‘Ban Israeli football’: Scholars urge UEFA to bar Israel over Gaza horrors

More than 30 legal experts have called on the Union of European Football Associations (UEFA) to bar Israel and its clubs from competitions over the atrocities in Gaza.

The letter, addressed to UEFA president Aleksander Ceferin on Thursday, said banning Israel is “imperative”, citing a report by United Nations investigators that confirmed Israel is carrying out a genocide against Palestinians.

Recommended Stories

list of 3 itemsend of list

It urged the football governing body and its members to “fulfil their legal and moral obligations to uphold international law, and move forward with an immediate and complete ban of Israeli football”.

The letter highlighted the damage that Israel is inflicting on the sport in Gaza. At least 421 Palestinian footballers have been killed since Israel began its military offensive in October 2023, and the letter explained that Israel’s bombing campaign is “systematically destroying Gaza’s football infrastructure”.

“These acts have decimated an entire generation of athletes, eroding the fabric of Palestinian sport,” it read.

“The failure of the Israel Football Association (IFA) to challenge these violations implicates it in this system of oppression, rendering its participation in UEFA competitions untenable.”

The letter’s signatories included Elisa von Joeden-Forgey, the executive director of the Lemkin Institute for Genocide Prevention, as well as several former UN experts and scholars in international law.

“UEFA must not be complicit in sports-washing such flagrant breaches of international law, including but not limited to the act of genocide,” the statement said.

It comes amid growing international outrage at Israel’s brutal assault on Gaza, where the Israeli military has killed more than 66,000 people and turned most of the enclave into rubble.

A blockade on humanitarian aid in the territory has also sparked deadly hunger, leading to a declaration of famine in August for more than half a million people in Gaza.

Swift action against Russia

Craig Mokhiber, a former director for the New York office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, said allowing a country that commits genocide to participate in sports allows for its “normalisation”. That, in turn, “is an act of complicity”.

“We remember well the situation in apartheid South Africa, where the world unified to isolate the regime in order to change its behaviour, and that included – very importantly – sports boycotts and cultural boycotts,” Mokhiber told Al Jazeera.

The international football governing body FIFA suspended South Africa in 1961 due to the country’s apartheid regime. The move was seen as a historic triumph for the global movement to end the violence and segregation.

More recently, in 2022, both FIFA and UEFA suspended Russia within days of it launching a full-scale invasion of Ukraine.

“It’s a stunning level of hypocrisy and double standards that they reacted so quickly and so forcefully with regard to Russia because of its invasion of Ukraine, and yet have been dragging their feet in trying to avoid action when it comes to a full-blown genocide by a regime that has been certified as practising apartheid,” said Mokhiber.

Palestinian rights advocates have been calling to ban Israel from world football competitions for decades, in part because Israel has professional teams based in illegal settlements in the occupied West Bank.

FIFA’s rules unambiguously state that “member associations and their clubs may not play on the territory of another member association without the latter’s approval”.

Yet, Israel’s clubs and national teams continue to participate in international competitions through FIFA and UEFA.

Although based in West Asia, Israel joined UEFA in 1994 amid Arab and Muslim boycotts of its teams.

Growing push to ban Israel

As the attacks on Gaza continue, Israel’s national team is participating in the European World Cup qualifiers, and its clubs are competing in UEFA’s continental tournaments, with Maccabi Tel Aviv FC featured in this season’s Europa League.

But calls for ostracising Israel from world football have been gaining momentum in recent months.

Football fans from Glasgow to Paris to Rome to Bilbao have been flying Palestinian flags to show solidarity with Gaza, despite restrictions against such displays.

After Israel killed Palestinian football legend Suleiman al-Obeid in an August air strike, there were also appeals for the violence to end.

One such call came from UEFA itself. The federation published the late footballer’s photo on the social media platform X with the caption: “Farewell to Suleiman al-Obeid, the ‘Palestinian Pele’. A talent who gave hope to countless children, even in the darkest of times.”

But Liverpool star Mohamed Salah criticised UEFA for failing to mention who killed him. “Can you tell us how he died, where, and why?” Salah wrote in a response.

Days later, the pre-game presentation of the UEFA Super Cup featured a banner that said: “Stop killing civilians. Stop killing children.”

The UEFA Foundation also included two Palestinian refugee children in the medal ceremony.

According to multiple news reports from Europe, UEFA was going to vote to suspend Israel soon, but the move was postponed after United States President Donald Trump released a ceasefire plan for Gaza.

Thursday’s letter warned UEFA that Trump’s proposal does not absolve the federation of its responsibility to ban Israel.

