The mothers, children suffering Israel’s engineered starvation in Gaza

Deir el-Balah, Gaza – Every morning for Israa Abu Reyala and her husband, Mohammad, is a battle to find decent food for their five daughters, the youngest three of whom are triplets born during the war.

The ceasefire agreement, which took effect about a month ago, has made little difference in the family’s daily life, Israa, 31, and Mohammad, 33, told Al Jazeera.

Recommended Stories

list of 3 itemsend of list

“The war was a nightmare,” Israa says as she feeds her little ones in her parents’ home in Deir el-Balah. “But the hardest part by far has been finding food, milk, and supplies for my three babies.”

Israa learned she was pregnant with triplets two months before the war.

“We were planning for a third child, not three at once,” she laughs, exchanging a look with her husband.

Their concerns at the time – about income, rent, and how to manage three infants – feel like paradise now compared to what they lived through during the pregnancy and birth, they say.

‘I’m worried’

Israa says her triplets, who are now 19 months old, don’t even know what an egg looks – much less tastes – like. They’ve eaten chicken a few times, but only when sharing meals with extended family.

The couple had high hopes for the ceasefire that ostensibly ended Israel’s war on Gaza and stipulated that Israel would allow food and aid supplies to enter the beleaguered enclave.

But instead of more and higher-quality food entering Gaza, they found little of nutritional value.

Mohammad says the markets are “stuffed with commercial goods” like biscuits, chocolate, candy, snacks, nuts, and canned foods, with few fruits and vegetables that enter at prices many can’t afford.

“But what about the quality? What about proper food? And the prices are insane,” he adds.

“Where are the eggs? Where is meat and poultry? Fresh dairy and cheese? Everything healthy, nutritious, or essential for children doesn’t exist, and if it does, it’s in tiny quantities and disappears instantly,” Israa says.

Humanitarian officials call the state Israel has imposed on Gaza since it launched its genocidal war on it in October 2023, engineered starvation – a policy aimed at weakening the population physically and psychologically until society collapses from within.

Dr Khalil al-Degran, a spokesperson for the Ministry of Health in Gaza, told Al Jazeera that Israel has not adhered to humanitarian protocols requiring the entry of food and medical aid into Gaza, with quantities entering now “only 15 to 20 percent of actual needs”.

He adds that the products Israel allows in are nonessentials, like chips and instant noodles, which lack vital nutrients.

Markets remain empty of meat, poultry, dairy products, eggs, and most protein and fat sources, he says, calling it “clear engineered starvation”.

Israa feeds Keraz, Kifah, and Jumana [Atia Darwish/Al Jazeera]

Israa says her girls are getting more to eat now, but she still worries because of the severe lack of nutritious food.

“I’m worried about my health, too,” she says. “I did lab tests last month and the specialist told me I’m in the early stages of malnutrition.”

A premature birth

Ten-year-old Toleen says she will never forget the tanks and Israeli soldiers she had to walk past with her parents, hands up in the air, holding white flags.

She and her six-year-old sister, Jana, had fled with their parents from one displacement shelter to another for weeks before they fled south on foot through what Israel called “the safe corridor”.

They tried to stay in the north, leaving their home in Shati refugee camp for a UNRWA school in al-Nasr – but Israeli tanks kept advancing, and the family had to keep fleeing.

So one day in November 2023, they headed south to Israa’s parents’ home in Deir el-Balah, central Gaza, where she spent the rest of her pregnancy and delivery, struggling with malnutrition and the fear of Israeli bombs.

They stayed there until a ceasefire in January this year, when they went back to Gaza City, only to be caught by a famine caused by Israel’s blocking of the entry of all aid supplies.

On March 28, 2024, two weeks before her scheduled caesarean section, she was woken up at night by labour pains, but the war was raging, with intense Israeli bombardment in nearby Nuseirat.

Moving at night was dangerous, and they had to call the ambulance service repeatedly, telling them they were expecting triplets, before Israa was taken to al-Awda Hospital for an emergency c-section.

Her daughters, Keraz, Kifah, and Jumana were born, one weighing two kilogrammes (4.4 pounds) and two weighing in at 1.9 kilogrammes (4.2 pounds), well within the average for healthy triplets.

“Giving birth to healthy babies in a war felt like a miracle,” she says.

Dr al-Degran says most pregnant and breastfeeding women face acute anaemia caused by a lack of food and supplements, with many giving birth prematurely or miscarrying.

Once home, the struggle to find baby formula, diapers, and clothes for the newborns began.

The triplets needed about one can of formula per day, which their severely malnourished mother had to supplement by breastfeeding them. Her health collapsed.

“My body was exhausted and hungry,” Israa says.

“These three … I cried as they cried from hunger,” she says, looking at her triplets playing nearby.

“‘Nanna, nanna, nanna,’ that’s the sound they made asking for food, day and night. I can still hear it.”

Israa and her husband spiralled.

“I used to escape into the street from my babies’ screams, walking aimlessly, crying for hours,” she says.

