Category World News

In a further expansion of his pressure against Tehran’s government, US President Donald Trump has threatened to hold Iran accountable for any attacks carried out by Houthi rebels in Yemen.

On Monday, the Republican leader signed the post and posted it on his social media account Truth Social under his name.

“Don’t let anyone fool you!” The Yemeni people hate the Houthi, the sinister mobsters, and the thugs who live there, all come from IRAN, and they are all responsible for the hundreds of attacks that are carried out by them, Trump wrote.

There is no guarantee that the “Houthis” will stop at any additional attack or retaliation there.

In protest of Israel’s conflict in Gaza and its blockade of humanitarian supplies into Palestinian territory, the Houthis have launched numerous attacks against Israeli vessels and other commercial vessels in the Red Sea.

According to experts, Iran contributes to the arming of the Houthis, who are viewed as a form of informal “axis of resistance” supported by Iran.

Trump has previously urged Iran to give up its support for the Houthis, but his remarks on Monday suggest a significant uptick and suggest a possible military strike against Iran.

“Iran will be held accountable, suffer the consequences, and those consequences will be dire,” declares the statement “every shot fired by the Houthis will be treated from this point forward as being a shot fired from the weapons and leadership of IRAN.” Trump stated in his post.

Trump and his Iranian counterparts are at a delicate diplomatic crossroads as a result of these remarks.

Trump has been urging Iran to abandon its nuclear weapons, despite the president’s decision to withhold the US from the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), a resolution that would have allowed Iran to reduce its nuclear ambitions in exchange for sanctions relief, in 2018.

Trump warned the US would act “militarily” if a nuclear deal is not reached in a letter to Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei earlier this month.

Khamenei has criticized Trump’s attempts to negotiate, calling him “bullying,” and citing the fact that Trump violated the previous agreement.

Iran has consistently denied developing nuclear weapons and has consistently stated that its nuclear program is intended for civilian use.

Trump has also increased US attacks on the Houthis in response to the armed group’s warning last week that it will try to outlaw Israeli ships from nearby waterways.

Any Israeli ship that attempts to violate this restriction will be targeted by the military in the designated operational area, according to a statement from the Houthis.

Since March 2, Israel has imposed a blockade on Gaza, which has hampered the movement of humanitarian aid into the war-torn territory.

Trump, however, has a long history of supporting the US, and he responded to the Houthis’ threats with one of his own on Saturday.

Trump wrote over the weekend, quoting the US military as “to launch decisive and powerful military action against the Houthi terrorists in Yemen,” ushering in a 24-hour period of intense bombing.

The US reportedly carried out 47 aerial strikes on Saturday and Sunday, killing 53 people and striking seven Yemeni provinces. Sanaa, the Houthis’-controlled capital, was one of the affected regions.

Trump also issued a warning about Iran’s support for the Houthis in an announcing the weekend attacks.

“To Iran, support for Houthi terrorists must end right away!” Do not threaten the American people, their president, or the world’s shipping lanes, he wrote.

“Beware if you do, because America will hold you fully accountable and that America won’t treat you like that”!

Since November 2023, the Houthis have sunk two vessels in the area, and Trump is not the first president to launch attacks against Houthi targets.

Democratic President Joe Biden, who presided over Trump, ordered numerous attacks on Yemeni areas under Houthi control.

However, Biden and his administration asserted that the attacks were intended to sabotage the Houthis’ military might, and they vehemently denied that the violence was intended to escalate. In 2024, Sabrina Singh, a spokesperson for the Pentagon, said, “We don’t want to see a regional war.”

Trump, however, criticized Biden’s “pathetically weak” opposition to the Houthis. In the 2020 presidential election, Trump lost, he and Biden squared off.

Meanwhile, the Houthis have vowed to respond to Trump’s attacks. Their leader, Abdul-Malik al-Houthi, declared on Sunday, “We will confront escalation with escalation.”

The organization has already made claims that a US naval ship was targeted in retaliation.

According to Colin Clarke, the director of research for the consultancy Soufan Group, Trump’s increasingly heated rhetoric seems to contradict some of his campaign-trail statements.

Trump pledged to end US foreign wars and bring peace to the Middle East when he campaigned for a second term in 2024.

Trump has talked incessantly about leaving the Middle East, “Look.” He doesn’t want to be a part of foreign wars, Clarke said. It’s interesting that he’s using these kinetic strikes as a direct signal to Tehran’s leadership, so to speak.

Clarke added that Trump might use the Houthis’ strikes as a means of compel Iran to enter nuclear negotiations.

In order to assist Syria in rebuilding after Bashar al-Assad’s fall, the EU has pledged $2.7 billion in aid. The bloc warned that recent violence could threaten the progress made in Damascus following the pledge made at a gathering of donor countries.

A soft coup is taking place in the United States right now. Under Donald Trump’s second administration, the nation is being reshaped and rebuilt. Elon Musk, Trump’s billionaire special adviser and head of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), is in charge of this change, not Trump himself. And in Musk’s America, one demographic, “nerds,” seems to have taken center stage and are quickly gaining power.

