Fans, Fosun and future – what next for struggling Wolves?

Images courtesy of Getty
  • 12 Comments

Fosun may be celebrating his tenth year in charge of Wolves in the Championship.

Bottom of the Premier League, nine wins short of winning in their first nine games and six points clear of safety.

Since losing six games in the top flight, they travel to Fulham on Saturday, when three desperately needed points would equal the 10-game start without success last season.

Fans sang “sacked in the morning” during Sunday’s home defeat against Burnley, the first time the former Porto manager had turned on him since he led them to safety last season, just 39 days after Pereira signed a new three-year contract.

Owners Fosun and executive chairman Jeff Shi are their main targets, but he is not one of them, and he urged them to stay together as they fought over a heated topic with supporters in the South Bank.

Ironically Wolves are in the “happy” basket along with other businesses like pram manufacturer Silver Cross and fashion brand Tom Taylor, which is split into health, wealth, and happiness.

Wolves are only a small portion of the larger picture, with their pharmaceutical companies producing cancer medications and the majority of their assets located outside of China.

Do Fosun’s plans and plans include selling?

Wolves remain the only English club still under Chinese ownership, and Fosun do not want to relinquish control.

Selling the club is not something the business are actively thinking about, even if they enter the Championship for the first time since 2018.

It is understood that selling a Championship asset would naturally result in a decline in value and that relegation would not have an impact on Fosun’s commitment and the level of backing would remain the same.

Any ideas they might have about the club would receive swift rebukes.

Since taking over, Fosun has reportedly lost between £250 million and £300 million in transfers and running costs. The club is expected to be valued at around £500 million.

John Textor, who previously offered to invest in Wolves’ executive chairman Shi, is interested in this.

The former co-owner of Crystal Palace, the American businessman, has the opportunity to return, and Wolves is open to further discussions, but Molineux is skeptical that it will lead to anything more concrete.

Sources suggest Textor’s initial offer was unfavorable, and he must now have the ball in his hands if he wants to return to the table.

The ownership of Wolves seeking investment is not new; in 2019 Fosun plans to sell a 20% stake worth between £50 million and £100 million.

Since then, minority stakes have fluctuated.

JavaScript must be enabled in your browser to play this video.

Fans have been vocal and obvious about Shi and the ownership, and those in charge are aware that it is nearly impossible to change their opinion once it has changed.

Before Wolves came back from 2-0 down to equalize with a last-minute winner against Burnley, supporters broke during the first half.

One of the chants read, “You’ve sold the team, now sell the club,” and Shi received more resentment.

It would be wrong for Fosun to ignore pure fan pressure, but they would also be wrong not to listen.

The owners have looked to cut spending in recent years after purchasing Wolves for £45 million in 2016 and making a commitment to invest between £20 million and £30 million in the first two years of ownership.

Shi claimed six years ago that it was crucial not to be completely dependent on Fosun, but they never completely raised the financial drawbridge.

Given that there have been numerous successful spending sprees, it was wise to reduce the spending and wage bill.

Matheus Nunes left Sporting for £38 million, despite being flattered before making a £53 million move to Manchester City two years ago, while Matheus Cunha’s £43 million move from Atletico Madrid is still a club record.

However, the highest summer signings for versatile midfielder Ladislav Krecji and Jorgen Strand Larsen’s £23 million move from Celta Vigo and the £26 million commitment to his versatility were made in a more conservative transfer plan.

Nelson Semedo, Raul Jimenez, and Joao Moutinho all received salaries of over £100,000 per week, while Pablo Sarabia, who was one of the club’s highest earners, joined Julen Lopetegui in 2023 as one of their highest earners but was unable to maintain a regular place before he left in June, saw the club burn.

Fosun wants a sustainable model, and Wolves have previously overpaid. The hard work is then finding better players for better prices after there is a direct correlation between wage budget and league position.

After a lavish investment, they will spend again in January, though not significantly, and the squad’s evolution is viewed as a new cycle.

Domenico Teti, a former employee of Al-Shabab in Saudi Arabia, took over as sporting director in the summer of 2016.

What is Pereira’s position like?

Vitor Pereira Images courtesy of Getty

Pereira’s dismissal is a major reluctance.

Wolves are looking for consistency after losing to Lopetegui in his 2022 arrival after four managers in the previous four years, five if you add Steve Davis’ eight-game interim tenure.

Although the struggles cannot continue indefinitely, Pereira maintains the board’s and players’ faith ahead of the trip to Craven Cottage.

Wolves are not ready to fire Pereira despite having an ulterior motive and holding onto O’Neil for too long, which has been accepted.

The 57-year-old won their best top-flight run since 1970, winning six games straight between March and April, and will have more time to resurrect their fortunes.

He expressed disappointment that players who had lost valuable Premier League experience with Rayan Ait-Nouri, Semedo, and Cunha’s departures, which also resulted in a 15-goal squad gap, arrived late in the window.

With the addition of more homegrown players, Wolves will have to choose a new direction because none of the five new senior signings had prior league experience.

Pereira has made an effort to understand the city and its fans, drinking with them after winning last year and coining the adage, “first the points, then the pints,” and misses the friendship he shared last year.

However, only victories can bring about reconciliation.

He said, “Of course,” about missing the pub trips on Friday. I enjoy going to the pub to drink my beer when I’m happy. I stay at home and look for solutions if I’m unhappy.

My goal is to find solutions every day to ensure that my team, my players, and the club’s members are doing the same.

related subjects

  • Premier League
  • Football
  • Wolverhampton Wanderers

US courts rule Trump cannot suspend food aid during government shutdown

A government shutdown that drags on will require the administration of President Donald Trump to halt food assistance to low-income people, according to two federal judges in the country.

