Dutch foreign minister resigns over Israel sanctions deadlock

Caspar Veldkamp, the country’s foreign minister, resigned after failing to secure the government’s support for additional sanctions against Israel for its military assault on Gaza.

Veldkamp, a member of the centre-right New Social Contract party, claimed on Friday that colleagues had repeatedly resisted imposing “meaningful measures” and had repeatedly faced opposition to them because they were already putting in place.

Bezalel Smotrich and Itamar Ben-Gvir, two far-right Israeli ministers, were among his efforts, including enforcing entry bans against them for their involvement in provoking settler violence against Palestinians.

Additionally, Veldkamp issued a warning about “deteriorating conditions” in Gaza and the “risk of undesirable end use” by robbing three export permits for navy ship components.

“I also observe the construction decision for the disputed settlement E1, as well as the attacks on Gaza City, the developments in the West Bank, and East Jerusalem,” Veldkamp told reporters.

As the European Union negotiates security guarantees for Ukraine and continues to discuss tariffs with the United States, his departure leaves the Netherlands without a foreign minister.

All New Social Contract ministers and state secretaries resigned from the caretaker government in solidarity after he resigned.

Veldkamp was “under increasing pressure from parliamentarians, particularly from the opposition who have been asking for stricter sanctions against Israel,” according to Al Jazeera’s Step Vaessen, who was reporting from Berlin on the developments in the Netherlands.

Vaessen said the foreign minister was facing growing demands that the Dutch government “should be doing more,” despite Veldkamp’s announcement to ban two Israeli ministers from traveling there a few weeks ago.

The Dutch foreign minister had “increasingly become frustrated because Germany was blocking that,” Vaessen continued, noting that “Veldkamp has also been pushing for a suspension of the EU’s trade agreement with Israel.” The Dutch parliament also pushed the idea that the Netherlands should impose sanctions on Israel on its own instead of waiting for any further European sanctions.

Relations between Israel and Europe

Despite the country’s limited sanctions against Israel, the nation continues to support the F-35 fighter jet’s supply chain.

According to research from the Palestinian Youth Movement, ships carrying F-35 components frequently dock at Rotterdam, which is run by Danish shipping company Maersk.

Israel has engaged in F-35 jets in airstrikes on Gaza, which have destroyed much of the Strip and caused more than 62, 000 lives since October 2023.

The Netherlands joined 20 other countries earlier this week to denounce Israel’s approval of a sizable expansion of the West Bank’s settlements, calling it “unacceptable and contrary to international law.”

In addition, as a result of the mounting famine, Israel’s military attacks on Gaza continue. Residents of Gaza City and the surrounding areas are currently in officially famine conditions, according to a global hunger monitor’s confirmation on Friday.

Ghislaine Maxwell praises Trump in transcripts released by government

One of the top officials, Ghislaine Maxwell, the former partner of child sex abuser Jeffrey Epstein, and one of the US Department of Justice’s transcripts has been released.

Their meeting took place in July as Donald Trump’s administration struggled to reduce scrutiny over his alleged ties to Epstein.

Maxwell praised Trump in the transcripts released on Friday, insisting that she had never witnessed him act inappropriately.

Maxwell, who is currently serving a 20-year sentence for sex trafficking convictions, said, “I actually never saw the president in any kind of massage setting.”

“Never in any way did I see the president in an inappropriate setting.” Never did the president have inappropriate relations with anyone. He was a gentleman in every way when I was with him.

Second-in-chief of the Justice Department, Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche, previously claimed to have met with Maxwell to check if she “has information about anyone who has crimes against victims.”

However, the release of the transcripts is likely to rekindle concerns about how the Justice Department handled the Epstein case, which has spawned conspiracy theories and speculation among Trump’s supporters.

Blanche stated on Friday that “every word is included” in the released transcripts, excluding the names of the victims.

Nothing has been removed. He continued, “There is no hiding.”

Maxwell denied having any knowledge of a rumored “client list,” which is a subject of conspiracies against Americans for the right.

She also praised Trump for his actions and his “extraordinary accomplishment” in taking office now.

Trump “always treated me with kindness and cordiality,” Maxwell continued, “I like him, and I’ve always liked him.”

Maxwell was transferred from a low-security federal prison in Florida to a Texas minimum-security camp after meeting with Blanche, which took place over the course of two days in a courthouse.

The change’s cause has not been disclosed by the government.

However, Virginia Giuffre, one of Epstein’s most well-known accusers,’s family, demanded that the Trump administration not extend Maxwell’s leniency following the meeting.

Anything less would go down in history as one of the worst travesties of justice, according to Giuffre’s relatives in a statement. In April, Giuffre committed suicide.

In his own death, Epstein was discovered dead in his jail cell in 2019. His execution was declared a suicide by hanging.

Despite the fact that there are numerous conspiracy theories in the US suggesting that Epstein’s abuse may have been a cover-up, it has been suggested that his death may have occurred.

