Whether it is forehand, backhand or a slice, knowing what type of shot to play and when is key to winning tennis matches.
But so too is a player’s position on the court – with the very best in the world knowing where to be to anticipate a return, or to gain a few more valuable seconds to plan their next move.
Few are better masters of this art than Carlos Alcaraz, who is proving to be one of the most complete players on the tour at the moment.
Having won the French Open in his final match of the clay season, the 22-year-old Spaniard transitioned to grass seamlessly by winning Queen’s for the second time last week.
It sets him up perfectly for the pursuit of a third title in a row at Wimbledon, where his dominance of the court will once again come to the fore.
“He is so exciting,” former British number one John Lloyd told BBC Sport.
“He is so quick, lightning quick, groundstrokes are huge both sides. He has one of the best volleys on the tour, his serves are getting better and better.
“He is a showman and a great entertainer.”
From all over to behind the baseline – the evolution of play
To understand a bit more about why five-time Grand Slam champion Alcaraz is so good it is worth checking back on how tennis has changed over the years.
Playing styles have gone from almost every part of the court being covered by a player to the game now being predominantly fought out from behind the baseline.
Although improvements in grass maintenance will undoubtedly have played a part, this evolution can be seen in images from Wimbledon over the years, with more patches of wear evident on more areas of the grass in the 1970s and 1980s compared to more recent years.
The statistics that show the decline of the serve-and-volley game do seem to correspond with the changes to where grass wear at Wimbledon can be seen.
In 2002, serve-and-volley points in the men’s draw accounted for 32.6% of total service points won, but by 2018 that figure was down to 6.93%.
Skip image gallery
Wimbledon
Wimbledon
Wimbledon
1 of 4
‘He takes the tour to new levels’ – how Alcaraz dominates the court
The above detail is relevant because Alcaraz has shown he is adept at both styles of play.
In last year’s men’s final at Wimbledon, the old and the new guard were matched up for the second year in a row as Alcaraz faced 24-time Grand Slam champion Novak Djokovic.
There, Alcaraz dictated play with his speed and movement, causing Djokovic to lose confidence in his ability to live with his opponent from the back of the court and instead rush to the net.
It was a trap that worked as Djokovic won just 50.9% of his points at the net, compared to 72.7% for Alcaraz.
But the younger man was just as strong when staying on the baseline where once again his quick movement and powerful ball striking was too much for Djokovic, who was placed under near constant pressure by Alcaraz.
“In that final, Djokovic was only able to generate three break points and won one, whereas Alcaraz was able to generate 14 break points and won five, so there was constant pressure on him,” says Craig O’Shannessy, tennis analyst and founder of Brain Game Tennis, who has worked with Djokovic.
“And from the ground stroke department Alcaraz had too much firepower from the back, hitting 21 forehand winners while Djokovic hit six.
Skip image gallery
1 of 6
Alcaraz’s dominance of the court was once again on show at Queen’s and, at 22, he has already won four grass-court titles – as many as compatriot Rafael Nadal secured in his career.
Nadal, of course, was the ‘King of Clay’ given his brilliance on that surface, but Alcaraz is showing proficiency on all court types.
“It is never a letdown with this player,” said former British number one Andrew Castle, who was commentating on the Queen’s tournament.
“Expectation every time he plays is always high and it is just supreme performances lately week in and week out.”
“His movement is incredible,” adds O’Shannessy.
“His acceleration from the first two or three steps helps him get to balls other players can’t, and then also his recovery out of the shot is incredibly fast as well.
“When I saw him up close and personal for the very first time, I was blown away. I didn’t think people could move that well on a tennis court.
Video analysis and warm-up tricks – getting the edge on an opponent
Being able to anticipate a player’s movement on the court and the type of shots they will probably play is key to securing victory, which is why someone as unpredictable as Alcaraz is so hard to play against.
Most players fall into familiar patterns of play and studying those becomes important in attempting to secure the edge.
“Gabriel Diallo is a guy I work with and he was playing in Majorca recently, and for his match with Jaume Munar I sent a detailed game plan to him on how to face him,” says O’Shannessy.
