Category World News

An intergovernmental organization tasked with monitoring human rights has lodged a complaint against a Colombian man who was killed in a US military attack on a alleged drug smuggler in the Caribbean Sea.

The Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (IACHR) received the complaint a day prior, according to the AFP news agency on Wednesday.

When President Donald Trump bombed a boat on September 15th, it claimed that the US violated Alejandro Carranza’s right to life and the rule of law.

Carranza’s family claims that he was killed by the explosion while aboard that ship.

The complaint claimed that “we know that Pete Hegseth, US Secretary of Defense, was in charge of the bombing of boats like those of Alejandro Carranza Medina and the murder of all those on them.”

Hegseth, according to the report, gave the order to strike “despite the fact that he had no idea who the targets of these bombings and extrajudicial killings were.”

Carranza’s family has said he is a fisherman, but Carranza’s family denies that the US military struck his boat with drugs.

Trump himself “has ratified Secretary Hegseth’s conduct,” according to the complaint.

Carranza’s case has sparked a wave of opposition to the US bombing campaign in his native Colombia.

Since September 2, there have been 21 known military strikes the US has carried out on alleged drug smuggling vessels, totaling over 83 fatalities.

Even Gustavo Petro, the president of Colombia, has cited the case in official statements to denounce the bombings as extrajudicial killings.

On October 18, Petro wrote that “US government officials have murdered and violated our territorial waters.”

“The fisherman, Alejandro Carranza, did not have any ties to drug trafficking; he only went fishing every day.” The Colombian boat’s engine was inoperable, and it was adrift. The US government is still waiting for an explanation.

The Trump administration and Hegseth in particular are under increased scrutiny as a result of the family’s complaint.

According to rights groups, strikes are likely prohibited by both domestic and international law, which largely forbids attacks on civilians.

Self-defence laws do not apply because drug trafficking is not regarded as a form of combat under international law.

Following a so-called double-tap strike during the first known bombing on September 2, US media has reported on a heightened level of scrutiny in recent days. A second missile was dropped on the boat in response to reports that the US military’s initial attack appeared to leave two passengers alive.

According to legal experts, hitting on unarmed adversaries is likely to be a war crime. According to the Pentagon’s own manual, firing “upon the shipwreckd” is also prohibited by the laws of armed conflict.

Trump and Hegseth have since said the follow-up strike was ordered by Navy Vice Admiral Frank “Mitch” Bradley, but they have since distanced themselves from the attack. According to the White House, the order was “given within his authority and the law.”

The administration has also stated that the strikes will continue. It has argued that the attacks are necessary to stop ‘narco-terrorists’ from importing drugs into the US.

The president of Colombia, Petro, has been a vocal critic of the strikes and has pledged to support Carranza’s family’s fight for justice.

Katerine Hernandez, Carranza’s widow, described her husband as a “good man” in an interview with the AFP in October.

She claimed that “he had no ties to drug trafficking, and his only daily pastime was fishing.”

Trump threatens possible land attacks on Venezuela as the US militaries its forces in the Caribbean increase.

Nicolas Maduro, the leader of Venezuela, claims that Trump is trying to change the Caracasi regime under the pretext of drug trafficking.

Russian President Vladimir Putin and senior American officials discussed the country’s desire to join NATO during talks in Moscow, according to the Kremlin.

Yury Ushakov, one of Putin’s top advisers, made the comment on Wednesday following a nearly five-hour meeting between Putin and Washington officials Jared Kushner and Steve Witkoff.

Ushakov told reporters, “The American partners have confirmed that they are ready to take into account our considerations and key proposals.”

Moscow contends that Ukraine should never be allowed to join NATO, despite Kyiv’s claim that it must do so to safeguard itself from upcoming Russian aggression.

Another important area of disagreement is territory, with Ushakov claiming shortly after the Witkoff meeting that there hasn’t been “no compromise” on the areas Russia has captured and intends to keep.

Later, at a meeting in Belgium, the European Allies of Ukraine accused Putin of not wanting to end the world-wide civil war it had started against its neighbor in February 2022.

“Putin has not changed any course,” we see. Estonian Foreign Minister Margus Tsahkna reported that he is advancing more forcefully on the front line. It’s obvious that he doesn’t want any kind of peace, he said.

“Promising outcome”

Russian spokesman Dmitry Peskov said on Wednesday that the Kremlin’s claim that Russia is opposed to the US peace plan is “not accurate.”

He said, “We’re not going to add anything on purpose.” The more productive these negotiations will be, it is understood.

Andrii Sybiha, the country’s foreign minister, confirmed that Witkoff, the US special envoy, spoke to the head of the Ukrainian delegation after he met with Putin in Moscow, in response to the US-Russian negotiations on Tuesday.

