Who are the Kurds?

Syria’s government announced on Sunday that it had reached a ceasefire agreement with the secular-led Kurdish Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF) as part of its effort to unite the nation following 14 years of bloody civil war. Under the agreement, the government will take over land held by the Kurdish armed group.

Despite this, Syria’s army and the SDF both reported on Monday night’s ongoing gun battles in the country, particularly around an ISIL (ISIS) prison.

What did the two parties agree on Sunday?

President Ahmed al-Sharaa said the Syrian Army would take control of three eastern and northeastern provinces – Raqqa, Deir Az Zor and Hasakah – from the SDF as part of the deal.

According to this agreement, an official from Syria’s defense ministry said government-affiliated forces had arrived on the outskirts of the city of Hasakah in the country’s northeast on Monday.

As part of a wider 14-point agreement, Syria’s defense and interior ministries are now incorporating the SDF.

Al-Sharaa’s government pledged to reunify Syria following the ousting of former President Bashar al-Assad in December 2024. A decree recognizing Kurdish as a “national language” and granting official recognition to the minority group was issued by al-Sharaa on Friday.

The end of the SDF is what Omar Abu Layla, a Syrian affairs analyst, told Al Jazeera.

The SDF in Syria represents the struggle of the Kurdish people, an ethnic group present across the Middle East.

The Kurds are who?

The Mesopotamian plains and nearby highlands, which are now home to southeastern Turkiye, northeastern Syria, northern Iraq, northwestern Iran, and southwestern Armenia, are home to a group of people called the Kurds. The Kurdish population is concentrated in these areas, which are collectively referred to as Kurdistan.

Kurds do not have a state of their own because they are spread across several different Middle Eastern nations. Additionally, they have a sizable diaspora population, with the majority in Germany and other European nations like France, the Netherlands, and Switzerland.

There are between 30 and 40 million Kurdish people around the globe. The Kurds are regarded as the world’s largest stateless ethnic group, having a shared culture and a strong Kurdish language.

The dialects of Kurdish, a language spoken in the northwest of Iran, are diverse and linguistically distinct. Most historians agree that Kurds constitute the Iranian branch of the Indo‑European peoples.

While the majority of Kurds adhere to Sunni Islam, there are also Kurdish communities that practice Christianity, Yazidism, and other faiths.

(Al Jazeera)

Why are the Kurds stateless?

When the Ottoman Empire seized the majority of Kurdish-held territory in the 1500s, the Kurds lost their land.

Post-World War I peace treaty, the Treaty of Sevres, established the Ottoman Empire in 1920.

Under this, the Allied powers proposed creating an autonomous Kurdistan. The emerging Kurdish nationalist movement saw this as a significant advance, but the treaty was never implemented. Later, Turkishye and the Allies renegotiated the post-war agreement, and the 1923 Lausanne Treaty completely rejected the notion of a self-governing Kurdistan.

Since then, Kurds have repeatedly tried to establish their own state, but those efforts have so far failed.

INTERACTIVE - Who are the main Kurdish groups SDF Syria KDP Iraq-1768819555
(Al Jazeera)

How do Kurdish grievances in Iraq, Syria, and Turkiye differ?

Kurds have endured years of difficult relations with their respective governments in each of the four countries.

Syria

Kurds make up about 10 percent of the population in Syria, according to the CIA World Factbook.

Repression and unfair treatment have been practiced against Syrian Kurds.

About 120 000 Kurds were denied Syrian citizenship in 1962 by a special census in al-Hasakah province. Their children and grandchildren remained stateless, and later estimates from early 2011 put the number of Kurds without citizenship at around 300, 000.

Arab communities have also been given access to Kurdish land as a result of Arabization policies.

When the uprising against al-Assad started in 2011 and turned into a civil war, the Kurds were initially at peace. However, in 2012, Syrian government troops pulled out of many Kurdish areas, and Kurdish groups took control.

ISIL (ISIS) fighters began attacking three Kurdish areas in northern Syria that were close to the organization’s territory in 2013. The Syrian Kurdish political party, the Democratic Union Party (PYD), fought them off with the Syrian Kurdish armed group People’s Protection Units (YPG). The YPG was backed by the Turkiye-based Kurdistan Workers ‘ Party (PKK).

Kobane, a Syrian Kurdish town, was taken over by ISIL in 2014. In early 2015, Kurdish forces led by the YPG and supported by American-led air strikes retake control of the town after months of intense fighting. Later that year, in October 2015, the YPG and allied Arab and other factions formally established the SDF as a broader coalition to fight ISIL across northern and eastern Syria.

