Trump orders blacklisting Muslim Brotherhood branches as ‘terrorist’ groups

In response to their alleged support for the Palestinian group Hamas, US President Donald Trump has ordered his aides to launch a search for “terrorist” organizations in Egypt, Lebanon, and Jordan.

Trump signed the decree on Monday as Washington continued to impose sanctions on Israel’s allies in the region.

Recommended Stories

list of 3 itemsend of list

In the decree, Muslim Brotherhood leaders in Jordan were accused of supporting Hamas and the Lebanese branch of the organization by offering “material support” to Hamas and Hezbollah in their conflict with Israel.

During Israel’s conflict with Gaza, it was also claimed that a member of the Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood “called for violent attacks against American partners and interests.” However, it wasn’t immediately clear what the White House was talking about. In Egypt, the Muslim Brotherhood has been outlawed and largely driven underground.

The White House stated that “President Trump is confronting the Muslim Brotherhood’s transnational network,” which contributes to US-sponsored terrorism and destabilization efforts.

The secretary of state and the secretary of state are required to consult with the US intelligence chief within 30 days and prepare a report on the appointment in Trump’s order.

Within 45 days of the report, the Muslim Brotherhood branches would be officially labeled as “foreign terrorist organizations.”

The designation may be made sooner, but the procedure is typically formal. Additionally, the decree allows for the blacklisting of additional Muslim Brotherhood branches.

The White House is also pushing for the designation of the organizations as “designated global terrorists.”

It would be unlawful to give the group material support as a result of the designations. Additionally, it would primarily prevent their current and former members from entering the US and would stifle their revenue sources due to economic sanctions.

a steadfast need for right-wing activists

The Muslim Brotherhood, which was founded in 1928 by the scholar Hassan al-Banna from Egypt, has branches in the Middle East through political parties and social organizations.

Muslim Brotherhood-affiliated parties claim to be committed to peaceful political participation in elections across the Middle East.

However, several nations in the area have outlawed the group.

Right-wing activists in the US have long demanded that right-wing activists blacklist the Muslim Brotherhood.

However, critics claim that the move will increase authoritarianism and the Middle East’s stricter restrictions on free political expression.

On the basis of allegations of ties to the Muslim Brotherhood or contributions to organizations connected to the organization, the decree could also be used to target activists in Muslim America.

With false accusations of having ties to the Muslim Brotherhood, right-wing organizations have long advocated for the overthrow of Muslim American organizations.

The designation shouldn’t have an impact on Muslim American organizations and organizations, according to Nihad Awad, executive director of the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR).

Awad told Al Jazeera, “The American Muslim organizations are strong. They have a US presence, they claim. Millions of people are served by the relief organizations abroad. I’m hoping that their work is not affected by this.

He noted that anti-Muslim activists have been attempting to “prove the myth that every US Muslim organization serves as a front for the Muslim Brotherhood.”

The Muslim Brotherhood and CAIR were recently referred to as “foreign terrorist organizations and transnational criminal organizations” by Republican Texas Governor Greg Abbott.

Israel kills four Palestinians as attacks continue despite Gaza ceasefire

Despite the ceasefire, Israeli forces continued to fire on neighborhoods across Gaza, killing at least four Palestinians, and injuring several more, according to hospital officials who spoke to Al Jazeera.

A Palestinian man was killed on Monday in Bani Suheila, east of Khan Younis, in an area that extends beyond the so-called “yellow line,” the Israeli military-imposed boundary that Israel uses to mark areas under its military control.

Recommended Stories

list of 3 itemsend of list

Israeli attacks continued throughout the day, according to Al Jazeera’s ground-based teams, with reports of air raids, artillery, and helicopter strikes in both northern and southern Gaza.

Israeli fire raged near the yellow line in Beit Lahiya. Northeast of Rafah and the Khan Younis borderline were targeted by tanks and helicopters in the south.

According to Al Jazeera’s Tareq Abu Azzoum, a journalist from Gaza City, “extensive Israeli attacks beyond the yellow line have caused Gaza’s eastern neighbourhoods to be systematically destroyed.”

He continued, “A systematic attempt to destroy Gaza’s neighbourhoods and create buffer zones, making these areas completely uninhabitable, which complicates a return for families.”

