World reacts as UN-backed body declares famine in Gaza

According to a global hunger monitor supported by the UN, Gaza City and its surrounding areas are currently experiencing famine, which is likely to spread throughout the region.

On Friday, the Integrated Food Security Phase Classification (IPC) system said 514, 000 people, close to a quarter of Palestinians in Gaza, are experiencing famine, with the number due to rise to 641, 000 by the end of September.

This comes after 22 months of conflict, during which Israeli forces have occupied the Strip, obliterated infrastructure, impeded aid arrival, and targeted and killed desperate Palestinians seeking food.

The global group has predicted that by the end of the month, famine conditions would be present in the central and southern regions of Deir el-Balah and Khan Younis, making this the first time the IPC has documented famine outside of Africa.

Here’s how global leaders and NGOs are reacting to the IPC report:

Nations Unified

UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres referred to the famine in Gaza as a “man-made disaster, a moral indictment, and a failure of humanity itself,” according to Guterres.

“Famine is not only about food, it is the deliberate collapse of the systems needed for human survival”, Guterres said. “People are starving,” he said. Children are euthanizing. And those with the duty to act are failing”.

The UN chief noted that Israel, the occupying power, has “unequivocal obligations” under international law, including the obligation to ensure that Gaza’s population receives food and medical supplies.

UNRWA’s head of UNRWA, Philippe Lazzarini, has stated that “months of warnings have fallen on deaf ears,” but that it is “time for political will” to put an end to the famine in Gaza City and the surrounding areas.

“We cannot allow this situation to continue with impunity”, he said. No more excuses,” Not tomorrow, but right now is the moment to take action.

UN aid chief Tom Fletcher said the famine has been “openly promoted by some Israeli leaders as a weapon of war” and called on Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to “end the retribution” and open Gaza’s crossings for unrestricted access.

Israel

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu criticized the UN-backed declaration that Gaza had a famine outbreak.

In a statement from his office, Netanyahu said, “The IPC report is an outright lie.

He added that “Israel does not have a policy of starvation”, citing the delivery of humanitarian aid into the Gaza Strip during the war.

In May, the controversial Israel- and US-backed GHF took over all food aid distribution in Gaza. More than 2, 000 aid seekers have been killed since then, according to Gaza’s health ministry.

Hamas

Palestinian group Hamas called for an immediate end to the war and the lifting of the Israeli siege on the territory after the UN declared a famine in parts of Gaza.

The group demanded that crossings be opened “without restrictions to allow the urgent and continuous entry of food, medicine, water, and fuel,” in a statement released online.

The group continued, claiming that Israel had used starvation as a “tool of war” in response to the UN’s declaration that it had confirmed the “humanitarian catastrophe” in Gaza.

Palestinian Authority

The IPC report “closed the door to interpretation and speculative speculation regarding the occurrence of famine,” according to the Foreign Ministry of the PA, which governs portions of the occupied West Bank under Israeli control.

In a statement posted on social media, it stated that “it has confirmed that the mobilisation of international influence in all its forms and dimensions is necessary to put an end to famine and the aggression against our people.”

It also urged the UN Security Council and the international community “to address with utmost seriousness and concern” the contents of the report.

This indicates that the Israeli occupation is beginning to destroy all aspects of human life in the Gaza Strip and is using starvation as a means of fighting Palestinians.

Saudi Arabia

Saudi Arabia expressed concern after the IPC’s famine report and said that the worsening humanitarian conditions in Gaza “will remain a stain on the international community”.

The Saudi Foreign Ministry stated in a statement that the situation in Gaza is “a direct result of the lack of deterrence and accountability mechanisms” for the Israeli occupation’s repeated crimes.

It urged the UN Security Council to “quickly intervene immediately to put an end to the famine and put an end to Israel’s genocide and crimes against Palestine.”

Kuwait

Kuwait has denounced the “policy of starvation, oppression, and displacement” pursued by Israel against civilians in Gaza.

