Russia-Ukraine war: List of key events, day 1,371

On Wednesday, November 26, this is how things are going.

Fighting

  • Seven people were killed and 21 were hurt in the Russian attacks on Kiev, according to a post on Facebook on Tuesday from the state emergency service. At least 18 people were also removed from the rubble, according to officials.
  • Volodymyr Zelenskyy, the president of Ukraine, claimed that the missile and drone attacks on Kyiv and the surrounding areas had caused “extensive damage to residential buildings and civilian infrastructure.”
  • According to Russia’s TASS state news agency, Russian forces “massively strike” targeted military installations in Ukraine, including “defence industry facilities, energy facilities, and drone storage sites.”
  • At least nine people were hurt in a Ukrainian drone attack in the Krasnodar region of Russia, according to TASS, citing the regional task force.
  • About 40, 000 people in a region of Russia’s Zaporizhia region were without electricity as a result of a Ukrainian attack, according to Yevgeny Balitsky, a Moscow-installed official in the area, in a post on Telegram.
  • According to the Ukrainian battlefield analysis site DeepState, Russian forces have advanced in the east of Ukraine near the cities of Siversk and the towns of Novoselivka, Zatyshya, Novoekonomichne, and Myroliubivka.
  • According to TASS, Russian forces shot down four long-range missiles and 419 drones that Ukrainian forces launched in a 24-hour period, citing Russia’s Defense Ministry.

plan of peace

  • There are “only a few remaining points of disagreement,” according to Donald Trump, president of the United States.
  • Trump stated in a statement on his Truth Social platform that he had instructed his army secretary, Dan Driscoll, and special envoy Steve Witkoff to meet with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Moscow in order to “finalize this Peace Plan.”
  • Trump later said, “The deadline for me is when it’s over, and that’s when he backed down from his earlier deadline of Thursday for Ukraine to accept the US-backed peace plan.”
  • Andriy Yermak, the head of state for president Zelenskyy, later confirmed that he had spoken to Driscoll over the phone and that he was expecting him in Kyiv this week, adding: “We are ready to continue working as quickly as possible to finish the steps necessary to end the bloodshed.
  • Zelenskyy stated in his nightly address that “many things depend on the United States because it’s America’s strength that Russia takes most seriously,” and that he hopes to see “continued active cooperation with the American side and President Trump.”
  • As representatives from the US, Ukraine, and other European nations gathered in Geneva to continue discussions on ending the war, the most recent update on the peace talks was released.
  • Following the meeting, the United Kingdom, France, and Germany all declared in a joint statement that they had agreed for their militaries to begin “planning on security guarantees” and that “meaningful progress” had been made. They also reiterated that Ukraine’s sovereignty and long-term security should be preserved in any resolution to the conflict.
  • They also confirmed that Ukraine will receive long-term funding, including using frozen Russian assets to fund reconstruction.
  • Ihor Zhovkva, the deputy president of Ukraine, and Gert Jan Koopman, the European Commission’s director general, spoke about the progress being made in appointing a member of the EU. According to the proposed peace plan, NATO membership in the EU is still possible.

What are the risks of Afghanistan-Pakistan tensions escalating?

Despite peace efforts, both nations have more attacks.

A day after three Pakistani security personnel were killed in a bombing, Pakistan is accused of conducting airstrikes in Afghanistan that killed civilians.

Recent efforts to broker a truce and a temporary ceasefire failed.

What causes the violence and what dangers exist?

Imran Khan, the presenter

Guests:

Obaidullah Baheer is a visiting professor at the Afghan American University.

Sahar Khan, a security analyst with a focus on South Asia

Chelsea thump Barcelona in Champions League as Man City also lose

Barcelona and Manchester City both suffered significant losses in the Champions League on Tuesday as a result of defensive errors.

Chelsea moved into the top four with a comfortable 3-0 victory over 10-man Barcelona to win the third league game.

Recommended Stories

list of 4 itemsend of list

Barcelona lost a man just before half-time after defender Ronald Araujo received a second yellow card.

Jules Kounde scored an own-goal in the 27th, Estevao’s nice strike in the 55th, and Liam Delap’s close-range goal in the 73rd.

Estevao scores Chelsea’s second goal in the match against Barcelona [Hannah Mckay/Reuters]

Leverkusen continue to be a man city’s problem.

