Sri Lanka landslides, floods death toll rises to 56, offices, schools shut

Trump suspends immigration from ‘Third World’, orders review of green cards

The day after an Afghan national was named as a suspect in the shooting of two National Guard members in Washington, DC, President Trump announced he would “select all Third World countries” and announced that he would “select all Third World countries.”

In the wake of the Washington, DC, shooting, Trump earlier ordered the US government to re-examine all green card applications from 19 “countries of concern.” As a result, Trump’s announcement is the latest in a line of escalating immigration restrictions.

Recommended Stories

list of 4 itemsend of list

Trump stated in a post on his Truth Social platform on Thursday that he would “permanently pause migration from all Third World countries to allow the US system to fully recover” and that he would “terminate all of the millions of Biden illegal admissions.”

Although he did not define the term “Third World,” it frequently refers to developing nations in the Global South.

Trump added that he would “remove anyone who is incapable of loving our country or who is not a net asset to the United States.”

He added that “noncitizens” would no longer be eligible for federal benefits or subsidies, and he would “denaturalize migrants who violate domestic tranquillity and deport any foreign national who poses a public charge, security risk, or is incompatible with Western civilization.”

Joseph Edlow, director of US Citizenship and Immigration Services, earlier on Thursday, claimed that President Trump had mandated “a full, thorough re-examination of every green card for every alien from every country of concern.”

The American people will not have to bear the cost of the previous administration’s careless resettlement policies, according to Edlow, who emphasized that the protection of this nation and the American people is still important.

Although Edlow did not specify which nations’ applications would be reviewed, his office directed The Associated Press (AP) news agency to a presidential proclamation that barted out of US citizens from 19 nations. Afghanistan, Haiti, Iran, Myanmar, Venezuela, and Yemen are included on the list.

In response to Citizenship and Immigration Services’ earlier statement, the agency decided to “update security and vetting procedures” and suspend all Afghan immigration requests indefinitely.

As the US attorney for the District of Columbia in Washington, DC, Jeanine Pirro, a 29-year-old Afghan national who previously worked with US forces in Afghanistan, identified the suspect in the shooting of the National Guard members as Rahmanaullah Lakanwal.

Following the US’s withdrawal from Afghanistan in 2021, Lakanwal reportedly arrived in the US through a program called “Operation Allies Welcome.” She claimed that federal authorities, including the FBI, would be scrutinizing his past and current immigration procedures.

The Trump administration has already aggressively restraining immigration into the US. The country announced in October that it would only accept 7,500 refugees by 2026, the lowest number since 1980.

According to a memo Edlow signed and obtained by the AP on Monday, the US government is currently conducting a thorough review of recent US refugee arrivals.

According to the AP, the memo directs the review of the roughly 200 000 refugees who have been granted asylum in the US through President Joe Biden’s administration.

Israeli incursion in Damascus countryside kills 9 Syrians: State media

According to state media reports that several Israeli soldiers were injured in clashes while another incursion by Israel into Syrian territory, including 12 children, was being carried out in the Damascus countryside.

Two children were among the victims of the Israeli dawn raid and strikes, which forced hundreds of families to flee Beit Jinn to nearby, safer locales, according to Syrian state media on Friday.

Recommended Stories

list of 3 itemsend of list

Israeli drones continue to hover over the area, according to the report.

The Israeli military continues to target any movement, according to the Syrian Civil Defense, and their teams were unable to enter Beit Jinn to help the injured.

Since Israel’s occupation of southern Syria expanded after President Bashar al-Assad was ousted in December 2024, its military incursions have become more brutal, more frequent, and more violent.

Local sources also confirmed to Al Jazeera on Friday that Israeli missile and artillery strikes on Beit Jinn resulted in the deaths of several Syrians and their injuries.

Following the incursion, there were verbal altercations between the residents and the occupying Israeli force.

The Israeli military claimed that three of its soldiers had been seriously injured in an exchange of fire, according to a statement posted on X.

According to reports, an Israeli force that had entered the Syrian village of Beit Jinn was surrounded, prompting air strikes and artillery shelling to expel it and compel its retreat, according to Israeli news outlet Yedioth Ahronoth. Numerous Syrians were killed and others were injured as a result of this.

After an Israeli force entered the town, an Israeli military helicopter exchanged fire.

Israeli bombings, kidnappings, and incursions in Syria

In the Golan Heights and Damascus countryside governorates, the Israeli army frequently launches ground incursions into Syrian territory.

