England dealt first World Cup defeat by Australia

JavaScript must be enabled in your browser to play this video.

  • 676 Comments

Indore, ICC Women’s World Cup

England 244-9 (50 overs): Beaumont 78 (105), Sutherland 3-60

Australia 248-4 (40.3 overs): Gardner 104* (73), Sutherland 98* (112), Smith 2-43

By six wickets, Australia won.

In Indore, England lost their first match of the Women’s World Cup against the formidable defending champions Australia, who were six wickets away.

With 9.3 overs to spare, Australia experienced a top-order slump, falling to 24-3 and 68-4 before making a flawless 180-over-a-series partnership with Annabel Sutherland and Ash Gardner.

As Australia’s astonishing batting depth again rose, Sutherland, who also took three wickets in England’s 244-9, came in with 98, and Gardner, who also took three wickets, recorded a sensational 104 from 73 balls.

As England overcame an uncharacteristically sloppy start from the Australian bowlers, adding 55 in eight overs, the openers Tammy Beaumont and Amy Jones both had their moments.

However, Jones’ dismissal, which was assisted by a Sutherland beauty, put the brakes on.

With a top score of 78, Beaumont was in much-needed form, but leg-spinner Alana King, who took 1-20 in 10 overs, caused the middle order to come to a standstill.

Heather Knight and Nat Sciver-Brunt, England’s middle-order glue, were only successful on 20 and seven balls, respectively, while Emma Lamb struggled to reach six and remained unbeaten.

With the help of Alice Capsey, Charlie Dean once more added a valuable stand of 61 from 52 balls, but the total was still significantly below par in the face of such a stellar batting line-up.

Before scurrying through the gears to punish an England bowling attack without any options, neither of whom had a chance in a masterclass of one-day batting, the pair cautiously rebuilt the innings before racing through the gears.

    • two hours ago

Gardner once more delivers

JavaScript must be enabled in your browser to play this video.

Australia have faced a few batting issues so far in the competition, most notably with their top-order performances against Pakistan and New Zealand, but what makes them so admirable is that they will always step up when others fall short.

Sutherland’s previous appearances with the bat were five, one, and nought despite her bowling prowess, but she did so this time with the bat and showed incredible composure.

England made a fantastic start, with Lauren Bell striking out to beat Phoebe Litchfield in the opening over, Georgia Voll swiping over Linsey Smith, and Ellyse Perry returning to the same bowler for 13 more.

Sutherland steadied the ship first with the left-handed Beth Mooney, before Sciver-Brunt brilliantly caught the former at midwicket off Sophie Ecclestone to restore momentum to England.

England didn’t even get a taste of it there. With a fifty from 66 balls, Sutherland found the perfect match for Gardner’s counter-attack.

As they searched for wickets that would start to leak runs at a canter, England’s heads sank in the face of such a class. Gardner’s second century of the tournament came from 69 balls, making the matchup between the two all-rounders to see who could win first.

JavaScript must be enabled in your browser to play this video.

England is stifled by Sutherland and the King.

After England were hit by a 16-0 thrashing defeat at the start of the year, the eagerly awaited Ashes reunion came back on track, having previously been unbeaten and greatly improved by a big win over India in their previous match.

An England side that might have put the pain behind them and had the ability to launch the attack at their best was a good sight from the start.

Megan Schutt and Kim Garth were sloppy, bowling extremely full, and looking for a swing that wasn’t available, and Beaumont and Jones capitalized by finding the boundary with ease square of the ground.

After a difficult start to the tournament, both openers have a half-century to go in consecutive matches. Beaumont’s was rewarded for doing this with a boundary-bound fifty, which she faced with 39 dots.

Sutherland, the world’s best wicket-taker, took out Jones’ off-spin for 18 and turned the tables on him, turning the tables.

England’s Ashes nemesis King was then unplayable once more. England were very passive against her, unable to find ways to turn the strike around and put pressure back on, despite the fact that she had 41 dot balls in her 10-over spell and found an incredible 4.7 degrees of spin.

As Australia gradually lost their discipline, Capsey and Dean took the lead with 76 runs in the final 10 overs, but England only added 26 runs as a result of the play between 21 and 30.

JavaScript must be enabled in your browser to play this video.

related subjects

  • Women’s Cricket Team of England
  • Cricket

More on this story.

    • August 16

ICJ says Israel must allow aid into blockaded Gaza, provide ‘basic needs’

The United Nations court, the International Court of Justice (ICJ), has said Israel has an obligation to ensure the “basic needs” of the population in Gaza are met.

The panel of 11 judges said on Wednesday that Israel is forced to support the relief efforts provided by the United Nations in the bombarded Gaza Strip and its entities.

Recommended Stories

list of 3 itemsend of list

It includes UNRWA, the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East, which Israel has banned from operating in Israel after accusing some of its staff of taking part in the October 7, 2023, Hamas-led attack.

