Wrongfully deported Kilmar Abrego Garcia released from Tennessee jail

Kilmar Abrego Garcia, who was wrongfully deported by the administration of United States President Donald Trump, has been released from a jail in Tennessee.

Abrego Garcia was released on Friday and will rejoin his family in Maryland while he awaits the beginning of a trial based on allegations of human smuggling by the Trump administration, according to his lawyer.

The detention of Abrego Garcia, who remained held in an El Salvador prison known for abusive conditions even after the government admitted he had been mistakenly deported, became a flashpoint in the Trump administration’s push for mass deportations with little semblance of due process.

The government, faced with a court order, brought Abrego Garcia back to the US in June, despite previously claiming it had no authority to do so. Upon his return, the Trump administration announced criminal charges against him for alleged human smuggling.

Abrego Garcia, whom the Trump administration previously tried to link to the criminal group MS-13 through disproven claims, has denied the charges. His lawyers have depicted the criminal charges as a form of punishment for speaking out against his wrongful deportation and embarrassing the administration.

While he was previously cleared for pre-trial release from the Tennessee jail, his lawyers requested that he be allowed to remain there out of concern that the government would move to deport him again if he was released.

Those fears have slightly eased after a recent, separate court ruling that said the government must allow Abrego Garcia to challenge a deportation order. His lawyers filed a motion for dismissal of the criminal case, arguing that it is a form of retaliation from the government.

An immigration judge rejected Abrego Garcia’s application for asylum in 2019, but ruled that he could not be deported to El Salvador due to a “well-founded fear” of violence in that country.

Chicago ‘will be next’: Trump teases troop expansion in Democrat-led cities

President Donald Trump has hinted he plans to expand his domestic troop deployment to other Democrat-led cities in the United States, starting with the midwestern metropolis of Chicago, Illinois.

Trump’s warning arrived shortly after the Department of Defence confirmed to US media that the National Guard troops currently patrolling Washington, DC, will now be carrying weapons.

In a statement on Friday, the Pentagon said the decision came directly from Trump’s defence secretary, Pete Hegseth.

“Members supporting the mission to lower the crime rate in our Nation’s capital will soon be on mission with their service-issued weapons, consistent with their mission and training,” the statement said.

Trump had called up the National Guard on August 11 to address crime in Washington, DC, dismissing nonpartisan data from the Metropolitan Police Department that shows violent crime in the city at a 30-year low.

The city had seen an uptick in murder and other crimes after the COVID-19 pandemic began, but since 2023, violent crime has fallen by 35 percent, according to the police statistics.

Trump, however, renewed his attacks against the city’s leadership on Friday and once again threatened to take over the local government. He has already federalised the local police force, a power he can exert for a period of 30 days.

“It was a crime-infested rat hole, and they do have a lot of rats,” Trump said of Washington, DC, during a meeting with reporters and FIFA football federation president Gianni Infantino at the White House.

Threats against DC Mayor Bowser

He specifically called out Washington, DC, Mayor Muriel Bowser, a Democrat, warning she could lose her democratically elected post.

“I’m tired of listening to these people say how safe it was before we got here,” Trump said. “It was unsafe. It was horrible. And Mayor Bowser had better get her act straight, or she won’t be mayor very long because we’ll take it over with the federal government and run it like it’s supposed to be run.”

Critics have voiced concern that such a move would further disenfranchise the voters of Washington, DC, and legal experts warn that Trump may run afoul of the law if he attempts to seize control of the city.

The federal government already wields significant power over the affairs of the capital. But under the Home Rule Act of 1973, a local government — with a mayor and city council — was set up to manage the city’s day-to-day policies, though Congress retained the right to review and reject local laws.

It is not clear how Trump could singlehandedly overturn the Home Rule Act, barring an act of Congress.

Still, Washington, DC’s unique status as the nation’s capital has allowed Trump to deploy the National Guard more freely there than he could in other parts of the country.

Earlier this month, the Trump administration faced trial for its use of the National Guard to quell demonstrations last June in Los Angeles, California.

State and local officials have argued that the move not only violated the law, but also ignited tensions between protesters and law enforcement.

In explaining California’s case against the Trump administration, state Attorney General Rob Bonta cited the Posse Comitatus Act of 1878, which bars the use of the country’s military for domestic law enforcement.

“Two months ago, the federal government deployed military troops to the streets of Los Angeles for the purposes of political theater and public intimidation,” Bonta said in a news release. “This dangerous move has no precedent in American history.”

