How will the EU’s new entry-exit border system work?

Non-European Union citizens travelling to countries in Europe’s Schengen area – within which physical borders between member countries have been removed – will soon have to use a new automated biometric system that is set to replace usual passport procedures.

The EU’s new Entry/Exit System (EES) will be rolled out on Sunday, October 12 and will apply to 29 countries in the Schengen area. The EU expects EES to be fully functional by April 10 next year.

Recommended Stories

list of 3 itemsend of list

Here’s what we know about the EES and who it is going to affect:

What is the EES, and who will it apply to?

The EES is a digital border check system which will keep track of non-EU citizens who enter and exit Europe’s Schengen zone – an area composed of 25 EU members and four non-EU nations which guarantees freedom of movement with no internal border checks.

According to the EU, the EES will apply to those making short-stay journeys into the Schengen zone. A non-EU traveller is someone who does not hold EU nationality or the nationality of Iceland, Liechtenstein, Norway or Switzerland.

Short-stay Schengen visas are issued to people staying in the zone for up to 90 days within a 180-day period.

Citizens from the United States, Canada, Australia, the United Kingdom, and others who normally do not need a visa for short stays in the Schengen zone will, however, also be subject to EES.

The EES will not apply to:

  • Nationals of the Republic of Ireland and Cyprus as they are part of the EU even though they are inside the Schengen area
  • Holders of passports issued by the Vatican City State or the Holy See
  • Non-EU nationals who hold residence permits in EU countries, including Ireland and Cyprus
  • Non-EU nationals who are travelling for research, study, voluntary services or au pair services
  • Travellers who hold residence permits in or long-stay visas for Andorra, Monaco and San Marino, which are not members of the EU but can only be accessed on land via a Schengen-area country
  • People who hold a valid local border traffic permit, crew members of passenger and goods trains on international connecting journeys and people who have been granted certain privileges which exempt them from border checks

How will the EES work?

A non-EU traveller entering any of the Schengen countries will be directed to an immigration booth or a kiosk in the airport, train or bus station they have arrived at. There, their personal data from their passport, including full name, nationality and biometric data such as a facial image and fingerprints, will be recorded. Children below the age of 12 will not have to provide fingerprints.

Bram Frouws, director of the Mixed Migration Centre, a Geneva-based knowledge centre, told Al Jazeera that the EES will not be used for internal border controls.

“Free movement within Schengen remains in place,” he said. Therefore, once travellers are inside the Schengen area, they will not have to undergo checks to travel between Schengen countries.

The EES system will also record the traveller’s exit from the Schengen zone.

A person’s details will be recorded the first time he or she uses the system. The next time the person travels into the Schengen area, their personal details will be verified against those held on file. As long as the system does not flag any new issues, the traveller will be allowed to enter the Schengen country.

Biometric data is held on file for three years following any entry to the area, as long as travellers comply with short-stay visa rules. If you overstay, your details will be held for five years.

The EU Agency for the Operational Management of Large-Scale IT Systems in the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice (eu-LISA) will manage the EES.

The bloc’s border agency, Frontex, has also announced the launch of an EES app through which travellers will be able to pre-register their biometric details.

Chris Borowski, spokesperson for Frontex, told Al Jazeera: “The EES app will help travellers register their details more easily before they reach the border, saving time and reducing queues. Each country decides how and where to use the app – for example at airports or land borders – and must ensure it meets their national requirements before going live.”

So far, five countries have indicated they may wish to use the app: Sweden, Portugal, Italy, Hungary and Greece. Sweden is the first to have confirmed it will use the app at selected border points, including Arlanda Airport, once EES starts operating.

Frontex said it is also also working with France, Germany and the Netherlands to organise pilot tests at key travel hubs next year.

Travellers walk next to newly installed signs pointing to Schengen transfer flights areas, just after Romania’s official entry into the European area of free circulation at Otopeni’s Henri Coanda airport on March 31, 2024 [Daniel Mihailescu/AFP]

Why is EES being introduced?

The European Council announced the EES border management system in July, with a view to “improving the effectiveness and efficiency of controls at the EU’s external borders”, it said.

It added that the system will help to ensure people do not overstay their visas, will reduce identity fraud and will reduce irregular migration to the Schengen zone.

“Strong protection of our external borders is vital for the European Union. The new Entry/Exit system will help us ensure that non-EU nationals travelling to Europe comply with our rules. That will make our borders safer and border checks more efficient,” Kaare Dybvad Bek, the EU’s minister for immigration and integration, said in a statement in July.

Frouws added that the system is designed to identify non-EU travellers who “enter the EU legally, but then overstay [their short stay visa or permit] and try to stay and work in the EU irregularly”.

“They will be flagged automatically and, for example, then face a ban on re-entry in the future. In principle, those with a short-term visa, whether migrants or refugees, can still move through the Schengen zone,” he said.