The SDF pushed into Deir Az Zor, ISIL’s final major stronghold, before capturing Raqqa, the de facto capital of the SDF in Syria, in October 2017. Baghouz, the final piece of ISIL-held territory in Syria, was taken by the SDF by March 2019.

Al-Assad remained in power until he was ousted in December 2024 by Syrian opposition fighters led by al-Sharaa, who is now the interim president.

Al-Sharaa issued an official decree on Friday as part of his campaign to unite Syria that officially recognizes Kurdish as a “national language” alongside Arabic, enables its teaching in schools, and grants citizenship to all Kurdish Syrians. Additionally, the decree removes measures that were used to actively deport many Kurds from Syria in the Hasakah province census of 1962.

The decree officially recognises Kurdish identity as part of Syria’s national fabric for the first time and declares Newroz, the Kurdish New Year festival, a paid national holiday.

Additionally, it establishes penalties for “initiating to ethnic strife,” grants rights to Kurdish Syrians, and prohibits linguistic or racial discrimination.

The Syrian government’s north and northeast region’s Kurdish government said in a statement that the decree was “a first step, but it does not fulfill the aspirations and hopes of the Syrian people.” It called for more action.

It stated that “rights are not protected by temporary decrees, but rather by permanent constitutions that express the people’s and society’s goals.”

Turkiye

Kurds make up 19% of Turkiye’s population, but generations have seen their names and outfits be banned.

The Kurdistan Workers ‘ Party (PKK) was founded in 1978 by Abdullah Ocalan, with the aim of creating an independent Kurdish state in southeastern Turkiye. The group launched an armed rebellion against the Turkish government in 1984, attacking state institutions and security forces with guerrilla attacks.

Tens of thousands of people have been killed and many more have been displaced in Kurdish-majority areas as a result of the PKK-Turkish security forces’ subsequent conflict.

In the 1990s, the PKK rolled back its demands, instead seeking greater cultural recognition. It continued to use affiliated parties and organizations to advance its armed resistance against the Turkish state.

The Turkish-based PKK has ties to the SDF’s secular Kurdish leadership. Although the PKK signalled in early 2025 that it would lay down its arms and disband, it is still listed as a “terrorist” group by Turkiye, the European Union and the US. PKK fighters and Turkish forces continue to engage in violent clashes.

Despite this, the US supported the SDF because it was a successful partner in the fight against ISIL, which the SDF and a US-led coalition had already defeated in northeast Syria by 2019.

Iran

Kurdish people make up nearly 10 percent of Iran’s population.

The Islamic Republic of Iran was established in Iran as a result of the 1979 Islamic Revolution.

Kurdish forces in Tehran frequently clashed with the Persian-speaking, Shia Muslim government over Kurdish demands for political autonomy and cultural and linguistic rights, despite the Islamic Republic’s initial support for the Islamic Republic and briefly controlling parts of Iran.

Several Kurdish groups have long opposed the government in western Iran, where they form a majority, and there have been periods of active rebellion against government forces in those areas.

In Iran, violent uprisings in the 1980s and 1990s were severely suppressed. Important Kurdish parties were forced to leave their strongholds, and many of their fighters and leaders retreated across the border to bases in northern Iraq’s Kurdish region. Civilian communities were also forced into Iraq, although large Kurdish communities remained inside Iran.

As an armed conflict with Iran’s Islamic Republic, the Kurdistan Free Life Party (PKK) was established in 2004. Since then, it has been conducting guerrilla attacks and ambushes against Iranian security forces from positions along the Iranian-Iraq border.

Iraq

Kurdish people make up between 15 and 20 percent of the population in Iraq. They have historically enjoyed greater rights than the Kurds in neighboring countries, but they continue to face oppression in Iraq.

In 1946, Kurdish nationalist leader Mustafa Barzani established the Kurdistan Democratic Party (KDP) to fight for independence in Iraq. In 1961, he launched a full armed struggle in what is often referred to as the First Kurdish–Iraqi War or the September Revolution.

The conflict continued into the 1970s, with occasional clashes in Iraq’s northern provinces. The government then began settling Arabs on Kurdish soil and relocating Kurds in the late 1970s. Some of them – many Yazidis – settled in “Mujammaat” or army-controlled towns or settlements in northern Iraq.

