Donald Trump backtracks on plans to ‘surge’ military to San Francisco

President Donald Trump had threatened to send American military personnel to San Francisco, California, for weeks.

Trump, however, abruptly changed his mind on Thursday, saying he would not advance further with a “surge” of troops toward the Democratic stronghold, at least for the time being.

Recommended Stories

list of 3 itemsend of list

On his online platform Truth Social, Trump wrote that the Federal Government was “surge” San Francisco, California, on Saturday after friends in the area called last night to ask him not to proceed with the surge.

The Republican leader said that the two tech titans, Nvidia’s CEO Jensen Huang and Salesforce cofounder Marc Benioff, had persuaded him to change his mind.

Trump continued, adding that he had spoken with Democratic Party candidate Daniel Lurie, the mayor of San Francisco. The president made the conceit that Thursday’s decision might not be his final word on the subject when they reacted to their request, though.

Trump criticized Lurie in his post, saying, “He very nicely, that I give him a chance to see if he can turn things around.”

Because we can move much more quickly and remove criminals than the Law allows him to remove, I told him, “I think he is making a mistake.” Let’s see how you do, I told him, “It’s an easier process if we do it, faster, stronger, and safer.”

On October 23 in San Francisco, San Francisco Mayor Daniel Lurie discusses President Donald Trump’s remarks.

“Cruel, un-American tactics”

Trump has spearheaded a campaign of mass deportations that has sparked protests and concerns about human rights violations since taking office in January for a second term.

Trump has responded to those protests by sending National Guard troops to major cities with the ostensible goal of defending federal immigration agents.

However, critics have repeatedly warned against the military deployments, including California Governor Gavin Newsom, because they increase tensions and violate the law.

Among those critics was Lurie, one of the Levi Strauss jeans company’s heirs.

The mayor called on San Francisco’s citizens to stand united at a press conference on Wednesday as the city prepared for a planned deployment.

This federal administration has already used unjustified, cruel tactics against immigrant neighborhoods in our city. We will protest if we see these tactics being used again or escalated,” Lurie remarked.

He argued that local law enforcement would not assist the government in carrying out immigration raids.

San Francisco and I will never stand by while our neighbors are being targeted, Lurie continued.

California’s state government had earlier earlier in the week forewarned that it would file a lawsuit as soon as federalized National Guard troops arrived in San Francisco.

According to the article, the Posse Comitatus Act expressly forbids federal troops from carrying out civilian law enforcement unless requested by the state.

Governor Newsom, who is regarded as a front-runner for the next presidential election, compared Trump’s actions to those of a “wannabe tyrant,” in a statement.

The idea that the federal government can send troops into our cities without providing any evidence that it has any basis in reality, without oversight, no accountability, or no respect for state sovereignty, is an attack on the rule of law, Newsom said.

A US Border Patrol agent tries to clear protesters away from a car entering a Coast Guard facility
On October 23, a US Border Patrol agent tries to deter protesters from entering a vehicle at US Coast Guard Base in Alameda, California.

series of crackdowns

Despite the protests of states like California and Illinois, Trump has continued with the National Guard’s deployments, causing a wave of lawsuits.

California is still fighting Trump’s decision to send troops to Los Angeles in June, a city that was rife with protests and outrage over immigration raids at workplaces, shopping centers, and parks.

The streets were covered in demonstrations, the majority of which were peaceful. Trump sent as many as 4, 000 members of the California National Guard to the city as a result of Newsom’s opposition, but he still accused protesters of being violent.

The Trump administration cited passages from the US Code as justification, despite Newsom’s claim that the deployment violated the Posse Comitatus Act.

If there is a threat of invasion or rebellion, or if the federal government is unable to enforce its laws in another way, the US Code permits federalization of state National Guard troops.

Despite the opposition from local leaders, the Trump administration has continued to send National Guard troops to other Democratic-led jurisdictions despite the protests’ largely subsided.

For instance, earlier this month, Trump authorized the National Guard to visit Chicago, Illinois, which led to a lawsuit from that state.

The president also made the announcement on Truth Social that troops would be stationed in Portland, Oregon, a move that an emergency court petition blocked.

Meanwhile, Trump has praised the advantages of military deployments to Memphis, Tennessee and Washington, DC, arguing that both cities saw a drop in crime as a result.

Marc Benioff
Marc Benioff, a cofounder of Salesforce, received criticism for calling for a deployment of the National Guard in San Francisco.

San Francisco is a teetering subject.

San Francisco has long been a punching bag for Trump and other Republicans because it has a long history of being a left-wing bastion.

The president criticized the city’s Democratic leadership even while on the campaign trail, blaming it for “destruction” in San Francisco.

Trump has since criticized the city as the subject of his upcoming immigration and crime crackdown.

Trump stated to Fox News on October 19 that “we’re going to go to San Francisco.” “One of the greatest cities in the world was San Francisco,” he declared. Then, fifteen years ago, something went wrong. It woke up.

One of Trump’s supporters, Marc Benioff, shared his opinion of Trump’s decision to change course on Thursday.

San Francisco is home to the billionaire’s software company, Salesforce, and Benioff annually holds a weekend-long tech conference there.

Benioff, however, told The New York Times that he would welcome the National Guard in San Francisco, a response to Republican demands to “clean” the city on the eve of the event this year.

If someone can be cops, I’m all for it, Benioff said. “We don’t have enough cops.

Comedians scheduled to perform at his annual conference dropped out of the conversation after those comments were immediately met with immediate backlash from city officials. Benioff apologized on social media a few days later.