According to the American delegation’s representatives, “the discussions in Moscow ended up being successful,” he said, adding that Kyiv representatives would soon be invited back to the US. On Sunday, the two parties held discussions in Florida.

Following a “thorough, productive meeting” with Russia’s leader, Witkoff and Kushner “briefed US President Donald Trump and Ukrainian officials,” according to the White House.

NATO’s Mark Rutte said Putin is “wrong” to think he could “outlast” the alliance during a speech in Brussels on Wednesday.

He added that two-thirds of member states have committed to providing Ukraine with weapons worth $4 billion as part of a new initiative. “We’re not going anywhere,” he said.

Following the meeting of NATO foreign ministers, Hungary, according to Foreign Minister Peter Szijjarto, said it will not send any weapons or money to Ukraine.

The European NATO members have been swept up in a brutal war fanaticism. They become incapable of making rational decisions as a result, according to Szijjarto, adding that Trump’s peace efforts are being undermined by NATO’s main members.

What will Trump do next?

According to Jonah Hull, a reporter from Kyiv, the Putin-Witkoff meeting appeared to have failed in advancing Washington’s efforts to broker peace.

He noted that the search for a peace agreement that is acceptable to both parties has stalled as a result.

What Donald Trump’s next move is really important in Ukraine, according to the president. Will he come back with more threats to stifle Ukraine’s ability to accept a bad deal? Or does he abandon interest and leave, which is possibly worse?

In addition, the EU and the EU have agreed to stop producing Russian gas until the end of 2027. We show our support for Ukraine by reducing Putin’s arsenal, according to Commission President Ursula von der Leyen.

In addition to purchasing and producing weapons, Ukraine’s parliament approved a budget for 2026 that will allocate more than one-quarter of GDP to the army.

President Volodymyr Zelenskyy praised the situation in Ukraine as an indication of its resilience and the availability of stable financial resources for the needs of the coming year.

The main concerns are with ensuring our defense, social programs, and the ability to rebuild our lives in the wake of Russian attacks.

The western side of the Caribbean island, which includes the capital Havana, was temporarily affected by a second blackout that had temporarily affected Cuba’s ability to access power.

The blackout began at 5am local time (10:00 GMT), according to the nation’s Ministry of Energy and Mines on Wednesday. At around 1:26 p.m. (18:26 GMT), it declared that all systems had been restored.

Millions of people remained in the dark for hours as the government worked to restore power to a region that stretched from the province of Pinar del Rio’s western border to Mayabeque, which is located just east of Havana.

The public was reassured throughout the morning that the electricity would soon be restored.

The Ministry of Energy and Mines employees immediately began restoration efforts, which are already underway, according to Prime Minister Manuel Marrero Cruz, who posted a statement on social media.

“We are aware of their extraordinary efforts to make this happen as quickly as possible.”

However, power outages have been a frequent source of consternation and a sign of Cuba’s crumbling electrical system.

At least five major power grid failures shook island life in 2024, causing a rare wave of protests against the government in cities like Santiago de Cuba.

A major blackout in September, which was caused by a malfunctioning thermoelectric plant, has continued into 2025.

Grid has numerous pressures.

The National Electric System (SEN) in Cuba is aging. The power grid is viewed as outdated in large part, with a significant use of fossil fuels from sources like Venezuela.

The infrastructure is mostly constructed during the Cold War. Construction increased there in the 1980s, and by 1989, the grid had reached 95% of all households.

In addition to its current energy production system, Cuba has recently invested in renewable energy.

For instance, the Caribbean island signed a deal with China to start 92 solar farms by 2028 in April 2024. The first of those solar installations was inaugurated in February of this year.

However, hurricanes and other natural disasters continue to impede the island’s electricity supply.

For instance, Hurricane Imelda sprang through the Caribbean Sea in late September, causing at least two fatalities in Cuba.

Then, in October, Hurricane Melissa, one of the most powerful Atlantic storms ever, struck Cuba once more.

By the time it made landfall in Cuba, the hurricane had slowed to a Category 3 storm, but it still blasted the island with more flash floods, causing thousands of homes to be lost and thousands of people to be displaced.

Additionally, Cuban officials have accused the United States of aiding the island’s deteriorating infrastructure.

Cuba has been subject to a broad-reaching embargo by the US since 1962, which critics claim has harmed the island’s economy.

According to reports of human rights violations under the Cuban government, the administration of US President Donald Trump has continued to impose the sanctions despite efforts to loosen them in recent years.

However, as part of an annual appeal, a majority vote at the UN General Assembly once more authorized the US to ratify a non-binding resolution in October.