A Kurdish uprising was led by Barzani’s son, Masoud Barzani of the KDP, and Jalal Talabani of the rival Patriotic Union of Kurdistan (PUK) in Iraq in 1991, the year Iraq lost the Gulf War. The administration of the time, led by Saddam Hussein, violently suffocated it. More than 1.5 million Iraqi Kurds fled to Turkiye to escape a crackdown by Hussein’s regime. In response, Turkey imposed its own borders. In northern Iraq, the United Nations established a “safe zone” for refugees in April 1991, killing thousands along the border. Eventually, most people returned to their homes in Iraq after the situation stabilised.

The Kurdistan National Assembly, the first democratically elected parliament in Iraq’s Kurdistan region, established the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) in 1992. The KRG took control of the now semi-autonomous Kurdish region in northern Iraq after the UN granted them protection in 1991.

While the KDP and PUK agreed to share power, they experienced rifts and at times engaged in armed fighting with each other between 1994 and 1998.

However, the two organizations worked together to defeat Hussein in 2003. Duhok, Erbil, and Sulaymaniyah were the three provinces that Masoud Barzani led the KRG controlled. In 2005, Talabani became Iraq’s first Kurdish president.

In the semi-autonomous Kurdish region and in disputed, Kurdish-claimed regions like Kirkuk, which is south of Erbil in northern Iraq, the KRG held an independence referendum in 2017. Baghdad rejected the poll as unlawful despite more than 90% of voters’ support for independence.

The Iraqi Supreme Court ruled that the referendum was contrary to the Iraqi Constitution, which calls for the preservation of Iraq’s unity and territorial integrity.

The Kurds lost significant oil revenues and attempted statehood were severely hampered by Iraqi forces’ subsequent invasion of Kirkuk and other disputed, dispersed regions.

In Iran, the US-Israeli addiction to hybrid warfare is on full display

The United States must avoid going to war because it is likely to cause an increase in nuclear proliferation in the nuclear age. Instead, it engages in hybrid wars.

Venezuela and Iran have recently experienced two instances of these conflicts. Both were waged through relentless misinformation campaigns, targeted military strikes, cyberwarfare, and crushing economic sanctions. Both CIA long-term projects have recently become more significant. Both incidents will cause chaos even more.

The US’s long-standing strategy toward Venezuela has two goals: to control its vast Orinoco Belt oil reserves and to overthrow its leftist government, which has existed since 1999. The CIA helped to fund a coup attempt against Venezuela in 2002, which is when America’s hybrid war with Venezuela began. When that failed, the US began implementing additional hybrid measures, including sanctions on Venezuela, the seizure of its dollar reserves, and measures to halt Venezuela’s oil production, which eventually failed. The US sown chaos, but the hybrid war did not end the government.

The US president has now launched an unprecedented attack, bombing Caracas, kidnapping President Nicolas Maduro, stealing Venezuelan oil shipments, and putting up a naval blockade, which is obviously a war action. Additionally, it seems likely that Trump is benefiting powerful pro-Zionist campaign donors who want to seize Venezuelan oil assets.

Since Venezuela has long supported the Palestinian cause and maintained close ties with Iran, Zionist interests are also interested in toppling the government. The US attack on Venezuela has been praised by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu as the “perfect operation.”

Israel and the United States are both waging a hybrid war against Iran at the same time. We can anticipate targeted assassinations, airstrikes, and US and Israeli subversion. Venezuela’s conflict with Iran can quickly turn into a devastating regional conflict, even a global one. US allies in the region have been making concerted diplomatic efforts to persuade Trump to back down and avoid military action, particularly in the Gulf nations.

Iran’s history is even more extensive than Venezuela’s. The country’s first US intervention dates to 1953, when Mohammad Mossadegh, a democratically elected prime minister, nationalized Iranian oil in opposition to the Anglo-Persian Oil Company (BP) in 1953.

Through a combination of propaganda, street violence, and political interference, the CIA and MI6 plotted Operation Ajax to take Mossadegh to power. They assisted the shah in regaining control of the country after Mohammed Reza Pahlavi fled the country because he was afraid of Mossadegh. The CIA also supported the shah by helping to establish his infamous secret police, SAVAK, which fought dissent through censorship, imprisonment, and torture.

In 1979, Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini was swept into power by a revolution that eventually resulted from this repression. After the US admitted the shah for medical care, students in Tehran seized him during the revolution, which sparked the US’s desire to try to hold him in place. Iran’s and US relations were further harmed by the hostage crisis.

The US has then plotted to oppress Iran and overthrow its government. In addition to funding Iraq in the 1980s to fight Iran, which ended in tens of thousands of deaths without achieving a majority, the US has engaged in numerous hybrid operations.

A negotiated resolution that would normalize Israel’s position in the world while limiting its nuclear program is the opposite of the US-Israeli goal toward Iran. Iran should be kept economically broken, diplomatically cornered, and subject to internal pressure in order to maintain its stability. Trump has repeatedly stifled talks that might have brought peace, starting with his withdrawal from the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), a 2016 agreement that had banned Iran’s nuclear energy activities and lifted its economic sanctions.

Understanding the hybrid war strategies helps to explain why Trump’s rhetoric abruptly oscillates between false peace promises and threats of war. Hybrid warfare is a land of contradictions, ambiguities, and pure deceit.

The US supported Israel’s bombing of Iran two days prior to the start of negotiations with Iran last summer, but the US was scheduled to hold talks with Iran on June 15. De-escalation in recent days should not be taken literally, for this reason. A direct military attack can only be too readily followed by one of them.

Venezuela and Iran as examples of how dependent on hybrid warfare are Israel and the US. For decades, the CIA, Mossad, allies’ military contractors, and security organizations have been the cause of conflict in Latin America and the Middle East by acting together.

They have ruined the lives of hundreds of millions of people, hampered economic growth, stifled terrorism, and caused a large wave of refugees. Beyond the chaos itself, they have nothing to support their billion-dollar investments in covert and overt operations.

There is only suffering, no peace, no stable pro-US or pro-Israel alliance, and no security. The US is also going to great lengths to discredit the UN Charter, which it first adopted after World War II. Hybrid warfare is prohibited from using force against other countries, as is made clear by the UN Charter.

The military-tech industrial complex in the US and Israel is just one example of how hybrid war benefits. In his 1961 farewell address, US President Dwight Eisenhower made a warning about the serious threat to society that the military-industrial complex poses. Due to the fact that it is now fueled by mass propaganda, artificial intelligence, and a careless US foreign policy, his warning has come even stronger than he had anticipated.

The best chance for the world is for the other 191 UN nations to finally reject their dependence on regime-changing operations, unilateral sanctions, dollar-based weapons, and UN Charter repudiation.

The American people have a hard time making their opposition heard despite the fact that they do not support the lawlessness of their own government. The US’s deep state brutality must end before it’s too late, according to them and almost everyone else.

Yemen faces worst food crisis since 2022, aid group warns

The International Rescue Committee (IRC) predicts that Yemen, one of the most impoverished countries in the world, will experience worsening hunger in the first half of 2026.

An additional one million people are thought to be at risk of life-threatening hunger, according to new projections released on Monday under the Integrated Food Security Phase Classification hunger-monitoring system. Additionally, Yemen’s most recent internal conflict comes at a time when regional actors from outside the country are engaged in conflict there.

Recommended Stories

list of 3 itemsend of list

The country’s worst outlook since 2022 is also predicted for areas of famine that will affect more than 40, 000 people in four districts over the next two months, according to the assessment.

Access to basic health and nutrition services has been hampered by years of conflict and widespread displacement.

These pressures now intersect with a national economic collapse that has increased food prices and reduced household purchasing power. Humanitarian aid has also drastically decreased.

Life-saving nutrition programs received less than 10% of the funding, according to the IRC, compared to Yemen’s required humanitarian response by the end of 2025, which is the lowest level in a decade.

The organization called for urgent action to stop the rapid deterioration, which is being caused by catastrophic humanitarian funding cuts, climate shocks, economic collapse, and recent insecurity, in a statement.

The IRC’s country director in Yemen, Caroline Sekyewa, called the rate of the decline alarming.

Yemenis are recalled as having no idea where their next meal would come from. We’re going to have to go back to this gloomy chapter, I worry. She said that the current deterioration is distinguished by its speed and trajectory.

She spoke of families forced to make desperate decisions. According to Sekyewa, “Food insecurity in Yemen is no longer a looming risk; it is a daily reality that forces parents to make difficult choices,” while some parents have taken to collecting wild plants to feed their children.

Sekyewa claimed the crisis can be avoided despite the dire situation. She urged immediate action from donors and cited cash as one of the best ways to assist families in meeting their basic needs with dignity and reaffirmed that “Yemen’s food security crisis is not inevitable.”

In response to renewed political and security tensions, the humanitarian warning is issued.

Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates, two of the Gulf’s closest allies, have recently been at odds with Yemen.

The Southern Transitional Council, backed by the UAE, advanced close to the Saudi border in December, before Saudi-backed forces seized a significant portion of Yemen.

Trump asks Putin to join Gaza ‘board of peace’ even as Ukraine war rages

Vladimir Putin has been invited to the “board of peace” of Donald Trump, which purportedly oversees governance and reconstruction in Gaza and oversees international conflicts.

The invitation was extended as a result of Russia’s nearly four-year conflict with Ukraine and the elusive signing of a peace deal there. Trump had been urging a resolution to the war, which he claimed would end a year before taking office. Peace negotiations are undergoing, but the pace has slowed once more as a result of a war of attrition that has been occurring on the ground.

Recommended Stories

list of 3 itemsend of list

The White House has reached out to individuals from all over the world to join the “board of peace,” which is led by Trump himself.

According to Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov, “President Putin has also been invited to join this board of peace.”

Without specifying whether Putin would like to join, he claimed that Russia was attempting to “clarify all the nuances” of the deal with Washington.

Trump reportedly invited Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko, a friend of Putin, to the organization.

Moscow has long tried to strike a balance between its relations with Israel and the Palestinians, one of the main players in the Middle East.

Putin has resisted Israel’s forcible occupation of Gaza and its subsequent invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, strengthening ties with its allies, including Iran.

In response to growing Western isolation, Moscow has also pressed for closer ties with the Gulf Arab states.

Trump’s efforts to resolve conflicts have previously been praised by Putin.

In October, Putin stated, “He really is doing a lot to resolve these complex crises, which have persisted for years or even decades.”

Putin said in reference to the Middle East situation, “If we succeed in accomplishing everything Donald has aspired to, it will be a historic event.”

Moscow’s traditionally friendly relations with Israel, which has a large Russian-born population, have been strained by the assault on Ukraine and the Gaza war.

Israel’s occupation of Gaza has been repeatedly criticized by the Kremlin, and restraint has been demanded.

At a meeting with President of the Palestinian Authority Mahmoud Abbas in May, Putin was quoted as saying, “The Gaza Strip is experiencing a humanitarian catastrophe in the full sense of the word.

The Russian president continued, “Russia is attempting to provide regular assistance to the Palestinian people.”

A three-tier governing body, including those from the US, Europe, and Arab nations, is expected to implement Trump’s 20-point plan to end Israel’s war on Gaza.

Inter Milan vs Arsenal: UEFA Champions League – team news, start, lineups

Who: Inter Milan vs Arsenal
What: Matchday 7 (of 8), league phase, UEFA Champions League
Where: San Siro in Milan, Italy
When: Tuesday, January 20, at 9pm (20:00 GMT)
How to follow: We’ll have all the build-up on Al Jazeera Sport from 17:00 GMT in advance of our text commentary stream.

Arsenal, now the only unbeaten team in the UEFA Champions League (UCL), travel to northern Italy to take on the might of Inter Milan on Tuesday after a 40-day break in the tournament schedule.

Recommended Stories

list of 4 itemsend of list

Riding a perfect 18 points from six matches so far, the Gunners enter this Matchday 7 contest as the UCL frontrunners, but their English Premier League (EPL) form has been far from dominant in 2026, drawing with 17th-placed Nottingham Forest in their most recent domestic fixture on Saturday.

Inter, who co-led the league phase with Arsenal after four rounds, enter this penultimate group stage contest riding a two-match UCL losing streak, including a crushing 1-0 home defeat to Liverpool in their last match on December 9, dropping the Nerazzurri to sixth in the standings.

Al Jazeera Sport takes a closer look at the high-stakes encounter, which might decide automatic qualification entry into the last 16.

Arsenal lead UCL and EPL, but it doesn’t feel like it

The Gunners lead next-best Bayern Munich in the Champions League by three points and front-run Manchester City in the Premier League by seven points, but they are playing far from their best in the new year.

Mikel Arteta’s side have sputtered out of the gate in 2026 with their last EPL victory an unconvincing 3-2 against Bournemouth on January 3, followed by two goalless draws: at home to Liverpool on January 8; and away to lowly Forest on January 17.

