Nepal Gen Z protests amid social media ban, clashes kill 14: All to know

At least 14 people were killed in clashes with security forces after thousands of young people in Nepal took to the streets on Monday to protest against corruption and a government ban on social media websites.

A curfew was imposed in parts of Kathmandu after protesters entered the Parliament building in the capital and faced off against the police.

Here is what prompted the demonstration, dubbed the Gen Z protest, and what is the latest on the ground.

When did the protest begin in Nepal?

The protest began at 9am (03:15 GMT) on Monday.

Where are the protesters marching?

The protesters gathered in Maitighar, a neighbourhood in Kathmandu. It includes a busy road intersection, featuring the Maitighar Mandala monument — one of the city’s most iconic landmarks.

What’s happening in the Gen Z protest?

Aayush Basyal, a 27-year-old master’s student in Kathmandu who was present at the protest site, said the demonstration was “unprecedented with the number of attendees”.

However, Basyal added that as the protest progressed, “mobs of physically well-built guys came on their loud motorcycles through the crowd to create a sense of chaos”. It is this set of people, he said, that broke through the barricades to enter Parliament. Al Jazeera could not independently verify this claim.

Basyal said there was extensive participation from school and college students, some in their uniforms. “Surprisingly, I did not see any affiliation related to any political parties,” he said.

What is behind Nepal’s Gen Z protest?

Growing dissatisfaction among the youth with corruption in the country materialised into the demonstration on Monday.

Basyal said the protests were fuelled by incidents of corruption in recent years “that get regularly talked about in public, in Parliament, but never seem to reach a fair conclusion”.

These include a 2017 Airbus deal, in which Nepal Airlines bought two A330 wide-body jets. A five-year-long inquiry, conducted by the Commission for the Investigation of Abuse of Authority (CIAA), a watchdog appointed under the country’s constitution, revealed last year that the deal led to a loss of 1.47 billion rupees ($10.4m) to the exchequer. Several top officials were convicted of corruption following the inquiry.

Protests in Sri Lanka and Bangladesh — which led to the removal of governments in the South Asian countries in 2022 and 2024, respectively — served as inspirations, Basyal said. In the Philippines, images of children of public figures enjoying lavish lifestyles have also drawn social media criticism recently. That also motivated protests in the Himalayan nation, Basyal added, as videos emerged on TikTok showing children of Nepalese politicians living lives of luxury in a country where the per capita income is $1,300 a year.

Ankit Bhandari, a 23-year-old student in Kathmandu who was present at the protest site, told Al Jazeera that the protest seemed to stem from the “frustration of having to pay tax” with no “proper documentation” of how it was being utilised.

The government’s September 4 announcement that it was blocking several social media platforms, including Facebook, added to the anger.

“The protests are fuelled by the frustration of youth and their disbelief in authority, as they feel sidelined from decision-making,” Yog Raj Lamichhane, an assistant professor at the School of Business in Nepal’s Pokhara University, told Al Jazeera.

“While the recent ban on social media platforms has added fuel to the unrest, the grievances extend far deeper, rooted in longstanding neglect and the silencing of youth voices.”

Hami Nepal, a nonprofit organisation that began as a youth movement in 2015, organised Monday’s protest. According to the Kathmandu District Administration Office, the organisation had secured approval for it.

“At the core of their demands lies a call for the rule of law, where fairness, accountability, and justice prevail over favouritism and corruption,” Lamichhane said.

The government blocked 26 social media platforms, including WhatsApp, Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn and YouTube.

The ban came into effect after one week was given to these social media websites to register with the Nepali government. The websites had until September 3 to register with the Ministry of Communications and Information Technology.

To avoid being shut down in the country, the websites had to name a local contact, a grievance handler and a person responsible for self-regulation.

A day after the deadline, the government issued a directive to the regulator, Nepal Telecommunications Authority (NTA), to shut down the websites that did not comply. An unnamed ministry official told the Reuters news agency that some platforms, including TikTok, Viber, and WeTalk, had registered with the government.

