EU hits Musk’s X with $140m fine for ‘deceptive’ blue tick, ad transparency

Elon Musk’s social media platform X received a 120 million euro ($140 million) fine from the European Union for breaking digital transparency regulations, igniting a transatlantic dispute over tech regulation.

Brussels’ first enforcement action under the Digital Services Act, which was intended to halt social media companies, was on Friday.

Recommended Stories

list of 2 itemsend of list

Washington has grown in resentment over the decision, where officials claimed that Europe targeted US businesses under the pretense of defending users.

Following a two-year investigation, European regulators found X guilty of three violations. The platform’s paid blue checkmark system, which Brussels claimed “deceives users” about account authenticity, was fined 45 million euros ($52.4).

For failing to keep up transparent advertising records that would enable legitimate political advertisements, X was fined another 35 million euros ($40.7 million) while preventing researchers from accessing public data cost the business 40 million euros ($46.6 million).

The decision could stifle Brussels and Washington’s trade talks, which the Trump administration has demanded Europe halt because it views protectionist regulations.

Even prior to the announcement, US Vice President JD Vance criticized Brussels, claiming that the platform was being punished “for not engaging in censorship.”

Foreign governments’ attacks on all American tech platforms and the American people, according to Secretary of State Marco Rubio.

Musk wrote, “Absolutely,” in response to Rubio’s post. Musk wrote: “Bulls******” while commenting on the EU’s post announcing the fine.

Henna Virkkunen, the head of EU technology, disputed that the ruling constituted censorship.

She claimed that Brussels was simply “holding X responsible for undermining users’ rights” and that misleading users with blue checkmarks, obscured information on ads, and shutting out researchers had no place online.

After what many perceived as protracted delays in enforcement, European politicians expressed relief.

German Digital Minister Karsten Wildberger claimed it demonstrated that Brussels was “determined to enforce” its rules, while French Digital Minister Anne Le Henanff referred to it as a “magnificent announcement.”

The penalty was criticized as too modest.

The act, which imposes sanctions on up to 6% of global revenue, allows for a fraction of the 5.9 billion euro ($6.9 billion) cap.

According to Politico, the Future of Technology Institute’s executive director Cori Crider reportedly said, “Musk will moan in public … in private, he will be doing cartwheels.”

X now has 60 to 90 days to submit compliance plans for the violations, or it could be subject to additional, recurring fines.

The Reuters news agency contacted the company about commenting, but the company declined.

In addition to Facebook and Instagram, the ruling comes amid broader inquiries into 10 major platforms.

TikTok, a Chinese company, pledged to increase its level of transparency in its advertising, and avoided penalties on Friday.

House of Games fans left fuming as BBC show hit with major schedule shake-up

As BBC Two switched the popular quiz show’s schedule from 6 p.m. to 7 p.m. for World Cup coverage, Richard Osman’s House of Games viewers were furious.

After House of Games was moved to a different time slot this evening, Telly viewers were left enthralled.

The popular quiz show typically broadcasts on BBC Two from Monday to Friday at 6pm, but tonight’s episode was pushed back due to the World Cup Draw coverage.

One person expressed frustration on social media by saying, “Can’t believe I’m having to go without House of Games for this s***” when it became public that fans would have to wait until 7:30pm on Friday evening.

Another yelled, “Where is House of Games?” and said, “Never mind the football.” At six, a third chimed in, “I turned over to BBC2 to watch House of Games.” Very disappointed to see this garbage. Someone else yelled, “Pee’d off that House of Games will be an hour late.”

Four celebrities vie for daily prizes on the Richard Osman-fronted program for five consecutive days.

Scores accumulate throughout the week before an overall winner is announced on Friday, as each episode culminates with a rapid-fire round that determines the daily winner.

Points are awarded based on each celebrity’s finishing position daily, with Friday’s totals receiving double points. This week’s celebrity contestants include Giovanna Fletcher, Montell Douglas, Will Bayley and Josh Pugh.

Host Richard previously revealed how his “family of quizzers” background has helped him succeed in his career. He stated in a statement to the Guardian that while I’m a fairly good quizzer, I’m not really helping because I come from a family of fairly good ones.

