US kills five in attack on alleged drug boats, searches for survivors

New Year’s Eve celebrations as the world welcomes 2026

As nations one time zone at a time transition to 2026, New Year’s Eve celebrations are taking place all over the world.

Large crowds gathered at public viewing points and fireworks greeted midnight in the first major cities to celebrate the new year.

Countries from across the Americas will mark the end of the global transition with celebrations that span from Times Square in New York City to Rio de Janeiro’s beaches.

Trump says ‘removing’ National Guard from Chicago, Los Angeles and Portland

In a significant policy change, US President Donald Trump announced that he would stop deploying federal troops to several Democratic-controlled cities.

Trump’s plans to send National Guard members to Chicago, Illinois, Los Angeles, California, and Portland, Oregon are all set to suffer legal difficulties, according to the announcement on Wednesday.

Recommended Stories

list of 3 itemsend of list

Trump claimed in a post on Truth Social that he is “removing” the National Guard from those cities despite the fact that lower courts had already limited their deployment.

Despite the fact that these great Patriots have greatly reduced CRIME in those cities, and only by that fact, he said, “We are removing the National Guard from those cities.”

The National Guard is prohibited from participating directly in law enforcement, which is still prohibited by US law. Trump had not used the Insurrection Act of 1807, which allows presidents to deploy troops domestically when “unlawful obstructions, combinations, assemblages, or rebellion” against the federal government render it “impracticable to enforce” US law in the ordinary course of judicial proceedings.

Due to this, immigration enforcement was largely tasked with providing support services to troops deployed in or around Los Angeles, Portland, and Chicago.

At the time of Trump’s announcement, there were 200 National Guard members who were still under federal control in Portland as well as Los Angeles and Chicago.

Trump has claimed repeatedly that major US cities have been hit by repeated overlapping crime and immigration crises since deploying the National Guard in Los Angeles in response to protests against mass immigration enforcement sweeps.

Trump has been accused of engaging in risky political theater to harm opponents by critics.

Trump’s statement made no mention of the state’s Republican governor’s express request to have the National Guard deploy in New Orleans, Louisiana, or Washington, DC, a federal territory.

A Supreme Court order last week upholding a lower court’s decision to prevent the president from sending the National Guard to Chicago is among the president’s latest legal setbacks.

National Guard troops are typically stationed at the governors’ offices, unlike federal military members, at their request. The National Guard can only be unilaterally mobilized by presidents when other federal agents are unable to break the law.

Trump’s defense of similar deployments across the country was severely hampered by the administration’s majority of Supreme Court justices’ rulings that he has not yet met that threshold.

As part of their appeal of a lower court’s decision, Department of Justice attorneys in California withdrew a request to keep state troops under federal control earlier on Wednesday. According to US District Judge Charles Breyer, the troops must be returned to state control.

The Democrat and leading Trump critic, California Governor Gavin Newsom, stated in a post on X that “Trump and his occult cabinet members’ acceptance means this illegal intimidation tactic will finally come to an end.”

A more significant court decision on the subject is “looking forward” to Newsom and his staff.

Trump, for his part, stated in his Truth Social post that he would not be hesitant to send troops back.

US imposes more sanctions on tankers transporting Venezuelan oil

As part of President Donald Trump’s campaign to impose sanctions on Venezuela’s oil industry, the US Treasury Department has recently issued a new round of sanctions.

Four businesses and their associated oil tankers, who are alleged to be involved in Venezuelan oil transportation, are the targets of the sanctions announced on Wednesday.

Recommended Stories

list of 3 itemsend of list

Trump has disputed Nicolas Maduro’s claim that the Venezuelan leader is in charge of a ‘narco-terrorist’ government that seeks to destabilize the US, which is repeated in recent sanctions announcements.

The Treasury stated on Wednesday that “Maduro’s regime increasingly relies on a shadow fleet of international vessels to facilitate sanctionable activity, including sanctions evasion, and to generate revenue for its destabilizing operations.”

