White House confirms Trump to meet Xi in South Korea as part of Asia tour

A major regional economic summit scheduled for next week will be held in South Korea, according to the White House, which will include a meeting between US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping.

Trump will meet with Xi in South Korea on October 30 for a “bilateral meeting,” according to White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt, before heading back to Washington.

Recommended Stories

list of 3 itemsend of list

On October 31 and November 1, the city of Gyeongju will host the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) summit, an intergovernmental forum promoting free trade between 21 nations located along the Pacific Rim.

Trump’s participation in the APEC summit itself was not made clear by Leavitt.

Trump earlier confirmed his meeting with Xi by saying the leaders “have a pretty long meeting scheduled,” before adding that he hoped the superpowers could “work out a lot of our doubts and questions.”

“I believe something will work out,” he said. Trump said as he addressed questions with NATO’s Mark Rutte at the White House, “We have a very good relationship, but that will be a significant one.”

In the midst of rising trade tensions between the world’s two largest economies, Trump and Xi will meet. If there isn’t a deal reached, the US leader threatened to impose higher levies on Chinese imports into the US. He has already imposed a 30% tariff.

After imposing his first sanctions against Moscow on Wednesday since returning to the White House, Trump added that he will press Xi to avert Chinese companies from purchasing Russian oil.

Russian President Vladimir Putin’s refusal to “end this senseless war” in Ukraine was the cause of the sanctions package, according to US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, which targeted Russia’s two biggest oil companies, Rosneft and Lukoil.

Leavitt stated that Trump would leave the White House on Friday night before setting foot in Malaysia for the ASEAN summit, which will take place on Sunday morning, local time. Leavitt also stated that the US leader would travel to the White House on Friday night.

On Sunday, President Trump will meet with the Malaysian prime minister’s counterpart in the afternoon and then attend the ASEAN leaders’ working dinner that evening, she said.

The US leader will then travel to Tokyo on Monday morning for a meeting with Sanae Takaichi, the country’s new prime minister, on Tuesday.

Leavitt stated that Trump would then “visit Busan on Wednesday [October 29] morning for a bilateral meeting with the president of the Republic of Korea, deliver a keynote address at the APEC CEO luncheon, and attend the leaders’ working dinner that evening.”

According to The Korea Economic Daily newspaper, Korean government officials later confirmed that the meeting with South Korean President Lee Jae Myung would take place in Gyeongju, where the APEC summit is being held this year.

According to the officials, the mix-up is most likely related to Busan’s alleged location, which is where the US-China summit will take place. In her remarks to reporters on Thursday, Leaditt did not confirm where Trump would meet with Xi.

According to South Korean security adviser Wi Sung-lac, President Lee intends to meet with Trump and Xi separately.

We will highlight South Korea’s role as a platform as well as foster consensus for peace, prosperity, and stability in the region through a series of summits, according to Wi told reporters.

He continued, “South Korea is hoping to move forward with Washington on issues involving tariffs and security,” but he had no idea when a deal would be reached.

Can Arsenal’s defence lead them to title glory?

Images courtesy of Getty

It appeared obvious Arsenal would need to improve their attack if they wanted to have a better chance of winning the Premier League this time around, despite having the best defense and scoring 17 fewer goals than champions Liverpool last year.

But because they only conceded three goals in their first eight games this term, giving them a three-point lead in the standings, their already impressive defense has advanced to a level that it might not even need to score many more goals in the end result.

Arsenal’s attack may get better as the season progresses, with Martin Odegaard, Noni Madueke, Gabriel Jesus, Noni Madueke, and Kai Havertz among the creative players currently injured.

Will their defense, however, be sufficient to win the top flight trophy for the first time since 2004?

Only six of the 33 Premier League winners have conceded the fewest goals and not scored the most goals (18%).

What might be different from Arsenal’s defense this time around since they have been at the top of their respective defense for the past two seasons and still managed to finish second?

Even though it’s still early, we’re not just looking at them having the best defense of any Premier League campaign, but also one of the best.

If they were to hold that record for the entire season, they would let in just 14 goals, breaking Jose Mourinho’s title-winning Chelsea side’s incredible record of 15 in 2004-2005. Their current rate of conceding just 0.38 per game.

In fact, Mikel Arteta’s men are almost on par with that amazing team, scoring 71 times and conceding 14 goals, compared to Chelsea’s 72 and 15 respectively, with their current rate of 1.88 goals per game.