“Things I’ll usually show will include where the serve’s going, what kind of serve he likes to hit, and then where on the court he’s more vulnerable to make errors, particularly forehand errors. Because they happen more often than anything else.”
Another important battleground can be the warm-up.
Rather than being – as it may seem to those watching – just two players getting ready for the match, it also presents an opportunity to see how the opponent will react to certain types of shots.
“In the warm-up you may want to disguise the type of shots you want to hit,” adds O’Shannessy.
“I think it’s probably more of an advantage at the club level because you don’t necessarily know the opponent or have scouting on them.
Can anyone stop Alcaraz?
Alcaraz heads to Wimbledon looking to complete a hat-trick of titles and, having won his past 18 matches in a row, he is in a strong position to do just that.
World number one Jannik Sinner – who lost out to Alcaraz in an epic French Open final earlier this month – will be looking to stop him, as well as Djokovic, the runner-up in the past two Wimbledon finals.
But they will know they face a tough task against a player in form.
“When he’s on it, he is the most complete player of his age I have ever seen,” Lloyd says of Alcaraz.
“You look at him already and he’s the finished package.”
Castle is similarly impressed, adding: “He is setting new standards along with Jannik Sinner, the current number one.
Whether it is forehand, backhand or a slice, knowing what type of shot to play and when is key to winning tennis matches.
But so too is a player’s position on the court – with the very best in the world knowing where to be to anticipate a return, or to gain a few more valuable seconds to plan their next move.
Few are better masters of this art than Carlos Alcaraz, who is proving to be one of the most complete players on the tour at the moment.
Having won the French Open in his final match of the clay season, the 22-year-old Spaniard transitioned to grass seamlessly by winning Queen’s for the second time last week.
It sets him up perfectly for the pursuit of a third title in a row at Wimbledon, where his dominance of the court will once again come to the fore.
“He is so exciting,” former British number one John Lloyd told BBC Sport.
“He is so quick, lightning quick, groundstrokes are huge both sides. He has one of the best volleys on the tour, his serves are getting better and better.
“He is a showman and a great entertainer.”
From all over to behind the baseline – the evolution of play
To understand a bit more about why five-time Grand Slam champion Alcaraz is so good it is worth checking back on how tennis has changed over the years.
Playing styles have gone from almost every part of the court being covered by a player to the game now being predominantly fought out from behind the baseline.
Although improvements in grass maintenance will undoubtedly have played a part, this evolution can be seen in images from Wimbledon over the years, with more patches of wear evident on more areas of the grass in the 1970s and 1980s compared to more recent years.
The statistics that show the decline of the serve-and-volley game do seem to correspond with the changes to where grass wear at Wimbledon can be seen.
In 2002, serve-and-volley points in the men’s draw accounted for 32.6% of total service points won, but by 2018 that figure was down to 6.93%.
Skip image gallery
Wimbledon
Wimbledon
Wimbledon
1 of 4
‘He takes the tour to new levels’ – how Alcaraz dominates the court
The above detail is relevant because Alcaraz has shown he is adept at both styles of play.
In last year’s men’s final at Wimbledon, the old and the new guard were matched up for the second year in a row as Alcaraz faced 24-time Grand Slam champion Novak Djokovic.
There, Alcaraz dictated play with his speed and movement, causing Djokovic to lose confidence in his ability to live with his opponent from the back of the court and instead rush to the net.
It was a trap that worked as Djokovic won just 50.9% of his points at the net, compared to 72.7% for Alcaraz.
But the younger man was just as strong when staying on the baseline where once again his quick movement and powerful ball striking was too much for Djokovic, who was placed under near constant pressure by Alcaraz.
“In that final, Djokovic was only able to generate three break points and won one, whereas Alcaraz was able to generate 14 break points and won five, so there was constant pressure on him,” says Craig O’Shannessy, tennis analyst and founder of Brain Game Tennis, who has worked with Djokovic.
“And from the ground stroke department Alcaraz had too much firepower from the back, hitting 21 forehand winners while Djokovic hit six.
Skip image gallery
1 of 6
Alcaraz’s dominance of the court was once again on show at Queen’s and, at 22, he has already won four grass-court titles – as many as compatriot Rafael Nadal secured in his career.
