentions and does not, but he warned that any aggression against my nation would be met with a swift response.

Giles said Moscow often makes threats, but mostly as a scare tactic, and that Russia is particularly careful with the US. Washington would be expected to respond in response to an attack on any NATO member, just like it would for all other NATO members.

Analysts believe Russia may be “testing” NATO’s willingness to use military force despite recent Russian drone incursions that have raised concerns about the potential for military action.

” Russia says everything is a red line, “Giles said”. Russia would not choose to pursue the nuclear option. Because they are aware of how disastrous it would be, Russia would be least interested in engaging in combat with a unified bloc, especially with the US.

epa12389292 Police officers and soldiers work at the site of suspected remnants of a Polish missile found in Choiny village, eastern Poland, 19 September 2025. The remains of what are most likely a Polish missile that was launched to shoot down a Russian drone were found in the eastern village of Choiny. Overnight from 09 to 10 September 2025, Russian drones repeatedly violated Polish airspace during a major aerial attack on Ukraine, which Warsaw described as a provocation. The incident prompted Poland and its NATO allies to scramble fighter jets, and Poland said that the drones posing a direct threat were shot down that night. EPA/WOJTEK JARGILO POLAND OUT
Police officers and soldiers work at the site of suspected remnants of a Polish missile launched to shoot down a Russian drone, found in Choiny village, eastern Poland, on September 19, 2025]Wojtek Jargilo/EPA]

What is Europe’s response to threats from Russia?

The Tomahawk discussion has not received any comments from European leaders.

However, the bloc has been rattled by a recent series of incursions into its airspace by Russian drones and aircraft.

Poland briefly secluded itself from Russian airspace on Sunday in preparation for a Russian attack on Ukraine. That occurred on September 9 when Polish and NATO fighters shot down 20 Russian drones in Polish skies. That marked the first time a NATO member had directly engaged with Russian military assets since Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in February 2022.

Estonia reported last week that three Russian MiG-31 jets, which were “armed with missiles and ready to fight,” had entered its airspace for 12 minutes before being forced to leave. The UN Security Council’s emergency meeting was called by the nation after the incursion, at which allies criticized Moscow.

On Monday, Denmark banned all drone flights for a week after it repeatedly sighted drones over its airspace, including last week, when several airports were forced to shut down.

In September, drone sightings in Romania, Latvia, Norway, Germany, and France were also reported.

German Chancellor Friedrich Merz made the claim that Moscow is trying to undermine continent unity at a media event in Düsseldorf on Monday. Germany has refused to deliver its long-range Taurus missiles to Ukraine for fear of escalation with Russia, and has not changed its stance.

Liberals are catalysts to catastrophe, again

Jimmy Kimmel, the late-night talk show host, was suspended on September 17 for his remarks regarding Charlie Kirk’s passing. Following widespread upheaval, he was reinstated a few days later.

Kimmel read Donald Trump’s post on Truth Social, saying, “I can’t believe ABC fake news gave Jimmy Kimmel his job back,” in his first return on air.

Kimmel responded, “You can’t believe they gave me my job back,” without a second thought. I find it hard to believe we gave you your job back.

I wanted to know, Jimmy, why not, while the liberal crowd roared appreciatively. I think it’s true.

liberal illusion

Kimmel is back on television, and Americans’ liberal elite can breathe a collective sigh of relief. Because it allows them to return to their blissful slumber, ignore reality, cling to cognitive dissonance, denial, ahistorical wishful thinking, and the complicity that is essential to white supremacy within a white supremacist order, not because liberals and their Democratic Party have learned from the incident and used it as an opportunity to galvanise meaningful opposition to Trump’s authoritarian surge.

Liberals don’t actually consider Trump and his supporters to be a significant threat. They believe the pendulum will eventually swing back to the trustworthy liberal system after a brief period of time.

Liberals don’t even share the policy tenets of Trump’s core, in fact. After all, both the right-wing and liberal elites are devoted servants of empire, giving it a veneer of humanitarianism.