Israel’s policy is “in flagrant violation of international law and humanitarian law,” according to the nation’s foreign ministry in a statement. It also violates UN Security Council resolutions and international humanitarian law.

Kuwait also demanded that the UN Security Council and the international community “allow the immediate flow of humanitarian aid into the Gaza Strip, put an end to the brotherly Palestinian people, and hold the occupying power accountable for the crimes it commits against humanity.”

Gulf Cooperation Council

Secretary-General of the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC), Jasem Mohamed Albudaiwi, stressed the need for immediate action by the international community to pressure Israel to open the crossings and allow the entry of humanitarian aid into Gaza without restrictions.

Albudaiwi noted in a statement on Friday that the IPC’s official declaration of famine in the Gaza Strip, which has reached catastrophic levels, “clearly reflects the dangerous, inhumane, and illegal starvation policies pursued by the Israeli occupation forces against the brotherly Palestinian people in the Gaza Strip.”

United Kingdom

After the IPC declared the famine in Gaza, UK Foreign Secretary David Lammy described it as a “moral outrage” and a “man-made catastrophe.”

The famine’s confirmation in Gaza City and the surrounding neighborhood is “completely preventable” and “utterly horrifying,” Lammy said in a statement.

“The Israeli government’s refusal to allow sufficient aid into Gaza has caused this man-made catastrophe. This is wrong in terms of morality.

Red Cross

The International Committee of the Red Cross said Israel must meet the basic needs of Gaza’s civilians for food, water and medicine, following Friday’s “devastating and entirely foreseeable” IPC report.

Israel, the occupying power, “must use all the resources it has available to ensure that the basic needs of the civilian population of Gaza are met,” the ICRC stated in a statement. It added that the famine declaration “must serve as a catalyst for immediate and concrete action.”

Oxfam

Oxfam demanded that aid be immediately allowed into the area after the IPC’s declaration of a famine in Gaza City confirms what the charity and its partners have been seeing for months.

“The famine in Gaza is entirely driven by Israel’s near-total blockade on food and vital aid, the horrifying consequence of Israel’s violence, and its use of starvation as a weapon of war”, said Helen Stawski, policy lead at Oxfam GB, the global poverty-focused NGO’s British arm.

Israel has continued to deprive Palestinians of food despite warnings that a famine was about to break out in July, rejecting almost every request made by long-established humanitarian organizations, preventing them from delivering essential food and aid that could have reduced hunger, malnutrition, and disease.

She claimed that warehouses outside of Gaza held more than $3.3 million worth of aid, including high-calorie food packages.

“Israeli authorities have rejected it all, at a time when it is needed more than ever”, she said.

Islamic Relief

Islamic Relief, a humanitarian organization, called on the IPC to “bring shame on the entire world” as it confirmed the Gaza famine.

“Every day our team there sees more people starving to death and children turning into living skeletons before our eyes”, the NGO said in a statement.

“Many more will die unless the world stops now,” he says.

CAIR

The US Congress and President Donald Trump must now put an end to Washington’s unwavering support for Israel, according to the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR).

“This famine is not a natural disaster – it is the intended outcome of Israel’s brutal blockade, targeted destruction of food systems, and systematic obstruction of humanitarian aid. International aid organizations have been raising the alarm for months, according to CAIR on X.

Mercy Corps

The chief executive officer of the US-based aid group, Tjada D’Oyen McKenna, called the UN announcement of a famine in Gaza City “absolutely horrifying, yet not surprising”.

“This is the direct result of months of deliberate aid restrictions, the destruction of Gaza’s food, health, and water systems, and relentless bombardment,” the statement read. She claimed that this is a man-made catastrophe that can be avoided without ceasing to be.

McKenna said Mercy Corps staff were facing dire conditions.

US Open tennis 2025: Schedule, seeds, prize money, tickets and how to watch

The biggest names in tennis will look to see out 2025 in style and with a trophy in hand as the main round of the US Open gets under way on Sunday in New York.

