Why is there a mixed reaction in India to the US trade deal?

Trump and Modi hail agreement but details remains vague.

India and the US announce a trade deal, with relief from some of US President Donald Trump’s harshest tariffs.

Trump says India will stop buying Russian oil and open up to US business.

So, why’s the deal getting a mixed reaction in India?

Presenter: Rishaad Salamat

Guests:

Ajay Chhibber – Distinguished visiting scholar at the Institute for International Economic Policy at George Washington University

Biswajit Dhar – Trade economist and former professor at Jawaharlal Nehru University

Return through Rafah: Palestinian women recount Israeli interrogation

Khan Younis, Gaza Strip – When Rotana al-Raqab learned that her name and her mother’s were included on the first list of Palestinians allowed to return to Gaza through the Rafah crossing, she felt, briefly, that the long months she had spent stranded in Egypt were finally coming to an end.

But what she initially believed would be a path back to her five children instead turned into a gruelling ordeal of hours of waiting, body searches, interrogations, and humiliating treatment at the hands of Israeli forces.

Recommended Stories

list of 3 itemsend of list

Rotana, 31, left Gaza last March with her mother, Huda Abu Abed, 56, seeking urgent medical treatment after being told she needed a major heart operation.

They left behind Rotana’s six children with family members, who at the time were displaced in the al-Mawasi area of Khan Younis.

Throughout the separation, Rotana says the fear of what was happening at home – as Israel continued its genocidal war on Gaza – never left her.

“All that time, I was on edge, waiting for the crossing to open so that I could return to my children,” she told Al Jazeera.

“My husband was injured in an Israeli strike, and I was nearly going mad with fear and worry. I spoke with them every day despite how hard calls and internet access were.”

From Egypt to Rafah 

Rotana and Huda found out that they would be allowed to return to Gaza the day before the crossing partially opened on Monday.

They were contacted by the Palestinian embassy in Cairo, which gave them the news that they were among the names on the first list of those crossing.

The reopening of the crossing is part of the second phase of the Gaza ceasefire deal, which the United States said had begun in mid-January, despite the continuation of Israeli attacks on Gaza.

Rafah is the only border crossing from Gaza that does not cross Israeli territory. But it has been largely closed since Israeli forces took control of it in May 2024.

Multiple returnee testimonies indicate that the crossing is functioning only partially, allowing very small numbers of people to use it on each side.

Reports from the opening days show that some travellers were sent back at the Palestinian side of the crossing, despite having already cleared Egyptian procedures, often for unspecified “security screening” reasons, or over the size of their luggage, without a detailed official explanation from Israeli authorities.

According to Egyptian officials, roughly 50 people reached the Palestinian side of the crossing on Tuesday, but Israeli authorities forcibly returned 38 of them, permitting only 12 to enter Gaza after extensive searches, detentions, and interrogations.

Rotana describes approximately 50 travellers being present on the Egyptian side of the crossing on Monday.

After completing procedures there, the group waited for hours for the Palestinian side of the gates, under the control of Israel, to open, a delay that lasted until evening hours.

But even then, not everyone was allowed to pass.

“At first, they let nine people through and told [others] to wait. A little later, they let [some of us] pass, but the rest were sent back,” she said, adding that she believed Israel was behind the decision.

Egyptian media – citing Egyptian officials – also reported that roughly 50 people reached the Palestinian side of the crossing on Tuesday, but that Israeli authorities forcibly returned 38 of them, permitting only 12 to enter Gaza after extensive searches, detentions, and interrogations.

Since its partial reopening on Monday, the Rafah crossing between Egypt and Gaza has allowed only very limited movement.

In the first days of operation, just more than 120 people have crossed according to the Gaza Ministry of Interior – the majority of them returning to Gaza – while dozens more, including patients in need of urgent medical care, were prevented from crossing.

Palestinian health authorities report that tens of thousands remain on waiting lists, including more than 18,500 patients requiring specialised treatment unavailable inside Gaza, as a result of Israel’s devastation of the enclave.

Israel has framed the restrictions as being necessary for security reasons.

Body searches and interrogation

Finally, by Monday evening, Rotana and Huda were able to cross to the Palestinian side, where the European Union Border Assistance Mission for the Rafah Crossing Point (EUBAM Rafah) are operating.

Rotana thought that their ordeal was finally over – and that she would finally be able to reunite with her children and husband. Instead, she met a new phase of hardship.

“They put us into a vehicle flanked by Israeli army cars, one in front and one behind and then stopped us in an open area,” she said.

There, Rotana and the others were subjected to full-body searches carried out by a woman accompanied by two men who identified themselves as part of “counterterrorism forces” – an apparent reference to Palestinian militias working with the Israeli military in Gaza.

“One of them told us they were fighting terrorism and lived in a ‘humanitarian city’, welcoming anyone who wanted to join them,” she added.