According to experts, the saga has sown a pretext for the perception that the wealthy and powerful are held accountable, and Trump’s “Make America Great Again” (MAGA) supporters have long supported efforts to “drain the swamp,” a phrase used to call for the elimination of corrupt forces in government and leading industries.

Some of these suspicions have stooped into conspiracy theories about gangs of scheming paedophiles working for the ruling class.

For instance, a suspect shot a gun into the Comet Ping Pong Pizzeria in Washington, DC in 2016 out of the conceit that it housed a ring.

There was widespread rumor in the Epstein case that the disgraced financier used a “client list” to intimidate powerful individuals.

Earlier than that, including Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) Director Kash Patel, several members of the Trump administration had actively promoted that conspiracy theory.

He later retreated after serving in Trump’s second term, when the FBI and DOJ jointly declared there was no such list in a joint memo. Additionally, Epstein’s suicide was confirmed in that memo, and no additional suspects had been made of his crimes.

However, the memo did not stifle public interest in the scandal, and many people made it clear that Pam Bondi, the attorney general, had a client list for review when she told Fox News in February. Bondi has since claimed that she made up the Epstein Files in general and that she misspoke.

DRC prosecutor seeks death penalty for former leader Joseph Kabila

Former President Joseph Kabila is being tried in absentia, but a military prosecutor in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) is demanding the death penalty.

The court heard that general Lucien Rene Likulia, the country’s military auditor general, had requested that judges sentence Kabila to death for treason and war crimes, including homicide, torture, and organizing an insurrection.

In July, the former president was detained for allegedly supporting Rwanda-backed M23 rebels, who seized significant chunks of the mineral-rich eastern DRC this year in absentia.

Kabila is accused of plotting to overthrow President Felix Tshisekedi and other war crimes crimes crimes related to the M23 group, a fact that has been ongoing for two years outside of the DRC.

The “forcible occupation of the city of Goma,” which M23 fighters seized in January before agreeing a ceasefire with the government in July, was also noted in the charge sheet against him, which was visible to the AFP news agency.

Kabila has called the trial “an instrument of oppression,” calling it an “instrument of oppression.”

It is an act of relentlessness and persecution against a member of the opposition, according to Ferdinand Kambere, the political party secretary for Kabila.

No judicial executions have occurred since the DRC lifted its moratorium on the death penalty last year.

Who is the brains behind M23?

Kabila resigned in 2018 after almost two decades in power. Since late 2023, he has spent most of his time abroad, most recently in South Africa.

In April, he announced that he would be making a trip to the DRC to promote peace in the region’s devastated east. Later that month, the DRC’s government announced a swift ban on his political party and the seizing of his assets.

His immunity from prosecution was lifted by the DRC’s senate in May.

In front of M23’s spokesperson Lawrence Kanyuka, Kabila made an appearance in the rebel-held east in late May.

Tshisekedi, his successor to the presidency, has alleged that Rwanda has assisted him in capturing cities in the resource-rich east.

Kabila is accused of conspiring with Rwanda to “overthrow by force the power established by law” (AFC), which is M23’s political arm, and of initiating the charge sheet.

Additionally, it claimed that Kabila was to blame for the atrocities committed by the movement in the provinces of North and South Kivu.

Rwanda has denied providing M23 with military support, but UN experts claim that its army contributed to the group’s offensive there.

In a statement to journalists in Goma in July, the AFC and M23’s executive secretary, Benjamin Mbonimpa, defended the movement against Kabila and said his trial was part of a “malevolent strategy” against him.

Kabila assumed power in the DRC between 2001 and 2009 after his father’s murder.

The former leader still has a significant impact on Congolese politics despite his leaving in 2023. He has criticized Tshisekedi’s “dictatorship” in media.

Wrongfully deported Kilmar Abrego Garcia released from Tennessee jail

Kilmar Abrego Garcia, who was wrongfully deported by the administration of United States President Donald Trump, has been released from a jail in Tennessee.

Abrego Garcia was released on Friday and will rejoin his family in Maryland while he awaits the beginning of a trial based on allegations of human smuggling by the Trump administration, according to his lawyer.

The detention of Abrego Garcia, who remained held in an El Salvador prison known for abusive conditions even after the government admitted he had been mistakenly deported, became a flashpoint in the Trump administration’s push for mass deportations with little semblance of due process.

The government, faced with a court order, brought Abrego Garcia back to the US in June, despite previously claiming it had no authority to do so. Upon his return, the Trump administration announced criminal charges against him for alleged human smuggling.

Abrego Garcia, whom the Trump administration previously tried to link to the criminal group MS-13 through disproven claims, has denied the charges. His lawyers have depicted the criminal charges as a form of punishment for speaking out against his wrongful deportation and embarrassing the administration.

While he was previously cleared for pre-trial release from the Tennessee jail, his lawyers requested that he be allowed to remain there out of concern that the government would move to deport him again if he was released.