Since Israel expanded its occupation of southern Syria in December 2024, Israeli military incursions have become more brutal, more frequent, and violent.

Following the 1967 conflict, Israel seized control of the Syrian Golan Heights and has held it ever since. However, Israel violated a 1974 agreement by occupying more land along the border as a “buffer zone,” including the strategically important summit of Jabal al-Sheikh, and then again invaded its neighbor’s territory.

Prior to the fall of al-Assad, a ally of its regional adversary Iran, Israel was already bombing Syria. However, Israel has increased its bombing activity and increased the number of strikes this year, including those in Damascus, which has resulted in the deaths of several Syrian soldiers and hitting the Ministry of Defense, as opposed to trying to take a new direction with Syria.

Damascus was in anger after Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu appeared with Israeli troops in an illegally occupied area of southern Syria earlier this month, which added to the uncertainty surrounding a security deal that could be reached.

Despite receiving support from the United States, Netanyahu’s visit signaled that he is not intending to change from his hardline position on Syria.

The Israeli military has established checkpoints, patrols, and even gates across Quneitra province. Some are abducted, while others are stopped and searched by police.

Syrian authorities and human rights organizations refer to these incidents as abductions or unlawful arrests, as they are described by Israel as security operations. In recent weeks, up to 40 people have reportedly been detained.

Firefighting at Hong Kong blaze ends with deaths over 90, dozens missing

Why is Senegal squaring up to the International Monetary Fund?

Senegal and the International Monetary Fund are at odds over a bailout that it urgently needs to close its public finances. While the IMF wants the West African nation to undertake a painful restructuring before it will agree to a bailout, Senegal, which was recently downgraded to deep within “junk bond” status, is resisting this plan.

Senegal was reduced by credit rating agency S&amp, P earlier this month, citing the country’s fragile government finances. Senegal’s public finances remain precarious, especially in the absence of a comprehensive official support program, according to S&amp, P on November 14.

Recommended Stories

list of 4 itemsend of list

After the government discovered $7 billion in borrowing that the previous administration had concealed, the IMF suspended a $1.8 billion funding package for Senegal last year.

Negotiations between Dakar and the IMF for a new bailout package are continuing as they hammer out what the government must do to restore public finances. However, so far, neither party has been able to reach an agreement.

How much public debt does Senegal have?

In its latest rating review, S&amp, P estimated Senegal’s public debt had risen to $42.1bn, or 119 percent of gross domestic product (GDP), at the end of 2024, making it one of the most indebted countries in Africa. About 9% of GDP was made up of state-owned enterprises (SOEs) owed debt, which was excluded from that figure.

Senegal has relied heavily on borrowing to pay for infrastructure projects since 2008. But during the COVID-19 crisis and subsequent jump in global interest rates, which made debt more expensive, costs soared as income fell. Senegal’s fiscal strains increased significantly in turn.

The government is now attempting to reduce its fiscal deficit, which is the percentage of public spending that exceeds the government’s budget, from 26% of GDP in 2024 to 5.4 percent by 2027, while reducing it to just 3 percent.

But S&amp, P’s outlook is far less rosy. The organization projects a fiscal deficit of 8% of GDP in 2027 and 8% of GDP in the next year. In this context, S&amp, P projects a 123 percent debt-to-GDP ratio as the ratio will increase over the coming year before gradually decreasing in 2027.

What has led to the current impasse with the IMF?

Bassirou Diomaye Faye won Senegal’s presidential election in March 2024. He ran in place of Ousmane Sonko, a disqualified opposition figure who had been barred from office because of a libel case involving the then-tourism minister. But after the vote, Sonko became Faye’s prime minister.

The new Pastef party government mandated an audit of the nation’s public finances in September 2024. The previous administration, led by President Macky Sall, significantly understated the public debt’s current status, according to Senegal’s court of auditors.

The court estimated that Senegal’s real debt-to-GDP ratio was closer to 100 percent, compared with the roughly 70 percent which had earlier been reported, revealing almost $7bn in undisclosed borrowing, which largely stemmed from not including the liabilities of SOEs.

The Sall administration’s “conscious decision,” according to the IMF, was used to conceal Senegal’s true debt burden. The IMF then terminated its $ 1.8 billion loan agreement with Senegal, which it had approved in 2023.

