Meta, TikTok and YouTube face landmark trial over youth addiction claims

The tech companies’ first ever jury arguments against their claims against their platforms, including YouTube, TikTok, and Meta, are set for a landmark trial in court.

The jury selection process is anticipated to last at least a few days as the case moves forward on Tuesday in Los Angeles County’s California Superior Court, where 75 potential jurors are questioned daily through at least Thursday.

Recommended Stories

list of 3 itemsend of list

For thousands of other lawsuits seeking damages for social media harms, the trial is regarded as a test case. Snapchat’s parent company Snap Inc., the lawsuit’s fourth party, settled the matter last week for an undisclosed sum.

The trial, which will last six to eight weeks, is expected to feature executives including Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg.

A Californian woman, identified as KGM, 19, claimed she became dependent on the company’s platforms when she was just a teenager. She asserts that this was accomplished by deliberate design choices made by businesses that wanted to increase revenue by making their platforms more enticing for children.

She claims that the apps caused her to have suicidal thoughts and feel depressed, and she is suing the companies for damages. This case, which the plaintiffs refer to as “social media addiction,” is the first to be tried in court this year.

According to the lawsuit, “Defendants deliberately integrated a range of design features into their products to maximize youth engagement to drive advertising revenue,” “using heavily from the behavioral and neurobiological techniques used by slot machines and exploited by the cigarette industry.”

According to experts, the Big Tobacco trials, which led to a 1998 settlement that forbids cigarette manufacturers from paying billions of dollars for medical expenses and restricts marketing to minors, are similar.

If successful, this argument could obstruct Section 230, which exempts tech companies from liability for content posted on their platforms, and the companies’ First Amendment shield.

The tech companies have employed attorneys who have represented businesses in well-known addiction cases.

They contest the claims that their products intentionally harm children, citing a number of safeguards they have added over the years, and contend that they are not responsible for third-party content posted on their websites.

At dozens of high schools across the US, Meta has sponsored parent workshops on teen online safety for at least the past two years. Additionally, TikTok sponsored other gatherings and provided tutorials on features, including the option to set a nighttime screen limit.

Mothers Against Media Addiction, the founder of the organization that supports smartphone bans in schools, reported to Reuters as saying tech companies were “using every lever of influence that you can imagine.”

Parents who are unsure of their faith can be very perplexed, she continued.

On Monday, the lower house in France approved a ban on using social media for children under the age of 15. Before a final vote in the lower house, the legislation will now pass to the Senate.

Why Japan’s economic plans are sending jitters through global markets

Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi’s tax and spending pledges in advance of snap elections next month have sent jitters through global markets.

Japanese government bonds and the yen have been on a rollercoaster since Takaichi unveiled plans to pause the country’s consumption tax if her Liberal Democratic Party wins the February 8 vote.

Recommended Stories

list of 4 itemsend of list

The market turmoil reflects concerns about the long-term sustainability of Japan’s debt levels, which are the highest among advanced economies.

The volatility has extended beyond Japan, highlighting broader fiscal sustainability worries in an era in which the United States and other major economies are running huge deficits.

What has Takaichi promised on the economy?

Takaichi said last week that she would suspend the country’s 8 percent consumption tax on food and non-alcoholic beverages for two years if her government is returned to power, following her dissolution of the House of Representatives.

Based on Japanese government data, Takaichi’s plan would result in an estimated revenue shortfall of 5 trillion yen ($31.71bn) each year.

Takaichi, a proponent of predecessor Shinzo Abe’s agenda of high public spending and ultra-loose monetary policy, said the shortfall could be made up by reviewing existing expenditures and tax breaks, but did not provide specific details.

Takaichi’s tax pledge comes after her Cabinet in November approved Japan’s largest stimulus since the COVID-19 pandemic.

The package, worth 21.3 trillion yen ($137bn), included one-time cash handouts of 20,000 yen per child for families, subsidies for utility bills amounting to about 7,000 yen per household over a three-month period, and food coupons worth 3,000 yen per person.

Why have Takaichi’s pledges unnerved markets?

Japan’s long-term government bond yields soared following Takaichi’s announcement.

Yields on 40-year bonds rose above 4 percent on Tuesday, the highest on record, as investors exited from Japanese government debt en masse.

Bond markets, through which governments borrow money from investors in exchange for paying out a fixed rate of interest, are closely watched as a gauge of the health of countries’ balance sheets.

While typically offering lower returns than stocks, government bonds are seen as low-risk investments as they have the backing of the state, making them attractive to investors seeking safe places to park their money.

