Daniel Levy steps down as Tottenham chairman after divisive 25-year tenure

On Thursday, the club announced that Daniel Levy would step down as chairman of Tottenham, a divisive figure who has been blamed for keeping the Premier League team profitable but unable to make it a trophy-winning force for nearly 25 years.

Levy, 63, announced his retirement from his position with Tottenham as a “global heavyweight competing at the highest level,” the longest-serving chairman in the Premier League.

Recommended Stories

list of 4 itemsend of list

Significant progress has been made, according to Levy, but it hasn’t always been an easy journey. I’ll be a strong advocate for this organization forever.

Levy’s departure comes a few months after Tottenham beat Manchester United 1-0 to reach the Europa League final, ending a 17-year trophy drought. Spurs won the English League Cup for the first time since then in 2008, and it was their first major success since 1984 when they won the UEFA Cup, the equivalent of the Europa League.

Many Tottenham fans also accused Levy of pursuing profits over silverware by failing to fully support some of the most well-known managers in football he has worked with in recent years, including Jose Mourinho and Antonio Conte, despite his reputation as a tenacious and uncompromising negotiator in the transfer market.

Despite the fact that Tottenham was one of the so-called “Big Six” in English football and had one of the best stadiums in world football, there were protests against his tenure last year, when the club finished 17th in the Premier League, one place above the bottom three.

Since moving from White Hart Lane to Tottenham Hotspur Stadium, where it has hosted concerts and other sporting events like the NFL and boxing, has Levy oversaw the transition.

In light of Levy’s departure, who reportedly owns roughly 30% of the club’s majority owner ENIC, Tottenham stated that there would be “no changes to the ownership or shareholder structure of the club.”

Why is the US military building up its presence in the Caribbean?

A Venezuelan boat that the Trump administration claimed was carrying drugs was recently targeted by the Trump administration.

This week, tensions between the US and Venezuela reached an end.

After Washington made the unprecedented choice to bomb a boat close to the Venezuelan coast, that is when.

Recommended Stories

list of 3 itemsend of list

The vessel was loaded with drugs and gang members, according to US President Donald Trump’s administration, and that they posed a threat to the US.

The president of Venezuela says his nation is prepared to defend itself while refuting the allegations. What’s the rationale behind this US behavior, then?

Is it politics or narcotics?

Presenter: Cyril Vanier

Guests:

Paul Dobson, a political analyst with Venezuelanalysis.com and a specialist on Venezuelanalysis.com relations,

Javier Farje – An analysis of Latin American affairs

Macron hopeful of US support to Kyiv’s security as 26 nations pledge troops

After 26 European nations pledged to send troops to Ukraine after the conflict is over, French President Emmanuel Macron has stated that there is “no doubt” that the US will support security efforts there.

Macron addressed the so-called coalition of the willing on Thursday at a meeting in Paris, followed by a video call to Donald Trump to demonstrate Washington’s commitment to Ukrainian security, which is viewed as crucial to any peacekeeping efforts.

Recommended Stories

list of 3 itemsend of list

The French president claimed that the US would announce its “reassurance force” “in the coming days” and that Washington would work with European nations to impose new sanctions if Russia continued to reject a three-and-a-half-year war.

Following mixed reviews from Trump’s special envoy Steve Witkoff and the president of Ukraine Volodymyr Zelenskyy, the summit in Paris was attended by European leaders.

Natacha Butler, a reporter from Paris, reported for Al Jazeera that Macron had stated that Trump had a “positive” conversation and that more information might be forthcoming about what the US might have to offer in terms of security guarantees.

That has been very vague indeed up until now, she said, citing Trump’s earlier statement that Ukraine would not receive US troops.

According to experts, any US operation would depend on the US’s ability to provide airstrikes and intelligence to nations outside of Ukraine.

“Crystal step”

The coalition of the willing’s 26 members, which include Canada, Australia, Japan, and Canada, are expected to provide increased training for the Ukrainian army and force deployment by some European nations.

Along with Zelenskyy, Macron and other leaders said, “We have today 26 countries who have formally committed to deploy as ‘reassurance force’ troops in Ukraine, or to be present on the ground, in the sea, or in the air.”

He stated that troops would not be “on the front line” and would “prevent any new major aggression.”

Zelensky applauded the decision, claiming that this was the first serious concrete step made today for the first time in a long time.

A Downing Street spokeswoman said that it was necessary to “go even further” to press Putin to end hostilities during the summit, according to United Kingdom Prime Minister Keir Starmer.

German Chancellor Friedrich Merz reaffirmed his concern for the scope of the involvement, but he also pressed for more pressure.

After the summit, a government spokesman said, “Germany will decide on military involvement at the appropriate time.”

