Indian police invoke ‘terror’ law as Modi alleges Delhi blast ‘conspiracy’

Indian police are investigating a deadly car explosion in New Delhi under an anti-terrorism law, officials have said, as Prime Minister Narendra Modi promised to apprehend those responsible for what he called a “conspiracy” behind the blast.

Police were still to give details on Tuesday on what caused the explosion near the Indian capital’s historic Red Fort, but officials said that the case had been registered under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, India’s main “anti-terrorism” law, giving investigators broader powers to detain suspects.

Recommended Stories

list of 4 itemsend of list

India’s “anti-terrorism” force, the National Investigation Agency, is leading the probe, the home affairs ministry said.

Monday’s explosion in a Hyundai i20 car has killed at least 12 people and injured 20, although there is some confusion over the exact number of dead due to the condition of the bodies of the dead after the blast.

The explosion, outside a busy metro station near one of India’s most iconic sites, was the first significant security incident since a shooting attack in April that left 26 dead in Pahalgam in Indian-administered Kashmir, sparking clashes with Pakistan.

“I assure everyone that the agencies will get to the bottom of the entire conspiracy,” Modi said, in a speech during a state visit to neighbouring Bhutan, without giving further details.

“All those involved will be brought to justice.”

Blast ‘shaken sense of security’ in India

Reporting from close to the site of the blast, journalist Ishan Garg said the explosion had “shaken the sense of security” of Indians in the capital and further afield.

“The blast has sent the entire nation into a state of alert,” Garg told Al Jazeera, as he stood in front of the cordoned-off site of the explosion near the historic Red Fort, where investigators are carrying out their work.

He said heavy security had been deployed in the heart of the Indian capital, while the city’s borders were also under tight scrutiny.

Officials in states including Rajasthan and Odisha said they were ramping up security in the wake of the blast.

Indian media outlets, citing police sources, reported that investigators believe the explosion may be linked to raids on a suspected “terror” cell and the seizure of a large cache of explosive material in the city of Faridabad hours before the blast.

Faridabad, an industrial district in the neighbouring Haryana state, lies just 30km (18 miles) from the area in Delhi where Monday’s blast took place.

Prior to the blast, a large cache of explosives was reportedly seized in Faridabad, while in Indian-administered Kashmir, two Kashmiri doctors were arrested, including one from Faridabad. The car involved in the explosion was linked to one of the arrested doctors, according to reports.

Citing police sources, the Press Trust of India news agency reported that police had traced the route of the vehicle involved in the explosion from Faridabad to New Delhi’s Red Fort, using CCTV footage and data from a toll plaza to map out its 11-hour route.

According to the agency, the vehicle was first seen outside Asian Hospital in Faridabad, before it was seen crossing a toll plaza and entering Delhi at 8:13am (02:43 GMT).

At 3:19pm (09:49 GMT), the car entered a parking area near the Red Fort, where it remained for nearly three hours.

US Senate votes to end shutdown: Why Democrats are upset with Chuck Schumer

Democratic Senate leader Chuck Schumer is facing mounting calls to step aside after seven Democrats broke ranks with the party to vote for a Republican-led proposal to end the government shutdown without receiving concessions.

The deal does not resolve extending healthcare subsidies under the Affordable Care Act (ACA), which was one of the main demands from the Democrats.

The progressive section of the Democratic Party has blamed Schumer for the passing of the bill in the Senate on Monday, ending the longest shutdown in the country’s history.

“He’s the leader of the Senate. This deal would never have happened if he had not blessed it. Don’t take my word for it. Take the word of other senators who are saying that they kept Senator Schumer in the loop the whole time,” Democratic Representative Ro Khanna told CBS News.

The measure approved by the Senate would fund parts of the government until January 30, but excludes ACA health insurance subsidies that benefit some 24 million Americans.

The Senate Republicans, however, have agreed to hold another vote in December to decide on the healthcare subsidies. But it is not guaranteed that the healthcare subsidies will be approved.

Which Democrats voted to end the shutdown?

In the Senate, Republicans hold 53 seats and Democrats have 47, but Republicans do not have the 60 votes needed to advance bills. Eight senators who caucus with the Democrats voted to move the Republican measure forward.

Democratic senators who voted for the motion to advance the bill included Dick Durbin of Illinois; Jeanne Shaheen and Maggie Hassan of New Hampshire; John Fetterman of Pennsylvania; Catherine Cortez Masto and Jacky Rosen of Nevada; and Tim Kaine of Virginia.

Independent Senator Angus King of Maine, who caucuses with the Democrats, also voted in favour of the measure.

Why are the Democrats calling out Schumer?

Schumer, 74, did not vote in favour of the measure on Monday, but he is being accused by the party leaders of allowing the centrist Democrats to strike a deal with the Senate Republicans.

In his Senate speech on Monday, Schumer raised the issue of healthcare, saying, “The American people will not forget Donald Trump’s cruelty and heartlessness over the past six weeks,” Schumer said.

But progressive Democrats have not absolved him for failing to stop the defections.

“Leadership is about changing and adapting when there is real need, and unless we hear that, we will fail to meet the moment,” Democratic Michigan Senator Elissa Slotkin said in a statement.

Representative Khanna wrote on X on Monday, “Schumer is no longer effective and should be replaced.”

In another interview with an online US politics show, Khanna slammed Schumer for his stance on Israel’s genocidal war on Gaza, as well as his support for the 2003 Iraq war.

“You’ve had Schumer cheerleading the Iraq War, cheerleading a blank cheque to [Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin] Netanyahu, betraying us on the first shutdown … and now he’s not even willing to fight!” he told the Breaking Points.

Khanna added that Schumer should be “replaced” and the only reason more Democrats are not calling for it is that it would “offend a lot of donors”.