According to the Palestinian Wafa news agency, civil defense teams working with police and the Red Cross recovered the bodies of eight members of a single family from the rubble of their camp in central Gaza, which was damaged by an earlier Israeli attack.

Palestinian man stands among the remnants of destroyed buildings in Gaza City.

More than 9,500 Palestinians are still missing beneath the ruins of bombed-out districts, according to the Gaza Government Media Office, who reported that the number of bodies recovered since the ceasefire had now reached 582.

Meanwhile, Hamas’s armed wing announced that the Israeli prisoner’s body had been recovered from the Nuseirat camp in central Gaza.

In the first phase of the ceasefire agreement, two captives’ bodies must still be recovered. Hassan said efforts to locate the remaining bodies have been hampered by the widespread destruction.

The GHF, a US-backed organization that operated in parallel with UN aid organizations, announced on Monday that its activities in Gaza were over.

The organization cited provisions from the ceasefire from October as the cause of its withdrawal.

Since May 2025, according to UN experts, at least 859 Palestinians have died in the vicinity of GHF distribution points, with Israeli forces and foreign contractors frequently opening fire on crowds desperate for food.

The scheme’s failure to use established humanitarian channels was widely condemned.

Israeli attacks on the West Bank

Israeli forces increased their raids overnight across the occupied West Bank, arresting at least 16 Palestinians, according to Wafa. In Iktaba near Tulkarem, in Tuqu southeast of Bethlehem, in Kobar near Ramallah, and in Silat al-Harithiya west of Jenin, arrests were reported.

Residents of Tubas and the surrounding areas were also taken into custody by Israeli troops.

Baraa Khairi Ali Maali, a 20-year-old law student, was killed by Israeli forces in Deir Jarir, north of Ramallah, on Sunday night, in a violent incident.

According to Wafa, Israeli settlers attacked Palestinian homes on the village’s outskirts, sparking altercations. The village’s head of the community, Fathi Hamdan, claimed soldiers stormed the area to appease the settlers before firing on Palestinians who were confronting them.

Mourners pray next to the body of one of two Palestinians killed by Israeli fire in Khan Younis in the southern Gaza Strip, November 24, 2025. [Ramadan Abed/Reuters]
In Khan Younis, in the southern Gaza Strip, mourners chant “Ramadan Abed/Reuters” next to the body of one of the two Palestinians killed by Israeli fire.

Maali passed away shortly after arriving at the hospital from a gunshot wound to the chest. His murder comes after settlers fatally shot another young man in Deir Jarir earlier this month.

In another West Bank raid, Israeli soldiers injured two Palestinian women and detained two brothers in Kafr Qaddum, east of Qalqilya.

Settler attacks continued, too. Between Atara and Birzeit, north of Ramallah, fires erupted on agricultural land, destroying farmland owned by residents.

In a separate incident, locals from a newly established outpost threw out farming equipment and torched olive trees in Atara.

Since October 7, 2023, at least 1, 081 Palestinians have been killed in the occupied West Bank by Israeli forces and settlers, including 223 children, in addition to more than 10, 614 were hurt, and more than 20, 500 have been detained. In addition, more than 10, 614 have been injured, and more than 20, 500 have been detained.

Israeli violations of the Lebanon ceasefire

Hezbollah held a funeral for senior commander Haytham Ali Tabatabai, who was killed by Israel on Sunday in Lebanon.

Hezbollah flags lined the streets as mourners carried his coffin, wrapped in yellow and green, from Beirut’s southern suburbs. The organization has not yet made its response known.

The killing was described as “yet another ceasefire violation” by Mahmoud Qmati, the vice president of Hezbollah’s political council, while denying that Israel had “given the green light” to escalate the conflict.

Hezbollah is weighing its options carefully, according to security analyst Ali Rizk, who noted that it is unlikely to “give Netanyahu an excuse to launch an all-out war against Lebanon,” which he claimed could be more devastating than the current limited exchanges.

Hezbollah fighters raise their group's flags and chant slogans as they attend the funeral procession of Hezbollah's chief of staff, Haytham Tabtabai, and two other Hezbollah members who were killed in Sunday's Israeli airstrike, in a southern suburb of Beirut, Lebanon, Monday, November 24, 2025. [Hussein Malla/AP]
As they attend the funeral procession of Haytham Ali Tabatabai, the head of Hezbollah’s top of the line, and two other Hezbollah members who were killed in the Israeli airstrike in a southern Beirut on Sunday, Hezbollah fighters raise their group’s flags and chant slogans.

