Slider1
Slider2
Slider3
Slider4
previous arrow
next arrow

Musk vows to ‘fix’ X after polls show high support for Ukraine’s Zelenskyy

In response to opinion polls that disprove US President Donald Trump’s claim that Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy is incredibly unpopular in his country, Elon Musk has pledged to “fix” X’s fact-checking tool.

Rowing in behind Trump’s attacks on Zelenskyy on Thursday, Musk claimed that his social media platform’s “community notes” feature was being “gamed” by governments and traditional media.

Musk made the claim while reposting an unidentified right-wing X account that cast doubt on the legitimacy of a Ukrainian polling organization’s relationship to the US Agency for International Development (USAID).

“If Zelensky was actually loved by the people of Ukraine, he would hold an election. He canceled the election because he knows he would lose in a landslide despite having control of ALL Ukrainian media, Musk said on X, while refuting the unsupported claim that US intelligence agencies only estimate Zelenskyy’s approval rate is 4 percent.

“In reality, he is despised by the people of Ukraine, which is why he has refused to hold an election”, Musk said, referring to Zelenskyy’s decision to suspend elections after declaring martial law in the wake of Moscow’s 2022 invasion.

Zelensky’s campaign is being challenged to hold an election and refute that. He will not”.

The CEO of Tesla and SpaceX, who is one of Trump’s most powerful allies and heads the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), did not provide any evidence of X’s community notes system’s manipulation, which assigns explanations to posts that are contentious based on user consensus.

Musk also did not back up a claim that widely reported polling by the Kyiv International Institute of Sociology was “Zelensky-controlled” and “not credible,” as he later claimed at the Conservative Political Action Conference waving a chainsaw in homage to Argentina’s cutting-edge president Javier Milei later on Thursday.

Lucas Graves, a journalism professor at the University of Wisconsin-Madison who researches misinformation and disinformation, described Musk’s comments as “extremely concerning”.

According to Graves, “the accusations are a guideline for what we have to watch out for from the accuser – a world where private platforms like X can be systematically manipulated to favor the political interests and alliances of their owners,” as is frequently the case with this kind of rhetoric.

“A well-designed community notes system can be a useful check on misinformation. However, that requires transparent regulations that permit users to quickly access reliable information and that are unrestricted to individual preferences.

An inescapable feature of crowdsourced fact-checking models, according to John Wihbey, an associate professor of media innovation and technology at Northeastern University in Canada, is that the platform’s owner or management might not like the outcomes.

“That is part of the bargain you make when you implement&nbsp, these kinds of mechanisms”, Wihbey told Al Jazeera.

“Overall, I think community notes is a good approach, but it should be blended with other tools. Ironic that leadership is now blaming the fact that it isn’t working well because X is now relying on it too much.

The Ukrainian leader and the Trump administration have been at odds with one another over Washington’s efforts to end the conflict in Ukraine with a deal with Russia, with Musk’s broadside against Zelenskyy coming as they have been speaking out in broad strokes.

After the Ukrainian leader refuted his claims that Kyiv was to blame for the war and expressed concerns about being cut off from Washington’s negotiations with Moscow, Trump accused Zelenskyy of being a “dictator.”

Zelenskyy was also alleged to be “very low” in the polls in his country, refuting a previous claim that he only had a 4 percent approval rating.

57% of respondents to a poll by the Kyiv International Institute of Sociology on Wednesday said they believed Zelenskyy, up 5 points from December.

The Ukrainian leader’s popularity, however, has waned as the war has gone on, dropping from 90 percent in March 2022 to 64 percent in February last year, according to the institute’s polling.

Since taking control of X, formerly known as Twitter, in 2022, Musk has been heavily criticised for allowing, and in some cases promoting, misinformation on the platform.

Nearly three-quarters of a sample of false or misleading posts about the US elections of 2024 did not show accurate notes correcting the record, according to an analysis conducted by the nonprofit Center for Countering Digital Hate.

“I think there’s a strong chance that X/Twitter becomes a propaganda arm for Musk/Trump – and, in fact, it’s already happening”, Gordon Pennycook, a professor of psychology at Cornell University who studies misinformation, told Al Jazeera.