According to the government, users with fake IDs on these platforms are committing malicious acts and cybercrime, disrupting social harmony. About 90 percent of Nepal’s 30 million people use the internet, according to a 2021 NTA report.

As of 2021, about 7.5 percent of Nepal’s population was living abroad, reliant on platforms such as Meta’s Messenger to communicate with families back home. Many Nepalis have switched to Viber to communicate with their families and friends who are working abroad as migrant workers.

“It was abrupt,” and in a country with a large population overseas, was “frustrating,” Basyal said.

What is the latest on the ground?

The Kathmandu District Administration Office imposed a curfew in and around the New Baneshwor area, some 3km (about 2 miles) from Maitighar.

This happened after some protesters broke barricades set up by the police and entered the Parliament premises in New Baneshwor.

The curfew order, signed by Chief District Officer Chhabilal Rijal, bars gatherings in and around the area effective 12:30pm (06:45 GMT) to 10pm (16:15 GMT) on Monday.

The curfew was extended to other areas of Kathmandu, including the presidential residence — known as Rastrapati Bhawan or Shital Niwas — and the vice president’s residence in Lainchaur. The president’s residence is 6.3km (3.9 miles) from Maitighar, while the vice president’s residence is about 4.3km (2.7 miles) from the original protest location.

Police used tear gas and water cannon on the protesters. The demonstrators hit back with tree branches and water bottles, local media reported. According to a message on NGO Hami Nepal’s communication channel, authorities fired rubber bullets at the protesters.

Basyal said he “saw people get hit with rubber bullets, and were bleeding, being carried to the ambulances”. He said tear gas and water cannon were used to disperse protesters.

Fourteen people were killed after the police opened fire on the protesters. The deceased have not been identified. The Kathmandu Post reported that they succumbed to their injuries while receiving treatment at Civil Hospital and National Trauma Centre.

Local news outlets also reported that dozens of protesters were injured in the firing and were receiving treatment in different hospitals in Kathmandu, including Civil Hospital and Everest Hospital.

Distraction 101: Blow them up

On September 2, the United States conducted a sensational military strike on a speedboat in the southern Caribbean Sea in violation of both international and US law. The extravagant attack killed 11 civilians on board, whom US President Donald Trump had magically intuited to be drug traffickers affiliated with Venezuela’s Tren de Aragua gang.

The spectacle was staged amid the ongoing deployment of US warships off the Venezuelan coast under the pretence of fighting “narcoterrorists” whose ringleader, according to the current Trumpian narrative, is Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro – no surprise given the country’s lengthy role as a thorn in the side of US imperialism.

Warning that such attacks would continue, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio explained that the interdiction of alleged drug boats simply does not work: “What will stop them is when you blow them up, when you get rid of them.”

Trump, meanwhile, remarked on the ensuing decrease in boat traffic near the site of the strike, perhaps due to the fact that people who fish for a living now fear for their lives: “I don’t even know about fishermen. They may say, ‘I’m not getting on the boat. I’m not going to take a chance.’”

As with most situations in which the US claims to be fighting terror, then, this episode appeared to be rather terroristic in nature – particularly given the president’s own insinuation that fishermen or anyone else on a boat could be indiscriminately targeted at any time.

On September 5, the global hegemon’s enlightened commander-in-chief signed an executive order renaming the US Department of Defense the “Department of War”. This from a president who campaigned on, you know, keeping the US out of wars.

With his signature eloquence, Trump announced that the name change would wrest the US out of a supposedly “woke” orientation that precluded decisive victories and usher in an era of military triumph: “We could have won every war, but we really chose to be very politically correct or woke-y.”

Never mind that “politically correct” is not exactly the first descriptor that comes to mind when considering the mass US military slaughter of civilians in Afghanistan, Iraq and beyond. US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, who will henceforth be referred to as the “secretary of war”, concurred that the rebranding is necessary for “restoring the warrior ethos”.