According to geopolitical analyst Joe Macaron, the US is no longer “restraining Israel” but is supporting Israeli operations in Syria, Gaza, and Lebanon.

Hezbollah is confronted by Al Jazeera’s Zeina Khodr, who reported from Beirut. Retaliation could face a significant Israeli assault, but inaction could erode its deterrence, according to Zeina Khodr, who reports from Beirut.

Any Hezbollah response, according to Imad Salamey of the Lebanese American University, could result in “severe” Israeli responses.

He added that the right-wing Israeli government is “eager to escalate because escalation will serve that government staying in power.”

Everton beat Man Utd despite Gueye seeing red for slapping teammate

Everton won their first Premier League game against Manchester United in almost 12 years after Idrissa Gueye was sent off for slapping his own teammate Michael Keane.

The visitors won 1-0 thanks to Kiernan Dewsbury-Hall’s outstanding opening goal on Monday, which a furious Gueye was sent off after he and Keane squared off.

Recommended Stories

list of 4 itemsend of list

With a win, United could have moved up to fifth place in the Premier League game against United at Old Trafford after winning it five games in a row.

They had the best chance of holding on to the hosts’ possession, especially in the second half, but Everton brilliantly defended them from the visitors, who appeared slack in attack.

With 10 minutes left, Everton goalkeeper Jordan Pickford made several excellent saves to keep his team in control, with the winner being Joshua Zirkzee’s header.

Everton moved into 11th place on 18 points with United, who are above them on goal difference, thanks to a second away win of the season.

Seamus Coleman’s injury dealt Everton a major blow in the tenth minute.

Three minutes later, a barely believable fling between Gueye and Keane was revealed.

The Premier League Match Center stated on X: “Gueye was shown a red card for violent conduct by the referee, and the outcome was deemed to be a clear strike on Keane’s face.”

Gueye is the first Premier League player to receive a red card since 2008 after engaging in combat with a teammate.

Michael Keane gets a red card from Adam Vaughan/EPA when Idrissa Gueye slaps him in the face.

United lacked the momentum to take advantage of their numerical advantage, defeating David Moyes’s formidable opposition team.

Instead, Everton, a 10-man side, found the net and took the lead with a superb strike from Dewsbury-Hall in the 29th minute.

After Bruno Fernandes and Leny Yoro beat each other, Dewsbury-Hall blasted the ball into the top corner and headed toward the goal.

For the remainder of the half, United huffed and puffed, with Pickford edging a Fernandes cross from distance as half-time approached.

At half-time, Ruben Amorim replaced Noussair Mazraoui for Mason Mount, but despite dominating possession, his team made little progress despite taking the field.

In the 58th minute, Amorim added Kobbie Mainoo and Diogo Dalot for Casemiro and Yoro, but United still looked unimpressed.

With just over 10 minutes left, Pickford stayed on top and won the famous match.

Dewsbury-Hall referred to the game as a “rollercoaster” of a game afterward.

“I’m so genuinely pleased for the young people and how hard they worked.” He praised his outstanding efforts to persevere, accomplish a goal, and maintain that spirit. “So happy we received the three points,”

He claimed Gueye expressed regret to the team at the end of the game for the confrontation with Keane.

We leave now,” the statement read. We had an incredible response. Top tier, according to Dewsbury-Hall.

“We could have crumbled, but it made us grow,” the statement goes.

After a strong start, United defender Matthijs de Ligt called the outcome and performance a “step back” for his side.

The Dutch defender claimed that the game suffices when played against 10 men for 70 minutes without creating many chances. “We had a bad night today,” he said.

We crossed many balls and had no patience to play along the lines. There must be much more.

Ethiopian volcano erupts after lying dormant for 12,000 years

G20 fails to deliver on sovereign debt distress

Over the weekend, heads of state from the world’s most powerful nations gathered in Johannesburg, South Africa, for a summit that had been touted as a turning point for addressing global debt issues under the auspices of the G20.

President of South Africa Cyril Ramaphosa had consistently stated that the issue was at the center of his agenda, arguing that governments, especially in Africa, have little room to fund essential services like healthcare and education due to rising interest rates in debt.

