Thailand PM moves to dissolve parliament, paving way for election

Thailand’s Prime Minister Anutin Charnvirakul has announced that he is “returning power to the people”, moving to dissolve parliament and opening the door to elections earlier than previously planned.

Anutin has submitted a request for the dissolution of parliament to the king, local media reported on Thursday.

Recommended Stories

list of 3 itemsend of list

If the monarch approves the dissolution, elections must be held within 45-60 days, according to the Thai constitution.

Government spokesman Siripong Angkasakulkiat told the news agency Reuters that the move followed a dispute with the opposition People’s Party, the largest bloc in the legislature.

“This happened because we can’t go forward in parliament,” Siripong said, describing a legislative impasse that has paralysed the government’s agenda.

The political rupture comes as Thailand faces a fourth consecutive day of heavy fighting with Cambodia along their shared border. At least 20 people have been killed and nearly 200 wounded in clashes across more than a dozen locations, some involving artillery exchanges.

Anutin insisted the dissolution would not disrupt security operations. Speaking to reporters on Wednesday, he said military deployments along the border would continue uninterrupted.

He later repeated his stance on social media: “I am returning power to the people.”

Sluggish economy

Anutin, Thailand’s third prime minister since August 2023, has struggled to stabilise an economy hampered by high household debt, sluggish consumption and pressure from United States tariffs. Political uncertainty has added to the strain on Southeast Asia’s second-largest economy.

Anutin had initially said he planned to dissolve parliament by the end of January, with elections scheduled for March or early April.

His rise to power followed his Bhumjaithai Party’s withdrawal from the ruling coalition and a new agreement with the People’s Party, which demanded several concessions, including a referendum on constitutional reform, in exchange for supporting him.

Siripong said the coalition fractured when those demands were not met. “When the People’s Party couldn’t get what they want, they said they will submit a no-confidence motion and asked the PM to dissolve parliament immediately,” he told Reuters.

Failure of rival health bills underscores impasse in US politics

United States Senators have rejected duelling health bills aimed at helping Americans deal with rising insurance costs in the new year.

On Thursday, Republicans blocked a Democrat-led measure that would extend COVID-era subsidies for three years under the Affordable Care Act, popularly known as Obamacare.

Recommended Stories

list of 4 itemsend of list

The proposal was the congressional Democrats’ solution to address rising healthcare premiums next year. But the legislation failed to attract enough Republicans and fell short of the chamber’s 60-vote threshold to advance.

All Democrats voted for the bill alongside four Republicans: Lisa Murkowski and Dan Sullivan of Alaska, as well as Susan Collins of Maine and Josh Hawley of Missouri.

Without the subsidies, premiums could more than double in cost on average, according to KFF, a health policy organisation.

For some, like Nicole Sheaff, a mother of four in New Hampshire, her prices would quintuple.

“I’m terrified we won’t be able to keep up with our mortgage. At the same time, going without health insurance is not an option. My husband has a chronic condition that he needs medication to manage, and he wouldn’t be able to afford it without health coverage. He’s lost family members to the same condition, and we simply can’t take that risk,” Sheaff said in testimony in front of the Democratic Steering and Policy Committee earlier this month.

Republican bill fails as well

A Republican-led proposal earlier in the day also failed to pass. The measure would have sent up to $1,500 to those making less than 700 percent of the federal poverty line, which would be $110,000 for a single person and $225,000 for a family of four.

The payments are intended to help cover out-of-pocket costs for “Bronze” or “Catastrophic” plans on the healthcare marketplace to help meet the threshold they need to pay before their insurance kicks in.

The funds come with limitations that Democrats have long objected to, including verification of citizenship status and that the funds could not be used for abortion or gender transition treatment.

All Democrats voted against the measure and were joined by Republican Senator Rand Paul of Kentucky.

The proposed funds are far below the plans’ deductibles, meaning that even after that payment, a patient would be on the hook for up to $7,500 in out-of-pocket medical expenses before their insurance would start to pay for part of their care.