“I didn’t engage with his remarks, and then they began scolding us because we wanted to return to Gaza.”

Following this, Rotana was taken for interrogation by an Israeli military officer, which she said lasted for three hours. “It was interrogation, pressure, and degrading language,” she recounted.

Rotana said she and the others were insulted by the officer, who attempted to provoke them, and called them “humiliated”.

She remembered being asked, “Why did you come back to Gaza? Do you want to live in a tent without water or electricity? Or on a roof that doesn’t exist?”

“I tried to hold myself together and not let his words affect me,” she said.

Huda described having her hands bound and eyes covered before she, too, was interrogated.

“[An Israeli soldier] even told me to tell my family to prepare immediately for forced relocation from Gaza,” she said, referencing the threat by the Israeli right-wing to force Palestinians to leave Gaza in what would be ethnic cleansing.

During her own two hours of detention, Huda was separated from her daughter and said the experience was frightening.

“I was terrified. The place around me was dark and empty like a desert, and I didn’t know where they had taken Rotana and the other women, until they released me and I saw them again in the bus,” she said.

Return

In a press statement, the International Commission to Support Palestinian People’s Rights (ICSPR) strongly condemned the strict Israeli restrictions on the operation of the crossing, saying that they had turned “travel and return [to Gaza] into a symbolic procedure that falls short of a genuine and comprehensive opening”.

The ICSPR added that Israeli restrictions – including requiring pre-approved security clearances, imposing strict passenger quotas, and enforcing complex procedures for travel – had turned the Rafah crossing “into a tool of control and domination rather than a humanitarian passage”.

The organisation also condemned the treatment of Palestinians at the crossing, including beatings, humiliating body searches, prolonged handcuffing, confiscation of personal belongings, and threats of arrest.

When Rotana and Huda were finally allowed to continue their journey, they found that Israeli forces had confiscated nearly all of what they had packed for the children.

“I brought toys and headphones for my daughters … things to make them happy,” Rotana said.

“They took everything. Even food was forbidden,” she explained. “I had promised my children sweets, something to celebrate with after months of hardship, but they took all of it.”

Despite it all, reuniting with Rotana’s children – Huda’s grandchildren – was at the forefront of their minds.

“I returned with my daughter even before I completed my treatment because her children couldn’t bear to be apart from her any longer,” Huda told Al Jazeera.

“In the end, we are returning to our country no matter what, so why were we treated this way?”

After a long and exhausting day, Rotana and her mum arrived in Gaza late at night on Monday, at the Nasser Medical Complex in Khan Younis.

“The journey was deadly … but thank God, we finally arrived and reunited with our loved ones,” Rotana said calmly.

Colombia’s EGC suspends Doha peace talks over Petro-Trump meeting

The Gaitanist Army of Colombia (EGC), the country’s largest criminal organisation, has announced it will temporarily suspend peace talks in Qatar after Colombian President Gustavo Petro reportedly pledged to target its leader.

In a social media post on Wednesday, the EGC, sometimes referred to as the Gulf Clan, indicated the suspension would continue until it received updates from the Petro administration.

Recommended Stories

list of 3 itemsend of list

“By order of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, the EGC delegation at the negotiating table will temporarily suspend talks with the government to consult and clarify the veracity of the information,” the group wrote in a statement on X.

“If the media reports are true, this would be a violation of good faith and the Doha commitments.”

Colombia’s Defence Minister Pedro Sanchez confirmed the reports later on Wednesday, sharing a list of three drug “kingpins” that Petro’s administration would prioritise as “high-level targets”.

Among the three targets was the EGC’s leader, Jesus Avila Villadiego, alias Chiquito Malo. A reward for his capture was set at 5 billion Colombian pesos, equivalent to $1.37m.

The other two “kingpins” included top rebel commanders identified only by their aliases: Ivan Mordisco and Pablito.

The public announcement echoes a private one cemented during a closed-door meeting on Tuesday at the White House, when Petro met United States President Donald Trump in person for the first time.

For months, Trump has pressured the Petro administration to take more “aggressive action” to combat narcotics trafficking out of Colombia.

In response, Petro and his team presented the Trump administration on Tuesday with a dossier on their counter-narcotics operations titled, “Colombia: America’s #1 Ally Against Narcoterrorists”.

The presentation featured statistics on cocaine seizures, programmes to eradicate coca crops, and the high-level arrests and killings of drug lords.

But the commitment to collaborate with the US in the pursuit of Chiquito Malo’s arrest has thrown negotiations with the EGC into peril.

It has also raised questions about the future of Petro’s signature policy, “Total Peace”, which was designed to open talks with rebel groups and criminal networks in an effort to halt Colombia’s six-decade-long internal conflict.

The EGC is a major criminal group with almost 10,000 members, according to a recent report by the Ideas for Peace Foundation.

