Slider1
Slider2
Slider3
Slider4
previous arrow
next arrow

Russia’s Shadow on Africa

Russia’s presence in Africa – stabilising force or template for its expanding influence over the continent?

A stabilising force enhancing the sovereignty of African nations – or the focal point for increasing Russian influence across the continent?

This documentary is an exploration of Russian President Vladimir Putin’s strategic ambitions in Africa, seen through the prism of the Central African Republic (CAR). At the Second Russia-Africa Summit in St Petersburg in July 2023, Putin announced military agreements with more than 40 African countries. The agreements have already started to reshape geopolitical relationships and have significant implications for local populations. Russian paramilitary organisation the Wagner Group has been in the CAR since 2018, and while some support its presence, independent investigations have reported terrible human rights abuses with little or no accountability.

This film includes insights from former Wagner commander Marat Gabidullin, French political analyst Emmanuel Dupuy, and an adviser to CAR President Faustin-Archange Touadera. They shed light on the complex situation in the CAR – a combination of military engagement, resource exploitation and geopolitical manoeuvring – and how it’s becoming a template for Russia’s expanding influence in Africa.

Hamas says three captives to be released amid ceasefire deal collapse fears

Hamas says it is committed to the release of captives held in Gaza according to a timeline set out in a ceasefire, days after fears arose that the truce would not hold following Israel’s violation of the agreement.

In a statement released on Thursday, Hamas said it “confirms continuation in implementing the agreement in accordance with what was signed, including the exchange of prisoners according to the specified timetable”.

Hamas spokesperson Abdul Latif al-Qanoua also confirmed to the Anadolu news agency that the group will release captives on Saturday if Israel adheres to the terms of the ceasefire.

“The [Israeli] occupation has violated the agreement multiple times, whether by preventing the return of displaced people or blocking the entry of humanitarian aid,” he said. “If Israel does not adhere to the terms of the agreement, the prisoner exchange process will not take place.”

A Palestinian source quoted by AFP news agency said on Thursday that mediators had obtained from Israel a “promise … to put in place a humanitarian protocol starting from this morning” that would allow construction equipment and temporary housing into the devastated territory.

The Hamas statement added that talks being held this week in Cairo aimed at overcoming an impasse in implementing the deal had been “positive”.

Later on Thursday, Israel said Hamas must release three living captives on Saturday or Israel will return to war.

This week, the agreement with Israel has come under severe strain.

Hamas warned it would delay the next release of captives scheduled for Saturday due to Israel violating the truce by shooting Palestinians in Gaza and not allowing the agreed-upon number of tents, shelters and other vital aid to enter the besieged enclave.

Israel responded by saying that if Hamas failed to free captives according to the schedule, it would resume its war.

Since the ceasefire went into effect on January 19, Israeli forces have killed at least 92 Palestinians and wounded more than 800, according to the Palestinian Ministry of Health.

A Hamas delegation arrived in Cairo on Wednesday to discuss the ceasefire with mediators Egypt and Qatar.

Egyptian state-linked media said heavy equipment and trucks carrying mobile homes were ready to enter Gaza from Egypt on Thursday. The AFP news agency shared images showing a row of bulldozers on the Egyptian side of the border.

However, Israel later said they would not be allowed to enter through the crossing.

“There is no entry of caravans or heavy equipment into the Gaza Strip, and there is no coordination for this,” Omer Dostri, a spokesperson for Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, wrote on X, adding: “No goods are allowed to enter the Gaza Strip through the Rafah crossing.”

Bulldozers and trucks carrying caravans wait to enter Gaza at the Rafah border crossing between Egypt and Gaza [Mohamed Arafat/AP Photo]

Hamas has previously accused Israel of holding up the delivery of heavy machinery needed to clear the vast amounts of rubble across the enclave.

United States President Donald Trump had warned this week that “hell” would break loose if Hamas failed to release “all” the remaining captives by noon (10:00 GMT) on Saturday.

If fighting resumes, Israeli Defence Minister Israel Katz said: “The new Gaza war … will not end without the defeat of Hamas and the release of all the hostages.”

“It will also allow the realisation of US President Trump’s vision for Gaza,” he added.

Trump, whose return to the White House has emboldened the Israeli far right, caused a global outcry over his proposal for the US to take over the Gaza Strip and move its 2.3 million residents to Egypt or Jordan.

