US wants to sell GM soya and corn to India, farmers wary

Indore, India: Madhya Pradesh, a soya bean farmer in the state of central India, has been disappointed by the state’s recently finished harvesting season.

The 57-year-old, who has more than 3 hectares (7.4 acres) of fertile land, claimed that excessive rain had caused his standing crops to be severely harmed the state’s soybean production.

Recommended Stories

list of 4 itemsend of list

According to Patel, “the production is only about 9, 000 kg,” or one-fifth of what it should be.

As a result of the excessive rain, corn prices, which are grown close to soya beans, have fallen.

Farmers like Patel should be concerned about more pressing issues.

One of the main components of the ongoing trade negotiations between India and the United States is that the two agricultural products are extensively grown for both livestock and human consumption.

President Donald Trump has so far imposed tariffs on India, which have threatened to destroy several US-based industries that are heavily exporting.

The US’s access to India’s agricultural sector is one of the issues in trade negotiations. Washington wants to see the introduction of genetically modified (GM) corn and soybeans on New Delhi’s market.

In order to introduce novel traits that increase production in comparison to conventional breeding, the GM technology involves changing plant DNA.

After Brazil, the US produces 119.05 million metric tons of soya beans, accounting for 28 percent of the world’s production.

Prior to the trade war with Beijing, China was the largest buyer of US soya beans.

Because China, the organization’s former top buyer, has dramatically reduced its purchases, Suman Sahai, the founder of Gene Campaign, a nonprofit working for farmers, said the US desperately needs a market for its soya beans and corn.

Trump must sell this crop of soybeans and corn to avoid piqueing the attention of his large-scale political base, she said.

[Gurvinder Singh/Al Jazeera] Soya farmer Mahesh Patel claims heavy rains destroyed his crop.

India’s resistance to change

India has so far stopped the importation of GM-variety soya beans and corn because it produces non-GM, organic crops that have a global niche market and could be hampered by the perception that GM varieties are causing the strain to become too diluted.

Madhya Pradesh alone produces more than half of the world’s 13.05 million tonnes of soya beans.

About 42 million tons of corn are produced in India, making about 80% of fuel-grade ethanol. Because of the lack of a processing facility for edible oil, the nation produces only corn on its own, but it imports soya oil for cooking purposes.

However, soya and corn farmers complain that traders are already charging less than the government’s recommended price. Additionally, the high prices of fertilizers, seeds, and other farm items are added to this, along with the unpredictable rainfall that has destroyed crops.

Because the government does not purchase from us, the traders can set the prices at their will. In Madhya Pradesh, corn farmer Prakash Patel, 50, said, “We are unable to even recover the production costs.”

We still have to pay the loans we used to purchase our farming equipment because the profit is a far-off dream.

Farmers worry that if US goods enter the Indian market, these losses will get worse.

In 0.40 hectares (1 acre) of land, a farmer in India typically produces about 1 metric tonne of soya beans. However, the same land area can support GM soybean production, according to Nirbhay Singh, a soya farmer in the state’s Piploda village.

Hemant Jain, an exporter of corn, is concerned about the impact of US goods entering India.

Because of their non-GM quality, Jain claimed that India’s soybean and corn products are in high demand internationally.

The import of GM products “would raise questions about adulteration in the minds of foreigners, who might be reluctant to purchase from us.”

Soybean India
According to experts, Indian growers cannot compete with US farmers who have sizable plots of land and substantial government subsidies.

Farmers in India, according to independent agrarian analyst Indra Shekhar Singh, have average landholdings of about 2 hectares (5 acres), where five to seven family members work and depend for food and income. They frequently have to work as laborers on other people’s land to earn more money.

This contrasts favorably with the US, where farmers have extensive fields to cultivate crops and, depending on the crop, receive substantial government subsidies.

Indian farmers can’t compete with the US government’s subordinated agri-commodities, saying that the US is trying to find a market alternative to China. Our farmers would be left deeply ill and helpless by them by the time they would have the entire market, Singh predicted.