But why the sudden need on Trump’s part to project a warrior image by blowing up a speedboat in the Caribbean? To put it briefly, it serves as a convenient distraction from the president’s dismal failure on other fronts to live up to his super-tough-guy vision of himself.

His ultimatums to Russian President Vladimir Putin to end the war in Ukraine, for example, have proved fruitless. Ditto for intermittent pressure on Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to wrap up the genocide in the Gaza Strip, where in less than two years Israel has officially killed more than 64,000 Palestinians, most of them women and children.

So why not hone the “warrior ethos” against easier targets – which may or may not include Caribbean fishermen?

Of course, this is not the first time Trump has put Venezuela in his crosshairs. In 2019, during his first presidential term, his administration took the liberty of recognising Juan Guaido, the little-known right-wing character who had spontaneously declared himself interim president of Venezuela, hypothetically replacing Maduro.

Things didn’t go quite as planned and Guaido ended up in Miami – but perhaps US warships surrounding Venezuela will help speed regime change along.

Nor, to be sure, is this the first time the US has used the old drug war as an excuse to kill civilians abroad, a hypocritical arrangement of particularly sinister proportions given that the US itself has been up to its ears in the global drug trade since pretty much forever.

As for the concept of “narcoterrorism” presently being invoked by Trump, this dates back to the 2006 renewal of the Patriot Act after the US Drug Enforcement Agency, fearful of losing its relevance in the whole “war on terror” era, proposed the new crime as a “pre-eminent threat” to the homeland.

So while Trump’s Caribbean showdown is not exactly a deviation from past US policy, his quest to perfect the art of total derangement does make for a somewhat unique display.

Thus far, the Trump administration has refrained from offering any evidence of Maduro’s alleged narcotrafficking ties. But, hey, evidence is just a “woke-y” thing, right?

At the end of the day, though, it’s not really about Maduro or Venezuela. It’s about Trump’s need to project power by blowing stuff up.

In August, Trump staged a summit in Alaska with Putin, ostensibly to end the war in Ukraine but really to distract from MAGA infighting – including on the subject of Netanyahu’s insistence on continuing to blow stuff up in Gaza.

Now, Venezuela is serving as the chosen distraction from the president’s weak showing against both Putin and Netanyahu as well as a venue for the general recuperation of a testosterone-fuelled “warrior ethos”.

And as the new Department of War proceeds to blow up international and domestic law along with a Caribbean motorboat, it’s more than just the fishermen who need to worry.

Typhoon Tapah makes landfall in China, prompting mass evacuations, closures

Tens of thousands of people have been evacuated as Typhoon Tapah has made landfall in southern China, causing flight disruptions and school closures.

State broadcaster CCTV said the storm made landfall on Monday morning in the city of Taishan in Guangdong province, unleashing powerful winds and torrential rain.

Recommended Stories

list of 2 itemsend of list

The Guangdong Meteorological Bureau raised a yellow alert, the third highest in China’s four-tier warning system, and forecast thunderstorms and gale-force winds.

Authorities said an estimated 60,000 people have been evacuated across southern China before the storm came ashore with maximum winds of 108 kilometres per hour (67 miles per hour).

Guangdong’s Emergency Management Department ordered the suspension of all outdoor activities and closed recreational areas like parks and beaches. Schools were also closed.

Guangdong has been hit by 16 typhoons this year. Tapah is expected to move northwest, gradually losing power until it exits the province.

In Taishan, classes were suspended for 120,000 students at schools and kindergartens across the city as an estimated 41,000 people in Jiangmen were evacuated. Chinese state media reported that 3,300 emergency personnel were on standby in the city.

The southern cities of Jiangmen, Maoming and Zhuhai also raised typhoon warnings and announced school closures.

In Hong Kong, a major regional economic hub, hundreds of flights were cancelled, and travellers were stranded at the airport awaiting information on when flights would continue. Macao, a nearby casino hub, also ordered the closure of its schools, public transport and taxis and reported disruptions to flights.

In the neighbouring city of Yangjiang, just west of Hong Kong, an estimated 1,785 workers were evacuated from 26 offshore wind platforms along with 2,026 people from fish farms.