Dr Khalil Al-Deqran, a spokesperson for the Ministry of Health in Gaza
Dr Khalil al-Degran, a spokesperson for the Ministry of Health in Gaza [Atia Darwish/Al Jazeera]

Damage that may be irreversible

Al-Degran says Gaza has suffered chronic malnutrition throughout Israel’s genocidal war on the enclave.

He warns that even if essential foods were allowed in today, the damage done to children, especially infants, has already left long-term physical and cognitive consequences.

Israa’s daily struggle continues, as she divides a single bite of food into three portions for her three infants.

“This piece for one, this for the second, and this for the third … just so they quiet down a little. But then they start crying again. They don’t understand. They’re just hungry.”

Israa and Mohammad remain grateful for what little they have, though Israa cannot hide her heartbreak over Toleen and Jana, who she says have endured hunger and still tried to help her care for the babies.

The family’s only wish now is simple: “To see a semblance of a normal life again,” Israa says.

“Open crossings. Food. Supplies. Aid.

Two missing after mudslides rip through northern Italy

NewsFeed

After a mudslide ripped through a home in Brazzano di Cormons overnight, firefighters are searching for two missing people in northeastern Italy. Unknown are a 35-year-old German man who lives nearby and a woman who is still unaccounted for. There has already been a rescue for one person.

UK’s sweeping asylum law changes: How will they impact refugees?

Before proposals for major government changes that would end refugees’ automatic right to permanent residency in the UK, home secretary Shabana Mahmood claimed the country’s asylum system is “not working” and is “putting communities under enormous strain.”

Speaking to the BBC on Sunday, Mahmood said undocumented migration is “tearing the country apart”.

Recommended Stories

list of 4 itemsend of list

The government’s proposals, to be unveiled on Monday, will have two main prongs. First, they would put an end to refugees’ automatic transition to settled status after five years. Second, they would forbid those who have the right to work and are able to provide for themselves from receiving state benefits.

After a summer of fierce protests outside&nbsp, hotels&nbsp, housing asylum seekers and an anti-immigration march in London, Mahmood also announced new plans to curb small-boat crossings from France as well as to return refugees to their home countries once it is safe to do so.

What are the numbers for immigration right now?

Net migration, or the number of people entering a nation minus the number leaving, has increased by 200, 000 to 300, 000 people annually since 2011, according to figures from the Office for National Statistics (ONS).

However, after Brexit was enacted in 2020, there was a large increase in the number of undocumented immigrants entering the UK. According to ONS data, net migration increased to 906, 000 over the course of the 12-month period until June 2023.

However, more recent statistics revealed a sharp decline in those figures since then. Net migration figures dropped by more than half in 2024 – to 431, 000. The decrease in the availability of student visas and healthcare was largely attributable to this.

Despite the media’s coverage of people entering the UK in small boats from France, this group only accounts for a small portion of the country’s total population. In 2024, for instance, the Home Office found that 36, 816 people who arrived in the UK came via small boats. &nbsp ,

Last year, 108 out of 138 people applied for asylum. Of those, only one-third came via small boats. As a result, the majority of asylum applications were processed formal (and included some of the people’s dependents).

Despite the declining numbers, there is still a lot of unease with the ruling Labour Party. In an August YouGov poll, 38 percent of respondents said they believed Reform UK, an anti-immigration party, would be more effective at handling asylum cases than Labour, who secured just 9 percent of the tally.

What modifications has the government announced?

citizenship acquiescement

On Monday, the government is expected to&nbsp, announce&nbsp, a shift from permanent settlement for refugees to a temporary-protection model.

The current regulations allow for an “indefinite leave to remain” request, allowing for the right to citizenship, for refugees who have been granted asylum to remain in the UK for five years.

However, under the new regulations, those seeking permanent residency in the UK must first apply for asylum for up to 20 years.

In addition, people granted asylum would have to renew their status every 30 months to see if the situation in their home country has changed such that UK residence is still required.

Social benefits are available to you.

Mahmood said she intends to end the government’s legal obligation to provide all asylum seekers with basic financial support.

The government is expected to withdraw support from asylum seekers deemed able to work as well as from those people who commit offences, ignore removal orders or work illegally.

If their asylum claim has been delayed for at least a year, or longer, asylum seekers may now apply for employment.

What are the claims of refugee rights organizations?

Enver Solomon, chief executive of the Refugee Council charity, said that instead of deterring migrants, the 20-year path to citizenship would “leave people in limbo and experiencing intense anxiety for many, many years”.

He stated on Sunday on BBC Breakfast that “we need a system that is controlled and fair, and the way you do that is you make decisions fairly, in a timely manner, and they go on and contribute to our communities and give back.”

According to Mahmood’s suggestion for 30-month checks, refugees could be returned to their home countries once the government believes the situation has improved, a move that was inspired by Denmark’s much-discussed policy.

Although research by the Danish Foreign Policy Yearbook has found that deterrence has limited influence on where asylum seekers travel to, a 2017 study did suggest that Denmark’s “negative branding” had led to fewer asylum applications.

What other people’s opinions of the proposals were there?