As confidence in a government’s ability to repay its debts declines, bond yields rise as investors seek higher interest payments for holding riskier debt.

“When Prime Minister Takaichi announced a planned reduction in consumption taxes, this made existing bond-holders of Japan’s debt uneasy, requiring a higher compensation for the risk they bear,” Anastassia Fedyk, an assistant professor of finance at the Haas School of Business of the University of California, Berkeley, told Al Jazeera.

“As a result, bond prices dropped and yields rose. And yes, this is a general pattern that applies to other countries, too, though Japan has an especially high level of debt, making its position more vulnerable.”

Japan’s debt-to-GDP ratio already exceeds 230 percent, following decades of deficit spending by governments aiming to reverse the country’s long-term economic stagnation.

The East Asian country’s debt burden stands far above that of peers such as the US, UK and France, whose debt-to-GDP ratios are about 125 percent, 115 percent and 101 percent, respectively.

At the same time, the Bank of Japan (BOJ) has been scaling back bond purchases as part of its move away from decades of ultra-low interest rates, limiting its options for interventions to bring yields down.

“Bond investors reacted because her headline package looks like large, near-term fiscal loosening at exactly the moment the BOJ is trying to normalise policy,” Sayuri Shirai, a professor of economics at Keio University in Tokyo, told Al Jazeera.

How does all this affect the rest of the world?

The sell-off in Japanese bonds reverberated through markets overseas, with yields on 30-year US Treasuries rising to their highest level since September.

As Japanese bond yields rise, local investors are able to earn higher interest payments at home.

That can incentivise investors to offload other bonds, such as US Treasuries.

As of November, Japanese investors held $1.2 trillion in US Treasuries, more than any other foreign group of buyers.

In an interview with Fox News last week, US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent expressed concern about the impact of Japan’s bond market on US Treasury prices and said he anticipated that his Japanese counterparts would “begin saying the things that will calm the market down.”

Japan’s long-term bond yields fell on Monday amid the expectations that Japanese and US authorities would step in to prop up the yen.

On Friday, The New York Times and The Wall Street Journal reported that the Federal Reserve Bank of New York had inquired about the cost of exchanging the Japanese currency for US dollars.

“Japan matters globally through flows. If Japanese government bond yields rise, Japanese investors can earn more at home, potentially reducing demand for foreign bonds; that can nudge global yields and risk pricing,” Shirai said.

“This is why global-market pieces have framed Japan’s bond move as a wider rates story.”

Higher bond yields in Japan, the US and elsewhere raise the cost of borrowing and servicing the national debt.

In a worst-case scenario, a sharp escalation in interest rates can lead to a country defaulting on its debts.

Masahiko Loo, a fixed income strategist at State Street Investment Management in Tokyo, said that the reaction of international investors to Takaichi’s plans reflects growing sensitivity to fiscal credibility in highly indebted economies.

“Yes, Japan may be the spark, but the warning applies equally to the US and others with large structural deficits,” Loo told Al Jazeera.

Is Japan on the verge of a financial crisis?

Probably not.

While Japan is more indebted than its peers, its fiscal position is more sustainable than it might appear due to factors specific to the country – at least in the short to medium term – according to economists.

The vast majority of Japan’s debt is held by local institutions and denominated in yen, reducing the likelihood of a panic induced by foreign investors, while interest rates are far lower than in other economies.

“The debt situation is more manageable than a lot of people think,” Thomas Mathews, head of markets for Asia Pacific at Capital Economics, told Al Jazeera.

“Net debt-to-GDP is on a downward trajectory, and Japan’s budget deficit isn’t all that big by global standards.”

Loo of State Street Investment Management said that the turmoil surrounding Japan had more to do with a “communication gap around fiscal sustainability and policy coordination” than the country’s solvency.

Spain to host 2030 World Cup final, its football federation president says

Spain will host the final of the 2030 World Cup, which it is cohosting with Portugal and Morocco, according to Rafael Louzan, president of the Royal Spanish Football Federation.

Morocco wants to play the game at Casablanca’s Grand Stade Hassan II, a sizable stadium that is currently being constructed north of the city. However, Louzan has other objectives.

Recommended Stories

list of 4 itemsend of list

Spain has demonstrated its organizational prowess over time. At a meeting organized by the Madrid Sports Press Association late on Monday, Louzan declared that it would lead the 2030 World Cup and that the final of that World Cup would take place here.

For instance, at Barcelona’s Camp Nou or Madrid’s Bernabeu, the two top candidates, Louzan did not specify a location for the game.