Nadal, of course, was the ‘King of Clay’ given his brilliance on that surface, but Alcaraz is showing proficiency on all court types.
“It is never a letdown with this player,” said former British number one Andrew Castle, who was commentating on the Queen’s tournament.
“Expectation every time he plays is always high and it is just supreme performances lately week in and week out.”
“His movement is incredible,” adds O’Shannessy.
“His acceleration from the first two or three steps helps him get to balls other players can’t, and then also his recovery out of the shot is incredibly fast as well.
“When I saw him up close and personal for the very first time, I was blown away. I didn’t think people could move that well on a tennis court.
Video analysis and warm-up tricks – getting the edge on an opponent
Being able to anticipate a player’s movement on the court and the type of shots they will probably play is key to securing victory, which is why someone as unpredictable as Alcaraz is so hard to play against.
Most players fall into familiar patterns of play and studying those becomes important in attempting to secure the edge.
“Gabriel Diallo is a guy I work with and he was playing in Majorca recently, and for his match with Jaume Munar I sent a detailed game plan to him on how to face him,” says O’Shannessy.
“Things I’ll usually show will include where the serve’s going, what kind of serve he likes to hit, and then where on the court he’s more vulnerable to make errors, particularly forehand errors. Because they happen more often than anything else.”
Another important battleground can be the warm-up.
Rather than being – as it may seem to those watching – just two players getting ready for the match, it also presents an opportunity to see how the opponent will react to certain types of shots.
“In the warm-up you may want to disguise the type of shots you want to hit,” adds O’Shannessy.
“I think it’s probably more of an advantage at the club level because you don’t necessarily know the opponent or have scouting on them.
Can anyone stop Alcaraz?
Alcaraz heads to Wimbledon looking to complete a hat-trick of titles and, having won his past 18 matches in a row, he is in a strong position to do just that.
World number one Jannik Sinner – who lost out to Alcaraz in an epic French Open final earlier this month – will be looking to stop him, as well as Djokovic, the runner-up in the past two Wimbledon finals.
But they will know they face a tough task against a player in form.
“When he’s on it, he is the most complete player of his age I have ever seen,” Lloyd says of Alcaraz.
“You look at him already and he’s the finished package.”
Castle is similarly impressed, adding: “He is setting new standards along with Jannik Sinner, the current number one.
Whether it is forehand, backhand or a slice, knowing what type of shot to play and when is key to winning tennis matches.
But so too is a player’s position on the court – with the very best in the world knowing where to be to anticipate a return, or to gain a few more valuable seconds to plan their next move.
Few are better masters of this art than Carlos Alcaraz, who is proving to be one of the most complete players on the tour at the moment.
Having won the French Open in his final match of the clay season, the 22-year-old Spaniard transitioned to grass seamlessly by winning Queen’s for the second time last week.
It sets him up perfectly for the pursuit of a third title in a row at Wimbledon, where his dominance of the court will once again come to the fore.
“He is so exciting,” former British number one John Lloyd told BBC Sport.
“He is so quick, lightning quick, groundstrokes are huge both sides. He has one of the best volleys on the tour, his serves are getting better and better.
“He is a showman and a great entertainer.”
From all over to behind the baseline – the evolution of play
To understand a bit more about why five-time Grand Slam champion Alcaraz is so good it is worth checking back on how tennis has changed over the years.
Playing styles have gone from almost every part of the court being covered by a player to the game now being predominantly fought out from behind the baseline.
Although improvements in grass maintenance will undoubtedly have played a part, this evolution can be seen in images from Wimbledon over the years, with more patches of wear evident on more areas of the grass in the 1970s and 1980s compared to more recent years.
The statistics that show the decline of the serve-and-volley game do seem to correspond with the changes to where grass wear at Wimbledon can be seen.
In 2002, serve-and-volley points in the men’s draw accounted for 32.6% of total service points won, but by 2018 that figure was down to 6.93%.
Skip image gallery
Wimbledon
Wimbledon
Wimbledon
1 of 4
‘He takes the tour to new levels’ – how Alcaraz dominates the court
The above detail is relevant because Alcaraz has shown he is adept at both styles of play.
