Slider1
Slider2
Slider3
Slider4
previous arrow
next arrow

Pattern of defiance: Israel expands settlements in face of Western pressure

Israel’s international allies are voicing a growing chorus of condemnation for the occupied West Bank’s continued construction of illegal settlements and its war against Gaza.

UN experts, human rights organizations, and academics have all previously reported to Al Jazeera that Israel is carrying out a genocide in Gaza and engaging in violations that might amount to war crimes and crimes against humanity in the West Bank.

Israel approved 22 illegal settlements in the West Bank less than two weeks after receiving stern warnings from its Western allies, making it the largest land grab since Israeli and Palestinian leaders signed the Oslo Peace Accords in 1993.

“Israel is all about educating the public about who is the leader.” They claim that you can condemn us at any time, but you will ultimately bow down to us, not the other way around, according to Diana Buttu, a political analyst and legal expert with an emphasis on Israel and Palestine.

The Oslo Accords allegedly had the intention of establishing a Palestinian state with East Jerusalem as its capital and the Gaza Strip and the West Bank.

According to analysts, Israel has continued to expand illegal settlements in practice, making the two-state solution a reality.

pattern of truncation

Israel has frequently announced the construction of additional illegal settlements in response to UN or its allies’ declarations of support for Palestinian statehood.

After the Palestinian Authority (PA), a body established to govern large portions of the West Bank as a result of the Oslo Accords, received non-member observer status in the UN General Assembly, Israel went so far as to approve 3, 000 new settler homes in the occupied West Bank in 2012.

Bezalel Smotrich, Israel’s far-right finance minister, warned last year that every nation that recognizes a Palestinian state will construct a new illegal settlement.

Spain, Norway, and Ireland made the symbolic move in May 2024, with the announcement coming soon thereafter.

Omar Rahman, an expert for the Middle East Council for global affairs, said, “I certainly believe there is a pattern where Israel responds to pressure regarding its occupation … or anything else, by announcing settler expansion.”

He told Al Jazeera, “We see that pattern repeating itself over and over.”

Israel has continued to test its allies’ patience as the world’s attention mounts against Israel’s occupation of Gaza.

A group of European, Asian, and Arab diplomats on an official mission to assess the humanitarian crisis at the Jenin refugee camp, which has been the subject of the Israeli army’s ongoing attack and siege for the past few months, were shot on May 21 by Israeli troops.

“I don’t know where the red line is,” she said. There is no red line, Buttu said, “it is obvious.”

demonstrating inaction

Israel has increasingly annexed and occupied the little Palestinian land that is still alive after Zionist militias ethnically cleansed some 750, 000 Palestinians in 1948, a process known as the “Nakba” or catastrophe.

According to Khaled Elgindy, a visiting scholar at Georgetown University’s Center for Contemporary Arab Studies, the annexation of the occupied West Bank has increased in recent years as a result of the presence of far-right settlers in the Israeli government.

He believes that Israel had no intention of approving the 22 illegal settlements, despite the joint statement from France, the UK, and Canada because it complied with the state’s ultimate plan to expand Jewish settlement in the occupied West Bank.

No one would have believed that if those nations hadn’t announced that [further] annexation wasn’t going to occur. He assured Al Jazeera that it would happen, of course.

In contrast to Western pressure, Rahman, a member of the Middle East Council, claims that Israel’s strategy of announcing pre-planned settlement expansion is merely a means of dissuading its allies from taking concrete steps.

He believes that any actions taken against Israel will likely result in a backlash against Palestinians, as they have threatened to do. Instead, he believes that Canada, the UK, and France will likely use the argument that any actions taken against them will likely result in targeted sanctions being imposed on Israeli officials.

Rahman told Al Jazeera, “[Canada, UK, and France] may claim to be supporting the two-state solution by failing to do anything to save it.”

Analysts think that Israel’s use of sanctions would be the only way to end Israel’s two-state solution and end its conflict with Gaza, but they also acknowledge that full sanctions against the Israeli state are still unlikely at this point.

Instead of Smotrich and Itamar Ben-Gvir, far-right ministers most closely associated with pro-settler policies, such as Canada, France, and the UK, may be the targets of sanctions.

These men are attempting to “jam in everything they can do right now,” Elgindy told Al Jazeera. “These men are trying to keep their positions of power indefinitely,” Elgindy said.

Buttu fears that only the nations of Europe will adopt more symbolic measures, such as “recognizing Palestine,” which will have little impact on the ground.

US Supreme Court clears greater path for ‘reverse discrimination’ claims

In a victory for conservatives who have long fought back against laws that protect minorities, the Supreme Court of the United States has ruled that it will be easier for people to file a lawsuit against workplace “reverse” discrimination based on identities like being white or heterosexual.

Marlean Ames, a woman from Ohio who claimed she was turned down for a promotion at work because she is straight, received a unanimous ruling from the nation’s highest court on Thursday.

A lower court had previously ruled that plaintiffs from some majority groups must present “background circumstances” to support their employer’s claim that they are “that unusual employer who discriminates against the majority” rather than minority groups that have historically faced discrimination in the US.

We draw the conclusion that Title VII does not impose a higher standard on plaintiffs from majority groups, according to liberal justice Ketanji Brown Jackson. The judgment below is therefore vacated, and the case is remanded for the proper prima facie standard.