In Pep Guardiola’s 100th Champions League game as City manager, his team struggled to adjust to Bayer Leverkusen’s quick transitions, and Barcelona suffered a 3-0 loss to Chelsea with an own goal and a red card.

Erling Haaland was one of the 10 changes made to Guardiola’s starting lineup following Saturday’s Premier League defeat to Newcastle, but it didn’t have the desired impact.

In the 23rd, Alejandro Grimaldo fired a low shot into the far corner of Leverkusen, and Patrik Schick added a second in the 54th, which was Leverkusen’s first goal.

With a win, City could have climbed to the top of the table, but the top three remained unchanged throughout the night. On Wednesday, Arsenal, Inter Milan, and Bayern Munich all play.

Bayer Leverkusen's Patrik Schick celebrates scoring their second goal
Patrik Schick celebrates the second goal scored by Bayer Leverkusen [Lee Smith/Reuters]

Both Benfica and Napoli both have record wins.

Samuel Dahl’s opening goal helped Benfica defeat struggling Ajax 2-0, Mourinho’s first Champions League victory. The two winless teams met in the Netherlands at No 36 versus No 35 in the standings before the game.

After Ajax goalkeeper Vitezslav Jaros saved a header from Benfica’s veteran defender Nicolas Otamendi, left back Dahl unstoppable with a rebound. In the 90th, Leandro Barreiro added a second goal.

In all competitions, Ajax has lost five of its Champions League matches and only won one of its final ten games.

The only goal was scored by Canadian forward Promise David in the 1-0 victory over Galatasaray, a team that is without a full-back. Victor Osimhen, the Turkish side’s top scorer in the Champions League, was unhurt, and the Turkish side had 10 men on hand when Arda Unyay, 18, was shown two yellow cards.

Trump to send top envoy to Russia in push to finalise Ukraine plan

Russia says it supports a “essence” of a US strategy to end its conflict with Russia, as Donald Trump claimed that progress was being made toward reaching a deal and that he would send his special representative to Russia for talks with President Vladimir Putin.

After US and Ukrainian negotiators met in Geneva two days earlier to discuss Trump’s initial peace plan, which had been perceived by Ukrainians as a Russian wish list for Kyiv to cede territory to Moscow, impose its military, and renounce its commitment to NATO, diplomatic activity erupted on Tuesday.

Recommended Stories

list of 3 itemsend of list

The proposed proposal, which appears to address concerns of Ukraine and its allies in Europe, has since been modified.

President Volodymyr Zelenskyy addressed “sensitive points” at a video conference of the so-called coalition of the willing, a group of 30 countries supporting Ukraine.

A Ukrainian official earlier claimed Kyiv was “the framework’s essence” and that the official was backing it. Andriy Yermak, Zelenskyy’s chief of staff, who led the Geneva negotiations, added that the security guarantees Ukraine was seeking appeared “very solid” in response to that feeling of momentum.

Trump acknowledged at the White House that the Ukraine war was “not easy,” but he added that “we’re close to reaching a deal.”

He said, “I expected that to be a simpler [deal], but I believe we are progressing.”

Later, he stated on his Truth Social platform that he would send envoy Steve Witkoff to Moscow to resolve “a few” remaining issues with the agreement.

He stated that he would like to meet with Putin and Zelenskyy “soon,” but only when the deal to end the conflict is done, or at least in its final stages.

Russia appeared unconvinced of progress after firing a deadly barrage of missiles at Kiev’s capital the previous night.

The modified plan, which is still unpublished, should reflect the “spirit and letter” of an agreement reached between Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin at their Alaska summit earlier this year, according to Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov.

Lavrov warned that “if the spirit and letter of Anchorage are lost in comparison to the fundamental agreements we have established, then the situation [for Russia] will fundamentally change.”

According to Al Jazeera’s Yulia Shapovalova, who is a journalist from Moscow, there was a lot of “uncertainty” at the Kremlin despite alleged “behind-the-scenes interactions” between US counterpart Steve Witkoff and Russian envoy Kirill Dmitriev, who reportedly worked on Trump’s plan’s initial stage.

She claimed that the revisions to the peace plan did not make the Russian side happy.

The so-called European version, according to Shapovalova, allows Kyiv to join NATO and doesn’t restrict the size of its armed forces, in contrast to the 28-point initial American plan presented by Donald Trump, which included 28 points.