Those costs can rack up quickly for people with lower-cost plans, with a visit to a US emergency room costing between $1,000 and $3,000, while an ambulance ride can cost anywhere from $500 to more than $3,500.

Underscored by higher costs in food and housing, Felicia Burnett, national director for health care for MomsRising, a family advocacy organisation, said the families around the country are running out of ways to cut costs and higher healthcare bills only further the strain.

“The thing that I’m hearing, honestly, is fear. Families have reached the end of what they’re able to cut, and they’re fearful about their future. They don’t know what to expect when they’re not able to afford to go to the doctor or get the care that they need,” Burnett told Al Jazeera.

“Families are going to be having to make really difficult choices between receiving treatment for their ongoing health issues or buying prescriptions and affording their other basic needs like food and housing.”

Americans back subsidy continuation

Approximately 2.2 million Americans could lose their health insurance premium subsidies if they are not extended, according to the Congressional Budget Office, leaving low- and middle-income families struggling to maintain coverage.

A new Reuters/Ipsos poll found Americans back a healthcare subsidy continuation. Some 51 percent of respondents — including three-quarters of Democrats and a third of Republicans — said they support extending the subsidies. Only 21 percent said they were opposed.

Insurance companies have warned customers of the rising premiums in the new year, and Democrats argue there is not enough time to do anything but a clean extension of the tax credits. Congress is set to leave Washington at the end of this week and will not return until January 5.

With more people forgoing insurance altogether because of the cost, experts like Dr Bruce Y Lee, professor of public health at CUNY Graduate School of Public Health, says there will be additional strains on emergency rooms, which have an obligation to treat people with or without a way to pay for care.

Laura Woods leaves Adam Collard in tears after sharing ‘red flag’ video

Laura Woods said she thought fiancé Adam Collard was a ‘red flag’ but is happy she ‘gave him a chance’ five years later – and the pair are now parents and engaged

Laura Woods has brought fiancé Adam Collard to tears after sharing a video of their relationship so far – despite branding him a ‘red flag’.

The sports presenter took to Instagram to post sweet clips of them getting together before becoming engaged in September 2024. They then welcomed their first child together, a little boy called Leo, who was born in January this year.

Starting the video montage with a clip of a then 22-year-old during his first appearance on Love Island in 2018, Laura wrote: “In 2018 you’ll watch a TV show featuring a very tall, very gorgeous red flag.”

Sharing moments from their life together, including holidays, discovering she is pregnant and getting engaged, as well as welcoming baby Leo, 38-year-old Laura said of Adam, now 30: “In 5 years time, it’s very important you give him a chance,” in reference to when they met in 2023.

READ MORE: Laura Woods TV return confirmed as presenter given first game since collapsing live on air

Adam was quick to comment underneath: “Us 4 against the world, love you.” But in case fans took that as an announcement Laura was pregnant again, she quickly responded: “He means the dog by the way I’m not pregnant,” followed by a laughing emoji face.

In another comment thread, Adam candidly confessed: “Wow, I’m not crying you are,” to which Laura replied: “I definitely am hahahah xxx.”

Fans also commented on the post, which received over 22,000 likes in a few hours. One wrote: “Remember you getting with him and thinking ‘Oh Laura wtf’ but fast forward and look at you all. Just shows that giving that chance can work. Beautiful family.” Laura jokingly replied: “You’re not the only one!”

Another follower said: “I actually love this for you both. Think you are so lovely together. Happy you have found happiness together.” A third commented: “Laura, this is so magical. So, so happy for you. You’re beaming and deserve to be.”

A fourth said of Adam’s previous womanising ways: “Definition of people can change. He was a walking red flag back in the day but now he’s a completely devoted partner and dad. Lovely to see and love this post.”

“Ok. Thanks. This made me cry,” said a fifth fan, as a sixth added: “Adam Collard you have grown up beautifully. Absolutely love this for all of you.”