That would result in Arsenal scoring two goals more than the 69 last year, but allowing just 20 goals less than the 34 at the time of the year.

Despite their mightily impressive stature, it will take a herculean effort to match the incredible defense of Chelsea 20 years ago.

To match the three goals Chelsea had conceded after 11 games, they must keep clean sheets in their next three games against Crystal Palace, Burnley, and Sunderland.

Not only that, but a large portion of Mourinho’s men only allowed 15 in the league that year was because they didn’t add another one until March 5th, 2005, in a 3-1 victory over Norwich, after conceding twice in a 2-2 draw at Arsenal on December 12.

At the time, that 10-game league clean sheet record was held, but Manchester United’s streak of 14 in 2008-2009 was later broken.

Arsenal won their first Premier League title under Arsene Wenger by going eight games without conceding between January and March 1998.

related subjects

  • Premier League
  • Arsenal
  • Football

More on this story.

  • Arsenal logo
  • Ask Me Anything logo

Can Arsenal’s defence lead them to title glory?

Images courtesy of Getty

It appeared obvious Arsenal would need to improve their attack if they wanted to have a better chance of winning the Premier League this time around, despite having the best defense and scoring 17 fewer goals than champions Liverpool last year.

But because they only conceded three goals in their first eight games this term, giving them a three-point lead in the standings, their already impressive defense has advanced to a level that it might not even need to score many more goals in the end result.

Arsenal’s attack may get better as the season progresses, with Martin Odegaard, Noni Madueke, Gabriel Jesus, Noni Madueke, and Kai Havertz among the creative players currently injured.

Will their defense, however, be sufficient to win the top flight trophy for the first time since 2004?

Only six of the 33 Premier League winners have conceded the fewest goals and not scored the most goals (18%).

What might be different from Arsenal’s defense this time around since they have been at the top of their respective defense for the past two seasons and still managed to finish second?

Even though it’s still early, we’re not just looking at them having the best defense of any Premier League campaign, but also one of the best.

If they were to hold that record for the entire season, they would let in just 14 goals, breaking Jose Mourinho’s title-winning Chelsea side’s incredible record of 15 in 2004-2005. Their current rate of conceding just 0.38 per game.

In fact, Mikel Arteta’s men are almost on par with that amazing team, scoring 71 times and conceding 14 goals, compared to Chelsea’s 72 and 15 respectively, with their current rate of 1.88 goals per game.

That would result in Arsenal scoring two goals more than the 69 last year, but allowing just 20 goals less than the 34 at the time of the year.

Despite their mightily impressive stature, it will take a herculean effort to match the incredible defense of Chelsea 20 years ago.

To match the three goals Chelsea had conceded after 11 games, they must keep clean sheets in their next three games against Crystal Palace, Burnley, and Sunderland.

Not only that, but a large portion of Mourinho’s men only allowed 15 in the league that year was because they didn’t add another one until March 5th, 2005, in a 3-1 victory over Norwich, after conceding twice in a 2-2 draw at Arsenal on December 12.

At the time, that 10-game league clean sheet record was held, but Manchester United’s streak of 14 in 2008-2009 was later broken.

Arsenal won their first Premier League title under Arsene Wenger by going eight games without conceding between January and March 1998.

related subjects

  • Premier League
  • Arsenal
  • Football

More on this story.

  • Arsenal logo
  • Ask Me Anything logo

US man executed with nitrogen gas for 1993 murder

A man was found guilty of murder in the state of Alabama in 1993, and the state administered the execution by using nitrogen gas, a contentious method of execution that some have called “cruel and unusual punishment.”

Anthony Boyd, 54, was put to death in the United States on Thursday evening after killing a man by lighting him on fire in response to a $200 drug debt.

Recommended Stories

list of 4 itemsend of list

Boyd has continued to defend his innocence in his most recent statements. I “didn’t kill anyone,” he said. He said on Thursday, “I didn’t take part in killing anyone,” according to CBS News. “Justice can’t exist until we change this system,” says the statement.

Since January 2024, Alabama has used nitrogen gas on death row prisoners for the seventh time since Boyd’s death.

According to the US Death Penalty Information Center, the method was chosen over an intravenous lethal injection because of the difficulties with administering it and, more recently, because of the combination of toxic drugs.

The length of an execution can be increased by using nitrogen gas, which is a particular contentious use. Boyd had previously requested that he be executed by firing squad, but his request was rejected. He then made an appeal to several courts.