In last year’s men’s final at Wimbledon, the old and the new guard were matched up for the second year in a row as Alcaraz faced 24-time Grand Slam champion Novak Djokovic.
There, Alcaraz dictated play with his speed and movement, causing Djokovic to lose confidence in his ability to live with his opponent from the back of the court and instead rush to the net.
It was a trap that worked as Djokovic won just 50.9% of his points at the net, compared to 72.7% for Alcaraz.
But the younger man was just as strong when staying on the baseline where once again his quick movement and powerful ball striking was too much for Djokovic, who was placed under near constant pressure by Alcaraz.
“In that final, Djokovic was only able to generate three break points and won one, whereas Alcaraz was able to generate 14 break points and won five, so there was constant pressure on him,” says Craig O’Shannessy, tennis analyst and founder of Brain Game Tennis, who has worked with Djokovic.
“And from the ground stroke department Alcaraz had too much firepower from the back, hitting 21 forehand winners while Djokovic hit six.
Skip image gallery
1 of 6
Alcaraz’s dominance of the court was once again on show at Queen’s and, at 22, he has already won four grass-court titles – as many as compatriot Rafael Nadal secured in his career.
Nadal, of course, was the ‘King of Clay’ given his brilliance on that surface, but Alcaraz is showing proficiency on all court types.
“It is never a letdown with this player,” said former British number one Andrew Castle, who was commentating on the Queen’s tournament.
“Expectation every time he plays is always high and it is just supreme performances lately week in and week out.”
“His movement is incredible,” adds O’Shannessy.
“His acceleration from the first two or three steps helps him get to balls other players can’t, and then also his recovery out of the shot is incredibly fast as well.
“When I saw him up close and personal for the very first time, I was blown away. I didn’t think people could move that well on a tennis court.
Video analysis and warm-up tricks – getting the edge on an opponent
Being able to anticipate a player’s movement on the court and the type of shots they will probably play is key to securing victory, which is why someone as unpredictable as Alcaraz is so hard to play against.
Most players fall into familiar patterns of play and studying those becomes important in attempting to secure the edge.
“Gabriel Diallo is a guy I work with and he was playing in Majorca recently, and for his match with Jaume Munar I sent a detailed game plan to him on how to face him,” says O’Shannessy.
“Things I’ll usually show will include where the serve’s going, what kind of serve he likes to hit, and then where on the court he’s more vulnerable to make errors, particularly forehand errors. Because they happen more often than anything else.”
Another important battleground can be the warm-up.
Rather than being – as it may seem to those watching – just two players getting ready for the match, it also presents an opportunity to see how the opponent will react to certain types of shots.
“In the warm-up you may want to disguise the type of shots you want to hit,” adds O’Shannessy.
“I think it’s probably more of an advantage at the club level because you don’t necessarily know the opponent or have scouting on them.
Can anyone stop Alcaraz?
Alcaraz heads to Wimbledon looking to complete a hat-trick of titles and, having won his past 18 matches in a row, he is in a strong position to do just that.
World number one Jannik Sinner – who lost out to Alcaraz in an epic French Open final earlier this month – will be looking to stop him, as well as Djokovic, the runner-up in the past two Wimbledon finals.
But they will know they face a tough task against a player in form.
“When he’s on it, he is the most complete player of his age I have ever seen,” Lloyd says of Alcaraz.
“You look at him already and he’s the finished package.”
Castle is similarly impressed, adding: “He is setting new standards along with Jannik Sinner, the current number one.
BBC racing commentator John Hunt, whose wife and two of his daughters were murdered last July, describes in an emotional first interview the legacy of love they left behind.
According to John and his daughter Amy, it was this that had allowed them to endure their agony and trauma.
Carol, Louise and Hannah remained such a constant presence in their lives that he still talks to them every day, almost a year on from their deaths, John says.
He says, “I greet each of them when I wake up,” he says.
“Sometimes I say out loud to Hannah and Louise, ‘ girls, sorry I can’t be with you, I’m with your mum at the moment’. I chat with them as well as closing my eyes at night. They’re very close to me all the time”.
