WHO says US ending mRNA vaccine contracts a ‘significant blow’

The decision by US President Donald Trump’s administration to terminate 22 federal contracts for mRNA-based vaccines is a major blow to a hugely promising platform, the World Health Organization said.

“This is, of course, a significant blow,” WHO immunisation figurehead Joachim Hombach told the UN correspondents’ association ACANU on Thursday.

The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) announcement that it will wind down mRNA vaccine development activities under its biomedical research unit is the latest development under US Health Secretary Robert F Kennedy Jr, a long-time vaccine sceptic who has been making sweeping changes to reshape vaccines, food and medicine policies.

“mRNA vaccines are a very important technology and platform which has served us extremely well for COVID. We also know there is very promising work going on in relation to influenza vaccines,” Hombach said. “From our perspective, the platform is particularly useful in relation to developing vaccines against emerging and pandemic threats, because these platforms can be very rapidly adapted.”

Unlike traditional vaccines, which often use weakened or inactivated forms of the target virus or bacteria, mRNA shots deliver genetic instructions into the host’s cells, prompting them to produce a harmless decoy of the pathogen and train the immune system to fight the real thing.

The US health department’s Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority is “terminating 22 mRNA vaccine development investments because the data show these vaccines fail to protect effectively against upper respiratory infections like COVID and flu”, Kennedy said.

Hombach, executive secretary for the WHO’s strategic advisory group of experts on immunisation, called for work on the development of mRNA vaccines to continue around the world.

“This is, from our perspective, an unfortunate and untimely move, but we are confident that the research endeavour will continue because it’s an extremely promising technology,” he told reporters.

Shortly after his inauguration in January, Trump signed an executive order directing the United States to withdraw from the WHO, an organisation he has repeatedly criticised over its handling of the COVID-19 pandemic.

The Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority helps companies develop medical supplies to address public health threats, and had provided billions of dollars for the development of vaccines during the COVID-19 pandemic.

HHS said the wind-down includes cancellation of a contract awarded to Moderna MRNA.O for the late-stage development of its bird flu vaccine for humans and the right to buy the shots, as previously reported in May.

The US health agency said it was also rejecting or cancelling multiple pre-award solicitations, including proposals from Pfizer PFE.N, Sanofi Pasteur SASY.PA, CSL Seqirus CSL.AX, Gritstone and others.

Kennedy said the department is terminating these programmes because data show these vaccines “fail to protect effectively against upper respiratory infections like COVID and flu,” but did not offer scientific evidence.

“We’re shifting that funding toward safer, broader vaccine platforms that remain effective even as viruses mutate,” Kennedy said.

In total, the decision affects 22 projects worth nearly $500m, the agency said.

Cambodia and Thailand agree to deploy ASEAN ceasefire monitors

A fragile ceasefire that put an end to five days of deadly border clashes last month has been approved by Cambodia and Thailand to allow ASEAN observers to monitor.

Four days of talks between Cambodia’s Tea Seiha and Thailand’s acting defense minister Nattaphon Narkphanit were concluded on Thursday in Kuala Lumpur with a joint pledge to keep a freeze on border troop movements and patrols.

The two nations have had decades of fighting over their 817 km (508 miles) undefined land border, with the most recent conflict arising from a landmine explosion that injured five Thai soldiers last month, which resulted in the deaths of at least 43 people.

In a joint statement from the so-called General Border Committee, each nation will establish its own interim observer team led by current chair Malaysia, which will coordinate the deployment of a formal observer mission.

In a statement on Thursday, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio said the developments were an “important step forward in solidifying the ceasefire arrangement and establishing the ASEAN observation mechanism.”

Rubio stated, “President Trump and I demand that Cambodia’s and Thailand’s governments fully fulfill their commitments to end this conflict.”

Donald Trump, the president of the United States, had warned the nations that he would not enter trade agreements with them if the fighting persisted, prompting the July 28 ceasefire. Beginning this month, Washington gradually lowered tariffs on goods between the two nations from 36% to 19%.

Trump was nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize by Cambodian Prime Minister Hun Manet on Thursday, lauding him for his “extraordinary statesmanship” and “visionary and innovative diplomacy” in a letter to the Norwegian Nobel Committee.

He claimed that this timely intervention, which prevented a potentially devastating conflict, had a significant impact on the prevention of significant casualties and helped pay for the return of peace.