The decision on Thursday could have an impact on lawsuits in 20 different states and the District of Columbia, breaking a precedent that required groups that had not previously experienced discriminatory practices to file claims for workplace civil rights violations.

Conservatives in the US have argued for years that measures to address the legacy of race discrimination against ethnic and racial minorities, such as taking race into consideration when applying for jobs or academic admission, themselves constitute a form of discrimination against white people.

Ames previously claimed that she was instead “pushed aside” at her position at the Ohio Department of Youth Services.

In 2020, she brought a lawsuit for damages alleging that Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act had been violated.

Trump speaks with China’s Xi amid trade, student visa tensions

As the two countries continue to tangle over trade, which Trump has aggressively reshape through a number of tariffs, Donald Trump has phoned Chinese President Xi Jinping.

The US requested the phone call on Thursday, according to Xinhua, a state-run newspaper in China. Trump had earlier stated that it was challenging to reach a deal with China.

Trump stated in the opening readout of the call that “I just had a very good phone call with Chinese President Xi to talk about some of the intricacies of our recently reached, and agreed to, Trade Agreement.” The call ended up being approximately one and a half hours long for both countries.

“The complexity of Rare Earth products should no longer be in question.” In due course, our respective teams will meet at a date that is not yet known. President Xi graciously invited the First Lady and I to China, and I accepted,” he continued.

Trump also noted that neither the Russia-Ukraine war nor the Iran nuclear talks were mentioned, and that the conversation was almost entirely focused on trade.

Trump had stated on Wednesday that he liked China’s President XI, and that he would always do so. However, he is VERY Tough AND VERY HARD TO MAKE A DEAL WITH! “!.

Chinese State TV quoted Xi as saying that after the call on Thursday, the two nations should work together for a successful outcome and that dialogue and cooperation are the only options available to both. He urged that the two sides respect each other’s needs.

Xi added that the US should take very “carefully” with the Taiwan issue.

In response to the Trump administration’s trade war, China and the US reached a 90-day deal on May 12 to lower tariffs, but tensions have persisted.

Beijing faced significant tariffs from Washington, but it eventually ceased because of concerns about a potential economic collapse between the world’s two largest economies.

Trump has been accused of causing significant economic disruptions before backtracking when China or the European Union retaliate with force.

The Trump administration has also threatened to revoke student visas for those affiliated with the Chinese Communist Party or who, according to the government, pose ambiguous threats to US national security. During the academic year 2023-2024, more than 277, 000 Chinese students enrolled in US universities.

China claimed that these actions, along with others that targeted China’s technology sector, violated the May-US temporary trade agreement.

According to a recent statement from Beijing’s Ministry of Commerce, “These practices seriously violate the consensus.”

World reacts to Trump’s travel ban, hits several nations mired in conflict

In a move he claimed was intended to shield the US from “foreign terrorists,” Donald Trump has signed an executive order that prohibits citizens from entering the nation, which is consistent with a contentious policy he made during his first term in office.

Nationals from 12 countries will be prohibited, according to Trump’s intensified crackdown on immigration, which was a pillar of his previous stints in office and on the campaign trail.

Seven nations will also be subject to partial restrictions, which means they will no longer be able to apply for temporary visas for immigrants or non-immigrants. Some temporary work visas will still be available, though.

Trump cited a Colorado attack where a man threw a petrol bomb into a crowd of pro-Israel demonstrators as evidence of the need for immigration restraints.

In a video message from the Oval Office posted on X, Trump said, “The recent terror attack in Boulder, Colorado, has highlighted the extreme dangers posed to our country by foreign nationals who are not properly vetted.”

He continued, “We don’t want them.”

A man was detained on June 1 after being detained by the police at a protest calling for the release of Israeli prisoners held in Gaza.

According to an affidavit from the US Department of Justice, Suspect Mohamed Sabry Soliman was accused of a federal hate crime and a number of state crimes. Soliman was born in Kuwait and is an Egyptian national.

Trump’s list of prohibited nations includes neither of these nations, both of which the US has established strong, long-term ties with.

This most recent travel ban comes in the wake of a Trump executive order from 2017 that prohibited citizens from seven Muslim-majority nations, also known as the “Muslim ban.”

Seven of the nations on the new list of those banned also have Muslim-majority populations, and a number of them have ongoing conflicts.

The ban won’t apply to current visa holders, foreign diplomats, athletes and their teams, among other exemptions, despite the new suspensions.

The ban is anticipated to go into effect on June 9 at 12:01 am EDT (04:01 GMT).

How has the ban changed the world, in this case.

African Union

The AU, which includes seven of the 12 nations on the travel ban list, claimed the ban would damage “people-to-people ties, educational exchange, commercial engagement, and broader diplomatic relations” that were established with the US over the years.

The African Union Commission respectfully appeals to the US.
the bloc said in a statement that the administration should think about starting a dialogue with the nations involved and to consider adopting a more consultative approach.

Oxfam America

Abby Maxman, president of Oxfam America, claimed that the decision was not based on “national security.” According to Maxman, “It is about sowing division and demonizing communities in the United States.”

Somalia

Dahir Hassan Abdi, the US ambassador to Somalia, stated in a statement that Mogadishu “values its longstanding relationship with the US.” Abdi stated that “Somalia] is ready to engage in dialogue to address the concerns raised.”

Venezuela