Because they don’t want their loved ones to be defined by their deaths, John and Amy say they made the decision to speak out now. They also feel much of the initial reporting after the murders was inaccurate and it added to their pain.
Additionally, they’ve shared family photos with the BBC that have never been seen.
Kyle Clifford fatally stabbed 61-year-old Carol, raped his former partner, Louise, 25, then used a crossbow to shoot both her and her sister Hannah, 28 – all at their family home in Bushey, Hertfordshire, in July last year.
My mother, Hannah, and Louise became a statistic, according to Amy, the moment Clifford left their home on the day of the incident. They became victims of Kyle Clifford”.
“I want to give my mother, Hannah, and Louise, who are all capable of being fully-rounded, new life.”
Amy and John tell the BBC’s Derbyshire, Victoria they also strongly reject reports there were clear signs of abuse by Clifford during his relationship with Louise.
The Hunt family has always had a close relationship.
In the early years of their marriage, Carol encouraged John – then a police officer – to pursue his dream of becoming a racing commentator.
Their three daughters, Amy, the eldest, Hannah, the middle daughter, and Louise, the “baby,” inherited that unwavering conviction. They talked all the time and shared everything with each other.
In their Bushey, Hertfordshire, house, John, Carol, Hannah, and Louise coexisted. Louise ran a dog-grooming business from a pod in the garden and Hannah worked in aesthetics and beauty.
According to John, their life was “one of complete happiness – awash with it, really.”
They remember one Friday night last May, two months before the murders, when the three sisters had gone out for sushi together.
We talked about how lucky we were as a family, having the right parents, and having a good life, Amy says.
John agrees, and adds that when Hannah came home from the dinner, she was “typically effusive”.
“She stormed through the door, and Carol said, “You had a lovely time,” she said. And she said, ‘ do you know what, mum? We discussed our level of affluence. We have been so lucky. Through your life, he claims, “we haven’t experienced a minute of worry or concern.”
“It’s a beautiful thing to recall. At the same time, it was beautiful to hear.
Although the family was happy, Louise and Clifford’s relationship had started to deteriorate. At the end of June, Louise broke up with him.
On the pretext of returning some of Louise’s items, Clifford showed up at the family’s home on July 9th, less than two weeks later.
Doorbell footage captured the moment Carol opened the door to Clifford, and greeted him with friendly advice.
She said to him, “Maybe… maybe think about it in the next relationship,” and perhaps try to change. If you carry on like this you’ll end up on your own”. Clifford accepted and informed her that he had begun therapy, which appeared to be cordial.
Carol turned to go into the house, and Clifford followed her inside.
After waiting in the house for Louise to return from her dog grooming pod, he then repeatedly stabbed her. When she did, he restrained, raped, and killed her with a crossbow. He also shot Hannah with the crossbow when she later came back.
In her dying moments, Hannah messaged her boyfriend, Alex, and managed to call 999. She was able to explain what had occurred to them and, crucially, who was at fault. John was in central London at the time. He thinks Clifford intended to murder him as well.
“Police officers of 30 years ‘ experience had their breath taken away by how brave she was, how she was able to think so clearly in that moment, to know what she needed to do”, John says.
When questioned about whether Hannah’s actions saved his life, John replies, “That’s what I think.”
Hunt family / BBC News
The narrative grew too contrived as the murders’ stories became more and more prevalent.
John says” from day one “their family – and in particular, Louise – was” completely misrepresented in the media and on social media”, including false suggestions Louise was in a controlling and coercive relationship with Kyle Clifford.
He and Amy recall misinformation from news websites, including the claim that John was responsible for bringing his wife and daughters’ bodies into their home.
They also remember photographs being lifted from their loved ones ‘ social media pages by sections of the media without consent, something John describes as” grave-robbing”.
Amy recalls a newspaper headline that read, “Crossbow maniac was jilted,” a framing she calls “victim-blaming.”
But most painful, they say, were claims in the press that there were clear signs of abuse and misogyny in Clifford’s relationship with Louise.