However, US Army Secretary Dan Driscoll had earlier expressed his satisfaction at a meeting with Russian officials in Abu Dhabi, the country’s capital, by stating that “the discussions are going well and we are still optimistic.”

There are “a few delicate, but not insurmountable, details that need to be resolved,” according to White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt, who spoke to X on X.

According to Kimberly Halkett, a reporter for Al Jazeera from Washington, DC, “it’s unclear when those discussions will take place, who will be involved, and what they will look like.” Given the upcoming November 27th American Thanksgiving holiday, she continued, it was obvious that they would not be coming soon.

Macron urges “pressure” on Putin.

Leaders of the coalition of the willing, who have pledged to guarantee any ceasefire, quickly adopted security guarantees and a reconstruction plan for Ukraine as the US struggled to close the stalemate between Ukraine and Russia.

The leaders of the US and coalition nations convened a task force to “solidify” security guarantees at the video meeting co-chaired by French President Emmanuel Macron and British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, Zelenskyy and US Secretary of State Marco Rubio in attendance.

Trump hasn’t stated whether he will provide support for Ukraine’s post-ceasefire “reassurance force.” Although the force’s formation would rely on US military muscle, the plan would involve European allies who would train Ukrainian troops and provide sea and air support.

Macron claimed in a statement following the video call that, contrary to what had been stated in the US plan’s initial draft, discussions in Geneva had established that there should be no limitations on the Ukrainian army.

A political and legal impasse in a Europe seeking funding for Ukraine’s reconstruction, according to him, will be “finalized in the coming days” with the European Commission.

There isn’t a consensus on how to proceed despite the fact that Western nations froze about $300 billion in Russian assets in 2022, primarily in Belgium. Some people support the asset’s seizing, but others, like Belgium, remain cautious due to legal concerns.

According to reports, Trump’s strategy would divide the assets between US-Russian investments and reconstruction.

Macron criticised Russia, arguing that Moscow should be subject to “continued pressure.” He made reference to Russia’s overnight attacks on Ukraine’s capital Kyiv, which resulted in seven fatalities and damaged the heating and power systems, saying “on the ground, the reality is quite the opposite of a willingness for peace.”

Trump administration to retroactively vet refugees already resettled in US

Immigrant rights organizations are concerned that the administration of US President Donald Trump will retroactively vet refugees who have already been admitted into the nation.

According to Tricia McLaughlin, a spokesman for the Department of Homeland Security, “Corrective action is now being taken to ensure those who are present in the United States deserve to be here.”

Recommended Stories

list of 3 itemsend of list

More than 230, 000 refugees who were formally resettled in the nation under former president Joe Biden were informed by the Associated Press and Reuters on Monday that they had received a government memo.

According to the memo, USCIS Director Joseph Edlow said that if a refugee is found to have violated the requirements for resettlement, their legal status will be revoked.

According to the memo, “USCIS has determined that a thorough examination and re-interview of all refugees admitted from January 20, 2021, to February 20, 2025” is appropriate.

“USCIS will also periodically review and re-interview refugees who have been admitted after this time frame.”

In 2024, the US admitted more than 100, 000 refugees. The Democratic Republic of the Congo, Afghanistan, Venezuela, and Syria were the main countries of refugee origin.

Refugees file for legal status while they are outside the country, in contrast to asylum seekers who seek protection once they enter the country.

They are permitted to enter the US under the presumption that they will remain fugitives in their home countries and protected from persecution.

A year after entering the country, newcomers can apply for legal permanent residency through refugee admission, which also provides a pathway to becoming US citizens.

Multiple stages of screening and interviews are conducted on applicants for refugee admission. The United Nations is frequently the first step in the process, which refers the applicant to the US refugee admissions program.

The applicants are then subject to a rigorous screening process by US immigration authorities, who must demonstrate that they faced persecution for their race, religion, nationality, political beliefs, or social affiliation.

The International Refugee Assistance Project (IRAP), which is led by Sharif Aly, claimed that refugees are the country’s most thoroughly screened immigrants.

Aly said in a statement that “this order is one more in a long line of efforts to bully some of our communities’ most vulnerable members,” “by threatening their legal status, making them vulnerable to the egregious conduct of immigration enforcement agencies, and placing them through a laborious and potentially re-traumatizing process.”

The Trump administration’s action was “unnecessary, cruel, and wasteful,” according to Mark Hetfield, president of the humanitarian organization HIAS. His organization assists newcomers to the US.