Strong lobbying at work

However, some scientists and industry experts believe that India’s GM soybean and corn production has advantages.

Because they are not permitted to speak to the media, a senior scientist working with the Indian government on GM technology claimed that the introduction of the technology would allow farmers to use specific herbicides to control weeds without harming the crop.

The use of spraying insecticides and lower costs for farmers would be reduced thanks to the GM technology’s insect-resistant properties. Additionally, the GM method, which aids farmers in reducing their losses, significantly increases production.

According to Kawaljeet Bhatia, a 52-year-old Indian poultry feed supplier, the production of corn and soya beans will increase significantly with the introduction of GM varieties, which would benefit farmers and local businesses that are involved in the production process.

He suggested, however, that the government instead import GM seeds, producing their own.

“Some exporters, who claim to export organic products, pay a premium.” Because it benefits them, they want that status to continue. We only need to switch to GM in order to increase productivity, according to Bhatia.

Political analysts told Al Jazeera that the Indian government is being cautious. Agriculture accounts for 46% of the country’s GDP and contributes to it.

Sibaji Pratim Basu, an independent political commentator in Kolkata, West Bengal, quoted as saying, “The government is acting with caution, taking lessons from the massive farmers’ protest that had rocked the country in 2020-21. … referring to the yearlong protests by tens of thousands of farmers in northern India against three farm laws that the government has introduced. Only after the government withdrew those regulations did the protests come to an end.

Mexican Navy plane crashes off US coast, killing five

Russia-Ukraine war: List of key events, day 1,398

Trump unveils ‘Trump-class’ battleships for US Navy’s ‘Golden Fleet’

Donald Trump, president of the United States, announced plans to construct a new “Trump-class” of battleships, which he claimed would be bigger, faster, and 100 times more powerful than any other warships that had been built in the United States.

Trump stated at his Mar-a-Lago resort in Florida on Monday that the battleships would be a part of a larger plan to establish a “Golden Fleet” that would aid in maintaining US naval dominance.

Recommended Stories

list of 3 itemsend of list

The US president made the announcement while seated next to a rendering of the new ships, which appeared to have his emblazoned logo on them.

“We had large battleships,” he said. These are larger. There has never been anything like these ships, according to Trump, and they’ll have 100 times the force and power of the old ships.

He added that the ships would be “cutting edge” and equipped with the most recent technology, such as directed energy lasers and artificial intelligence. Additionally, they will have rail guns, nuclear cruise missiles, and hypersonic missiles, all of which the US Navy is working on at various stages.

He said, “Each of these will be the largest battleship in the history of our country, the largest battleship in the history of the world.”

Trump downplayed the notion that the new ships were intended to “counter any” allies, claiming that they were “a counter to everyone.”

Production would begin with two ships, according to the US president, but it could increase to 10, and to 25 over an undisclosed amount of time.

Trump claimed that the first ship would be named the USS Defiant and that “immediate work would begin” on the first two ships.

The new Trump-class warship is described as a spiritual successor to the battleships of the 20th century by both Trump and Navy Secretary John Phelan, but historically the term has only been used to refer to a very specific type of ship: a large, heavily armored, armed vessel designed to attack other ships or targets ashore.

The Iowa-class, the largest of the US battleships, was a sizeable 60 000 ton during World War II, when this type of ship gained notoriety. However, due to the rapid decline in the use of aircraft carriers and long-range missiles in contemporary fleets after World War II.

Trump made references to the documentary about naval warfare during the Second World War and the Great White Fleet, which was commissioned by former US President Theodore Roosevelt in the early 20th century.

“Victory at Sea,” . Victory at Sea was a classic, he said, adding that the new ships would “maintain American military supremacy”.

This new “guided missile battleship” is expected to be roughly the same size as battleships from the Iowa-class, but it will have much smaller crews, between 650 and 850 sailors, and be about the same size as those from the newly developed Golden Fleet website.

Its main weaponry will be missiles, not large naval guns, either.

Trump claimed that the naval expansion would coincide with renewed pressure on defense contractors to reduce costs and speed up production.