Both organizations back policies that perpetuate the oppression of the poor and underrepresented populations, including extractivism and militarism abroad and labor exploitation, mass incarceration, militarised policing, censorship, and corruption through corporate donations. With discussions of diversity, rule of law, and human rights, the liberals have put their spin on all of these.

The liberals have focused on the left as the biggest threat, while supporting the right. They have attacked it not only within the partisan ranks, but they have also ignored attempts by the right to obstruct it. The revolutionary left, which is the only real threat to the current capitalist oppressive system, is being marginalized.

Liberals frequently ignore challenges to fundamental freedoms and rights, including the right to protest and the right to free speech.

The liberal establishment has thus contributed to the spread of fascism both domestically and internationally.

The Palestinian problem

The US’s descent into fascism is illustrated by the suppression of the struggle for freedom, equality, and justice in Palestine.

Liberal leaders promoted the two-state solution and an endless “peace process” that supported and justified apartheid and disenfranchisement in Palestine even before the genocide that Israel committed in Gaza. By continuing to give Israel military aid and offering unreserved support for its more brutal and bloody massacres against the Palestinian population, they kept the American weapons manufacturers happy.

In line with a political consensus to combat resistance to US/Israeli criminality, the liberal Democrats introduced and supported anti-boycott, divestment, and sanctions (BDS) laws and resolutions across Congress and state legislatures, along with their Republican counterparts. Additionally, they backed the false definition of anti-Semitism used by the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA), which targets and targets principled opposition.

Liberals and the Biden administration continued to run interference for Israel while further undermining international law as Palestinian civilians were subjected to carpet bombing, torture, kidnapping, and starvation at the start of the genocide. It supported harsh crackdowns on anti-genocide protesters, which may have cost Democrats the election, and silenced Palestinian voices at the Democratic National Convention.

Trump’s authoritarian policies were laid the groundwork for this crackdown on dissent against the US-Israeli genocide.

The Republican-aligned Heritage Foundation unveiled “Project Esther” in October 2024, a strategic blueprint designed to sabotage anti-colonial resistance by vilifying activism, scholarship, and higher education as a whole, prior to Trump taking office.

Liberals are still holding themselves accountable for their roles in the current predicament, but these Orwellian measures are already fully in motion.

echoes from the past

The liberal establishment of today is repeating a tragic farce while opportunistically marginalizing left-wing policies and rolling out the red carpet for the right, effectively stifling the wheels of the fascist rollercoaster.

German liberals struck similar agreements with reactionary elites in the 1920s and the early 1930s, putting socialism, the loss of some privileges, as a greater threat than fascism, and elevating “order” and “peace” above justice. Adolf Hitler’s rise, which culminated in World War II, was aided by their support of communist and anarchist targets.

Trump waltzes boldly as he trashes the US Constitution while the coy and cautious US liberals of today are content with the status quo and shy away from confrontation. Today’s liberals are joining in silencing and scapegoating the left in place of challenging reactionaries, much like Weimar liberals did when they tiptoed around fascism until it was too late.

Even as Trump begins to violate the unspoken rule of the US ruling class, which is to steal from anyone, just don’t cannibalize your own, is still in effect.

Nothing in the liberal mindset has changed since Trump’s first term, as demonstrated by Dave Chappelle and Chris Rock’s iconic Saturday Night Live skit after his first election, where Trump watches the results come in for him. Chappelle deadpans, “Oh my God, I think America is racist,” as a shocked white liberal sighs. “You know, I remember my great-grandfather told me something like that. Like, he was a slave or something.

Despite his numerous flaws, Trump is able to accurately acknowledge the duplicity, corruption, and weakness of liberal politics.

After Kimmel was reinstated, he retorted on Truth Social, saying, “Why would they want someone back who plays 99% of the Democrat GARBAGE and is so poorly, who isn’t funny, and who puts the Network in danger?” See how we fare. When I pursued them, I received 16 million dollars. Even more lucrative seems to be this one. A truly “lot of losers”

The audience chuckled more than usual.

The liberals are once more blatantly causing chaos by applauding and laughing at the chaos while placating the political parties’ campaign funds.