Amazon’s Prime Day sale includes a highly rated pod coffee machine reduced by over £100
This article contains affiliate links, we will receive a commission on any sales we generate from it. Learn more
Nespresso Lattissima One coffee machine by De’longhi is currently on sale with 42% off(Image: Amazon)
Amazon’s annual Prime Day sale is underway (July 8-11), with the shopping giant offering deals on thousands of products across tech, fashion, beauty and home. One of the offers sees more than £100 off a coffee machine that shoppers are calling the ‘best I’ve ever had’.
Now costing £152 instead of £259.99, the Nespresso Lattissima One coffee machine by De’longhi seems to merge the ease and practicality of pod coffee devices – seen in the likes of Nespresso Vertuo Pop Coffee Machine, £99, and L’OR BARISTA Sublime Machine, £59.99 – with more complex gadgets which have built-in milk frothers. For example, just like the £169.99 Breville One-Touch CoffeeHouse II VCF146 Coffee Machine.
The Lattissima One, which is born from a collaboration between two coffee powerhouses, De’Longhi and Nespresso, comes in a sleek black colour as well as crisp white and measures at a rather compact 25.6D x 15.4W x 32.4Hcm.
Read more: ‘Miracle’ hair oil transforms ‘straw-like’ locks in just one use praised by shoppers
Read more: Antler’s stylish ‘Ryanair-approved’ carry-on tote becomes an unlikely hit with celebs at Wimbledon
Made with a detachable milk tank, the coffee machine has an integrated single-serve fresh milk system that allows its users to enjoy a Espresso Macchiato, Cappuccino and Latte Macchiato. The machine also has two drip trays – one for the espresso and one to catch any dripping milk.
The 19-bar pressure pump system features an 18-second heat-up function – making morning coffees swift and easy. The espresso device requires only the touch of a button to make the ‘perfect’ coffee and can fit in a plethora of different sized cups from 40ml to 160ml.
Shop the deal
£259.99
£152
Buy Now on Amazon
Shoppers have been left ‘beyond impressed’ with the coffee machine, with one person sharing their delight at the discounted device: “I am beyond impressed with the De’Longhi Lattissima One Evo! This coffee maker has transformed my mornings with its ease of use and high-quality results.”
They added: “This machine delivers barista-level coffee effortlessly. Whether it’s a cappuccino, latte, or just a simple espresso, the taste is fantastic every time. The automatic milk frothing system is a game changer—it produces the perfect froth for cappuccinos and lattes, with a creamy texture that you’d expect from a café.”
The Nespresso Lattissima One coffee machine by De’longhi is compatible with a whole range of coffee pods(Image: Amazon)
Another satisfied customer remarked: “Wow, what a coffee maker and sooooooo different to the last. It makes perfect frothed coffee, and I’ve been tempted now to make an Irish coffee as well.”
One Nespresso fan, who’d previously used the CitiZ & Milk machine, raved: “Having previously owned the Nespresso Citiz & Milk, I decided it was time for an upgrade & what an excellent decision it has proven to be. The ease of making a milk drink at a tap of a button is an instant sell for me. Every drink comes out hot & so creamy. The machine itself is compact & fits well in the kitchen. Cleaning the milk component is very easy. The overall performance of the machine is 10/10.”
Someone else shared how the machine is ideal for those working from home: “This machine is perfection.. I was a bit worried that it won’t work well with non-dairy milk or that I won’t find any pods that I like.. boy was I wrong! I am very picky about my coffee but this (to me) is as good as coffee shop coffee.
“Thanks to the samples that come with the machine I now know which notes and intensity work for me and the machine is just a delight to use! Milk frother is SO easy to wash and out together, it’s maintenance free, looks great, takes almost as little space as my kettle and the coffee is ready in seconds!”
While praise for the machine has been plenty, there were some improvements one particular reviewer thought was needed: “The coffee machine is fine, but the spout drips for a long time after use. To make this worse the drip tray is so shallow that when the spout drips, the water/coffee bounces out and causes a mess.”
Article continues below
Another shared a suggestion: “I recommend getting a straw cleaner to clean the milk tube and steamer.”