The last Grand Slam of the year attracted extra eyeballs and controversy when it revamped the mixed doubles category this year, scheduling it a week earlier than the rest of the tournament and inviting top men’s and women’s singles players to team up for exhibition-style matches.

Here’s all you need to know about the US Open 2025:

When is US Open 2025 main round starting, and when are the finals?

The first round of men’s and women’s singles matches starts on Sunday, August 24.

The women’s singles final will be played at the Arthur Ashe Stadium on Saturday, September 6 and the men’s singles final will be played a day later.

Where is the US Open played?

The US edition of the Grand Slam tour is played on the hard courts of the USTA Billie Jean National Tennis Centre in Flushing Meadows, located in the Queens borough of New York City, New York.

Who are the favourites to win the US Open 2025?

An exciting mix of former champions and current top-ranked players count among the favourites to lift the title at the end of two weeks.

Jannik Sinner: The top-seeded and top-ranked player is also the defending champion, making him a clear favourite for his fifth Grand Slam title. Sinner has won two of this year’s three major’s titles, and while his injury-forced retirement in the final of the Cincinnati Open was a cause of concern, the Italian brushed it aside by taking part in a pre-tournament public practice session on Thursday.

Carlos Alcaraz: The Spaniard’s first Grand Slam title came in New York, and he will aim to repeat his feat from 2022 for his second major title of 2025 and tie the year with his modern-day tennis rival Sinner. Alcaraz has a 54-6 win-loss record and comes to New York with the Cincinnati title in the bag, making the second seed a joint top favourite.

Taylor Fritz: The tall American has been knocking on the doors of Grand Slam finals for more than a year, and his closest shot came at his home major in 2024 when he lost to Sinner. The fourth seed will, once again, have the home crowd’s backing as he seeks his maiden major title on a surface he has previously thrived on.

Aryna Sabalenka: The defending champion has twice fallen at the last stretch of Grand Slams since winning the title in New York last September and will aim to finish the year with the high of a winner’s trophy to complement her top seeding. Sabalenka faces stiff competition from her contemporaries and her inability, in 2025, to cross the final hurdle, but will hope to overcome her blues on the blue courts of the US Open.

Coco Gauff: The French Open champion is an outright home favourite and will enjoy the unabashed support of the crowd at Flushing Meadows every time she steps on court. Besides her popularity, Gauff also has the pedigree to be counted among the favourites, having won the US Open in 2023 for her first major title, as well as her current ranking and seeding of three.

Iga Swiatek: The Polish player has been in scintillating form this year, having won Wimbledon and qualified for the mixed doubles final in New York on Wednesday. The second seed also won bronze at the 2024 Olympics and enters the tournament on the back of a hard-court title win in Cincinnati on Monday.

Coco Gauff will be among the home favourites at the US Open 2025 in New York City [Al Bello/Getty Images via AFP]

Who are the top seeds?

Men’s:

  1. Jannik Sinner
  2. Carlos Alcaraz
  3. Alexander Zverev
  4. Taylor Fritz
  5. Jack Draper
  6. Ben Shelton
  7. Novak Djokovic
  8. Alex de Minaur
  9. Karen Khachanov
  10. Lorenzo Musetti

Women’s:

  1. Aryna Sabalenka
  2. Iga Swiatek
  3. Coco Gauff
  4. Jessica Pegula
  5. Mirra Andreeva
  6. Madison Keys
  7. Jasmine Paolini
  8. Amanda Anisimova
  9. Elena Rybakina
  10. Emma Navarro
NEW YORK, NEW YORK - AUGUST 21: Jannik Sinner of Italy returns a ball during a practice session ahead of the 2025 US Open at USTA Billie Jean King National Tennis Center on August 21, 2025 in the Queens borough of New York City. Sarah Stier/Getty Images/AFP (Photo by Sarah Stier / GETTY IMAGES NORTH AMERICA / Getty Images via AFP)
Jannik Sinner is the top-ranked and -seeded player in the men’s singles draw at the US Open [Sarah Stier/Getty Images via AFP]

When are Alcaraz, Sinner, Sabalenka, Gauff and Djokovic playing their first game?