The opposition home office minister, Matt Vickers, claimed the government’s new plans to reform the asylum system contain “lots of gimmicks” while Oxford University’s Migration Observatory predicted that Mahmood’s overhaul would place the UK’s immigration system among the most restrictive nations in Europe.

He told the BBC that a “deterrent” is what is needed: “If people arrive in this country and know they’re going to get sent back, they won’t get in those boats in the first place”.

What other recommendations does the UK government make?

Using artificial intelligence to determine age

The government wants to introduce artificial intelligence-based assessments to determine the age of people who arrive without documentation. According to ministers, errors in the current system could lead to mistreatment of minors as adults or the introduction of adult-oriented care.

However, rights organizations warned that automated systems could instill prejudice, unfairly classify children as adults, and harm them.

Earlier this year, Solomon told the BBC that he was “not convinced” that using AI tools was the government’s correct approach on age identification because he has concerns about children being put in unsafe situations. He continued, “These AI] technologies continue to raise serious questions about accuracy, ethics, and fairness.”

Threatened by a visa ban for three African nations

The Home Office has said visa applications from Angola, Namibia and the Democratic Republic of the Congo will be refused unless their governments improve collaboration with the UK regarding the deportation of their nationals.

The department’s “unacceptably low cooperation and obstructive return procedures” was cited as the potential penalty in a statement.

They would be subject to restrictions “unless they consent to the return of their criminals and irregular migrants.”

Right to ‘ family life ‘ claims to be checked

The government’s interpretation of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) in regard to family law is also being covered by the UK media.

According to the government, Article 8 of the ECHR, which guarantees the right to a family and private life, will be reinterpreted “to better reflect the expectations of the British public.”

The new law would likely clarify that a “family connection” refers to immediate relatives only, such as a parent or child, and not to extended family members.

What will the impact be for Ukrainian refugees?

When asked about Ukrainians fleeing Russia’s invasion, Mahmood said they would continue to be admitted under a “bespoke scheme” and would be expected to return once the conflict was over. She stressed that many arrivals from Ukraine have expressed a desire to return home.

Ukrainian refugees have access to healthcare, education, and benefits under the current arrangement. Ukrainian nationals are largely exempt from the new 20-year settlement rules for asylum seekers because these visas are only temporary.

Will there be new authorised pathways for asylum seekers to come to the UK?

Through the UK’s Afghan Citizens Resettlement Scheme, vulnerable Afghan citizens from Afghanistan are granted legal residency, employment, education, and healthcare in addition to Ukrainians.

Additionally, the BNO visa, which provides a pathway to settled and eventual citizenship, grants Hong Kong BNO status holders and their dependents the right to reside, work, and study in the UK.

Mahmood also told the BBC that new “safe and legal” avenues will be introduced to try to reduce the number of people attempting perilous crossings of the English Channel.

Organisations like Amnesty International have repeatedly emphasized that many people have no choice but to enter illegally because of strict laws and restricted visa programs.

To reduce people smuggling and fatalities, Amnesty International has called on Westminster to expand legal avenues, including family reunification, and community sponsorship.

One option would be to allow individuals and charities in the UK to sponsor refugees, echoing the Homes for Ukraine scheme, which endows local communities with housing responsibilities.

South Korea proposes talks with North Korea on military demarcation line

South Korea has proposed talks with North Korea to avoid border clashes, the first such offer in seven years as Seoul seeks to ease military tensions with its nuclear-armed neighbour.

Citing recent incursions by North Korean troops, Kim Hong-cheol, deputy minister for national defence policy, told a news briefing on Monday that military-to-military channels can help avert an escalation.

Recommended Stories

list of 4 itemsend of list

“To prevent accidental clashes and ease military tensions, our military officially proposes that the two sides hold inter-Korean military talks to discuss the establishment of a clear reference line for the MDL,” he said, referring to the military demarcation line on their border.

Seoul and Pyongyang technically remain at war because the 1953 Korean Armistice Agreement, which halted the conflict between them, was never followed by a peace treaty.

The MDL lies inside the Demilitarised Zone (DMZ), a buffer zone that runs for 250km (160 miles) across the Korean Peninsula with a width of 4km (2.5 miles).

An estimated 2 million mines are peppered inside and along the border, which is also guarded by combat troops, barbed-wire fences and tank traps

Warning shots fired

Kim said North Korean soldiers have repeatedly crossed the demarcation line “while installing tactical roads, fences and laying mines”.

South Korean soldiers have fired warning shots and issued broadcasts to encourage the North Koreans to retreat, he said.

The proposed military talks follow South Korean President Lee Jae Myung’s offer of broader discussions with the North without conditions, a sharp reversal from the hawkish stance taken by his conservative predecessor.

Lee has taken several steps to ease tensions since taking office in June, including removing propaganda loudspeakers along the border and banning the dropping of anti-Pyongyang leaflets.

North Korea has yet to respond to Lee’s overtures, and if it accepts the latest proposal, it would mark the first military talks between the two sides since 2018.

Lee’s attempts to advance dialogue with Pyongyang have replaced former South Korean President Yoon Suk-yeol’s hardline approach to the North.

Yoon’s hawkish policies were halted when he was impeached and removed from office over his declaration of martial law in December.