IMF loan packages are typically paid over in tranches. The IMF had already disbursed $ 700 million of the total by the time it abruptly ended the Senegal program. The executive board of the IMF must now decide whether to keep the arrangement going. If its review goes against Dakar, the board could ask the government to repay the disbursed funds.

The IMF may choose to continue funding the program and announce the next installment of the funding package if the review is favorable.

For context, Senegal’s deficit from 2024 is roughly half the size of the IMF’s $1.8 billion loan. The upshot is that it would provide essential funds for public spending. Without it, Senegal will have a significant funding problem.

On March 24, 2024, Senegalese opposition leader Ousmane Sonko supports presidential candidate Bassirou Diomaye Faye.

Why hasn’t the IMF reached a decision about this yet?

The IMF mission chief for Senegal, Edward Gemayel, said, “We’re engaged and determined to move as quickly as possible to help. ” Following a two-week visit to the West African nation, the IMF mission chief said on November 6.

In order to reduce its debt, Prime Minister Sonko revealed that Gemayel’s team had urged Senegal to undergo a restructuring, which would involve replacing old debt with new debt with longer maturities, lower interest rates, or a reduced debt stock. But these arrangements generally lead to reduced public spending and slower growth.

Countries that default on their debts typically struggle because they are forced to cut spending to stabilize their finances, leaving less money for investment and public services. Investor confidence also tends to decline, making borrowing from governments more expensive and difficult.

At a meeting of Pastef officials on November 8, Sonko, who has considerable influence over economic policy, said he had rejected the IMF’s proposal to restructure Senegal’s debt. However, Dakar now has few options for closing the nation’s fiscal gap as a result of his decision to reject the IMF’s plan.

The prime minister will need to present a credible fiscal plan that restores Senegal’s finances without resorting to a debt restructuring in order to persuade the Washington-based IMF to release its paused loan.

But Gemayel has already cautioned that the government’s 2026 budget is “very ambitious”, citing large tax increases. He declared, “We’ve never seen this before.” They must therefore be cautious.

What has the impact of this been on Senegal’s economy?

Investors were irritated by Sonko’s decision to reject the IMF’s restructuring plan. Senegal’s 2031-dollar bonds dropped by 4% on Monday, November 10 for the first trading day following Sonko’s cabinet meeting. Elsewhere, its notes due in 2048 fell by 2.4 cents to $60.30.

According to Leeuwner Esterhuysen, an analyst for Africa at Oxford Economics, “the markets reacted to the IMF’s request for a restructuring,” “the bonds dropped.” There is no indication of any imminent IMF funding, despite the fact that there is obviously a high level of debt distress.

“It seems the Fund is making a new loan contingent on Dakar accepting a restructuring”, Esterhuysen told Al Jazeera. The government is “playing ball,” he said, “for the time being, it will only prolong the impasse.”

In addition to the market’s concern, the cost of credit-default swaps, or default insurance, nearly doubled in the days leading up to November 12 from 750 to 1,120 basis points, or 3.7 percentage points.

During a speech at a rally in Dakar on November 11, Sonko insisted, “Senegal is a proud nation. We won’t be treated like a state that has failed. Better to accept a debt restructuring than to accept tax revenue?

Since 2020, Zambia, Ghana, Ethiopia, and Chad have all been forced to restructure their debt. However, other African governments are unappealing because of the lengthy and laborious process and accompanying economic hardship.

Instead of opting for expensive trade-offs last year, Kenya, another debt-strapped nation, went for tax increases and subsidy cuts. The measures were aimed at reducing Kenya’s budget deficit. They also sparked vicious demonstrations, which highlighted the political risks of austerity.

Faye Sonko
On March 20, 2024, a billboard for Senegalese presidential candidate Bassirou Diomaye Faye, supported by Ousmane Sonko, was displayed in Dakar, Senegal.

How has this affected the political situation in Senegal?

Sonko opposes an IMF-backed restructuring because “he doesn’t want to undermine his 2024 election campaign pledge to restore Senegal’s sovereignty,” according to Paul Melly, a consulting fellow on the Africa program at Chatham House.

Sonko is currently battling “tensions” between himself and President Faye, according to Melly. Earlier this month, it emerged that Sonko’s party rejected Faye’s attempt to lead a revamped coalition, a move viewed as an effort to consolidate power.

Sonko is regarded as a key power broker, frequently deciding policy on his own terms, despite serving under Faye and &nbsp. According to Melly, “Sonko was never going to be a subordinate prime minister.”