‘Intense’ monsoon rain, flooding continue to engulf Pakistan’s Punjab

New evacuation orders have been issued in low-lying areas of Pakistan’s Punjab province amid a heavy flood warning, with the region experiencing its worst flooding on record.

The Pakistan Meteorological Department posted on X on Monday that rains were persisting across the country as “another intense monsoon system is expected to bring exceptional downpours in southern parts during the next two days”.

Recommended Stories

list of 3 itemsend of list

It added that “widespread heavy to very heavy rain thundershowers accompanied by windstorms” were expected to hit areas on Monday.

With an evacuation order issued to communities near the swollen Chenab, Sutlej, and Ravi rivers, Al Jazeera’s Kamal Hyder, reporting from Multan in Punjab, explained that the situation was “not under control”.

“We have reports from early this morning that Jalalpur Pirwala, which is 90km [56 miles] from Multan … that half a million people are stuck after the water inundated their villages; some of them are seeking protection under rooftops,” he said.

“There aren’t sufficient boats to evacuate these people. Helicopter operations have been called in, but the weather is also not good,” he added.

With the rain continuing, Hyder stressed that the situation was a “huge calamity” with villages and houses destroyed, but also the country now having to reel from losing crops due to the destruction of farmland.

In Multan, located between the Sutlej and Chenab rivers, floodwaters have breached at least three embankments, inundating dozens of villages.

Jalalpur Pirwala has been among the worst-hit places, with floodwaters submerging homes, farmland, and standing crops.

At least five people were killed on Saturday when a rescue boat carrying 30 people capsized near Multan.

Meanwhile, India alerted Pakistan of high floods on the Sutlej River on Sunday, warning that the monsoon rain would affect downstream districts.

New Delhi has been relaying such warnings through diplomatic channels rather than through the Indus Waters Treaty, which governed water sharing between the neighbouring countries, after India left the agreement in April following an attack on Indian-administered Kashmir that resulted in the deaths of 26 tourists, which India blames on Pakistan.

Pacific Islands leaders meet with climate change, security on agenda

In the Solomon Islands, where the Pacific Island leaders are scheduled to hold their annual summit, climate change and security are expected to take center stage as China and the United States battle for control of the area.

The group’s small island states meet for a meeting on Monday, which started the week-long gathering in Honiara.

Recommended Stories

list of 4 itemsend of list

On Thursday, the 18-member forum’s leaders, including Australia and New Zealand, will retreat to Munda, a coastal town.

After the Solomon Islands banned those observers due to a dispute over Taipei’s attendance, the summit will this year take place without the two dozen donor partners, including China, the US, and Taiwan.

Three of the 18 forum members have diplomatic relations with Taiwan, three have US defense agreements, and several are French-territorians. There are ties to China between 19 of the members.

The Pacific Islands Forum’s secretary-general, Divavesi Waqa, stated that this year’s meeting will address “regional priorities,” including “climate change, ocean governance, security, and] economic resilience.

These are more than just policy issues, they say. Waqa told reporters on Sunday that they are lived realities for the people of our country.

The meeting’s theme, “Lumi Tugeda: Act Now for an Integrated Blue Pacific Continent,” according to Solomon Islands Prime Minister Jeremiah Manele, “reflects the urgent need for regional unity and action.”

According to a statement, Manele said, “If ever there was a time that required stronger Pacific regionalism and collective action, it is now.”

After being critical of his predecessor’s close ties with China by Western critics, the leader of the Solomon Islands has previously defended his decision to outlaw foreign observers.

As the forum updates its rules for non-member participation, Manele told the Australian Broadcasting Corporation (ABC) last month.

According to reports that the decision was related to a decision not to include Taiwan in this year’s meeting, the Pacific region must always lead, drive, and own their own agenda, Manele said.

He claimed that “we are not under any external forces.”

Solomon Islands is a sovereign country, so let me be very clear. Our government serves the interests of our country and the region.