“This is because, while the plan purports to offer a pathway to peace, in reality it undermines international law, Palestinian sovereignty, and the principles of self-determination,” it read.

“It does not impose any obligations on the State of Israel, as the occupying power in Gaza, the West Bank and East Jerusalem. It also fails to address the legal consequences of the genocide in Gaza or make any demands of Israel to provide reparations to the Palestinians. Peace cannot be achieved without justice and accountability.”

Human rights nonprofit weighs in

On Wednesday, Amnesty International also called on FIFA and UEFA to suspend Israel.

“As Israel’s national football team gears up for World Cup qualifiers against Norway and Italy, Israel continues to perpetrate genocide against Palestinians in the Gaza Strip,” the group’s chief, Agnes Callamard, said in a statement.

“At the same time, Israel is brutally expanding its illegal settlements and legitimizing illegal outposts in the West Bank as part of its unlawful occupation of Palestinian Territory.”

Since the outbreak of the war on Gaza, no country or club in Europe has withdrawn outright in protest from a game against Israeli teams despite the growing international pleas to shun the country.

A boycott of a match against Israel would give Israel an automatic 3-0 victory.

Ashish Prashar – a campaign director at Game Over Israel, the group that helped organise Thursday’s letter – highlighted football’s role in building a global community, as the most popular sport in the world by far.

“Culture is the way to normalise that in a way that is more valuable to the perpetrators of the genocide than even having a seat at the UN,” Prashar told Al Jazeera.

“So, it is imperative to follow the model that was put before us with apartheid South Africa, of knocking Israel out of culture, but specifically sports and starting with football.”

Game Over Israel has been leading a media campaign underscoring the genocide in Gaza and calling for a football boycott of the country.

Last month, the group sponsored a billboard in New York City’s bustling Times Square that said, “Israel is committing genocide. Soccer federations: Boycott Israel.”

US President Donald Trump stands next to FIFA president Gianni Infantino after Chelsea won against Paris St Germain in the FIFA Club World Cup final in New Jersey on July 13 [File: Kai Pfaffenbach/Reuters]

‘FIFA cannot solve geopolitical problems’

Israel’s top ally, the US, is co-hosting the World Cup next year, and President Trump has been chummy with FIFA chief Gianni Infantino.

In light of the leaders’ warm relationship, Prashar said he is not optimistic that the international federation will make a move against Israel. But he added that individual countries can force FIFA’s hand if they announce boycotts of Israel.

On Thursday, Infantino suggested that FIFA is not ready to penalise the US ally.

“FIFA cannot solve geopolitical problems, but it can and must promote football around the world by harnessing its unifying, educational, cultural and humanitarian values,” he said in a statement.

Mokhiber, the former UN expert, said football should bring people together around positive values, not around a country committing a genocide.

“We know very well how close Infantino is to Donald Trump,” Mokhiber said. “I’m not surprised at all he would make that kind of a statement. I would ask him to look at his history books and see that bans and boycotts in football have been a part of FIFA since the very beginning.”

Prashar also noted the historical precedents and questioned where FIFA would draw the line.

“Gianni Infantino is normalising genocide,” he told Al Jazeera. “Would he have let Nazi Germany play while they were committing the genocide? That is the question I would ask him.”

Argentina’s Congress overturns President Javier Milei’s veto on funding

France detains Russian ‘shadow’ tanker to disrupt war in Ukraine

By putting its captain on trial and detaining an oil tanker suspected of being part of Russia’s so-called “shadow fleet,” France has stated that it is putting more pressure on Russia to stop its invasion of Ukraine.

At a recent EU summit in Copenhagen on Thursday, French President Emmanuel Macron stated that the French government’s detention of the tanker is a part of a new European strategy to halt Russia’s military operations in Ukraine.

Recommended Stories

list of 3 itemsend of list

Macron said, “We want to put more pressure on Russia to persuade it to come back to the table for negotiations.” When we have suspicious ships in our waters who are involved in this trafficking, we have now made the decision to go one step further and implement a policy of obstruction.

The Boracay tanker, which was off the Danish coast last week, was cited by European naval experts as having engaged in drone operations over the nation. The Copenhagen airport was closed last week due to a&nbsp, a series of drone incidents close to the nation’s airports and military bases, and it has experienced significant disruption.

Macron said he had no idea whether the vessel and the drone incursions were connected, but that he could not establish a connection. Russia has denied any involvement.

On Saturday, commandos from the French Navy launched a raid on western France’s Boracay.

According to Stéphane Kellenberger, the prosecutor of the western port city of Brest, an investigation led to the conclusion that the ship, which was headed from Russia to India with a “large oil shipment,” was not flying a flag.