Netanyahu takes aim at West Bank after bus explosions near Tel Aviv

After three empty buses detonated on top of a central Israel parking lot, Israel is gearing up for an “intensive” operation in the occupied West Bank.

Israeli security services say the bombings on Thursday evening, which caused no casualties, were the work of armed groups, according to Israeli media.

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has just finished a security assessment, according to the Israeli prime minister’s office, which was posted on social media.

The military has been given the directive to launch an extensive operation against the occupied West Bank and the centers of terrorism in Judea and Samaria. Netanyahu’s office stated that the Prime Minister also directed the ISA and Israel Police to increase preventative action to stop additional attacks in Israeli cities.

The movement of Palestinians was immediately slowed down in some parts of the West Bank, and further restrictions have been placed on those areas. Citing unnamed security officials, The Jerusalem Post reported that the explosives had been linked to “terrorist infrastructure” in the West Bank.

Authorities in Bat Yam, central Israel, on Thursday night, witness one of a string of bus explosions that appeared to be a deliberate attack [Ohad Zwigenberg/AP Photo]

In order to advance its weeks-long offensive against Palestinian communities, the Israeli military later announced that it had added three additional units to its “Central Command,” which is in charge of Israeli forces in the occupied West Bank.

“The]Israeli military] continues to conduct an ongoing situation assessment and prepares to expand offensive activity”, the military said.

Three empty buses parked in depots close to Bat Yam, a city south of Tel Aviv, were destroyed by the bombs, and police discovered two more undetonated bombs in the area.

Israel’s Shin Bet internal security agency has received the results of the investigation.

No further information was provided about the explosives’ potential explosion on Friday morning when people were heading to work, according to police.

According to police spokesman Haim Sargrof, “we need to know whether one suspect placed explosives on a number of buses, or whether there were multiple suspects.”

Nour Odeh, a correspondent for Al Jazeera, reported that the “intense Israeli military action” following the explosions has increased the plight of Palestinians in the West Bank.

More than 40, 000 people have been forced to flee the occupied West Bank as a result of an unprecedented military assault, according to Odeh.

Since the Israeli military launched their offensive on January 21, hundreds of checkpoints have been set up across the occupied West Bank, killing at least 70 Palestinians there.

Israeli troops have also extensively destroyed civilian infrastructure in nearby towns.

US Senate confirms Kash Patel for a 10-year term to lead the FBI

Former federal prosecutor Kash Patel will become the next director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), continuing a trend of success for President Donald Trump’s cabinet nominees.

But Thursday’s confirmation came by slim margins. Only 51 senators, all Republican, voted in favour of Patel in the 100-seat Senate.

Susan Collins of Maine and Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, both of whom were notable Republican Party defections. What critics have called the FBI’s nomination a dangerous nomination, they joined 47 Democrats in opposing it.

“  Mr Patel’s record demonstrates that he’s dangerous, inexperienced and dishonest”, Democratic Senator Dirk Durbin of Illinois said. He should not and cannot not be an effective FBI director.

For his part, in a social media post, Patel thanked Trump and said he was honoured to be confirmed.

The politicalization of our system of justice has eroded public trust, Patel wrote. “Let good cops be cops, rebuild trust in the FBI,” my director’s statement reads like a proverb.

But in the lead-up to the vote, a parade of Democratic lawmakers, including Durbin, took the Senate floor to warn against confirming Patel, saying he would indeed politicise the FBI.

Given previous assertions that suggested he might use the bureau’s resources to pursue Trump’s political rivals and journalists, they raised doubts about his ability to lead the FBI fairly.

Despite the enormous threat he poses to our national security, Durbin said, “It is shocking that my Republican colleagues are willing to support him.”

“I’m sorry to say, but I think they’ll quickly regret this choice,” he said. I can’t think of a better option than to give this man a 10-year lead in the world’s most renowned criminal investigative agency.

On February 20, Senator Lisa Murkowski attends the final casting vote for Kash Patel.

A narrow confirmation

The historically tight margins that Patel’s confirmation passed revealed those concerns. His FBI predecessors received overwhelmingly bipartisan support.