Shaky deal

In the first few days following its implementation, Thailand and Cambodia initially raised accusations that they had broken international humanitarian law and had violated the agreement.

The issue of 18 Cambodian soldiers who were taken just hours after the ceasefire was in effect continues to be a sticking point despite the fact that both sides have since extended the flimsy agreement.

Thailand had accused Cambodia of treating the men who were initially numbered 20 and had had two of the injured members repatriated on Friday. Authorities in Thailand called the group “prisoners of war” and said they would only be freed and repatriated once the conflict had ended.

Although the joint statement did not specifically address them, it stated that the captives should be “immediately released and repatriated after active hostilities have ended.”

At least six killed, two injured in medical plane crash in Kenya

At least six people have died and two have been hurt when an air ambulance crashed into a residential area close to Nairobi, according to a local official.

The mid-size jet made its way to Somaliland on Thursday shortly after 3:00 pm (12:00 GMT), leaving Wilson Airport at 2: 17 pm local time (11: 17 GMT).

According to Kiambu County Commissioner Henry Wafula, “we lost four people, including the pilot,” it was all fatal.

He claimed that two people on the ground had been “seriously injured” and that the house it landed on had also perished.

Large crowds had gathered at the scene, according to images captured by AFP news agency reporters who were there by the rescue teams from Kenya Red Cross and first responders sifting through the discarded debris.

Tasha Wanjira, a resident, reported to AFP that the plane “started to burn while in the air.” It then slammed down into the small community.

Irene Wangui, a resident, described how the plane “passed by our building shaking it” and claimed that there were body parts all over the place when it came down.

Residents cried as neighbors comforted them as dusk fell as hundreds of people watched the rescuers.

Margaret Wairimu, who weeped over her destroyed home, told AFP, “I have lost everything, thank God my children were not around.”

Stephen Gitau, the CEO of Amref Flying Doctors, confirmed that a Cessna Citation XLS aircraft had been “involved in a fatal accident today,” but he would not provide further information.

Gitau stated that the company was paying close attention to “the safety and well-being of those on board” and that additional details would be provided “as it is confirmed.”

In a statement, Amref stated that it was “cooperating fully with relevant aviation authorities and emergency response teams to establish the facts surrounding the situation.”

Police raid Kashmir bookshops after India bans titles for ‘secessionism’

Authorities in the troubled Muslim-majority region of India have since banned 25 books from booksellers in the region, saying that works like those by Booker Prize-winning author Arundhati Roy propagate “false narratives” and “secessionism.”

Police said they conducted additional searches of roadside book vendors and other businesses in the main city of Srinagar and other locations in the area to seize the prohibited literature in accordance with the order. Officials didn’t, however, specify whether they had seized any of the above.

In a social media statement, police said that the operation targeted materials that promoted secessionist ideologies or glorified terrorism. To advance peace and integrity, “public cooperation is sought.”

The government launched the raids after the authors were accused of spreading “false narratives” about Kashmir, “while also playing a crucial role in misdirecting the youth” against the Indian state.

Following a similar directive in February, authorities on Thursday also seize Islamic literature from bookshops and homes.

Since 1947, when India and Pakistan have dissolved their country, Kashmir has been divided. Both parties fully claim the Himalayan region.

Since 1989, rebel groups have fought for Kashmir’s independence or its fusion with Pakistan.

Indian authorities have increasingly criminalized dissent and shown no tolerance for any claims that raise questions of Kashmir’s sovereignty.

The Home Department of the region issued the order banning the books on Tuesday, marking the six-year anniversary of New Delhi’s introduction of direct rule, but it took some time to get the ban across.

The ban places sanctions on people who, among other things, sell or own works by constitutional expert AG Noorani and renowned academics and historians like Sumantra Bose, Christopher Snedden, and Victoria Schofield.

The 25 books were effectively prohibited from circulation, possession, and access within the Himalayan region because of the order’s new criminal code of 2023, which declares the 25 books “forfeit.”

According to the Press Trust of India news agency, Bose, a political scientist and author whose book Kashmir at the Crossroads was one of the banned works, “any and all defamatory slurs” were being rejected on his work.

Since 1993, I have worked on Kashmir, among other subjects, including many. My top priority has always been to find peaceful ways for the people of the conflict region, India as a whole, and the subcontinent to enjoy a stable future free of fear and war.

He declared, “I am a committed and principled advocate of peaceful solutions and armed conflict resolutions, whether in Kashmir or elsewhere in the world.”

