Who is Curtis Sliwa, the Republican in New York City’s 2025 mayoral race?

Democrats are overwhelmingly in the mayoral election in New York City, a sign of the city’s deeply liberal bent. However, a Republican could change the outcome of the election.

Prior to the November 4 election, candidate Curtis Sliwa has refrained from appealing to some top conservatives, which should increase the chances for former governor Andrew Cuomo, who is running as an independent after being defeated in the Democratic primary in June.

Recommended Stories

list of 3 itemsend of list

Some political observers believe that Zohran Mamdani’s departure will give Cuomo the best chance to defeat him in the Democratic Socialist party’s frontrunner race.

According to Rusat Ramgopal, Sliwa’s deputy campaign manager, “New Yorkers are tired of Andrew Cuomo, but Andrew Cuomo doesn’t seem to understand when “no” means “no,” making a sharp reference to the sexual misconduct allegations that forced Cuomo to step down as governor of New York State in 2021.

[Joseph Stepansky/Al Jazeera] Curtis Sliwa supporters gather in midtown Manhattan to watch the first mayoral debate on October 17.

Sliwa has also struck both of his rivals.

During the final mayoral debate on October 22, he said, “Zohran, your resume could fit on a cocktail napkin, and Andrew, your failures could fill a public school library in New York City.”

Sliwa falsely claimed during the final debate that the leading candidate supports “global jihad,” using the same Islamophobic tropes that Mamdani’s critics have perpetuated.

Local performer or subway hero?

Curtis Sliwa, then, who is he? Sliwa has been plagued by this question ever since he became well-known as the leader of the Guardian Angels, a volunteer crime-fighting organization known for its patrols of the New York City subway system.

Supporters have endorsed the group’s do-it-yourself ethos, which Sliwa started in 1979 as a 24-year-old night manager at a McDonald’s in the Bronx. He is still regarded as the epitome of New Yorkers taking action when the city’s administration fails, insisted by many.

People “think about public safety and subway safety when they see that red beret.” They are aware of his contributions to the city, Ramgopal said.

He is a larger-than-life figure who has, to this point, contributed greatly to New York life.

Guardian Angels
[David Boe/The Associated Press] A Guardian Angels member can be seen on a Brooklyn subway in 2021.

Others have accused the Guardian Angels of fortifying a dangerous style of vigilantism, saying they don’t carry weapons. Additionally, the organization has been criticized for allegedly demonizing immigrants, falsely accusing people of crimes, and racial profiling.

Sliwa has frequently condemned “migrant” crime on the campaign trail.

Sliwa admitted in 1992 that he had fabricated some crimes to gain publicity, but the authenticity of the group’s exploits has been scrutinized.

Sliwa has previously served as a radio host, media personality, and candidate for local politics.

What platforms does he use?

Unsurprisingly, Sliwa’s campaign focuses on public safety, particularly in the transit system. Sliwa argued that the city is “facing a crisis of crime, lawlessness, and failed leadership” despite the drop in crime.

According to his website, he has pledged to “enhance proactive and intrusive policing strategies to target illegal firearm carriers, repeat offenders, and violent criminals before crimes occur,” along with 7, 000 new New York Police Department (NYPD) officers, re-up controversial police units, and re-up controversial ones.

Critics claim that these tactics have historically resulted in more racial profiling, over-policing of minority communities, and civil liberties violations.

He has also pushed for affordability, a problem that has been a hot topic this election cycle, and pledged to reform the city’s current system to better coordinate with programs for affordable housing.

Sliwa, who owns several cats, has also made animal protection a crucial component of his campaign.

What qualities does he possess that his supporters admire?

Sliwa, who is the only right-wing candidate in the race, enjoys strong support from registered Republicans, who make up 11% of New York’s 4 7 million electors.

He continues to woo new supporters despite having gained popularity decades ago.

Shan Singh, a 30-year-old cab driver from Richmond Hill, Queens, told Al Jazeera, “His work with the Guardian Angels has resonated a lot with me.”

In the presidential election of 2024, Singh, who had previously supported Democrats, switched to Republican Party and US President Donald Trump. He thinks that the recent protests in the city are risky.

FILE PHOTO: Democratic candidate Zohran Mamdani speaks during a mayoral debate with Republican candidate Curtis Sliwa and independent candidate former New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo, in New York, U.S., October 16, 2025. Angelina Katsanis/Pool via REUTERS/File Photo
Republican presidential candidate Curtis Sliwa and independent candidate Andrew Cuomo speak during a debate between Democratic candidate Zohran Mamdani and former New York governor Andrew Cuomo.