Additionally, his claim that nitrogen gas violates the US Constitution’s Eighth Amendment, which forbids “cruel and unusual punishments,” was rejected by the US Supreme Court.

The Supreme Court’s three liberal justices, Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, and Ketanji Brown Jackson, objected to the court’s majority decision. In her dissention, Sotomayor referred to nitrogen gas as a “torturous suffocation” in contrast to other techniques in her dissention.

She wrote, “Boyd asks for the most lenient form of mercy: to die by a firing squad, which would instantly kill him.” He would be granted that grace by the Constitution. Not even my coworkers. Thus, this Court rejects Boyd and the Eighth Amendment’s protection against cruel and unusual punishment.

The entire process, according to Sarah Clifton, a local reporter who observed Boyd’s execution for the Montgomery Advertiser newspaper on Thursday, lasted almost 40 minutes from the moment he was strapped down until he was declared dead.

At 5:30 p.m. local time, the state ignited nitrogen gas, but Boyd continued to splutter and scream for more than 20 minutes before lying still at 6:30 p.m., according to Clifton. At 6:27 p.m., the state shut off the gas, and Boyd was declared dead at 6:33 p.m.

Boyd had spent 30 years in prison prior to his death. According to the Death Penalty Information Center, he was given the death penalty in 1995 after receiving a 10-to-2 jury verdict in Gregory “New York” Huguley’s murder.

Simon Cowell’s new TV show branded ‘big two fingers up to ITV’ over The X Factor

A brand-new show called Who’s In The Band will feature Simon Cowell, Spice Girl icon Mel B, and Jonas Brothers singer Joe Jonas. A pilot will be filmed the week before the show airs.

One of Simon Cowell’s new projects has been described as “a big two fingers up to ITV”.

The music mogul, 66, has linked up with Netflix for Simon Cowell: The Next Act, a six-episode docuseries which will follow Simon as he searches for Britain’s next big band. He is also going to be on the judging panel of new show Who’s In The Band, which records a pilot next week.

Spice Girl icon Mel B and Jonas Brother singer Joe Jonas will work alongside Simon for the latter, which ex-TV presenter turned producer Richard Bacon says will be popular with teenagers and young adults.

But the Netflix series, Simon Cowell: The Next Act, has particularly excited the TV industry. It is believed Netflix executives “felt bringing a name like Simon in for a factual entertainment show was a power move for the network”. Another source said the programme will be “a big two fingers up to ITV” after the cancellation of The X Factor in 2021.

READ MORE: Katie Price admits to kissing Eminem and two other huge stars including Hollywood iconREAD MORE: Simon Cowell joins forces with Spice Girl and Jonas Brother for brand new show

But a source close to Simon, who created the global X Factor franchise, has denied there is “a rivalry”. They added: “There’s no rivalry nor residual issue – Simon’s focus is entirely on new formats and discovering talent.”

The X Factor, though, was scrapped after nearly 20 years on British TV screens and, at its peak, attracted 10 million viewers on a Saturday evening. It was the launching pad for a number of top-selling British music acts in the last two decades, from One Direction to Little Mix and Leona Lewis.

But Simon, who is thought to be worth £475million, continues to work with ITV on Britain’s Got Talent, which is still a staple after more than 18 years. His latest ventures, though, on other networks have television circles excited, it is understood.

The source told the Daily Mail: “Success on Netflix would be priceless retribution against ITV for the way The X Factor came to a close.” This theory is rejected by Simon, born in Lambeth, south London, whose new show Who’s In The Band will be presented by K-Pop Demon Hunters star Rei Ami, 30.

READ MORE: Amanda Holden brands Simon Cowell ‘evil’ as she shares real reason behind his head injury

Following the chaos caused by Simon’s fall down yet another set of steps, Simon’s latest attempt to find talent came after the long-time judge’s auditions for Britain’s Got Talent went down.

Continue reading the article.

He missed the first two days of filming in Birmingham after the incident, leaving producers to call in Stacey Solomon to temporarily fill his place on the panel. The star then later reappeared on the third day of auditions with a visible graze on his forehead, explaining only that he’d had “an accident.”

Why 25-year-old Mahnoor Omer took Pakistan to court over periods

Mahnoor Omer, who was raised in the city of Rawalpindi and is close to Islamabad, recalls the shame and anxiety she experienced during her period in school. Going to the toilet with a sanitary pad was an act of stealth, like trying to cover up a crime.