As part of its findings, the ICJ said Israel has failed to show evidence that UNRWA also worked for Hamas as it claimed.

“The court finds that Israel has not substantiated its allegations that a significant part of UNRWA’s employees are ‘ members of Hamas … or other terrorist factions'”, said ICJ President Yuji Iwasawa.

Advisory opinions of the ICJ, also known as the world court, carry legal and political weight, but they are not binding, and the court has no enforcement power.

In April, lawyers for the United Nations and Palestinian representatives at the ICJ accused Israel of breaking international law by refusing to let aid into Gaza between March and May.

Since then, some humanitarian aid has been allowed in, but UN officials say the relief is nowhere near what is needed to ease a humanitarian disaster and an Israeli-induced famine in parts of the enclave.

The 20-point ceasefire plan mediated by the US earlier this month allows for 600 trucks of aid a day into Gaza. Israel has previously accused Hamas – without providing evidence – of stealing food delivered into the enclave, which the group strongly denies.

Israel has claimed the aid restriction, still in place despite provisions in the ceasefire stipulating that aid must enter Gaza at scale, was to put pressure on the group.

Israel’s ambassador to the UN, Danny Danon, slammed the ICJ’s advisory opinion as “shameful”, claiming UN institutions are “breeding grounds for terrorists”.

Israel did not take part in the proceedings, but it did submit its legal position in writing. In April, Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Saar dismissed the hearings as a “circus” and said the court was being politicised.

Iwasawa said the court “rejects the argument that the request abuses and weaponises the international judicial process”.

Advisory ‘ very important ‘

On the eve of the ICJ ruling, Abeer Etefa, Middle East spokesperson for the UN’s World Food Programme (WFP), said 530 of the organisation’s trucks had crossed into Gaza since the ceasefire.

Those trucks had delivered more than 6, 700 tonnes of food, which she said was “enough for close to half a million people for two weeks”.

Etefa said about 750 tonnes a day were now coming through, which, although more than before the ceasefire, remains well below WFP’s target of about 2, 000 tonnes daily.

The ICJ said that Israel, as an occupying power, was under an obligation “to ensure the basic needs of the local population, including the supplies essential for their survival”.

At the same time, Israel was “also under a negative obligation not to impede the provision of these supplies”, the court said.

The court also recalled the obligation under international law not to use starvation as a method of warfare.

Al Jazeera’s Step Vaessen, reporting from The Hague, said the advisory opinion is still seen as “very important” because the ICJ is the primary legal body of the UN.

“Even if Israel ignores it, as it’s done time and time again, all the UN countries are obliged to follow up on this court’s advice”, Vaessen said. “Even if Israel is ignoring it now, it will hang over the head of Israel from this moment on”.

The UN General Assembly had asked the ICJ to clarify Israel’s obligations, as an occupying power, towards the UN and other bodies, “including to ensure and facilitate the unhindered provision of urgently needed supplies essential to the survival” of Palestinians.

ICJ judges heard a week of evidence in April from dozens of nations and organisations, much of which revolved around the status of UNRWA.

The ICJ at the time noted that UNRWA “cannot be replaced on short notice without a proper transition plan”.

Palestinian official Ammar Hijazi told the ICJ judges during the April hearings that Israel was blocking aid as a “weapon of war” and triggering starvation in Gaza.

Wednesday’s case was separate from the others Israel faces under international law over its assault in Gaza.

In July 2024, the ICJ issued another advisory opinion stating that Israel’s occupation of the Palestinian territory was “unlawful” and must end as soon as possible.

‘The perfect time to call it a night’ – Scarratt retires on own terms

JavaScript must be enabled in your browser to play this video.

  • 46 Comments

Emily Scarratt, the great England player, claims she could have played more of her career after 17 years in the Tests.

The 35-year-old told Rugby Union Weekly, “I probably could have done a little more, but I don’t think I needed to.” That’s why it feels appropriate,” he said.

The ideal moment to end it is “the night.” I’ve had a wonderful time, I’m in a good mood, and I’m free to make this choice.

Scarratt, who made the announcement to stop playing on Tuesday, acknowledged that it was difficult to step down.

She continued, “I have been overwhelmed and probably a little unsure about how I feel.”

It’s been in my head for a while, but it’s just one thing thinking about it, another making a decision, and finally a third saying it’s true without anyone realizing it.

“I have had some lovely messages that have tipped me over the edge a little bit with people saying some nice things,” I said, “The bit coming back at you is the bit I struggle with.”

I’ve loved the game for so long and given it so much, but in retrospect, I’m proud and eager to play the next level as well.

On her England debut against the United States in August 2008, an 18-year-old Scarratt scored a try off the bench. She had the opportunity to play for the country a few months earlier, but she chose to concentrate on her A-Levels rather than travel on a summer tour.

She was named World Player of the Year in 2019 and has since scored 754 points, which is an all-time Red Roses record.