Women’s top seed and holder Sabalenka will begin her title defence at Arthur Ashe Stadium on Sunday, while her male counterpart Sinner will also be in action on the opening day.

The rest of the top picks, including five-time former champion Novak Djokovic, 2022 winner Carlos Alcaraz and home favourite Gauff are all set to begin their campaigns on the same day.

Can there be Sinner vs Alcaraz and Sabalenka vs Gauff US Open finals?

Yes, as these players have been placed in opposite halves of the draws. Sinner or Alexander Zverev could also face Djokovic or Fritz in the final, should they make it all the way through.

In the women’s draw, Sabalenka faces the possibility of a final against Gauff or Swiatek, who are in the same half of the women’s singles draw.

What was the controversy surrounding the mixed doubles at the US Open?

The tournament’s organisers changed things up in the mixed doubles category by scheduling it a week prior to the main singles’ draw and doing away with the doubles’ team rankings in order to qualify for the draw. Instead, top singles players were encouraged to team up on the basis of their singles’ ranking and by ensuring the matches do not clash with the singles draw.

This, however, led to a backlash by top-ranked doubles teams, who missed out on playing for the title as their doubles rankings were not considered. The top-ranked pairing of Sara Errani and Andrea Vavassori were handed a wildcard entry and ended up showing the singles stars how it is done by winning the mixed doubles title in a thrilling match against Iga Swiatek and Casper Ruud.

Italy's Andrea Vavassori (L) and Sara Errani celebrate after winning their mixed doubles final tennis match against Norway's Casper Ruud and Poland's Iga Swiatek at the US Open tennis tournament at the USTA Billie Jean King National Tennis Center in New York City, on August 20, 2025. (Photo by TIMOTHY A.CLARY / AFP)
Andrea Vavassori and Sara Errani celebrate after winning their mixed doubles final against Casper Ruud and Iga Swiatek [Timothy A Clary/AFP]

How to buy tickets the US Open 2025?

Tickets are up for grabs on the tournament’s official website.

How much is the prize money for the US Open 2025?

The total prize money on offer will be $90m, while the men’s and women’s singles champions will receive $5m each.

How to follow and livestream the US Open 2025?

The tournament will be shown by local and terrestrial broadcasters, as well as digital streaming services around the globe.

Trump threatens to fire US Fed Governor Lisa Cook

United States President Donald Trump says he will fire Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook if she doesn’t quit, intensifying his effort to gain influence over the central bank.

“I’ll fire her if she doesn’t resign”, Trump told reporters on Friday during a visit to a Washington, DC, museum focused on the White House.

Cook, the first Black woman to serve on the Federal Reserve’s Board of Governors, said she had “no intention of being bullied to step down” after Trump on Wednesday called for&nbsp, her resignation&nbsp, on the basis of allegations about mortgages she holds in Michigan and Georgia.

Cook on Wednesday said she took any questions about her financial history seriously as a member of the Fed’s board and was gathering accurate information to answer any legitimate questions.

Asked about the matter on Friday as she attended the Fed’s annual research conference in Jackson Hole, Wyoming, Cook said she had no further comment beyond her earlier statement.

Cook is among three Fed governors appointed by former President Joe Biden whose terms extend beyond Trump’s time in office, complicating the president’s efforts to gain more control by appointing a majority of the seven-member Board of Governors. Two of the Fed’s board members were appointed by Trump – Governor Christopher Waller and Vice Chairwoman for Supervision Michelle Bowman.

Trump has repeatedly criticised Fed Chairman Jerome Powell, whose term ends in May, first over his failure to reduce benchmark interest rates and more recently over cost overruns on a renovation of a Federal Reserve building.

US Federal Housing Finance Agency Director William Pulte raised the allegations against Cook in a post on X on Wednesday, saying she had designated a condo in Atlanta, Georgia, as her primary residence after taking out a loan on her home in Michigan, which she also declared as a primary residence. Pulte told CNBC he is also investigating property Cook has in Massachusetts.