The Pacific Islands leaders are expected to sign the proposed “Ocean of Peace” Declaration at this year’s forum, which is being signed by Fiji’s Prime Minister Sitiveni Rabuka, who said it comes as the region has experienced “catastrophic calamities caused by climate change” as well as “its rich resources exploited by many”.

According to him, the proposal includes guiding principles like “peaceful resolution of disputes” and “rejection of coercion,” as well as “protecting and recognising the Pacific’s stewardship of the environment.”

After visiting Vanuatu, Australia’s prime minister is expected to sign a landmark agreement to strengthen economic and security ties on Wednesday.

The United Nations’ top court recently ruled that states must immediately act urgently to address the “existential threat” of climate change by cooperating to reduce emissions, leading Vanuatu to lead an important case before the International Court of Justice.

In light of criticism of Canberra’s lackluster record on reducing its own emissions and fossil fuel exports, Australia will be on the agenda in Honiara to host the COP31 climate change meeting next year. This is a Pacific COP.

Australia has previously pledged to work closely with its island neighbors to raise awareness of the challenges that rising sea levels and storms pose to them.

Shooting in occupied East Jerusalem kills five, Israeli authorities say

Developing a Story
As the Israeli military’s punishing assault on besieged Gaza rages, five people have been killed in a shooting attack in occupied East Jerusalem, according to Israeli authorities.

Six of the injured were in “serious condition” and received gunshot wounds following the shooting at Ramot Junction, according to Israeli paramedics’ Magen David Adom, in addition to the 12 others who were injured in the attack on Monday morning. Several others were “lightly injured by glass” and treated at the scene, according to Magen David Adom.

The shooting was deemed a “terror attack,” according to Israeli police.

Soon after the shooting broke out, two attackers were “neutralized,” according to police. According to Israeli police, a security officer and a civilian shot and killed the attackers of the attack that claimed the lives of five people in occupied East Jerusalem.

According to the police, the bus station was opened to fire when the perpetrators arrived in a car.

Following an attack that left five people dead in occupied East Jerusalem and the West Bank, Israeli forces have closed all checkpoints, according to sources who spoke to Al Jazeera.

Israeli Army Radio reported that Israeli forces erected a military cordon on four Palestinian villages in the territory’s Qatana, Biddu, Beit Inan, and Beit Duqu governorates and are conducting raids there after police claimed the perpetrators had been from the occupied West Bank.

The Israeli military announced that it had expanded its forces in the greater Jerusalem region and was looking for what it called “accomplices” of the shooting’s perpetrators.

On September 8, 2025, Israeli forces gather by a body in front of a bus in occupied East Jerusalem.

According to Al Jazeera’s Hamdah Salhut, who is based in Amman, Jordan, Israeli authorities claim that the two attackers are from a region west of occupied East Jerusalem in the occupied West Bank. They claim that the two gunmen both opened fire on the same day that two gunmen boarded a bus, one of whom witnesses claimed was a ticket inspector.

The Green Line actually bleeds into occupied East Jerusalem if you look at the location where it appears on a map, which is located close to the illegal settlement of Ramot, north of West Jerusalem. She continued, “These settlements are deemed illegal by international law, and they constitute structures and buildings that violate Palestinians’ rights and threaten the territorial stability of a future Palestinian state.”

According to Salhut, “Israeli officials are now trying to wrap their heads around how exactly this happened,” adding that they haven’t seen anything like it in a while and that the last time there was a shooting like this in greater Jerusalem occurred in November 2023.

doubts an attack was ordered by Hamas.

In addition, according to Israel Hayom newspaper, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu informed judges that security developments had prevented him from appearing for his scheduled Monday corruption trial.

The shooting’s location has been visited by both Netanyahu and Israel’s far-right Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir.

According to Israeli political analyst Ori Goldberg, the shooting attack was most likely to have taken place in the West Bank rather than Hamas in Gaza.

Goldberg told Al Jazeera that he “seriously” doubted whether Hamas had ordered it when he spoke from Tel Aviv.