Civilians on the front line in Sudan’s ‘forgotten’ war, UN warns

The United Nations has warned that the vicious civil war in Sudan is raging and getting worse.

In a report released on Friday, the UN’s Human Rights Office (OHCHR) reported that as the war approached its two-year anniversary, civilian deaths and ethnic violence, increased significantly. According to reports, paramilitaries carried out several fatalities in an attack on a mosque in Darfur on the same day.

Recommended Stories

list of 3 itemsend of list

According to the report, more civilian deaths have occurred across Sudan, with 3, 384 of those deaths occurring in the first six months of the year, or 80 percent of the 4, 238 civilian deaths that have occurred throughout the entire year until 2024.

OHCHR chief Volker Turk said in a statement that “Sudan’s conflict is a forgotten one, and I hope that my office’s report brings the attention to this disastrous situation where atrocity crimes, including war crimes, are being committed.

The report noted that “a number of trends continued to permeate the first half of 2025, including a continued pattern of sexual violence, indiscriminate attacks, and the widespread use of retaliatory violence against civilians, particularly on an ethnic basis, against those accused of “collaboration” with opposing parties.

The use of drones is among recent trends, including those involving attacks on civilian targets and those in Sudan’s north and east, which have so far been largely spared by the conflict, it said.

According to Turk, “the growing ethnicization of the conflict, which builds on existing inequalities and discrimination, poses serious risks for country’s long-term stability and social cohesion.”

Without urgent action to protect civilians and without the swift and unrestrained delivery of humanitarian aid, “Many more lives will be lost.”

Sudan has been the site of a brutal conflict between the Sudanese army and the paramilitary Rapid Support Forces (RSF) since April 2023.

Tens of thousands of people have been killed and displaced by the conflict. It is considered to be one of the worst humanitarian crises in the world, with southern Sudan and parts of Darfur frequently experiencing famine.

The army is in effect dividing the country, with the RSF dominating the south and nearly the entire western Darfur region, while the army is in charge of the north, east, and center.

The United States, Saudi Arabia, Egypt, and the United Arab Emirates have so far failed in their efforts to broker a ceasefire between the conflicting parties.

In a social media post, the Sudan Doctors’ Network NGO reported that the RSF had killed 43 civilians in a drone strike on a mosque in the beleaguered city of El-Fasher, the capital of North Darfur.

The attack, which showed the group’s “blatant disregard for humanitarian and religious values and international law,” was described as a “heinous crime” against unarmed civilians by the NGO.

A video was posted by the Resistance Committees in El-Fasher, a group made up of local residents from the community who track abuses, that reportedly showed parts of the mosque being reduced to rubble with several bodies scattered on the site, which is now replete with debris.

The RSF targeted a number of unarmed civilians, including women and older people, in city displacement shelters, according to a report released on Thursday.

Mahmoud Khalil: “My story is one drop in the sea of Palestinian sorrow”

About dissent, the fight for Palestinian rights, and detention, Marc Lamont Hill speaks with Mahmoud Khalil.

Mahmoud Khalil, a graduate of Palestinian Columbia University, fled Syria’s civil war and was detained in the United States for more than 100 days after speaking out against Israel’s genocide in Gaza. He claims that the arrest was made to stifle opposition and intimidate opponents.

What does Khalil’s story reveal about the dangers faced by those who speak out for Palestinian rights in the US and how dissent is suppressed there?

Marc Lamont Hill speaks with Mahmoud Khalil this week on UpFront.

Afghanistan bans female authors from university curricula

The Taliban-led government of Afghanistan intends to outlaw women’s books from academic programs.

On Friday, a member of the committee that reviews textbooks gave an update on the ban to BBC Afghan. An educational decree that also forbids education courses that are “deemed in conflict with Islamic Sharia” also includes the blacklisting.

Recommended Stories

list of 3 itemsend of list

The committee member claimed that “all books written by women are not permitted to be taught.”

He continued, noting that at least 679 titles had been banned for their “anti-Sharia and Taliban policies.”

The subjects covered by the books include texts on human rights, Western political theory, Islamic political movements, and texts on constitutional law.

