Trump administration orders DEI employees to be put on leave

United States President Donald Trump’s administration has directed that all federal diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) staff be put on paid leave and eventually be laid off, as the Republican leader takes aim at initiatives meant to address systemic racism.

An Office of Personnel Management memo, first reported by CBS News, directed agencies to place DEI office staffers on paid leave by 5pm (22:00 GMT) on Wednesday and take down all public DEI-focused webpages by the same deadline.

Agencies must also cancel any DEI-related training and end any related contracts, and federal workers are being asked to report to the office if they suspect any DEI-related programme has been renamed to obfuscate its purpose within 10 days – or face “adverse consequences”.

By Thursday, federal agencies have been directed to compile a list of federal DEI offices and workers as of Election Day in November. They also are expected to develop a plan to execute a “reduction-in-force action” against those federal workers by next Friday.

The moves follow an executive order Trump signed on his first day in office this week ordering a sweeping dismantling of the federal government’s DEI programmes, which could touch on everything from anti-bias training to funding for minority farmers and homeowners.

Trump has called the programmes “discrimination” and insisted on restoring what he describes as strictly “merit-based” hiring.

But civil rights advocates have argued that DEI programmes are necessary to address longstanding inequities and structural racism.

Basil Smikle Jr, a political strategist and policy adviser, said he was troubled by the Trump administration’s assertion that diversity programmes were “diminishing the importance of individual merit, aptitude, hard work, and determination” because it suggested women and people of colour lacked merit or qualifications.

“There’s this clear effort to hinder, if not erode, the political and economic power of people of colour and women,” Smikle said.

“What it does is open up the door for more cronyism,” he said.

Trump’s anti-DEI push picks up where his first administration left off.

One of Trump’s final acts during his first term in 2017-2021 was an executive order banning federal agency contractors and recipients of federal funding from conducting anti-bias training that addressed concepts like systemic racism.

His successor, Democrat and former US President Joe Biden, promptly rescinded that order on his first day in office and issued a pair of executive orders — now rescinded — outlining a plan to promote DEI throughout the federal government.

While many changes may take months or even years to implement, Trump’s new anti-DEI agenda is more aggressive than his first and comes amid far more amenable terrain in the corporate world.

Trump ‘scraps’ birthright citizenship: Who will it affect?

Shortly after being sworn in as the 47th president of the United States, Donald Trump signed a host of executive orders, including a move to end birthright citizenship as part of his hardline anti-immigration agenda.

Birthright citizenship refers to a constitutionally protected right that grants automatic US citizenship to babies born in the country.

The policy has been in place for decades and is enshrined in the 14th Amendment of the US Constitution, which grants citizenship to people “born or naturalised in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. ”

But Trump has argued that the amendment does not include people whose families are non-US citizens.

Here’s what we know about Trump’s order and how many people are going to be affected:

What does the order say?

Monday’s order sets out the parameters by which a person can claim a birthright.

It states that if one parent was “unlawfully present in the United States” and the other was not a citizen or a “lawful permanent resident at the time of said person’s birth”, the child cannot claim birthright.

It adds that if a parent’s presence in the country was “lawful but temporary” through a tourist, student or work visa and the other parent was not a US citizen, birthright citizenship would not be passed on to the child.

The order will come into effect on February 19.

What is birthright citizenship?

Following the US Civil War, Congress ratified the 14th Amendment in July 1868, which stated that all people born in the country were citizens. It was aimed at establishing full citizenship rights for Black Americans who suffered under slavery.

But the amendment has been interpreted to include all children born in the US irrespective of their parents’ immigration status.

One of the most critical cases in the history of birthright citizenship came in 1898 when the Supreme Court ruled that Wong Kim Ark, born to Chinese immigrants, was a US citizen because he was born in San Francisco.

The Supreme Court ruled after the federal government tried to deny him re-entry into the country after a trip abroad under the Chinese Exclusion Act.

In 1924, Congress authorised citizenship for all Native Americans born in the United States.