The new stadium for Casablanca is anticipated to have 115, 000 capacity when it is finished in late 2028. Faouzi Lekjaa, president of the Royal Moroccan Football Federation (FRMF), requested a final game between Spain and Morocco in Casablanca last year.

The Barcelona-based Camp Nou stadium, which is undergoing renovations, is a strong contender for the 2030 Olympic Games.

Louzan also made reference to the difficulties Morocco faced while hosting the Africa Cup of Nations, including the tumultuous scenes that occurred during this month’s Senegal vs. Morocco match.

Senegal won the match, but fan protests and fan disruptions temporarily halted play.

Moroccan football is actually undergoing a transformation, Louzan said. We must acknowledge the success of our efforts. However, scenes from the Africa Cup of Nations have ruined the reputation of international football.

The location of the final has not been provided by FIFA, the FRMF, or the Portuguese Football Federation.

Gaza’s unequal dead: 10,000 Palestinians under rubble, one Israeli captive

To retrieve one body, the Israeli military mobilised a fleet of tanks, drones, and what locals described as “explosive robots”.

They turned a neighbourhood into a “kill zone”, dug up approximately 200 Palestinian graves, and left four civilians dead in their wake.

The focus of this overwhelming force was Ran Gvili, an Israeli policeman killed more than two years ago, the last Israeli captive in Gaza after more than two years of Israel’s genocidal war on the besieged enclave.

His successful recovery on Monday was hailed by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu as a triumph of commitment. But just metres (yards) away from where Gvili’s remains were carefully extracted, a very different, gruesome reality persists.

According to the National Committee for Missing Persons, more than 10,000 Palestinians remain entombed under the rubble of Gaza, decomposing in silence, lost and without identity.

Families grieve without closure for their missing, presumed dead loved ones.

There are no explosive robots clearing the way for them, no forensic teams flying in to identify them, and no global outcry demanding their recovery.

International media do not rush to break news about them.

The digging up of the al-Batsh cemetery in Gaza City’s Tuffah neighbourhood has become a visceral symbol of a deadly double standard: A world where one Israeli corpse commands the attention of an army, while thousands of Palestinian bodies are treated as part of the decimated, apocalyptic landscape.

(Al Jazeera)

A ‘kill zone’ around the graves

Khamis al-Rifi, a journalist in Gaza who reported from the vicinity of the incursion, detailed the sheer scale of force used to isolate the area.

“It started with exploding robots and air strikes … clearing the path for the tanks,” al-Rifi told Al Jazeera. He explained that approaching the cemetery was impossible, as tanks enforced a deadly perimeter, firing at anything that moved.

From his position near the “Yellow Line”, Israel’s self-proclaimed buffer zone inside Gaza, al-Rifi described a “wall of fire” created by artillery and helicopters to protect the engineering units. Inside this sealed zone, witnesses and video footage obtained later revealed that the forces spent two days churning up the earth.

“They dug up about 200 graves,” al-Rifi said. “They pulled the martyrs out, tested them one by one until they found the [Israeli] body.”

The disparity was most evident in the aftermath. Gvili’s remains were airlifted for dignified burial in Israel. The Palestinian bodies, however, were left to the mercy of bulldozers.

“When citizens went to the area [after the withdrawal], they found the martyrs put back randomly … covered with sand by the bulldozers,” al-Rifi said. “Some bodies were still visible on the surface.”

‘The world’s largest graveyard’

While Israel used satellite technology and DNA labs to close the chapter on its missing policeman, Palestinian families are denied even the basic machinery to dig.

Alaa al-Din al-Aklouk, spokesperson for the National Committee for Missing Persons, stated last November that Gaza has become “the world’s largest graveyard”.

“These martyrs are buried under the rubble of their homes … without their last dignity being preserved,” al-Aklouk said. He highlighted the “fatal injustice” of an international community that mobilised resources for Israeli captives while blocking the entry of heavy civil defence equipment needed to recover Palestinian victims.

Mustafa Barghouti, secretary-general of the Palestinian National Initiative, told Al Jazeera on Monday that while he respects the right of any family to bury their dead, the contrast is inescapable. “The lack of equal treatment, the lack of respect to Palestinians as equal human beings, is really astonishing,” he noted.

A cost paid in blood

The dark irony of this Israeli mission is that it created new victims. On Tuesday morning, as residents approached the desecrated cemetery to check on the graves of their loved ones, Israeli fire struck again.

“Four martyrs fell in the area this morning,” al-Rifi said, noting that one of them, his relative Youssef al-Rifi, had simply gone to inspect the destruction left behind.

