Category News

Lionel Messi has won Major League Soccer’s Most Valuable Player award for the second season in a row – the first to achieve that feat in MLS history.

The Inter Miami forward’s two assists helped his side beat Vancouver Whitecaps 3-1 to win the MLS Cup for the first time.

Messi also won the league’s Golden Boot, awarded to the top scorer, after the Argentina legend netted 29 goals in the 2025 regular season.

With assists, the 38-year-old had 48 goal contributions across 28 matches in 2025 – the second most in a single season, including at least three contributions in nine matches, another league record.

The eight-time Ballon d’Or winner also became the first player in MLS history to record 10 multi-goal games in a single campaign, breaking the previous record of eight shared by Stern John, Mamadou Diallo, and Zlatan Ibrahimovic.

Messi scored numerous goals in five consecutive games from May 28 to July 12, becoming the first MLS player to have a multi-goal streak of more than four matches and scoring 10 times in that period.

The MLS MVP award has been presented since 1996 and is voted for by MLS club technical staff, media, and current players.

Messi won more than 70% of the vote, while his nearest challenger, San Diego winger Anders Dreyer, had just over 11%.

The former Barcelona and Paris St-Germain star adds the prize to a list of personal accolades, which include the 2022 World Cup, three The Best Fifa Men’s Player awards, and two World Cup Golden Balls.

Messi has also claimed three Uefa Men’s Player of the Year awards, six European Golden Shoes, six La Liga Best Player recognitions, eight Pichichi Trophies as Spanish football’s top scorer, and 15 Argentine Footballer of the Year awards.

England being two-nil down after two Tests of an Ashes series has few positives, other than a) increasing the likelihood of a stage musical about the series being written if a stirring comeback leads to a historic 3-2 victory; and b) familiarity.

This the eighth time in the past 10 Ashes tours of Australia that England have lost the first two Tests, and the 12th time in the past 20 Ashes contests in either hemisphere – a sequence that began in 1989 when England attempted to fight fire with selectorial mayhem, making four changes after each of the first four Tests, then treating themselves to six changes for the sixth and final match.

Since the Second World War, England lead the ‘Losing the First Two Tests of an Ashes Series’ competition by an impressive margin of 17 to 2, with Australia’s only experience of what has become the default state of Ashesness for England coming in 2013 and 1978-79 (when almost all of Australia’s first and second-choice players were playing World Series Cricket rather than the Ashes).

While the fading echo of the first day in Perth, the various acts of miraculous fortune-flipping in captain Ben Stokes’ career, Joe Root having finally added his name to an Australian honours board, and the theoretical brilliance of England’s batting line-up offer morsels of optimism if you squint hard enough, Ashes history offers little statistical succour.

In 16 of those 18 previous post-war Ashes rubbers in which a team has trailed 2-0 after two Tests, that side has lost the series by at least three Tests. In 1994-95, England micro-bucked the trend by losing only 3-1.

However, this has been a very different series to 2023. Two years ago, England pushed Australia close in both of the defeats – after the febrile, wildly undulating and frequently pyrotechnic Edgbaston and Lord’s Tests, England had scored 34.6 runs per wicket to Australia’s 35.8.

This time, they have averaged 22.7 per wicket to 38.2, figures that are eerily similar to those at the same stage in both 2021-22 (21.8 to 39.5) and 2017-18 (23.9 to 38.6).

And, most pertinently, this is Australia, where England have now failed to win 17 consecutive Tests. Only once have England had a longer winless sequence in a specific country.

They went 19 Tests without victory in Pakistan, but that was not a tale of rapid-onset cricketing despair as recent Ashes tours have become. It was spread over almost four decades, in between victories in Lahore in October 1961 (England’s first Test in Pakistan) and in the Karachi dusk in December 2000. Also, 17 of the 19 Tests were drawn, including three consecutive stalemated series. And one of the two defeats was a narrow one, by three wickets.

By contrast, of the 15 losses in England’s current cavalcade of clatterings in Australia sequence, three have been by an innings. The five in which Australia have successfully chased a fourth-innings target, England have lost by eight, nine or 10 wickets.

The seven Tests England have lost when batting last have all had defeat margins of at least 120 runs. In one of the two draws, England were nine wickets down at the end, with James Anderson and Stuart Broad blocking out the final overs. In the other, Australia comfortably batted out for a draw at the MCG.

None of this means Stokes’ England are destined to fail as spectacularly as most of their two-down-after-two predecessors, but it does highlight the extent of the challenge they face.

They have batted for just 219.1 overs in the two Tests so far, the fewest overs faced by any team in falling to a 2-0 deficit in an Ashes series, and almost 85 overs fewer than at the equivalent stage of their evisceration by Mitchell Johnson in 2013-14.

In Brisbane, for the first time in a Bazball-era Ashes match, Australia were the faster-scoring team. England went at 3.79 runs per over, brisk by most standards but the sixth slowest match scoring rate since the Stokes-McCullum period began in 2022.