It is the first time since the 2012-13 season that Arsenal have recorded back-to-back 0-0 draws in the domestic league, with Arteta conceding that it was “difficult to generate momentum” during the most recent game.

“We came here to win the game, that’s clear, and we needed the opportunities that we had,” he said after the Nottingham setback.

“We haven’t managed that, so the word is disappointment.”

Arsenal remain well on course to end a 22-year wait to win the Premier League title, but they will need to quickly rediscover their offensive touch against a defensive juggernaut like Inter.

Jurrien Timber’s Arsenal have not scored a goal in the Premier League since January 3 [File: Peter Cziborra/Action Images via Reuters]

Inter hitting peak form

In contrast, Inter have recovered from a slow start to the Serie A season – where they lost two of their first three fixtures – to rapidly climb to the top of the ladder, three points clear of next-best AC Milan, and six points ahead of reigning champions Napoli.

The Nerazzurri are unbeaten in their last 11 domestic league fixtures. They were last defeated in Serie A way back on November 23, a 1-0 home loss in the derby match against Milan.

Will Arsenal qualify for the round of 16 if they beat Inter?

Yes. An Arsenal victory, or even a draw, in Tuesday’s penultimate League phase match against Inter would guarantee the North London outfit finish in the top eight clubs that automatically qualify for the last 16 of the tournament, thereby skipping the two-legged knockout playoff involving those placing ninth to 24th.

When did Inter and Liverpool last win the Champions League?

Arsenal have never won the UEFA Champions League title. They came closest in the 2005-06 season, losing the final to Barcelona 2-1.

Inter last won in 2010, overcoming Bayern Munich 2-0 in the final to complete the treble, a feat never achieved before by any team from either Italy or Germany.

What happened the last time Inter played Arsenal?

Inter defeated Arsenal 1-0 at the San Siro in a Matchday 4, league phase fixture on November 6, 2024.

Turkish midfielder Hakan Calhanoglu scored what turned out to be the match-winner from the penalty spot just before half time.

The two storied clubs have played three times in Champions League history, with Inter holding a 2-1 edge over the Gunners.

Hakan Calhanoglu in action.
Hakan Calhanoglu scores the match-winning goal for Inter Milan against Arsenal in their last Champions League encounter on November 6, 2024, at the San Siro Stadium, Milan, Italy [Claudia Greco/Reuters]

Inter Milan’s team news

In anticipation of Tuesday’s blockbuster clash against Arsenal, Inter coach Cristian Chivu rested stars Alessandro Bastoni and Marcus Thuram in Saturday’s 1-0 win at Udinese.

Thuram will re-enter the starting XI at the expense of Pio Esposito and will lead the line with regular strike partner Lautaro Martinez in Chivu’s well-tested 3-5-2 formation.

The Nerazzurri will likely be without key contributors Hakan Calhanoglu and Denzel Dumfries, both of whom are recovering from leg injuries and are close to a return to match action.

With a top-eight automatic qualification spot into the UCL round of 16 on the line, Chivu is expected to field his strongest possible side against Arsenal.

Inter Milan’s predicted starting lineup (3-5-2):

Sommer (goalkeeper); Acerbi, Akanji, Bastoni; Henrique, Barella, Mkhitaryan, Zielinski, Dimarco; Thuram, Martinez

Marcus Thuram in action.
Star striker Marcus Thuram will be available and is expected to start for Inter against Arsenal on Tuesday [Alberto Gandolfo/BSR Agency via Getty Images]

Arsenal’s team news

In a desperate effort to find some goal scoring, Arteta is tipped to start Bukayo Saka – who was brought on as a second-half substitute in Saturday’s draw with Forest – alongside Noni Madueke and Gabriel Jesus.

Arsenal will continue to be without the injured trio of Max Dowman, Piero Hincapie and Riccardo Calafiori, all of whom are not expected back until the first week of February, at the earliest.

Arsenal’s predicted starting lineup (4-3-3):

Raya (goalkeeper), Lewis-Skelly, Saliba, Magalhaes; Timber, Zubimendi, Rice; Odegaard; Madueke, Jesus, Saka

Last five matches

Inter Milan: W-W-D-W-W (most recent result last, Serie A matches only)

Arsenal: W-W-W-D-D (most recent result last, Premier League matches only)

Bukayo Saka in action.
Arsenal forward Bukayo Saka may start against Inter as Arteta searches for consistent goal-scoring options in 2026 [File: Peter Cziborra/Action Images via Reuters]