First aid trucks enter Gaza on Day 1 of ceasefire deal

NewsFeed

In order to implement the ceasefire agreement between Israel and Hamas, the first trucks carrying humanitarian aid entered Gaza via the Rafah crossing. Every day, hundreds of trucks are expected to arrive, providing Palestinians who are desperately in need of fuel and food.

What does the resilience of Gaza’s people tell the world?

Ceasefire comes after 15 months of Israel’s devastating war on the Palestinian territory.

A sense of hope is arriving in Gaza with Sunday’s ceasefire, coming after nearly 47, 000 people were killed by Israeli attacks and Western weapons.

Many of the homes and lives of Palestinians, many of which were destroyed by the bombing, are now attempting to rebuild them.

How has the spirit of Gaza’s people remained unbroken?

Presenter:

Hani Mahmoud

Guests:

Read Nejm, a professor of political science and international relations from Gaza.

Antoine Renard – Gaza director, World Food Programme

Man Utd suffer 3-1 loss to Brighton as Onana error compounds misery

Following a 3-1 home defeat to Brighton in the Premier League, Manchester United’s season has gotten even more tense.

At Old Trafford on Sunday, Yankuba Minteh, Kaoru Mitoma, and Georginio Rutter scored to send United to their 10th defeat in the league, causing United to endure a miserable defeat.

United were denied by a howler from goalkeeper Andre Onana, who pour a routine gather from a low cross into the box, which allowed Rutter to tap home the loose ball.

Under new head coach Ruben Amorim, the record 20-time English champions were eliminated in their seventh straight defeat, which highlighted the enormous work the Portuguese manager has done.

Brighton &amp, Hove Albion’s Georginio Rutter celebrates scoring his team’s third goal]Lee Smith/Action Images via Reuters]

Brighton climbed to ninth place with 34 points, four points off the top four. United are 13th on 26, also from 22 games.

On their last three trips to Old Trafford, Brighton have won six of their last seven league games against United.

In honor of club legend Denis Law, who passed away this week, the teams were led out by bagpipes, and former manager Alex Ferguson laid a wreath in the center circle.

Soccer Football - Premier League - Manchester United v Brighton & Hove Albion - Old Trafford, Manchester, Britain - January 19, 2025 Former Manchester United manager Alex Ferguson holds a wreath in memory of former Manchester United player Denis Law Action Images via Reuters/Lee Smith EDITORIAL USE ONLY. NO USE WITH UNAUTHORIZED AUDIO, VIDEO, DATA, FIXTURE LISTS, CLUB/LEAGUE LOGOS OR 'LIVE' SERVICES. ONLINE IN-MATCH USE LIMITED TO 120 IMAGES, NO VIDEO EMULATION. NO USE IN BETTING, GAMES OR SINGLE CLUB/LEAGUE/PLAYER PUBLICATIONS. PLEASE CONTACT YOUR ACCOUNT REPRESENTATIVE FOR FURTHER DETAILS..
Denis Law memorialized by former Manchester United manager Alex Ferguson [Lee Smith/Active Images via Reuters]

After five minutes, Mitoma broke the offside trap left from Carlos Baleba’s long ball and his cross gave the unmarked Minteh a straightforward finish.

When Brighton made an effort to play the ball out of defense in the first half, United won the penalty, but Joshua Zirkzee received the ball in the box after Bart Verbruggen’s pass was poor.

Baleba put his arm on the shoulder of the striker, who went to ground. Fernandes slotted home to level the score after Referee Peter Bankes pointed the finger at the spot.

Seven minutes into the second period, United missed a low free kick into the box and Pedro scored. Brighton thought they were back in the lead. However, a VAR inspection revealed that Diogo Dalot had allegedly kicked Jan Paul van Hecke’s foot during the melee.

However, the visitors did score again on the hour when Mitoma curled past United defender Noussair Mazraoui to turn in Minteh’s warm cross.

After Brighton equalized, Onana’s horrifying error gave the hosts a third goal, leaving United to reflect on their 10th league defeat.

Hamas releases first three Israeli captives as Gaza ceasefire takes hold

As part of the Gaza Strip’s ceasefire agreement, Hamas handed over the first three female captives, according to Israeli authorities.

Israeli military spokesman Daniel Hagari said on Sunday evening that 24-year-old Romi Gonen, 28-year-old Emily Damari, and 31-year-old Doron Steinbrecher were handed over to the Red Cross and are “in safe hands” in Israel.

After Hamas brought the captives to as-Saraya Square, the Red Cross vehicles left Gaza City and entered the heavily besieged northern part of the city as a crowd gathered.

90 Palestinian prisoners were being detained by a Red Cross team before being released from Ofer Prison in Israel as part of the cease-fire agreement.