Giorgia Meloni’s office, the country’s prime minister, stated that while Italy would not send troops to Ukraine, it could assist in the investigation of any potential peace agreements.

Peace talks stall.

Russia’s Vladimir Putin is currently showing no interest in a peace deal, with alarm rising after his well-known visit to Beijing this week. Countries met to discuss Ukraine’s security.

While Zelenskyy expressed “very pleased that things seemed to be moving forward,” Al Jazeera’s Butler claimed that Putin had no intention of bringing up any kind of peace negotiations.

Many viewed this as a call for capitulation, which Putin had previously stated he would be willing to meet with Zelenskyy in Moscow.

Trump, who hasn’t yet managed to broker talks between Zelenskyy and Putin, warned this week that if he was unhappy with Moscow’s next steps, he would “see things happen.”

In the absence of a peace deal that the Kremlin would approve, Putin has stated that Moscow is willing to “resolve all our military issues militarily.” Additionally, he has stated that he opposes the presence of European forces in post-war Ukraine.

NATO’s Mark Rutte responded, “It’s not up to them to decide.” “I believe we must stop making Putin too powerful,” he said.

Trump is “displeased” with his position.

Zelenskyy pointed the finger at Hungary and Slovakia specifically after the video call with Trump, saying that the US president was “very upset” that European nations were still buying Russian oil.

In 2022, the majority of Russian oil imports were prohibited by the European Union, but Slovakia and Hungary were made exceptions to this to give the landlocked central European nations time to find alternative oil sources.

Throughout the conflict, Ukraine has targeted the Russian Druzhba oil pipeline, which transports Russian oil to Hungary and Slovakia. The European Commission has been instructed by both countries to stop the attacks against Ukraine.

Trump “emphasised” that European nations must stop purchasing Russian oil, according to a White House official cited by Reuters, adding that the EU had already sold 1.1 billion euros ($1.28 billion) in fuel to Russia in a year.

The official added that the president also emphasized that European leaders must put economic pressure on China to fund Russia’s war efforts.

By January 1st, 2028, the European Commission has proposed legislation to stop imports of Russian oil and gas into the EU.

‘It’s a war’: Marco Rubio labels Ecuadorian cartels ‘foreign terrorists’

During a visit to Ecuador, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio referred to two additional Latin American cartels as “foreign terrorist organizations.”

The top US diplomat, Daniel Naboa, and Rubio met in Quito on Thursday after making the announcement.

Recommended Stories

list of 3 itemsend of list

Rubio described the designations as part of a “war” US President Donald Trump has begun to wage against Latin American cartels during a press conference after speaking with Ecuador’s foreign minister.

It’s a war, to be honest. A war is being waged against murderers. Rubio remarked that the world is fighting terror.

Two Ecuador-based gangs, Los Lobos and Los Choneros, both of whom have participated in the illicit drug trade, were the target of the new US “terrorism” designations.

Rubio asserted that the gangs had a history of violence and that they were more accountable for trafficking than trafficking. These are not drug dealers, they say. These are “narco terrorists” who terrorize their home countries.

Under President Trump, Rubio’s aggressive rhetoric highlights a shift toward labeling organized crime in Latin America as “terrorism.”

However, experts claim that Trump justified a military attack on a boat leaving Venezuela on Tuesday using that logic. 11 people allegedly belonging to the Tren de Aragua gang were killed extrajudicially as a result of the bombing.

Rubio did not respond to a question about whether the administration would seek congressional approval for such strikes in Ecuador during his visit, which many experts believe are against international law.

Rubio, however, stated that he did not anticipate the US carrying out such strikes against “cooperating countries.”

According to Rubio, “There is no need, because those governments will help us identify” alleged gang members. They will assist us in locating these individuals and destroying them. If that is what it requires.

He compared Venezuela to Venezuela under President Nicolas Maduro, whose government he called a “terrorist organization, an organized crime organization.”

For its part, the term “foreign terrorist organization” does not, by itself, give the US president more authority to launch unilateral military strikes against specific groups.

Rubio added that it “allows the US to go against the assets, properties, and monies of any person in the US or in the US banking system related to these groups.” He claimed that it also improves the ability of foreign governments to share intelligence.

Rubio and his counterpart, foreign minister Gabriela Sommerfeld, made announcements about increased security funding for Ecuador, improved migration cooperation, and the signing of a free trade agreement.

The new security commitments include $ 13 million for drones and $ 6 million for general security for the Ecuadorian Navy.

Noboa has expressed support for Rubio’s suggestion that he might also think about reestablishing a military base in Ecuador. However, a national referendum would be necessary to decide whether it would be approved.

According to Lucia Newman, a reporter for Al Jazeera’s Latin America program in Santiago, Chile, Rubio’s visit demonstrated that Ecuador and the US “are really on the same page when it comes to fighting organized crime and drug trafficking.”