You want to compete with someone who is almost as clever as you, which is what I always find to be true. Someone you can only win against about 52% of the time, so you’ll always have a good time. However, you should always be successful if you play at your best.

Just last week, Richard revealed that he would only agree to be on Celebrity Traitors if producers gave him the option to play a traitor rather than a faithful. Richard, who turns 55 on November 28th, revealed to The Chipping Forecast podcast that he had been approached about joining the BBC program that attracted viewers and saw the victory of one of the traitors, Alan Carr.

When asked if Richard could participate in the upcoming series, Richard responded, “I said to them, they did ask, and I said I could only do it as a traitor.”

Richard said his decision was motivated by concerns about how he would react when contestants attempt to identify each other’s roles during roundtable discussions, according to the Express.

Richard went on to say that if someone accused me of being a traitor and I am one of them, then I don’t mind, and I’ll fight for myself because that’s the only reason I could do it as a traitor, as he said. I would lose my mind if someone came up to me and said I was a traitor, even though I was faithful. Sincerely, I wouldn’t be able to deal with it in any way.

Continue reading the article.

“I simply couldn’t because it would make me insane just by the injustice it caused.” They can’t guarantee that, so I don’t believe I could do it unless I could be a traitor.

House of Games fans left fuming as BBC show hit with major schedule shake-up

As BBC Two switched the popular quiz show’s schedule from 6 p.m. to 7 p.m. for World Cup coverage, Richard Osman’s House of Games viewers were furious.

After House of Games was moved to a different time slot this evening, Telly viewers were left enthralled.

The popular quiz show typically broadcasts on BBC Two from Monday to Friday at 6pm, but tonight’s episode was pushed back due to the World Cup Draw coverage.

One person expressed frustration on social media by saying, “Can’t believe I’m having to go without House of Games for this s***” when it became public that fans would have to wait until 7:30pm on Friday evening.

Another yelled, “Where is House of Games?” and said, “Never mind the football.” At six, a third chimed in, “I turned over to BBC2 to watch House of Games.” Very disappointed to see this garbage. Someone else yelled, “Pee’d off that House of Games will be an hour late.”

Four celebrities vie for daily prizes on the Richard Osman-fronted program for five consecutive days.

Scores accumulate throughout the week before an overall winner is announced on Friday, as each episode culminates with a rapid-fire round that determines the daily winner.

Points are awarded based on each celebrity’s finishing position daily, with Friday’s totals receiving double points. This week’s celebrity contestants include Giovanna Fletcher, Montell Douglas, Will Bayley and Josh Pugh.

Host Richard previously revealed how his “family of quizzers” background has helped him succeed in his career. He stated in a statement to the Guardian that while I’m a fairly good quizzer, I’m not really helping because I come from a family of fairly good ones.

You want to compete with someone who is almost as clever as you, which is what I always find to be true. Someone you can only win against about 52% of the time, so you’ll always have a good time. However, you should always be successful if you play at your best.

Just last week, Richard revealed that he would only agree to be on Celebrity Traitors if producers gave him the option to play a traitor rather than a faithful. Richard, who turns 55 on November 28th, revealed to The Chipping Forecast podcast that he had been approached about joining the BBC program that attracted viewers and saw the victory of one of the traitors, Alan Carr.

When asked if Richard could participate in the upcoming series, Richard responded, “I said to them, they did ask, and I said I could only do it as a traitor.”

Richard said his decision was motivated by concerns about how he would react when contestants attempt to identify each other’s roles during roundtable discussions, according to the Express.

Richard went on to say that if someone accused me of being a traitor and I am one of them, then I don’t mind, and I’ll fight for myself because that’s the only reason I could do it as a traitor, as he said. I would lose my mind if someone came up to me and said I was a traitor, even though I was faithful. Sincerely, I wouldn’t be able to deal with it in any way.

Continue reading the article.

“I simply couldn’t because it would make me insane just by the injustice it caused.” They can’t guarantee that, so I don’t believe I could do it unless I could be a traitor.