Democratic states that are currently contesting a government order to turn over information about recipients of food assistance have threatened to do so under the direction of United States Secretary of Agriculture Brooke Rollins.
Rollins spoke about the ongoing lawsuit, which pits US President Donald Trump’s administration against 21 states and the District of Columbia, on Tuesday at his final cabinet meeting of the year.
Recommended Stories
list of 3 itemsend of list
The US Department of Agriculture (USDA) has resisted that states provide details about who receives funding from the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) under Trump.
SNAP, a term used to describe food stamps, aids low-income households in purchasing groceries. By the year 2024, nearly 41.7 million people in the US were relying on the program, or nearly 12% of the population.
According to the USDA’s order, states would be required to provide federal authorities with information such as birth dates, birth dates, and home addresses. Critics worry that transferring this kind of data could infringe on privacy.
However, Rollins stated to the cabinet that the information was necessary to “protect the American taxpayer” and to address alleged fraud.
We requested that all states provide their data to the federal government for the first time in order to ensure that those who actually need food stamps are receiving them.
She claimed that partisan politics might be at play in the opposition to her demand.
“Yes, 69 states responded. The red states, it seems, are unexpected. All of that information about fraud comes from there, Rollins continued. “But 21 states, including the blue states of California, New York, and Minnesota, continue to refuse.”
In consequence, Rollins claims that those states with Democratic ties would no longer receive federal aid for their SNAP recipients.
So, she said, “we have started and will begin stopping moving federal funds into those states until they comply” as of the following week.
A persistent legal issue
Rollins’ ability to carry out her threat is unsure.
A temporary restraining order was issued in a US district court in northern California in September to stop the government from implementing its data request. A temporary injunction was granted once more in October after a second hearing on the matter was held.
After the Supreme Court’s decision in October, California’s attorney general, Rob Bonta, a Democrat, stated in a statement that “the President is trying to hijack a nutrition program to fuel his mass surveillance agenda.
“We won’t allow that to occur,” he said. “Neither on our watch nor within our communities.”
Some of the most senior Democrats’ outraged after the lawsuit’s states announced on Tuesday that federal SNAP funds would be suspended.
“Genuine question: Why is the Trump administration so hostile toward people who are hungry?” Rollins’ remarks were shared by New York Governor Kathy Hochul in a social media post.
The Trump administration’s plan is also being denounced by the House Agriculture Committee, which also issued a statement.
Trump and Rollins have once more allegedly threatened to withhold federal funds. Trump continues to use the term “hunger,” but SNAP has one of the lowest fraud rates of any government program.
Rollins responded on social media, claiming that the states were trying to “protect their bribery schemes,” a claim that was made without any supporting evidence.
It’s that easy, she wrote, “No DATA, NO MONEY.” A state won’t receive any money from the federal SNAP administrative budget if it doesn’t share information about criminal use of SNAP benefits.
Using SNAP as a tool?
In a report released last year, the Government Accountability Office (GAO) revealed that 11.7% of SNAP benefits were “improper” in the fiscal year 2023. This included incorrect payments of about $10.5 billion.
However, according to the report, some of those “improper” disbursements were overreported and underreported to legitimate recipients.
Additionally, the Trump administration has attempted to suspend SNAP funds previously with Tuesday’s threat.
The USDA announced that it would not be paying SNAP benefits for the month of November during the government shutdown, which lasted for an unprecedented 43 days.
Numerous states sued, accusing the Trump administration of using food aid to compel Democratic lawmakers to approve the budget.
The states were given the order to resume funding by two federal courts. The Supreme Court subsequently halted the lower courts’ decisions after the Trump administration filed an appeal.





