Afghanistan rejects US return to Bagram airbase

President Donald Trump’s request for the US military to return to Afghanistan and reclaim the Bagram airbase has been rejected.

Kabul is ready to engage, according to a representative from the foreign ministry, but the US will not be permitted to re-establish a military presence in the central Asian nation, according to a statement posted on social media on Friday.

Recommended Stories

list of 3 itemsend of list

Trump claimed on Thursday that his administration is pressing for “regaining” Bagram as a base. The US president noted that because of its close proximity to China, its position is crucially important. He has long expressed his desire to reclaim the facility.

Trump stated, “We’re trying to get it back.” He rebuffed the claim, noting that Bagram is “exactly one hour away from where China manufactures its nuclear missiles” and that “we gave it to the Taliban for nothing.”

Officials from the Taliban, however, refrained from putting it to use.

Without the United States having a military presence in any of Afghanistan, Zakir Jalal, a member of the foreign ministry, stated on social media that “Afghanistan and the United States need to engage with one another.”

According to him, Kabul is willing to pursue “mutual respect and shared interests” in the pursuit of political and economic ties with Washington.

During its two-decade occupation of Afghanistan, Bagram, which was located north of Kabul and housed a notorious prison, was the site of US military operations.

During the so-called “war on terror,” the United States also imprisoned thousands of people there for years without being charged with any crime or facing charges, and many of them were tortured or abused.

Following the US withdrawal and the fall of the Afghan government, the Taliban reclaimed control of the facility in 2021.

Trump has argued that Washington should have kept a small force because of the base’s proximity to China and not because of Afghanistan.

Trump’s most recent statements come as he for the first time confirmed that his administration had spoken with Taliban officials.

Amir Khan Muttaqi and Zalmay Khalilzad, the special hostage envoy of the US, met over the weekend in Kabul with Amir Khan Khalilzad, the country’s foreign minister. Apparently, discussions centered on American citizens who were detained in Afghanistan.

According to reports cited by the US media outlet CNN, US officials have been considering re-establishing a presence at Bagram since at least March.

Trump and his advisers contend that the airfield might give him access to Afghanistan’s tidy mineral resources as well as give him leverage over security.

Bali court hands Ukrainian man life sentence for illegal drugs laboratory

‘We will stay’: Displaced Nigerians fear Boko Haram, stay in closing camps

Maiduguri, Nigeria – Four months after authorities evacuated 22,000 people and dismantled its water supply, the Muna displaced persons camp in Maiduguri is a shell of what it once was. But Maryam Suleiman, a 50-year-old widow, has refused to leave.

Suleiman and her 12 children still sleep beneath leaking roofs of the camp in Nigeria’s northeastern Borno State, even as the structures crumble around them.

Recommended Stories

list of 3 itemsend of list

“They gave us options to stay or return home,” the mother tells Al Jazeera, standing in what remains of the site that housed her family for a decade. “But they’re still killing people there.”

Her hometown of Dongo in the Mafa local government area – 49km (30 miles) from Maiduguri – is where Boko Haram fighters murdered her two younger brothers in 2014. It is also where the government insists she must return, declaring the area safe from the group that has killed 15,889 people and displaced 3.9 million across northeastern Nigeria.

Suleiman is among hundreds who refused evacuation when Borno State Governor Babagana Umara Zulum ordered all camps closed in 2023, citing improved security and the need to “restore dignity” to displaced populations.

Yet in May 2025, just months after resettlement began, Boko Haram launched fresh attacks in Marte, killing five soldiers at a military base. Similar incidents followed in Dikwa, Rann, Gajiram, and other “safe” communities.

According to the Daily Trust newspaper, more than 90 people have been killed in the past five months across Borno State. The Marte attack alone forced 20,000 newly resettled residents to flee again.

“I remember those days, our community was rich in agricultural produce,” Suleiman recalls of life before 2009, when Boko Haram began its violent campaign against Western education. “People from Maiduguri travelled to our community to trade. I can’t recall visiting Maiduguri because I had everything I wanted in my village.”

The armed group’s violence escalated after Nigerian forces killed its founder, Mohammed Yusuf, in 2009. His deputy, Abubakar Shekau, unleashed attacks on civilians, infrastructure, and security forces that would reshape Nigeria’s northeast for the next decade.

Now, in the skeletal remains of Muna camp, Suleiman shares a single room with 15 people. Her children, once enrolled in school, no longer attend classes.

“We hardly eat unless we go out in search for food,” she says. “The government and NGOs removed everything when they closed the camp.”

The remains of the Muna camp for displaced persons in Maiduguri, where hundreds like Maryam Suleiman still live despite official closure orders [Kurutsi Bitrus/Egab]

A dangerous return

Donoma Gamtayi, an elderly farmer from Marte, watches from the camp’s crumbling entrance as military vehicles pass on the road to his hometown.

“Boko Haram still operates,” he tells Al Jazeera. “They come once in a while. When they kidnap, they demand ransom – sometimes up to two million naira ($1,337).”

Like many in the camp, Gamtayi wants to farm again, but not at the cost of his life.

“If security forces are placed in the affected communities, we will have confidence to survive in resettlement areas. We can spend some hours in safe locations.”

Nigerian security analyst Kabir Adamu believes there is merit to the government’s drive to get people to return to their regular lives, but warns that the present security setup still makes villagers vulnerable, especially outside major towns where the military has formed garrisons.