He added that Sliwa’s polls-related defeat does not make him lose his vote.

Despite the statistics, Curtis “smears to me as the person who seems most real,” he said.

Before the first mayoral debate in midtown Manhattan, Brooklyn resident Russell, 28, made a request that his last name be kept private.

He claimed that both Cuomo and Mamdani were too anti-crime, and that their support for bail reform initiatives, which aim to end low-level criminal justice cases and prevent widespread incarceration, was unfair.

Because there are no repercussions for it, Russell said, “it encourages criminals to keep committing crimes.”

Has he a chance of winning?

Sliwa lacks a genuine path to victory, lacking a miracle. He received 14% of likely voters, according to the most recent Quinnipiac University poll. That outperformed the 43 percent and 33 percent support provided by Mamdani and Cuomo.

Cuomo has worked so hard to get out of the race because of this. A vote for Sliwa is essentially a vote for Mamdani, according to the former governor, who has made numerous phone calls to conservative voters.

If Sliwa were to leave, Cuomo even left the door open for him to take over the presidency.

The appeals have so far been unsuccessful. How many of Sliwa’s steadfast supporters would be willing to cross party lines, also, is a mystery.

Threatened with ICE raids, US groups consider cancelling Dia de los Muertos

The number of people being held by ICE has increased by about 59 percent over the past year, from 37, 395 in September 2024 to 59, 762 last month.

Deportations have increased as well, with 527, 000 removals reported since Trump’s second term.

In a statement released in October, White House spokesman Tricia McLaughlin declared that “the Trump Administration is on pace to break records.”

Trump has threatened to deploy federal troops in California as part of his effort to carry out his deportation drive and crackdown on crime.

In response to protests against his immigration policies, he has already sent 4, 000 National Guard members and 700 Marines to Los Angeles in June.

He announced earlier this month that he planned to send military forces to San Francisco, but he ultimately decided to stop the “surge.”

The Museum of Contemporary Art Santa Barbara is one of the institutions that suspended the traditional procession known as the Calenda Da de los Muertos this year, which is located about six hours south of San Francisco.

The event has previously featured an altar for the dead and Oaxacan cuisine as well as music and dances from the Mexican states of Oaxaca and Guerrero.

Giuffre family notes Andrew’s UK royal expulsion, calls for US questioning

Australia’s Hazlewood humbles India in second T20 ahead of World Cup

Australia won the second T20I against India at Melbourne Cricket Ground with a dominant four-wicket performance thanks to a masterclass with the ball from Josh Hazlewood and a batsmanship blitz from Mitchell Marsh.

In a 82,438 capacity crowd, fast bowler Hazlewood defeated India for 125 in a devastating opening game at the sporting colosseum on Friday, taking 3-13 and collecting 15 dot balls.

Recommended Stories

list of 4 itemsend of list

With 40 balls to go, the hosts reeled in the modest total before Captain Marsh and Travis Head shared a 51-run opening partnership with Travis Head.

Australia will lead the five-match series 1-0 heading into its third game on Sunday in Hobart after the rainy Canberra opener washed out on Wednesday.

Abhishek Sharma, the opener for India, won with 68 off 37 balls, amplifying his burgeoning reputation with a strong first fifty on Australian soil.

However, he was one of only two Indian batters to score twice on a fast-paced, fast-paced pitch.

On the first ball, Shubman Gill gave out lbw after Marsh won the toss and chose to field.

Hazlewood followed up with a short ball that crashed into Gill’s helmet, which was overturned after being reviewed.

A shake-up Gill slogged Hazlewood, leading to a five-year high order collapse, after which a top-order collapsed.

Suryakumar Yadav was the skipper’s fourth single-digit score in six games before dismissing Tilak Varma for a duck with a top-edge caught by wicketkeeper Inglis.

India was in serious trouble at 32 for four by the time Hazlewood’s four-over spell came to an end.

In whatever format I’m playing, the ball seems to be coming out really well, according to man-of-the-match Hazlewood.

“It was just put the ball in the right places; don’t try too hard; just watch what happens.”

In the first over he faced, Sharma had a strong start as he smashed 14 runs off paceman Xavier Bartlett (2-39).