With 92 votes, Christopher Wray, an ex-director of the FBI, was confirmed in 2017. Before him, in 2013, James Comey notched 93 votes in support. And for Robert Mueller in 2001, the vote was unanimous, 98 to zero.

None of President Trump’s nominees are likely to fall short in a confirmation vote because of the Senate’s solid 53-member Republican majority.

Even Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, who has rebuffed his fellow Republicans’ support for Tulsi Gabbard and Robert F. Kennedy Jr., backed Patel on Thursday.

Collins and Murkowski explained in separate statements that they could not support Patel because they worried that he might use the FBI for political gain.

According to Murkowski, “Mr. Patel’s reservations stem from his own prior political activities and how they might affect his leadership.” The FBI must be relied upon as a federal agency that eradicates crime and corruption, not one focused on settling political disputes.

Collins echoed that sentiment, saying Patel’s “aggressive political activity” cast doubt on his ability to lead a nonpartisan bureau.

According to Collins, “Mr. Patel’s recent political profile undermines his ability to serve in the apolitical role of FBI director.”

Under Trump’s leadership, Patel has not been the first to cause division among Republicans.

During Trump’s first term, from 2017 to 2021, Patel served in a variety of roles, including in the National Security Council and the Office of the Director of National Intelligence.

However, it was reported in news that Gina Haspel, the director of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), threatened to step down due to the possibility that Trump would nominate Patel as her replacement.

Bill Barr, who was the attorney general in Trump’s first term, also recalled shooting down a proposal to make Patel the FBI deputy director, calling it “over my dead body.”

A protester holds up a sign that reads,
Stephen Butterfield of Washington, DC, holds a sign outside the FBI headquarters protesting Kash Patel on February 3]Kevin Lamarque/Reuters]

Facing Senate criticism

Patel defended himself from allegations that he would use the FBI to sway Trump’s approval during his confirmation hearings in January. If confirmed as FBI director, he also denied that he would engage in illegal behavior.

“I have no interest, no desire and will not, if confirmed, go backwards. As he was subjected to heated interrogation, Patel declared to Democratic senators that the FBI would not be politicized.

Patel also laid out his plans to spread more resources, including through the distribution of more resources among the 50 states, for the FBI’s law enforcement.

“A third of the workforce for the FBI works in Washington, DC”, Patel replied. “I am fully committed to having that workforce go out into the interior of the country where I live, west of the Mississippi, and work with sheriff’s departments and local officers”.

Patel, the son of Indian immigrants who immigrated from Uganda to Canada and later to the US, described the accusations against him as “false accusations and grotesque mischaracterizations.”

However, he has repeatedly been confronted by his own words, as evidenced by his numerous appearances on podcasts and books.

Patel, for instance, has spread the conspiracy theory that the FBI planned the attack on the US Capitol on January 6, 2021, as a “false flag” operation to corner Trump supporters.

In a September interview on The Shawn Ryan Show, Patel also threatened to “shut down” the FBI headquarters in Washington, DC, and turn it into a “museum for the deep state”.

And speaking to Trump ally Steve Bannon in 2023, Patel pledged to go after the president’s political rivals, which he described as “criminals” and “conspirators”. He also repeated false claims that Trump’s election defeat in 2020 against Joe Biden was fraudulent.

“We will go out and find the conspirators, not just in government but in the media”, Patel said. We’re going to go after the media figures who fabricated information about Americans who aided Joe Biden in the presidential election rig.

Patel has even penned a children’s book, The Plot Against the King, that depicted Trump as a monarch besieged by antagonists styled after Hillary Clinton and Kamala Harris, his Democratic rivals in the 2016 and 2024 presidential races, respectively.

Democrats have also criticized him for his involvement with the “J6 choir,” which is made up of federal agents detained following the Capitol bombing of 2021.

Thom Tillis shakes hands with Kash Patel
After a confirmation hearing on January 30 [Evelyn Hockstein/Reuters], Senator Thom Tillis and Kash Patel shake hands.

Democrats urge a ‘ no ‘ vote

Democratic Senator Alex Padilla of California characterized Patel as using Trump as his “cash cow” as a tool to negotiate publishing deals and media appearances minutes before the Senate voted to confirm him.