Adam had a colourful love life before meeting Laura – including two stints on Love Island – one in 2018 and another in 2022. He dated Zara McDermott, who is now in a relationship with One Direction star Louis Tomlinson.

Article continues below

Following an appearance on Celebs Go Datinghe enjoyed enjoyed a brief romance Kate Moss’ little sister Lottie Moss. But after he began dating Laura in October 2023, he admitted he knew she was The One.

Adam got down on one knee in September 2024, at the place ‘they first fell in love’, Carbis Bay beach in Cornwall. The pair announced they were expecting last July followed by the birth of little Leo at the start of this year and the former lothario looks to have become a doting family man. Speaking to OK! in August, Adam revealed that he and Laura are now planning a 2026 wedding.

READ MORE: Ted Baker necklace that’s an affordable alternative to Kate Middleton’s pearl jewellery is on sale

IOC wants Russia & Belarus youth athlete ban lifted

Getty Images

Youth athletes from Russia and Belarus should be allowed to compete for their countries at international events again, says the International Olympic Committee.

The IOC’s executive board has recommended athletes from the two nations should compete at both individual and team youth events under their country’s flag and national anthem, with the proposal supported at its Olympic summit meeting in Switzerland.

The next step involves international federations discussing the move with a view to it being in place by the 2026 Youth Olympic Games in Dakar.

“The summit supported the IOC EB’s recommendation that youth athletes with a Russian or Belarusian passport should no longer be restricted in their access to international youth competitions, in both individual and team sports,” said an IOC statement issued about the summit meeting.

“The summit participants committed to take these discussions back to their organisations for their consideration. It was recognised that implementation by the stakeholders will take time.

“In addition, the standard protocols of the international federation (IF) or the international sports event organiser regarding flags, anthems, uniforms and other elements should apply, provided that the national sports organisation concerned is in good standing.

“The above principles should apply to the Dakar 2026 Youth Olympic Games, and are recommended for adoption by all IFs and international sports event organisers for their own youth events.”

It added: “With its considerations today, the Olympic Summit recognised that athletes, and in particular youth athletes, should not be held accountable for the actions of their governments – sport is their access to hope, and a way to show that all athletes can respect the same rules and each another.”

The statement added that while Russia should still be barred from hosting international events, “this recommendation no longer applies to Belarus”.

Related topics

  • Olympic Games

IOC wants Russia & Belarus youth athlete ban lifted

Getty Images

Youth athletes from Russia and Belarus should be allowed to compete for their countries at international events again, says the International Olympic Committee.

The IOC’s executive board has recommended athletes from the two nations should compete at both individual and team youth events under their country’s flag and national anthem, with the proposal supported at its Olympic summit meeting in Switzerland.

The next step involves international federations discussing the move with a view to it being in place by the 2026 Youth Olympic Games in Dakar.

“The summit supported the IOC EB’s recommendation that youth athletes with a Russian or Belarusian passport should no longer be restricted in their access to international youth competitions, in both individual and team sports,” said an IOC statement issued about the summit meeting.

“The summit participants committed to take these discussions back to their organisations for their consideration. It was recognised that implementation by the stakeholders will take time.

“In addition, the standard protocols of the international federation (IF) or the international sports event organiser regarding flags, anthems, uniforms and other elements should apply, provided that the national sports organisation concerned is in good standing.

“The above principles should apply to the Dakar 2026 Youth Olympic Games, and are recommended for adoption by all IFs and international sports event organisers for their own youth events.”

It added: “With its considerations today, the Olympic Summit recognised that athletes, and in particular youth athletes, should not be held accountable for the actions of their governments – sport is their access to hope, and a way to show that all athletes can respect the same rules and each another.”

The statement added that while Russia should still be barred from hosting international events, “this recommendation no longer applies to Belarus”.

Related topics

  • Olympic Games