Irish group Kneecap took to the stage at Glasgow’s O2 Academy and wasted no time in calling out the Scottish First Minister after being dropped from the TRNSMT lineup
The band were dropped from TRNSMT(Image: AFP via Getty Images)
Irish rap trio Kneecap have left a scathing response to Scottish First Minister John Swinney following their axe from TRNSMT Festival. The bad were set to play a sell-out show at the Glasgow event, but were removed from the bill due to safety concerns.
Now, band members Mo Chara – who was recently charged with a terror offence, which he denies – Móglaí Bap, and DJ Próvaí, has slammed the decision, which came by Police Scotland at the end of May. They had initially been billed to headline the King Tut’s stage on Friday, but were axed.
Instead, they played to a sold out crowd at the city’s O2 Academy on Tuesday. Such is the band’s popularity, the event sold out within 80 seconds.
John Swinney was criticised by Kneecap(Image: Getty Images)
In May, Swinney had called for the July 11 performance to be called off, urging the organisers to consider the issue of safety. He said: “It would be unacceptable to perform on such a stage given the fact their comments are so beyond the pale.”
In the end DF Concerts, who run the event, decided to remove their slot from the event. Despite their removal, the band wasn’t prepared to let it go quietly.
According to the BBC the Irish musicians took just 10 minutes to address the situation at their Tuesday evening gig. Chara is said to have told the crowd: “What’s your First Minister’s name?” before swearing and saying: “They stopped us playing TRNSMT but they can’t stop us playing Glasgow.”
They added they didn’t feel as though it was the fault of the festival. Instead, the pointed the finger at Prime Minister Keir Starmer, getting another chant going against him after he called for the band to be dropped from Glastonbury.
Prior to the show, the band arrived at the venue amidst a sea of Palestine flags from Scottish Palestine Solidarity Campaigners. In May, Chara, whose real name is Liam Og O Hannaigh, was charged with a terrorism offence relating to displaying a flag in support of Hezbollah at a gig in London last November.
Kneecap hit out at the First Minister(Image: Rowan Griffiths / Daily Mirror)
The 27-year-old artist from Belfast was charged with displaying a flag at the O2 Forum in Kentish Town, North London, on November 21, “in such a way or in such circumstances as to arouse reasonable suspicion that he is a supporter of a proscribed organisation”, a statement said.
The force added at the time: “Officers from the Met’s counter terrorism command were made aware on Tuesday April 22 of an online video from the event. An investigation was carried out, which led to the Crown Prosecution Service authorising the above charge.”
The band continue to strongly deny the charges brought against the star. They previously released a statement to insist they will “vehemently defend” themselves against what they claimed was “political policing”.
They have since had a controversial gig at Glastonbury too. The stage was shut down early due to huge numbers before the band played to a raucous crowd and made a number of shocking statements.
The BBC decided against live streaming the set, much to the disappointment of fans at home.
Nairobi, Kenya – On June 7, Albert Ojwang was visiting his parents in his home village of Kakoth in Kenya’s Homa Bay County. His mother had just served him ugali (maize meal) and sukuma wiki (kale) for lunch when police officers on motorbikes arrived at the family’s compound.
Before Ojwang could take a first bite, they arrested him, taking him to the local Mawego police station before transporting him 350km (200 miles) to the Central Police Station in the capital, Nairobi.
The officers told his parents he had committed an abuse against a senior government official and was being arrested for publishing “false information” about the man on social media.
Ojwang, a blogger and teacher, had no criminal record and was just a month shy of his 31st birthday. But it was a celebration he would not live to see because less than a day later he was dead.
Police said he died by suicide after “hitting his head” against the wall of a cell where he was being held alone. But after an uproar from the public and rights groups and further investigation, the claim did not hold up. Eventually, two police officers were arrested.
Still, the public anger that erupted after Ojwang’s death did not abate.
Kenyans have been on tenterhooks since mass antigovernment protests erupted across the country a year ago – first against tax increases in a finance bill and later for the resignation of President William Ruto.
In the time since, police have been accused of human rights abuses, including allegations of government critics and activists being abducted and tortured.
Ojwang was seen by many as yet another victim of a system trying to silence those attempting to hold the government to account.
And in the month since his death, angry protests have soared; state violence – and deaths – against civilians have continued; and young people seem determined not to give in.
Eucabeth Ojwang and Meshack Opiyo, parents of Albert Ojwang, who died in Kenyan police custody [Monicah Mwangi/Reuters]
‘False and malicious information’
Ojwang was the only child of Eucabeth Ojwang and Meshack Opiyo, a retired quarry worker who had endured hard labour for 20 years in Kilifi County to send his son to school.