Ships must fly flags at sea and declare themselves to be under the flag of the nation that they have been given nationality under strict guidelines from the UN.

In February, the ship’s captain, a Chinese national, will be tried in France. He faces up to one year in prison and a 150, 000 euro ($176, 000) fine if convicted.

Vladimir Putin, the president of Russia, responded by saying that France’s actions constitute “piracy” and that Europe is to blame for igniting “hysteria.”

“This is piracy,” the statement read. At a forum on foreign policy in the southern resort city of Sochi on Thursday, Putin stated that he was aware of the situation, noting that there was no military cargo aboard the tanker.

How do you deal with pirates, and is that what you call piracy? . . said Putin. You sabotage them, “. The risk of conflict will undoubtedly grow significantly, but it doesn’t mean tomorrow that a war will break out across the world ocean.

Russia has been accused of operating a “shadow fleet” of tankers sailed under flags from nonsanctioning nations and made of old ships that have been used before, frequently by opaque entities with addresses in non-sanctioning nations. Their goal is to assist Russia’s oil exporters in breaking the $60 per barrel capimposed by its allies.

According to Macron, “30 to 40%” of Russia’s war effort is “financed by the shadow fleet’s revenues.”

Hamas says it will respond ‘soon’ to Trump’s proposal to end Gaza war

Hamas’ official says the Palestinian organization will “soon” respond to President Donald Trump’s call to end Israel’s nearly two-year occupation of Gaza.

Mohammed Nazzal, a member of the Hamas political bureau, informed Al Jazeera Arabic on Thursday that the organization was discussing Trump’s plan to end Israel’s occupation of Gaza and would soon make an announcement about its position.

Recommended Stories

list of 3 itemsend of list

Nazzal claimed that Hamas has a right to express its opinions “in a way that serves the interests” of the Palestinian people as representatives of the Palestinian resistance.

According to Nazzal, “We are not dealing]with the plan” when it is believed that time is a sword pointing our way.

A 20-point document was unveiled earlier this week by the White House calling for an immediate ceasefire, the exchange of Hamas prisoners for Palestinian political prisoners held by Israel, the staged Israeli withdrawal from Gaza, Hamas disarmament, and a transitional government led by an international body.

Trump gave Hamas three to four days to approve the plan on Tuesday.

Many Palestinians believe the plan favors Israel, but many Palestinians long for an end to the conflict.

In previous negotiations, Hamas has urged Israel to completely leave the devastated region and requests a permanent ceasefire, as well as guarantees that displaced families will be able to return to their homes, particularly in the north of Gaza, where Israeli forces are mounting attacks.

Egypt working to persuade Hamas

Egypt’s foreign minister earlier on Thursday stated that his nation was working with Qatar and Turkiye to persuade Hamas to accept Trump’s proposal.

Badr Abdelatty, who spoke on Thursday at the French Institute of International Relations in Paris, made the clear point that Hamas needed to disarm and that Israel should not be given a justification for its continued assault on Gaza.

“Let’s not give a single party any justification for using Hamas as a pretext for these outrageous daily killings of civilians.” According to Israeli records, what is happening has already been done well past the seventh of October, he said, referring to the Palestinians’ 2023 rocket attack against Israel, which resulted in 1, 129 fatalities.

More than 66, 000 people have died as a result of Israel’s offensive against Gaza, according to the Palestinian Health Ministry, most of whom are women and children. However, according to experts, the death toll could be up to three times higher.

Beyond retaliation, it is. This is a genocide in action, along with ethnic cleansing. Thus, Abdelatty concluded, “Enough is enough.”

Many “holes need to be filled”

Important mediators Qatar and Egypt claimed that more discussions of Trump’s plan are necessary.

Abdelatty claimed Cairo was working with Qatar and Turkiye to persuade Hamas to support the plan, but he remained cautious.

“It would be very difficult if Hamas refuses, you know.” And of course, there will be more escalation. So that’s why we are making great efforts to get Hamas’ approval and make this plan work,” he said.

Abdelatty claimed that more discussions of the issue were necessary despite his general support for Trump’s proposal for Gaza.

He said, “We need more discussions on how to implement it, especially on two crucial issues: governance and security arrangements, because there are many gaps that need to be filled.” We support the Trump strategy, the end to war, and the need to advance.

When questioned about the potential for Palestinian displacement caused by the Trump plan, he said Egypt would not accept that.

He claimed that displacement would mean the Palestinian cause would never be resolved. Under no circumstances, “We will not allow this to occur.”