The family, according to John and Amy, had reservations about Clifford because some aspects of him weren’t particularly warm to them. He was immature and, at times, inconsiderate. They claim that he struggled with conflict and was unattemptful. The family, including Louise, would talk to each other about Clifford’s lack of consideration.
They claim that their relationship sounded unremarkable. The two of them would giggle and cuddle in the house, watch films together, cook together, go on holidays to Europe and take weekend trips to the seaside.
Hunt family / BBC News
A turning point came when the couple went away for a friend’s wedding. Louise had trouble using the oven in their home the night before the wedding. The next day, when other wedding guests asked Louise what she did for a living, Clifford would interject with the barb that” one thing she doesn’t do is know how to work an oven properly”.
Clifford began to denigrate her. When looking through the couple’s text messages after Louise’s death – something John says he found” very difficult to do “as the messages were personal to Louise – they noticed signs, from spring 2024, of” gentle manipulation”.
But did they notice anything that suggested the relationship was abusive at the time?
No, John says. When Louise and Clifford were together, Cliff never physically assaulted her. The family also never heard them raise their voices at each other.
There was a clear indication that he had turned out to be a bad person at the time Louise and Louise ended the relationship, Amy claims.
” But I want to put it very bluntly now. Was there any evidence to support this man’s ability to murder my mother, tie up Louise, rape Louise, shoot Hannah and stab me? Absolutely not.
He’s frequently called a “crossbow killer” and a “crossbow maniac,” but that distracts from the very real problem that we are aware of. He was just a person, just a man… who went to the gym, had a family, had a relationship, watched TV.
In the months that followed the murders, John and Amy had to navigate a complex criminal justice system.
John makes a point of highlighting the”extraordinary people” who supported them: the police, their family liaison, their lawyer, and the compassionate judge who oversaw the rape trial and sentenced Clifford. They were, they say”, very lucky to have met these people in these terrible circumstances”.
He continues, “each of them is operating in a system that is obviously not fit for purpose.”
On the day Clifford appeared at magistrates ‘ court after being charged, John and Amy’s family liaison officers weren’t able to attend the hearing with them as they were at another murder in Luton.
“It just so happened that they uncovered aspects of the murders from nobody that we had not even heard of,” John says in the magistrates’ court that morning. That was an awful day. “
Then, using a newspaper headline, Amy learned the details of her sister Hannah’s final words.
When they spoke to the CPS about their concerns, they were given a complaint form and told to return it within 28 working days -” as if we’d had our bike stolen”.
Amy claims that the hearing was called off because the prison transportation “didn’t turn up to take him to court” on another day when Clifford was scheduled to enter his pleas.
The proceedings were long and torturous for John and Amy. Before entering a guilty plea, Clifford initially denied the allegations against him, with the exception of the rape one. This meant the case had to go to trial. In March, he was found guilty.
Clifford refused to attend his sentencing later that month, meaning he did not hear the judge’s damning comments about him, or the devastating testimonies written by John and Amy.
According to Amy, “It’s consistently a system that prioritizes the perpetrator.” That’s a traumatising thing for so many people. “
The Hunt family, who had the courage and strength to go to court every day and witness the harrowing truth of what happened to Carol, Louise, and Hannah, is described as having “the utmost admiration for the Hunt family.”
Hunt family / BBC News
In the months since the sentencing, John and Amy say they’ve been trying to focus on living again.
How on earth am I ever going to care about anything ever again when it happened? John says.
“It’s fine to sit there and contemplate that in the wreckage of our personal disaster.” But you come to realise that, with a little bit of work, you can find some light again”.
He claims that they have found solace in loving one another, supportive groups, mindfulness training, and good counsellors and support groups.
But above all, every day he remembers Hannah’s final act, and how it saved his life. He claims, “I get to live.” “Hannah gave me that, and I’ve got to treat it as a gift from her”.
BBC racing commentator John Hunt, whose wife and two of his daughters were murdered last July, describes in an emotional first interview the legacy of love they left behind.
It was this, John and his daughter Amy tell the BBC, that had helped sustain them through their trauma and grief.
Carol, Louise and Hannah remained such a constant presence in their lives that he still talks to them every day, almost a year on from their deaths, John says.