What does this mean for people seeking asylum?

Frouws pointed out that EES should not initially present difficulties for asylum seekers, as their biometric data is recorded via a different system, called the Eurodac. However, he warned that there could be problems if the EES is used for asylum seekers in the future.

“A refusal to provide biometric details into the EES could be a reason to be denied entry,” Frouws said.

Taking biometric data enables the EU to track where an asylum seeker first entered the bloc. Under the EU’s Dublin regulation, the country of arrival is responsible for processing an asylum claim.

But Frouws explained that some refugees do not necessarily want to claim asylum in their country of arrival because they may have family connections in a different EU country.

The introduction of EES has raised a number of questions relating to asylum seekers and whether it will make them more vulnerable, therefore.

“Will this [EES] always be properly handled at external borders? Could this be used as a way to deny asylum seekers entry? And will asylum seekers know about all their rights and obligations in relation to these systems? These will be important things to watch in the coming months if it is used for asylum seekers,” Frouws said.

Will the EES infringe on travellers’ privacy?

“Like with all such [biometric-data] systems, there is a risk of over-use or abuse,” Frouws said. “For example, you could imagine a future where cameras on streets will be linked with the facial recognition information in EES, and there will be more automated crackdowns on migrant overstayers. Right now, this is not allowed. But it’s possible technologically, there is a risk that this will change in the future.”

According to the EU, however, “Travellers’ data will be collected and stored in full compliance with EU data protection rules and rights.”

The EU’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), which came into force in 2018, safeguards the privacy of individuals by levying fines on individuals or organisations violating privacy and other security standards.

The EU has also highlighted that a traveller’s details collected from EES will only be accessible by border, visa and immigration authorities, law enforcement authorities, Europol and transport companies such as airlines, which are required to report if they are alerted that people have overstayed their short-stay visas.

In unspecified “special circumstances”, the EU said, it could transfer a traveller’s data to an international organisation or country outside the EU, however.

Will there be a visa waiver system with EES?

Yes, but not immediately. Once the EES comes into force properly in 2026, the EU will roll out a new visa waiver system called the European Travel Information and Authorisation System (ETIAS) for citizens of countries exempt from short-stay visas, including the UK, the US, Israel, Albania, Japan, Canada, Georgia, Moldova and Ukraine, among others.

British nationals living in the EU and family members who are already beneficiaries of the UK’s withdrawal agreement with the EU following its withdrawal in 2020 will be exempt from the system altogether. They will travel on their EU or UK passport alongside their EU resident card, which shows they are beneficiaries of the withdrawal agreement.

Those who do need to apply for ETIAS will have to pay a fee of 20 euros ($23.48). Applicants who are aged below 18 years or more than 70, family members of EU citizens or of non-EU nationals who have the right to free movement in the EU, will be exempt from paying this fee.

Once an application is made, an ETIAS waiver will be issued within minutes for many travellers. It may take longer if border check authorities require more information. It will be digitally linked to a person’s travel document and will be valid for three years or until the travel document expires.

BBC presenter sacked over ‘deeply inappropriate’ segments that went ‘beyond innuendo’

Former BBC presenter Jack Murley is seeking £48,000 in compensation after he was sacked over ‘deeply inappropriate’ radio segments that went ‘well beyond innuendo’

A BBC presenter has said he thought he was acting within the broadcaster’s guidelines after he was sacked for “inappropriate” radio segments. Jack Murley was employed by BBC Radio Cornwall from 2019 until he was taken off air in 2023.

He worked in Truro until a “heated conversation” with his boss over his social media use. Murley believed he was “acting within the BBC’s social media guidelines”, a tribunal heard.

He had shared his views on social media since 2022 about the BBC’s Local Value For All project. Questions were also raised about his radio segment, Loosest Goose, which was a satirical show that included innuendo.

READ MORE: Kate Garraway breaks silence on being branded a ‘traitor’ and says ‘I’m having a hard time’READ MORE: Strictly’s Vicky Pattison speaks out after sparking fears she’d quit series after no-show

At the disciplinary hearing, it was described as being “deeply inappropriate” and “well beyond innuendo”. A BBC senior news editor told the tribunal they had been “clear and straightforward decision” to consider the case as “gross misconduct.”

Murley said he would have been willing to make changes to his show or “undertake training” to keep his job. He told the tribunal if concerns were raised, he would have acted to address them.

The presenter is seeking £48,000 in compensation. The BBC said they removed Murley from his post because of a “heated conversation” with his manager.

Murley said the row stemmed from his social media use. A BBC Wales senior news editor was at the hearing and said social media posts were viewed in the same light as a broadcast.

Tomos Livingstone described the Loosest Goose as “awful” and told the hearing it “shouldn’t be broadcast on radio Cornwall at midday on a Sunday”.