As such, Senegal’s fiscal position represents a major political challenge for Sonko. He may need to impose unpopular spending cuts to stay ahead of debt repayments, but he still wants to assert his “sovereignty” position.

What other options does Senegal have for resolving its debt problem?

In recent weeks, the government has introduced new levies on tobacco, alcohol, gambling and widely used mobile money transfers. In addition, it has made internal efforts to reduce spending by trying to reduce travel expenses and car purchases.

It’s difficult to strike a balance, Melly said. &nbsp, “Expectations remain high even as the economic challenges are huge”.

Putin says he is ready to guarantee in writing no Russian attack on Europe

Vladimir Putin, president of Russia, has dismissed claims that Moscow plans to invade another country as “lie” and “complete nonsense,” saying that he is ready to guarantee in writing that Russia will not attack another European nation.

Putin criticized Russia’s claims that it is planning an attack on Europe as “ridiculous” during a summit of the Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO), a Russia-led military alliance that includes some former Soviet republics, in Bishkek, the capital of Kyrgyzstan.

Recommended Stories

list of 3 itemsend of list

We never intended to do that, in fact. However, we’ll document it if they want to hear it from us. No denying that, according to the Russian president.

European leaders are skeptical of Putin’s claims that Moscow is planning a second invasion because he has repeatedly denied that Russia will invade Ukraine before starting one in February 2022.

Putin expressed optimism about a draft draft United States-backed peace plan, which he said could serve as the “basis for future agreements.” In response to questions about efforts to end the conflict in Ukraine.

Putin also expressed his readiness for a “serious” discussion to end the conflict, but he also reaffirmed that Moscow was ready to advance if necessary and to occupy more of Ukraine.

He reaffirmed that a major prerequisite for the end of the fighting was that Ukrainian troops leave areas in the Donbass region of eastern Ukraine, including those that Russian troops currently control, before resuming operations.

The Ukrainian troops must leave the regions they currently control before fighting will end. We will use military force to stop them if they don’t pull back, he said.

A Russian assault on its capital, Kyiv, would be opened up by a withdrawal, according to Ukraine.

The president has “lost his legitimate status,” the statement read.

Putin also made the claim that he was open to a settlement with Kyiv, but once more attacked Volodymyr Zelenskyy’s government as illegitimate and said signing any agreements with them was “legally impossible.”

We ultimately, of course, want to reach an agreement with Ukraine, largely speaking. However, as of right now, this is essentially a possibility, Putin said, reiterating unfounded claims that Zelenskyy’s presidential term had expired in May 2024 and that Kyiv had lost control of the country.

The Ukrainian government “made a fundamental strategic error” by cramming presidential elections, adding that since then, the president has lost his rightful place in the world, according to Putin.

Kyiv has argued that it is unable to hold elections while under martial law and protecting its borders from Russian attacks. A resolution granting Zelenskyy’s legitimacy to remain in office was overwhelmingly approved by Ukrainian lawmakers in February.

Putin added that any peace agreement must be accepted by the international community because of the Zelenskyy government’s alleged illegitimacy, as well as Russian gains in Ukraine.

Andriy Yermak, the president’s top official, reiterated on Thursday that Zelenskyy “will not sign away territory.”

No one should bet on Zelenskyy’s presidency as long as they are in office, Yermak told US magazine The Atlantic.

A 28-point peace plan for Ukraine was released last week by the US, and it was widely accepted by Russia. It demanded that Kyiv make significant concessions, including ceding territory and abandoning its NATO ambitions.

Ukrainian First Deputy Foreign Minister Sergiy Kyslytsya reported that the plan has since been modified with Ukrainian input, with the removal of the 600, 000-member Ukrainian army cap and general war crimes amnesty.

According to Zelenskyy, Ukrainian delegations are scheduled to meet with Washington officials on Thursday to work out a strategy for peace and security guarantees for Kyiv that was discussed at previous Geneva discussions.

He stated that there would be more discussions the following week without providing specifics.

Next week, Steve Witkoff, Trump’s special envoy, will travel to Moscow to continue discussions on crucial issues, including security guarantees for Europe and Ukraine.

Putin stated that his country intends to bring up its own “key issue” with the US delegation, particularly a passage in the peace plan that states that Moscow only intends to recognize Russia’s de facto control of Crimea and other Ukrainian territory.