In a 56-run stand for the sixth wicket, he and Harshit Rana (35) saved India from embarrassment.

However, Bartlett quickly resurrected from his bruising early spell, dismissing Rana and Shivam Dube, who had brilliantly been brilliantly pouched by a diving Inglis.

UN human rights chief says US strikes on alleged drug boats ‘unacceptable’

The United Nations’ human rights chief has demanded an investigation into US military operations against ships allegedly carrying illegal drugs from South America in the Caribbean Sea and eastern Pacific Ocean, calling on the attacks to end.

Volker Turk, the UN’s head of human rights, issued a statement on Friday that the UNHCR had the first official condemnation of US strikes.

Recommended Stories

list of 3 itemsend of list

“These attacks are unacceptable, and their continuing human suffering,” Turk said. Whatever the criminal conduct alleged against them, the US must put an end to these attacks and take all necessary steps to stop the extrajudicial killing of those aboard these ships.

At a regular UN briefing, Turk’s representative Ravina Shamdasani expressed concern that Washington’s actions were in violation of international human rights law and called for prompt, independent, and transparent inquiries.

The attacks on the boats are a necessary step in the fight against drug cartels, which has caused divisions in the region. US President Donald Trump has argued this is a necessary step.

His increasingly violent rhetoric toward left-wing governments in Venezuela and Colombia hints at possible ulterior motives, perhaps even “regime change” in the latter.

In a significant increase in its military presence in the region, the US recently sent an aircraft carrier strike group to Latin America, which sparked rumors of an attempt to overthrow the Venezuelan government.

Shamdasani cited US explanations, but noted that nations have long concurred that the use of lethal force is subject to “careful limits” in the context of the fight against illicit drug trafficking.

She said that the only way to use lethal force unintentionally against someone who poses “an imminent threat to life” is to use it as a last resort. Otherwise, it would constitute extrajudicial killings and constitute a violation of the right to life.

According to Shamdasani, the strikes are occurring “aside from the context” of armed conflict or active hostilities.

Numerous US casualties are reported.

Pete Hegseth, the US’s secretary of defense, announced on Wednesday that the latest military operation was underway in the eastern Pacific Ocean while he claimed a boat was carrying drugs. All four passengers died, in total.

The death toll has increased to at least 61 as a result of Wednesday’s strike, which is the 14th since the campaign started in early September.

Hegseth claimed on Tuesday morning that Washington had attacked boats suspected of distributing illegal narcotics in eastern Pacific Ocean waters, killing 14 people and leaving one of the survivors.

The first time multiple strikes were announced in a single day was with the string of attacks on Monday. A survivor has also been confirmed for the second time since September 2 when the bombing campaign first commenced.

Two survivors, both of whom were repatriated to their home countries on October 16, were reportedly left by another strike.

Why UK’s Prince Andrew lost his princely title – and his stately home

Andrew’s brother, who is now a prince, has been ordered to leave his lavish residence close to Windsor Castle by King Charles III, according to a report released on Thursday by Buckingham Palace. According to observers, the Palace is finally taking action in response to allegations that Virginia Giuffre was sexually abused by the two men while she was a teenager as a result of Andrew’s connections to Jeffrey Epstein, a late sex offender.

Andrew, 65, the younger brother of King Charles and the second son of Queen Elizabeth, is increasingly being investigated for his ties to Epstein and his personal behavior. He was pressured into resigning as the Duke of York earlier this month.

“I’ve made the decision to prioritize my duty to my family and country as I always have.” Five years ago, Andrew said, “I stand by my decision to step down from public life.” He added that he “vigorously denies] the accusations” made against him.

Following years of compromise scandals, Buckingham Palace wants to draw a line. Due to his connections to Epstein, Andrew was fired from a number of royal responsibilities in 2022.

How were Andrew’s ties to Epstein exposed?

Andrew was a more well-known member of the British royal family who was renowned for his military service as a helicopter pilot during the Falklands War in 1982. He was born in 1960.

However, Andrew’s private antics have plagued the royal family’s patience for years and caused embarrassing headlines. For instance, court records in 2024 revealed a suspected Chinese spy as a close friend of Andrew’s business affairs.

However, Andrew eventually had to resign from his royal duties in 2019 due to his persistent ties to Jeffrey Epstein. In 2019 as he waited to be tried on sex trafficking charges, Epstein committed suicide in a US prison.