Omer, who is from a middle-class family with her father a businessman and her mother a homemaker, recalls how she used to hide her pad up her sleeve like I was taking narcotics to the bathroom. Teachers would dismiss you if someone mentioned it. A classmate once told her that her mother considered pads “a waste of money”.

Omer remarks, “That’s when it hit me.” Imagine how far out of reach these products are for others if middle-class families think that.

Now 25, Omer has gone from cautious schoolgirl to national centrestage in a battle that could reshape menstrual hygiene in Pakistan, a country where critics say economics is compounding social stigma to punish women – simply for being women.

What she and many others claim is a “period tax” that Pakistan’s more than 100 million women are actually subject to in September, Omer, a lawyer, filed a petition with the Lahore High Court in September.

According to the Sales Tax Act of 1990, Pakistani governments have long imposed customs duties of 25% on imported sanitary pads, as well as on raw materials used to make them, on top of the country’s sales tax law. Add on other local taxes, and UNICEF Pakistan says that these pads are often effectively taxed at about 40 percent.

In contrast to a number of constitutional rights, including those that protect equality and dignity, eradication of exploitation, and promotion of social justice, Omer’s petition contends that these taxes, which specifically affect women, are discriminatory.

Omer and other legal professionals who back the petition claim that the taxes make it even more difficult for most Pakistani women to obtain sanitary products in a nation where menstruation is already a taboo topic for most families. A standard pack of commercially branded sanitary pads in Pakistan currently costs about 450 rupees ($1.60) for 10 pieces. That’s the price of a meal of rotis and dal for a low-income family of four in a nation with a monthly per capita income of $120. Reduce the cost by 40%, and the calculations are easier to compare to sanitary pads.

At the moment, only 12 percent of Pakistani women use commercially produced sanitary pads, according to a 2024 study by UNICEF and the WaterAid nonprofit. The rest frequently don’t have access to clean water and frequently use improvised materials like cloth or other materials.

Hira Amjad, the founder and executive director of the Pakistani nonprofit Dastak Foundation, says that if the petition is circulated, it will make pads more affordable.

And that, say lawyers and activists, could serve as a spark for broader social change.

The case is Mahnoor Omer vs. senior Pakistani government officials, according to the court docket. However, Omer doesn’t experience that type of emotion.

“It feels like women versus Pakistan”.

Women in Pakistan receive period kits from menstrual rights activist Mahwari Justice.

It’s not blatant, they say.

Bushra Mahnoor, founder of Mahwari Justice, a Pakistani student-led organisation whose name translates to “menstrual justice”, realised early just how much of a struggle it could be to access sanitary pads.

No relation to Omer, Mahnoor had four sisters growing up in Attock, a city in the Punjab province of Pakistan. I had to check whether there were enough pads each month. If my period came when one of my sisters had hers too”, finding a pad was a challenge, she says.

The conflict persisted in the classroom, where periods were associated with shame, as was the case with Omer. One teacher once forced a classmate to stand for two entire lectures due to the stained uniform of her teacher. “That was dehumanising”, she says.

Mahnoor’s first period was when she was 10 years old. “I was unsure of how to use a pad.” I stuck it upside down, the sticky side touched my skin. It caused pain. Nobody teaches you how to handle it.

She says that shame was never hers alone, but it’s part of a silence which starts at home and accompanies girls into adulthood. According to a study on menstrual health in Pakistan, eight out of ten girls express embarrassed or uneasy feelings when discussing periods, and two out of three girls claim to never have been informed about menstruation before it started. This silence, according to research published in the Frontiers in Public Health journal in 2023, is related to poor hygiene, social exclusion, and missed school days.

In 2022, when floods devastated Pakistan, Mahnoor began Mahwari Justice to ensure that relief camps did not overlook the menstrual needs of women. She says, “We started distributing pads, but we later realized there was so much more to be done.” Her organization has produced rap songs and comics to normalize conversations about menstruation, as well as distributed more than 100, 000 period kits containing pads, soap, underwear, detergent, and painkillers. “When you say the word ‘ mahwari ‘ out loud, you’re teaching people it’s not shameful”, she says. It’s simply life, they say.

Even though Amjad, the founder of the Dastak Foundation, has been in business for ten years, was affected by the same floods. Its work now also includes distributing period kits during natural disasters.

According to Amjad, the social stigma associated with menstruation is also closely related to economics in terms of how Pakistani women are affected by its effects.

