‘Wael’s last wish’: Man detained by ICE denied release for son’s funeral

The restrictions placed on Maher Tarabishi will haunt him long after his 30-year-old son, Wael, is laid to rest.

For decades, Maher, 62, had cared for his son as he struggled with a rare genetic condition called Pompe disease, which causes muscle weakness and severe respiratory problems.

Recommended Stories

list of 3 itemsend of list

The disease required round-the-clock care and dozens of surgeries, which Maher carefully attended to.

But Maher was abruptly separated from Wael last year, as part of United States President Donald Trump’s immigration crackdown.

Last Friday, when Wael drew his final breath, Maher was not there to hold him. When Wael’s funeral is held on Thursday at a mosque in Arlington, Texas, Maher will once again be absent, unable to say his final goodbyes.

That is because Maher remains in the custody of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), and in each instance, his requests for a temporary release have been denied.

“Wael’s last wish was, ‘Let me at least just see my father. Let me at least hold his hand,’” Shahd Arnaout, Wael’s sister-in-law, told Al Jazeera.

Maher Tarabishi
Maher Tarabishi poses for a family photo with his son Wael [Credit: @freemahertarabishi on Instagram]

Maher, a Jordanian national, had lived in the US for years under a so-called “supervision order” from a court. It allowed him to remain in the country to care for his son, despite a 2006 order calling for his removal.

But the conditions of his stay included annual check-ins with ICE, which Maher completed for more than two decades. Over that time, he provided immigration agents with documents explaining his son’s complications from his surgeries and the care he needed to survive.

But on October 28, 2025, something changed. During Maher’s last check-in, ICE agents took him into detention as part of Trump’s hardline immigration policies.

His family spent months trying to convince officials of the role Maher played in his son’s life. Their petitions went unheeded.

Arnaout and other family members attended to Wael in his absence, but they were acutely aware of the unique bond the father and son had built over their 30-year relationship.

“It was very scary, because we didn’t want to do anything wrong,” Arnaout recounted. “His body was very fragile. We had to wait for Maher to call, so we could ask the questions we needed to ask.”

“One time, his feeding tube came all the way up,” she added. “We had to wait until Maher called so we could show him through video whether we were doing the right steps or not.”

‘ICE is responsible’

Wael’s family draws a direct line between his death and his father’s enforced absence, noting the 30-year-old experienced a physical and psychological decline as the months of separation stretched on.

During that time, he twice ended up in intensive care, and his health deteriorated during his most recent visit.

“ICE is responsible for the death of Wael,” Arnaout said. “They may not kill him with a bullet, but they killed him inside.”

As it became clear Wael’s final moments were approaching, family lawyer Ali Elhorr made a desperate appeal to ICE officials for Maher’s release.

First, Elhorr travelled to an ICE field office in Dallas, where he was told to contact the Bluebonnet Detention Center, where Maher was being held.

He was then given an email and sent back to the Dallas field office, before being redirected to another detention centre in Alvarado, Texas, an hour’s drive away.

Finally, Elhorr found the docket officer in charge and explained the situation. Soon after, he received an update.

“Basically, Maher would only be allowed a virtual [visit],” Elhorr recalled. “So basically, a Zoom call.”

Maher was not able to be in the room as his son died. Elhorr’s efforts to gain Maher a supervised release for Wael’s funeral met a similar end.

“Initially, it seemed like they had agreed. They asked me to send through email exact funeral details, like times and locations of the different events, and it seemed like they were actually working to move him,” Elhorr said.

“And then, about 15 minutes later, I get another call from the officer who said, ‘My director called me and told me that he would not be allowed to attend his funeral.’”

To Elhorr, the message was clear: “The decision was made from higher up.”

The government’s indifference to Maher’s requests has drawn nationwide outrage, as the family shared their story on a GoFundMe page to help raise money for their legal fees.

“It’s just no compassion. No moral compass. It’s shameful in this country,” said Mustafaa Carroll, the interim executive director of the Texas branch for the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR).

“I have four sons. I can’t imagine what that must be like,” Carroll added. “They’re treating him like a hardened criminal.”

‘This has to stop’

According to his lawyer and family, Maher has no criminal history and no history of disobeying the provisions set out by immigration officials.

They are seeking to have Maher’s immigration case reopened after discovering that the individual who initially filed his immigration paperwork appears to have fraudulently posed as a lawyer.

Elhorr hopes the case, which is making its way through immigration court, could lead to Maher’s removal order being nixed. He has lived in the country since 1994.

ICE did not respond to Al Jazeera’s request for information on Maher’s case.

However, in a statement to NBC News last year, an ICE spokesperson described Maher as a “criminal alien and self-admitted member of the Palestine Liberation Organization [PLO] – a murderous foreign terrorist organization that has carried out countless terrorist attacks and plane hijackings”.