Trump, in contrast, warned that if Hamas refused to accept his proposal for Gaza, and that the US president could impose sanctions on Hamas.

The US has frequently pushed Israel’s proposals for getting Palestinian support since the start of the Israeli occupation of Gaza, and then placed Hamas as the main factor in the end.

The president of the United States will have to draw a red line, according to White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt in an interview with Fox News.

Hamas was subsequently requested by Kaja Kallas, the head of foreign policy at the European Union, to accept the proposal.

We demand that Hamas follow the instructions, release all hostages who are still alive, and detain its weapons. The EU pleads with those who have influence to “transmit these messages to Hamas,” according to a statement.

Vladimir Putin, president, stated that only if the plan results in a two-state solution, Russia would be willing to back it.

Hamas “has lost,” according to France’s Foreign Minister Jean-Noel Barrot.

The plan provides safe passage to receiving nations for Hamas members who pledge to peaceful coexistence and surrender their weapons, and for those who want to leave Gaza.

Masa “rejects a very large responsibility for the Palestinians’ devastation,” Barrot told the AFP news agency. It must accept its own surrender, the saying goes.

According to experts, the strategy echoes earlier Western attempts to reshape the Middle East without local support.

Political analyst Xavier Abu Eid told Al Jazeera, “With this agreement, it’s clear that what they’re presenting is a formula that they tried to use before in Iraq, and I think they completely failed.”

Abu Eid noted that many in the region are concerned about Tony Blair’s involvement in Trump’s proposal, which he was referring to as the US war in Iraq in 2003.

Israeli settler who killed Awdah Hathaleen still harassing Palestinians

NewsFeed

Jinon committed the murder of a dearly beloved person. Within hours of the murder of Palestinian activist and father Awdah Hathaleen, Israeli settler Yinon Levi returned to disrupt Umm al-Kheir, an occupied West Bank village. Tariq, Awdah’s closest friend, has first-hand knowledge of it.

Trump memo says US in ‘non-international armed conflict’ with cartels

According to US media, President Donald Trump has informed Congress that his administration has determined that members of drug cartels are “unlawful combatants” with which the United States is engaged in “non-international armed conflict.”

The US military struck three alleged drug smuggling boats in the Caribbean last month, killing 17 people, according to the memo, which was released on Thursday by The Associated Press and The New York Times. According to rights experts and scholars from other world powers, the attacks appear to be unlawful under US and international law, and they are comparable to extrajudicial killings.

Recommended Stories

list of 3 itemsend of list

The administration’s strategy for justifying such attacks and what its strategy might entail are presented in the memo, which is the administration’s most explicit picture yet.

The memo stated that “despite friendly foreign countries making significant efforts to combat these organizations and suffering significant losses of life,” that these organizations are now transnational and carry out attacks throughout the Western Hemisphere as organized cartels.

The President, therefore, determined that these cartels are not state-armed organizations, designated them as terrorist organizations, and declared that their conduct amounts to an armed assault on the US, according to the statement.

The argument expands on the Trump administration’s portrayal of cartels as “narco-terrorists” who aim to destabilize the US by promoting illegal drugs across its borders rather than profit-driven criminal organizations.

Although the Trump administration has labeled a number of Latin American cartels “foreign terrorist organizations,” and has specifically focused on Venezuela’s Tren de Aragua, the memo did not specify the organizations in question.

Only Congress has the authority to declare war or use of force under the US Constitution; however, presidents may unilaterally act in some circumstances, particularly in matters involving the nation’s immediate self-defense.

There is currently no congressional authorization to use military force that would even apply to the Caribbean strikes.

Due to this, Congress members have been under more pressure to assert Trump’s legislative branch’s war powers. The attacks have been welcomed by a number of Republicans in Trump’s party, which controls both the Senate and House of Representatives.

Other lawmakers have warned against allowing Trump’s actions to go unchecked.

Senator Jack Reed, the top Democrat on the Senate Armed Services Committee, wrote in a post on X following Thursday’s reports on Trump’s memo, “Every American should be alarmed that Pres Trump has decided to wage secret wars against anyone he labels an enemy.”

“Drug cartels must be stopped, but it is unacceptable to declare war and amp; to impose lethal military force without the consent of Congress or the general public,” he wrote.

There is “so much wrong” with the Trump administration’s legal justification for the Caribbean strikes, according to Brian Finucane, a senior adviser at the International Crisis Group and former US Department of State attorney.

He cited the claim that Trump “determined” that the US was an “armed attack” on drug smugglers, which supports the administration’s claim that the strikes did not lead to an unlawful conflict.