Lantern Festival celebrated with lights, rice dumplings in Taiwan and China

Thousands of people in Taiwan and China celebrated the Lantern Festival by releasing paper lanterns into the night sky, visiting light installations and snacking on glutinous rice dumplings.

The Chinese Lantern Festival marks the end of Chinese New Year celebrations and symbolises the coming of spring.

At the Pingxi Sky Lantern Festival in northern Taiwan, thousands lined up in the rain to light up and observe wish lanterns.

Villagers in Taiwan started using paper lanterns more than a century ago to signify to others it was safe to return after bandits raided their communities. Today, the lanterns carry hopes of peace and prosperity in the New Year.

A total of nine waves of lantern releases were interspersed with music and dance performances as part of the festival. The stars of the show were a pair of 3.6-metre (12-foot) pink and golden snake-shaped lanterns, in a nod to the Year of the Snake.

People in China also celebrated the Lantern Festival, although no officially organised event there sees the release of large amounts of paper lanterns.

Instead, Beijing residents queued for glutinous rice dumplings – the festival’s most sought-after snack – and visited light shows across the city. The largest among them, at the Beijing Garden Expo Park, in the city’s suburbs, displayed more than 10,000 installations of various sizes and designs.

Champions Trophy 2025: Is this Pakistan sport’s moment to shine, finally?

Islamabad, Pakistan – Almost three decades ago, on March 17, 1996, Sri Lankan captain Arjuna Ranatunga deftly and calmly guided Australian fast bowler Glenn McGrath’s delivery to third man as Lahore’s Gaddafi Stadium erupted in applause from more than 30,000 – mostly Pakistani – fans.

By successfully chasing the target of 241 runs for the loss of just three wickets, Sri Lanka not only secured their first-ever Cricket World Cup victory, it was the first time a host or co-host of the Cricket World Cup had won the trophy.

That was also the last time Pakistan hosted a major global cricket event, alongside India and Sri Lanka.

Now that 29-year wait is finally coming to an end as Pakistan is set to welcome at least seven of the world’s top teams for the ICC Champions Trophy, which is scheduled to begin on February 19. Pakistan had won the tournament the last time it was played in 2017.

With 15 matches in total, Pakistan will face New Zealand in the tournament’s opening match in Karachi, while the final is set for March 9.

The event features the top eight men’s teams – Australia, Afghanistan, Bangladesh, England, India, New Zealand, Pakistan, and South Africa – based on International Cricket Council (ICC) rankings.

India, the biggest and most influential cricketing nation, announced in November last year that its team would not travel to Pakistan, in line with its government’s policy since the 2008 Mumbai attacks.

In a compromise reached among stakeholders, Pakistan agreed to host a hybrid version of the tournament, with India playing all its matches in Dubai, including the final, should they qualify.

Pakistan will still likely host 11 out of 15 matches, and the Pakistan Cricket Board (PCB) views that as a considerable achievement.

“People do not realise what an incredible challenge this was. It took countless hours of lobbying, convincing, arguments and overcoming a variety of hurdles to ensure the tournament is played in Pakistan,” a senior PCB official told Al Jazeera in a recent interview in Lahore, requesting anonymity.   

Fireworks light up the sky during the inauguration ceremony of the renovated Gaddafi Cricket Stadium in Lahore on February 7, 2025, ahead of the ICC Champions Trophy 2025 [Farooq Naeem/AFP]

‘A significant moment’

While Pakistan’s South Asian neighbours such as India, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh, and even the United Arab Emirates have hosted various ICC events over the last 15 years, the Champions Trophy in Pakistan marks a “significant moment,” says Ali Khan, an associate professor at the Lahore University of Management Sciences (LUMS).

Khan, who authored Cricket in Pakistan: Nation, Identity, and Politics in 2022, says that Pakistan once had a proud sporting history, hosting several global events across various sports, including squash, hockey and snooker, particularly in the 90s.

Besides the Cricket World Cup, Pakistan also hosted the Hockey World Cup in 1990, and hockey’s Champions Trophy in 1994, the World Amateur Snooker Championship in 1993, and the Pakistan Open was an annual feature on the global squash calendar.