One of the most prominent accusers of Epstein, Virginia Giuffre, filed a lawsuit against then-Prince Andrew in 2021, alleging rape and sexual abuse. She claimed that, as a minor in the United States, she was repeatedly forced to have sex with him at the age of 17.

Giuffre’s accusations have never been refuted by Prince Andrew, even saying that a now-discredited photo that appeared to show them two together was fake. He agreed to settle the lawsuit in 2022, which he received as much as $ 16 million.

Virginia Giuffre committed suicide in April of this year. She was a 41-year-old woman.

More than two months after the prince told the BBC he had ended all ties with his former associate, according to British newspapers, Andrew had emailed him in February 2011 in an email earlier that month.

Andrew told Epstein that they were “in this together” and would “have to rise above it” during a period of increased media coverage of the Epstein scandal.

Buckingham Palace’s response on Thursday was ultimately provoked by these revelations.

What has been said by Buckingham Palace?

Buckingham Palace announced that Andrew Mountbatten Windsor would be the King’s brother in a statement released on Thursday night.

He will no longer be referred to as “Prince” or “His Royal Highness (HRH), and his royal patronages, including dukedom, earldom, barony, and military ranks, will no longer apply.

Additionally, it was revealed that he will be evicted from his sprawling Royal Lodge, which was once the Queen Mother’s residence, close to Windsor Castle in west London.

He has been given legal protection to remain in residence as a result of his lease on Royal Lodge. He will move to another private accommodation after receiving formal notice to renounce the lease, according to the palace statement.

The statement continued, “These censures are deemed necessary… Their Majesties wish to make clear that the victims and survivors of any and all forms of abuse are in their thoughts and have the utmost sympathies with them,” it continued.

According to a palace source, King Charles made the decision, but he also had the support of the rest of the royal family, including Prince William, the monarchy’s heir to the throne, to lessen the risk of reputational damage.

Culture secretary Lisa Nandy also claimed that survivors of sexual abuse would receive a “powerful message” from the king’s most recent decision in a “truly brave, important, and correct step.”

On October 21, 2025, protesters from the anti-monarchy group Republic demonstrate at Windsor Great Park and Royal Lodge, where Prince Andrew lives.

Why has Royal Lodge expelled Andrew?

After The Times newspaper reported on October 21 that Andrew had not paid rent on his 30-room mansion, known as Royal Lodge, for 20 years, speculation has rifed in the British press.

According to what it was discovered, Andrew was required to pay “one peppercorn” per year for the work that was being done on the property in exchange for carrying out renovations and keeping the mansion.

A British parliamentary committee on Wednesday questioned whether Andrew should still reside in the house, which is owned by the monarch and is located 5 kilometers (3 miles) south of Windsor Castle) in a rare political move.

The BBC also made it known that Prince Andrew hosted Harvey Weinstein, the disgraced film producer convicted of rape, and Ghislaine Maxwell, one of Epstein’s associates who later served time for sex trafficking, at Royal Lodge on October 28.

Just two months after Epstein’s sexual assault conviction was cited in the United States, the three visited Andrew’s home in 2006 to celebrate his daughter’s 18th birthday.

Royal Lodge
On October 21, 2025, a drone capture captures Royal Lodge, a sprawling estate on Windsor Castle’s estate, where former British Prime Minister Prince Andrew resided.

Where will Andrew currently reside?

Andrew’s move to a private Sandringham Estate property, which will be funded by his brother, the king, is reportedly planned.

The Palace has not specified which property he will reside in, despite the fact that the larger Sandringham Estate has about 8,100 hectares (20, 000 acres) and 240 hectares (600 acres) of gardens.

Andrew’s relocation to Sandringham will be “as soon as practicable,” it is also reportedly understood.

Sarah Ferguson, his ex-wife, will also leave Royal Lodge and move into her own housing arrangements. She still lives there with him.

Have other British royals previously lost their titles?

King Charles III’s removal of Prince Andrew’s royal titles is unusual in contemporary British history.

Other royals have voluntarily given up their positions, including King Edward VIII, who wed Wallis Simpson, an American woman who had previously been divorced twice, and Princess Diana, who wed Prince Harry after her divorce from King Charles.

Others have lost their privileges for political reasons, such as Ernest Augustus, Duke of Cumberland, who sided with Germany in World War I, but there hasn’t been a case where an immediate family or a reigning monarch has been stripped of their status for scandal-related reasons.