Hetfield told Reuters that “refugees have already been thoroughly checked out than any other group of immigrants.”

Trump drastically reduced refugee admission during his first term, but the program was completely eliminated once he returned to the White House in January.

The refugee admission cap for the following year was set at a historic low of 7,500 by the second Trump administration.

The president also gave the order to “primarily” resettle white South Africans, who he claims are subject to discrimination from their own government.

Colombian court sentences Alvaro Uribe’s brother to 28 years in prison

Santiago Uribe, the brother of former Colombian president Alvaro Uribe, was given a 28-year prison sentence and three-month prison term for aggravated homicide and conspiracy to commit a crime while leading a paramilitary group.

A three-judge panel in Antioquia’s northwestern province on Tuesday declared that Uribe “formed and led an illegal armed group” in the wake of the verdict.

Recommended Stories

list of 3 itemsend of list

Under Uribe’s leadership, the organization allegedly carried out a “plan to systematic murder and extermination people who were unfavorable.”

Uribe has denied having any connections to paramilitary organizations. His team of attorneys intends to file an appeal.

The lower court was cleared last year, but the decision was overturned. The Supreme Court of Colombia will now decide the case in its entirety.

The Uribe family’s alleged paramilitary ties are the latest twist in a long-running criminal investigation.

Alvaro Uribe, the former president, has also been the subject of an AP photo investigation.

During Colombia’s six-decade-long internal conflict, critics have accused Uribe and his brother, the former president, of maintaining ties to organizations that committed grave human rights violations.

Activities that occurred on and around the La Carolina cattle ranch owned by the Uribe family in Antioquia were the subject of Tuesday’s conviction.

The 12 Apostles, a far-right paramilitary group formed by ranchers in the early 1990s to combat leftist rebels, specifically the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC), were well-known in their 307-page ruling.

The 12 Apostles, which the court called a “death squad,” killed “undesirables” including sex workers, drug users, people with mental illnesses, and suspected leftist sympathisers, according to the court’s description of The 12 Apostles as a “death squad.”

According to the ruling, the paramilitary group held meetings at La Carolina as well as training and distribution of weapons on-site.

According to the judges, those were “acts that led to crimes against humanity.”

The court found Uribe responsible for ordering the murder of Camilo Barrientos, a bus driver who was fatally shot near La Carolina in 1994 for being a suspected rebel collaborator, and describing him as the leader of The 12 Apostles.

The militia “enjoyed the cooperation of agents of the State, both through action and inaction,” according to the ruling on Tuesday.

In the late 1990s, Uribe was first questioned about his involvement with The 12 Apostles, but the investigation was canceled in 1999 because there was no conclusive proof.

In 2010, Colombian authorities detained Uribe on suspicion of homicide, and they opened an investigation in 2016.

Alvaro Uribe speaks to reporting scrum
Santiago’s arrest was addressed by former president Alvaro Uribe at a press conference on March 6, 2016.

The lower court’s decision was announced years later, in November 2024, despite the trial’s conclusion coming out in 2020. Jaime Herrera Nino, the judge who was in charge of the case at the time, ruled that there was insufficient evidence and acquitted Uribe.

That conclusion is overturned by Tuesday’s decision. Even at the highest levels of power, human rights advocates applauded the ruling as a step toward accountability.

The sentence is very significant, according to Laura Bonilla, a Peace and Reconciliation Foundation (Pares) deputy director in Colombia. It illustrates the extent of paramilitarism’s influence on Colombian society.

The complexity of the case, according to Gerson Arias, a conflict and security investigator at the Colombian think tank Ideas for Peace, reflects the various power structures involved.

He claimed that because paramilitarism was deeply rooted in society’s upper echelons, it would take years to fully understand what transpired.

Therefore, it is likely that many of our collective paramilitarism-related knowledge is still awaiting clarification and discovery.

Former Colombian President Alvaro Uribe, the defendant’s brother, served there from 2002 to 2010.

The former president was found guilty earlier this year of paying former paramilitary officers to cover up his involvement with them.

Following a court’s ruling in October, the court overturned the evidence’s finding that it had been gathered through an unlawful wiretap. In the prosecution’s arguments, it also cited “structural deficiencies.”

In Colombia, the former president has pledged to form a coalition to oppose a left-wing government in the 2026 elections. He continues to be a powerful figure in right-wing politics.