He stated that he will meet with major defense companies the following week to discuss delays and overruns and to assess whether executive compensation, stock buybacks, and dividends are preventing production targets.

‘We have to have it’: Trump renews push for Greenland as Denmark protests

Trump warns Maduro not to ‘play tough’ as Russia, China back Venezuela

As Washington intensifies its pressure campaign, which has received sharp rebukes from Russia and China, President Donald Trump has issued a new warning to Venezuelan leader Nicolas Maduro. He said “it would be smart” for the Venezuelan leader to step down.

After four months of mounting pressure on Caracas, Trump made the suggestion that he was prepared to further escalate the conflict with his Mar-a-Lago resort in Florida on Monday. He was accompanied by Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth.

Recommended Stories

list of 4 itemsend of list

When asked if the goal was to remove Maduro from office, Trump responded, “Well, I think it probably would… That’s up to him what he wants to do.” I believe that his actions would be wise. However, we’ll learn more.

The US leader continued, “If he wants to do something, if he plays tough, it’ll be the last time he can play tough.”

Trump threatened to retaliate by chasing a third oil tanker, which the US Coast Guard described as a “dark fleet” used by Venezuela to avoid US sanctions, for a second day.

Trump said, “It’s moving along, and we’ll eventually get it.”

The coastguard has seized nearly 4 million barrels of Venezuelan oil so far, and the US president also promised to keep the two ships.

“Maybe we’ll sell it,” he said. We might keep it, perhaps. He said, “We might use it in the strategic reserves.” We continue to do so. We also keep the ships in tact.

Maduro responds with a rip.

Venezuela’s crucial oil sector is the target of a significant US military deployment whose stated goal is to combat drug trafficking, as well as more than 20 strikes on suspected drug traffickers in the Pacific Ocean and Caribbean Sea, both of which are carried out close to the South American nation.

More than 100 people have been killed in the attacks, which have raised questions of their legality.

Venezuela denies involvement in drug trafficking and asserts that Washington wants to seize Maduro’s largest oil reserves in the world.

The US’s vessel seizures have been labeled as “international piracy,” according to Caracas.

In a speech aired on public television hours after Trump’s most recent speech, Maduro claimed that if he focused on his own nation’s problems rather than threaten Caracas, he would be better served.

If he took care of his country’s affairs, Mauro claimed, “He would be better off in his own country on economic and social issues, and he would be better off in the world.”

A UN Security Council meeting on Tuesday to address the growing crisis was the subject of the escalating rhetoric.

In a telephone call with Venezuela’s counterpart Yvan Gil, the country’s foreign minister Sergei Lavrov expressed “deep concern” about Washington’s Caribbean operations and the potential impact of regional stability and international shipping.

In the current circumstances, Moscow “reaffirmed its full support for and solidarity with the Venezuelan leadership and people,” according to a statement from the Russian foreign ministry.

US embargo on the country

China also criticized the US’s most recent actions as a “grave violation of international law.”

Beijing “opposes any actions that violate the objectives and principles of the United Nations Charter and infringe on the sovereignty and security of other countries,” according to Lin Jian, a spokesperson for the Chinese Foreign Ministry.

“Venezuela has the right to grow independently and work with other countries in a way that benefits both.” China agrees with Venezuela’s position regarding the protection of its fundamental rights and interests, he continued.

Rubio had earlier rejected Caracas’s support last week.

He claimed that because “they have their hands full in Ukraine,” Washington was “not worried about an escalation with Russia with regard to Venezuela.”

Trump has expressed frustration with Moscow over the lack of a resolution to the Ukraine war, which has caused US-Russian relations to deteriorate recently.

Gil, the Venezuelan foreign minister, meanwhile read a letter on state television, signed by Maduro and addressed to UN member nations, warning that the US embargo on the country would disrupt global oil and energy supplies.

Venezuela “reaffirms its vocation for peace,” he said, adding that it is “ready to defend its sovereignty, territorial integrity, and resources in accordance with international law.”