“Sometimes they’re forced to pay ransom to Boko Haram or Islamic State West Africa Province fighters,” he says.

This creates a devastating cycle. Those who engage in such acts are, in effect, supporting “terrorism” in the eyes of the state and risk arrest by the Nigerian government. Yet for many, it is the only option they see for survival.

Governor Zulum justified the camp closures by citing rising prostitution, gangsterism, and child abuse within settlements for internally displaced persons (IDPs).

“Living in IDP camps is not what we are used to or what we like as a people,” he stated. “We believe that a safe life of dignity is a right for all citizens of Borno.

“Boko Haram can never be eradicated without resettlement. People have to go back to their homes and earn their livelihood.”

But humanitarian workers paint a different picture. In August, the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) warned that 4.5 million people in northeastern Nigeria need humanitarian assistance, half of them children.

“In Borno, Adamawa, and Yobe states, 2.5 million children are at risk of acute malnutrition,” says UNICEF Nigeria representative Wafaa Elfadil Saeed Abdelatef. Although Borno is the epicentre of the Boko Haram insurgency, the other two states have also been targeted by fighters. “Families are skipping meals, children are wasting away, and mothers are arriving at feeding centres with babies hanging between life and death,” Abdelatef says.

From January to June this year, UNICEF and its partners reached 1.3 million people with health services, treated 340,000 children for severe acute malnutrition, provided 185,000 people with safe water, and supported more than 500,000 out-of-school children in returning to classrooms in northeastern Nigeria, according to Abdelatef.

She noted that while these are lifesaving results, “the reality is that needs are rising faster than the response, and more must be done collectively”.

Nigeria
Maryam Suleiman, a widow, lives in Muna camp with her 12 children [Kurutsi Bitrus/Egab]

Trapped between fear and hunger

The complexity of forced returns extends beyond immediate security threats, Adamu notes.

“Food scarcity is a major issue in resettled areas due to destroyed agricultural systems and limited humanitarian aid,” he says. “Places like Dikwa and Monguno have extremely high malnutrition rates.”

Psychological trauma compounds the crisis. Many displaced people have endured severe distress during years of displacement, and resettling them without adequate psychosocial support only worsens their mental state, making reintegration nearly impossible.

“When IDPs are resettled without proper advocacy with host communities, it leads to conflict over land, water, and economic opportunities,” Adamu adds. “We’ve seen this in Pulka, where there’s fierce competition for limited resources.”

Garba Uda’a, another camp resident, tells Al Jazeera that life in Muna has become much like it was when people first arrived, with no means to start a business or farm.

“We were left behind after the resettlement exercise,” he says. “Yes, we are afraid, but they should support us no matter how little, because we don’t have anything.”

He explains, “The farming season has already passed for us to plant anything that could sustain us. We remain here because the economic situation in the country is not making it easy for us.”

For now, Suleiman has made her choice. If the government will resettle her somewhere else – anywhere safe – she will start a provisions shop, she says. She knows how to run a business, how to support her family.

But not in Dongo. Not where her brothers’ blood still stains her memory. Not where Boko Haram fighters still emerge from the forest to collect their terrible tax.

As dusk falls over Muna camp, she prepares the floor where her children will sleep tonight. The roof may leak, the toilets may not work, and hunger gnaws at their stomachs.

But they are alive.

“Until news of bloodshed sounds strange in our ears,” she says, “we will stay.”

This article is published in collaboration with Egab.

Nigeria
The remains of the Muna camp for displaced people [Kurutsi Bitrus/Egab]

US Senate approves 48 Trump nominees in a single vote

Following a recent rule change that allows the chamber to approve lower-level appointments in batches rather than just once, the United States Senate confirmed 48 of President Donald Trump’s nominees for government positions.

Kimberly Guilfoyle, a former FOX News host and Donald Trump Jr. fiancee, was named as the US Ambassador to Greece on Thursday.

Recommended Stories

list of 4 itemsend of list

Additionally, Callista Gingrich, the wife of conservative political pundit Newt Gingrich, was appointed ambassador to Switzerland and Liechtenstein. During Trump’s first administration, she previously served as the US’s Holy See.

Additionally, the Senate, which is controlled by Republicans, approved numerous nominations for US ambassadors to Argentina and Sweden as well as for defense, energy, labor, and interior.

The Trump administration, which has struggled to secure approval for more than 100 appointees despite persistent opposition from Democrats, has been described in the US media as a significant victory.

Senate Majority Leader John Thune credited a change in rules last week to “overcome Democrats’ historic obstruction” of the nomination process with facilitating the vote.

According to The Associated Press news agency, the Senate can now approve lower-level nominations with a simple majority in accordance with the new regulations.

For higher-level positions, including judicial and cabinet nominations, the old rules still apply.

According to Thune, the approval of even uncontroversial civilian nominations has become a more contentious process for presidents in recent years. They were once approved by almost unanimous consent or “voice vote,” a simple measure of vocal approval.

Thune, who accused Democrats of “delay for delay’s sake,” told the Senate on Thursday, “President Trump is] the first president on record to have a civilian nominee confirmed by unanimous consent or voice vote.”

In a post on Truth Social in August, the president told Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer to “GO TO HELL” during a Senate recess. Democrats were against Trump’s nominations for government positions because they were “historically bad,” according to Schumer at the time.