What evidence does the US government need to deport green card holders?

A Columbia University activist with a green card, a Georgetown University academic with a student visa, a Brown University kidney transplant specialist with a work visa: They are among the people who, despite having legal permission to be in the US, have recently been detained by immigration authorities or denied entry to the US at airports.

President Donald Trump has said he supports legal immigration, and administration officials have given assurances that Trump’s campaign promise of mass deportations would focus on people who have committed violent crimes. But some of the highest-profile examples of attempted deportations are people who have legal permission to be in the US.

Immigration experts said people with visas and green cards have been deported under other administrations, but some of the Trump administration’s actions have been unprecedented.

“The Trump administration has jettisoned typical guidelines and procedures and is looking for arcane passages of immigration law to ensure that it can remove anyone it desires, ideally with limited or no due process,” Matthew Boaz, a University of Kentucky immigration law professor, said.

Columbia University graduate and pro-Palestinian activist Mahmoud Khalil was detained by immigration authorities, who said he could be deported and cited a Cold War-era law. Under that law, the secretary of state can make a noncitizen subject to deportation if their presence or activities could threaten US foreign policy interests. The government has not yet provided evidence for how Khalil has threatened US foreign policy.

Immigration authorities have cited the same Cold War-era law while seeking to deport another Columbia University student involved in the pro-Palestine movement. A federal judge temporarily blocked the student’s detention and deportation.

What evidence do government officials need in these cases, and what are people’s rights?

Immigration experts said the government must show proof to deport a green card or visa holder, but the process can be lengthy. For example, Khalil was arrested on March 8 and has been held in an ICE detention facility in Louisiana as his case proceeds. His lawyers say the detention is unlawful and are trying to transfer the case to New Jersey.

For visa holders at US borders or airports, customs officials can choose to deny people entry without evidence.

People with lawful permanent residence, or a green card, can be deported from the US. But they first have the right to plead their case in court. Only an immigration judge has the power to revoke a green card.

There are several reasons green card holders may be eligible for deportation, including criminal convictions such as rape, murder or drug trafficking.

The government can also deport permanent residents if they commit immigration fraud.

After Khalil had been held in ICE custody for about two weeks, immigration authorities updated his charging documents, accusing him of fraud in his 2024 green card application. The government says Khalil failed to disclose his time working with UNRWA, the United Nations agency for Palestine refugees, and other international groups.

Before the government amended Khalil’s charging document, advocacy groups accused the Trump administration of violating Khalil’s right to free speech. After his arrest, Khalil’s lawyers filed a petition alleging that ICE had arrested and detained Khalil “on the basis of his speech” in a violation of the First Amendment, the American Civil Liberties Union wrote.

Drug-related convictions can also be cause for deportation. Fabian Schmidt, a German engineer and green card holder, was detained after flying back to the US on March 7. Schmidt had a decade-old misdemeanour drug and DUI charge, NPR reported.

Another green card holder, Ma Yang, who has lived in the US since she was eight months old, was deported to Laos in the first week of March after pleading guilty to and serving a sentence for being part of a marijuana trafficking operation, the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel reported.

What evidence does the government have to provide to deport a lawful permanent resident?

The US government must first serve a green card holder with a notice to appear, which is a charging document for immigration cases. In it, the government lists the reasons it believes the person is deportable, Jaclyn Kelley-Widmer, Cornell University immigration law professor, said.

Once someone receives a charging document, an immigration court case is initiated. In court, the US government has the burden of proof and must show through “clear and convincing evidence” – more likely to be true than untrue – that the person can be deported.

The evidence that government lawyers must provide depends on the case. For example, lawyers can use proof of a criminal conviction to show that someone has been convicted of an aggravated felony. Or lawyers could show tax filings to prove someone filed taxes as a nonresident and therefore has abandoned lawful permanent status.

What is the deportation process for people with tourist, student or work visas?

Like legal permanent residents, people with tourist, student or work visas who are already in the US are also given notices to appear if the government believes they are deportable.

Visa holders can be deported for reasons including crime and fraud, if they overstay their visa or if they work without authorisation. Visa holders are afforded the same due process as legal permanent residents, and the government has the burden of proof.

Immigration authorities detained Badar Khan Suri, a graduate student teaching at Georgetown University on a student visa. Suri’s visa has been revoked using the same authority cited in Khalil’s case – that his presence or activities could threaten US foreign policy interests – Politico reported. He is awaiting immigration proceedings.