But all that changed in the new millennium, as the country was gradually ostracised from global sports events due to increasing violence, following the 9/11 attacks in the United States, and the subsequent American invasion of Afghanistan in 2001.

The New Zealand cricket team was scheduled to tour the country in September 2001, but delayed the visit for a few months following the attacks, and landed in April 2002 to play a two-test series.

However, a bomb blast in a hotel in Karachi, opposite where the visitors were staying, meant that the series had to be abandoned.

Australia, too, declined to travel to Pakistan, and the scheduled tour in October the same year was instead played in Sri Lanka and Sharjah, in the UAE.

The following year, 2003, saw cricket return to the country with South African and Bangladesh tours, followed by the arrival of the Indian team for a full tour in 2004, after a gap of 15 years.

But as violence in the country increased, its impact was acutely felt on sports. The ICC Champions Trophy 2008 was scheduled to be hosted by Pakistan but security concerns and reluctance by other teams to travel meant the tournament was shifted to South Africa the following year.

The final nail in the coffin of Pakistan as a sporting host came on March 3, 2009, when Sri Lankan cricket players were attacked while travelling in their team bus to Lahore’s Gaddafi Stadium. Six policemen and two civilians lost their lives in the brazen attack, but all players and officials survived, despite sustaining injuries.

“Unfortunately, we are now not seen as a major player on the international stage, which mirrors our political landscape – very few major world leaders visit Pakistan any more. So, hosting this event in the current climate is very important for the country,” Khan said.

Veteran Indian cricket analyst and writer Sharda Ugra agreed, calling the Champions Trophy 2025 a culmination of the struggles endured by Pakistan’s cricketing community since the March 2009 attack.

And hosting big events makes a difference, she said.

“Sports, and cricket is a unifier. When you have people visiting, it helps change perceptions for those who have never been here,” Ugra told Al Jazeera.

The PCB official emphasised the tournament’s importance, not just for economic activity but also for rekindling fans’ passion for the sport. Pakistan will earn hosting fees of $6m, and hopes to make much more as a nation through ticket sales, tourism and hospitality catering to fans.

“For any country in the world, hosting an International Cricket Council (ICC) event is a major deal. A global event means you have all the eyeballs, it helps motivate fans to engage with the sport, while it also generates economic and social activities. A multilateral tournament brings together a country in ways that a bilateral series cannot,” the board official said.

Cricketer Ajantha Mendis leaves hospital.
Ajantha Mendis was one of the Sri Lankan players injured when a bus carrying the team was attacked by 12 militants wielding automatic weapons en route to Lahore’s Gaddafi Stadium, Pakistan, on March 3, 2009 [File: Nir Elias/Reuters]

Security concerns or geopolitical tensions?

For Pakistan, winning the right to host the ICC Champions Trophy 2025, announced back in November 2021, was a coup for the country’s cricketing establishment.

But the leadup to the tournament was marked by a resurgence in violent incidents, making the past 12 months the deadliest since 2016.

According to the Islamabad-based think tank Center for Research and Security Studies (CRSS), more than 2,500 people were killed in attacks last year, including nearly 700 security personnel, more than 900 civilians, and about 900 armed fighters. Most of these incidents occurred in the northwestern Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and southwestern Balochistan provinces.

The tournament, though, will be played in the three main cricket centres: Lahore, Karachi and Rawalpindi; all cleared by the ICC’s security team.

The PCB official argued that security concerns were no longer a real worry, pointing to the successful hosting of international cricketing teams in recent years and the Pakistan Super League (PSL), the country’s premier domestic T20 tournament which regularly features top international players.

“I do not agree that security is a major concern any more. It was in the past, but not now. All our major venues have been cleared by the ICC,” the official said.

Following the 2009 attack on the Sri Lankan team, Pakistan was forced to play its “home” matches at neutral venues, first in the United Kingdom, and then the UAE as a regular venue. However, as the country’s military waged a war against armed groups, international cricket gradually returned.

“From 2009 onwards, we had to take baby steps to rebuild. Each painstaking step brought us closer to where we are now,” the official added.

Former ICC and PCB chairman Ehsan Mani also believes security concerns have eased considerably.

“When I left the board, security was not a concern for visiting teams. In fact, they said there was too much security,” Mani, who stepped down in August 2021, told Al Jazeera.

Barring the two newest entrants to Test cricket, Ireland and Afghanistan, and of course India, every other Test-playing nation has visited Pakistan since 2019, including England and Australia – the two other biggest cricket markets apart from India.

But Sri Lankan writer and cricket analyst Andrew Fidel Fernando suggests the tournament’s challenges are more geopolitical than security related.

“So many teams have toured Pakistan in recent years without issues, so security is unlikely to be the real reason. This is more about geopolitics and its implications,” Fernando told Al Jazeera.

Military guards sitting in a truck.
Pakistani security personnel will be out in force during the ICC Champions Trophy 2025 [File: Muhammad Reza/Anadolu Agency via Getty Images]

India’s absence

Fernando’s reference to geopolitics highlights the tournament’s biggest controversy – India’s absence from Pakistani soil.

India’s refusal to travel has reignited debates about the ICC’s governance and whether it is beholden to cricket’s most powerful board, the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI).

Under the ICC’s latest revenue model, the BCCI is set to earn nearly $230m annually – roughly 40 percent of the ICC’s total revenue. In 2023, ICC broadcast rights for the 2024-2031 cycle generated $3.1bn from the Indian market alone, while the United Kingdom, the second-largest market, fetched just $260m.

Since the 2008 Mumbai attacks, India has refused to play bilateral series against Pakistan, and since 2009, has barred Pakistani players from participating in the lucrative Indian Premier League (IPL).

The attacks, which lasted for four days, resulted in the deaths of at least 175 people, including nine attackers. Pakistan has continued to deny any involvement in the attacks.

Despite Pakistan travelling to India several times to participate in multilateral events – including the 2023 Cricket World Cup – the BCCI said in November last year that the Indian government had not granted the team permission to travel next door to its South Asian neighbour.

It was not always like this.

Ahead of the 1996 ICC World Cup, a bombing in Colombo killed at least 91 people just two weeks before the tournament. Australia and the West Indies forfeited their matches in Sri Lanka, citing security concerns. In response, Pakistan and India sent a combined team for an exhibition match to show solidarity and to underscore that Sri Lanka was a safe country to play in.

Mani, who was on the 1996 World Cup organising committee, recalls that time as a period when the Asian cricketing bloc stood united.

“In that tournament, the ICC had minimal involvement. It was the PILCOM [a joint management committee] that ran things. Our priority was cricket,” he said.

Ugra, the Indian analyst, believes those days are long gone.

“The solidarity of the Asian bloc has evaporated, and the BCCI bears much of the responsibility. When the Western bloc was looking down upon you, you relied on your regional partners, but when things changed, you immediately moved on,” the Bangalore-based Ugra said.

Khan, the academic, pointed to the Indian board’s financial strength, as well as the political influence that the Indian government of Prime Minister Narendra Modi is widely believed to wield over the BCCI. Until last November, Jay Shah, the son of India’s powerful Home Minister Amit Shah, considered Modi’s second-in-command, was secretary of the BCCI. The junior Shah is now the ICC’s chairman.

“Indian financial strength, especially in cricket is unmatched, but the Modi-led Indian government perhaps also seemingly wants to isolate Pakistan in every sphere,” Khan said. “Pakistan, on the other hand, needs them and finds itself in a difficult spot because it needs to reach out to a country which actively dislikes you.”

Pakistan cricket
Pakistan captain Babar Azam, right, shakes hands with India captain Rohit Sharma after an Asia Cup cricket match in Sri Lanka in 2023. The teams will meet on February 23, 2025, in Dubai, UAE, rather than at the original venue in Lahore, due to India’s refusal to travel to Pakistan for the ICC Champions Trophy [Eranga Jayawardena/AP]

Is this Pakistan’s big stage?

Until late last year, uncertainty reigned over whether the tournament would even take place in Pakistan, following India’s refusal to travel. This caused delays in announcing the tournament schedule, ticketing and logistics.

Adding further ambiguity was the fact that both Gaddafi Stadium in Lahore and National Stadium in Karachi were undergoing extensive renovations, while Rawalpindi, the third venue, needed final touches, too. The combined cost of the renovations was nearly 12 billion Pakistani rupees ($43m).

Mani, the former PCB and ICC chief, squarely blamed the ICC for the “fiasco” around the Indian team’s decision not to travel.