Getty Images

Scarratt says she feels her role on the sidelines and in the camp was just as significant as her more glaring involvement in four previous World Cups, despite that it was her only game time of the campaign.

I genuinely really enjoyed the entire tournament because I want to play rugby and am a rugby player, but this one was a little different and my role wasn’t likely to be at the forefront of the action, she said.

I’ve always tried to be a team player, but I always felt like I was just starting over a long period of my career, so I find it much more difficult to do so.

“But it has always been very important to me to be able to demonstrate that the entire team, regardless of what position you hold in that), is strong.”

Scarratt frequently carried the Red Roses’ water bottles as they rolled to victory, leaving the matchday squad.

In front of 81,885 spectators in front of England’s triumphant victory in the World Cup, she played the role for the final.

She recalls that she was meticulous about following the clock and performing my duties until about 30 seconds later when she was on the radio.

“I looked up to the coaches’ boxes and probably said a few things, “We’re world champions.”

It was unbelievable how that feeling felt inside that stadium. Because I didn’t see it happening in our game, I never imagined that would happen to me.

I was very glassy-eyed at the conclusion because I knew it was going to be the end [for me] as well as to be successful in front of that many people.

Following England’s victory, it was reported that R360, a proposed new global series featuring top players, had contacted England stars to hire them as figurehead signings for the inaugural 2026 edition.

Any R360 players who do not represent their national teams were then prohibited by the Rugby Football Union in collaboration with other leading nations.

I’m not sure if I should be offended, but I was never asked to participate in it! Scarratt made fun of himself.

We are constantly looking for investment and financial support, even though the women’s game is theoretically slightly different from the men’s game.

Players will have to make the decision between choosing to invest in international assets or the lure of potential money. I’d like for it to all have a home.

related subjects

  • Rugby Union

More on this story.

‘Perfect time to call it a night’ – Scarratt retires on own terms

JavaScript must be enabled in your browser to play this video.

  • 63 Comments

Emily Scarratt, the great England player, claims she could have played more of her career after 17 years in the Tests.

The 35-year-old told Rugby Union Weekly, “I probably could have done a little more, but I don’t think I needed to.” That’s why it feels appropriate,” he said.

The ideal moment to end it is “the night.” I’ve had a wonderful time, I’m in a good mood, and I’m free to make this choice.

Scarratt, who made the announcement to stop playing on Tuesday, acknowledged that it was difficult to step down.

She continued, “I have been overwhelmed and probably a little unsure about how I feel.”

It’s been in my head for a while, but it’s just one thing thinking about it, another making a decision, and finally a third saying it’s true without anyone realizing it.

“I have had some lovely messages that have tipped me over the edge a little bit with people saying some nice things,” I said, “The bit coming back at you is the bit I struggle with.”

I’ve loved the game for so long and given it so much, but in retrospect, I’m proud and eager to play the next level as well.

On her England debut against the United States in August 2008, an 18-year-old Scarratt scored a try off the bench. She had the opportunity to play for the country a few months earlier, but she chose to concentrate on her A-Levels rather than travel on a summer tour.

She was named World Player of the Year in 2019 and has since scored 754 points, which is an all-time Red Roses record.

Getty Images

Scarratt says she feels her role on the sidelines and in the camp was just as significant as her more glaring involvement in four previous World Cups, despite that it was her only game time of the campaign.

I genuinely really enjoyed the entire tournament because I want to play rugby and am a rugby player, but this one was a little different and my role wasn’t likely to be at the forefront of the action, she said.

I’ve always tried to be a team player, but I always felt like I was just starting over a long period of my career, so I find it much more difficult to do so.

“But it has always been very important to me to be able to demonstrate that the entire team, regardless of what position you hold in that), is strong.”

Scarratt frequently carried the Red Roses’ water bottles as they rolled to victory, leaving the matchday squad.

In front of 81,885 spectators in front of England’s triumphant victory in the World Cup, she played the role for the final.

She recalls that she was meticulous about following the clock and performing my duties until about 30 seconds later when she was on the radio.

“I looked up to the coaches’ boxes and probably said a few things, “We’re world champions.”

It was unbelievable how that feeling felt inside that stadium. Because I didn’t see it happening in our game, I never imagined that would happen to me.

I was very glassy-eyed at the conclusion because I knew it was going to be the end [for me] as well as to be successful in front of that many people.

Following England’s victory, it was reported that R360, a proposed new global series featuring top players, had contacted England stars to hire them as figurehead signings for the inaugural 2026 edition.

Any R360 players who do not represent their national teams were then prohibited by the Rugby Football Union in collaboration with other leading nations.

I’m not sure if I should be offended, but I was never asked to participate in it! Scarratt made fun of himself.

We are constantly looking for investment and financial support, even though the women’s game is theoretically slightly different from the men’s game.

Players will have to make the decision between choosing to invest in international assets or the lure of potential money. I’d like for it to all have a home.

related subjects

  • Rugby Union

More on this story.