The ban also included Roy’s 2020 book of essays Azadi: Freedom, Fascism, Fiction.

Although Roy, 63, is one of India’s most well-known living authors, is notorious for her writing and activism, including her incisive criticism of Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s administration.

Siddiq Wahid, a historian, claimed that the edict, which “allows the freedoms of speech and expression,” is in violation of the constitution.

Many of the books listed on the list of prohibited books are those that are written and published by individuals and organizations whose reputations depend on the availability of proof, logic, and arguments for the conclusions they draw, Wahid told the AFP news agency. Does anything still be taken into account for that?

In its first election since New Delhi’s direct control of the region’s assembly, voters in India-administered Kashmir elected a new government in September and October.

However, the territory is still governed by a New Delhi-appointed administrator despite having a limited amount of authority within the local government.

The ban, according to chief cleric and separatist leader Mirwaiz Umar Farooq, “only exposes the insecurities and limited understanding of those behind such authoritarian actions.”

On the social media platform X, Farooq stated that “bannning books by scholars and reputed historians will not erase historical facts and the collection of lived memories of Kashmiris.”

Tougher transshipment penalties on US imports not immediate: Report

Three people in Southeast Asia who are aware of the situation said that it is anticipated that tougher US trade sanctions on goods that come from one country and are re-shipped from another will not immediately follow new US tariffs, which eases a major source of concern.

Southeast Asian nations, including Vietnam and Thailand, have been specifically targeted by White House officials because of their alleged involvement in facilitating the so-called transshipment of Chinese goods into the US, which would incur higher tariffs if they were shipped directly from China.

From Thursday through to the end of an executive order, US President Donald Trump’s administration will impose tariffs on goods from dozens of nations, causing additional duties of 40% on products deemed to have been illegally rerouted to conceal their country of origin. However, it did not provide a definition for transshipment.

About 19% of the largest economies in Southeast Asia’s are now subject to tariffs, many of which have significantly decreased from the previously threatened rates, on imports from the US.

Even if the components are entirely imported from another country, such as China, according to current US customs guidance, goods from those nations that have not signed free trade agreements with Washington can be labelled as being made there.

Some officials in Southeast Asia have informed exporters that the current regulations still apply because there are no updated US guidelines on origin or definitions of what transshipment means.

That effectively limits transshipment&nbsp cases to illegal activities, such as the use of forged export certificates or documents obtained defrauded.

Because there aren’t any regulations in place for transshipment yet, the Thai Ministry of Commerce’s Department of Foreign Trade, Arada Fuangtong, told Reuters on Thursday. “All exported goods] from Thailand are currently subject to a 19 percent rate.”

According to a person with knowledge of the conversation, US officials in Vietnam also stated that businessmen would be subject to a 20% tariff on Vietnamese goods even if they were entirely made with Chinese components and only assembled there.

Before the new wave of US tariffs, trade consultants advised clients to export at least 40% of local content to the US, despite the fact that the rules are vague. One of them said that meant to be on the safe side.

A request for comment was not immediately addressed by the US embassy in Vietnam. A request for comment outside of US working hours was not immediately addressed by the US Trade Representative.

A consultant from Vietnam said that “goods that are defined by US customs as transshipped are subject to 40 percent duties, but that is only applicable to old definitions” .

In order to speak more freely, both people declined to be named.

China’s dependence

Repackaging typically doesn’t lead to a “substantial transformation,” but assembly may, depending on how complex the operations are.

If other nations can follow this lenient interpretation of transshipment, it’s not clear if it will.

The economic ministries of Indonesia, Malaysia, the Philippines, Vietnam, and Singapore did not respond to requests for comment on the situation right away.

Southeast Asian manufacturers, which rely heavily on Chinese components, have been unsure of what transshipment would mean in Washington for months.

Even when goods are legitimately transformed in Southeast Asian countries, there are still questions about whether that would include goods with a sizable, but undefined, share of components or raw materials.

Multiple investment consultants warned that a strict definition of transshipment and &nbsp might come later.

According to an executive order signed by Trump last week, the US will “publish a list of nations and specific facilities used in circumvention schemes every six months.”

That will “inform commercial due diligence, national security reviews, and public procurement,” it said.

Dezan Shira and Associates, an investment consultancy, said Marco Forster, director for Southeast Asia, “the message from Washington is deterrence.”