Alcaraz crushes de Minaur to reach Australian semis; Svitolina beats Gauff

With a dominant 7-5, 6-2, 6-1 victory over local favorite Alex de Minaur, Carlos Alcaraz’s career Grand Slam bid is still alive at Melbourne Park.

The 22-year-old eliminated de Minaur’s hopes after five years of waiting for a homegrown men’s champion at Rod Laver Arena in Melbourne on Tuesday, swapping extravagance for efficiency.

Recommended Stories

list of 4 itemsend of list

Alcaraz, a six-time major winner, broke de Minaur early to take a 3-0 lead, but his retooled serve was exposed in the fifth game when he faced three break points.

De Minaur resisted and won the ninth game before recovering a second break in the ninth, delighting the center-court crowd by holding in the following, but some loose points gave Alcaraz a gripping opening set.

Alcaraz put the pressure on himself in the second set by opening up the second set with a pair of rasping backhand crosscourt winners to take the lead.

Alcaraz won the match and advanced to face Alexander Zverev, the third seed, in the third set after a deflated de Minaur gave up his serve early in the third set.

“I’m just really happy how I’m playing every game,” he said. My level is rising each round, Alcaraz warned his rivals.

“Today I felt really at ease and I’m proud of how good I was playing tennis.”

German Zverev defeated American Learner Tien 6-3, 6-7, 6-1, 7-6, 7-3 to claim his last-four spot earlier in a 6-3, 6-7, 5-7, 6-1, 7-6 victory.

Alcaraz praised Zverev, saying, “I have seen him throughout the entire tournament, and I know he is playing great, aggressive tennis.”

“I must be ready,” he says of my entire team.

We must play tactically extremely well, they say. It will be a very interesting battle.

On Wednesday, Novak Djokovic, a 10-time Melbourne champion, will face Lorenzo Musetti, Italy’s fifth-seeded player, in the other two quarterfinals.

In the semifinals, the winner will face eighth-seeded American Ben Shelton or two-time defending champion Jannik Sinner.

In the quarterfinals, Elina Svitolina of Ukraine squares off against Coco Gauff of the United States. Quinn Rooney/Getty Images

Svitolina hopes that Ukraine will be “a little light” after the Gauff incident.

Elina Svitolina expressed hope that Coco Gauff’s stunning upset of third-seeded Ukrainians will lighten their bitter winters as a result of Russia’s brutal assault on them.

Aryna Sabalenka, the 31-year-old world number one, defeated the American 6-1, 6-2, to advance to the semifinals.

Svitolina avoids tussling with Russian and Belarusian opponents like other Ukrainian players do.

She praised her overwhelming victory over Gauff as “great for my country.”

It’s very important to me to see a lot of Ukrainians supporting tennis, which is great because it’s one of the most difficult winters for Ukrainians without electricity and everything.

When my friends are watching my matches, I feel like I should pass this light, a little light, just positive news to Ukrainians. It gives me a wonderful feeling.

Throughout the nearly four-year conflict, Russia has targeted Ukraine’s energy infrastructure, particularly in the winter, leaving many Ukrainians without electricity or heating.

Former world number three Svitolina was playing her 14th Grand Slam quarterfinal a decade earlier than Gauff.

She had only previously and never before advanced to the semis in Australia.

Svitolina, who won the tournament for the first time this month in Auckland and is on a 10-game winning streak, was “very, very pleased with the tournament so far.”

She will re-enter the top 10 if she makes it to the semifinals.

“It’s always been my dream to return after maternity leave to finish in the top ten.” Always been what I wanted, she said.

To me, “It means the world.”

Gauff, a two-time Grand Slam champion, was left in disarray by her broken serve, which she had four sets to go with, and two more when she was broken.

She committed 19 unforced errors while receiving only 41% of her first service points.

Gauff immediately broke after serving during the entire tournament.

With husband Gael Monfils watching, Svitolina and husband Gael Monfils both failed to capitalize on her failure and also conceded her serve. Gauff then caused two double faults to be broken once more at crucial points.

She was clearly frustrated as the Ukrainian ran to 5-1 with a fifth double fault of the match, giving Svitolina yet another break and the set in 29 minutes. She was broken three more times, which she loved.

After the first-set annihilation, Gauff summoned a ball kid, demanded that three racquets be restrained, and left the court for a toilet break.

But it was ineffective. To start set two, she was broken five straight times.

She finally succeeded in holding onto her sixth attempt without retaliation.