Both of Friday’s decisions, which were made within minutes, concerned the SNAP Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program’s fate.

Recommended Stories

list of 3 itemsend of list

One in eight US citizens, or 42 million people, rely on SNAP to provide for their households. On Saturday, that assistance was scheduled to come to an end.

Since Congress was unable to pass a budget bill in September, the Trump administration has argued that neither it can continue to fund the program nor use emergency funds to cover the shortfall.

However, that logic was thrown into question by both of Friday’s rulings.

US District Judge Indira Talwani in Boston made the first decision, setting a Monday deadline for the Trump administration to address how, at least partially, SNAP could be funded. She argued that suspending the program completely was “unlawful.”

She also ruled that, as the government has done previously, it was acceptable to use government contingency funds to pay for SNAP.

According to Indira, “Defendants’ suspension of SNAP payments was based on the erroneous conclusion that the Contingency Funds could not be used to ensure the continuation of SNAP payments.”

The defendants are now required to use those contingency funds as required by the SNAP program, according to this court.

The District of Columbia and 25 Democrat-led states filed petitions challenging the federal government’s claim that it had the power to halt the food assistance program entirely.

US District Judge John McConnell’s Rhode Island court rendered the second decision.

Trump’s SNAP benefits suspension there was challenged by a group of cities, nonprofits, and labor organizations. McConnell and his Boston colleague both reached the same conclusions in their responses.

There is no denying that irreparable harm will begin to occur if it hasn’t already occurred in the terror that some people have experienced because of the availability of food and support for their families, according to McConnell during a virtual hearing.

He demanded an update from the administration on Monday and demanded that the government continue funding SNAP.

Never has SNAP been threatened before by the Trump administration.

Both plaintiffs claimed that the Trump administration’s actions appeared to be attempts to use food aid as political leverage.

Additionally, they made a point of mentioning that the US Department of Agriculture (USDA) had stated that it would use emergency funds to keep SNAP benefits while the government was in session.

However, the Trump administration changed its tune on October 26 by putting a message on the USDA website.

The message read, “Bottom line, the well has run dry.” There won’t be any benefits effective as of November 1 at this time.

The USDA has “necessary” use of at least $5.25 billion in contingency funds to continue providing benefits, which Congress previously allocated for use when “necessary to carry out program operations.”

The Trump administration has pledged to use the situation to reduce government employment and programs it views unfavorably, despite previous government shutdowns that have caused delays and interruptions to government services.

The shutdown is currently past its 31st day. Republicans and Democrats continue to debate the budget bill’s passage in an effort to keep the federal government open.

Republicans have veered off on the issue until a continuing resolution that keeps federal spending at its current level is passed, while Democrats want to make sure healthcare issues are addressed in the legislation.

On Friday, senior Trump officials vowed to keep their grip on the SNAP contingency funds.

According to Secretary of Agriculture Brooke Rollins, “contingency funds can only flow when the underlying fund is flowing,” she said to reporters.

Guinea-Bissau arrests senior army officers for alleged coup attempt

Arcade Fire married stars split after 22 years and historic misconduct claims

Two rock stars from the same band have confirmed their union after 22 years of marriage by confirming that they will continue to play the same song just months after releasing new music.

After 22 years of dating, a member of a massive indie rock band split up. On their band’s social media page, they made the announcement in a joint post.

Arcade Fire’s Win Butler and Regine Chassagne married in 2003 but confirmed their split in a shock post on social media. The statement said: “After a long and loving marriage, Win & Regine have decided to separate.

As they co-parent their son, they continue to love, admire, and support one another. They “added their” bond to Arcade Fire and their “creative soulmates will endure.” The band “send their love and look forward to seeing you all on tour soon,” they continued.

READ MORE: I’m A Celebrity star quits boyband tour after going missing from first reunion showREAD MORE: David Harbour’s ex throws support behind Lily Allen after brutal revelations in album

Four people allegedly made allegations of misconduct against Win, 45, three years ago. The allegations made by three women and a gender-neutral individual included physical assault, emotional abuse, and unsolicited explicit messages.

The musician insisted that the negotiations were peaceful and that they were ongoing. Although these relationships were all mutual, Win said in a statement from 2022, “I’m sorry to anyone who I have hurt with my behavior.

“My son can be proud of how I continue to learn from my mistakes and work hard to become a better person as I look to the future,” my son said. ]…]

I regret not being more aware and tuned in to the impact I had on other people. I f**ked up, and I’m not looking for an excuse. I’ll continue to look forward, heal what can be healed, and draw lessons from our past experiences.

In spite of the allegations, Regine supported her husband, who had a son with Win in 2013. She said at the time, “I know what’s in his heart, and I know he’s never touched a woman without her consent, and I’m certain he never did.”

He has found his way back and lost his way. I cherish the life we have created together, and I cherish him. Arcade Fire won ten Grammy Awards in the 2000s and rose to fame.

They have performed on huge stages across the world including Glastonbury, Coachella and Lollapalooza. The band returned this year with new album Pink Elephant, which was their first since Will Butler left the band in 2022.

Will, the brother of frontman Win, said on social media that he left at the end of last year after the new record [WE] was set. There was no compelling reason to believe that I had changed over the course of almost 20 years and that the band had. It’s time for some new things.

Continue reading the article.

“Thank you to everyone who has attended AF shows, purchased a record, or loves our music,” he continued. It has significance for your life.

Thank you to the team, staff, management, label employees, bands, artists, and friends who have contributed to our vision being realized for so long. My friends and family are still with the band. I’ll be by! I’ll see you around!

READ MORE: Vet warning to pet owners to do one thing this winter to avoid ‘dangerous’ risk