Visa holders can also be denied entry at an airport or US border, because a visa itself does not grant US entry. Customs and Border Protection officers have the authority to admit people or deny entry. They might deny entry if visa holders have a past criminal conviction, are at risk of overstaying their visas or might be coming to the US to work without authorisation.

For example, in late January, a German tourist who is a tattoo artist was denied after border officials assumed she would illegally work in the US because she was carrying tattoo equipment, The Guardian reported.

Is the Trump administration following the process?

Immigration law experts had differing opinions about whether the Trump administration has followed the legal processes to deport legal permanent residents or visa holders in the US.

“My understanding is, as of right now, they’re following the process,” Boaz, the immigration law professor, said, citing the fact that people have received charging documents and are awaiting court cases. “What’s different is the manner in which it’s being done.”

Boaz said typically people know what type of conduct “would make them a target for removal”, such as not having legal status or having a criminal conviction. That’s not the case under Trump’s administration, as people without criminal convictions and with legal status have been targeted.

Other experts said the administration has deviated from the law.

“Even if the law protects someone from deportation, there is no guarantee today that ICE will abide by the law,” Rebecca Sharpless, University of Miami’s immigration clinic director, said. “People should make choices about things like travel with this reality in mind.”

Immigration agents who arrested Khalil outside his home initially said his student visa had been revoked, although he did not have a student visa, according to the petition filed by Khalil’s lawyers. After Khalil’s wife showed agents that Khalil has a green card, the agents said that was also being revoked.

However, immigration agents can’t revoke legal permanent status; only immigration judges can, after a court proceeding.

“It later came to light that the Department of Homeland Security was charging Mr Khalil” under the Cold War-era provision, the petition said.

The Trump administration also turned away a Brown University doctor at an airport despite a court order preventing it.

Rasha Alawieh, a kidney transplant specialist with a US work visa, was denied entry at an airport after border officials said they found photos of Hezbollah members on her phone, CBS News reported.

Immigration officers said they had not received a judge’s order until after Alawieh had been deported, CNN reported.

The French government said one of its citizens, a scientist, had been denied entry to the US because his phone had messages where he “expressed his ‘personal opinion’ on the Trump administration’s science policies”, Philippe Baptiste, France’s minister for higher education and research, told The New York Times.

“There’s only specific grounds by which somebody can be refused admission to the United States, and disagreeing with Trump, typically, isn’t one of them,” David Leopold, an immigration lawyer and former president of the American Immigration Lawyers Association, said.

What rights do immigrants have when interacting with immigration officials?

People already in the US are protected by the US Constitution. An immigration agent cannot enter people’s homes unless they have a warrant signed by a judge, immigration law experts said. Often, immigration officials have administrative warrants signed by an Immigration and Customs Enforcement officer; those do not carry the same legal weight as a judicial warrant.

To obtain a judicial warrant, immigration officials must “present evidence of a crime to a judge”, Kelley-Widmer said.

At airports, people’s rights vary.

US hits dozens of Houthi targets in Yemen

United States air strikes have hit more than 40 locations across Houthi-controlled parts of Yemen, including in the capital, Sanaa, according to local media affiliated with the rebel group.

Multiple residential homes and shops were damaged in the US attacks before dawn on Friday in the provinces of Saada, Marib, al-Jawf and Hodeidah, reported the Houthi-linked Al Masirah broadcaster.

Other targets included the Sanaa International Airport, which is used for both civilian and military traffic, and mountainous terrain north of Sanaa in Amran, where military camps and other installations are believed to be.

At least seven people were injured across the country in the US strikes, including at least one in Sanaa, Al Masirah reported. It also said that communication networks went down after the attacks.

The US military’s Central Command (CENTCOM), which now has authority from the White House to strike offensively in Yemen without pre-approval, did not immediately acknowledge conducting any raids.

The new campaign of air strikes, which the Houthis say has killed at least 57 people, started after the rebels threatened to restart targeting ships in the Red Sea over Israel blocking aid entering the Gaza Strip for almost a month.

War ‘must be avoided’

The United Nations Special Envoy to Yemen Hans Grundberg late on Thursday emphasised the urgent need for peace after a decade of conflict in the war-torn nation, asserting that stability is critical not only for Yemen but for the entire region.

“The resumption of a full-scale war in Yemen is not in anyone’s interest and must be avoided,” he said during a visit to Brussels, his office quoted him saying in a post on X.

