Category News

A federal officer in the United States has shot a Venezuelan man in the leg in Minneapolis, Minnesota. Officials say officers had tried to stop a car to arrest the man and opened fire after two people attacked one of them with a “snow shovel and broom handle”.

Protests broke out in the city after the incident.

Wednesday’s shooting comes exactly a week after a US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officer shot and killed local resident Renee Nicole Good in her car in Minneapolis during an immigration raid.

What happened?

In an X post on Wednesday, the US Department of Homeland Security (DHS) wrote that at 6:50pm (00:50 GMT on Thursday), federal law enforcement officers were stopping “an illegal alien from Venezuela who was released into the country by [former President] Joe Biden in 2022”.

The DHS added that the man had tried to evade the officers, crashing his car into another parked car and then fleeing on foot. It said one of the officers caught up with the immigrant on foot “when the subject began to resist and violently assault the officer”.

The department’s post said that while the immigrant and the officer were struggling on the ground, two people came out of a nearby apartment and began to strike the officer with a snow shovel and a broomstick. It further said, “The original subject got loose and began striking the officer with a shovel or broom stick.”

“Fearing for his life and safety as he was being ambushed by three individuals, the officer fired a defensive shot to defend his life. The initial subject was hit in the leg,” the DHS wrote.

It added that the immigrant and the two people who had come out of the apartment ran back inside the apartment and barricaded themselves in.

The immigrant and officer who was attacked were taken to hospital, and the other two people who attacked the officer are in custody, DHS wrote.

Who was Renee Nicole Good and what happened to her last week?

On the morning of January 7, Jonathan Ross, an ICE officer, fatally shot Good while she was in her car in Minneapolis.

Local officials said Good, 37, was acting as a legal observer during protests against US President Donald Trump’s immigration crackdown.

Legal observers are usually volunteers who attend protests to watch police-demonstrator interactions and record any confrontations or possible legal violations.

Good’s killing sparked outrage and protests in Minnesota and nationwide.

In a joint statement released after she was shot dead, Minneapolis City Council President Elliot Payne and council members wrote: “Renee was a resident of our city who was out caring for her neighbors this morning and her life was taken today at the hands of the federal government. Anyone who kills someone in our city deserves to be arrested, investigated, and prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.”

After Good was shot, the Republican Trump administration clashed with local authorities, including Democratic Governor Tim Walz and Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey.

Trump and administration officials claimed that Good had deliberately hit the ICE officer with her SUV and he had shot her in self-defence.

US Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem described Good’s actions as “domestic terrorism”.

She said Good had refused to obey orders to get out of her car, “weaponise[d] her vehicle” and “attempted to run” over the officer. Minnesota officials disputed Noem’s account, citing videos showing Good trying to drive away.

Footage from the incident shows Good’s car slowly reversing and then trying to move forwards. As the car moves forwards, an agent is seen walking around in front of it. He opens fire while standing in front of the driver’s side of the SUV.

Speaking about the shooting on Wednesday, Trump told the Reuters news agency: “I don’t get into right or wrong. I know that it was a tough situation to be in. There was very little respect shown to the police, in this case, the ICE officers.”

What have local authorities said about the latest shooting?

Walz wrote in an X post on Wednesday that state investigators have been to the scene of the shooting.

“I know you’re angry. I’m angry. What Donald Trump wants is violence in the streets,” Walz wrote.

“But Minnesota will remain an island of decency, of justice, of community, and of peace. Don’t give him what he wants.”

In a series of posts on X on Wednesday, Frey wrote: “No matter what led up to this incident, the situation we are seeing in our city is not sustainable.”

He added that there are 600 local police officers working in Minneapolis, and the Trump administration has sent in 3,000 federal officers.

“I have seen conduct from ICE that is intolerable. And for anyone taking the bait tonight, stop. It is not helpful. We cannot respond to Donald Trump’s chaos with our own chaos.”

What is ICE doing in Minnesota?

The DHS launched Operation Metro Surge, which includes Minneapolis, in December. The Trump administration said the operation aims to root out and arrest criminals and undocumented immigrants.

The Trump administration escalated its immigration operation in Minneapolis on January 6. In an X post, ICE announced it planned to deploy 2,000 additional agents to the northern Midwestern city.

“A 100% chance of ICE in the Twin Cities – our largest operation to date,” the post said, referring to Minneapolis and the adjacent city of St Paul.

Todd Lyons, the acting director of ICE, told local news media that ICE is “surging to Minneapolis to root out fraud, arrest perpetrators and remove criminal illegal aliens”.

On Monday, the state of Minnesota filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration, arguing that the operation is an unconstitutional “federal invasion”.

The population of Minnesota is more than 5 million people, and according to numbers from the Migration Policy Institute from 2023, the number of undocumented immigrants in the state is 100,000.

Republicans have made disparaging remarks particularly targeting the state’s Somali population.

Noem said on Tuesday that Trump intends to end temporary deportation protections and work permits for some Somali nationals in the US.

“Country conditions in Somalia have improved to the point that it no longer meets the law’s requirement for Temporary Protected Status,” Noem said in a statement. “Further, allowing Somali nationals to remain temporarily in the United States is contrary to our national interests. We are putting Americans first.”