“From the moment I wake up, I say good morning to each of them,” he says.
“Sometimes I say out loud to Hannah and Louise, ‘girls, sorry I can’t be with you, I’m with your mum at the moment’. As I close my eyes at night, I chat to them as well. They’re very close to me all the time.”
John and Amy say they took the decision to talk publicly now because they did not want their loved ones to be defined by their deaths. They also feel much of the initial reporting after the murders was inaccurate and it added to their pain.
They’ve also shared previously unseen family photos with the BBC.
Kyle Clifford fatally stabbed 61-year-old Carol, raped his former partner, Louise, 25, then used a crossbow to shoot both her and her sister Hannah, 28 – all at their family home in Bushey, Hertfordshire, in July last year.
Amy says the minute Clifford left their home on the day of the incident, “my mum, Hannah and Louise became a statistic. They became victims of Kyle Clifford.”
“I want to breathe life back into my mum, Hannah and Louise as fully-rounded people.”
Amy and John tell the BBC’s Victoria Derbyshire they also strongly reject reports there were clear signs of abuse by Clifford during his relationship with Louise.
The Hunt family have always been extremely close.
In the early years of their marriage, Carol encouraged John – then a police officer – to pursue his dream of becoming a racing commentator.
That unending belief was inherited by their three daughters – Amy, the eldest, their middle daughter Hannah, and Louise, “the baby”. They talked all the time and shared everything with each other.
John, Carol, Hannah and Louise lived together in their home in Bushey, Hertfordshire. Louise ran a dog-grooming business from a pod in the garden and Hannah worked in aesthetics and beauty.
Their life, John says, was “one of complete happiness – awash with it, really”.
They remember one Friday night last May, two months before the murders, when the three sisters had gone out for sushi together.
“We were talking about how lucky we’d been as a family, to have had the parents we’ve had and the life we’ve had,” Amy says.
John agrees, and adds that when Hannah came home from the dinner, she was “typically effusive”.
“She came barnstorming through the door, and Carol said something like, ‘you had a lovely time?’ And she said, ‘do you know what, mum? We talked about how lucky we have been. We have been so lucky. We’ve not had a minute of concern or worry through the lives you’ve given us’,” he says.
“It’s a beautiful thing to recall. It was a beautiful thing to hear at the same time.”
While things were idyllic with the family, Louise and Clifford’s relationship had started to sour. At the end of June, Louise broke up with him.
Less than two weeks later, on 9 July, Clifford turned up at the family’s home on the pretext of returning some of Louise’s things.
Doorbell footage captured the moment Carol opened the door to Clifford, and greeted him with friendly advice.
“Maybe… maybe think in the next relationship,” she told him, “the way you are, maybe try and change. If you carry on like this you’ll end up on your own.” Clifford agreed, seemingly cordial, and told her he had started therapy.
Carol turned to go into the house, and Clifford followed her inside.
He then stabbed her multiple times, before waiting in the house for Louise to come back inside from her dog grooming pod. When she did, he restrained, raped, and killed her with a crossbow. When Hannah returned later, he shot her with the crossbow too.
In her dying moments, Hannah messaged her boyfriend, Alex, and managed to call 999. She was able to tell them what had happened and, crucially, who was responsible. John was in central London at the time. He believes Clifford intended to kill him too.
“Police officers of 30 years’ experience had their breath taken away by how brave she was, how she was able to think so clearly in that moment, to know what she needed to do,” John says.
Asked if Hannah’s actions saved his life, John adds: “That’s what I believe.
Hunt family / BBC News
As the news of the murders spread, the narrative spun out of control.
John says “from day one” their family – and in particular, Louise – was “completely misrepresented in the media and on social media”, including false suggestions Louise was in a controlling and coercive relationship with Kyle Clifford.
He and Amy recall misinformation on news sites, including the claim that John had been the one to discover his wife and daughters’ bodies in their home.
They also remember photographs being lifted from their loved ones’ social media pages by sections of the media without consent, something John describes as “grave-robbing”.
Amy recalls one newspaper headline reading, “Crossbow maniac was jilted”, a framing she describes as “victim-blaming”.
