US wants to sell GM soya and corn to India, farmers wary

Indore, India: Madhya Pradesh, a soya bean farmer in the state of central India, has been disappointed by the state’s recently finished harvesting season.

The 57-year-old, who has more than 3 hectares (7.4 acres) of fertile land, claimed that excessive rain had caused his standing crops to be severely harmed the state’s soybean production.

Recommended Stories

list of 4 itemsend of list

According to Patel, “the production is only about 9, 000 kg,” or one-fifth of what it should be.

As a result of the excessive rain, corn prices, which are grown close to soya beans, have fallen.

Farmers like Patel should be concerned about more pressing issues.

One of the main components of the ongoing trade negotiations between India and the United States is that the two agricultural products are extensively grown for both livestock and human consumption.

President Donald Trump has so far imposed tariffs on India, which have threatened to destroy several US-based industries that are heavily exporting.

The US’s access to India’s agricultural sector is one of the issues in trade negotiations. Washington wants to see the introduction of genetically modified (GM) corn and soybeans on New Delhi’s market.

In order to introduce novel traits that increase production in comparison to conventional breeding, the GM technology involves changing plant DNA.

After Brazil, the US produces 119.05 million metric tons of soya beans, accounting for 28 percent of the world’s production.

Prior to the trade war with Beijing, China was the largest buyer of US soya beans.

Because China, the organization’s former top buyer, has dramatically reduced its purchases, Suman Sahai, the founder of Gene Campaign, a nonprofit working for farmers, said the US desperately needs a market for its soya beans and corn.

Trump must sell this crop of soybeans and corn to avoid piqueing the attention of his large-scale political base, she said.

[Gurvinder Singh/Al Jazeera] Soya farmer Mahesh Patel claims heavy rains destroyed his crop.

India’s resistance to change

India has so far stopped the importation of GM-variety soya beans and corn because it produces non-GM, organic crops that have a global niche market and could be hampered by the perception that GM varieties are causing the strain to become too diluted.

Madhya Pradesh alone produces more than half of the world’s 13.05 million tonnes of soya beans.

About 42 million tons of corn are produced in India, making about 80% of fuel-grade ethanol. Because of the lack of a processing facility for edible oil, the nation produces only corn on its own, but it imports soya oil for cooking purposes.

However, soya and corn farmers complain that traders are already charging less than the government’s recommended price. Additionally, the high prices of fertilizers, seeds, and other farm items are added to this, along with the unpredictable rainfall that has destroyed crops.

Because the government does not purchase from us, the traders can set the prices at their will. In Madhya Pradesh, corn farmer Prakash Patel, 50, said, “We are unable to even recover the production costs.”

We still have to pay the loans we used to purchase our farming equipment because the profit is a far-off dream.

Farmers worry that if US goods enter the Indian market, these losses will get worse.

In 0.40 hectares (1 acre) of land, a farmer in India typically produces about 1 metric tonne of soya beans. However, the same land area can support GM soybean production, according to Nirbhay Singh, a soya farmer in the state’s Piploda village.

Hemant Jain, an exporter of corn, is concerned about the impact of US goods entering India.

Because of their non-GM quality, Jain claimed that India’s soybean and corn products are in high demand internationally.

The import of GM products “would raise questions about adulteration in the minds of foreigners, who might be reluctant to purchase from us.”

Soybean India
According to experts, Indian growers cannot compete with US farmers who have sizable plots of land and substantial government subsidies.

Farmers in India, according to independent agrarian analyst Indra Shekhar Singh, have average landholdings of about 2 hectares (5 acres), where five to seven family members work and depend for food and income. They frequently have to work as laborers on other people’s land to earn more money.

This contrasts favorably with the US, where farmers have extensive fields to cultivate crops and, depending on the crop, receive substantial government subsidies.

Indian farmers can’t compete with the US government’s subordinated agri-commodities, saying that the US is trying to find a market alternative to China. Our farmers would be left deeply ill and helpless by them by the time they would have the entire market, Singh predicted.

Strong lobbying at work

However, some scientists and industry experts believe that India’s GM soybean and corn production has advantages.

Because they are not permitted to speak to the media, a senior scientist working with the Indian government on GM technology claimed that the introduction of the technology would allow farmers to use specific herbicides to control weeds without harming the crop.

The use of spraying insecticides and lower costs for farmers would be reduced thanks to the GM technology’s insect-resistant properties. Additionally, the GM method, which aids farmers in reducing their losses, significantly increases production.

According to Kawaljeet Bhatia, a 52-year-old Indian poultry feed supplier, the production of corn and soya beans will increase significantly with the introduction of GM varieties, which would benefit farmers and local businesses that are involved in the production process.

He suggested, however, that the government instead import GM seeds, producing their own.

“Some exporters, who claim to export organic products, pay a premium.” Because it benefits them, they want that status to continue. We only need to switch to GM in order to increase productivity, according to Bhatia.

Political analysts told Al Jazeera that the Indian government is being cautious. Agriculture accounts for 46% of the country’s GDP and contributes to it.

Sibaji Pratim Basu, an independent political commentator in Kolkata, West Bengal, quoted as saying, “The government is acting with caution, taking lessons from the massive farmers’ protest that had rocked the country in 2020-21. … referring to the yearlong protests by tens of thousands of farmers in northern India against three farm laws that the government has introduced. Only after the government withdrew those regulations did the protests come to an end.