Opiyo left the back-breaking job after Albert Ojwang had secured a job as a teacher, hoping his son would help take care of the family after earning a degree in education.
“I had only one child. There’s no daughter. There’s no other son after him,” he told Al Jazeera. “I have suffered … while [working] in a quarry in Timbo for 20 years so that my child could go through school and earn a degree,” he added, saying Ojwang left behind a three-year-old son.
Ojwang was a promising teacher at Kituma Boys’ Secondary School in the coastal Taita Taveta County, about 700km (435 miles) southeast of his childhood home, his family said.
Media reports said he was linked to an account on X that several people used to publish news about Kenya’s government and politics. That’s what drew the attention of the authorities who came to his father’s house that June afternoon.
That day, the arresting officers assured Opiyo his son would be safe when they took him into custody. Overnight, the father left for Nairobi – taking his land title deed with him to use as a surety to bail his son out because he had no other money. But the news he received was of his son’s death.
“I thought we would come and solve this issue. I even have a title deed here in my pocket that I had armed myself with, so that if there were going to be need for bail, we would talk with a lawyer to bail him,” Opiyo told journalists the Sunday morning after his son’s death, having just learned what had happened to him.
Despite police claims that Ojwang died from self-inflicted injuries, his family and the public were sceptical. Human rights advocates and social media users alleged foul play and an official cover-up by police.
As public pressure mounted on the police to offer clarity, Inspector General of Police Douglas Kanja confirmed that his deputy, Eliud Lagat, was the senior official who had made a “formal complaint” that led to Ojwang’s arrest.
“The complaint alleged that false and malicious information had been published against him [Lagat] in the X – that is, formerly Twitter – social media platform. The post claimed that he was involved in corruption within the National Police Service,” Kanja said before Kenya’s Senate and the media on June 11.
Demonstrators protest over the death in police custody of Albert Ojwang, in Nairobi [Andrew Kasuku/AP]
At first, Kanja repeated to the media that Ojwang had hit his head on the wall, killing himself in the process. But when questioned by lawmakers in the Senate, he admitted that was incorrect.
“Going by the report that we have gotten from IPOA [Independent Policing Oversight Authority], it is not true; he did not hit his head against the wall,” Kanja said. “I tender my apology on behalf of the National Police Service because of that information.”
A team of five government pathologists also released a report that revealed severe head injuries, neck compression and multiple soft tissue traumas. The cause of Ojwang’s death, they determined, was a result of the injuries, not a self-inflicted incident.
Meanwhile, Ann Wanjiku, the IPOA vice chairperson, told senators that preliminary findings showed Ojwang was alone in the cell but two witnesses who were in the next cell said they heard loud screams from where Ojwang was held.
The IPOA report also suggested there was foul play at the Nairobi Police Station because CCTV cameras had been tampered with on Sunday morning after Ojwang’s death.
Subsequently, several people were arrested and investigated, including two police officers who have been charged.
Police Constable James Mukhwana, an officer arrested and arraigned in court over Ojwang’s death, told IPOA investigators that he had acted on orders of his boss.
“It is an order from the boss. You cannot decline an order from your superior. If you refuse, something may happen to you,” he said in a statement to the IPOA. He added that his superior told him: “I want you to go to the cell and look at those who have been in remand for long. Tell them there is work I want them to do. There is a prisoner being brought in. Take care of him.”
Mukhwana pleaded not guilty in court but said he was sorry about the death in his statement, adding: “Ojwang was not meant to be killed but to be disciplined as per instruction.”
Who is ‘sanctioning’ these killings?
Since Ojwang’s death, Kenyan rights organisations have condemned what they say is his “murder”, calling the failure by authorities to hold accountable those responsible for police brutality as disrespect for human rights.
“The savage beating to death of Albert Ojwang and the subsequent attempts to cover this up shatter once more the reputation of the leadership of the Kenyan Police Service,” Irungu Houghton, the executive director at Amnesty International Kenya, told Al Jazeera.
“Amnesty International Kenya believes the failure to hold officers and their commanders accountable for two successive years of police brutality has bred the current impunity and disrespect for human rights,” he said.
Houghton also called for all those implicated to step aside and allow for investigations to take place.