Venezuela’s main export is oil, but the Trump administration has attempted to obliterate its domestic markets.

The Nord Star, the Rosalind, the Valiant, and the Della are accused of helping Venezuela’s oil sector evade existing sanctions by providing financial resources to “Maduro’s illegitimate narco-terrorist regime” with the release of the allegations in the notice on Wednesday.

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent stated that “President Trump has made it clear that we will not allow the illegitimate Maduro regime to profit from oil exports while supplying the country with deadly drugs.”

The Treasury Department will continue to put pressure on Maduro’s regime under President Trump’s orders.

claims involving Venezuelan oil

A separate Venezuelan company that Washington claims assembled drones were created by Iran is now being subject to sanctions.

The Trump administration has cited a number of factors in recent months, including Maduro’s contested 2024 election and immigration.

Trump, for instance, has used the pressure campaign to stop the flow of illegal drugs, despite Venezuela exporting fentanyl essentially not the administration’s main drug.

Washington has also been accused of attempting to overthrow Maduro’s administration and take control of the nation’s vast oil reserves.

Trump’s statements that appear to have held control of Venezuela’s oil have fueled those suspicions.

Stephen Miller, Trump’s top adviser, claimed that the US “created the oil industry in Venezuela” the day after Trump declared a “total and complete blockade” of sanctioned oil tankers entering and leaving the country.

He suggested that Venezuela’s petroleum industry was robbed of it when it began to become a nationalist state in 1976.

After the election of socialist President Hugo Chavez in 1998, which relinquished state control over Venezuela’s oil industry, leading to the seizing of foreign assets in 2007, the process accelerated.

According to Miller, that “tyrannical expropriation” scheme was “the largest recorded theft of American wealth and property.”

Chevron, a significant US oil company, still has operations there.

Trump has echoed Miller’s claims, saying that the US “will not permit a Hostile Regime to take our Oil, Land, or any other Assets.”

He added that immediately all of those possessions “must be returned to the United States.”

Caribbean military expansion

The Trump administration has launched a number of military operations against tankers in recent months as it has focused more on Venezuela’s oil sector.

The Skipper, the administration’s first tanker, was seized on December 10; a second one was seized ten days later.

As it crosses the Atlantic Ocean, a third tanker reportedly has been on the lookout for US military personnel.

The US began dumping military assets in the Caribbean region along Venezuela’s coast, along with other military assets, several months prior to the attacks on the oil tankers.

In what rights groups refer to as extrajudicial killings, the US military has launched numerous bombing campaigns against alleged drug-smuggling boats in international waters in the Caribbean Sea and eastern Pacific since September 2.

The administration has not provided any legal justification for the attacks despite the death of more than 100 people.

Trump claimed that the US had hit a “dock area” in Venezuela that was being used to load the alleged drug boats, and that he had told reporters on Monday.

Trump has long threatened to start attacking targets on land, but the dock bombing is regarded as the first of its kind on Venezuelan soil.

Ivory Coast fight back against Gabon to top AFCON group ahead of Cameroon

What is behind the Saudi-UAE rupture in Yemen?

More than ten years ago, it all started. A coalition was formed to combat the Houthis, who had taken control of Yemen, using Saudi Arabia, the UAE, and the United Arab Emirates as its pillars.

That mission eventually failed. The UAE then partnered and provided funding for a group called the Southern Transitional Council (STC) in the south of Yemen in order to pursue its own long-term goals.

Recommended Stories

list of 3 itemsend of list

After the STC seized control of areas close to its borders, Riyadh intervened to counteract what it perceived as a threat to national security.

An ultimatum that the UAE agreed to was given 24 hours’ notice to withdraw.

What does all of this mean for Yemen’s future?

Presenter: James Bays

Guests:

Abdul-aziz Al Ghashian is a Gulf International Forum senior non-resident fellow.

Southern Transitional Council spokesman Alkharder Sulaiman