The ceasefire agreement will be implemented in three phases, including bringing in more humanitarian aid trucks into Gaza to help the area’s disaster. As Israeli forces leave some of Gaza, the first stage will last 42 days.

Abu Obeida, a spokesman for the Hamas military, stated in a televised speech that the Palestinian organization is committed to the agreement, but that its continued application will depend on Israel’s reciprocity.

He claimed that a deal could have been reached more than a year ago but was thwarted by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s “malicious ambitions.”

The Israeli leader has vowed to fight despite the resignation of some far-right lawmakers from his government, which is led by National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir. After the release of the first captives, Netanyahu emphasized that Israel will pursue all of its war goals, including “defeating” Hamas and releasing all of the captives.

Former US President Joe Biden said “guns in Gaza have gone silent” and welcomed the ceasefire with international attention.

After more than 15 months of deadly Israeli attacks that have claimed the lives of more than 46, 000 Palestinians and thousands of others, thousands of Palestinians have flocked to the long-awaited ceasefire, which may help the situation in Gaza.

Reporting from as-Saraya Square, Al Jazeera’s Ibrahim Khalili described scenes of joy among the crowd.

“They are beyond happy”, he said. After 15 months of fighting that destroyed everything, celebrations are taking place all over. This is a historic moment”.

The captives are scheduled to be immediately taken to an Israeli military facility for identification and then airlifted to a hospital in the country’s center. After being reunited with their families, they will be there for at least four days for psychological and medical evaluations.

This week, Israeli forces and the prison services reported how they had been getting ready to release the prisoners.

Trucks carrying aid wait at the Rafah border crossing between Egypt and the Gaza Strip, amid a ceasefire between Israel and Hamas, in Rafah, Egypt, January 19, 2025]Mohamed Abd El Ghany/Reuters]

During the Hamas-led attack in southern Israel on October 7, 2023, about 250 people were taken. Approximately 100 of Gaza’s captives are still there even though it is unknown how many of them are still alive after their bodies were recovered in late 2023.

The three Israeli prisoners who will be freed in exchange for 90 Palestinian prisoners have been identified by Al Jazeera.

The list, which includes mostly women and a few children, includes all of the people who are currently occupied West Bank and East Jerusalem.

The Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine in the occupied West Bank, Khalida Jarrar, is named among the list’s names. Others on the list include at least 12 young Palestinian men, some of them under 19 years of age, and minors.

Numerous children and minors have been detained for allegedly throwing rocks at Israeli forces, according to Al Jazeera’s Nida Ibrahim.

“We are talking about light sentences”, she said. The list of prisoners, the hundreds of names that have been released, largely serve administrative detention, which is a tactic employed by Israeli policy to keep prisoners imprisoned indefinitely without being charged. These administrative detentions keep getting renewed.

One more broken promise to close Guantanamo

I spent 14 years imprisoned at the Guantanamo detention facility, but I never faced criminal charges. When I was 19 years old, I was assigned there. I didn’t know why I was being held, what I had done to be imprisoned, or when I would be released.

I backed the American forces’ commitment to upholding their own ideals of justice and legality, and that I would be able to defend myself and establish my innocence like many other men who were detained at Guantanamo. That never happened.

Instead, I was subjected to torture and continual harassment. After 14 years, I fought for human rights and human rights, and I was freed. I had the idea that one day the world would find out what had happened to us and demand accountability and justice while I was imprisoned. I believed that if people knew, they would end this miserable place.

Nearly nine years have passed since my release. I have continued to write and speak in interviews about what has happened all this time. The world knows, and yet, Guantanamo is still functioning.

Earlier this month, we marked the 23rd anniversary of its creation. We are approaching the end of a US president’s term that he had promised to end. One has to wonder after all the reports by the United Nations and various human rights organisations, media reports, documentaries, books, etc – why is this symbol of injustice still standing?

Following the tragic event that shook the world, Guantanamo established itself. In its wake, the US launched the so-called global “war on terror”, a campaign ostensibly aimed at combating terrorism but which, in reality, legalised torture, undermined international law, and dehumanised an entire faith community.

Guantanamo detention center, which is located on the island of Cuba, was purposefully constructed to avoid international norms and constitutional protections, making it a place where detainees could be held indefinitely without facing charges or trials.

Indefinite detention is a direct assault on justice principles. The very foundation of legal systems is the practice of holding people without charge or trial. Detainees are subject to years, sometimes decades, of suffering without any apparent resolution because of it.

Guantanamo became a blueprint for other forms of extrajudicial detention, torture, and human rights abuses worldwide. The proliferation of CIA black sites, the normalization of Islamophobia, and the deterioration of international standards intended to safeguard human dignity all demonstrate the prison’s legacy.