“To restore public confidence and trust, all officers implicated must be arrested. … Investigations must be fair, thorough and swift. This moment demands no less.”
Amnesty has previously called out police abuses, including “excessive force and violence during protests”, and reported abductions of civilians by security forces. Rights groups said more than 90 people have been forcibly disappeared since June 2024.
“Albert Ojwang’s killing in a police station comes after persistent repeated police denials that the normal chain of police command is not responsible for the 65 deaths and 90-plus enforced disappearances seen in 2024,” Houghton said.
“Who are the officers abducting and killing those who criticise the state? Who is sanctioning or instructing these officers? Why has the government found it so difficult to trigger deep reforms to protect rather than stifle Kenyans’ constitutional freedom of speech and assembly as well as act on public policy opinion?” he asked.
Speaking in an interview with Kenya’s TV47 on June 24, the National Police Service Spokesperson Michael Muchiri acknowledged police brutality within the service, saying it was wrong.
“We accept and we acknowledge that within our ranks, we’ve gotten it wrong multiple times,” he said. But he added: “An act by one of us, and there have been a couple of them many times over, should not in any way be a reflection of the whole organisation.”
Al Jazeera reached out to Deputy Inspector General of Police Lagat to comment on the allegations against him, but he did not respond.
A pro-government counterprotester and a riot police officer rush towards hundreds of protesters angry about state violence [Thomas Mukoya/Reuters]
Shot at protests
Many of the Kenyans reportedly targeted by police and other “state agents” were young, vocal participants in the antigovernment protests that engulfed the capital and other cities last year.
After Ojwang’s death, the Gen Z protesters once again erupted in anger.
On June 17, they staged a demonstration in Nairobi to demand justice for their fallen comrade. Things soon got out of hand as the police used force, resulting in fatalities among the young people.
Boniface Kariuki, a mask vendor in Nairobi, was caught between the police and protesters, and the police fired a rubber bullet at his head at close range, sending him to an intensive care unit at the Kenyatta National Hospital. He was declared brain dead after a few days and died on June 30.
An autopsy report released on Thursday said Kariuki “died from severe head injuries caused by a single close-range gunshot”. It further revealed that four bullet fragments remained lodged in his brain.
Two officers who had been caught on camera firing the deadly bullet have been charged.
This came about the time Kenyan youth also marked a year since the antigovernment protests began on June 25, 2024.
In line with the anniversary, many young people across the country took to the streets to express their anger against the government.
Those protests also became violent. Many businesses were destroyed in Nairobi, and some police stations in other places were set ablaze.
That same day, three 17-year-olds, among others, were shot dead in different parts of the country. While the police have not commented on the deaths, the victims’ families and rights groups say all three were killed in crossfire during the protests.
A protester in Nairobi scuffles with a police officer during a protest against the death of Ojwang [Andrew Kasuku/AP]
Dennis Njuguna, a student in his final year of secondary school, was shot in Molo, Nakuru County, as he headed home from school for his mid-term break.
In Nairobi’s Roysambu area on the Thika Superhighway, police reportedly also shot dead Elijah Muthoka, whose mother said he had gone to a tailor but did not come back. That evening, she would receive the news that he was hospitalised at the nearby Uhai Neema Hospital. He was then transferred to the Kenyatta National Hospital and pronounced dead the next morning.
Outside Nairobi in Olkalou, Nyandarua County, Brian Ndung’u was shot twice in the head, according to an autopsy report released by pathologists at the JM Kariuki County Referral Hospital. Margaret Gichuki, Ndung’u’s sister, said her brother had just completed his secondary school education and learned photography so he could help raise his college fees together with their mother, who is a daily wage labourer.
“He had gone out to do street photography, which was his passion, and that is where he got shot. I was home and learned about his shooting through Facebook images that were shared by friends,” Gichuki told Al Jazeera.
Gichuki described her brother as a hardworking young man who had a lot of dreams, but which were cut short by the bullet. “After the autopsy, we could not get further information about the identity of the bullet that was removed from his head, as the police took it,” she said, explaining that one bullet was fragmented in his brain while another was removed by doctors and handed to the police during autopsy.
Together with their cousin Margaret Wanjiku, Gichuki then called to inform their mother that Ndung’u was missing – not wanting to immediately shock her with the news that her son had died.
“Ndung’u had been pronounced dead on arrival at the hospital, but this was news that carried weight for [our mother], and we wanted to have her come home before we could break it other than tell her over the phone,” Wanjiku said.
‘Surge’ in harassment
Less than two weeks after that, Kenyans again took to the streets in demonstrations that once again turned deadly.
On Monday, they rallied for “Saba Saba” meaning “Seven Seven” in Kiswahili to mark the date on July 7, 1990, when people demanded a return to multiparty democracy after years of rule by then-President Daniel arap Moi.
This year, the protest turned into a wider call for Ruto to resign and also a moment to remember Ojwang.
Four days earlier, Ojwang’s body had arrived at his home in Homa Bay for a nighttime vigil before his burial the next day.
When it arrived, angry youth took hold of the coffin and marched with it to the Mawego police station, where he was last seen alive before he was taken to Nairobi.
At the station, the youth set the station ablaze before making their way back to Ojwang’s home with his body.
The next day at the funeral, Anna Ngumi, a friend of Ojwang’s, told mourners: “We are not going to rest. We are not going to rest until justice is done. Remember we are still celebrating Seven Seven here. We will do Seven Seven for Albert Ojwang.”
But at the rallies, police were once again heavy-handed. In Nairobi, they fired live rounds and water cannon at the protesters. Eleven people were killed.
The Kenya National Commission on Human Rights said people were also abducted and arrested, adding that it was “deeply concerned by the recent surge in harassment and persecution of Human Rights Defenders (HRDs) accused of organizing the ongoing protests”.
Pallbearers prepare to carry Ojwang’s coffin for burial in Homa Bay, Kenya, on July 4, 2025 [James Keyi/Reuters]
‘Why did you kill my child?’
Within his circles, Ojwang is said to have been a humble person who never quarrelled with anyone and instead sought peace whenever there was a conflict.
His university friend Daniel Mushwahili said Ojwang was modest and sociable.
“I knew this person as a very cool and outgoing person. He had many friends. … He was not an arrogant person, not a bully, and did not even participate in harassing anybody,” Mushwahili said. He was “a person who seeks peace”.
Ojwang’s mother Eucabeth, speaking at a reception by comedian Eric Omondi, lamented her son’s killing, saying she had lost her only child and did not know how the family would cope without him.
“I had hope this child would assist me in building a house. He even had a project to plant vegetables, so we could sell and make money. Now I don’t know where to start without him,” she said.
“I feel a lot of pain because there are people who came home and took my son. … I feel a lot of pain because he is dead.”
Meanwhile, as the investigation into Ojwang’s death continues, his father says he misses his “trustworthy” son, who he relied on to take care of the family’s most valuable things, even with the little they had.
Opiyo said that when the officers came to their house to arrest his son, they saw how little the family had and knew they would not fight back. In his grief, he said he now wants answers from the police and in particular Deputy Inspector General Lagat, who made the complaint against Ojwang.
“Today, my son is dead from injuries inflicted through beating. I need you to explain to me why you killed my child,” Opiyo said.
When the Netherlands face England in Zurich on Wednesday it will be a poignant moment for their veteran captain Sherida Spitse, regardless of the part she plays.
The 35-year-old made her 241st appearance for the Oranje Leeuwinnen in April, becoming the most-capped footballer in Europe in the process.
Curiously, the very first of those record-breaking outings came against England when Spitse was just 16.
Before her fifth European Championship, BBC Sport spoke to some of the coaches and players who have been part of her long career.
What shone through was not just their appreciation for the iconic Dutch midfielder’s professionalism, leadership and technical ability, but Spitse’s fun-loving nature.
“Sherida is one of a kind,” says the Netherlands head coach Andries Jonker. “She has this outstanding skill of passing and shooting, of being a captain, and I don’t know any player who has it in this way.
Best of a team of all boys
Spitse was already a youth player for the Netherlands when she caught the attention of the senior set-up in 2006. Her performance alongside the boys of her hometown club VV Sneek convinced then national head coach Vera Pauw to fast-track the teenager.
“She was playing with the under-17s and I saw her and thought she is so stable and is playing in such a mature way that I want to see her at her club,” recalled Pauw, who has also coached Scotland and the Republic of Ireland.
“So, with my husband, I went to Sneek, met her parents and I was looking – can she handle the higher level? But she was a playmaker and the best of a team with all boys, so I invited her for a training camp straight after.”
Spitse’s elevation came as little surprise to anyone at VV Sneek. Team manager Martin van Klaveren remembers that even before she joined the club aged six, she could be seen kicking a ball around the neighbourhood.
“She was always with a ball under her arm, going in the field and practising by herself,” he said. “Even as a little girl you could see she had a lot of talent.
“When she was old enough to join our club she played with all the guys and was equal to them. She had a very good shot and free-kick. At 12 she was captain because she stood out, the boys were full of respect for her.”
She had ‘everything to become a legend’
Natalia Sollohub
FC Utrecht youth head coach Sylvia Smit was 20, an international of two years’ standing, when Spitse first joined the senior team. By 2012, the pair marked Smit’s 100th cap for the Netherlands with a goal apiece against Wales.
Smit recalled Spitse’s love of games, particularly poker, and the “fun” she brought to the squad as well as a determination to “give her all” on the pitch.
“Sherida was always cheerful and she radiated that,” reflected the 38-year-old, who won 106 caps in her nine-year international career. “Her technical skills were already very good; she had a fantastic right foot shot and was the best at free-kicks.”
Already confident of the youngster’s technical ability, Pauw’s main concern was how she would cope in an adult environment. But after seeing her “emotional stability” and “lightness around the group” the coach delivered a message that has helped keep Spitse grounded.
“I said to her we are going to be very careful with you because you have everything to become a legend in women’s football in the future, but your book is empty so you need to write it, you’re not there yet,” revealed Pauw.
Putting football first
Getty Images
Spitse was closing in on 140 appearances when she wrote one of the finest chapters of her international career – captaining her country to glory in front of record crowds on home soil at Euro 2017.
Handed the armband after the second match by then head coach – and current England boss – Sarina Wiegman, the set-piece specialist scored two vital group-stage penalties. Then, in a six-goal thriller against Denmark in the final, she unleashed an expertly placed free-kick to hand her team a lead they never relinquished.
Ever-present throughout that tournament, Spitse missed just 20 minutes of her side’s run to the World Cup final two years later under Wiegman again, where they lost to the USA.
It had been a different story for Spitse and the Netherlands, though, at Euro 2009 – their first major tournament.
Spitse was 19 with 35 caps by then, but with Pauw largely fielding the same starting XI in Finland, she watched every minute from the bench, including an extra-time semi-final loss to England.
“She never, ever, said anything negative about it,” said Pauw. “That’s exactly what I meant when I said she had everything within her to become a legend because it was just football. She understood the unwritten laws of elite sport.
“I think everybody will say that, she puts football first and always knew what was needed to perform at that level and to grow.”
Part of that growth has been the development of Spitse as a leader, a quality that current Netherlands boss Jonker says he saw in her within days of his appointment in 2022 and one that he believes his players appreciate in her too.
“Within her character, there is this leadership, of being the boss, so she tells the team we are leaving, we are stopping, we’re waiting,” he explains.
Proving the doubters wrong
Getty Images
Despite her continued presence at the top of the international game, her domestic career has been played outside of Europe’s top five leagues – with Dutch sides SC Heerenveen, Twente and Ajax, as well as Norwegian teams LSK Kvinner and Valerenga.
Today, Spitse continues to show her leadership skills as captain of a young group at Ajax, where she recently signed a new two-year contract flanked by her two children, her parents and siblings.
Described by technical director Alex Kroes as “a natural leader and model professional”, her worth to the club she has supported since childhood is clear, as is her contribution to women’s football.
“Sherida’s been around for a very, very long time, she’s always played, she’s helped the game grow in visibility,” added Netherlands team-mate Vivianne Miedema. “In that way she is a leader and we need people like that in football to inspire others to start playing.”
For all her success, however, Spitse has still faced criticism as one of the older members of the Netherlands’ ‘Golden Generation’.
But Jonker said he did not hand her the record-breaking 241st cap as a “present” but because she was “needed” in their Women’s Nations League clash with Austria that day.
And he believed that after working even harder this past year, Spitse – who has recently been used in defence – has proved the doubters wrong.
“Her influence on the team is being a leader outside the pitch, but also on the pitch being able to lead the team, to coach the team,” added Jonker.
A jury in the United Kingdom has convicted three men of arson following an attack on an east London warehouse that was storing Starlink satellite equipment destined for Ukraine.
Prosecutors had alleged that the attack on March 20, 2024, was planned by agents of Russia’s Wagner mercenary group, acting on behalf of Russian military intelligence.
Jakeem Rose, 23, Ugnius Asmena, 20, and Nii Mensah, 23, were found guilty of aggravated arson on Tuesday at London’s Old Bailey court.
Jurors cleared a fourth man, Paul English, 61, who told police that while he was paid to drive the others, he knew nothing about the fire.
Dylan Earl, 21, who was accused of orchestrating the attack, and Jake Reeves, 23, had already pleaded guilty to aggravated arson and offences under the UK’s National Security Act 2023.
Prosecutors said Wagner used British intermediaries to recruit the men to target an industrial unit in Leyton, east London, where generators and Starlink satellite equipment bound for Ukraine were being stored.
Authorities cast the arson, which caused about 1 million pounds ($1.35m) of damage, as part of a campaign of disruption across Europe that Western officials blame on Moscow and its proxies.
Ukraine’s military frequently uses Starlink in its effort to fend off Russia’s invasion.
This undated handout photo taken in 2024 shows damage to the warehouse in east London [London Metropolitan Police via AP]
Commander Dominic Murphy, head of Counter Terrorism Command at London’s Metropolitan Police, said the case was a “clear example of an organisation linked to the Russian state using ‘proxies’, in this case British men, to carry out very serious criminal activity in this country”.
He said Earl and Reeves “willingly acted as hostile agents on behalf of the Russian state,” adding that it was “only by good fortune nobody was seriously injured or worse”.
In this undated handout photo taken in 2024 and provided by the London Metropolitan Police on Monday, June 9, 2025, authorities say Jakeem Rose and Nii Mensah can be seen shortly before setting fire to a warehouse in east London [London Metropolitan Police via AP]
Earl also admitted to plotting to set fire to a wine shop and a restaurant in the upmarket London neighbourhood of Mayfair, as well as plans to kidnap their owner, Evgeny Chichvarkin.
Chichvarkin, an exiled Russian tycoon who has been vocal in his criticism of Russian President Vladimir Putin and the war in Ukraine, told the court in a written statement that he is considered “a key enemy of the Russian state and received daily death threats”.
Two other men were on trial in connection with the arson and related plots.
Ashton Evans, 20, was found guilty of failing to disclose information about terrorist acts relating to the Mayfair plot but cleared of failing to tell authorities about the warehouse arson. After Dmitrijus Paulauskas, 23, was cleared of both, he burst into tears and nodded towards the jury.
Jurors were shown evidence from security cameras and of the arson Mensah filmed on his phone, along with a message he sent Earl later saying: “Bro lol it’s on the news.”
They were also shown hundreds of messages among the men and between Earl and a Russian recruiter.
Earl was the first person to be charged under the National Security Act, which created new measures to combat espionage, political interference and benefitting from foreign intelligence services.
Judge Bobbie Cheema-Grubb said the convicted defendants would be sentenced in autumn.
Founded in 2014, the Wagner Group has become Russia’s largest and most notorious private military company, with operations around the world, including in Africa, the Middle East, South America and Ukraine.
In 2022, Wagner enlisted 50,000 Russian prisoners to fight on the front lines of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, of which some 20,000 were killed in the months-long battle for control of Bakhmut in eastern Ukraine, the group’s founder Yevgeny Prigozhin said at the time.
In June 2023, Prigozhin was listed as a passenger on a private jet which crashed north of Moscow shortly after he led Wagner troops who crossed from Ukraine into the Russian border city of Rostov-on-Don, saying he would fight anyone who tried to stop them.
It is no secret that British players often feel a lot of pressure at Wimbledon.
As I well know from my appearances here, you can feel a desperation to perform well because it is the part of the year when a lot of the non-tennis-watching British public watch our wonderful sport.
The big tennis fans watch the whole year round, but those who don’t form strong opinions from what they see at Wimbledon.
You want to show how good you can be.
Jack Draper – early exit but has game for grass
Getty Images
How far he went: Suffered a second-round exit, losing to 2017 finalist Marin Cilic.
What we learned: Draper still needs a little more time to develop on the grass.
Coming into Wimbledon, all the talk was about whether the British men’s number one was a contender – he was.