However, they conceded runs at more than 4.5 per over for the second consecutive game (4.57 in Perth, 4.54 in Brisbane, the fifth and sixth least economical Tests by an England bowling team).

One of the many disappointments was that, where Australia’s lower order contributed vital runs and equally vital hours, England’s again evaporated rapidly.

The Mitchell Starc-Scott Boland ninth-wicket partnership, which shifted the tone of the series and consolidated Australia’s first-innings advantage into domination, lasted 27.2 overs

England’s eighth, ninth and 10th-wicket partnerships, in four innings across the two Tests combined, have lasted 27.5 overs, equating to a wicket lost every 14 balls.

To illustrate the gulf between on-paper potential and on-pitch actuality, Gus Atkinson (with a century and four other scores over 35 in his 15-Test career) and Brydon Carse (three 35-plus scores in the recent India series, County Championship average over 30, two first-class hundreds) have scored 78-8 off 91 balls in Perth and Brisbane.

Brendan Doggett (Test novice, with a domestic first-class average of 8.5) and Boland (domestic average 12.1, previous Test high score of 20) have scored 41-2 off 125 balls. Australia have scored at a Bazballistic rate, but also played with a flexibility and awareness England have failed to apply for more than fleeting passages.

On the plus side, England’s spin attack is leading Australia’s in wickets taken after the first two Tests.

In the last 50 years of Ashes cricket in Australia, every time England’s spinners have taken more wickets than Australia’s in the first two Tests, they have gone on to win the series – in 2010-11, 1986-87 and 1978-79.

In Brisbane, when Will Jacks took the first wicket by a spinner in an Ashes Test in the southern hemisphere since Steve Smith dismissed Jack Leach in the fourth Test four years ago, England roared into a 1-0 lead in the spinners’ wickets tally for the series.

Admittedly, England were 2-0 up after two Tests in 1978-79, and 1-0 ahead in the other two series, but where there is a statistical straw, let us clutch it, and clutch it hard, before it floats off into the wind.

For those wishing to build an entire house of statistical straws, you could also point to the fact that the last time England were bowled out in under 80 overs in the first four innings of an Ashes was in 2005, another triumphant series.

And, after Stokes and Jacks’ 96-run stand, you could note that every time England have had a seventh-wicket stand of more than 90 in Australia since the Second World War, they have won the Ashes (Ian Bell and Matt Prior putting on 107 in 2010-11, Geoff Miller and Bob Taylor combining for 135 in 1978-79).

More teams could be thrown out of European competitions next season after Uefa informed clubs it would continue its hard-line position on multi-club ownership.

It follows Crystal Palace’s controversial demotion from the Europa League to the Conference League this season.

Uefa issued a circular on Monday to underline that 1 March is the strict deadline for compliance. It insisted there would be no extension to get around the regulations after this date.

Uefa does not permit two clubs within an ownership group to play in the same European competition. The club which finished lower in their domestic league must lose their place if there is a conflict.

Before last season this appeared to be a hollow threat as no team had ever been impacted.

But concerned that the spread of multi-club ownership was presenting a threat to the integrity of European competition, Uefa’s Club Financial Control Body changed the rules.

It brought forward the assessment date from 1 June to 1 March. As a result, three clubs were either demoted or removed in the summer.

Palace were the highest-profile casualty. It was ruled that former co-owner John Textor had decisive influence in both the Eagles and Ligue 1 club Lyon, who had also qualified for the Europa League.

League of Ireland side Drogheda United and Slovak club FC DAC 1904 lost their places in the Conference League.

All three clubs failed in appeals to CAS, which last week published its full decision in Palace’s case. Its judgement backed Uefa’s assertion that there was no mechanism for clubs to become compliant after the deadline.

On that basis, Uefa has now reaffirmed that the 1 March assessment date “is the deadline by which clubs must comply with the multi-club ownership criteria” and that the CAS ruling was binding for “a strict deadline for compliance”.

In their appeal, Palace claimed that other clubs had been given preferential treatment to modify their ownership structures for admission to Europe after 1 March.

Palace highlighted the case of Nottingham Forest. Owner Evangelos Marinakis had diluted his control of the club in preparation for Champions League qualification for both Forest and Olympiakos.

In a similar situation, Chelsea owners BlueCo had issued millions of new shares in Strasbourg in case both clubs ended up in the same competition.

Palace claimed this was proof that some clubs had been given extra time by Uefa to sort out their structures.

This was thrown out by CAS, stating that there was no clause in Uefa’s regulations that permitted it.

It was not tested though, because these clubs did not end up in the same competition. If so, it would have prevented an even bigger test of the regulations.

It makes Uefa’s communication with clubs this week all the more important because it appears to completely close off any loophole beyond 1 March.

Clubs in a multi-club ownership structure who think there is any chance of being in Europe must take the necessary steps to be compliant before this date. If they have not, Uefa will be back next summer to take action again.