The editor said Murley “should have had the knowledge and experience to be compliant with the guidelines.” He added that it had been a “clear and straightforward decision” to consider the case as “gross misconduct”.

Livingstone said the BBC felt Murley had been too great a “risk” to the corporation. Murley’s disciplinary hearing went to appeal and the hearing manager upheld the decision.

BBC Northern Ireland director Adam Smyth said the corporation has to “be sure that our presenters are trustworthy.” Mr Smyth told the tribunal that Murley was “effectively working off grid”.

Article continues below

Murley told the tribunal he had several examples of managers endorsing his innuendo in his radio show. The former presenter said after 13 years with the BBC, it was not “reasonable” to leave immediately after no previous causes for concern.

He questioned how he was to know the show had breached guidelines and said: “I thought I was in the right. I think there was a way back, I wanted to stay at the BBC, I loved the BBC.” The tribunal continues.

Ricky Hatton’s tragic health battles and hopeful plans for future before sudden death

Ricky Hatton will be laid to rest today as thousands of fans mourn the devastating loss of the boxing icon. Before this death, the star bravely opened up about his personal struggles

Boxing legend Ricky Hatton will be laid to rest today with thousands of heartbroken well-wishers expected to gather in and around Manchester to pay tribute.

The sportstar tragically died unexpectedly last month at the age of 46, just three months before he was due to return to the boxing ring. Police said there were no suspicious circumstanes.

Details of the procession, including the route Hatton’s coffin will take before his funeral at midday, have been confirmed. The cortege will start from Gee Cross and pass through Hyde towards Manchester Cathedral, before reaching the Etihad Stadium, home of the icon’s beloved Manchester City.

READ MORE: Everything the police have said about Ricky Hatton’s death at 46 as he’s laid to restREAD MORE: Ricky Hatton’s funeral: Route coffin will take as his family confirms plan in full

Details of the procession, including the route the British icon’s coffin will take before his funeral at midday, have been confirmed. The cortege will start from Gee Cross and pass through Hyde towards Manchester Cathedral, before reaching the Etihad Stadium, home of Hatton’s beloved Manchester City.

Despite his remarkable boxing career, which included a stint on ITV’s Dancing on Ice last year, the boxing legend grappled with his own personal demons.

Hatton was open about his struggles with mental health, having been left feeling suicidal after losing a fight to Manny Pacquiao in 2009. He also became estranged from his parents following a bitter dispute over money in 2009, which culminated in a physical altercation with his father in a car park, and he also fell out with his trainer.

But his troubles started 16 months before, when he endured his first professional loss against Floyd Mayweather in 2007. He confessed that the defeat was “very hard for me to swallow”, but matters improved when he stepped back into the ring five months later and defeated Juan Lazcano in his hometown of Manchester.

Nevertheless, Hatton fell out with his long-standing trainer and close mate, Billy Graham, before being knocked out by Pacquiao in the second round of their bout. “Shortly after that, I fell out with my mum and dad,” he told Man Magazine.

“You can see how my mind was going up and down and up and down. And then I was just sat in my living room, thinking to myself, ‘You’ve got no boxing no more, you can’t share what you’ve done with your mum and dad, you can’t share it with your trainer, you haven’t got a wife anymore…’ I thought, ‘What do I need to be here for?'”.

He continued: “I didn’t want to be here, I really didn’t. Back in the day, when I was in a really, really bad place, I just used to sit in the house and not leave the house. I used to just dwell on things. I think the more time you give yourself to just sit there and ponder, the worse it gets. You go under.”

At the time, his spectacular career looked to be at an end – that and other factors combined to destroyed his mental health. The Manchester boxer also told the Mirror about this time and disclosed: “I had a knife at my wrist every night.”

Hatton said that he believed there was a “stigma” which stops many from voicing their struggles, and he didn’t want to “burden” his loved ones.

After welcoming his daughter, Millie, he sought help from a psychiatrist, revealing that he threw himself on his knees and said, “‘You need to tell me what I’m going to do. I can’t do it on my own. I need help.”

Hatton’s family has stressed that the boxer appeared to be “in a good place” in the weeks leading up to his death. A statement released on September 17 noted: “To all our knowledge, despite his well-documented struggles, Richard was in a good place.

“He was excited for the future; his bag was packed ready to go to Dubai to promote a comeback fight and he was planning a celebration in Dubai of which his beloved girls Millie and Fearne were to be the centre of.”

The family explained that Hatton had enjoyed dinner with his daughters on the Friday prior and had been in regular contact with loved ones and his team.

The former world champion, known affectionately as “The Hitman,” was found dead at his home in Hyde on September 14, prompting an outpouring of grief from fans, family, and fellow fighters.

Greater Manchester Police (GMP) have maintained a consistent position on the circumstances of his untimely death, emphasising that no suspicious elements are involved. While the exact cause remains undisclosed, authorities have ruled out foul play, allowing the focus to shift to celebrating Hatton’s remarkable life and legacy.