“Are we gonna be beholden to the donors that have gotten us two terms of Donald Trump, or are we gonna listen to people?” he asked.

While Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (AOC) of New York did not explicitly call out Schumer, she wrote in an X post on Monday: “The average ACA benefit is up to $550 a person/mo. People want us to hold the line for a reason. This is not a matter of appealing to a base. It’s about people’s lives. Working people want leaders whose word means something.”

Congresswoman Rashida Tlaib said that “the Democratic Party needs leaders who fight and deliver for working people. Schumer should step down.”

“After 40 days of holding firm, with public opinion and momentum on our side, establishment Democrats decided to cave to Trump,” left-wing activist Saikat Chakrabarti, who is running for Congress to represent San Francisco, said. “Schumer and the entire democratic leadership need to step down — and if they run for re-election, we need to primary them.”

The Senate vote came days after democratic socialist Zohran Mamdani won the New York mayoral election on the Democratic Party ticket. Mamdani was not endorsed by a number of Democrats, including Schumer.

But House Democratic leader Hakeem Jeffries defended Schumer. “Leader Schumer and Senate Democrats over the last seven weeks have waged a valiant fight on behalf of the American people,” he said on Monday.

Since the beginning of the shutdown, Democratic senators voted 14 times not to reopen the government as they demanded the extension of the ACA tax credits.

Schumer also faced the ire of party leaders when he backed a deal to avert a shutdown in March without getting concessions on healthcare subsidies.

Congresswoman AOC, a member of the progressive wing of the party, had called the vote a “tremendous mistake”. “I think there is a deep sense of outrage and betrayal,” she had told reporters.

While Democrats saw success in the recent local elections, emerging rifts now highlight a widening gap between the establishment Democrats and progressive and left-wing Democrats.

Can Schumer be removed?

Schumer can be removed from his position as the Senate minority leader in internal Democratic leadership elections, which would be held after the November 2026 Senate elections. The 45 Democratic senators and two independents who caucus with Democrats get to vote on this.

Germany detains man accused of offering to pay people to kill politicians

German police have detained a suspect accused of running a darknet platform that called for prominent politicians to be murdered, according to prosecutors.

The suspect, a German-Polish dual citizen identified only as “Martin S.” in line with German privacy rules, was detained in the western city of Dortmund late on Monday, the Federal Prosecutor’s Office said in a statement. Public broadcaster ARD reported that he had ties to the far-right Reich Citizens movement, citing security sources.

Recommended Stories

list of 3 itemsend of list

He is suspected of “terrorism” financing, providing instructions for committing serious acts of violence endangering the state and dangerous dissemination of personal data.

Prosecutors allege that Martin S. had been calling for attacks on politicians, officials and other figures in German public life on the darknet – the name given to parts of the internet that can only be accessed using specialised software – since at least June. He is accused of anonymously running a platform on which he published lists of names, self-styled death sentences and instructions for building explosives.

Prosecutors did not address his motive or suggest he was working for a foreign actor.

Martin S. also allegedly called for donations in cryptocurrency that were intended to be offered as a reward for killing his targets. The platform contained sensitive personal data on potential victims, prosecutors said.

While authorities did not name any of the politicians or public figures Martin S. had targeted, Spiegel news magazine reported that former chancellors Angela Merkel and Olaf Scholz, as well as other former federal ministers, were on the list.

German politicians complain that they are increasingly subject to attacks, both verbal and physical, at a time of deepening polarisation.

There has also been a general increase in the scale of cyber threats to Germany and other Western countries.

Interior Minister Alexander Dobrindt, asked about the case at a previously scheduled news conference, said the investigation into a suspect trying to generate money to finance attacks against public figures via “a right-wing extremist platform” had been ongoing since June. He declined to give further details.

Federal prosecutors are responsible for significant extremism-related and national security cases in Germany.

Russians agree to quit Serbian oil company as US sanctions bite

Russian owners have agreed to sell their shares in Serbia’s Naftna Industrija Srbije (NIS) after the major oil and gas company was slapped with Western sanctions.

Russia’s state-controlled company Gazprom Neft owns a 44.9 percent stake in NIS, while an investment division of its parent company, Gazprom, holds 11.3 percent. The Serbian government retains a 29.9 percent share.

Recommended Stories

list of 3 itemsend of list

Serbian Energy Minister Dubravka Djedovic Handanovic announced on social media on Tuesday that the Russian companies had sent a request to the Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) of the United States Treasury to request the extension of a sanctions waiver based on negotiations with a third party.

“The petition states that the Russian side is ready to give up control and influence over the NIS company to a third party,” she said, adding that the Serbian state supported this request.

The minister said OFAC has already responded to some comments, and Serbia anticipates that it will know Washington’s position as early as this week.

“Time is running out and a solution has to be found, but the citizens must not suffer and run out of fuel. That won’t and shouldn’t happen,” Djedovic Handanovic wrote.

NIS is a major provider in the Serbian market, and the Balkan state is trying to ensure continued operations as winter approaches and the US and its European allies ramp up pressure on Russia to end its war with Ukraine.

The sanctions on NIS came into effect in early October, leading to banks processing the company’s payments and Croatia’s JANAF pipeline stopping its deliveries of crude oil.

Officials estimate that the refinery can only operate until November 25 without new crude supplies.

The broader package of US sanctions has also targeted Russia’s two largest oil companies, Lukoil and Rosneft, and dozens of their subsidiaries.

Lukoil has stakes in oil and gas projects in 11 countries, as well as refineries and petrol station networks across several European states.

In late October, Lukoil announced it is pursuing a swift sale of several overseas assets.

The company has said it is talking with potential buyers, and that transactions would be carried out under a sanctions grace period that runs until November 21. Lukoil said it would seek an extension if necessary to complete the fast-tracked transactions.