Indeed, Marko Elez, Gavin Kliger, Edward Coristine, and Marko Elez, who have taken control of multitrillion-dollar government systems, easily made up Musk’s mendacious band of merry, young white and white-adjacent acolytes.

In the 1990s, the Internet Age and the Information Age had already seen “nerds” become billionaires and gained widespread respect and admiration for delivering the world’s technologies that transform lives. These awkward, unattractive men with limited social skills but a strong desire for technology and STEM. We were repeatedly reminded that nerds were the ones who first gave us PCs and iMacs before iPhones and Androids.

Creatives have portrayed nerds like Apple’s Steve Jobs, Revenge of the Nerds (1984), Oppenheimer (1923), and Mark Zuckerberg as underdogs in numerous articles published in tech magazines and in films like Revenge of the Nerds (1984), Oppenheimer (1923), and The Social Network (2010). Such nerdy visionaries have long been portrayed in mainstream media as complex individuals who are desperate to save the world and improve it.

The three-part documentary Triumph of the Nerds was broadcast by Channel 4 in the UK and PBS in the US three decades ago. Long-time technology journalist Robert X Cringe cited the computer revolution that the nerd set underwent between 1975 and 1995 as evidence that “the most amazing thing of all was that it happened by accident because a bunch of disenfranchised nerds wanted to impress their friends.”

The idea that the robber barons of the late 20th century accumulated enormous wealth almost accident-free while trying to save the world is a ridiculous lie may already be deeply embedded in our culture. Particularly given the iron-fisted manner in which many “nerd billionaires” — especially Jobs and Bill Gates — are thought to run their capitalist businesses.

It is obvious that the tech-savvy billionaire class wants to control the flow of truth in addition to the heavy-handed censorship that billionaires like Jeff Bezos and Patrick Soon-Shiong have used against the Washington Post and the Los Angeles Times in recent months.

In Lethal Weapon 2 (1989), Martin Riggs (Mel Gibson) said to Arjen Rudd (Joss Ackland) and his group of white South African mercenaries, “Well, well, it’s the master race. It’s the master race.” This is a much better description of the “nerds” who came to rule America under Trump.

This statement goes beyond Musk’s dreadful path to becoming a US citizen through South Africa and Canada. Similar to the South African henchmen in Lethal Weapon 2, tech nerd billionaires like Musk and the people he has worked for DOGE believe in eugenics, racism, and other misogynistic, queer, and racial paradigms. Yes, many of the Musk haters are engineers who can write for and contribute to Starlink, SpaceX, and Tesla projects that lead to significant and valuable discoveries and inventions for humanity. However, they also repost tweets that refer to a woman as a “huzz” or say, “I just want a eugenic immigration policy, is that too much to ask” on X and other social media platforms. They are not exactly role models for any workforce or multicultural democracy. And they don’t seem to care about improving the world for anyone other than themselves, much like white men generally do. When, in reality, white men continue to be the main demographic in this economic sector, they would agree with Zuckerberg’s absurd claim that the tech industry needs more “masculine energy.”

In the 1980s and 1990s, I once participated in the computer-crazy nerd community. Before moving on to becoming a writer and academic historian, I first studied computer science at the University of Pittsburgh in my eighth grade year, then I took Pascal in my eleventh grade year. I spent two years working in Pitt’s computer labs as a work-study student. I observed as my equally geeky coworkers made jokes about our “computer illiterate” classmates, including the frequent use of the r-word. I observed my male counterparts rubbing up too much against the women who needed their assistance with computer issues. And during one of my final three months on the job, a coworker groped me twice while I was still working and received sexual and racial harassment from an older, white woman.

In a movie, social awkwardness can be easily depicted as endearing and innocent. In a society that socially defaults to racist, misogynistic, queerphobic, and xenophobic behavior, it is rare if ever to be “sweet.” In a white male supremacist society, whether or not, all white men have a metric tonne of racial and gender privilege, which makes them no different from “cool” white men when left unchecked. Gilbert is being asked, “Why?” by Booger. Is there a penis on her? In Revenge of the Nerds, Musk makes a transphobic reference to his friend’s inability to date, which is not very different from Musk’s claim that he “lost” his “son” to “the woke mind virus” by his estranged transgender daughter Vivian Jenna Wilson.

Additionally, it is believed that the elite nerd elite have always had positive effects on the world. Not when social media addiction has caused depression, anxiety, and isolation in millions of younger Americans. Not with a brand-new generation of American men abusing girls and women through image-based sexual abuse. Not at all when people who are unwilling to practice critical thinking, media literacy, and writing skills turn to AI plagiarism machines (which isn’t true artificial intelligence, by any means).

Being a cool athlete versus a dictatorial, socially awkward pencil neck is truly a distinction in the world of white male privilege. Nerds and their technological advancements were only intended to improve and empower their respective worlds. No one in any other billionaire nerd camp has ever accessed Apple or Amazon’s offshore accounts and redistributed billions of dollars to regular Americans out of their wealth using their talents. Additionally, they have not eliminated every student’s student debt in the nation. These nerds ultimately also want wealth and power from the underprivileged.