But most painful, they say, were claims in the press that there were clear signs of abuse and misogyny in Clifford’s relationship with Louise.
John and Amy say the family had misgivings about Clifford – there were things about him they didn’t particularly warm to. He was immature and, at times, inconsiderate. They say he couldn’t deal with conflict, and was bad at taking criticism. The family, including Louise, would talk to each other about Clifford’s lack of consideration.
But their relationship also seemed unremarkable, they say. The two of them would giggle and cuddle in the house, watch films together, cook together, go on holidays to Europe and take weekend trips to the seaside.
Hunt family / BBC News
A turning point came when the couple went away for a friend’s wedding. The night before the ceremony, Louise struggled to use the oven in their accommodation. The next day, when other wedding guests asked Louise what she did for a living, Clifford would interject with the barb that “one thing she doesn’t do is know how to work an oven properly”.
Clifford started to belittle her. When looking through the couple’s text messages after Louise’s death – something John says he found “very difficult to do” as the messages were personal to Louise – they noticed signs, from spring 2024, of “gentle manipulation”.
But did they notice anything at the time that suggested the relationship was abusive?
No, John says. Clifford never physically assaulted Louise when they were together. The family also never heard them raise their voices at each other.
“At the point of Louise ending [the relationship], there was absolutely evidence that he had turned out not to be a nice person,” Amy says.
“But I want to put it very bluntly now. Did we have any indication that this man was capable of stabbing my mother, of tying Louise up, of raping Louise, of shooting Louise and shooting Hannah? Absolutely not.
“He’s often been referred to as ‘crossbow killer’ and ‘crossbow maniac’ – but that takes away from the very real issue we know to be true. He was just a person, just a man… who went to the gym, had a family, had a relationship, watched TV.
In the months that followed the murders, John and Amy had to navigate a complex criminal justice system.
John makes a point of highlighting the “incredible people” who supported them – the police officers, their family liaison officers, their barrister, and the “compassionate” judge who oversaw the rape trial and sentenced Clifford. They were, they say, “very lucky to have met these people in these terrible circumstances”.
But, he adds, “each of them is working in a system that is clearly not fit for purpose”.
On the day Clifford appeared at magistrates’ court after being charged, John and Amy’s family liaison officers weren’t able to attend the hearing with them as they were at another murder in Luton.
“It just so happened that that morning in the magistrates’ court, they revealed aspects of the murders that we had not heard of at all, from anybody,” John says. “That was an awful day.”
Amy then found out the details of her sister Hannah’s final words on the phone to 999, from a newspaper headline.
When they spoke to the CPS about their concerns, they were given a complaint form and told to return it within 28 working days – “as if we’d had our bike stolen”.
On another day, when Clifford was due to enter his pleas, Amy says they were told the hearing needed to be postponed because the prison transport “didn’t turn up to take him to court”.
The proceedings were long and torturous for John and Amy. Clifford initially denied the charges against him, before pleading guilty to everything except the charge of rape. This meant the case had to go to trial. He was convicted in March.
Clifford refused to attend his sentencing later that month, meaning he did not hear the judge’s damning comments about him, or the devastating testimonies written by John and Amy.
“It’s consistently a system that prioritises the perpetrator,” Amy says. “That’s a traumatising thing for so many people.”
The Crown Prosecution Service says it has apologised, and it has “the utmost admiration for the Hunt family, who had the strength and courage to attend court every day and hear first-hand the devastating truth of what happened to Carol, Louise and Hannah.
Hunt family / BBC News
In the months since the sentencing, John and Amy say they’ve been trying to focus on living again.
“When it happened I thought, ‘how on earth am I ever going to be able to care about anything ever again’?” John says.
“It’s fine to sit with that thought in the wreckage of what was our personal disaster. But you come to realise that, with a little bit of work, you can find some light again.”
He says they’ve found comfort in good counsellors and support groups, mindfulness exercises, and the love and support they have for each other.
But above all, every day he remembers Hannah’s final act, and how it saved his life. “I get to live,” he says. “Hannah gave me that, and I’ve got to treat it as a gift from her.”