Recommended Stories

list of 4 itemsend of list

However, South Africa did not make any additional recommendations for easing fiscal restraints in indebted countries despite repeated pledges, including those made in the leaders’ summit declaration to “strengthen the implementation of the G20 Common Framework.”

As a result of Washington’s retreat from multilateralism, hopes that world leaders would use the G20 summit to address sovereign debt issues were further squandered when South Africa and US President Donald Trump retreated from the summit.

Following presidencies held by Indonesia in 2022, India in 2023, and Brazil in 2024, the summit also marked the end of a brief period of Global South leadership in the G20. On December 1, the US will assume the presidency of the G20.

Debt “vulnerabilities”

The G20, which consists of 19 developed and emerging economies, the European Union, and the African Union, accounts for roughly two-thirds of the world’s population and contributes to 85 percent of GDP.

A consensus statement on debt was agreed upon by G20 finance ministers and central bank chiefs in Washington in October.

In many developing economies, the high level of debt is one of the barriers to inclusive growth, which prevents them from investing in infrastructure, disaster recovery, healthcare, education, and other development needs, the statement said.

Additionally, it pledged to “reaffirm our commitment to support efforts by low- and middle-income countries to address debt vulnerabilities in an effective, comprehensive, and systematic manner.”

The G20’s highly critical Common Framework, a framework that was introduced five years ago to accede and simplify debt restructuring, was being improved by the communique.

In addition, the statement advocated for more regional development bank lending and greater transparency regarding debt reporting.

record-breaking debt

Total debt in developing nations has reached a record high of $ 109 trillion by the middle of 2025, according to the Institute of International Finance, a branch of the banking industry.

Many developing nations have relied on debt to stabilize their economies, outpacing other investments in recent years due to COVID-19, climate shocks, and rising food prices. For instance, according to a recent UN report, more than 40% of African governments use debt servicing more than healthcare.

Additionally, Africa is plagued by high borrowing costs. In Latin America and the Caribbean, bond yields, which are the interest on government debt, were on average 6.8% and 9.8% in Africa in 2023.

To achieve the Paris Agreement goals, Africa collectively needs $143 billion in climate finance each year. In 2022, it received approximately $44bn.

In 2024, countries on the continent served their external debt for almost $90 billion at the same time.

No improvement

165 organizations urged President Ramaphosa to implement reforms before transferring the G20 presidency to the US in December and condemned the group’s slow progress on debt sustainability shortly before the release of its final statement.

There is no evidence that, during the South African presidency, any progress has been made in addressing the debt crisis facing Africa and many other countries around the world, despite the fact that the G20 has been designated as an “Africa G20” this year, according to the group’s letter.

The International Monetary Fund (IMF) was instructed to sell its gold reserves and establish a debt relief fund for troubled governments in the missive. Additionally, it supported the establishment of a “borrowers club” to promote cooperation between low-income nations.

The demand for a unified debtor body is a result of growing frustration with the frameworks currently in place, most notably the Paris Club, which has allowed mostly Western governments to influence their own repayment practices.

To aid developing nations in coping with the COVID-19 crisis, the G20 established a multibillion-dollar repayment pause in May 2020. The program, known as the Debt Service Suspension Initiative, is still helping some participating nations.

Soon after the Common Framework was launched, it was intended to coordinate all creditors’ debt relief. The Paris Club, China, and private creditors were involved in the initiative at the time, which helped stop developing nations from experiencing a full-fledged debt crisis.

However, the coordination of equal treatment between government lenders, commercial banks, and bondholders has caused delays and setbacks.

Ethiopia, Zambia, Ghana, and Chad are the only nations that have yet to have completed their debt restructuring agreements.

According to ONE Campaign, an advocacy group, the program has only slashed the four participating countries’ debt by just 7% even then.

‘Outmanoeuvred’

A former finance minister and a former Kenyan central banker convened an expert panel in South Africa in March to discuss ways to assist heavily indebted low-income nations, particularly in Africa.

The panel echoed many of the ideas put forth by the 165 charities that wrote to Ramaphosa in October, calling for initiatives like the creation of a debtors’ club and an IMF-backed special debt fund.

However, the leaders’ summit’s experts’ proposals weren’t even acknowledged, according to Kevin Gallagher, director of Boston University’s Global Development Policy Center. He claimed that the G20 presidency “did not address the magnitude of the global debt problem.”

