American football player Marshawn Kneeland dies at 24

Warning: This story contains details about suicide that some readers may find disturbing. If you or a loved one is experiencing suicidal thoughts, help and support are available. Visit 988 Lifeline for more information about support services. 

Marshawn Kneeland, a defensive end for the American football team, the Dallas Cowboys, has died at the age of 24, the National Football League franchise said.

Recommended Stories

list of 3 itemsend of list

The Frisco police department in Texas said on Thursday that Kneeland appeared to have taken his own life after he was involved in a vehicle pursuit and a multi-agency search late on Wednesday.

Police said Kneeland did not stop for Texas Department of Public Safety (DPS) troopers over a traffic violation on Wednesday night.

They said officers from the Frisco police department joined in the pursuit of Kneeland’s car, which was found a little before 11pm local time (05:00 GMT, Thursday) after it had crashed on southbound Dallas Parkway.

The driver, identified as Kneeland, abandoned the car and walked away from the scene. The Texas DPS said a trooper had tried to pull him over for an alleged traffic violation, and he did not stop.

After instituting a search using both K-9 and drone units, law enforcement found Kneeland dead at 1:31am on Thursday.

Frisco police said they learned Kneeland had expressed suicidal thoughts following a call to the emergency dispatch on Wednesday night. The official cause of death will be determined by the Collin County medical examiner.

The Cowboys announced the death of Kneeland, a second-year player, on Thursday.

“It is with extreme sadness that the Dallas Cowboys share that Marshawn Kneeland tragically passed away this morning,” the statement said.

“Marshawn was a beloved teammate and member of our organization. Our thoughts and prayers regarding Marshawn are with his girlfriend Catalina and his family.”

Kneeland scored his first career touchdown Monday in the Cowboys’ 27-17 loss to the Arizona Cardinals.

“I watched him fight his way from a hopeful kid at Western Michigan with a dream to being a respected professional for the Dallas Cowboys,” his agent, Jonathan Perzley, said in a statement.

Trump says he was ‘very much in charge’ of Israel’s June 13 attack on Iran

United States President Donald Trump has claimed responsibility for Israel’s initial attack on Iran, contradicting previous US assertions that the Israeli government acted unilaterally.

“Israel attacked first. That attack was very, very powerful. I was very much in charge of that,” Trump told reporters on Thursday.

Recommended Stories

list of 3 itemsend of list

“When Israel attacked Iran first, that was a great day for Israel because that attack did more damage than the rest of them put together.”

His comments came as he called on Republicans to revoke the filibuster to pass laws in the Senate with a simple majority. He argued that his party should move on the Senate rule first in the same way that Israel launched the war against Iran.

Israel launched a devastating assault against Iran without direct provocation on June 13, killing several top generals and nuclear scientists as well as many civilians.

Iran responded with hundreds of missiles against Israel.

The US subsequently joined the Israeli war effort by bombing Iran’s three major nuclear facilities.

But in the early hours of the war, Washington stressed that Israel acted on its own and warned Tehran against retaliating against US troops and interests in the region.

“Tonight, Israel took unilateral action against Iran. We are not involved in strikes against Iran, and our top priority is protecting American forces in the region,” US Secretary of State Marco Rubio said at that time.

A ceasefire was reached after Iran launched a missile attack against a US air base in Qatar.

Since then, Trump has been increasingly taking credit for the outcome of the war, repeatedly claiming that the US “totally obliterated” the Iranian nuclear programme.

But on Thursday, the US president suggested he had initiated the war from the start.

For its part, Tehran has not provided a public assessment of the state of its nuclear sites, but Iranian officials have stressed that the country’s nuclear programme remains viable through the knowledge Iran has acquired over the years.

It is also unclear what happened to Iran’s stockpiles of highly enriched uranium.

Trump campaigned against starting new wars, promoting himself as a “peace” candidate.

During the war, he faced pressure from segments of his own base to keep the US out of the conflict.

In recent weeks, Trump has reiterated that he would like to reach a deal with Iran that would see Tehran forge formal ties with Israel.

In the early months of his second presidency, Trump opened negotiations with Iran over its nuclear programme, and repeatedly stressed that he wants an agreement with Tehran.

But with the nuclear file apparently dormant, analysts say there is no sense of urgency in Washington to restart talks with Tehran.

Afghanistan and Pakistan exchange fire as ceasefire talks resume in Turkiye

Pakistan and Afghanistan have traded blame for brief cross-border fighting, as delegations from both countries met in Turkiye for talks aimed at securing a ceasefire following deadly clashes last month.

Thursday’s talks in Istanbul are intended to finalise a truce approved on October 19 in Qatar that ended a week of deadly clashes between the South Asian neighbours, which killed dozens of people, including soldiers and civilians, and wounded hundreds of others.

Recommended Stories

list of 4 itemsend of list

Security issues are at the heart of their dispute, with Islamabad accusing Kabul of harbouring groups such as the Pakistan Taliban (TTP), which is accused of launching attacks in Pakistan. The Taliban government in Afghanistan denies these allegations.

“While the third round of negotiations with the Pakistani side has begun in Istanbul, unfortunately, this afternoon Pakistani forces once again opened fire on Spin Boldak, causing concern among the local population,” Afghan government spokesman Zabihullah Mujahid said on Thursday.

The city of Spin Boldak is located in the southern Afghan province of Kandahar.

“The Islamic Emirate’s forces, out of respect for the negotiation team and to prevent civilian casualties, have so far shown no reaction,” Mujahid said on X.

Pakistan denied the accusation, pinning the blame on Afghanistan.

“We strongly reject claims circulated by the Afghan side regarding today’s incident at the Pak-Afghan border at Chaman,” Pakistan’s Ministry of Information & Broadcasting posted on X. “Firing was initiated from the Afghan side, to which our security forces responded immediately in a measured and responsible manner.”

Hamdullah Fitrat, deputy spokesman for the Taliban authorities, told the AFP news agency that “we don’t know the reason” for the Pakistani fire.

Ali Mohammed Haqmal, head of Kandahar’s information department, said the firing was brief. Residents told AFP it lasted 10-15 minutes.

Pakistan confirmed that calm had been restored.

Negotiations in Istanbul reached an impasse last week when it came to finalising ceasefire details, with each side accusing the other of not being willing to cooperate.

Both sides also warned of a resumption of hostilities in case of failure.

Despite the ceasefire, all important border crossings between Pakistan and Afghanistan remain closed to trade and civilian movement. The crossings were shut on October 12, though Pakistan has partially reopened two of those to allow Afghan refugees to return home.

Host Turkiye said at the conclusion of last week’s talks that the parties had agreed to establish a monitoring and verification mechanism to maintain peace and penalise violators.

Fifty civilians were killed and 447 others wounded on the Afghan side of the border during clashes that began on October 9, according to the United Nations. At least five people died in explosions in Kabul that the Taliban government blamed on Pakistan.

Dutch court rejects bid to halt arms exports to Israel over Gaza war

A Dutch appeals court has dismissed an attempt by human rights organisations to stop the Netherlands from selling weapons to Israel.

Ten pro-Palestinian NGOs had filed a lawsuit accusing the Dutch state of doing too little to prevent what they described as “genocide” in Gaza with a “clearly unlawful” foreign policy towards Israel.

Recommended Stories

list of 3 itemsend of list

They urged judges to impose a blanket ban on weapons exports to Israel, a ban on exporting military dogs, and a ban on trading in the occupied territory.

A Dutch court rejected their case last year, saying the state has some leeway to decide its policies and courts should not rush to step in.

The NGOs had cited a January 2024 order to Israel by the International Court of Justice (ICJ) to prevent acts of genocide in Gaza. The UN’s top court said it was plausible that Palestinians were being deprived of some rights protected under the Genocide Convention.

On Thursday, the Hague Court of Appeal dismissed the groups’ appeal, saying that, although “there is a serious risk that Israel will commit genocide against the Palestinian population in Gaza,” the Dutch government has “considerable discretion” to determine foreign policy and issues of national security.

In a written ruling, the court said it could not order a blanket ban because the plaintiffs had not shown the government was routinely failing to consider whether exported arms or dual-use goods would be used to violate rights.

The court also ordered the organisations to pay legal costs.

“While it is plausible that there is a risk of genocide and serious human rights violations, it is not, in principle, up to the court to prescribe to the State what measures must be taken to prevent this,” said the court in a statement.

The group of NGOs were hoping the lawsuit would force the Dutch to stop sending weapons and trained police dogs to Israel and cut economic ties with businesses operating in occupied Palestinian territory. They argued that the Dutch state, as a signatory to the 1948 Genocide Convention, has a duty to take all reasonable measures at its disposal to prevent genocide.

However, while the court in The Hague said Thursday that the Netherlands did have that obligation under the Genocide Convention — noting there was “a grave risk” that Israel was committing genocide in Gaza — it ultimately ruled the Dutch government already did enough to discourage companies from working in occupied Palestinian territory.

The Dutch government has denied it violated the 1948 Genocide Convention, drawn up following World War II.

“Every cooperation is cautiously weighed,” government lawyer Reimer Veldhuis said during a hearing last year.

The Dutch government says it has halted most arms exports to Israel and only allows parts for defence systems, such as the Iron Dome.

Israel’s war on Gaza has killed at least 68,875 Palestinians and wounded 170,679 since October 2023. At least 1,139 people were killed in Israel during the October 7, 2023, Hamas-led attacks and more than 200 others taken captive.

Weight-loss drug makers announce pricing agreement with Trump

United States President Donald Trump, Eli Lilly and Novo Nordisk have unveiled a deal to slash the prices of popular GLP-1 weight‑loss drugs for the government’s Medicare and Medicaid programme, as well as for cash payers.

The deal, announced on Thursday, is aimed at increasing access to treatments through US Medicare for people aged 65 and above and the Medicaid programme for low-income people, which together provide healthcare coverage for nearly half of all Americans.

Recommended Stories

list of 4 itemsend of list

US patients currently pay by far the most for prescription medicines, often nearly three times more than in other developed nations, and Trump has been pressuring drugmakers to lower their prices to what patients pay elsewhere.

“It’s going to equalise the world,” Trump told reporters from the Oval Office, noting that Lilly and Novo would be providing their other medications to Medicaid at “most-favoured-nation” prices.

The event ended abruptly when an attendee in the Oval Office collapsed.

Starter doses of rival weight‑loss pills being developed by Lilly and Novo, if approved, will cost $149 per month for all Medicare and Medicaid enrollees and via the White House’s new direct-to-consumer site, TrumpRx, senior administration officials said.

For currently available injectable GLP-1s used for diabetes and other covered health issues, prices would fall to $245 per month for patients with Medicare or Medicaid, they said.

On TrumpRx, the average price of injectables and pills will start at or below $350 monthly and is expected to trend downwards to $245 within two years.

Lilly announced that the lowest dose of Zepbound will be available for $299 per month, with additional doses priced at $449 per month for cash-paying patients under the new deal.

In Medicare, patients’ co-pays will be capped at $50 a month, officials said.

Commercial health insurers would also be able to access prices estimated to be 25 percent lower than current cash prices, they said.

The government will also expand coverage for GLP-1s under the deal, officials said, to overweight patients with prediabetes or heart problems, obese patients with comorbidities and severely obese patients, accounting for 10 percent of Medicare patients.

Currently, Medicare does not typically cover the drugs for obesity. Coverage in Medicaid, which is run by each state and jointly financed with the federal government, varies.

The agreed prices will come into effect no later than January for cash payers, by mid-2026 for Medicare patients and on an ongoing basis for Medicaid enrollees, depending on when states sign up.

Administration officials said the companies would get relief from tariffs as part of the deal. Lilly said it would be exempted from tariffs for three years.

The officials also said Novo and Lilly will receive fast-track regulatory vouchers for some of their future drugs.

Novo’s Wegovy and Lilly’s Zepbound are the only highly effective GLP-1 weight-loss drugs sold mainly in the US as weekly injections. List prices top $1,000 a month, though both offer cash buyers a $499 monthly supply.

Novo Nordisk has committed to an additional $10bn investment in the US, according to a White House fact sheet.

Lilly said the agreement will improve access to medications for nearly 40 million Americans covered by government insurance programmes, as well as millions more who pay out-of-pocket.

It said it would add its diabetes medications – Emgality, Trulicity, and Mounjaro – to its direct-to-consumer platform, offering them at 50 percent to 60 percent below their current list prices.

Wall Street reacts

Deutsche Bank analysts saw the deal as a potential catalyst for Lilly’s growth. It estimated that a $150 monthly cap could unlock access for up to 15 million Americans when applied to orforglipron, its experimental weight-loss pill that succeeded in a late-stage trial.

Deutsche Bank said increased uptake would come from the estimated 20 percent of obese adults who would prefer pills to needles. About 2.7 million Americans currently take Lilly’s injectable Zepbound, it said.

Lilly and Novo are racing to bring oral GLP-1 treatments to market. Novo’s once-daily oral Wegovy is under Food and Drug Administration review with a decision expected later this year, while Lilly’s orforglipron is set for regulatory submission by the end of the year and a potential launch in 2026.

BMO Capital analyst Evan Seigerman said Lilly’s dominance in the GLP-1 space continues to deepen, with physicians and patients increasingly favouring its drugs.

Pfizer and AstraZeneca previously signed new pricing agreements tied to the TrumpRx platform.