Later, universities will receive a final list of the books that are prohibited.

The deputy higher education minister of the Taliban, Ziaur Rahman Aryoubi, signed a directive that was seen by BBC Afghan, and Afghan universities received a 50-page list of prohibited books at the end of last month.

Aryoubi advised universities in a letter to the universities that a panel of “religious scholars and experts” had made the recommendations, and that banned books should be replaced with course materials that “do not conflict with Islam.”

The Taliban’s latest string of restrictions was announced with the decree four years after taking office.

The Taliban has retaliated in numerous ways in the field of education, starting with the firing of hundreds of professors because they “opposed” the organization’s ideology, and requiring religious coursework at all universities.

Particularly affected are women. After the sixth grade (12 years old), they are no longer permitted to study.

Additionally, the university has been ordered to halt the instruction of 18 subjects, six of which include gender and development. Another 201 course was being reviewed.

Misogynistic outlook

Former deputy justice minister of justice before the Taliban’s return in August 2021, Zakia Adeli, the author of the banned books Political Terminology and International Relations, told BBC Afghan that she was shocked by the decision.

It was not unreasonable to expect the Taliban to change the curriculum, Adeli said, “Considering what they have done over the past four years.”

It is only natural that when women are denied the opportunity to study because of the Taliban’s misogynistic mindset and policies, their opinions, ideas, and writings are also suppressed.

The ban on such a large number of textbooks, according to sources in the capital’s Kabul, will sever significant resources from universities’ efforts to find and purchase replacement textbooks.

A further 300 written by Iranian authors or distributed by Iranian publishers are the targets, besides the 300 women-authored books.

This was intended to “prevent the infiltration of Iranian content,” according to sources, including a member of the book review committee.

Iran hits out ahead of UN vote on nuclear sanctions

Iran has criticised European nations for threatening to resuscitate international sanctions for monitoring its nuclear program.

Tehran officials alleged “political bias” on Friday and pleaded with the European countries to provide “fair proposals” to resolve the issue. They have already reaffirmed their commitment to reimposing international sanctions by the end of the month.

Recommended Stories

list of 3 itemsend of list

The complaints come inainte of a scheduled UNSC vote on a resolution that would end UN sanctions for good in the coming days.

According to diplomats, the resolution’s nine votes are unlikely to pass, and if it does, the United States, Britain, or France would veto it.

Late in August, the E3 (Great Britain, France, and Germany) began a 30-day process to impose sanctions unless Tehran fulfills their demands.

Iranian officials accuse the trio of violating the 2015 Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT), which enables the application of sanctions through a “snapback mechanism.”

Deputy Foreign Minister Saeed Khatibzadeh claimed that the actions taken by Europeans are “politically biased and politically motivated.” “They are wrong on many levels by trying to use the mechanism that is contained in the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), “.

If Iran restored access to UN nuclear inspectors and started discussions with the US, the Europeans offered to delay the snapback for up to six months.

However, French President Emmanuel Macron stated on Thursday that sanctions are likely to be reinstated, with European officials claiming that Iran has not been actively engaged in negotiations.

Iran’s foreign minister Abbas Araghchi insisted that Iran is still committed to the NPT and that Tehran had presented a “reasonable and actionable plan” in response to Macron’s statement.

Khatibzadeh did not provide specifics, but he did say that “every option is open to the door if diplomacy fails.”

He said that if Europeans pursue this course, they will raise unpredictability as high as they can, and they are also accountable for any potential risks in the future.

Dirty work

Tehran is accused by the E3 of violating the EU, China, China, Russia, and Iran’s Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA).

Iran agreed to end its nuclear program in exchange for sanctions relief under the agreement. After then-US President Donald Trump resigned and rescinded unilateral sanctions in 2018, the agreement broke down.

Israel launched a 12-day war against Iran earlier this summer, with Israeli and US forces striking a number of nuclear facilities, which further raised the tensions.

German Chancellor Friedrich Merz reacted in Tehran by saying: “This is dirty work that Israel is doing for all of us.

Iranian officials have also criticized Iran for accusing Tehran of breaking its nuclear obligations in the wake of the attacks, according to the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA).