Harris rebuts criticism of prosecutor past in Charlamagne tha God interview

From the earliest days of her candidacy, one topic has loomed over Vice President Kamala Harris’s presidential bid: her track record with criminal justice reform in the United States.

On Tuesday, Harris — the Democratic nominee for the presidency — had a chance to address some of the criticisms, in a town hall-style interview with radio host Charlamagne tha God.

It was also an opportunity for Harris, the former attorney general of California, to bolster support among the Black community.

While the vast majority of Black voters identify with the Democratic Party, recent polls show their backing for Harris is not as strong as in 2020, when fellow Democrat Joe Biden was running for president.

Harris took the offensive on Tuesday, very quickly steering the conversation towards correcting the record about her candidacy.

“Folks say you come off as very scripted,” Charlamagne began, in the first minute of their conversation. “They say you like to stick to your talking points —”

The vice president immediately jumped in. “That would be called discipline,” she quipped.

It was an apparent effort to draw a distinction between herself and her Republican rival Donald Trump, whose public appearances are often described as rambling.

Harris continued to give sharp rebuttals to criticisms of her public appearance as buttoned-up.

“What do you say to people who say you stay on the talking points?” Charlamagne asked.

“I would say, ‘You’re welcome,’” she replied.

Charlamagne tha God, co-host of iHeartMedia’s morning show The Breakfast Club, speaks to Kamala Harris in Detroit for a radio town hall [Jacquelyn Martin/AP Photo]

Prosecutor past under spotlight

A former prosecutor who became district attorney of San Francisco and then attorney general of California, Harris has long faced scrutiny for her approach to criminal justice.

On the campaign trail this election cycle, Harris’s allies have sought to leverage her background to the Democrat’s advantage, framing the race as a battle between “the prosecutor” and “the felon”.

Trump, after all, has 34 felony convictions to his name, after he was found guilty in May of falsifying business records in relation to a hush-money payment to an adult film actor.

Harris herself has leaned into that framing. On July 23, shortly after she launched her presidential campaign, Harris struck a contrast between herself and Trump, who faces a total of four criminal indictments.

“Before I was elected vice president, before I was elected United States senator, I was elected attorney general of the state of California, and I was a courtroom prosecutor before then,” Harris told a rally in Wisconsin.

“And in those roles, I took on perpetrators of all kinds: predators who abused women, fraudsters who ripped off consumers, cheaters who broke the rules for their own gain. So hear me when I say, I know Donald Trump’s type.”

But critics have blasted Harris for that same history as a prosecutor, with members of both the right and left slamming her policies.

Progressives, on one hand, have criticised her hard-handed approach to issues like student truancy: Harris famously championed a state law that would make parents eligible for a misdemeanour if their child were chronically absent from school without an excuse.

In 2014, Harris also opposed calls to implement an independent system to review the fatal use of force by police.

Critics at the time argued that local prosecutors work closely with police and are therefore unable to be objective when deciding whether to bring charges. Harris, however, said, “I don’t think it would be good public policy to take the discretion from elected district attorneys.”

Her opponents on the right, meanwhile, have accused Harris of being lax on crime and failing to adequately support law enforcement.

Decriminalising marijuana

In her interview with Charlamagne, Harris sought to tamp down on the criticism against her by branding it the product of right-wing misinformation.

“One of the biggest challenges that I face is mis- and dis-information,” Harris told the radio host. “And it’s purposeful. Because it is meant to convince people that they somehow should not believe that the work I have done has occurred and has meaning.”

Charlamagne, for his part, called on Harris to answer several rumours swirling around her campaign.

“One of the biggest allegations against you is that you targeted and locked up thousands of Black men in San Francisco for weed. Some said you did it to boost your career. Some said you did it out of pure hate for Black men,” he said, asking: “What are the facts of that situation?”

Harris refuted the allegations, replying, “It’s just simply not true.”

She then pivoted to her work on lowering penalties for marijuana possession, an issue that disproportionately affects Black men.

A 2020 analysis from the American Civil Liberties Union, for instance, found that Black people are 3.64 times more likely to be arrested for possessing the drug, compared to white people. The report, however, found no significant difference in marijuana use between the two populations.

That difference in arrest rates contributes to higher incarceration rates overall for Black men in the US. The Pew Research Center found that, in 2020, Black adults faced five times the rate of imprisonment as their white counterparts.

Referencing this discrepancy, Harris told Charlamagne that she would decriminalise marijuana on the federal level if elected president.

“My pledge is, as president, I will work on decriminalising it, because I know exactly how those laws have been used to disproportionately impact certain populations and specifically Black men,” she said on Tuesday.

Approximately 24 states have already taken steps to legalise small quantities of marijuana for recreational use. But on the federal level, the drug remains illegal, though the Biden administration has taken steps to lower penalties.

In May, for instance, Biden’s Justice Department initiated a new rule reclassifying marijuana as a “schedule III drug”, down from the highest rank under the Controlled Substances Act’s five-tier system.

That reclassification made the drug acceptable for medical use. It also indicated a shift in the government’s position, to acknowledge that marijuana is not as dangerous as the other drugs in its previous category, like heroin.

“As vice president, [I] have been a champion for bringing marijuana down on the schedule,” Harris told Charlamagne. “So instead of it being ranked up there with heroin, we bring it down.”

Charlamagne tha God interviews Kamala Harris in a radio studio
Charlamagne tha God pressed Vice President Harris about her commitment to the Black community in the US [Jacquelyn Martin/AP Photo]

Attacking Trump on ‘stop and frisk’

Harris not only defended her criminal justice work as “progressive”, but she also actively attacked her Republican rival Trump for policies she warned would be detrimental to the Black community.

Throughout his campaign, Trump has championed a crackdown on crime in the US, proposing policies that critics warn could increase the use of excessive force among law enforcement officers — and cause the violation of civil liberties.

Last month, for instance, Trump floated the idea of having “one real rough, nasty day” for law enforcement to address property crime without restraint.

He has also pledged to strengthen police immunity from prosecution and push for increased use of “stop and frisk” policies.

“You have to do a policy of stop and frisk,” Trump told the TV show Fox and Friends in August, envisioning a situation where a police officer recognises a suspect on the street. “Stop and frisk and take their gun away.”

While the US Constitution protects people from “unreasonable search and seizure”, advocates say “stop and frisk” policies allow the police to search suspects in an un-intrusive manner if they have a “reasonable suspicion” they may be armed or dangerous.

But critics warn that “stop and frisk” has been used to racially profile people and harass them without warrant or cause. Some “stop and frisk” policies have therefore been struck down as unconstitutional.

Harris zeroed in on Trump’s support for “stop and frisk” in Tuesday’s interview.

“My opponent”, she said, would have “a formalised stop and frisk policy, for which he has said, if a police department does not do it, they should be defunded”.

“There is so much at stake” this election, she added, pointing to the potential risks for the Black community, which has been disproportionately targeted by such policies.

Pressure on Harris

Harris’s appearance on the radio town hall with Charlamagne came one day after the Democratic candidate made another major overture to Black voters, releasing an “Opportunity Agenda for Black Men“.

That agenda outlined plans for decriminalising marijuana, promoting cryptocurrency and providing one million “forgivable” loans for Black entrepreneurs.

If elected, Harris would be the first woman — and the first person of mixed Black and South Asian descent — to win the White House.

But while she carries a majority of support among Black Americans, some pollsters see concern in how her numbers compare to the 2020 election. In that race, President Joe Biden carried 90 percent of Black votes, according to a survey from The New York Times and Siena College.

By contrast, only 76 percent of the Black electorate plan to vote for Harris, Biden’s vice president, in this year’s election. That’s a significant drop — and the poll showed even lower numbers among Black men.

Only 69 percent backed Harris, compared to 81 percent of Black women.

Trump has tried to make gains in that demographic — and he has even publicly questioned Harris’s identity as a Black woman.

During her town hall on Tuesday, Harris faced questions about her commitment to the Black community. One caller asked her about her “lack of engagement” with the Black church.

Harris refuted that claim too. She replied that she had grown up in the Black church.

Australia to ban ‘dynamic pricing’ of tickets after Green Day uproar

Australia has announced plans to ban “dynamic pricing” of tickets for concerts and sporting occasions following uproar over the cost of high-profile events.

Australia’s centre-left government said on Tuesday that it would outlaw a range of “tricky tactics” used by businesses, including the practice of raising ticket prices as demand increases.

The Labor Party government’s proposed reforms would also target “subscription traps” that make it difficult to cancel a service, fees that are hidden or added in stages, and manipulative online practices such as claiming a product can only be bought for a limited time.

Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said the measures would stop businesses from engaging in “dodgy practices” to rip off customers.

“Today’s announcement puts businesses engaging in unfair trading practices on notice,” Albanese said. “Hidden fees and traps are putting even more pressure on the cost of living and it needs to stop.”

Treasurer Jim Chalmers said most businesses operate fairly and would have nothing to worry about.

“This is all about cracking down on dodgy deals to save Australians money if we can, and where we can,” Chalmers said.

The move comes after Ticketmaster generated a backlash from music fans last month when it listed tickets for American punk band Green Day’s upcoming Australian tour for as much as 500 Australian dollars ($335) each.

Ticketmaster’s “In Demand” ticket pricing system also sparked outrage in Ireland and the United Kingdom after fans of British rock band Oasis reported waiting in virtual queues for tickets for hours only to see prices surge dramatically when it came to the moment of purchase.

Eight of Ireland’s 14 members of the European Parliament backed calls for legislation to prevent such practices following the uproar.

US military amends records of those discharged with ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell’

The United States military has upgraded the records of service members discharged under an old anti-LGBTQ policy known as “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” in an effort to make amends.

Defence Secretary Lloyd Austin said on Tuesday that 851 service members who lost their positions under “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” had their status changed to “honourable discharge”.

Those who received discharges in categories other than “honourable” often lost out on military benefits, which range from educational funds, healthcare, pensions and other forms of compensation.

“Brave LGBTQ Americans have long volunteered to serve the country that they love. Some of these troops were administratively separated from military service under the now-repealed ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell’ policy,” the statement reads.

“Under President [Joe] Biden’s leadership, the Department of Defense has taken extraordinary steps to redress the harms done by ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell’ and other policies on these former Service members.”

The move is the latest effort to address the legacy of the discriminatory policy, which was issued by Democratic President Bill Clinton in 1994.

The directive allowed LGBTQ people to serve in the military so long as they kept their identities hidden. Any openly gay or bisexual people were otherwise vulnerable to expulsion.

Clinton championed “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” as an alternative to previous military policy, which banned homosexuality outright. The Democrat had hoped to end the ban if elected president but was unable to, as he faced stiff resistance from military leaders and members of Congress.

That ultimately led to the rise of “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell”: Military personnel were not required to reveal their sexual orientation, nor were officials supposed to inquire.

Critics, however, pointed out that the new policy was equally discriminatory. It was ultimately repealed in 2011, allowing LGBTQ people to serve openly in the military.

However, some 13,500 service members were discharged while “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” was in force.

The Biden administration has attempted to address historical anti-LGBTQ discrimination in the military, even beyond “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell”.

In June, Biden issued “unconditional pardons” to those service members convicted under the now-repealed Article 125 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice for consensual sex.

Previously, Article 125 barred sodomy and other “unnatural carnal copulation with another person of the same or opposite sex”. Thousands of people had been court-martialed under the law.
Biden’s pardon, however, helped some of those affected regain access to lost benefits.

In the case of “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell”, the Defense Department announced that it would proactively review old records in September 2023.

“After a year of exceptional work, the Military Department Review Boards directed relief in 96.8% of the 851 cases that they proactively reviewed,” said Austin.

US state of Georgia reports record turnout on first day of early voting

The state of Georgia has reported a record turnout on the first day of early voting in the United States elections, revealing a high level of engagement in the key battleground state.

Hours after polls opened in the southern state on Tuesday, election officials reported that more than 251,000 voters had already cast their ballot in person.

One of several races on the ballot is the high-profile showdown for the White House: Vice President Kamala Harris — the Democratic presidential candidate — is set to face off against her Republican rival, former President Donald Trump.

Tuesday’s voter tally in Georgia blew away the state’s previous record for the first day of in-person early voting, set in 2020. That year saw 133,000 residents show up to vote.

“As of 4pm [ET] we have crossed the quarter million mark with 251,899 votes cast. Spectacular turnout. We are running out of adjectives for this,” Gabriel Sterling, the chief operating officer for the Office of the Georgia Secretary of State, posted on X.

Historically, large turnouts for early voting have favoured Democrats, although both parties have been urging voters to go to the polls early in states where it is allowed.

US presidential elections are ultimately determined through a weighted voting system called the Electoral College.