Elhorr said the claim is as baffling as it is false. He emphasised that Maher has “zero involvement” with the PLO, which is an umbrella term for a coalition of Palestinian groups.

Furthermore, while the PLO was designated as a “terrorist” group by the US in 1987, it has been regularly granted waivers to maintain a diplomatic presence in the US.

For her part, Arnaout said Wael’s death has added a new dynamic to the push for Maher’s release.

“Maher was Wael’s arms, his legs, his lungs,” she said. “He has not been holding up. He is always alone, thinking about his son. We don’t want to lose him, too.”

Mbappe blasts Real Madrid after Champions League loss at Benfica

Real Madrid striker Kylian Mbappe has said his team “deserve” to be in their current situation because they were not consistent enough for a top-eight spot as his side slipped into the Champions League playoff round.

The record 15-time European champions fell to a 4-2 defeat at Jose Mourinho’s Benfica on Wednesday, finishing ninth in the league phase table, meaning they must face their Portuguese conquerors or Bodo/Glimt in February instead of reaching the last 16 directly.

Recommended Stories

list of 4 itemsend of list

After three wins in their previous three matches under new coach Alvaro Arbeloa, Madrid were brought back down to earth by Benfica in Lisbon.

“The problem is we aren’t consistent in our play, we have to fix that, you can’t have one day [playing well] and another not, a champion team does not do that,” Mbappe told reporters.

“We deserve to be in this situation today. Benfica were better. Now we have to play two more playoff games. It hurts to have to play those. We wanted to have the time in February to work on our game.”

Mbappe said he could not put his finger on a clear reason why Madrid played so poorly against Benfica.

“I think it’s a bit of everything. I can’t tell you it’s just a matter of attitude, because if I only say that, you’ll think we came here without any desire,” said the French superstar, who scored twice in the defeat.

“If I tell you it’s a football issue, you’ll think the team is bad. No, I think it’s a broader issue, and in the Champions League, every detail matters if you want to beat your opponent.

“It shows you that if you don’t come in with everything you need to win a Champions League match, the opponent will come and, as they say, make fools of you.”

However, Mbappe called on Madrid’s fans to support the team at the Santiago Bernabeu on Sunday against Rayo Vallecano in La Liga, rather than booing as they did earlier in January.

“Come and support the team – we had a bad game – but we are not knocked out of the Champions League, and in La Liga we’re in a good dynamic now,” pleaded Mbappe.

Senegal and Morocco handed fines and bans after AFCON final farce

African football’s governing body has issued fines worth more than $1m and banned Senegal’s coach and Senegalese and Moroccan players over a shambolic African Cup of Nations (AFCON) final that involved a walk-off protest by one of the teams, fans trying to storm the field and fights among journalists.

The bans, announced on Thursday, apply only to African games and not the World Cup, which kicks off in June and which Senegal and Morocco have both qualified for.

Recommended Stories

list of 4 itemsend of list

The sanctions announced by the Confederation of African Football (CAF) include fines totalling $615,000 for the Senegalese Football Federation and $315,000 for the Royal Moroccan Football Federation for unsporting and improper conduct by their players, coaching staff and supporters, among other offences.

At the January 18 AFCON finale, Senegal’s players walked off the pitch, led by coach Pape Thiaw, in protest against a penalty awarded late in regulation time to the hosts, Morocco. Thiaw, who last week defended his side’s actions, was banned for five African games and given a fine of $100,000 for bringing the game into disrepute, the African confederation said.

The game restarted after a delay of about 15 minutes. Morocco missed the penalty, and Senegal won the African title 1-0 after extra time.

The heated final in Rabat also saw supporters trying to storm the field, Morocco’s and Senegal’s players scuffling on the sidelines, reporters from the two countries fighting in media areas and a bizarre sequence in which Moroccan ball boys tried to seize a towel being used by Senegalese goalkeeper Edouard Mendy – in an apparent bid to distract him and help their team win the continental title.

That behaviour by the home team’s ball boys led to a $200,000 fine for Morocco’s federation, which will be a cohost of the 2030 World Cup alongside Spain and Portugal and has come under scrutiny for the chaotic African final.

That behaviour by the home team’s ball boys led to a $200,000 fine for Morocco’s federation, which will be a co-host of the 2030 World Cup alongside Spain and Portugal and has come under scrutiny for the chaotic African final.

Morocco was hoping to host the 2030 World Cup final in Casablanca at the Hassan II Stadium, set to be the largest football arena in the world with a capacity of 115,000 people after its planned completion in 2028. But this month’s African final reflected badly on it.

Morocco coach Walid Regragui said the game had given African football a “shameful” image.

Senegalese players Iliman Ndiaye and Ismaila Sarr were banned for two African games, Morocco’s Achraf Hakimi was also banned for two games with one suspended and Morocco’s Ismael Saibari was banned for three games and fined $100,000 for unsporting behaviour.

