Following England’s review of a caught-behind decision with the Australia wicketkeeper on 72 on Wednesday, Alex Carey was given not out for the second day.
He was not out because the technology’s spike was out of tune with the pictures, which the operator later discovered to be an error.
England won 149-5 in the first incident on day two in the 44th over.
After Smith’s ball was slammed against Usman Khawaja at slip, Australia requested a catch, and the on-field umpire, Nitin Menon, sent the decision to the TV umpire to check whether the ball had carried.
After checking whether the ball had struck Smith’s glove or helmet, TV umpire Chris Gaffaney weighed various replays.
The Snicko technology appeared inconclusive despite the TV appearance that the ball must have hit glove, and Gaffaney determined that Smith had been struck by the ball after passing helmet and not glove.
One Australian was heard saying, “Snicko needs to be sacked,” over the stump microphone, and the hosts’ fielders were clearly upset.
This is outrageous, said Marnus Labuschagne, “Nitin.
Has his glove caught the ball?
Menon was reportedly quoted as saying, “We checked for fair catch because we thought the glove was off, but he claims the helmet.”
In any case, it appeared as though Khawaja was unaware of the ball.
Smith’s dismissal was ultimately caused by the second decision.
Pat Cummins was given a pull shot, but Australia confidently appealed for a thin edge.
Smith appeared to be certain that he had not hit the ball when it was released on the field.
Umpire Menon once more suggested that Gaffaney should check whether the ball had carried and that he was unsure whether it had carried.
Nathan Lyon was reportedly eavesdropping on non-striking batter Ben Stokes as the players gathered to wait for the decision.
After watching an initial replay, Snicko showed a rough spike within a frame of the ball passing Smith’s bat, according to Gaffaney, who claimed there was no obviousness.