Padilla also questioned Patel’s suitability for the position of FBI director, based on whether he had any prior experience with law enforcement or intelligence.

“Kash Patel has demonstrated a dangerous lack of judgement, lack of preparation and lack of independence”, Padilla said. Should he be chosen as the FBI’s leader, “he has demonstrated that he is either unwilling or unable to put politics aside to protect the American people and uphold the Constitution.”

Senator Adam Schiff, another California Democrat, echoed his colleague. He expressed concern that the FBI would be gutted under Patel’s leadership, as part of Trump’s slashes to the federal workforce.

“  In a democracy, law enforcement does not serve the president, let alone someone who fashions himself as a king. Law enforcement serves the people”, Schiff said.

US official demands Zelenskyy return to talks over critical minerals deal

In response to a growing rift between Washington and Kyiv, US President Donald Trump’s national security adviser has demanded that Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy resume talks over a crucial mineral deal.

Zelenskyy had on Wednesday rejected US plans to recoup US military assistance by striking a deal with Ukraine’s mineral wealth, claiming the US had not included any specific security guarantees in the deal.

At a press conference on Thursday, Mike Waltz remarked, “He needs to come back to the table.”

“President Trump is obviously very frustrated right now with President Zelensky, the fact that he hasn’t come to the table, that he hasn’t been willing to take this opportunity that we have offered”, he said.

The comments were made shortly after Zelenskyy and a US envoy in Kyiv were scheduled to miss a press conference.

The Ukrainian leader had planned to address the media alongside Lieutenant General Keith Kellogg, the US envoy for&nbsp, Ukraine, following talks in Kyiv on Thursday.

The meeting’s format allows for protocol filming without any statements or questions, according to Ukrainian presidential spokesman Serhii Nikiforov’s press release.

Zelenskyy said in a statement that he had a ‘ good and detailed ‘ conversation with Kellogg]Thomas Peter/Reuters]

As the two men shook hands and sat across a table from each other, photographers and video journalists were permitted into the room.

No one on either side’s immediate response to the conversation’s conclusion.

Zelenskyy later claimed in a statement that he had a “good and detailed” discussion with Kellogg about potential agreements with the US on issues like security and investment.

Zelenskyy wrote on social media that “we must and can ensure that peace is strong and lasting” to prevent Russia from starting a war with a conflict.

With the US president, Ukraine is prepared for a robust, fruitful investment and security agreement. The most efficient and effective method has been suggested. Our workforce is always available.

The discussions come after US President Donald Trump called Zelenskyy a “dictator” in a string of disparaging remarks and suggested that Ukraine was to blame for the conflict that broke out when Russia launched a full-scale invasion in February 2022. In response, Zelenskyy said that Trump was living in a “disinformation space”.

“Some of the rhetoric coming out of Kyiv, frankly, and insults to President Trump were unacceptable”, Waltz said on Thursday, in an apparent reference to those comments.

Trump’s remarks about the conflict sparked outrage in Europe, where leaders claimed they had misinterpreted the outcome and cast doubt on the US’s credibility as a trusted security partner. Trump has stated before that the US contributes too much to European security and that the rest should be split between the US and Europe.

This week, the US president sends several officials to meet with Russian officials in Saudi Arabia, upending years of US foreign policy.

US Vice President JD Vance defended Trump’s approach in a TV interview on Thursday, calling him “an effective negotiator” who “doesn’t take anything off the table”.

Can the relationship between the US and Ukraine be saved?

Volodymyr Zelenskyy is the subject of Donald Trump’s tirade.

The new US administration’s dramatic change in policy toward Ukraine has been revealed.

Donald Trump, the president of the US, accused his Ukrainian counterpart of defrauding the country by spending billions on a war that was ultimately in vain.

Despite Russia’s invasion, he also attributed Volodymyr Zelenskyy’s starting the war to him.

So is all this about what’s best for Ukraine?

Or is it more of a personal vendetta, dating back to Trump’s first term in office?

Presenter: James Bays

Guests:

At Rochester Institute of Technology, David Cay Johnston is Professor of Law, Journalism, and Public Policy.

Inna Borzylo – Co-founder and researcher at a German-Ukrainian think tank