That is not an unfair statement to make. It would have been disrespectful if he was not put in that bracket seeing as he is ranked fourth in the world with a big left-handed serve and a big game, plus he was junior runner-up in 2018.
He could not have had a worse draw, though. It was tricky from the start and to play someone with the serve of Cilic on this surface is incredibly bad luck.
What he can take going forward: The season overall has not gone how Draper would have expected – but in a good way.
Winning Indian Wells on a hard court, then reaching the Madrid Open final on clay, showed the level we have long known he had.
His game can naturally fit on grass, but it is tough to expect what we have seen on other surfaces to happen immediately on grass.
Given how short the season is, many people feel quite unsettled at Wimbledon.
Emma Raducanu – showed she can return to top 10
Getty Images
How far she went: Pushed world number one Aryna Sabalenka before losing their third-round match.
What we learned: For Raducanu, it was an incredible tournament.
Coming into the tournament, she had regained the British women’s number one ranking and produced some of her best tennis, beating 2023 champion Marketa Vondrousova and playing even better when she went toe-to-toe with Sabalenka in a narrow defeat.
Although Vondrousova is one of the few players to win a grass-court tournament this season, Raducanu pushing Sabalenka was the most impressive.
I almost felt the winner of Raducanu-Sabalenka could be the winner of the title because the quality of the tennis was some of the best we have seen in the women’s tournament.
What she can take going forward: The knowledge she has the game to trouble the best.
Sabalenka said in her Centre Court interview that she thought Raducanu would be back in the top 10 soon – I don’t think that was simply a platitude to get the crowd on her side.
Everyone in the locker room knows how good Raducanu’s game is. They can feel the strength of her shots.
Katie Boulter – slipped on banana skin
Getty Images
How far she went: Knocked out in the second round with a shock loss to Argentine qualifier Solana Sierra.
What we learned: Boulter came through a tough first-round draw against ninth seed Paula Badosa, but faced a banana skin next in Sierra.
Playing against somebody who has nothing to lose and has won so many matches through qualifying – they are floating through the air, feeling light and hitting the ball well – is really tough.
If you had a ranking by surface, Boulter would be one of the best players in the world on grass.
She thrives on this surface and nobody is more gutted than her at losing.
What she can take going forward: Boulter can still reach the second week of a Grand Slam for the first time.
Her movement has vastly improved and so has her mentality – she is digging in and I don’t think she has imposter syndrome as her ranking has moved up.
Her best results will come on the quick, hard courts, so maybe it is a US Open – where the balls sit up and she can get on top of it, and her serve will still be effective – or on the grass.
Sonay Kartal – became a crowd favourite
Getty Images
How far she went: Reached the fourth round for the first time before losing to Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova.
What we learned: While Kartal says clay is her favourite surface, I am not surprised to see her do well on grass.
In the women’s game you often see the players who like the clay do well on the grass because both surfaces react well to spin, albeit opposite types of spin.
The players who enjoy heavy top-spin on their forehands – like Kartal – often also enjoy hitting their slice backhands.
You can look at Jasmine Paolini and Ons Jabeur, who have both reached Wimbledon finals in recent years, as good examples of players who like variety and lean into their spin more on the grass.
What she can take going forward: There is still room for improvement.
When you look at the recent women who have reached the top 10, you think ‘why couldn’t Kartal do that?’
She is such a sponge. That is why she is moving quickly through the rankings. She is able to be sharp to the pace of the ball and the change of intensity as she starts to play women ranked at the top.
This year she has a great opportunity to capitalise on people not knowing the ins and outs of her game yet.
Cameron Norrie – regaining confidence can have trampoline effect
Getty Images
How far he went: Made the quarter-finals but came unstuck against defending champion Carlos Alcaraz.
What we learned: Norrie has struggled with his form but I love how he stayed with his team when he was going through a rough patch.
So many people would point fingers, looking for an easy fix, instead of taking accountability.
Keeping that consistent team shows his mindset and has been a big part of his recovery.
His level has skyrocketed back to where it was and, although Alcaraz was a cut above, Norrie will be proud of proving he can still go deep at the Slams.
What he can take going forward: Even more belief from his runs at the French Open and Wimbledon.
He will always have confidence in his physicality – it is his bread and butter. Now the confidence is coming back into his shots, he can jump back up really quickly.