In December, the US also designated the group as a “foreign terrorist organisation”, as part of its ongoing efforts to crack down on drug trafficking.

The EGC has been engaged in high-level discussions with the Colombian government in Doha since September 2025. The two parties signed a “commitment to peace” on December 5, which outlined a roadmap to the EGC putting down arms.

The first step towards demobilisation was for the group to gather its forces in temporary zones, beginning in March. The government had suspended arrest warrants in December for EGC commanders, including Chiquito Malo, who were due to move to these areas.

But the government’s plans to detain the drug lord, declared yesterday at the White House, destabilised this process, according to analysts.

“[The EGC] interpret this as a direct threat where, if any commander who has arrest warrants … goes to the temporary zones, he runs a high risk,” said Gerson Arias, a conflict and security investigator at the Ideas for Peace Foundation, a Bogota-based think tank.

The Colombian Supreme Court in January approved Chiquito Malo’s extradition to the US in the eventuality of his capture, but the final decision to extradite him resides with the president.

By declaring the drug lord a “target” at the White House, Petro signalled support for capturing and extraditing the EGC commander.

Potential US involvement in the operation also appears to have unsettled the criminal organisation, according to experts.

“It is very different for Chiquito Malo to be pursued solely by the Colombian government than for him to become a target of joint strategic value involving US intelligence,” said Laura Bonilla, a deputy director at the Peace and Reconciliation Foundation, a Colombian think tank.

Although the EGC suspended its peace talks on Wednesday, it stressed that it remained open to resuming negotiations.

“It should be clarified that the suspension is temporary, not permanent, which indicates that they [the talks] will resume shortly,” a lawyer for the group told Al Jazeera, on condition of anonymity.

Russia criticises US as final nuclear warhead treaty set to expire

Russia says it is “no longer bound” by limits on the number of nuclear warheads it can deploy, as the last remaining nuclear arms control treaty with the United States is set to expire.

The New START treaty, which was signed in 2010, will expire on Thursday. Russia said that the US had not responded to President Vladimir Putin’s proposal to keep observing the missile and warhead limits in the treaty for another 12 months.

Recommended Stories

list of 3 itemsend of list

“We assume that the parties to the New START treaty are no longer bound by any obligations or symmetrical declarations within the context of the treaty,” the Russian Foreign Ministry said in a statement on Wednesday.

“Essentially, our ideas are being deliberately ignored. This [US] approach appears mistaken and regrettable,” it said.

New START, which stands for Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty, limits the deployment of strategic nuclear weapons, those designed to hit an adversary’s key political, military and industrial centres.

Deployed weapons or warheads are those in active service and available for rapid use as opposed to those that are in storage or awaiting dismantlement.

The expiry of the treaty means that Moscow and Washington will both be free to increase missile numbers and deploy hundreds more strategic warheads, although this poses logistical challenges and will take time.

Despite the expiry of the treaty, US President Donald Trump has expressed interest in a new agreement to restrict nuclear weapons.

During an interview with The New York Times in January, Trump said of the New START treaty: “If it expires, it expires. … We’ll just do a better agreement.”

Trump has also called for China to be involved in any future nuclear talks.

New START was a 10-year agreement signed by then-US President Barack Obama and Dmitry Medvedev, a close ally of Vladimir Putin who served a single term as Russia’s president from 2008 to 2012. It came into effect in 2011.

Fears of new arms race

Security experts say the end of New START risks ushering in a new arms race that will also be fuelled by China’s rapid nuclear build-up.

“Without the treaty, each side will be free to upload hundreds of additional warheads onto their deployed missiles and heavy bombers, roughly doubling the sizes of their currently deployed arsenals in the most maximalist scenario,” Matt Korda, associate director for the Nuclear Information Project at the Federation of American Scientists, told Reuters News Agency.

As the clock ticked towards the treaty’s expiry on Thursday, Pope Leo urged both sides to not abandon the limits set in the treaty.

What is Tarique Rahman’s vision for Bangladesh?

Sreenivasan Jain challenges BNP secretary Mirza Fakhrul on whether the party and its leader really represents change.

Bangladesh is heading into a historic election after the 2024 uprising that toppled Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina and sidelined the Awami League. The Bangladesh Nationalist Party has emerged as the frontrunner after years on the margins.

In this interview, Sreenivasan Jain speaks to BNP Secretary-General Mirza Fakhrul Alamgir about Tarique Rahman’s vision for the country and whether the BNP genuinely represents political change.

‘Treacherous assassination’: Who was Saif al-Islam Gaddafi?

NewsFeed

Saif al-Islam Gaddafi, former Libyan leader Muammar Gadaffi’s most prominent son, and his number 2 between 2000 and 2011, was killed by “four masked men” in his Zintan home in what his political team blasted as a “cowardly and treacherous assassination”. But who was he?