“It’s ridiculous. We’re the only country in the world that does this,” Trump said on Monday after signing the order.

According to World Population Review, in 2024, at least 33 countries have birthright citizenship, predominantly in North America and Latin America, including Mexico.

How many children of immigrants have gained birthright?

According to the Pew Centre for Research, in 2022, 1. 3 million US-born adults who live with their parents were born to undocumented immigrants.

Does the exclusion include H1-B work visa holders?

Yes, the skilled professional visa falls under the umbrella of work visas and children of H1-B visa holders born in the US would not be able to claim birthright citizenship.

In 2023, 72 percent of H1-B visas, which have themselves come under criticism recently, were granted to Indian citizens, according to US Citizenship and Homeland Services.

Trump’s Make America Great Again (MAGA) base has been clamouring to end the H1-B visa, which Big Tech companies have used to hire skilled workers from abroad. Trump’s close ally, Elon Musk, has faced backlash from the MAGA camp, which accuses Big Tech firms of using the controversial visa programme to hire cheaper foreign workers at the expense of American workers.

Trump, who had tried to ban the visa programme during his first term, threw his weight behind Musk, saying, “It’s a great programme. ”

“I also like very competent people coming into our country, even if that involves them training and helping other people that may not have the qualifications they do,” he said.

However, on Tuesday, the US Department of State said that Secretary of State Marco Rubio had discussed “irregular migration” with his Indian counterpart Subrahmanyam Jaishankar. Earlier this month, India’s Ministry of External Affairs spokesperson said the visa programme benefited both the countries.

Indians formed the third-largest unauthorised immigrant population in the US at 725,000 people, according to a Pew Centre for Research report from 2022.

Bloomberg reported on Tuesday that the Indian government has told the Trump administration it will work with the US to identify and take back citizens in the country.

But the issue is going to test the strong bilateral ties between the two countries and likely affect public opinion in India, where Trump is viewed favourably due to his friendly relationship with Prime Minister Narendra Modi.

Has there been backlash following the order?

Trump’s order has faced pushback. Attorneys general from 22 US states filed lawsuits against Trump’s move to ban birthright citizenship on Tuesday.

The officials from the Democrat-led states have argued that birthright is engraved in the Constitution and cannot be changed.

“The president cannot, with a stroke of a pen, write the 14th Amendment out of existence, period,” New Jersey Attorney General Matt Platkin told The Associated Press.

Connecticut Attorney General William Tong, a US citizen by birthright and the first Chinese American elected attorney general, said the lawsuit was personal.

“The 14th Amendment says what it means, and it means what it says – if you are born on American soil, you are an American. Period. Full stop,” he said.

“There is no legitimate legal debate on this question. But the fact that Trump is dead wrong will not prevent him from inflicting serious harm right now on American families like my own,” he added.

Critics of the birthright programme say it encourages immigrants to come to the US to acquire citizenship.

Republican House Science and Technology Committee Chairman Brian Babin, who will introduce the birthright bill to Congress this week, according to Fox News, said in a statement that the bill “corrects decades of misuse”.

“Citizenship is one of our nation’s most precious privileges. By introducing this legislation, we are taking an important step to restore integrity to our immigration system and prioritise the interests of American citizens,” Babin said.

White House Deputy Press Secretary Harrison Fields also said Washington was ready to face the states in court.

“Radical Leftists can either choose to swim against the tide and reject the overwhelming will of the people, or they can get on board and work with President Trump,” Fields said.

So far, New Jersey and the two cities, as well as California, Massachusetts, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Maine, Maryland, Michigan, Minnesota, Nevada, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, Rhode Island, Vermont, and Wisconsin have joined the lawsuit to stop the order.

Over a million people flee to South Sudan as Sudan conflict grinds on: UN

More than one million people have fled the war in Sudan to seek refuge in neighbouring South Sudan, according to the United Nations.

In its latest update on one of the world’s worst displacement crises, the UN issued new data on Tuesday showing that more than 770,000 people have fled through the Joda crossing on South Sudan’s northern border with Sudan in the last 21 months.