Grundberg noted that diplomacy was key to de-escalation, calling for dialogue and mutual commitment among all parties.

“It is essential that the international community continues to take unified action to ensure a peaceful and sustainable solution for the Yemeni people,” he added.

The Iran-aligned Houthis have launched more than 100 attacks targeting ships in the Red Sea and the Gulf of Aden since November 2023, following Israel’s war on Gaza that began in October that year, saying the raids were in solidarity with Palestinians in the enclave.

During that period, the fighters sank two vessels, seized another, and killed at least four seafarers in an offensive that disrupted global shipping, forcing firms to reroute to longer and more expensive journeys around Southern Africa.

The Houthis also launched dozens of missile and drone attacks on Israel, killing at least one person and causing damage to buildings, including a school in Tel Aviv.

Death toll rises to 28 in weeklong South Korea wildfires

Wildfires sweeping through South Korea since last Friday have killed at least 28 people, injured dozens more and charred about 48,000 hectares (118,000 acres) of forest, according to local news agency Yonhap.

But better visibility and cooler temperatures following overnight rainfall on Thursday have led to improved firefighting conditions against the blazes that were driven by strong winds from central Uiseong county to coastal regions.

Al Jazeera’s Jack Barton, reporting from Uiseong, said, “It’s too early to call it a turning point, but of the 11 big fires that were raging, five have been completely contained overnight.

“And while some are still burning intensely, we are seeing good results in places like Uiseong. Fires are down to 5 percent of what they were,” he said.

Still, about 38,000 residents have so far had to flee affected areas, the government’s disaster response agency has said.

“We plan to mobilise all available resources to extinguish the main flames by the end of the day,” said Lim Sang-seop, chief of the Korea Forest Service told Yonhap.

The fires have been fuelled by dry winds and a prolonged drought, according to officials. Wildfires are not uncommon in South Korea during dry spells.

In recent years, both average temperatures and extreme weather events have increased in the country, significantly raising the risk and severity of fires.

Experts view the increase in wildfires as a sign of the ongoing effects of climate change.

Al Jazeera’s Barton reported that “many houses and farms across this area [around Uiseong] have been destroyed. Many people, tens of thousands, have been evacuated and remain displaced.

“South Korea’s acting president Han Duck-soo said that ‘all efforts will be taken’ to help people access financial resources to get their homes rebuilt. He said that money should be limitless,” Barton said.

“Local governments are saying they will try and move them out of the tent evacuation camps as quickly as possible in temporary process. But it will be a long process,” he added.

An 81-year-old apple farmer walks with sticks over debris past her neighbours’ homes, burned by a wildfire two days ago, in Andong on March 27, 2025 [Yasuyoshi Chiba/AFP]

The many ways Israeli settlers steal Palestinian homes

On Monday, Ghassan Abdel Basset and his family left their home in the occupied West Bank to visit a relative.

They were going to break their fast together during the holy month of Ramadan.

Later that evening, their neighbours informed them that Israeli settlers had invaded their home.

Ghassan hurried back to confront the settlers, but the Israeli army intervened to block him and his family from getting back to their house.

The settlers claimed they bought the home, but the Abdel Basset family never put it up for sale.

“The settlers claim they bought the house from someone, but nobody gave this person the legal right to sell our house,” Ghassan told Al Jazeera.

“God willing, we will follow the legal procedures [in Israel], and the law will take its course,” he added.

An armed Israeli settler talks to another settler and two members of the Palestinian Abdel Basset family, whose home in Hebron city near the Israeli settlement area of Tel Rumeida was taken over by Israeli settlers on March 24, 2025 [Hazem Bader/AFP]

Accelerated expulsion

Israel’s occupation of the Palestinian territory is illegal under international law. As an occupier, Israel is not allowed to transfer its citizens into occupied territory or enforce its national laws there.

However, more than 750,000 Israeli settlers live in illegal settlements in the West Bank, and many have forged property deeds to provide a veneer of legality to confiscate Palestinian homes.

This is one of several strategies that state-backed settlers use to uproot Palestinians, according to analysts, Palestinians and local rights groups.

Settlers – backed by the Israeli state – also vandalise homes, set up outposts, attack farmers, destroy crops and steal livestock under the supervision of the Israeli army.

According to a recent report by Peace Now and Kerem Navot, two Israeli human rights groups, Israeli settlers currently control 14 percent of Palestinian land in the West Bank.

About half of this land has been confiscated since Israel’s most recent government came to power in December 2022, marking a serious escalation.

Since Israel began its genocidal war on Gaza in October 2023, its far-right government has stepped up land annexations and evictions in the West Bank, rights groups, local monitors and analysts told Al Jazeera.

“There are a lot of tools settlers use to cause the displacement of Palestinians,” said Diana Mardi, a researcher with Bimkom, an Israeli human rights group.

“They tend to use violence to get Palestinians to reach a point where they feel they have to leave their homes,” she told Al Jazeera.

Bedouins and farmers at risk

Farmers and Bedouin communities are most at risk from attacks and evictions by Israeli settlers.

The report by Peace Now and Kerem Navot found that at least 60 percent of Palestinian herder communities have been uprooted from their lands since 2022.

On top of that, 14 illegal outposts have been erected on land that Palestinian farmers, herders and Bedouins used to live on.

The report added that settlers tend to use animal herding to encroach on Palestinian land and intimidate farmers, a technique known as grazing.

a man in grey robes stands next to a charred car
A Palestinian stands beside a torched car in the aftermath of an attack by suspected Israeli settlers in the West Bank village of Jinsafut on January 21, 2025 [Majdi Mohammed/AP]

[BELOW: We have two spellings for his name. Please change so all mentions are consistent]

Leith, a Palestinian farmer who did not disclose his last name for fear of reprisals, said settlers often try to take over farmland in his village east of Ramallah in this way.

He added that the settlers often vandalise crops and block Palestinians from tending to their land in his village.

After facing constant threats and attacks by settlers, who are often protected by the Israeli army, Palestinians often abandon their livelihoods.

“To protect their families, they have to leave the area. Many of them have children that they need to keep safe, but they lose their main source of income [from farming] when they leave,” Mardi explained.

“The settlers are trying to take over our land,” Leath said. “When the army is present with armed settlers, that means it’s not easy. It’s not easy for us to resist.”

‘Animals have more rights than us’

United States President Donald Trump’s administration has further emboldened Israel’s settler movement, said Omar Rahman, an expert on Israel-Palestine with the Middle East Council on Global Affairs.

Rahman stressed that settlers benefit from a climate of impunity when they attack Palestinians and steal their land, yet Trump has abandoned any pretext of supporting human rights globally or backing aspirations for an independent Palestinian state.

“The other aspect is that Trump is surrounded by people who are not just backers of Israel but of ‘Greater Israel’. That means they believe the land biblically belongs [exclusively] to Israelis,” Rahman told Al Jazeera.

After Trump was inaugurated on January 20, he quickly signed an executive order to lift sanctions on settlers whom the previous administration deemed to be “extremists” and responsible for undermining the two-state solution.

The order was issued one day after a temporary ceasefire came into effect in the Gaza Strip to pause what United Nations experts and legal scholars say is a campaign of Israeli genocide against Palestinians.

The next day, settler attacks surged across the West Bank.

Palestinians expelled from their homes or uprooted from their farms are trickling into nearby villages or relocating to urban centres that are under the ostensible control of the Palestinian Authority, the entity governing major cities in the West Bank and engaged in security cooperation with Israel.

Leith said five or six families have moved into his village after settlers expelled them from their farms – all after October 7, 2023, the day the Gaza war began.

He promised to never leave his village despite growing fear of settler attacks and despite what he sees as Western apathy towards Palestinians and their plight.

“Nobody cares about human rights. Human rights is just one big lie,” he told Al Jazeera.

Bangladesh up against time to find stolen billions: Central bank governor

Following deadly street protests that led to the dramatic flight of then-Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina, the country’s newly appointed banking chief launched a cat-and-mouse search for large sums of money that its political and business elites had smuggled abroad in August 2024, just days after the Awami League government in Bangladesh collapsed.

Over the past ten years, Bangladesh Bank has established 11 specialist teams to track the assets of 11 powerful families who have been accused of laundering billions of dollars into the United Kingdom, the United Arab Emirates, the United States, Malaysia, and Singapore.

The amounts involved are astounding. One of the 11 families being investigated is suspected of removing $ 15 billion worth of funds from Bangladesh, and in one instance, removing nearly 90% of a single bank’s deposits, causing the bank to close to collapse.

Former IMF economist Ahsan Mansur, who was appointed governor of Bangladesh Bank shortly after the government’s collapse, is concerned that a lot of the money could vanish if not quickly discovered. We are aware that time is of the essence. He tells Al Jazeera, “The asset base may collapse.”