A group of people allegedly used rocks to smash out the windows of a pub in North Macedonia, which is thought to be owned by the same person who also owned a nightclub where 59 people died in a fire there. According to officials, the club’s license was illegally obtained, and there were no emergency exits and fire extinguishers inside.

Vladimir Putin, the president of the United States, and Donald Trump, the president of Russia, will discuss ending the conflict in Ukraine on Tuesday, with the latter having a prominent role in the discussions.

The US president addressed reporters on Air Force One on Sunday during a flight back to the Washington, DC, area from Florida, to see if we can end that war. “We may be able to, perhaps not, but I believe we have a very good chance.

On Tuesday, I’ll meet with President Putin. Over the weekend, a lot of work has been accomplished.

Putin and Trump will speak via phone, according to Dmitry Peskov, a spokesman for the Kremlin, who confirmed the announcement on Monday.

During a news briefing, he said, “Yes, this is indeed the case.” For Tuesday, we’re preparing for a conversation like this.

As both sides continued to conduct heavy aerial strikes over the weekend as Russia moved closer to ejecting Ukrainian forces from their months-old foothold in Kursk, west of Russia, Trump is trying to win Putin’s approval of a 30-day ceasefire that Ukraine approved last week.

When asked what concessions were being discussed during the ceasefire negotiations, Trump responded, “We’ll be talking about land. Power plants will be the subject of our discussion. We’re already discussing that, including the division of some assets.

Trump’s mention of the largest nuclear plant in Europe, the Russian-occupied Zaporizhzhia nuclear facility, was most likely made in the absence of any specifics. Russia and Ukraine have accused one another of attacks that could have caused an accident at the plant.

According to Al Jazeera’s Dorsa Jabbari, who is based in Moscow, the Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Power Plant is likely to be one of the main topics of discussion.

The largest nuclear facility in Europe, which was under Russian control at the start of the conflict in March 2022, is “. It has since been shut down, but it continues to be run by Russian forces and Rosatom, Russia’s state nuclear energy organization, she said.

The proposed temporary ceasefire is also present. Russia asserts that any security guarantees for its side must be included in any such agreement, which means it opposes Ukraine’s attempt to resurrect, regroup, and restart the conflict, “she continued.

The Kremlin claimed on Friday that US envoy Steve Witkoff, who was in Moscow, had contacted Putin to let him know about his ceasefire plan, and that he had been expressing “prudent optimism” that a resolution could be reached to end the three-year conflict.

In separate appearances on US Sunday TV shows, Witkoff, Marco Rubio, Trump’s national security adviser, Mike Waltz, stressed that a ceasefire and other issues must be resolved before there is a definitive resolution.

After Kyiv accepted the US’s request for a 30-day interim ceasefire, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy declared on Friday that he believed there was a good chance of the Russian conflict to come to an end.

However, Zelenskyy has consistently stated that Russia must renounce the territory it has seized in order for its country’s sovereignty to remain unwavering. Since Russia invaded Ukraine in 2022, it now controls parts of four of its eastern and southern regions.

Putin claimed that his actions in Ukraine are meant to safeguard Russia’s security from NATO’s expansion, which he sees as an aggressive and hostile West. Russia is engaged in an unprovoked aggression and land grab, according to Ukraine and its Western partners.

Moscow has demanded that Ukraine abandon its NATO ambitions, that Russia maintains full control over all of Ukraine’s seized territory, and that the size of the Ukrainian army be restricted. Additionally, it wants the lifting of Western sanctions and Ukraine’s first presidential election, which Kyiv claimed is premature given the country’s current state of martial law.

Kaja Kallas, the head of the European Union’s foreign policy, claimed on Monday that Moscow’s demands for a ceasefire demonstrated this.

British Prime Minister Keir Starmer stated on Saturday that Western allies, besides the US, were making more preparations to support Ukraine in the event of a ceasefire with Russia, with “vigorous plans” set to be released “next week.”

Both France and Britain have indicated that they will send a peacekeeping force to monitor any ceasefire in Ukraine.

Mark Carney, the new Canadian prime minister, also pledged to support Ukraine’s sovereignty during a meeting with his French counterpart, President Emmanuel Macron, on Monday in Paris.

Local authorities reported on Monday that as Moscow launched a barrage of nearly 200 drones against Ukraine, Ukrainian forces overnight launched a drone attack on southern Russia, igniting a fire at an oil refinery.

Before the attack, which sparked a large blaze, the Astrakhan governor Igor Babushkin claimed that employees of the “fuel and energy” complex had been evacuated.

“During the attack, one person was hurt. According to Babuschkin, the victim has now been hospitalized.

Ukraine is currently voicing criticism against Russia for repressing the US to endorse the US-proposed ceasefire without conditions.

Moscow also attacked Ukraine with a barrage of 174 drones, including the Shahed drone, which was designed by Iran, according to the air force.