She says that in the majority of households, men are responsible for making financial decisions. “Even if the woman is bringing the money, she’s giving it to the man, and he is deciding where that money needs to go”.

And that’s frequently compromised if the health of women feels too expensive. There is no discussion about whether we should buy pads in many homes because of the tax’s exorbitant prices, she says. “It’s an expense they cannot afford organically”.

Over half of Pakistani women are unable to purchase sanitary pads, according to the Frontiers in Public Health study conducted in 2023.

The advantages of menstrual hygiene will go beyond just being healthy, according to Amjad, if the taxes are eliminated and menstrual hygiene is made more affordable.

School attendance rates for girls could improve, she said. According to the United Nations, more than half of Pakistan’s girls between the ages of five and sixteen are not currently in school. “We will have women who are stress-free.” We will have happier and healthier women”.

Lawyer Ahsan Jehangir Khan, the co-petitioner with Mahnoor Omer, in the case demanding an end to the 'period tax'. [Photo courtesy Ahsan Jehangir Khan]
In the lawsuit requesting the end of the “period tax,” lawyer Ahsan Jehangir Khan, co-petitioner with Mahnoor Omer. [Photo courtesy of Ahsan Jehangir Khan]

“Feel of justice”

Omer says her interest in women’s and minority rights began early. She says, “Seeing the blatant mistreatment every day inspired me.” “I never felt comfortable with the economic, physical, or verbal exploitation that women experience on the streets, in the media, or inside homes.”

She credits her mother for making her grow up to be an empathetic and understanding person.

She worked at Crossroads Consultants, a Pakistan-based company that collaborates with NGOs and development partners on gender and criminal justice reform after graduating from college. She has since made a commitment to volunteering at Aurat March, an annual women’s rights protest that takes place every year in Pakistan on International Women’s Day, which she attended when she was 19 years old.

Her first step into activism came at 16, when she and her friends started putting together “dignity kits”, small care packages for women in low-income neighbourhoods of Islamabad. She recalls that “we would use our own money to raise money from bake sales or use our own.”

With the funding she received, she was able to distribute about 300 dignity kits that she and her friends made themselves. They each contained pads, underwear, pain medication and wipes. But she desired more.

In the spring of 2025, she began working as a law clerk at the Supreme Court. She’s currently pursuing postgraduate studies in gender, peace and security at the London School of Economics and says that she will go back to Pakistan to resume her practice after she graduates.

She and fellow lawyer Ahsan Jehangir Khan, who is skilled in constitutional law and taxation, became close friends. Their discussions revealed the strategies to challenge the “period tax.”

“He pushed me to file this petition and try to get justice instead of just sitting around”.

Khan, a co-petitioner in the case, asserts that justice is the key to reducing the taxes rather than accessibility and affordability of sanitary pads. He claims that it’s a tax on a biological function.

Tax policies in Pakistan, he says, are written by “a privileged elite, mostly men who have never had to think about what this tax means for ordinary women”. He continues, “it is very clear that you can’t have anything discriminatory against any gender whatsoever,” according to the constitution.

The fight for menstrual hygiene is closely linked to Amjad, the founder of the Dastak Foundation, to her other passion, which is the fight against climate change. The extreme weather-related crisis, such as floods, that Pakistan has faced in recent times, she says, hit women particularly hard.

She recalls the trauma that many of the women she worked with described to her in the 2022 floods. She says, “Imagine you are sleeping in a tent and experiencing mahwari [menstruation] for the first time.” “You are not mentally prepared for it. You are attempting to save your life. You are not in charge of security or safety. That trauma is a trauma for life”.

Women will need to change sanitary pads more frequently during their periods, according to Amjad, and a lack of adequate access will become a bigger issue. She supports the elimination of taxes on cotton-based sanitary pads, but only those that are made of cotton rather than plastic ones, which “take thousands of years to decompose.”

Amjad is also campaigning for paid menstruation leave. She claims that “I’ve seen women who were fired because they couldn’t work because of their pain.” One area of your brain is engaged in menstruation, according to the saying. You can’t really focus properly”.

In the meantime, tax opponents hope that Omer’s petition will encourage Pakistan to impose itself on its own country, including India, Nepal, and the United Kingdom, which have all abolished their period taxes.

Omer struggled to accept that position in opposition to the government’s policies. Her parents, she says, were nervous at first about their daughter going to court against the government. She claims that taking on the state is never a wise decision.

They are now proud of her, she claims. “They understand why this matters”.