Hatton’s body was discovered early that morning by his long-time manager and friend, Paul Speak. GMP were called at 6:45am, arriving at the scene shortly after.

In their official statement, released shortly after the incident, GMP said: “Officers were called by a member of the public to attend Bowlacre Road, Hyde, Tameside, at 6:45am today where they found the body of a 46-year-old man. There are not currently believed to be any suspicious circumstances.”

Article continues below

This phrasing has been echoed across all communications from the force, with no elaboration on the cause of death or any potential contributing factors. Sources indicate the case is not being treated as criminal, in line with protocols for non-suspicious incidents, and no further police inquiries have been publicly announced.

Kate Garraway’s The Traitors pearl detail jumper is under £30 and surprisingly still in stock

Last night’s episode of The Celebrity Traitors saw Kate Garraway donning a stylish pearl-embellished sweater thats currently on sale at a high street store for under £30

Kate Garraway is certainly one to watch as the new series of The Celebrity Traitors kicks off, not just as she participates in the iconic game, but also as she styles an even more versatile, comfortable, and autumn-ready ensemble that has viewers envious. And last night was no different.

In the latter half of the episode, Kate opted for the Black Pearl Detail High-Neck Jumper from Mela, an item she had worn before, back in 2020, at an Adele show in London. And in case Kate’s love for this piece hasn’t made up your mind, her exact jumper is currently on sale for under £30.

READ MORE: Claudia Winkleman’s exact The Traitor’s waterproof boots are a must-have for autumn styling

READ MORE: ‘Spicy and sexy’ fragrance is the only scent Claudia Winkleman wears—and it’s on sale

Touted as a gorgeous Black number that’s the perfect everyday jumper for work or weekend, this sweater lets you wave goodbye to needing other jewellery and accessories thanks to its pearl-decorated collar.

Boasting a high collar filled with delicate pearl detailing, which is matched on the cuffs, this jumper is made from a super-soft, lightweight material that ensures it’s a piece that looks perfect paired with any outfit.

Coming in sizes Small, Medium and Large, this sweater is currently reduced to £29.75 at Debenhams or Dorothy Perkins.

Article continues below

One shopper who joins Kate in adoring this sweater bestows 5 out of 5 stars, hailing this piece a “beautiful jumper”.

US judge blocks Trump’s deployment of National Guard in state of Illinois

A federal judge in Chicago has temporarily blocked United States President Donald Trump’s deployment of hundreds of National Guard soldiers in Illinois.

Chicago has become the latest flashpoint in the Trump administration’s crackdown to deport millions of immigrants, which has prompted allegations of rights abuses and myriad lawsuits.

Recommended Stories

list of 3 itemsend of list

US District Judge April Perry on Thursday said that permitting Guard troops in the state would only “add fuel to the fire”. The decision on comes five days after another US judge blocked a similar deployment in Portland, Oregon.

The judge said her full, written order will be made available on Friday.

The lawsuit was filed Monday by Chicago, the third-largest city in the US, and the state of Illinois to stop the deployments of Illinois and Texas Guard members. Some troops were already at an immigration building in the Chicago suburb of Broadview when Perry heard arguments on Thursday.

In delivering her decision on Thursday from the bench, Perry said she was having difficulty lending credence to the government’s claims of violence during protests at the immigration facility in Broadview, Illinois.

She cited a ruling from another Chicago judge, also issued on Thursday, that temporarily limited the ability of federal agents to use force to disperse crowds. Protesters and journalists had filed a separate lawsuit seeking that order, saying federal officers had injured them at the Broadview center.

Perry said the behaviour of US Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers (ICE) has prompted the protests, and that deploying Guard soldiers to Broadview would “only add fuel to the fire that defendants themselves have started”.

Trump has called this week for the jailing of Democratic officials in Illinois resisting his mass deportation campaign, after armed troops from Texas arrived in the state to bolster the operation.

Separately, a three-judge panel at a federal appeals court in San Francisco on Thursday appeared likely to set aside the ruling blocking Trump’s Portland deployment, which would clear the way for hundreds of soldiers to enter that city.

Trump’s immigration crackdown is aimed at fulfilling a key election pledge to rid the country of what he called waves of foreign “criminals”.

The Trump administration has argued the troops are necessary to protect immigration agents and facilities in Chicago, falsely depicting it as a “war zone”.

The US president says he could invoke the rarely used Insurrection Act to force deployments of troops around the country if courts or local officials are “holding us up”.

The Insurrection Act is a federal law that gives the US president the power to deploy the military or federalise National Guard troops anywhere in the US to restore order during an insurrection.

The last time it was invoked was in 1992, in response to riots in Los Angeles by Republican President George HW Bush.