In December, ICE launched a raid in Columbus, Ohio, which also has a large Somali population. In late November, ICE agents were deployed in New Orleans, Louisiana. Similar raids were launched in Charlotte, North Carolina, the same month.

How many Venezuelan immigrants are in the US?

As of 2023, there were about 770,000 Venezuelan immigrants in the United States, making up just under 2 percent of the country’s 47.8 million foreign-born population, according to the Migration Policy Institute.

The institute estimated that in 2023, 486,000 Venezuelan immigrants were not authorised to be in the US, accounting for 4 percent of a total of 13.7 million unauthorised immigrants.

Since 2014, about 7.7 million Venezuelans, comprising 20 percent of the population, have left the country, mostly to seek better opportunities abroad as the economy has faltered and the government has cracked down on the political opposition. While the vast majority have moved to neighbouring countries, some have gone to the US.

On January 3, US forces abducted Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro, whom the Trump administration describes as a “narcoterrorist”. He currently faces charges related to weapons and drug trafficking in New York.

During a national address on January 3, Trump stated: “Maduro sent savage and murderous gangs, including the bloodthirsty prison gang, Tren de Aragua, to terrorise American communities nationwide.”

The search for a figure to lead post-war Gaza, which lies in ruins from Israel’s genocidal war, has moved from diplomatic backrooms to the negotiating tables in Cairo.

Following the Arab veto of the regionally toxic former British leader Tony Blair, Washington has deployed its Plan B, Nickolay Mladenov, as the push for phase two of the fragile ceasefire gains some momentum.

The 53-year-old former Bulgarian foreign minister and defence minister is no longer just a nominee; he is arguably the most critical figure in the newly launched phase two of the ceasefire, which Israel has violated on a daily basis since October 10.

Mladenov has been confirmed as the director-general of the United States-proposed “Board of Peace”. His mandate is to oversee the transition from Hamas rule to a new technocratic administration led by Ali Shaath, a former Palestinian Authority (PA) deputy minister.

For five years from 2015-2020, Mladenov served as the United Nations’ top envoy to the region, earning a reputation as a “firefighter” who could talk to everyone.

Now, he returns with a far more fraught and potentially explosive mission: Implementing a US-designed plan that explicitly calls for the “disarmament of all unauthorised personnel” – a euphemism for ending Hamas’s military power while Israel continues its occupation.

The mediator’s test

Mladenov’s immediate challenge is not just reconstruction, but high-stakes mediation. His itinerary, which includes meetings with leaders of Palestinian factions in Cairo, highlights why he was chosen: He is one of the few international figures who retains lines of communication with all sides while holding the trust of Washington and Israel.

While US special envoy Steve Witkoff has framed phase two as an effort to “create the alternative to Hamas”, Mladenov’s role is to make that alternative function on the ground.

He is tasked with supervising the new “technocratic committee” headed by Shaath, which will manage daily life for two million war-battered Palestinians who have lost family members, their homes, hospitals and schools in relentless Israeli bombardment.

However, this structure will face a crisis of legitimacy. Mladenov must navigate a landscape where Israel controls a “buffer zone” in the east, more than 50 percent of the whole territory, and refuses to withdraw fully – all while he attempts to sell a governance plan to the very factions he is tasked with disarming.

A ‘technocrat’ in a war zone

Mladenov’s appointment signals Washington’s preference for a managerial solution to a military and political crisis.

In his recent post-UN career, Mladenov has championed a “new model” for the Middle East, defined by “cutting-edge innovation” and technological partnerships. He has spoken enthusiastically about the region shifting from “oil barrels to silicon chips”.

Critics, however, argue that this worldview presents a mismatch for Gaza’s current reality. As the Strip enters the second phase, the needs are existential, not technological. The displaced population is living in flimsy tents in extreme weather, dependent on humanitarian aid that Israel largely blocks, and navigating a landscape of rubble.

There is a concern among humanitarian experts that Mladenov’s mandate – tied to high-level “Board of Peace” politics – may be divorced from the gritty requirements of a starving population. The risk is of an administrator focused on a “Davos-style” future while the present remains mired in catastrophe.

A shift in alignment

While Mladenov is often cited as a “fair broker” trusted by both Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and the PA, his post-UN career suggests a subtle but significant realignment.

Since 2021, he has served as director-general of the Anwar Gargash Diplomatic Academy in Abu Dhabi. In this capacity, he has become a vocal proponent of the “Abraham Accords” – the normalisation agreements between Israel and several Arab states – framing them as a “supercharge” for regional stability.

This perspective places him firmly within the strategic orbit of some Gulf states and US President Donald Trump’s administration. While this connection may help secure funding for reconstruction, it complicates his standing on the Palestinian street, where the accords are often viewed as the diplomatic architecture that allowed Palestinians’ plight to be sidelined.

The mandate: Neutrality vs enforcement

The specific nature of phase two could make Mladenov’s job nigh impossible.

In his previous role, Mladenov reported to the UN secretary-general and was bound to uphold international law. In his new role, he answers to a US-led board that heavily leans into the Israeli narrative of its “security demands”, specifically the “disarmament of all unauthorised personnel”.

Mladenov must now persuade Palestinian factions to engage with a “technocratic” promise of governance, overseen by a diplomat who has spent the last few years advocating for Arab-Israeli normalisation.