Benioff cited his conversations with locals as evidence that “the National Guard is not needed to address safety in San Francisco.”

I sincerely apologize for the concern it caused, and I apologize for my earlier comment, which was based on the event’s abundance of caution.

Benioff was one of the advisers Trump cited as having an impact on his decision to withdraw from his feared deployment on Thursday.

Protests had already erupted outside the San Francisco Bay Area’s US Coast Guard facility in Alameda.

Mayor Lurie, in response to the city’s efforts to reduce accidental overdoses, said he would welcome “continued partnerships” with the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) or the Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA).

Lurie continued, adding that the invitation did not include military participation.

EU leaders delay decision on using frozen Russian funds to aid Ukraine

Following Belgium’s objections, leaders from across the European Union decided to support Ukraine in its fight against Russia’s invasion, but they decided against going along with a plan that would use frozen Russian assets instead.

On Thursday, EU leaders met in Brussels to discuss Ukraine’s “pressing financial needs” for the coming two years. Numerous leaders hoped that the discussions would pave the way for a so-called “reparation loan” that would finance a 140 billion euro ($163.3 billion) loan for Ukraine using Russian assets that had been frozen by the Belgian financial institution Euroclear.

Recommended Stories

list of 3 itemsend of list

After Russia launched its full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022, the EU frozen about 200 billion euros ($232.4 billion) of its central bank assets. The European Commission, the executive branch of the EU, has proposed a complex financial maneuver that involves the EU borrowing mature funds from Euroclear in order to use the assets to fund Ukraine’s war effort.

The money would then be repaid with a loan to Ukraine under the condition that only Russia would make the necessary repairs.

The 27 member states of the EU would have to guarantee that the scheme would be “fully guaranteed,” meaning they would have to pay Euroclear back if they ultimately decided that Russia could reclaim the assets without making any reparations. The legality of Euroclear was raised on Thursday by Belgian Prime Minister Bart De Wever, who had earlier opposed this plan.

Russia has referred to the idea as an unlawful seizure of property and has issued a warning about retaliation.

Following Thursday’s political wrangling, a text that was revised from previous drafts to include “options for financial support based on an assessment of Ukraine’s financing needs was approved by all the leaders, with the exception of Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban. At their upcoming summit in December, European leaders will be given those options.

The declaration further stated that “Russia’s assets and assets should remain immobilized until Russia stops its aggression against Ukraine and makes up for the harm it caused.”

Prior to the summit, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy had urged the loan plan to be approved quickly.

He told the leaders of the&nbsp, EU&nbsp, saying “anyone who delays the decision to use fully the resources of&nbsp, frozen&nbsp, Russian&nbsp, or assets,” that “does not only impede our defense, but also slows down the&nbsp, EU’s own progress,” adding that Kyiv&nbsp would use a significant portion of the funds to purchase&nbsp

On Thursday, the EU also ratified a new round of severe sanctions against Russian energy exports and an import ban for liquefied natural gas.

The action came after Donald Trump announced on Wednesday that sanctions would apply to Russia’s two biggest oil companies.

Israeli strikes kill four in new Lebanon ceasefire breach

The Israeli Ministry of Health claims that at least four people have died as a result of Israeli airstrikes in eastern and southern Lebanon, the most recent violation of the November ceasefire agreement.

Two people were killed in an attack on two mountainous regions in the east on Thursday, according to the ministry. In a separate attack in Arabsalim in southern Lebanon, two others were later reported to have died. An elderly woman was named as one of the victims, according to the official National News Agency (NNA).

Recommended Stories

list of 3 itemsend of list

In the Bekaa region, close to Syria’s border, “Israeli warplanes launched a series of violent strikes on the eastern mountain range,” according to the NNA.

The Hermel range in the country’s northeast was also the target of two Israeli strikes, according to the report.

The Israeli military claimed to have attacked sites in east and north Lebanon that are linked to the Lebanese armed group Hezbollah, including a “military camp and a site for the production of precision missiles” in the Bekaa Valley.

The military claimed in a statement that it had “struck several terrorist targets” in the area, including a “camp used for training Hezbollah militants.”

Later, it revealed that it had also “attacked a Hezbollah weapons storage facility in the Nabatieh region.” Hezbollah did not respond right away.

Despite the truce calling for a full withdrawal earlier this year, Israel has continued to launch nearly daily assaults on Lebanese territory, particularly in the south, and to maintain a military presence at five border crossings.

Hezbollah launched rockets into Israel in what it claimed was solidarity with the people of Gaza after Israel declared war on the besieged Palestinian territory in October 2023.

More than 4, 000 people had already died and almost 17, 000 had been injured by the ceasefire, which was reached in November of the following year.

Lebanon’s conflict with a plan being pursued by the United States and Israel to disarm Hezbollah, a strategy that the organization and its allies oppose, is putting pressure on the fragile truce even more.

Is Trump losing patience with Putin over the Ukraine war?

Following the cancellation of a summit with President Vladimir Putin regarding the Ukraine war, US President Donald Trump now sanctions Russia’s two biggest oil companies.

Additionally, new measures targeting Russian assets and oil have been announced by the European Union.

Will they bring the war to an end any quicker?

Presenter: Bernard Smith

Guests:

Director of the Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft’s Eurasia program, Anatol Lieven

The New York Times’ Chief Diplomatic Correspondent for Europe is Steven Erlanger.

Colombia’s Gustavo Petro dismisses threatened US aid cuts as ‘nothing’