According to the resolution, the economic sanctions are disproportionately punitive.

President blames US “blockade”

On Wednesday, Cuban President Miguel Diaz-Canel cited that justification as obstacles to the proper operation of the electrical grid, along with the recent storms.

The Ministry of Energy and Mines employees, who never rest despite the daily strains brought on by the blockade and the recovery efforts following Hurricane Melissa, are already working to address the problem, Diaz-Canel wrote. We have faith in them once more.

Diaz-Canel has been subject to significant pressure from blackouts and public unrest since taking office in 2019.

In protest of the island’s worsening economic conditions and the COVID-19 pandemic, thousands of Cubans took to the streets in 2021 to protest the island’s deteriorating circumstances. The island’s frequent blackouts were one of the complaints that they made.

A record-setting mass exodus from Cuba followed those protests. Although estimates vary for the island’s population, government statistics show that there were roughly 11, 113, and 215 residents overall in 2021.

As of 2024, that number has plummeted to 9, 748, 532. That suggests a significant population decline of more than 12%, most of it due to island migration.

The US Customs and Border Protection agency has documented a rise in Cuban arrivals, which corresponds to that increase.

The organization reported 200, 287 “encounters” with Cuban migrants trying to enter the United States for fiscal year 2023. For fiscal year 2024, that number rose to 217, 615.

The Sanoubar family claims that Israeli soldiers only gave them two minutes to leave their homes in Nablus, West Bank, during the occupation. The extended family’s apartment building was then destroyed.

As huge clouds of dust and smoke erupted from the building’s floors on Tuesday, the area was shaken by the explosion in Nablus.

Abdul Karim Sanoubar, a 30-year-old bombing suspect currently being held in Israel, had access to his extended family at the home. More than 30 people were incarcerated in the apartment complex as a result of Sanoubar’s alleged actions.

They “took this to frighten us,” they claimed.

Sanoubar, a well-known prisoner detained in July of this year, is infamous among Israeli authorities for avoiding capture for five months after being charged with conspiring to carry out bus bombings in Bat Yam, Tel Aviv, in February.

Because the explosives went off while the buses were parked, neither person was hurt nor killed in the incident.

After two days of manhunts in Nablus, when Israeli forces stormed homes and residential areas close to Sanoubar’s family home, they were eventually apprehended.

Sanoubar’s uncle, Moayed, referred to Israel’s destruction of a building as an “act of terrorism” against his family when the people inside alleged no crimes.

He told Al Jazeera, “We’re not the terrorists, they’re”. This is “absolutely unjust.”

Amer, 61, Sanoubar’s father, claimed that the destruction of his home was the most recent instance of “collective punishment” for his family due to his son’s alleged crimes.

He claimed that they did this to frighten us. They want to ensure that no young Palestinian will ever consider carrying a single bullet.

He made a huge gesture, his lifelong home now strewn in a gaping hole looking out over West Nablus, surrounded by the dusty ruins of his.

It is intended as a deterrent to Palestinians as a whole.

The family informed Al Jazeera that the Israeli army had learned that their now-demolished home had also been seize, making it impossible for them to go back to it or repair the skeleton that is still standing.

The home had been destroyed as part of the Israeli army’s “Operation Five Stones,” which it launched in late November as a “counterterrorism operation,” the army claimed.

Collective punishment

Human rights organizations have criticized Israel’s punitive destruction of homes in the occupied West Bank as a form of collective punishment and as against international law.

Since their younger brother was detained, Ahmad and Omar, respectively, Sanoubar’s brothers, have also been imprisoned.

In accordance with Israel’s administrative detention system, which allows for an indefinite sentence without a trial, all three siblings are being detained.

Since Sanoubar was accused of the bombing, Amer, the father, has been detained three times, along with Sanoubar’s sister and mother.

Furniture and other items that Israeli soldiers have taken over the family’s apartments have been destroyed.

Amer claimed that the harsh measures were intended to coerce his son into giving himself while he was on the run.

In April, the family was given a demolition order, but the Israeli courts rejected the family’s objection. The family was given just 72 hours to file an objection.

The family claims that since then, the house has been glued to a tent and has been awaiting the sounds of military vehicles.

The destruction wrought by the explosion inside our apartment complex is unfathomable, Mer continued.

The family of Sanoubar’s displaced family is now residing with various family members in Nablus and the surrounding area.

Other nearby families who had to be evacuated for the demolition have returned to their homes, many of which had broken windows or other external damage to repair.

The walls of Sanoubar’s top-floor bedroom had the words “We fight so we can live” emblazoned on the wall and visible from the roof.