“Why was Pakistan scrambling about these things at the 11th hour? From the time the tournament was allocated until now, the ICC could and should have talked to the BCCI to sort it out rather than wait so long. It is a complete failure on their part,” he said.

Khan, whose father, Shahryar Khan, was a former Pakistani diplomat and ex-PCB chief, said that contrary to expectations, the PCB, under chairman Mohsin Naqvi, managed to complete the stadium overhauls, which deserved praise. However, he also pointed to the “haphazard nature” of preparations.

“We have shown that the stadium can be built rapidly, and I really hope we are able to pull off the tournament with aplomb. But logistics still concern me. Ticketing issues for fans remain. There is barely any advertisement or promotion about the tournament,” said Khan.

The senior PCB official, who has been associated with the organisation for at least a decade, acknowledged the challenges faced by Pakistan but pointed to the ongoing tri-series between Pakistan, New Zealand and South Africa as proof of the stadiums’ readiness.

“Our planning is very robust. We have well-trained teams deployed at both Pakistani venues and in the UAE, and we are completely ready to host the event to the best of our abilities,” the official added.

Renovation work at the Gaddafi Stadium.
Labourers work to finalise an enclosure during renovation of the Gaddafi Stadium ahead of the ICC Champions Trophy 2025 cricket tournament, in Lahore, Pakistan, Wednesday, Jan. 29, 2025 [K.M. Chaudary/AP]

However, the official also noted that India’s refusal to travel forced Pakistan, which has a stated policy of not mixing sports with politics, to reconsider its stance. Unlike in the past, Pakistan will not travel to India for cricket matches until at least 2027: Pakistan matches supposed to be hosted by India will instead be held at neutral venues. This policy will span men’s and women’s games.

“European nations fought in both world wars, but they have learned to move past them. Similarly, we kept going to India, trying to treat sports as sports. But enough is enough, which is why we are going to change our policy. How long can we allow this treatment?” the PCB official asked.

Colombo-based Fernando, however, believes that this hybrid version of the ICC Champions Trophy is perhaps the best possible outcome for Pakistan in the circumstances.

“In previous decades, you’d say that if a team didn’t want to tour, they’d just be excluded, and someone else would step in. But broadcasters would never agree to a tournament without India. And India was never going to play in Pakistan. So, this is as close to a decent solution we could have gotten,” he said.

With less than a week until the tournament, Khan from LUMS emphasised that Pakistan needed to step up and deliver, on and off the pitch.

“Security remains the key issue during the event, so the government needs to pull out all the stops to ensure it is held safely for both fans and teams. It certainly helps to have a chairman [Mohsin Naqvi] who is also the country’s interior minister,” he said.

“But the players also need to perform on the biggest stage. They must prove themselves as quality players who should be sought after by other T20 leagues. The team needs to do well, which will enhance their reputation and increase their bankability. We have shown we can survive without playing India bilaterally, but now we need to take it to the next level.”

Cricket trophy on display.
A view shows the ICC Champions trophy during a ceremony at the Arbab Niaz Cricket Stadium in Peshawar, Pakistan February 6, 2025 [Fayaz Aziz/Reuters]

Kuwait apprehends members of international gang after cyberattacks

Authorities in Kuwait have apprehended members of an international cybercrime gang of Chinese nationality, the Ministry of the Interior has said, after large-scale attacks on telecommunication towers and financial institutions across the country.

The Cybercrime Combating Department was alerted after several telecommunication companies and banks reported cyberattacks on their networks to steal customers’ information and funds, the ministry said on Thursday in a post on X.

Officers apprehended a driver, a Chinese national, in the Farwaniya area in Kuwait City and seized multiple electronic devices in his possession. Police later found more high-tech tools at his residence.

The suspect confessed to being part of a larger network of fraudsters, who were also identified and arrested. Police also charged them for using falsified documents to forge their identities.

The ministry said it was committed to tackling cybercrime and protecting the country’s institutions from attacks, stressing that it was taking action to improve security on its networks to protect citizen’s data and financial assets.

Trump’s Gaza ‘plan’: What it is, why it’s unworkable and globally rejected

President Donald Trump ignited a firestorm of controversy with his latest remarks suggesting that the US should “take over” and “own” Gaza.

We take a look at what he proposed and reactions to it.

What has Trump said about his ‘plan’ in Gaza?