Those fears have slightly eased after a recent, separate court ruling that said the government must allow Abrego Garcia to challenge a deportation order. His lawyers filed a motion for dismissal of the criminal case, arguing that it is a form of retaliation from the government.

An immigration judge rejected Abrego Garcia’s application for asylum in 2019, but ruled that he could not be deported to El Salvador due to a “well-founded fear” of violence in that country.

Chicago ‘will be next’: Trump teases troop expansion in Democrat-led cities

President Donald Trump has hinted he plans to expand his domestic troop deployment to other Democrat-led cities in the United States, starting with the midwestern metropolis of Chicago, Illinois.

Trump’s warning arrived shortly after the Department of Defence confirmed to US media that the National Guard troops currently patrolling Washington, DC, will now be carrying weapons.

In a statement on Friday, the Pentagon said the decision came directly from Trump’s defence secretary, Pete Hegseth.

“Members supporting the mission to lower the crime rate in our Nation’s capital will soon be on mission with their service-issued weapons, consistent with their mission and training,” the statement said.

Trump had called up the National Guard on August 11 to address crime in Washington, DC, dismissing nonpartisan data from the Metropolitan Police Department that shows violent crime in the city at a 30-year low.

The city had seen an uptick in murder and other crimes after the COVID-19 pandemic began, but since 2023, violent crime has fallen by 35 percent, according to the police statistics.

Trump, however, renewed his attacks against the city’s leadership on Friday and once again threatened to take over the local government. He has already federalised the local police force, a power he can exert for a period of 30 days.

“It was a crime-infested rat hole, and they do have a lot of rats,” Trump said of Washington, DC, during a meeting with reporters and FIFA football federation president Gianni Infantino at the White House.

Threats against DC Mayor Bowser

He specifically called out Washington, DC, Mayor Muriel Bowser, a Democrat, warning she could lose her democratically elected post.

“I’m tired of listening to these people say how safe it was before we got here,” Trump said. “It was unsafe. It was horrible. And Mayor Bowser had better get her act straight, or she won’t be mayor very long because we’ll take it over with the federal government and run it like it’s supposed to be run.”

Critics have voiced concern that such a move would further disenfranchise the voters of Washington, DC, and legal experts warn that Trump may run afoul of the law if he attempts to seize control of the city.

The federal government already wields significant power over the affairs of the capital. But under the Home Rule Act of 1973, a local government — with a mayor and city council — was set up to manage the city’s day-to-day policies, though Congress retained the right to review and reject local laws.

It is not clear how Trump could singlehandedly overturn the Home Rule Act, barring an act of Congress.

Still, Washington, DC’s unique status as the nation’s capital has allowed Trump to deploy the National Guard more freely there than he could in other parts of the country.

Earlier this month, the Trump administration faced trial for its use of the National Guard to quell demonstrations last June in Los Angeles, California.

State and local officials have argued that the move not only violated the law, but also ignited tensions between protesters and law enforcement.

In explaining California’s case against the Trump administration, state Attorney General Rob Bonta cited the Posse Comitatus Act of 1878, which bars the use of the country’s military for domestic law enforcement.

“Two months ago, the federal government deployed military troops to the streets of Los Angeles for the purposes of political theater and public intimidation,” Bonta said in a news release. “This dangerous move has no precedent in American history.”

Expanding troop deployments to Chicago

But Trump has advanced the idea that he will continue to deploy the National Guard to other parts of the country, in the name of combating crime.

“After we do this, we’ll go to another location, and we’ll make it safe also. We’re going to make our country very safe. We’re going to make our cities very, very safe,” Trump said, before turning his attention to one city in particular.

“Chicago’s a mess. You have an incompetent mayor. Grossly incompetent. And we’ll straighten that one out probably next. That’ll be our next one after this. And it won’t even be tough.”

He also named other cities he would like to “clean up” with federal troop intervention.

“I think Chicago will be next, and then we’ll help with New York,” Trump said at one point on Friday. At another, he hinted he might be inclined to once again deploy the National Guard to California.

“Now, you look at what the Democrats have done to San Francisco; they’ve destroyed it,” Trump said. “It’s just different. We can clean that up, too. We’ll clean that one up, too.”

Any of those proposed efforts, should they materialise, would likely face challenges under the Posse Comitatus Act.

Already, some mayors have responded to the idea that their city could be the next stop for Trump’s anti-crime campaign.

“If President Trump wants to help make Chicago safer, he can start by releasing the funds for anti-violence programs that have been critical to our work to drive down crime and violence,” Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson said in a statement earlier this month.

“Sending in the national guard would only serve to destabilize our city and undermine our public safety efforts.”

As Trump faces the end of the 30-day window for his control of the Washington, DC, police force, he has indicated that he might try to circumvent the deadline by declaring the capital’s crime a “national emergency”.

“ I don’t know if there is a deadline because if I declare a national emergency, which this was, that ends the deadline,” Trump said.