Mexican Navy plane crashes off US coast, killing five

Russia-Ukraine war: List of key events, day 1,398

Trump unveils ‘Trump-class’ battleships for US Navy’s ‘Golden Fleet’

Donald Trump, president of the United States, announced plans to construct a new “Trump-class” of battleships, which he claimed would be bigger, faster, and 100 times more powerful than any other warships that had been built in the United States.

Trump stated at his Mar-a-Lago resort in Florida on Monday that the battleships would be a part of a larger plan to establish a “Golden Fleet” that would aid in maintaining US naval dominance.

Recommended Stories

list of 3 itemsend of list

The US president made the announcement while seated next to a rendering of the new ships, which appeared to have his emblazoned logo on them.

“We had large battleships,” he said. These are larger. There has never been anything like these ships, according to Trump, and they’ll have 100 times the force and power of the old ships.

He added that the ships would be “cutting edge” and equipped with the most recent technology, such as directed energy lasers and artificial intelligence. Additionally, they will have rail guns, nuclear cruise missiles, and hypersonic missiles, all of which the US Navy is working on at various stages.

He said, “Each of these will be the largest battleship in the history of our country, the largest battleship in the history of the world.”

Trump downplayed the notion that the new ships were intended to “counter any” allies, claiming that they were “a counter to everyone.”

Production would begin with two ships, according to the US president, but it could increase to 10, and to 25 over an undisclosed amount of time.

Trump claimed that the first ship would be named the USS Defiant and that “immediate work would begin” on the first two ships.

The new Trump-class warship is described as a spiritual successor to the battleships of the 20th century by both Trump and Navy Secretary John Phelan, but historically the term has only been used to refer to a very specific type of ship: a large, heavily armored, armed vessel designed to attack other ships or targets ashore.

The Iowa-class, the largest of the US battleships, was a sizeable 60 000 ton during World War II, when this type of ship gained notoriety. However, due to the rapid decline in the use of aircraft carriers and long-range missiles in contemporary fleets after World War II.

Trump made references to the documentary about naval warfare during the Second World War and the Great White Fleet, which was commissioned by former US President Theodore Roosevelt in the early 20th century.

“Victory at Sea,” . Victory at Sea was a classic, he said, adding that the new ships would “maintain American military supremacy”.

This new “guided missile battleship” is expected to be roughly the same size as battleships from the Iowa-class, but it will have much smaller crews, between 650 and 850 sailors, and be about the same size as those from the newly developed Golden Fleet website.

Its main weaponry will be missiles, not large naval guns, either.

Trump claimed that the naval expansion would coincide with renewed pressure on defense contractors to reduce costs and speed up production.

He stated that he will meet with major defense companies the following week to discuss delays and overruns and to assess whether executive compensation, stock buybacks, and dividends are preventing production targets.

‘We have to have it’: Trump renews push for Greenland as Denmark protests

Brooklyn Beckham pals lift the lid on ‘great shame’ amid young star’s latest snub

When Gordon Ramsay’s children, Jack and Holly, were younger, Brooklyn Beckham and Gordon Ramsay were close friends because of how they both handled the ups and downs of being the offspring of famous people.

Brooklyn Beckham will not be present at Holly Ramsay and Adam Peaty’s wedding on Christmas Day, it is reported.

The aspiring chef’s absence from the ceremony in Bath, Somerset, as described as a “great shame” because he was close to Holly and her twin brother Jack growing up. The three young people went through the ups and downs of being the offspring of famous people.

David and Victoria Beckham will be at the wedding with their three three children, Romeo, Cruz and Harper, but Brooklyn, 26, is expected to spend the festive period in the US with his wife Nicola Peltz and her family.

According to a source, David and Victoria consider Tana and Gordon to be close to family. The children all had a common ancestor. Although Brooklyn has always loved spending time with them, his and Jack’s friendship hasn’t really developed, which is unfortunate because Gordon and Tana have both expressed anger over the breakup. They adore Brooklyn a lot. Since he was a baby, they have known him.

READ MORE: Brooklyn and Nicola’s ‘hidden plot to silence Beckhams after cut-throat warning’READ MORE: Brooklyn Beckham feud with family in full as brother claims they’ve been blocked

Brooklyn, according to sources close to the wedding, “will of course be missed,” according to sources familiar with the ceremony. They will avoid a awkward encounter with David and Victoria because he is spending Christmas at the in-laws’ Palm Beach mansion.

The family row hit an all-time low this week when Brooklyn has blocked his whole family on Instagram, including his 14-year-old sister Harper who has seemingly been caught in the crossfire.

Brooklyn has aggressively distanced himself from his entire family over the past year, preferring to spend time with Nicola’s parents over his own. He missed significant milestones like his dad’s 50th birthday celebrations and his knighthood.

Speaking to the Daily Mail, the insider added: “Should Brooklyn have been there (at Holly and Adam’s wedding), there would have been quite the scene, what with his parent being there… Brooklyn doesn’t appear to see many of his friends he hung out with before Nicola any more and that is very sad. These are people who he goes way back with and Holly is one of them.”

It is reported David and Victoria see Brooklyn’s move as a sign of “complete estrangement”. Despite the feud, both sides had – until the weekend – continued to keep relations friendly on Instagram, where their lives are played out in a never-ending stream of posts and short-form videos.

It then emerged Brooklyn, who is a former model, asked his parents to “back off” in order to give he and Nicola “peace at Christmas”. It is thought the couple want David and Victoria “to leave them alone” during the holiday season.

Continue reading the article.