Trump has made controversial claims about Gaza, primarily around the idea that the US should take control of the territory, remove its people, and “redevelop” it.

His key points:

  • The US should “own” Gaza: He has suggested that the US should take control of Gaza to ensure stability. Palestinians should be relocated. He has proposed moving Gaza’s 2.3 million residents to Egypt and Jordan, arguing they would be “better off”.
  • Quote: “The Gaza Strip would be turned over to the US by Israel at the conclusion of fighting” between Israel and Hamas, he posted on social media. He added: “No soldiers by the US would be needed!”
  • Quote: “If we can get a beautiful area to resettle people, permanently, in nice homes where they can be happy and not be shot and not be killed and not be knifed to death like what’s happening in Gaza,” he said, not mentioning who is killing Palestinians in Gaza.
  • Quote: “I believe we will have a parcel of land in Jordan, a parcel of land in Egypt, we may have someplace else but I think when we finish our talks we’ll have a place where they’ll live very happily.”
  • Gaza should be redeveloped into the “Riviera of the Middle East” – “We have an opportunity to do something that could be phenomenal. And I don’t want to be cute. I don’t want to be a wise guy. But the Riviera of the Middle East.”
  • No Palestinian-led government – “Hamas has made it so bad, so bad, so dangerous, so unfair to people.”
  • Forced displacement: His proposal to remove Gaza’s population has been called ethnic cleansing by human rights organisations. Under international law, forcibly relocating civilians is a war crime.
  • Violation of Palestinian rights: Palestinians have a deep connection to their land, Gaza. Removing them would be a second Nakba, mirroring the ethnic cleansing of nearly one million Palestinians by Zionist gangs to clear the way for the declaration of the state of Israel in 1948.
  • Unrealistic and unworkable: The idea of removing millions of people to build a luxury resort in a war-torn area is widely seen as impractical, detached from reality and “morally unacceptable”, according to Dov Waxman, the director of the Nazarian Center for Israel Studies at UCLA.

What has the response from Gaza been?

Palestinians in Gaza have reacted with anger and rejection to Trump’s comments.

They argue that Gaza is their home and that the proposal ignores their rights and historical connection to the land.

“Where would we even go?” Imad al-Qassas, a 60-year-old father of six, said in Gaza. “Even if the border crossings were opened and voluntary migration was offered, I would never leave, no matter how difficult my situation is.”

Hamas, the governing authority in Gaza, has called Trump’s idea “ridiculous and absurd”.

Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas, whose mandate extends over parts of the occupied West Bank, said this was a “serious violation of international law”.

What has Israel’s response been?

In the same news conference where Trump made these comments, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu commended them as innovative, and that they were thought on “a much higher level” and were a path worth exploring.

Israel says Gaza poses a threat to its security, and a key objective of the ongoing war is to eliminate any potential future threats.

Could Trump do this?

No, he can’t.

Trump does not have the legal, military, or diplomatic power to enforce his idea.

No authority over Gaza: Gaza is not US territory, and the US has no jurisdiction there. Also, experts argue, the US wouldn’t commit the financial and logistical resources to do this.

Mass relocation is nearly impossible:  In Trump’s mind, it would be possible to force two million Palestinians from their land – most of whom do not want to go.

International laws condemn this:  During a Fox interview Trump said he did not plan to allow Gaza’s population to return. The involuntary deportation or displacement of a civilian population constitutes a breach of international humanitarian law.

Neighbouring countries do not agree: Egypt, Jordan and Saudi Arabia have explicitly rejected the idea, and the US can’t force them to accept it. However, Egypt and Jordan are very reliant on US aid and may need to start looking elsewhere for funding to get away from the US.

INTERACTIVE - US foreign aid to Jordan-1739358458

What are neighbouring countries saying?

Egypt: Strongly opposes any forced relocation of Palestinians. Egyptian officials said they are working on a “comprehensive vision” for the reconstruction of Gaza that does not involve displacement.

Jordan: King Abdullah II has rejected Trump’s idea. “This is the unified Arab position,” he said in a post on X. “Rebuilding Gaza without displacing the Palestinians and addressing the dire humanitarian situation should be the priority for all.”

Saudi Arabia: The Foreign Ministry said it rejected any attempts to displace the Palestinians from their land and described its stance as “clear and explicit” as well as non-negotiable.