Expanding troop deployments to Chicago

But Trump has advanced the idea that he will continue to deploy the National Guard to other parts of the country, in the name of combating crime.

“After we do this, we’ll go to another location, and we’ll make it safe also. We’re going to make our country very safe. We’re going to make our cities very, very safe,” Trump said, before turning his attention to one city in particular.

“Chicago’s a mess. You have an incompetent mayor. Grossly incompetent. And we’ll straighten that one out probably next. That’ll be our next one after this. And it won’t even be tough.”

He also named other cities he would like to “clean up” with federal troop intervention.

“I think Chicago will be next, and then we’ll help with New York,” Trump said at one point on Friday. At another, he hinted he might be inclined to once again deploy the National Guard to California.

“Now, you look at what the Democrats have done to San Francisco; they’ve destroyed it,” Trump said. “It’s just different. We can clean that up, too. We’ll clean that one up, too.”

Any of those proposed efforts, should they materialise, would likely face challenges under the Posse Comitatus Act.

Already, some mayors have responded to the idea that their city could be the next stop for Trump’s anti-crime campaign.

“If President Trump wants to help make Chicago safer, he can start by releasing the funds for anti-violence programs that have been critical to our work to drive down crime and violence,” Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson said in a statement earlier this month.

“Sending in the national guard would only serve to destabilize our city and undermine our public safety efforts.”

As Trump faces the end of the 30-day window for his control of the Washington, DC, police force, he has indicated that he might try to circumvent the deadline by declaring the capital’s crime a “national emergency”.

“ I don’t know if there is a deadline because if I declare a national emergency, which this was, that ends the deadline,” Trump said.

Hungary, Slovakia fear oil cuts after Ukrainian attack on Russian pipeline

Following a Ukrainian strike on Russia’s Druzhba pipeline, Hungary and Slovakia have raised concerns about potential fuel shortages, warning that deliveries could be delayed for several days.

Officials from both nations issued a warning on Friday that the Unecha oil pumping station’s attack, a crucial hub in western Russia, could cause delays in supply for at least five days. Central Europe is primarily served by Russian oil’s crucial route through Belarus and Ukraine, which was constructed during the Soviet Union.

In a joint letter to the European Commission, Hungary’s Foreign Minister Peter Szijjarto and Slovakia’s Foreign Minister Juraj Blanar pleaded with Brussels to intervene and ensure secure energy flows. Without this pipeline, the supply of our nations would simply not be possible, according to them, both physically and geographically.

Viktor Orban, the prime minister of Hungary, released a letter he had written to US President Donald Trump that included the strike.

Orban claimed in it that Ukraine had attacked Druzhba just before Trump’s meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska, and that it was an “unfortunate” escalation.

Trump’s handwritten statement, “Viktor, I do not like hearing this, I am very angry about it,” appeared in a copy of the Facebook letter. There are no comments from the White House.

Energy security

Late on Thursday, Ukraine’s military confirmed that it had struck the Unecha facility, describing it as a crucial component of Russia’s export system.

Despite the location being independently verified, Robert Brovdi, the head of Ukraine’s unmanned systems forces, posted a video on Telegram of a massive blaze at an oil depot.

Following a second straight week of a halt on Monday and Tuesday, the strike severely affected oil deliveries to Hungary and Slovakia. Officials from Russia acknowledged that the Unecha fire had been extinguished, but that it could continue to flow for several days.

After the 2022 invasion, the European Union pledged to completely eliminate Moscow’s oil and gas by 2027. Hungary and Slovakia have resisted these actions, maintaining close ties with Vladimir Putin, the president of Russia, and preventing some sanctions that Kyiv claims are necessary to pressure Moscow.

Both Germany and Kazakhstan, which also use the Druzhba pipeline, reported that their supplies remained unaffected. Berlin confirmed that Kazakhstan’s oil flows had not been hampered while Bernin claimed that fuel deliveries to the capital’s PCK Schwedt refinery were safe.

Trump says US to take 10 percent stake in Intel

The United States government will take a 10 percent stake in Intel under an agreement with the struggling chipmaker, President Donald Trump has said, marking the latest extraordinary intervention in corporate affairs.

The US agreed to purchase a 9.9 percent stake in Intel for $8.9bn at a price of $20.47 a share, which is a discount of about $4 per share from Intel’s closing share price of $24.80 on Friday.

The government will buy the 433.3 million shares with funding from the $5.7bn in unpaid CHIPS Act grants and $3.2bn awarded to Intel for the Secure Enclave program.