His starting place is the UK. In an effort to track down and seize an estimated $25 billion in laundered from Bangladesh, Mansur is currently in discussions with the British Foreign and Commonwealth Office and London law firms.

We believe we will find a lot of assets here because many of these families already have their assets, particularly in London,” he says.

“Our whole goal is at least to make people aware that Bangladesh is one of the countries where stolen goods arrive, and the UK is a favorite destination for stolen goods everywhere in the world,” he says.

A “moral imperative”

Saifuzzaman Chowdhury, a former land minister, is one of the people of interest who, according to Al Jazeera’s Investigative Unit (I-Unit), owns more than $500 million in real estate, primarily in Dubai and London.

The Chowdhury’s family purchased more than 360 luxury apartments in the UK, most of which were in London, according to the I-Unit last year.

Nearly 40 of his bank accounts have been frozen and he has been subject to a travel ban, according to Bangladesh’s Anti-Corruption Commission, but the central bank is urgently attempting to freeze his overseas properties to prevent them from being allegedly sold.

Chowdhury asserts that his wealth was legitimately earned despite the fact that he is the target of a politically motivated “witch-hunt” against those connected to the previous government.

Mansur wants the authorities to look into the lawyers, bankers, and estate agents who assisted the “oligarch” families while Bangladesh Bank is focused on freezing assets.

“The law is being flouted, agents or operators, banks that are frequently working with the criminals to rehabilitate them in this country, which is not the only one. There are numerous more. I believe that taking a tougher stance against those things is morally required by the nation’s authorities.

Evidence amnesty?

Mansur says it could take five years for the authorities to recover laundered funds, admits progress has been slow because of the complexity and scale of the task, but claims the UK government is assisting.

He is now thinking about offering plea deals to those who helped to transfer money offshore in exchange for evidence against the kingpins, or even a form of amnesty to bring the stolen funds back to Bangladesh.

Another important point is that the challenging task of tracking billions of dollars across various jurisdictions has become more difficult as a result of the US’s transition of government.

After President Donald Trump frozen funding for the US Agency for International Development (USAID) in the first few months of his new term, a team of US investigators who were scheduled to begin work in Bangladesh this year were called off.

Trump orders removal of ‘improper ideology’ from top US museums

The Smithsonian Institution, the largest museum complex in the world, will be awash with what he describes as “corrosive” anti-American ideology, according to Donald Trump, the president of the United States.

In one of his most recent executive orders, which read “Restoring Truth and Sanity to American History,” Trump appointed Vice President JD Vance to lead the changes and “restore the Smithsonian Institution to its rightful place as a symbol of inspiration and American greatness.”

According to Trump’s executive order, “The Smithsonian Institution has recently come under the influence of a divisive, race-centered ideology.”

The Smithsonian institutions included those that Trump’s order listed as supporting “narratives that portray American and Western values as inherently harmful and oppressive” as well as exhibits at the American Art Museum and the National Museum of African American History and Culture.

According to the executive order, “Museums in our Nation’s capital should be places where individuals go to learn,” rather than “to be subjected to ideological indoctrination or divisive narratives that distort our shared history.”

The National Zoo and 21 individual museums are housed at the Washington, DC, institution. The National Museum of American History and the National Museum of Natural History are two of the most well-known. The Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution includes Vice.

According to the order, “It is the policy of my administration to restore Federal sites dedicated to history, including parks and museums, to solemn and uplifting public monuments that remind Americans of our extraordinary heritage, consistent progress toward becoming a more perfect Union, and unmatched record of advancing liberty, prosperity, and human flourishing,” the order states.

Trump’s decision to change programming at the John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts in Washington, DC, comes after a similar one in February. In a similar way, the president appointed himself as chairman to oversee the changes.

Trump has taken steps to reverse policies that were widely used under President Joe Biden’s administration and support “diversity, equity, and inclusion” since his inauguration in January.

Additionally, Trump and other Republicans want to stop “critical race theory,” which examines how racism is ingrained in American institutions. Following the significant racial reckoning that was started by the police killing of Black American man George Floyd in 2020, the theory has gained widespread support, particularly on museum and university campuses.

The Smithsonian will be prohibited from hosting or funding exhibits that “degrade shared American values, divide Americans based on race, or promote programs or ideologies that are incompatible with Federal law and policy” under Trump’s executive order.

Additionally, it was forbidden to house exhibits that celebrate trans women at the Women’s History Museum, which is still being developed.