Loans for a primary residence can carry easier terms than those for second homes or investment properties. Pulte said the loans in question date to mid-2021 before Cook was appointed to the Fed and confirmed by the Senate in 2022. Cook, a native of Georgia, was an economics professor at Michigan State University at the time the mortgages were taken out.

Pulte asked US Attorney General Pam Bondi to investigate, and Trump quickly amplified the allegation. The Department of Justice is taking the matter very seriously, a department official told the Reuters news agency earlier this week.

Allegations ‘ cobbled together ‘

Maxine Waters, the top Democrat on the US House of Representatives Committee on Financial Services, blasted Trump’s attack on Cook on Friday, saying in a statement that it was a clear continuation of his ongoing effort to “undermine the independence of the Federal Reserve” and deflect attention to signs of economic challenges caused by his policies.

“Their latest target is Dr. Lisa Cook, a highly qualified, trailblazing economist, and the first Black woman to serve on the Federal Reserve’s Board of Governors since Congress created it in 1913”, Waters said. “Let me be very clear, the allegations against Dr. Cook have been cobbled together as a pretext to try to replace her with someone who will be loyal first to Trump instead of the US Constitution or US law”.

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent is heading the effort to find a replacement for Powell.

Iran rejects sanctions threats before renewed nuclear talks with Europe

Iran and three major European powers have agreed to resume nuclear talks next week, even as the threat of revived sanctions looms.

Iranian state media reported on Friday that Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi held a call with his French, British and German counterparts, during which they agreed deputy ministers would meet on Tuesday.

German Foreign Minister Johann Wadephul confirmed the talks, warning that Europe was prepared to re-impose United Nations sanctions under the so-called “snapback” mechanism unless Iran committed to a verifiable and lasting deal. “Time is very short and Iran needs to engage substantively”, he said.

According to Iranian outlets, Araghchi rejected the threat, accusing the European trio of lacking “legal and moral competence” to trigger snapback sanctions and warning of consequences if they did so.

The three European governments, backed by the United States, have accused Tehran of advancing uranium enrichment in violation of international commitments and say its programme could be used to develop nuclear weapons.

Iran has said its work is strictly for civilian purposes, and Western governments have not provided any evidence that Tehran is weaponising its nuclear programme.

The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), the UN’s nuclear watchdog, has said Iran remains far from building a nuclear weapon. In March, US National Intelligence Director Tulsi Gabbard testified that intelligence agencies had found no evidence of Iran moving towards a bomb.

Talks between Iran and the US collapsed in June after Washington and Israel attacked Iranian nuclear sites during a 12-day conflict.

Since then, IAEA inspectors have not been allowed into Iran’s facilities, despite the agency’s chief, Rafael Grossi, stressing that inspections are essential.

President Masoud Pezeshkian has warned the IAEA to abandon its “double standards” if it hopes to restore cooperation over the country’s nuclear programme, amid an acute mistrust following Israeli and US attacks on Iranian nuclear sites, and the UN nuclear watchdog’s refusal to condemn the strikes.

In July, Pezeshkian signed a law suspending Iran’s cooperation with the IAEA, with Tehran making it clear that it no longer trusts the agency to act impartially.

Negotiations between Tehran and the Europeans last took place in Geneva on June 20, while the fighting was still under way. Little progress was reported at the time.

Why is there a rift in the US Republican Party?

This debate takes on the growing rift in President Trump’s party. Is it driven by conservative principles&nbsp, or allegiance to one man?

America First was the slogan Donald Trump championed during his re-election campaign as he promised to put the interests of Americans above those of foreign governments, immigrants and large corporations. However, the United States president has made several policy decisions that have divided his electoral base. The two guests in this episode of The Stream voted for Trump in the 2024 election but now find themselves on the opposite side of several issues: economic policy, foreign military spending and the Jeffrey Epstein files.

Presenter: Stefanie Dekker