Each state has a certain number of Electoral College votes to award, and most grant those votes in a winner-takes-all system: Whichever candidate wins the state — no matter how small the margin — receives all the Electoral College votes.

Georgia, with its 16 Electoral College votes, is one of seven tightly-fought “swing states”, which could lean either Democrat or Republican this election cycle. Other battleground states include Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin, Arizona, Nevada and North Carolina.

Close races in those states could determine who becomes the next president.

Eyes on Georgia

Tuesday’s tally has been interpreted as a sign of voter enthusiasm, particularly as the presidential race enters its final stretch. Election day — the final opportunity to cast a ballot — is set for November 5.

Both Harris’s and Trump’s campaigns have set their sights on winning Georgia. Trump rallied in its capital, Atlanta, on Tuesday, and Harris is set to hold her own event in the city on Saturday.

In 2020, President Joe Biden became the first Democrat to win the state since 1992, a victory largely attributed to a huge uptick in Black voting. Black residents account for about one-third of Georgia’s population.

But with a margin of victory of just 11,779, the state also became a key lever in Trump’s campaign to overturn Biden’s victory.

In the wake of the 2020 election, Trump infamously pressured Georgia’s top election official to “find” more votes, and he actively spread misinformation that the ballot tally was marred by election fraud.

The Republican leader was subsequently indicted on state racketeering charges in relation to his alleged efforts to overturn the vote.

The pending case, led by Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis, will not go to trial before the 2024 election. Nevertheless, recent polls show Harris and Trump remain locked in a neck-and-neck race in the state.

Some Democrats fear that an apparent softening in Black voters’ support for Harris could help tip the race.

While Black residents overwhelmingly support Democratic candidates, a recent poll from The New York Times and Siena College showed Harris polling at lower levels than Biden did in 2020.

In turn, Trump’s campaign has increasingly sought to appeal to Black voters, whom critics say Democrats have taken for granted.

Trump’s claim that migrants are taking “Black jobs” has become a mainstay of his stump speech.

Harris has also made a concerted effort to appeal more to Black men. Earlier this week, she released a policy plan that would include giving forgivable business loans to Black entrepreneurs, more support for studying diseases that disproportionately affect African-American men and legalising marijuana on the federal level.

“Black men have long felt that too often their voice in our political process has gone unheard and that there is so much untapped ambition and leadership within the Black male community,” the Harris campaign said upon releasing the proposal.

Court ruling

Meanwhile, questions about the validity of Georgia’s election proceedings, fuelled by Trump’s false claims of fraud, have continued to hang over the state’s vote.

On Monday, Fulton County Superior Judge Robert McBurney ruled that local election board members could not refuse to certify election results in any situation.

That came in response to a local election board member’s request that the court rule that the certification is discretionary.

The request stoked concerns that some election board members — particularly those who have cast doubt on the 2020 results — would refuse to certify results in their counties.

Such a refusal would have wide-ranging implications in an election that could come down to just a handful of votes.

McBurney also blocked a new Georgia State Election Board rule that would have required districts to hand-count ballots.

Russia-Ukraine war: List of key events, day 964

Here is the situation on Wednesday, October 16, 2024.

Fighting

  • Russia launched a drone attack on Kyiv, according to officials in the Ukrainian capital. There was no information immediately available about casualties or damage.
  • Ukraine launched a series of drone attacks on Russia’s southern border region of Belgorod, injuring at least eight people and damaging cars and property, regional Governor Vyacheslav Gladkov said.
  • Ukrainian authorities ordered the evacuation of Kupiansk and Borova in the northeastern Kharkiv region amid the advance of Russian forces. Kharkiv Governor Oleh Syniehubov said the evacuation order was mandatory.
  • The White House said it was “concerned” by claims made by Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy that North Korean soldiers were fighting for Russia in Ukraine. The Kremlin has dismissed the allegation as “fake news”.

Politics and diplomacy

  • European Council President Charles Michel said Zelenskyy has been invited to attend a summit of European Union leaders in Brussels on Thursday to “take stock of the latest developments of Russia’s war against Ukraine and present his victory plan”.
  • Four-fifths of Ukrainians support a new law banning Russia-linked religious groups accused of being a tool of Moscow, according to a survey by the Kyiv International Institute of Sociology.
  • A Russian man who was released from a penal colony after being jailed over an antiwar picture drawn by his daughter told a Russian human rights group that he had endured terrible conditions, including two months in an isolation cell he described as a “torture chamber”.