CAF dismissed an appeal by Morocco to have the result cancelled and Morocco declared the winner because of the Senegalese walk-off.

The game even strained diplomatic ties between Senegal and Morocco, prompting government officials in both nations to pledge to stay friends and call for calm. In Morocco, rights groups denounced what they called hate speech targeting sub-Saharan African residents in the country.

Senegalese Prime Minister Ousmane Sonko said on an investment-related trip to Morocco days after the game that the reaction to it should be seen as “emotional outbursts produced by fervour and not as political or cultural rifts”.

In a further blow to Morocco’s 2030 FIFA World Cup ambitions, the president of Spain’s football federation declared on Tuesday that his country would be hosting the final.

Israel seeks ‘more exits than entries’ at Gaza’s Rafah as Egypt objects

As preparations accelerate for the partial Israeli reopening of Gaza’s Rafah border crossing, tentatively scheduled for Sunday, a simmering dispute has erupted between Egypt and Israel regarding which and how many Palestinians may leave and return.

Many are seeking urgent medical attention that cannot be found in a healthcare system decimated by Israel in its more than two-year genocidal war. Others want to reunite with family or pursue an education, all put on hold because of the war.

According to a report by Israel’s public broadcaster Kan on Wednesday, Israeli negotiators have presented a condition regarding the flow of travellers: that the number of Palestinians leaving Gaza and entering Egypt through the crossing must exceed the number of those permitted to enter.

The broadcaster reported that Egyptian officials rejected this asymmetric formula, insisting on an “equal ratio” of entries and exits. Cairo reportedly fears that Tel Aviv’s position is a calculated attempt to engineer emigration and permanently reduce Gaza’s population.

While North Sinai Governor Khaled Megawer affirmed to local media Egypt’s operational readiness “for all scenarios”, the technological mechanisms being imposed on the ground suggest a system designed to filter the population.

INTERACTIVE - What is the Rafah crossing map-GAZA_ISRAEL_Oct 16_2023
(Al Jazeera)

‘Remote’ screenings for exit, physical screenings for entry

While Kan reported on the dispute over numbers, the Israeli news site Ynet revealed the technical details of the proposed operation, which suggest a crossing that operates on a double standard.

According to the website and security sources, all travellers must be vetted by Israel’s Shin Bet security service 24 hours in advance. But the actual crossing process differs sharply by direction. A European Union monitoring mission is also expected to be on hand, but its role is unclear. Here is the reported plan:

  • Leaving Gaza: For Palestinians exiting to Egypt, Ynet reported, there will be no physical Israeli presence inside the terminal. Instead, Israel will operate a “remote control” system. Facial recognition cameras will transmit live feeds to an Israeli command centre where officers will have the capability to remotely lock the electronic gates instantly if a “suspect” is identified.
  • Entering Gaza: For Palestinians trying to return home, the process is far more invasive. Returnees will be funnelled into an Israeli military checkpoint established just past the border. There, they will be subjected to body searches, X-ray scanning and biometric verification by Israeli soldiers before crossing the “yellow line”, which marks the 58 percent of Gaza that Israeli forces still occupy, and leaving Israel’s self-proclaimed buffer zone.

‘Rafah 2’: A one-way ticket?

This structural disparity has raised alarm among observers. Major General Samir Farag, former head of the Egyptian army’s Morale Affairs Department, told Al Jazeera that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is trying to bypass the 2005 Agreement on Movement and Access concerning the Rafah crossing.

Farag said the Israeli proposal involves opening Rafah “in one direction” for exit only as part of a “displacement” agenda – a move he said Egypt has “categorically rejected”.

Ibrahim Al-Madhoun, director of the Palestinian Institution for Media, argued that this setup, often referred to as “Rafah 2”, is not a border crossing in the traditional sense but a “sorting platform managed with a mentality of forced displacement”.

“Israel is making exit relatively easier via remote monitoring while making entry a humiliating, physical ordeal at a military post,” Al-Madhoun told Al Jazeera. “They are engineering a system where people are encouraged to leave but are too terrified – or simply denied permission – to return.”

The proposed system marks a departure from the 2005 agreement, which designated Rafah as a Palestinian-Egyptian crossing under EU supervision, specifically to guarantee Palestinian sovereignty.

Security expert Osama Khaled warned that the implications of the new mechanism go beyond logistics. By inserting itself into the minutiae of the crossing, Israel would secure a permanent chokehold on this Gaza lifeline.

“This is comprehensive electronic surveillance designed to ensure a mandatory Israeli presence,” Khaled said. “It transforms the crossing from a sovereign gateway into a tool for political blackmail.”

The sharp focus on the Rafah crossing also has a darker side. According to comments by retired Israeli General Amir Avivi, who still advises the military, Israel has cleared land in Rafah to construct an enormous facility to entrench its military control and presence in Gaza for the long term.