In the end, Gallagher added, “South Africa was outmanoeuvred by larger, more economically significant G20 members who saw little benefit in themselves in reforming the international financial system on debt.”

Double whammy of debt

More than $75 billion in debt, or roughly 40% of all external debt, was cancelled by the IMF, World Bank, and some Paris Club creditors in the Heavily Indebted Poor Countries Initiative in the early 2000s.

However, many developing nations have since retreated to the black. Private creditors continued to invest in low-income countries after the financial crisis of 2008, steadily replacing the less expensive loans that were once provided by organizations like the World Bank.

Nearly 40% of lower-income nations’ external public debt repayments went to commercial lenders between 2020 and 2025. According to Debt Justice, a charity based in the United Kingdom, only one-third of those funds went to multilateral organizations.

China has also grown to be the largest single creditor in the world, especially in the Global South, dedicating more than $472 billion to its policy banks between 2008 and 2024, including the China Development Bank and the Export-Import Bank.

There are now a wider range of lenders that developing nations have turned to, according to Iolanda Fresnillo, a policy and advocacy manager at Eurodad, a civil society organization.

“It’s been a double whammy,” he said. She cited the difficulty of coordinating creditors during a restructuring as being more expensive and difficult to resolve. By stifling public investment, prolonged debt crises stifle growth.

When creditors pursue competing commercial interests, it becomes more difficult to overcome these obstacles. An independent, negotiation-sped up debt-restructuring body, according to Fresnillo, could be a boon.

Rebeca Grynspan, the head of the UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), stated in September that “there is no permanent institution or system that is always dealing with debt restructuring. Maybe we can create new momentum.”

However, there is no new information about an international mechanism to reduce sovereign debt. In the late 1990s, the IMF spearheaded a push for a neutral body that resembled a US bankruptcy court.

The Fund’s proposed restructuring plan received swift opposition. The US and other major creditor nations objected to giving power to an international body that might undermine the US’s legal system and weaken investor protections.

Fresnillo points out that “the need for this kind of international solution is obvious.” A bare minimum should be required in order to solve every new debt crisis, as opposed to an impromptu negotiation.

Trump says ‘very good’ phone call with Xi builds on fragile trade truce

As relations appeared to be gaining new life since the pair’s meeting last month in South Korea, Donald Trump and Xi Jinping held a comprehensive phone call on topics including trade and Taiwan.

The US president praised the two countries’ “extremely strong” relationship hours after the call on Monday, praising the “very good” morning call that included an exchange of invitations to each other’s nations and announcing that he and Xi had spoken about the war in Ukraine, fentanyl trafficking, and a farming agreement.

Recommended Stories

list of 3 itemsend of list

Trump said, “We now have a clear focus on the big picture, and we have agreed that communication is crucial,” and that he is looking forward to doing so. President Xi will travel to the US later this year, and President Trump has accepted an invitation to visit China in April.

Trump made no mention of Taiwan discussions. According to a report from the Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Xi told Trump that the island’s return to China was an “integral part of the post-war international order” created through the US-China joint campaign against “fascism and militarism.”

Xi made the comments as his nation squared off against Japan over the future of the self-governing island, which China views as its territory. Sanae Takaichi, the country’s prime minister, recently stated that the military of Japan was prepared to defend Taiwan.

Trump told Xi that the US, which continues to be Taiwan’s most important partner and supplier of weapons, “understands how important the Taiwan question is to China.”

The Trump administration’s most recent push to end Ukraine’s war also coincided with the phone call. China has asserted that it is a neutral force in the conflict. In a call on Monday, Xi stated that he was in favor of “all efforts that promote peace,” and that he hoped the crisis would be “at its core” in a letter to the Foreign Ministry.

As a result of a trade war between the two countries that rocked global markets, the two men had a personal conversation almost a month after they had met in person in Busan, South Korea.

Beijing agreed to end export restrictions on crucial minerals for a year as a result of a tentative agreement reached at the meeting in October.

After shunning the product for months, Washington announced it would lower tariffs on Chinese goods and that Beijing would increase purchases of soya beans from US farmers.

Trump claimed on Monday that he and his Chinese counterpart had spoken about “Fentanyl, Soybeans, and other Farm Products.”