Economy

  • Russian natural gas deliveries to the EU have been “significantly higher” than long-term contracts should see delivered, despite the bloc’s efforts to reduce its dependency on fossil fuels from the country, the bloc’s Commissioner for Energy Kadri Simson told a news conference.
  • Russian energy giant Gazprom said it would sell 14 hotels and resorts after suffering an annual loss of nearly $7bn, its first such loss in almost a quarter-century.

Boeing shores up finances even as striking workers rally

In a move to shore up its sagging finances, Boeing has announced plans to raise up to $25bn through stock and debt offerings and a $10bn credit agreement with major lenders amid a production and regulatory crisis.

Boeing announced its plans on Tuesday.

It was not clear when and how much the plane maker would eventually raise via the offering, but analysts estimate that Boeing would need to raise somewhere between $10bn and $15bn to be able to maintain its credit ratings, which are now just one notch above junk.

The company is grappling with a slump in production of its best-selling 737 MAX jet following a mid-air door panel blowout earlier this year and a strike by thousands of United States union workers since September 13.

Boeing said on Tuesday it had not drawn on the new $10bn credit facility arranged by BofA, Citibank, Goldman Sachs and JPMorgan, or its existing revolving credit facility.

“These are two prudent steps to support the company’s access to liquidity,” Boeing said, adding that the potential stock and debt offerings would provide options to support its balance sheet over a three-year period.

The company’s shares were up by 1.6 percent on Tuesday.

S&P Global and Fitch had warned of a downgrade last month. The ratings agencies said on Tuesday that the stock and debt offerings could help preserve Boeing’s investment-grade rating.

“The supplemental credit facility also seems like a sensible precaution,” S&P Global’s Ben Tsocanos said.

However, some analysts were not convinced.

“We take the vagueness and breadth of the shelf announcement and the need for the temporary financing as implying that the banks are struggling to sell this issue to potential investors or lenders,” Agency Partners analyst Nick Cunningham said.

The offering was too big for immediate liquidity needs or not big enough to permanently refinance the company, Cunningham noted, adding that it may imply short-term liquidity is worse than thought.

Cunningham suspended his recommendation and price target for Boeing’s shares.

On Monday, Emirates Airlines president Tim Clark became the first senior industry figure to articulate fears over Boeing’s ability to tackle its worst-ever crisis intact.

“Unless the company is able to raise funds through a rights issue, I see an imminent investment downgrade with Chapter 11 looming on the horizon,” Clark told Air Current, an aviation industry publication.

The strike is costing Boeing $1bn a month by one estimate [File: David Ryder/Reuters]

Boeing will use the funds for general corporate purposes, according to paperwork filed with the US markets regulator on Tuesday.

The planemaker had cash and cash equivalents of $10.89bn as of June 30.

Rising costs

The strike is costing the company more than $1bn per month, according to one estimate that was released before Boeing announced it would cut 17,000 jobs or 10 percent of its global workforce.

The company and the Machinists Union, which represents about 33,000 striking workers in the US Pacific Northwest, are yet to reach an agreement over a new contract and talks have become increasingly heated.

On Tuesday, hundreds of striking workers packed the main hall at union headquarters chanting,  “Pension! Pension! Pension!” and “One day longer, one day stronger!”

“We want Boeing management to know that we’re strong and united, and their scare tactics aren’t going to work,” said Matthew Wright, a 52-year-old electrician who works on the 767 jet. “We’re not afraid of them.”

Boeing last week withdrew its latest offer, which included a 30 percent wage increase over four years, after talks also attended by federal mediators broke down.

US Acting Deputy Secretary of Labor Julie Su met with Boeing and the union in Seattle on Monday in a bid to break the deadlock.

US Representative Pramila Jayapal gave a rousing speech at the rally on Tuesday, addressing the cheering crowd and slamming Boeing for prioritising executive bonuses and share buybacks over everyday workers’ pay. The legislator, whose district includes most of Seattle, called on Ortberg to end the strike.

“He has an opportunity to turn this around and to actually give you the contract that you deserve, so that we can get back to building quality planes, so that you can get back to doing your jobs, so that the United States of America can continue to have the most sophisticated, quality company in the Boeing company that it has ever had,” she said.