Tens of thousands more have crossed the border at other points, bringing the total to have fled to South Sudan since the war between the paramilitary Rapid Support Forces (RSF) and the Sudanese Armed Forces (SAF) erupted in April 2023 to more than a million, according to the statement issued by the UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) and the International Organization for Migration (IOM).

“The arrival of over a million people into South Sudan is a stark and sobering statistic and truly shows the increasing scale of this crisis,” the UNHCR’s Sanaa Abdalla Omer said.

Most crossing the border are South Sudanese nationals who had previously fled from civil war in the world’s newest country, the statement noted.

“The people of South Sudan continue to show extraordinary generosity, welcoming those in need and sharing what little resources they have, but they cannot shoulder this massive responsibility alone,” Omer added.

Two transit centres in Renk County on South Sudan’s northern border, which have been designed for fewer than 5,000 people, are now hosting more than 16,000.

The UN has called for more support for both displaced people and the communities hosting them, warning that resources in South Sudan such as healthcare, water and shelter had become “dangerously overstretched”.

Famine

The war continues to rage as its second anniversary approaches, with the RSF and SAF accusing each other of war crimes, including targeting civilians and indiscriminately shelling residential areas, resulting in the deaths of tens of thousands of people.

At least 20,000 people have been killed and some 25 million – half of the country’s population – are suffering from severe hunger and in urgent need of humanitarian aid.

Last month, the UN-backed global hunger-monitoring group, the Famine Review Committee of the Integrated Food Security Phase Classification (IPC) published a report outlining famine in five areas, including in Sudan’s largest displacement camp, Zamzam, in North Darfur province.

Famine conditions were confirmed in Abu Shouk and al-Salam, two camps for internally displaced people in el-Fasher, the besieged capital of North Darfur in western Sudan, as well as in residential and displaced communities in the Nuba Mountains in southern Sudan, according to the report.

Israel’s top general resigns over Oct 7 failures

NewsFeed

Israel’s army chief Herzi Halevi has resigned over security and intelligence ‘failures’ of the Hamas attack on Israel on October 7 2023, leading to opposition calls for Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to do the same.

Panama and China push back against Trump’s canal threats

Panama and China have pushed back against United States President Donald Trump’s controversial claims regarding the Panama Canal.

The Panama Canal “was not a gift” from the US, Panama’s President Jose Raul Mulino said on Wednesday in response to Trump’s threat to seize control of the strategic waterway. Beijing, meanwhile, rejected the US president’s assertion that it is effectively in control of the canal.

“We reject in its entirety everything that Mr Trump has said,” Mulino said during a panel at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland. “First because it is false and second because the Panama Canal belongs to Panama and will continue to belong to Panama. The Panama Canal was not a concession or a gift from the United States. ”

Trump has previously refused to rule out military action to take control of the canal, which the US opened in 1914 to provide a trade route linking its east and west coasts but handed to Panama in 1999.

During his inauguration on Monday, the US president repeated his complaint that China was effectively “operating” the canal, which was “foolishly given to Panama,” thanks to a growing presence around the waterway,

“We didn’t give it to China, we gave it to Panama. And we’re taking it back,” Trump declared.

‘Never interfered’

Panama City on Tuesday made a formal complaint to the United Nations, referring to an article of the UN Charter precluding any member from “the threat or use of force” against the territorial integrity or political independence of another.

In a letter to UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres, it requested that the UN Security Council – on which the US has a veto – take up the matter.

On Wednesday, a spokesperson for the Ministry of Foreign Affairs in Beijing said, “China does not participate in the management and operation of the canal and has never interfered in the affairs of the canal. ”

Mulino has previously denied that any nation interferes with the Panama Canal, saying that it operates on a principle of neutrality.

However, Panama has announced that it now plans an audit of the canal and the Panama Ports Company, a subsidiary of Hong Kong-based conglomerate CK Hutchison Holdings that operates the ports of Balboa and Cristobal on either end of the canal.