Intel shares dropped 1.2 percent in extended trading on Friday.

Trump is set to meet CEO Lip-Bu Tan later on Friday, a White House official said.

The development follows a meeting between CEO Lip-Bu Tan and Trump earlier this month that was sparked by Trump’s demand for the Intel chief’s resignation over his ties to Chinese firms.

“He walked in wanting to keep his job, and he ended up giving us $10bn for the United States,” Trump said on Friday.

Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said on X that the deal had been completed. “The United States of America now owns 10% of Intel,” he wrote, saying Tan had struck a deal “that’s fair to Intel and fair to the American People.”

While Trump did not provide details on the $10bn, the equity stake is about equal to the amount Intel is set to receive in CHIPS Act grants from the government to help fund the building of chip plants in the US.

Change in direction

The move marks a clear change of direction and also follows a $2bn capital injection from SoftBank Group in what was a major vote of confidence for the troubled US chipmaker in the middle of a turnaround.

Federal backing could give Intel more breathing room to revive its loss-making foundry business, analysts said, but it still suffers from a weak product roadmap and challenges in attracting customers to its new factories.

Trump, who met Tan on August 11, has taken an unprecedented approach to national security. But critics worry Trump’s actions create new categories of corporate risk.

The US president has pushed for multibillion-dollar government tie-ups in semiconductors and rare earths, such as a pay-for-play deal with Nvidia and an arrangement with rare-earth producer MP Materials to secure critical minerals.

Tan, who took the top job at Intel in March, has been tasked to turn around the US chipmaking icon, which recorded an annual loss of $18.8bn in 2024 — its first such loss since 1986. The company’s last fiscal year of positive adjusted free cash flow was 2021.

RSF attacks kill 89 people in 10 days in Sudan’s Darfur, UN says

Ten days of “brutal” attacks by Sudan’s paramilitary Rapid Support Forces (RSF) have left at least 89 people dead in the western region of Darfur, the United Nations High commissioner for human rights says.

Since April 2023, Sudan has been torn apart by a power struggle between army chief Abdel Fattah al-Burhan and Mohamed Hamdan Daglo, commander of the rival RSF. The fighting has killed tens of thousands.

North Darfur’s besieged capital, el-Fasher, has been under siege by the RSF since May last year.

The recent RSF attacks occurred between August 11 and August 20 in el-Fasher and the nearby Abu Shouk displacement camp, Jeremy Laurence, a spokesperson for commissioner Volker Turk, said in a Geneva press briefing on Friday.

“Brutal attacks by the RSF … resulted in the killing of at least 89 civilians over a 10-day period up to August 20”, the UN human rights office said.

“We fear the actual number of civilians killed is likely higher”, Laurence added. He said such attacks were unacceptable and had to cease immediately.

The dead include at least 57 people who were killed in attacks on August 11 and another 32 killed between August 16-20, Laurence said.

“We are particularly horrified that among the most recent spate of civilian killings, 16 appear to have been cases of summary executions”, he added.

Among the dead were civilians from the African Zaghawa tribe and one from the African Berti tribe.

“This pattern of attacks on civilians and wilful killings, which are serious violations of international humanitarian law, deepens our concerns about ethnically motivated violence”, Laurence said.

War marked by gross atrocities

El-Fasher, the provincial capital of North Darfur province, is the military’s last stronghold in the sprawling region of Darfur. The RSF has bombed the city for more than a year, and last month, it imposed a total blockade on its hundreds of thousands of people.

The RSF has also repeatedly attacked Abu Shouk and another displacement camp, Zamzam, which was once Sudan’s largest, with more than 500, 000 people. The two camps are located outside el-Fasher and were largely emptied after a major RSF attack in April. They have been hit by famine.

The current war has killed more than 40, 000 people, forced more than 14 million to flee their homes and left some families eating grass in a desperate attempt to survive as famine swept parts of the country.

It has also been marked by gross atrocities, including ethnically motivated killing and rape, according to the United Nations and rights groups. The International Criminal Court has said it was also investigating alleged war crimes and crimes against humanity.

Cholera outbreak amidst war

Meanwhile, the World Health Organization (WHO) has said that regions like el-Fasher have also been experiencing “a severe humanitarian and public health crisis”, driven by the active conflict and mass displacement.

WHO spokesperson Christian Lindmeier told journalists that all 18 states in Sudan were reporting cholera, with 48, 768 cases and 1, 094 deaths reported this year up to August 11.

He said civilians have been facing severe food shortages, rising malnutrition deaths, and severely limited access to healthcare.