Guantanamo is the most infamous symbol of the global war on terror, institutionalizing practices that dehumanize Muslims. It fuelled Islamophobic rhetoric, justified invasive surveillance programmes, and stigmatised entire communities as potential threats.

The US took the lead on all this, and many states followed suit, using US “war on terror” rhetoric to justify attacks on whole communities. Muslim and other under-represented groups have suffered the most as a result.

At its peak, Guantanamo held&nbsp, approximately 680&nbsp, men and boys, many of whom had been sold as “terrorists” to US forces in exchange for renumeration. I was affected by this.

As of today, 15 men remain in Guantanamo. Some have been released, but they continue to languish in limbo, a sign that US institutions are failing to uphold even the most fundamental human rights. Every day is a continuation of psychological and physical torment for these men, a state of being neither free nor formally accused.

Guantanamo will be closed for the past 16 years, according to numerous reports. In 2009, US President Barack Obama famously swore an executive order to require the facility’s closure in his second day in office. Then-Vice President Joe Biden&nbsp, was standing right next to him, applauding. Biden both made and broke the same promise when he became president in 2021.

The prison still costs about $ 540 million annually.

Guantanamo continues to operate, leaving the US with a moral stumbling legacy. It stands as a glaring contradiction of the ideals of liberty, justice, and human rights that the US claims to champion. Its existence undermines authoritarian regimes’ credibility around the world and makes them more willing to defend their own crimes.

I wait for the international community to wake up and demand action to end the military prison, bring justice to its victims, and hold those responsible for its creation and perpetuity accountable every year. Every year I am disappointed.

More than just a crime against its detainees and their families, Guantanamo Military Prison is. For over two decades, it has symbolised systematic torture, arbitrary detention, and the weakening of the global human rights regime. Guantanamo violates the Geneva Conventions and uses systematically to abuse primarily Muslim detainees in ways that entail crimes against humanity.

As a new administration takes office in Washington, I have the same message for them as I had for their predecessors:

Close Guantanamo. Stop the indefinite detention practice and shut down the facility.

Secure justice. Give the rest of the candidates fair trials and release those who have been transferred.

Ensure accountability. Investigate and hold accountable those responsible for authorising torture, extrajudicial detention, and other abuses.

Acknowledge and apologise. Accept and express regret for the injustices committed.

Provide reparations. Former prisoners are to be compensated for the harm they suffered.

Shuttering Guantanamo is more than just about ending a physical location; it also symbolizes ending a dark period in history. It’s about reaffirming the principles of justice, dignity, and human rights that should be upheld for all people, regardless of their origin or beliefs. Guantanamo must not see another anniversary.

Syrian minister rejects Kurdish-led SDF’s proposal for own military bloc

Syria’s new defense minister has stated that maintaining their own bloc within the more comprehensively integrated Syrian armed forces would not be acceptable for Kurdish fighters supported by the US.

Murhaf Abu Qasra told the Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF) that the Kurdish-led organization was putting off the complex issue in a statement to Reuters news agency on Sunday.

The SDF, which has carved out a semi-autonomous region through 14 years of conflict, has been in talks with the new Damascus administration led by former rebels who resurrected President Bashar al-Assad on December 8th.

According to SDF commander Mazloum Abdi, who also served as Mazloum Kobani, one of their main demands is a decentralized administration, saying in an interview with Saudi Arabia’s Asharq News that the organization was open to integrating with the Ministry of Defense but as a “military bloc” and without dissolving.

On Sunday, Abu Qasra rejected that suggestion.

We claim that they would be distributed militarily within the Defence Ministry, according to Abu Qasra, who was appointed defense minister on December 21.

However, such a bloc within a large institution as the Defence Ministry is unacceptable for them to continue to operate as a military bloc.

One of the minister’s priorities since taking office has been integrating Syria’s myriad anti-al-Assad factions into a unified command structure.

However, doing so with the SDF has proved challenging. The group is seen as a key ally for ISIL (ISIS), but neighboring Turkiye views it as a threat to national security due to its banned Kurdistan Workers Party (PKK) as its main ally.

Abu Qasra claimed he had met with the SDF leaders but that they had been “procrastinating” during discussions about their integration. He added that the Syrian state had a right to enlist them in the Defence Ministry like other former rebel groups.

About two weeks after Hayat Tahrir al-Sham, the rebel group he belongs to, led the offensive that overthrew al-Assad, he was appointed to the transitional government.

The minister stated that he hoped to complete the transitional government’s transitional process by March 1, when some senior military figures are expected to take over.

When asked how he had responded to criticism that a transitional council shouldn’t set up such vast military installations or make such appointments, he claimed “security issues” had given the new state precedence.

“We are in a race against time and every day makes a difference”, he said.

The new administration was also criticised over its decision to give some foreigners, including Egyptians and Jordanians, ranks in the new military.